Extraglottic Airway Devices Research Articles

In-hospital mortality after prehospital endotracheal intubation versus alternative methods of airway management in trauma patients. A cohort study from the TraumaRegister DGU®

PurposePrehospital airway management in trauma is a key component of care and is associated with particular risks. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the gold standard, while extraglottic airway devices (EGAs) are recommended alternatives. There is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness. In this retrospective analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®, we compared ETI with EGA in prehospital airway management regarding in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma.MethodsWe included cases only from German hospitals with a minimum Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 2 and age ≥ 16 years. All patients without prehospital airway protection were excluded. We performed a multivariate logistic regression to adjust with the outcome measure of hospital mortality.ResultsWe included n = 10,408 cases of whom 92.5% received ETI and 7.5% EGA. The mean injury severity score was higher in the ETI group (28.8 ± 14.2) than in the EGA group (26.3 ± 14.2), and in-hospital mortality was comparable: ETI 33.0%; EGA 30.7% (27.5 to 33.9). After conducting logistic regression, the odds ratio for mortality in the ETI group was 1.091 (0.87 to 1.37). The standardized mortality ratio was 1.04 (1.01 to 1.07) in the ETI group and 1.1 (1.02 to 1.26) in the EGA group.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in mortality rates between the use of ETI or EGA, or the ratio of expected versus observed mortality when using ETI.

Does Baska mask deserve its own niche among extraglottic airway devices? A prospective, single-arm study.

A variety of extraglottic airway devices (EADs) are available. Main concerns with EADs are protection against aspiration and ability to ventilate patients with high airway pressures. Baska mask meets these criteria and is the only third-generation device available for clinical use. After institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained, this prospective study was performed in 100 adult patients undergoing surface surgeries at a tertiary referral centre. The primary outcome was the success rate of insertion, while the secondary outcomes were the sealing pressure, stability of the device and the perioperative complications of Baska mask. We then compared it with other currently used EADs. The first attempt at insertion and overall success rates, showed values of 81% and 98%, respectively. Insertion was quick (median 12; interquartile range [IQR] 9-15 s). The mask sealing pressure, was 35 cmH2O (median [IQR 20-50 cmH2O]). Also, the mask remained stable in 95% of patients intraoperatively. Sore throat and dysphagia were seen in 37% and 24% of patients, respectively. No patient had laryngospasm or desaturation at any time. It compared favourably well with other EADs, while achieving higher sealing pressures. We found that the Baska mask performs well with excellent first attempt at insertion and overall success rates, higher sealing pressures and minimal complications compared to currently used EADs in clinical anaesthesia.

Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest – a randomised manikin study

BackgroundAlthough airway management for paramedics has moved away from endotracheal intubation towards extraglottic airway devices in recent years, in the context of COVID-19, endotracheal intubation has seen a revival. Endotracheal intubation has been recommended again under the assumption that it provides better protection against aerosol liberation and infection risk for care providers than extraglottic airway devices accepting an increase in no-flow time and possibly worsen patient outcomes.MethodsIn this manikin study paramedics performed advanced cardiac life support with non-shockable (Non-VF) and shockable rhythms (VF) in four settings: ERC guidelines 2021 (control), COVID-19-guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation (COVID-19-intubation), laryngeal mask (COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask) or a modified laryngeal mask modified with a shower cap (COVID-19-showercap) to reduce aerosol liberation simulated by a fog machine. Primary endpoint was no-flow-time, secondary endpoints included data on airway management as well as the participants‘ subjective assessment of aerosol release using a Likert-scale (0 = no release–10 = maximum release) were collected and statistically compared. Continuous Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Interval-scaled Data were presented as median and Q1 and Q3.ResultsA total of 120 resuscitation scenarios were completed. Compared to control (Non-VF:11 ± 3 s, VF:12 ± 3 s) application of COVID-19-adapted guidelines lead to prolonged no-flow times in all groups (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:17 ± 11 s, VF:19 ± 5 s;p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: VF:15 ± 5 s,p ≤ 0.01; COVID-19-showercap: VF:15 ± 3 s,p ≤ 0.01). Compared to COVID-19-Intubation, the use of the laryngeal mask and its modification with a showercap both led to a reduction of no-flow-time(COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: Non-VF:p = 0.002;VF:p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-Showercap: Non-VF:p ≤ 0.001;VF:p = 0.002) due to a reduced duration of intubation (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:40 ± 19 s;VF:33 ± 17 s; both p ≤ 0.01 vs. control, COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask (Non-VF:15 ± 7 s;VF:13 ± 5 s;p > 0.05) and COVID-19-Shower-cap (Non-VF:15 ± 5 s;VF:17 ± 5 s;p > 0.05). The participants rated aerosol liberation lowest in COVID-19-intubation (median:0;Q1:0,Q3:2;p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask and COVID-19-showercap) compared to COVID-19-shower-cap (median:3;Q1:1,Q3:3 p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask) or COVID-19-laryngeal-mask (median:9;Q1:6,Q3:8).ConclusionsCOVID-19-adapted guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation lead to a prolongation of no-flow time. The use of a modified laryngeal mask with a shower cap seems to be a suitable compromise combining minimal impact on no-flowtime and reduced aerosol exposure for the involved providers.

Cricothyrotomy : Data situation, guidelines and techniques for the definitive surgical airway

Cricothyrotomy represents the final approach to secure the airway, in the course of which less invasive measures have failed. It can also primarily be carried out to establish asecure airway. This is essential to protect the patient from asignificant hypoxia. This is acannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate (CVCO) situation, which presumably all colleagues in emergency intensive care medicine and anesthesia have already been confronted with. Evidence-based algorithms for the management of adifficult airway and CVCO have been established. If oxygenation using an endotracheal tube, an extraglottic airway device or bag-valve mask ventilation all fail, the airway must be surgically secured, i.e. using cricothyrotomy. The prevalence of the CVCO situation in aprehospital setting is ca. 1%. No valid prospective randomized in vivo studies have been carried with respect to the question of the best method.

State of implementation of the Corona-Virus-Disease-2019 resuscitation guidelines : An online-based survey one year after publication in Germany.

The present study evaluated the implementation of the European Resuscitation Council Corona-Virus-Disease 2019 (COVID-19) resuscitation guidelines in Germany 1 year after publication. To evaluate the practical implementation of the COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines in Germany one year after their publication. In an online survey between April and May 2021participants were asked about awareness of COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines, corresponding training, the resuscitation algorithm used and COVID-19 infections of emergency medicine personnel associated with COVID-19 resuscitation. Atotal of 961 (8%) of the 11,000 members took part in the survey and 85% (818/961) of questionnaires were fully completed. While 577 (70%) of the respondents were aware of the COVID-19 guidelines, only 103 (13%) had received respective training. Aspecific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm was used by 265 respondents (32%). Adaptations included personal protective equipment (99%), reduction of staff caring for the patient, or routine use of video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (each 37%), securing the airway before rhythm analysis (32%), and pausing chest compressions during endotracheal intubation (30%). Respondents without aspecific COVID-19 resuscitation algorithm were more likely to use mouth-nose protection (47% vs. 31%; p < 0.001), extraglottic airway devices (66% vs. 55%; p = 0.004) and have more than 4team members close to the patient (45% vs. 38%; p = 0.04). Use of an Filtering-Face-Piece(FFP)-2 or FFP3 mask (89% vs. 77%; p < 0.001; 58% vs. 70%; p ≤ 0.001) or performing primary endotracheal intubation (17% vs. 31%; p < 0.001) were found less frequently and 9% reported that ateam member was infected with COVID-19 during resuscitation. The COVID-19 resuscitation guidelines are still insufficiently implemented 1 year after publication. Future publication strategies must ensure that respective guideline adaptations are implemented in atimely manner.

To compare clinical versus ultrasound assessment of correct placement of ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway (PLMA): a prospective randomized study

Extraglottic airway devices (EAD) have revolutionized the perioperative airway management. The accuracy of clinical tests to identify malposition has been questioned by recent studies where fibreoptic evaluation identified various malpositions that were undiagnosed by a clinical test. Ultrasound (USG) has evolved to guide various airway interventions. However, USG is under-evaluated in the assessment of the EADs position. Our study aimed to compare clinical versus USG assessment of optimal placement of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA). This randomized control trial was done in 212 consenting patients undergoing onco-surgery with PLMA as an airway device. Patients were randomized in Group CL (n-107) and US (n-105). Following primary assessment-using clinical tests and USG evaluation using a scoring system, fibreoptic evaluation of the placement of PLMA was done and then assessed for optimal position. The accuracy of each technique for optimal placement was compared statistically. We found that the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical evaluation were 98.77% and 34.62% with a diagnostic accuracy of 83.18% when compared with fibreoptic evaluation. While USG evaluation using the scoring system has sensitivity and specificity of 95.45% and 29.41% with a diagnostic accuracy of 84.76%. It was noted that USG assessment has a higher positive predictive value (87.5%) as compared to clinical assessment (82.47%). The incidence of rotation was higher in the clinical group. There was no difference in airway related morbidity. USG is comparable to clinical tests for evaluation of the optimal placement of PLMA. However, USG has various advantages over clinical assessment as it is quick and identifies the unacceptable placement of PLMA where the tip of PLMA may not lie over the tip of the esophagus, thereby, avoiding unnecessary mucosal injury during forceful or repeated attempts for gastric drainage tube insertion.Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI/2017/11/010359) dated 3rd November 2017.

CT imaging of extraglottic airway device-pictorial review.

Compared to intubation with a cuffed endotracheal tube, extraglottic airway devices (EGDs), such as laryngeal mask airways, are considered less definitive ventilation conduit devices and are therefore often exchanged via endotracheal intubation (ETI) prior to obtaining CT images. With more widespread use and growing comfort among providers, reports have now described use of EGDs for up to 24 h including cases for which clinicians obtained CT scans with an EGD in situ. The term EGD encompasses a wide variety of devices with more complex structure and CT appearance compared to ETI. All EGDs are typically placed without direct visualization and require less training and time for insertion compared to ETI. While blind insertion generally results in functional positioning, numerous studies have reported misplacements of EGDs identified by CT in the emergency department or post-mortem. A CT-based classification system has recently been suggested to categorize these misplacements in six dimensions: depth, size, rotation, device kinking, mechanical blockage of the ventilation opening(s), and injury from EGD placement. Identifying the type ofEGD and its correct placement is critically important both to provide prompt feedback to clinicians and prevent inappropriate medicolegal problems. In this review, we introduce the main types of EGDs, demonstrate their appearance on CT images, and describe examples of misplacements.

Extraglottic Airway Device Misplacement: A Novel Classification System and Findings in Postmortem Computed Tomography

Extraglottic airway devices are frequently used during cardiac arrest resuscitations and for failed intubation attempts. Recent literature suggests that many extraglottic airway devices are misplaced. The aim of this study is to create a classification system for extraglottic airway device misplacement and describe its frequency in a cohort of decedents who died with an extraglottic airway device in situ. We assembled a cohort of all decedents who died with an extraglottic airway device in situ and underwent postmortem computed tomographic (CT) imaging at the state medical examiner's office during a 6-year period, using retrospective data. An expert panel developed a novel extraglottic airway device misplacement classification system. We then applied the schema in reviewing postmortem CT for extraglottic airway device position and potential complications. We identified 341 eligible decedents. The median age was 47.0 years (interquartile range 32 to 59 years). Out-of-hospital personnel placed extraglottic airway devices in 265 patients (77.7%) who subsequently died out of hospital; the remainder died inhospital. The classification system consisted of 6 components: depth, size, rotation, device kinking, mechanical blockage of ventilation opening, and injury. Under the system, extraglottic airway devices were found to be misplaced in 49 cases (14.4%), including 5 (1.5%) that resulted in severe injuries. We created a novel extraglottic airway device misplacement classification system. Misplacement occurred in greater than 14% of cases. Severe traumatic complications occurred rarely. Quality improvement activities should include review of extraglottic airway device placement when CT images are available and use the classification system to describe misplacements.

Standalone use of Laryngeal mask airway supreme for primary airway management in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: A prospective observational study

Background: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) does not provide definitive airway protection from pulmonary aspiration of potential regurgitated gastric contents. LMA supreme, a recent supraglottic (extraglottic) airway device, shows promising results. Thus, aim of study to evaluate the role of supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) in airway management of patients operated with laparoscopic procedures under general Anaesthesia. Methods: The prospective observational study comprised of 274 patients of ASA grade 1 and 2 scheduled for short elective laparoscopic procedures (&lt;1hr.30min) who provided consent. Patients were anaesthetised according to standard protocol, appropriate size of SLMA was chosen and inserted; and complications were noted. Post SLMA removal, recovery and trauma of throat were noted. Postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting, and throat pain were noted. Binary logistic regression model and Chi-square test of association was performed to analyse data (P&lt;0.05). Results: Most participants were female (n=260) with mean age of 31.42±7.24 years. Mean duration of surgery and recovery time was 37.3±5.84 min and 5.85±1.93 min respectively. SLMA size 3 was commonly used (n=245) and majority of insertions were successful in the first attempt (n=244). Post insertion, SLMA had adequate length (n=208) Throat pain (n=37) and vomiting (n=38) were common post-operative complications observed in the patients. A significant association was observed between operative procedure and complication (P=0.0004) and number of attempts (P=0.0004) with trauma being significant (P=0.0039). Trauma was associated with gender (P=0.08) and body weight (P=0.006). Conclusion: SLMA can be used as a standalone supraglottic (extraglottic) airway device for airway management in laparoscopic surgeries.

Brief Research Report: Prehospital Rapid Sequence Airway

Background Rapid Sequence Airway (RSA) describes the administration of an induction agent and paralytic followed by the intended primary placement of an extraglottic airway device rather than an endotracheal tube. The purpose of this study was to determine the success rates for prehospital RSA. The secondary goal was to determine aspiration rates among patients managed with RSA. Methods Adult and pediatric prehospital RSA cases between 2005 and 2017 reported to an airway quality assurance registry from one ground and one air agency were reviewed. Success was defined as the ability to adequately ventilate patients after extraglottic device placement. Aspiration was defined as radiologic evidence (chest x-ray or CT scan) within 48 hours of hospital presentation. Results 68 patients underwent RSA with a King LTS-D (n = 24), LMA-Supreme (n = 28), Combitube (n = 2), LMA-Unique (n = 8) and iGel (n = 6). Age ranged from 1 year to 73 years with 10 patients less than 18. RSA was successful in 64 (94%) cases; 56 (88%) were successful on first pass and 63 (98%) within 2 attempts. The RSA procedure occurred in an aircraft in 14 (21%) of cases and 71% of patients were in cervical precautions. Duration of EGD insertion prior to hospital arrival ranged from 5 to 102 minutes with an average of 34.5 minutes. Aspiration data was available for 46 patients of whom 4 (8.7%) were found to have evidence of aspiration. Conclusion Overall and first pass RSA success rates were high and aspiration rates were low in this quality assurance registry despite predictors of airway difficulty. RSA may be a reasonable alternative to RSI for prehospital airway management that merits further research.

Factors Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation.

Factors Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation.

A comparison of airway management devices in simulated entrapment-trauma: a prospective manikin study

IntroductionIn the patient entrapped after a motor vehicle collision (MVC), advanced airway management may need to be performed before extrication. The aim of this study was to compare four airway management devices utilized by paramedics in a simulated entrapped patient.MethodsTwenty-six paramedics performed advanced airway management on a manikin seated in the driver’s seat (right side) of a car. Access was through the opened door only. The airway devices were the Macintosh laryngoscope and the Airtraq optical laryngoscope to facilitate the endotracheal intubation (ETI), the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme and the laryngeal tube (LT). Time to first successful ventilation and number of attempts required for successful placement were measured. Following each placement, participants rated the degree of difficulty. For ETI, participants ranked the achieved glottic view using Cormack-Lehane grades (CLG). Finally, participants were asked which airway management device they preferred.ResultsThe LMA Supreme had the shortest mean time to first successful ventilation (16.7 s, CI [0.95] 14.9–18.6). Insertion of the LMA Supreme and ETI with the Macintosh laryngoscope had 100% first-attempt success. The LMA Supreme was rated least difficult to insert (mean score 1.7/10 (CI [0.95] 1.2–2.1)). Compared to the Macintosh, the Airtraq laryngoscope facilitated superior laryngoscopy (CLG I view 46.2% and 80.8%, respectively). Most participants (10/26; 38%) chose the Macintosh laryngoscope as their preferred technique, followed closely by the LMA Supreme (9/26; 35%).ConclusionThe LMA Supreme took the least amount of time and was the easiest to be inserted. Extraglottic airway devices may be beneficial alternative airway management devices to be considered by paramedics in the entrapped patient. Endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope was performed competently by participating paramedics. The Airtraq enabled superior laryngoscopy but resulted in poorer first-pass success rate.

Clinical advance in difficult pediatric airway management

Background Management of a pediatric airway can be a challenge for anesthesiologists, especially for anesthesiologists who did not get special pediatric anesthesia training. Up to now, there are new devices designed specifically for use in pediatric airway management. Also, several algorithms and guidelines specific to the pediatric difficult airway management have been suggested. Objective The aim of this article is to describe clinical advances in difficult pediatric airway management, and give key evaluation on the roles of new devices and techniques in the pediatric airway management. Content This article mainly describes challenges of pediatric airway management, management of anticipated and unanticipated difficult pediatric airways, available devices for managing the pediatric airway and extubation of pediatric patients with a difficult airway. Especially, it is emphasized that the management of both the anticipated and unanticipated difficult pediatric airway requires a forethought plan to reduce the risk of complications and to enhance patient safety. Moreover, the controversies of extra-glottic airway devices(EGAD) and alternative devices to direct laryngoscopy in pediatric airway management are elucidated. Trend Although airway management strategies for children, techniques and equipment are significantly improved during the past few years, management of difficult pediatric airway remains a problem associated with significant risks and complications. In the future, more efforts and multicentre studies are still needed to determine the best practices for managing the difficult pediatric airway Key words: Children; Airway management; Tracheal intubation

Modifiable and Nonmodifiable Factors Associated With Perioperative Failure of Extraglottic Airway Devices.

Extraglottic airway device (EGA) failure can be associated with severe complications and adverse patient outcomes. Prior research has identified patient- and procedure-related predictors of EGA failure. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of perioperative EGA failure at our institution and identified modifiable factors associated with this complication that may be the target of preventative or mitigating interventions. We performed a 5-year retrospective analysis of adult general anesthesia cases managed with EGAs in a single academic center. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify clinically modifiable and nonmodifiable factors significantly associated with 3 different types of perioperative EGA failure: (1) "EGA placement failure," (2) "EGA failure before procedure start," and (3) "EGA failure after procedure start." A total of 19,693 cases involving an EGA were included in the analysis dataset. EGA failure occurred in 383 (1.9%) of the cases. EGA placement failure occurred in 222 (1.13%) of the cases. EGA failure before procedure start occurred in 76 (0.39%) of the cases. EGA failure after procedure start occurred in 85 (0.43%) of the cases. Factors significantly associated with each type of failure and controllable by the anesthesia team were as follows: (1) EGA placement failure: use of desflurane (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-2.25) and EGA size 4 or 5 vs 2 or 3 (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.05-0.10); (2) EGA failure before procedure start: use of desflurane (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.40) and 3 or more placement attempts (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 2.57-8.56); and (3) EGA failure after procedure start: 3 or more placement attempts (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.02-4.16) and increasing anesthesia time (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17-1.55). The overall incidence of EGA failure was 1.9%, and EGA placement failure was the most common type of failure. We also found that use of desflurane and use of smaller EGA sizes in adult patients were factors under the direct control of anesthesia clinicians associated with EGA failure. An increasing number of attempts at EGA placement was associated with later device failures. Our findings also confirm the association of EGA failure with previously identified patient- and procedure-related factors such as increased body mass index, male sex, and position other than supine.

Preliminary Report: Comparing Aspiration Rates between Prehospital Patients Managed with Extraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Intubation

IntroductionThere has been a shift from endotracheal intubation (ETI) toward extraglottic devices (EGDs) for prehospital airway management. A concern exists that this may lead to more frequent cases of aspiration. MethodsThis was a retrospective study using a prehospital quality assurance database. Patients were assigned to groups based on the method that ultimately managed their airways (EGD or ETI). Cases with documented blood/emesis obscuring the airway were considered inevitable aspiration cases and excluded. Aspiration was defined by the radiology report within 48 hours. ResultsA total of 104 EGD and 152 ETI patients were identified. Aspiration data were available for 67 EGD and 94 ETI cases. Of those, 8 EGD and 3 ETI cases had blood/emesis obscuring the airway and were excluded as planned. After exclusions, there were 5 EGD and 11 ETI cases in which aspiration was later diagnosed (EGD aspiration rate = 8%, ETI aspiration rate = 12%; χ2: P = .359; relative risk = .841; 95% confidence interval, .329-2.152). ConclusionIn this small quality assurance database, aspiration rates were not significantly different for prehospital patients managed with an EGD versus ETI.

Extraglottic airway devices: is the classification in generations really informative of properties and safety?

Extraglottic airway devices: is the classification in generations really informative of properties and safety?

Ultrasound comparison of external and internal neck anatomy with the LMA Unique.

IntroductionInternal neck anatomy landmarks and their relation after placement of an extraglottic airway devices have not been studied extensively by the use of ultrasound. Based on our group experience with external landmarks as well as internal landmarks evaluation with other techniques, we aimed use ultrasound to analyze the internal neck anatomy landmarks and the related changes due to the placement of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique.MethodsObservational pilot investigation. Non-obese adult patients with no evidence of airway anomalies, were recruited. External neck landmarks were measured based on a validated and standardized method by tape. Eight internal anatomical landmarks, reciprocal by the investigational hypothesis to the external landmarks, were also measured by ultrasound guidance. The internal landmarks were re-measured after optimal placement and inflation of the extraglottic airway devices cuff Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique.ResultsSix subjects were recruited. Ultrasound measurements of hyoid-mental distance, thyroid-cricoid distance, thyroid height, and thyroid width were found to be significantly (p < 0.05) overestimated using a tape measure. Sagittal neck landmark distances such as thyroid height, sternal-mental distance, and thyroid-cricoid distance significantly decreased after placement of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique.ConclusionThe laryngeal mask airway Unique resulted in significant changes in internal neck anatomy. The induced changes and respective specific internal neck anatomy landmarks could help to design devices that would modify their shape accordingly to areas of greatest displacement. Also, while external neck landmark measurements overestimate their respective internal neck landmarks, as we previously reported, the concordance of each measurement and their respective conversion factor could continue to be of help in sizing extraglottic airway devices. Due to the pilot nature of the study, more investigations are warranted.

Extraglottic airway devices: technology update.

Extraglottic airway devices (EADs) have revolutionized the field of airway management. The invention of the laryngeal mask airway was a game changer, and since then, there have been several innovations to improve the EADs in design, functionality, safety and construction material. These have ranged from changes in the shape of the mask, number of cuffs and material used, like rubber, polyvinylchloride and latex. Phthalates, which were added to the construction material in order to increase device flexibility, were later omitted when this chemical was found to have serious adverse reproductive outcomes. The various designs brought out by numerous companies manufacturing EADs resulted in the addition of several devices to the airway market. These airway devices were put to use, many of them with inadequate or no evidence base regarding their efficacy and safety. To reduce the possibility of compromising the safety of the patient, the Difficult Airway Society (DAS) formed the Airway Device Evaluation Project Team (ADEPT) to strengthen the evidence base for airway equipment and vet the new extraglottic devices. A preuse careful analysis of the design and structure may help in better understanding of the functionality of a particular device. In the meantime, the search for the ideal EAD continues.

Bougie assisted endotracheal intubation using the Air-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway: A prospective randomized clinical study

BackgroundAir-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway is an extraglottic airway device used as a primary airway tool or as an adjunct to tracheal intubation. The bougie is a simple flexible device that might increase the success rate of endotracheal intubation either blindly or through a supraglottic device. We hypothesized that using bougie guided intubation through air-Q™ can improve the success rate with minimal complications.MethodsOne hundred and forty patients of either sex, >18 years old, ASA I-II scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to one of two groups of 70 patients each. Blind tracheal intubation was performed through air-Q™ with bougie assistance (Group B) or without (Group Q). In both groups, 3 attempts were allowed for successful device insertion. After obtaining normal capnographic wave, 3 more attempts were tried for intubation with or without bougie guidance. Lung ventilation through air-Q™ was permitted between intubation attempts. If tracheal intubation through air-Q™ was unsuccessful, it was performed by direct laryngoscopy.ResultsAir-Q™ time, ease, attempts number of insertion and ventilation grade were comparable between both groups. Total intubation time was significantly longer in group-B (P = 0.001) while overall success rate for intubation was comparable (64.3%). Group-B showed significant (P = 0.001) higher incidence of complications (trauma (P = 0.023), sore throat (P = 0.001), dysphonia (P = 0.023) and dysphagia (P = 0.001)) as compared with group-Q. In spite of significant decrease in both heart rate and mean arterial pressure in both groups after air-Q™ insertion, yet there was significant increase in both parameters after intubation compared to baseline values (P < 0.05) which was more prominent in group-B than in group-Q. Significant increase in HR and MAP was elicited after bougie placement in group-B (P < 0.01).ConclusionBougie guided tracheal intubation through air-Q™ didn’t improve overall success rate with significant longer time, hemodynamic derangement and traumatic sequelae.

Extraglottic Airways in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 17-01 28 August 2017.

Extraglottic airway (EGA) devices have been used by both physicians and prehospital providers for several decades. The original TCCC Guidelines published in 1996 included a recommendation to use the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an option to assist in securing the airway in Tactical Evacuation (TACEVAC) phase of care. Since then, a variety of EGAs have been used in both combat casualty care and civilian trauma care. In 2012, the Committee on TCCC (CoTCCC) and the Defense Health Board (DHB) reaffirmed support for the use of supraglottic airway (SGA) devices in the TACEVAC phase of TCCC, but did not recommend a specific SGA based on the evidence available at that point in time. This paper will use the more inclusive term "extraglottic airway" instead of the term "supragottic airway" used in the DHB memo. Current evidence suggests that the i-gel® (Intersurgical Complete Respiratory Systems; http://www.intersurgical.com/info/igel) EGA performs as well or better than the other EGAs available and has other advantages in ease of training, size and weight, cost, safety, and simplicity of use. The gel-filled cuff in the i-gel both eliminates the need for cuff pressure monitoring during flight and reduces the risk of pressure-induced neuropraxia to cranial nerves in the oropharynx and hypopharynx as a complication of EGA use. The i-gel thus makes the medic's tasks simpler and frees him or her from the requirement to carry a cuff manometer as part of the medical kit. This latest change to the TCCC Guidelines as described below does the following things: (1) adds extraglottic airways (EGAs) as an option for airway management in Tactical Field Care; (2) recommends the i-gel as the preferred EGA in TCCC because its gel-filled cuff makes it simpler to use than EGAs with air-filled cuffs and also eliminates the need for monitoring of cuff pressure; (3) notes that should an EGA with an air-filled cuff be used, the pressure in the cuff must be monitored, especially during and after changes in altitude during casualty transport; (4) emphasizes COL Bob Mabry's often-made point that extraglottic airways will not be tolerated by a casualty unless he or she is deeply unconscious and notes that an NPA is a better option if there is doubt about whether or not the casualty will tolerate an EGA; (5) adds the use of suction as an adjunct to airway management when available and appropriate (i.e., when needed to remove blood and vomitus); (6) clarifies the wording regarding cervical spine stabilization to emphasize that it is not needed for casualties who have sustained only penetrating trauma (without blunt force trauma); (7) reinforces that surgical cricothyroidotomies should not be performed simply because a casualty is unconscious; (8) provides a reminder that, for casualties with facial trauma or facial burns with suspected inhalation injury, neither NPAs nor EGAs may be adequate for airway management, and a surgical cricothyroidotomy may be required; (9) adds that pulse oximetry monitoring is a useful adjunct to assess airway patency and that capnography should also be used in the TACEVAC phase of care; and (10) reinforces that a casualty's airway status may change over time and that he or she should be frequently reassessed.