To the Editor: The chance of recovery from vegetative state (VS) 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is close to zero, i.e., it is permanent, PVS [5, 14]. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the midbrain or thalamus failed to improve awareness in PVS patients [15]. Yet, imaging studies suggest the potential for cognitive processing in a subset of patients and potentially recruitable cortical regions [6–9, 11]. Isolated thalamocortical ‘‘island’’ circuits may be working in PVS [6–9, 11]. We now find that bifocal, extradural cortical stimulation (b-ECS), a very safe minimally invasive surgical method [2–4], can restore conscious contents in the PVS. The present result differs from recent reports of an improvement of the minimally conscious state by DBS [13]: it is known that PVS and the MCS are different physiological entities, with large-scale ‘‘higher order’’ cortical activation on functional neuroimaging in MCS, normally not observed in PVS patients, a much better prognosis for the MCS even past 12 months, and sporadic, weak, inconsistent, but clearly intentional actions in MCS, but not PVS [9]. This female (born in 1988) was diagnosed as permanently vegetative following a car crash in January 2005. During the first week post-injury, her Glasgow Coma Scale was 5–6. She underwent right decompressive hemicraniectomy (with flap replaced at a later date) and went on to receive intensive neurorehabilitation for more than 1 year, to no avail. In August 2007, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) at the median nerve demonstrated absent N20/P25 components on both sides. Structural MRI showed a supratentorial right lateral ventricular enlargement due to scar retraction and signs of encephalomalacia on that side. On examination, the patient stared blankly in front of her, without any sign of visual pursuit. The defensive blink reflex was completely absent. Repeated verbal commands were not obeyed, even when given by familiar voices. Sporadic spontaneous movements of the four limbs were noted. Her head was often turned to the right, with the left arm flexed and her spastic left leg extended. Spastic retraction of the left arm was observed following nociceptive stimuli, with hyperextension of both legs. The patient was completely unable to localize external stimuli. She was scored 25 (category 9) on the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). This patient’s parents gave surrogate informed consent to surgery after Inner Review Board approval. After induction of general anesthesia, a double, parallel, sigmoid incision of the skin overlying the target areas was performed in August 2007. The left side was elected, i.e., the side contralateral to her previous hemicraniectomy. The sulcus between the left parietal gyri P1 and P2 and the middle frontal sulcus (F2), including Brodmann’s areas 8 and 46 (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, DLPFC), were targeted under neuronavigation guidance. Four burr holes were fashioned, and two stimulating paddles were inserted extradurally (Lamitrode 4, ANS). The paddles were linked via a dual extension to a subclavearly pocketed pulse generator (IPG) (Genesis, ANS). One week post-surgery, stimulation was started simultaneously on both channels. Over the following 10 months, the patient was assessed by an independent third party who was totally blind to the procedure on nine occasions at 1-month intervals, after which parameters could be reset. S. Canavero B. Massa-Micon F. Cauda Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group (TANG), Turin, Italy