Extremity Bone Sarcomas Research Articles

Socioeconomic disparities in reception of limb-sparing surgery versus amputation for lower extremity sarcoma

BackgroundIn lower extremity sarcoma treatment, limb salvage approaches present superior alternatives to amputation due to reduced postoperative morbidity and improved quality of life. This study provides a novel analysis of socioeconomic disparities that may affect reception of limb-sparing surgery. MethodsPatients with lower extremity bone or soft tissue sarcoma who received either limb-sparing surgery or amputation from 2007 to 2021 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Demographic, socioeconomic, and oncologic variables were collected for each patient. Multivariate binary logistic regression was conducted to assess preoperative demographic and oncologic risk factors for amputation (p < 0.05). ResultsA total of 6465 patients were identified in the final cohort, 586 (9.1%) of whom received amputation. After controlling for tumor size, stage, and neoadjuvant therapy administration, non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native race/ethnicity predicted the highest odds of amputation (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.12–2.85, p = 0.015). Nonmetropolitan residence (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.43–2.00, p < 0.001) also conferred higher risk of amputation compared with residence in a large metropolitan area. Overall, amputation was associated with a higher risk of ten-year cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.001) even when controlled by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. ConclusionsThere are significant disparities in limb-sparing surgery and amputation rates in lower extremity sarcoma management, even when accounting for differences in baseline oncologic characteristics. Further study into socioeconomic drivers of these trends will allow the development of initiatives that improve disparities in reconstructive outcomes.

The landscape of Functional Outcome Measures Used in Patients with Bone Sarcoma of the Lower Extremity or Pelvis: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review provides a structured overview of the measurement instruments of functional outcome used in lower extremity and pelvic bone sarcoma patients. We identified 42 unique instruments covering 18 distinct functional outcome constructs with most studies measuring constructs within the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, disability, and health. The MusculoSkeletal Tumor Society 1993 and 1987 score, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, and range of motion instruments were the measurement instruments most commonly used.

Detrimental effect of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with extremity bone sarcoma. Reference center experience

1 BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on the healthcare system globally. This work aims to evaluate COVID-19 impact on local treatment in bone sarcoma treated in a single, high-throughput institution. 2 METHODS: We have analyzed the local outcomes (i.e., possibility of limb sparing surgery) in all bone sarcoma patients treated between January 2016 and November 2022 in the main sarcoma reference center in Poland. Patients treated in the 2016-2019 period were regarded as "pre-pandemic" group, patients treated in 2020-2022 - "pandemic". Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used in the statistical analysis. No correction for multiple testing was applied. Tests with p<0.05 were deemed significant. 3 RESULTS: There were 302 eligible patients identified. The group characteristics are presented in table 1. There were no differences in patient-related variables and histological subtypes of tumors between two groups. The tumor size did not differ (p=0.053), when all tumor grades were considered, but high grade tumors were larger in the "pandemic" group (p=0.034). This was reflected in the percentage of limb sparing surgeries which dropped from 83.3% to 68.2% ("pre-pandemic" vs. "pandemic", p=0.004). This difference was even more stark in case of high grade tumors - 78% vs. 54% respectively (p=0.001). 4 CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of the long lasting impact of COVID-19 pandemic on oncologic treatment outcomes in patients with malignant bone tumors.

The utility of intraoperative marrow margin frozen section in extremity bone sarcoma resection.

Intraoperative frozen section analysis is commonly used to evaluate marrow margins during extremity bone sarcoma resections, but its efficacy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging is debated. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section assessment with final pathology, assess its correlation with gross intraoperative margin assessment, and evaluate its impact on surgical decision making. Consecutive patients undergoing extremity bone sarcoma resections from 2010 to 2022 at a single sarcoma center were included. Intraoperative frozen section and gross margin assessments were compared to final pathology using positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). Changes in surgical decisions due to positive intraoperative margins were recorded. Of 166 intraoperative frozen section marrow margins, four were indeterminant/positive, with two false positive/indeterminant findings and two false negatives compared to final pathology. Gross intraoperative assessment had no false positives and two false negatives. Frozen section analysis yielded a PPV of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%-84%) and NPV of 98.8% (95% CI: 97%-100%), while gross assessment had a PPV of 100% (95% CI: 16%-100%) and NPV of 98.8% (95% CI: 97%-100%). Positive frozen section margins led to additional resections in three of four cases. Intraoperative frozen section analysis did not offer added clinical value beyond gross margin assessment in extremity bone sarcoma resections. It exhibited a low PPV and led to unnecessary additional resections. Gross intraoperative assessment proved adequate for margin evaluation, potentially saving time and resources.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Romanian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scoring System for Patients with Extremity Bone Sarcomas.

Background and Objectives: Primary malignant bone tumors are rare lesions, and their complex treatment can lead to functional impairment. It is important to have a postoperative assessment tool for patients' functional outcomes to be evaluated and to consequently adapt future treatments in the pursuit of a continuous improvement of their quality of life. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) is a validated specific system score that is used frequently in the follow-up of these patients. We found no information about a valid translated Romanian version of this score neither for the upper limb nor for the lower limb. We proposed in this study to translate the original version of the MSTS Score into Romanian and to perform validation analysis of the Romanian-language MSTS Score. Materials and Methods: We selected 48 patients who underwent limb-salvage surgery after resection of bone sarcomas. Patients were interrogated twice according to the translated Romanian version of the MSTS Score during their follow-up. The translation was performed according to the recommended guidelines. A total number of 96 questionnaires were valid for statistical analysis. Results: Internal consistency and reliability were good for both sets of questionnaires' analytic measurements, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.848 (test) and 0.802 (retest). The test-retest evaluation proved to be statistically strong for reproducibility and validity with Spearman's rho = 0.9 (p < 0.01, 95% CI). Conclusions: This study permitted the translation of this score and the validation of psychometric data. Our results showed that the Romanian version of the MSTS is a reliable means of assessment of the functional outcome of patients who received limb-salvage surgery for the upper and lower extremities.

Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma

BackgroundThis study assesses survival rates among patients with localized extremity bone sarcoma who have undergone amputation, pinpointing subpopulations that are disproportionately affected by amputation-related survival disparities. MethodsExamination of data was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, analyzing records of 3765 patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma between 2000 and 2019. Of these, 857 received amputations (Amputation cohort), and 2908 underwent limb-sparing surgeries. Propensity score matching, considering demographic and clinical features, was utilized to ensure a fair comparison. ResultsFollowing propensity score matching, the study focused on 1714 cases. The Amputation cohort was observed to have significantly poorer survival rates (Cancer-Specific Survival [CSS]: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.05–1.55; Overall Survival [OS]: HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15–1.63). Subsequent subgroup analysis indicated that individuals with tumors exceeding 8 cm in size or those located in the lower limbs were notably at a higher risk of shortened survival (for tumors >8 cm – CSS: HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.71; OS: HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09–1.76; for lower limb tumors – CSS: HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01–1.54; OS: HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.11–1.61). ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that patients diagnosed with localized extremity bone sarcoma undergoing amputation exhibit lower survival rates, especially in cases involving tumors of greater size or those situated in the lower limbs. In patient groups where amputation is inevitable, careful follow-up is required after surgical intervention.

The role of imaging in extremity sarcoma surgery.

The surgical management of extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas has evolved significantly over the last 50years. The introduction and refinement of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging has allowed accurate assessment of anatomy and tumor extent, and in the current era more than 90% of patients can successfully undergo limb-salvage surgery. Advances in imaging have also revolutionized the clinician's ability to assess treatment response, detect metastatic disease, and perform intraoperative surgical navigation. This review summarizes the broad and essential role radiology plays in caring for sarcoma patients from diagnosis to post-treatment surveillance. Present evidence-based imaging paradigms are highlighted along with key future directions.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgical resection of primary lower extremity bone or soft-tissue sarcoma.

The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE)and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)following resection of lower extremity primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma. We retrospectively identified 2083 patients from the PearlDiver database who underwent resection of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity from January 2010 to October 2021 and prescribed LMWH or DOAC within 90-days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were comparison of postoperative incidence and odds of deep venous thrombosis(DVT), pulmonary embolism(PE), and bleeding complications within 90-days following resection. Patients prescribed DOACs had a greater odds of DVT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.41;p = 0.024) and PE (OR: 3.38;95% CI: 1.96-5.86;p < 0.001) within 90-days following resection of bone sarcoma when compared withthe LMWH cohort. Patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcomas also had greater odds DVT (OR: 1.65;95% CI: 1.09-2.49;p = 0.016) and PE (OR: 2.62;95% CI: 1.52-4.54;p < 0.001) in the DOAC cohort. There was no difference in the odds of bleeding complications. This study demonstrated an increased incidence and odds of VTE, but not bleeding complications, when using DOACs versus LMWH after primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma resection. Level III.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a self-reporting tool to assess health-related quality of life for Egyptians with extremity bone sarcomas in childhood or adolescence

BackgroundValidated self-reporting tools are required to evaluate the functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for those who had extremity bone sarcomas in their childhood or adolescence. Our study pursued cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the pediatric Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (pTESS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) to assess the functional outcome for Egyptian children and adult survivors following surgeries of extremity bone sarcomas. In the modified versions of pTESS and TESS, mental domains were added to allow the evaluation of HRQOL using a specific instrument for childhood bone cancer.MethodsThe internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the studied forms were assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and Intra-class coefficients (ICC), respectively. For convergent validity, correlations between scores of the generic Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) and pTESS /TESS scores were reported. Factor Analysis was feasible for pTESS-leg; due to the insufficient samples, only the average inter-item correlation coefficients were reported for the remaining versions.ResultsOut of 233 participants, 134 responded to pTESS-leg, 53 to TESS-leg, 36 to pTESS-arm, and only 10 to TESS-arm. All versions showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.9), good test–retest reliability (ICC >0.8), moderate to strong correlations with PedsQL, and acceptable average inter-item correlation coefficients (≥0.3). Three factors were extracted for the pTESS-leg, in which all mental items were loaded on one separate factor with factor loadings exceeding 0.4. Active chemotherapy, less than one year from primary surgery, or tibial tumors were associated with significantly inferior pTESS/TESS scores in the lower extremity group.ConclusionThe Egyptian pTESS and TESS are valid and reliable self-reporting tools for assessing the functional outcome following surgeries for extremity bone sarcomas. The modified pTESS and TESS versions, which include additional mental domains, enabled the assessment of the overall health status of our population. Future studies should include a larger sample size and evaluate the ability of pTESS/TESS to track progress over time.

67P Detrimental effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with adult extremity bone sarcoma: Reference center experience

67P Detrimental effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with adult extremity bone sarcoma: Reference center experience

Factors affecting the incorporation of extracorporeally irradiated autograft for the treatment of bone tumours-a retrospective analysis from a tertiary referral centre.

Re-implantation of the tumor bearing autograft following extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT) has been established as an oncologically safe biological reconstruction technique following resection of bone sarcomas. However, factors affecting the ECRT graft-host bone incorporation have not been fully investigated. An insight into the factors that influence graft incorporation can circumvent the complications and increase graft survival. A total of 96 osteotomies in 48 patients with intercalary resections of primary extremity bone sarcomas (mean age 15.8years, mean follow-up 42.1months) were analyzed retrospectively for factors ECRT autograft-host bone union. On univariate analysis, age < 20years, metaphyseal osteotomy site, V-shaped diaphyseal osteotomy, and use of additional plate at diaphyseal osteotomy had a significantly faster time to union, while gender, tumour type, bone involved, resection length, chemotherapy, type of fixation, and use of intra-medullary fibula did not influence union time. In multivariate analysis, V-shaped diaphyseal osteotomy and use of additional plate at diaphyseal ostetomy were the independent factors with favourable time to union. None of the analyzed factors was found to have a significant effect on the union rate. The major complications were non-union in 11.4% patients, graft failure in 2.1%, infection in 12.5%, and soft tissue local recurrences in 14.5% patients. Modified diaphyseal osteotomy and augmentation of the stability of the reconstruction using additional small plates enhance the incorporation of ECRT autograft.

Intermediate-term results and risk factors analysis of tumor endoprosthesis in paediatric patients after the resection of lower extremity bone sarcoma.

Mechanical failure of the endoprostheses is a concern in paediatric patients with primary bone sarcoma. Their long-term results are variable in the Asian population, thus we aim to investigate the outcome by assessing the mechanical failure, its risk factors and the functional results. We retrospectively reviewed 38 paediatric patients (mean 13.29, range 6-18) with primary bone sarcoma of lower extremity undergone chemotherapy and limb salvage surgery with tumor endoprosthesis between 2003 and 2016. All hospital notes were reviewed for any type of failures. Risk factors for implant loosening like stem size, remaining bone length, stem length, extracortical bone bridge ingrowth (EBBI), the ratio of resected bone length to whole bone length, bone stem ratio and custom-made versus modular were analyzed. The limb function was recorded by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Median follow-up time was 7.42years (3.0-15.4years) and minimum follow-up for surviving patients was 2years. Endoprosthesis survivorship, according to Kaplan Meier was 94.7%, 85.4% and 66.2% at 2, 5 and 10years respectively. Type II failure occurred in three patients (7.9%). Type III failure occurred in four patients (10.5%). Type IV failure occured in two patients (5.2%). Only EBBI independently predicted implant loosening (p = .007). Risk factors like stem size, remaining bone length, stem length, the ratio of resected bone length to whole bone length and custom-made versus modular were not associated with increase in implant loosening (p > .05). The mean stem size was 9.41mm in asymptomatic group, comparable with 9.22mm in the failure group (p = .79). The MSTS score was 29.62. Our data suggests that paediatric Chinese patients with small body built had good and excellent mid-term results in implant survival and limb function respectively. EBBI is important in preventing loosening in tumor endoprosthesis. In contrast to the reported higher failure risk with stem size <12mm, we found no increased loosening rate with smaller stem size endoprosthesis. Class III.

Impact of Limb Salvage on Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed With Extremity Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

BackgroundAlthough clinicians and patients with extremity bone and soft tissue (EBST) are increasingly interested in limb salvage surgery (LSS), because of the minimal damage to physical appearance and function, however, there is still a lack of large-scale population studies on whether LSS improves the prognosis of patients.PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the survival of patients with EBST sarcomas after receiving LSS and amputation.MethodsTo conduct the population-based study, we identified 6,717 patients with a histologically diagnosed bone sarcoma and 24,378 patients with a histologically diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We analyzed overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and non-sarcoma survival (NSS) using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test or Gray test, Cox regression model, propensity score-matched analysis, and landmark analysis.ResultsLSS could improve the prognosis in patients with most EBST subtypes, except for Ewing sarcomas and MPNST. However, in the subgroup without distant metastases, limb salvage increased CSS only for patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma, as well as NSS for patients with chondrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that sarcoma survivors surviving <10 years could benefit from LSS but not for long-term survivors ≥10 years. Moreover, for patients with distant metastases, LSS could improve survival of osteosarcoma patients but worsen CSS among patients with MPNST. Landmark analysis further demonstrated that LSS improved survival among osteosarcomas patients with distant metastases only within 1 year after surgery. Moreover, patients receiving LSS and those receiving amputation had a high risk of dying from different non-sarcoma diseases during the postoperative follow-up.ConclusionsThe impact of limb salvage on the prognosis of patients depends on the pathological subtype and stage of EBST sarcomas.

CLO22-094: Leg Length Discrepancy Following Limb Sparing Surgery in Pediatric and Adolescent Lower Extremity Bone Sarcomas: A Case Series

"CLO22-094: Leg Length Discrepancy Following Limb Sparing Surgery in Pediatric and Adolescent Lower Extremity Bone Sarcomas: A Case Series" published on 31 Mar 2022 by National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Outcomes of Planned Marginal and Wide Resection of Sarcomas Associated with Major Vascular Structures in Extremities.

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas of lower and upper extremities may sometimes be in close contact with neurovascular structures. In such cases, it is controversial that whether en bloc resection and vascular reconstruction to reach wider surgical margins or planned marginal resection with the help of adjuvant therapies should be preferred. This study aimed to determine surgical and oncological outcomes of planned marginal and wide resection of extremity sarcomas that are associated with major vascular structures in the extremities. The collected database of 54 patients treated by the same orthopedic and vascular surgeon for primary or locally recurrent soft and bone tissue sarcoma of extremities was retrospectively reviewed. Eligible subjects for this study were patients diagnosed with upper and lower extremity soft and bone tissue sarcomas that encased a maximum of 50% of the circumference of the major vascular structures, requiring limb-sparing resection. When microscopic positive (19 patients, 33.9%) and negative cases' (35 patients, 66.1%) surgical margins were compared, local recurrence, metastasis, amputation, and tumor type (soft/bone) parameters showed no statistically significant difference. When metastatic and non-metastatic patients were compared, it was shown that bone tumors metastasized more than soft tissue tumors (p = 0.001). However, there was no difference between metastasis and amputation, histopathology, grade, nerve involvement, surgical margins, or local recurrences. The mean survival was 1460.6 ± 137.4days, and the 6-year mortality was 87.5%. Anesthetic and surgical complication rates may be higher since en bloc resection surgeries of large tumors with vascular reconstructions take a very long time. Therefore, we suggest marginal resection with sub-adventitial dissection in those locations and wide resection at other areas according to the surgeon's experiences about safe margin with the contribution of radiotherapy.

Socioeconomic factors associated with limb salvage versus amputation for adult extremity bone sarcomas in patients with insurance coverage

BackgroundLimb salvage (LS) has become the preferred treatment for adult patients with bone sarcoma of the extremities. The decision to perform LS versus an amputation is often dictated by tumor characteristics, however there may be socioeconomic factors associated with LS. Previously this has been linked to insurance status, however currently there is a paucity of data examining socioeconomic factors in patients with medical insurance at the time of sarcoma diagnosis. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to examine socioeconomic factors which could be associated with the decision to perform LS versus amputation for adult bone sarcoma patients. MethodsData from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database, was analyzed to identify patients with extremity bone sarcomas from 2006 to 2017. Bivariate regression was used to identify factors associated with LS versus amputation. ResultsOf 1,390 (743 males, 647 female) patients, 252 (18%) under amputation while 1,138 (82%) underwent LS. Lower extremity tumors (OR 4.72, p < 0.001), income <$75,000 (OR 1.85, p = 0.03), being treated a public hospital (OR 1.41, p = 0.04) and a hospital with <200 beds (OR 1.90, p = 0.006) were associated with amputation. Income ≥$125,000 (OR 0.62, 0.04) were associated with LS. ConclusionIn adult patients with medical insurance at the time of diagnosis, socioeconomic and hospital factors were associated with an amputation for bone sarcoma, with poorer patients, and those treated at smaller, and public hospitals more likely to undergo amputation.

Noninvasive Expandable Endoprostheses From Reconstruction to Skeletal Maturity: A Surgical Technique and Lengthening Guide.

Limb salvage is the benchmark for pediatric extremity bone sarcomas. However, reconstructive strategies must account for any anticipated remaining growth potential and the resultant limb inequality. Expandable endoprostheses offer the theoretical advantage of immediate weight-bearing, predictable function, and reliable maintenance of leg-length equality. The evolution of the lengthening mechanism now permits noninvasive lengthening, opposed to the multiple open procedures of the past. These design improvements have contributed to their growing popularity. Experience has indicated that these noninvasive implants more reliably achieve leg-length equality, have longer failure-free survival, and decreased complications, although some have noted gearbox and lengthening failures. Currently, no standardize technique exists for managing patients with noninvasive expandable implants from the time of reconstruction to final lengthening at skeletal maturity. This blueprint aims to provide a detailed surgical technique, lengthening schedule, and recommendations for the mitigation and management of complications to achieve successful limb salvage with noninvasive expandable endoprostheses.

Long-term follow-up of children treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for lower extremity bone sarcoma.

Expandable endoprostheses provide a limb salvage option for skeletally immature patients with bone sarcoma of the lower extremities. Initial reports of the Repiphysis prosthesis were encouraging; however, medium-term follow-up revealed high complication rates. We report on the long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients treated with the Repiphysis prosthesis. Eleven patients were included in the study. Data collected included sex, age at surgery, duration of follow-up, site of disease, histologic diagnosis, number of lengthening sessions, amount lengthened, postoperative complications, endoprosthetic failure, mode of endoprosthetic failure, duration from index surgery to failure and to revision, type of revision surgery and final limb-length discrepancy. The average duration of follow-up from the time of surgery was 180 months (range, 144-215 months). Fifteen Repiphysis implants were used in 11 patients. All implants failed with an average time from surgery to failure of 36 months (range, 3-72 months). Twenty-four complications were observed: one wound dehiscence, two deep infections, 18 mechanical failures, implant collapse with destruction of proximal tibia epiphysis in two and one periprosthetic proximal femur fracture with dislodgement of the stem. Despite being an option for limb salvage, the Repiphysis prosthesis has a high rate of mechanical failure and need for revision, similar to other expandable implants. The authors, therefore, recommend full disclosure of the potential short- and long-term complications and need for revision, as well as alternative treatment options if their use is considered. Level of evidence: IV (Therapeutic).

Extremity bone sarcoma: Evolution from primary amputation to limb salvage surgery (LSS).

e22012 Background: Primary Extremity Bone Sarcomas (PEBS) were historically managed by upfront amputation. Early success rates utilizing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by LSS showed promise in halting disease progression and achieving local control. This prompted surgical oncologists to consider LSS in more patients. In anatomic locations for which no functional reconstruction exists, amputation is still considered the best option. Oncologic control, patient satisfaction and improved function are the primary goals of LSS. Three Dimensional CT and MRI have made for more accurate surgical planning, ensuring adequate margins and improved local control. Methods: Between January 1983 and December 2019 the senior author (BNR) has performed, or mentored over 590 LSS worldwide.Improvement in imaging modalities has been the most important advancement contributing to decreasing tumor margins. Initially bone scans determined the margins at 7cm. In the 1970s CT became the modality used to determine local tumor extent. The resection margins were reduced to 5 cm. The early 90’s saw MRI as the main imaging modality. Margins are now set at 1-2cm.LSS was initiated in the mid 80’s using the strict criteria of age &gt; 13, no metastasis, intramedullary extension less than 50%, and small extraosseus extent. Results: Of the 134 cases enrolled through 1990, the local control rate was 90%. Between July 1991 through December 2019, 388 patients enrolled in bone sarcoma protocols, 354 patients underwent LSS ( &gt; 95%). The primary site was the femur (171 cases, 43%) Histological Diagnosis was OS in 93%. Ages ranged from 3-25 years (median 10.8 years) The average length of tumor resection was 7cms(range 1-38cms). 5 patients presented with pathological fracture. All successfully underwent LSS without an increase in local recurrence. Intraoperative complications included, excessive hemorrhage defined as &gt; 10%of blood volume in 88 patients, 25%, Vascular injuries requiring repair in 9 patients, post operative neuropraxia in 28 patients. Mid and late term complications included, Superficial wound infection in 45 patients (19 requiring some surgical intervention), Deep wound problems were identified in 11 patients ( 3 required subsequent amputation), 9 patients had their prosthesis revised due to refractory infection, Local relapse in 5 patients , &lt; 1%. Long term implant related complications, loosening of the prosthesis in 16 , Stem fracture in 13, nonunion of the allograft in 3 patients. Conclusions: Disadvantages are the need for repeat surgeries consequent to either growth discrepancy, loosening, or implant fracture.LSS is feasible in over 95% of patients, complications are generally manageable. Successful oncologic results, satisfaction and function are readily obtained. Early rehabilitation is key to functional success.

What are the predictors of emergency department utilization and readmission following extremity bone sarcoma resection?

Treatment for bone sarcomas are large undertakings. Emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospital readmissions are a potential target for cost containment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for ED visits and unplanned readmissions following extremity bone sarcoma surgery. Data from Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a national administrative claims database, was analyzed to identify patients with extremity bone sarcomas from 2006 to 2017. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ED visits and readmissions. Of 1390 (743 males, 647 female) adult patients, 137 (12%) visited the ED and 245 (18%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The most common indication for ED visits (n = 63, 45.9%) and readmission (n = 119, 48.5%) were complications of surgery. Length of stay >10 days was associated with ED utilization (OR, 1.83; P = .01) and readmission (OR, 4.47; P < .001). One in ten patients will use the ED, and one in five patients will be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge following extremity bone sarcoma surgery. Length of stay was associated with ED visits and readmission. These patients could be targeted with alternative management strategies in the outpatient setting with early clinical follow-up to minimize readmission.