Extracorporeal Procedures Research Articles

Albumin and platelet loss during the application of CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: a post-hoc analysis of the Cyto-SOLVE trial.

Adsorption devices like CytoSorb® (CS) are increasingly used in critically ill patients. However, potential adverse effects have not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this post-hoc analysis of the monocentric prospective Cyto-SOLVE study was to examine albumin concentration and platelet count during the application of CS in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different indications for CS therapy. 29 Adult ICU patients receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy and CS application for 12 hours were included. Albumin concentration and platelet count were measured before, during, and after application. Changes in albumin concentration and platelet count were investigated. Since 10/29 patients were substituted with platelets during CS therapy and 20/29 received albumin, subgroup analysis was performed in patients receiving no platelet concentrate and <20g albumin substitution during CS application. The dependent sample t-test was used to detect significant (p<0.05) changes over time and multivariate models were investigated. We observed a significant reduction in platelets (p=0.005, mean 14 G/l, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4 - 23G/l) during CS therapy with an even more pronounced drop in those 19 patients without platelet substitution (p=0.001, mean 22G/l, 95% CI 10 - 34). No significant change was detected in the albumin concentration of all patients. However, a significant albumin decrease was observed in those 17 patients with less than 20g albumin substitution during CS therapy (p=0.007, mean 0.17g/dL, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.29). No other potential covariates for the decrease could be identified in a multivariate model. Since a drop in albumin and platelets occurred during the use of CS, an increased substitution might be necessary. Knowledge of potential side effects is of great importance to prevent harm during the use of extracorporeal procedures. This knowledge should be considered for a reliable risk-benefit assessment in the future.

Extracorporeal treatment in poisoning

In rare cases, intoxicated patients may require an extracorporeal procedure for enhanced toxin elimination. The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup provides consensus- and evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of extracorporeal procedures in the management of critically ill, poisoned patients, with ongoing updates. Extracorporeal clearance is highest for low molecular weight substances with low volume of distribution, low plasma protein binding, and high water-solubility. To maximize the effect of extracorporeal clearance, blood and dialysate flow rates should be as high as possible, and the membrane with the largest surface area should be utilized. Intermittent hemodialysis is the most commonly employed extracorporeal procedure due to its highest effectiveness, while hemodynamically compromised patients can benefit from acontinuous procedure.

Hemadsorption to Contain Postoperative Cell-Free Hemoglobin and Haptoglobin Preservation for Extended Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time in Cardiac Surgery for Acute Kidney Injuries Prevention.

Prevention of acute kidney injury during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still a challenge and has been the object of numerous studies. The incidence of acute kidney injury in the context of CPB is related to a multifactorial etiology. The role of hemadsorption in relation to cell-free hemoglobin and haptoglobin preservation is not well defined in the literature on CPB during cardiac surgery procedures. This is a single-center pilot randomized report including 20 patients undergoing elective CPB procedures with an expected time > 120 minutes for each extracorporeal procedure. Patients were randomly allocated to either standard of care (n=10) or Jafron HA380 (n=10) during CPB. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injuries. The Jafron study group vs. control group reported postoperative values for cell-free hemoglobin at 10 minutes after CPB (mg/L) (11.6 ± 0.6 vs. 29.9 ± 0.3) (P-value 0.021), haptoglobin 10 minutes after CPB (mg/dl) (129.16 ± 1.22 vs. 59.17 ± 1.49) (P-value 0.017), creatinine peak after CPB (mg/dL) (0.92 ± 0.17 vs. 1.32 ± 0.9) (P-value 0.030), and acute kidney injury after 48 hours (number of patients) (one vs. four) (P-value 0.027). This pilot study suggested that the use of Hemoperfusion Cartridge HA380 Jafron for extended CPB time for complex cardiac surgery procedures was safe and effective and is associated with a better postoperative preservation of haptoglobin with a reduction of cell-free hemoglobin values and less incidence of acute kidney injury, though larger studies are warranted to confirm our result.

Kidney replacement and conservative therapies in rhabdomyolysis: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundToxic renal effects of myoglobin following rhabdomyolysis can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) with the necessity of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Fast elimination of myoglobin seems notable to save kidney function and intensify kidney repair. Clinical data regarding efficacy of KRT in critical care patients with rhabdomyolysis and AKI are limited. This retrospective analysis aimed to identify differences between conservative therapy and different modalities of KRT regarding myoglobin elimination and clinical outcome.MethodsThis systematic, retrospective, single-center study analyzed 328 critical care patients with rhabdomyolysis (myoglobin > 1000 µg/l). Median reduction rate of myoglobin after starting KRT was calculated and compared for different modalities. Multivariate logistic regression models were established to identify potential confounder on hospital mortality. Filter lifetime of the various extracorporeal circuits was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier curves.ResultsFrom 328 included patients 171 required KRT. Health condition at admission of this group was more critical compared to patient with conservative therapy. Myoglobin reduction rate did not differ between the groups (KRT 49% [30.8%; 72.2%] vs. conservative treatment (CT) 61% [38.5%; 73.5%]; p = 0.082). Comparison between various extracorporeal procedures concerning mortality showed no significant differences. Hospital mortality was 55.6% among patients with KRT and 18.5% with CT (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression model identified requirement for KRT (OR: 2.163; CI: 1.061–4.407); p = 0.034) and the SOFA Score (OR: 1.111; CI: 1.004–1.228; p = 0.041) as independent predictive factors for hospital mortality. When comparing specific KRT using multivariate regression, no benefit was demonstrated for any treatment modality. Life span of the extracorporeal circuit was shorter with CVVH compared to that of others (log-Rank p = 0.017).ConclusionsThis study emphasizes that AKI requiring KRT following rhabdomyolysis is accompanied by high mortality rate. Differences in myoglobin reduction rate between various KRTs could not be confirmed, but CVVH was associated with reduced filter lifetime compared to other KRTs, which enable myoglobin elimination, too.Graphical

Recent advances in microfluidic cell separation to enable centrifugation-free, low extracorporeal volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients.

Leukapheresis is a common extracorporeal procedure for leukodepletion and cellular collection. During the procedure, a patient's blood is passed through an apheresis machine to separate white blood cells (WBCs) from red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets (PLTs), which are then returned to the patient. Although it is well-tolerated by adults and older children, leukapheresis poses a significant risk to neonates and low-weight infants because the extracorporeal volume (ECV) of a typical leukapheresis circuit represents a particularly large fraction of their total blood volume. The reliance of existing apheresis technology on centrifugation for separating blood cells limits the degree to which the circuit ECV could be miniaturized. The rapidly advancing field of microfluidic cell separation holds excellent promise for devices with competitive separation performance and void volumes that are orders of magnitude smaller than their centrifugation-based counterparts. This review discusses recent advancements in the field, focusing on passive separation methods that could potentially be adapted to perform leukapheresis. We first outline the performance requirements that any separation method must meet to replace centrifugation-based methods successfully. We then provide an overview of the passive separation methods that can remove WBCs from whole blood, focusing on the technological advancements made in the last decade. We describe and compare standard performance metrics, including blood dilution requirements, WBC separation efficiency, RBC and PLT loss, and processing throughput, and discuss the potential of each separation method for future use as a high-throughput microfluidic leukapheresis platform. Finally, we outline the primary common challenges that must still be overcome for these novel microfluidic technologies to enable centrifugation-free, low-ECV leukapheresis in the pediatric setting.

When mechanical ventilation fails-Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is predominantly being used as a rescue strategy in patients with acute lung failure, suffering from severe oxygenation and/or decarboxylation impairment. Cannulas introduced into the central veins lead blood through a membrane oxygenator in which it is oxygenated via sweep gas (pO2 up to 600 mm Hg) flow, eliminating CO2. According to the largest randomized studies carried out so far, the two most important indications for VV-ECMO are hypoxic respiratory failure (paO2 < 80 mm Hg for more than 6 h) and refractory hypercapnia (pH < 7.25 und pCO2 > 60 mm Hg with a breathing frequency of >30/min) despite optimal protective mechanical ventilation settings (ARDS, Δp < 14 mbar, plateau pressure < 30 mbar, tidal volume VT < 6 ml/kg idealized body weight). Relative contraindications are life-limiting comorbidities and terminal pulmonary diseases that cannot be treated by lung transplantation. Advanced patient age is not regarded as an absolute contraindication, though it highly impacts ARDS survival rates, especially for pneumonia associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The most frequent complications of VV-ECMO include bleeding, thrombus formation and rare cases of cannula-associated infections. Its use in nonintubated patients (awake ECMO) is possible in specific cases and has proven valuable as a bridge to lung transplant approach. Some ECMO centers offer cannulation of a patient at primary care hospitals, facilitating subsequent transport to the center (ECMO transport). The COVID-19 pandemic not only caused the number of VV-ECMO runs to skyrocket but has also drawn public attention to this extracorporeal procedure. Strict quality control to improve vvECMO outcomes according to the German hospital reform is urgently needed, especially so since the technique has a high demand in resources and bears significant risks when performed by untrained personnel.

PULM5: Hyperbaric Blood Oxygenation – Basic Considerations and First Results

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is beneficial in several applications, but hyperbaric chambers are scarce. We are developing a novel technology for extracorporeal hyperbaric blood oxygenation (HBOX). This extracorporeal procedure uses pressure to increase the oxygen (O2) concentration in blood. The technology can provide support when large amounts of oxygen are needed: In the treatment of CO poisoning the dissolved oxygen displaces the CO from the blood, removing it from the organism. This way, the oxygen deficiency can be ended rapidly, reducing or preventing secondary damage that frequently occurs. In acute respiratory failure (ARF) the HBOX technology can support lung function, by significantly increasing oxygen transport across a specific membrane area, while maintaining adequate CO2-removal. The prototype of the HBOX consists of 2 roller pumps with a hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator (HFMO) placed in between, a control unit for gas and blood flow and a double lumen catheter. By varying the flow rates of the roller pumps, excess pressure is generated in the HFMO without causing significant blood damage. Simultaneously, the oxygen pressure in the HFMO is increased, allowing for hyperbaric oxygenation. To avoid bubble formation, either O2 increase is limited, or excess O2 is removed in second HFMO before reinfusion. The prototype was tested in-vitro using porcine blood that was either CO poisoned or conditioned to mimic ARF. In acute in-vivo experiments for CO poisoning, we used CO-poisoned pigs (ca. 75 kg, COHb = 43 %, n = 3). For in-vivo experiments for ARF, 70 kg sheep were used with ventilator settings simulating respiratory failure, resulting in SaO2 = 69 %, paCO2 = 72 mmHg (n = 2). In-vitro test results show that the HBOX can fully oxygenate hypoxic blood (sO2 ca. 40 %) with a hilite 800 LT at a flow rate of 2 L/min, which is twice the amount of oxygen transferred, compared to conventional mode, Fig. 1. In in-vivo trials, the CO elimination rate from the animals’ blood doubled when using HBOX + oxygen mask compared to oxygen mask alone, see Fig. 2. In the ARF trials, the HBOX approach resulted in SaO2 of 89, 95, and 99 % and paCO2 was 49, 46, and 39 mmHg at blood flows of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 L/min, respectively, see Fig. 3. The HBOX is a promising approach to increase oxygen transport across a specific membrane area. The increased oxygen levels can be used for efficient extracorporeal CO removal. For respiratory support, the hyperbaric technology adds a new dimension to ECMO treatment, allowing the use of smaller oxygenators, potentially reducing the need for anticoagulation, as well as inflammatory responses and thus invasiveness. The hyperbaric technology can be used gradually, so that the membrane efficiency can be increased during intervention. This allows us to build an oxygenator with an ideal flow distribution over a wide range of blood flows, which avoids thrombus formation in the device at lower blood flows.Figure 1. Laboratory results oxygenation performanceFigure 2. Elimination rate COHb in in-vivo trialsFigure 3. Arterial blood gases during in-vivo trial for ARF

Oxygen therapy in intensive care

Pulse oximetry has high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting hypoxemia. Arterial blood gas analyses are the gold standard for monitoring O2 therapy. Venous blood gas analyses should not be used in this setting. TARGET VALUES OF O2 THERAPY: The target range of acute O2 therapy for ventilated patients and nonventilated patients not at risk of hypercapnia should be between 92% and 96% for oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry. Indications for high-dose O2 therapy without a target range in critical care include carbon monoxide poisoning and patients with severe respiratory distress when SpO2 cannot be derived. Hyperoxemia, i.e., SpO2 values above 96%, has not improved survival in randomized trials of predominantly ventilated ICU patients. Under hyperoxemia in nonventilated patients at risk of hypercapnia (e.g., patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), one in three patients is at risk of increasing carbon dioxide. Therefore, a target SpO2 of 88-92% should be aimed for in these patients. O2 TARGET RANGES ON EXTRACORPOREAL PROCEDURES: There are no randomized studies recommending other SpO2 target ranges for patients on extracorporeal procedures. These patients should always be monitored with arterial blood gases-in the case of peripheral VA-ECMO on the right arm and downstream of the oxygenator. HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN THERAPY FOR ACUTE HYPERCAPNIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE: High-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC) was not associated with reduced in-hospital mortality compared with conventional O2 in a meta-analysis of predominantly patients with acute hypoxemia (type I respiratory failure), although intubation rates were reduced. Also, in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (type II), HFNC with high flow rates is not inferior to noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Ethylene oxide-type hypersensitivity reactions in G-CSF mobilized, peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell donors and review.

Ethylene oxide (EtO) is a volatile, ringed toxic ether used to sterilize heat-labile plastics including apheresis sets. In the 1980s, EtO-associated severe hypersensitivity reactions during hemodialysis led to widespread adoption of alternative sterilization for dialysis kits but not apheresis tubing sets. We now report several cases of EtO-type hypersensitivity reactions in autologous donors undergoing hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (HPCC). A 10-year retrospective review of allergic EtO-type reactions in adults undergoing HPCC on the COBE Spectra and SPECTRA Optia was performed. Donor medical history and absolute eosinophil counts were compared between cases and 34 HPCC controls. Published EtO reactions during extracorporeal procedures were reviewed with statistical analysis. Graphics and statistics were performed using commercial software. Three autologous HPCC donors experienced EtO-type reactions within 15 min of initiating HPCC, for a 10-year incident rate of 0.08% per procedure and 0.18% per donor. All three reactions occurred using the Spectra Optia and IDL tubing set, for an Optia/IDL specific rate of 0.2% per procedure and 0.5% per donor. There was no correlation between EtO reactions, eosinophil counts, or saline prime dwell times. No patient had classic predisposing risk factors for EtO hypersensitivity. Two patients required medical intervention whereas the third responded by pausing the procedure and slowing the inlet rate. EtO-type hypersensitivity reactions can be observed during HPCC, especially with the Optia IDL tubing set. EtO reactions may be missed due to their rarity and staff unfamiliarity with this clinical entity.

Hemoperfusion and plasmapheresis in the intensive care unit

In addition to kidney replacement procedures, several other extracorporeal procedures are employed in the intensive care unit. Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal was the predominant treatment used for removal of toxins from the 1970s until the millennium. Nowadays, this treatment does no longer play aclinically meaningful role as even strongly protein-bound toxins can be removed by effective dialysis procedures in case poisoning. The concept of acytokine adsorber was introduced 10years ago, which is directed towards withstanding the cytokine storm. Despite negative data from prospective randomized controlled studies, its use is steadily increasing in Germany. Atotally different treatment concept is the biomimetic pathogen adsorber, which removes bacteria, viruses and fungi from the bloodstream by binding to immobilized heparin. Whether this rapid reduction of the pathogen load translates into an improvement of clinically relevant endpoints is unclear, as prospective randomized controlled studies are lacking. For the early hours of septic shock a very old procedure, plasmapheresis, has recently regained interest. The results of two large randomized controlled studies in this setting from Europe and Canada will become available in 2025/2026. The rationale to use plasma exchange in early sepsis is that this procedure not only removes cytokines but also replenishes reduced levels of protective factors, such as angiopoietin‑1, adisintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type1 motif, member13 (ADAMTS-13) and proteinC, if fresh plasma is used as exchange fluid. All afore mentioned procedures do not only have a different mode of action but are also used at seperate time points of bloodstream infections and/or sepsis.

Robotic-assisted mobilization for an effective mobilization in a COVID-19 patient with ECMO treatment

An effective (early) mobilization in COVID-19 intensive care patients with ECMO treatment is very important. Sedation, extracorporeal procedures with the danger of circuit malfunction, large lumen ECMO cannulas with a risk of dislocation and a very severe neuromuscular weakness are factors that could deem mobilization beyond stage 1 of the ICU mobility score (IMS) in some cases difficult or impossible; however, early mobilization is a key point of the ABCDEF bundle to counteract pulmonary complications, neuromuscular dysfunction and enable recovery. The case of a 53-year-old, previously healthy and active male patient with a severe and complicated course of COVID-19 and pronounced ICU-acquired weakness is described. While receiving ECMO the patient could be mobilized using a robotic system. Due to severe and rapidly progressing pulmonary fibrosis, additional low-dose methylprednisolone therapy (Meduri protocol) was implemented. Under this multimodal treatment the patient was successfully weaned from the ventilator and decannulated. Robotic assisted mobilization has the potential to be a novel and safe therapeutic option for a customized and highly effective mobilization in ECMO patients.

Crooked nose-extracorporeal septoplasty to the rescue: case report

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;The nasal dorsum necessitates intervention at the level of its underlying septal support, in marked deformities, to achieve an acceptable outcome. Conventional intranasal septal access gives limited correction in severe deviations and often an extracorporeal approach is required. This technique, improves the individual’s nasal airway as well as the nasal aesthetics, even in the most advanced deformities. The extracorporeal procedure was undertaken in a robust gentleman with a gross internal and external deformity with a satisfactory result.&lt;/p&gt;

Hämoperfusion und Plasmapherese auf der Intensivstation

In addition to kidney replacement procedures, several other extracorporeal procedures are employed in the intensive care unit. Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal was the predominant treatment used for removal of toxins from the 1970s until the millennium. Nowadays, this treatment does no longer play a clinically meaningful role as even strongly protein-bound toxins can be removed by effective dialysis procedures in case poisoning. The concept of a cytokine adsorber was introduced 10 years ago, which is directed towards withstanding the cytokine storm. Despite negative data from prospective randomized controlled studies, its use is steadily increasing in Germany. A totally different treatment concept is the biomimetic pathogen adsorber, which removes bacteria, viruses and fungi from the bloodstream by binding to immobilized heparin. Whether this rapid reduction of the pathogen load translates into an improvement of clinically relevant endpoints is unclear, as prospective randomized controlled studies are lacking. For the early hours of septic shock a very old procedure, plasmapheresis, has recently regained interest. The results of two large randomized controlled studies in this setting from Europe and Canada will become available in 2025/2026. The rationale to use plasma exchange in early sepsis is that this procedure not only removes cytokines but also replenishes reduced levels of protective factors, such as angiopoietin‑1, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS-13) and protein C, if fresh plasma is used as exchange fluid. All afore mentioned procedures do not only have a different mode of action but are also used at seperate time points of bloodstream infections and/or sepsis.

Negative alactic base excess is reversed by hemoperfusion in septic patients

Introduction: Gattinoni et al. have recently introduced a new parameter: the “alactic base excess” (ABE). ABE is equivalent to the number of strong acids, other than lactate, which are present in the plasma in abnormal concentrations, negative ABE being associated with higher mortality in sepsis. Hemoperfusion (HPF) is an extracorporeal procedure that involves the passage of blood through an adsorption cartridge, where solutes are removed by direct binding to the sorbent material. Then, it was decided to explore the influence of HPF on negative ABE value in sepsis. Materials and methods: Basal values of ABE, standard base excess (SBE), and lactate (mean, standard deviation [SD]) were obtained. The difference between these parameter values before and after four sessions of HPF (HA330) (delta value) was evaluated. Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon test were applied. Results: From 32 patients (age: 57±13) suffering from respiratory insufficiency secondary to COVID-19 who were treated with HPF in the critical care unit of Clinica de la Mujer, Bogotá (Colombia), 6 patients presented with metabolic acidosis with negative ABE value (‒2.7±1) with negative SBE (‒4.7±1) and high lactate serum value (2±0.7 mmol/L). Delta ABE, SBE, and lactate were: 7.7 (p = 0.005), 6.1 (p = 0.003), and 1.6 (p = NS), respectively. Thus, negative ABE was significantly reversed by HPF, since SBE value turned positive without significant change in lactate. Conclusion: Negative alactic parameter was significantly reversed by HPF in septic patients. It is necessary to carry out evaluations in larger groups to estimate their impact on clinical outcomes.

Thrombocytopenia in the ICU before and during the pandemic of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19: a comparative retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Thrombocytopenia is common in critically ill patients. Its development is associated with a high risk of bleeding and other complications, including adverse outcomes. ОBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence, severity, predictive significance of thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients before and during coronavirus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The observational study included patients from intensive care units of a multidisciplinary hospital at different periods: before the COVID-19 and during the period when the hospital was operating as a СOVID hospital. Patients from all intensive care units, excluding the hematology unit, were analyzed. RESULTS: Non-infectious period. Among 314 patients, 91 cases of thrombocytopenia were identified, representing 29 %. Severe thrombocytopenia among them was noted in 35 % (n = 32). The main etiological causes: performing extracorporeal procedures, liver disease, ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome. The infectious period. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently than in non-COVID patients (in 209 of 396 patients — 52.8 %) and was more uniform in severity. The most frequent cause of thrombocytopenia was a combination of sepsis, acute liver injury, performance of extracorporeal procedures and specific drug therapy of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, thrombocytopenia in the intensive care units of a multidisciplinary hospital (non-infectious period) occurred in one-third of critically ill patients. COVID 19 infection demonstrated an increased incidence of thrombocytopenia in critical patients (in the presented study up to half of the patients). Severe thrombocytopenia is more common in patients of non-infectious period (35 % vs 20%). In patients with coronavirus infection, thrombocytopenia was more frequently associated with a bleeding clinic (6.2 % vs 2.2 %), with less prognostic value as a criterion for adverse outcome: the presence of thrombocytopenia increased the risk of death by 5.5 times (95 % CI 2.979–10.031) in noninfectious and by 1.54 times (95 % CI 1.3–1.82) in COVID-19 infection.

Acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy: terminology standardization.

The Department of Acute Kidney Injury (IRA) of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology prepared this document for the purpose of standardizing AKI terminology and dialysis modalities in the Portuguese language for Brazil. Several terms with similar meanings have been used in AKI and its dialysis modalities, causing confusion and disparities among patients, nephrologists, health institutions, private care companies, insurance companies and government entities. These disparities can impact medical care, hospital organization and care, as well as the funding and reimbursement of AKI-related procedures. Thus, consensual nomenclature and definitions were developed, including the definitions of AKI, acute kidney disease (AKD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Additionally, we addressed all dialysis modalities and extracorporeal procedures related to AKI, currently approved and available in the country. The Brazilian Society of Nephrology hopes that this Consensus can standardize the terminology and provide technical support to all involved in AKI care in Brazil.

Multitargeted interventions to reduce dialysis-induced systemic stress.

ABSTRACTHemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining therapy as well as an intermittent and repetitive stress condition for the patient. In ridding the blood of unwanted substances and excess fluid from the blood, the extracorporeal procedure simultaneously induces persistent physiological changes that adversely affect several organs. Dialysis patients experience this systemic stress condition usually thrice weekly and sometimes more frequently depending on the treatment schedule. Dialysis-induced systemic stress results from multifactorial components that include treatment schedule (i.e. modality, treatment time), hemodynamic management (i.e. ultrafiltration, weight loss), intensity of solute fluxes, osmotic and electrolytic shifts and interaction of blood with components of the extracorporeal circuit. Intradialytic morbidity (i.e. hypovolemia, intradialytic hypotension, hypoxia) is the clinical expression of this systemic stress that may act as a disease modifier, resulting in multiorgan injury and long-term morbidity. Thus, while lifesaving, HD exposes the patient to several systemic stressors, both hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic in origin. In addition, a combination of cardiocirculatory stress, greatly conditioned by the switch from hypervolemia to hypovolemia, hypoxemia and electrolyte changes may create pro-arrhythmogenic conditions. Moreover, contact of blood with components of the extracorporeal circuit directly activate circulating cells (i.e. macrophages–monocytes or platelets) and protein systems (i.e. coagulation, complement, contact phase kallikrein–kinin system), leading to induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and resulting in chronic low-grade inflammation, further contributing to poor outcomes. The multifactorial, repetitive HD-induced stress that globally reduces tissue perfusion and oxygenation could have deleterious long-term consequences on the functionality of vital organs such as heart, brain, liver and kidney. In this article, we summarize the multisystemic pathophysiological consequences of the main circulatory stress factors. Strategies to mitigate their effects to provide more cardioprotective and personalized dialytic therapies are proposed to reduce the systemic burden of HD.

Management algorithms and artificial intelligence systems for cardiopulmonary bypass.

This article introduces management algorithms to support operators in choosing the best strategy for metabolic management during cardiopulmonary bypass using artificial intelligence systems. We developed algorithms for the identification of the optimal way for assessing metabolic parameters. Different management algorithms for extracorporeal procedures interfaced with metabolic monitoring systems already exist on the market and are applied in clinical practice. These algorithms could provide guidance for selecting the best metabolic strategy with the aim at reducing human error and optimizing management.

Successful Bridging to Recovery Using the Prometheus® Liver Support in a Critical Ill COVID-19 Patient with Acute Liver Failure: A Case Report

Liver impairment is frequently reported in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected patients and contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. We report of a 44-year-old male patient with hypoxic and cholestatic liver failure after an initially complicated course of COVID-19 pneumonia with moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 3 with Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT), thromboembolic intestinal ischemia with subtotal colectomy and partial resection of the small intestine and septic shock. After considerable clinical improvement we initiated extracorporeal liver support due to progressive hyperbilirubinemia up to 25,3 mg/dl. Within 17 days we conducted 11 sessions of extracorporeal liver support by Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption (FPSA; Prometheus®) until stabilization of liver function occurred. After 52 days of intensive care treatment and successful weaning from ventilation and KRT, the patient was transferred to an Intermediate Care (IMC) unit. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a COVID-19 patient successfully treated with prolonged extracorporeal liver support. Extracorporeal procedures that support liver function should be considered as bridging to recovery in selected COVID-19 patients if liver failure presents a dominant organ dysfunction.

MO668EXTRACORPOREAL REMOVAL OF MYOGLOBIN IN PATIENTS WITH RHABDOMYOLYSIS AND SEVERE ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY: COMPARISON OF HIGH AND MEDIUM CUT-OFF MEMBRANE AND AN ADSORBER CARTRIDGE

Abstract Background and Aims Severe rhabdomyolysis often causes acute kidney injury (AKI). If severe, AKI significantly reduces myoglobin removal through the kidneys. Given molecular size of myoglobin, extracorporeal removal using newer hemodialysis membranes and adsorption techniques is possible, although its role on clinically significant outcomes is not yet fully established. We aimed to compare the efficacy of high cut-off (HCO) membrane, medium cut-off (MCO) membrane and Cytosorb® adsorber on myoglobin removal. Method In this retrospective study we included 15 patients with AKI and concomitant rhabdomyolysis with severely increased myoglobin (&amp;gt;20.000 µg/L), who underwent at least one extracorporeal procedure with the intention of extracorporeal myoglobin removal. There were 28 procedures performed: 13 HCO (Theralite®, Gambro) dialysis, 9 MCO (Theranova®, Gambro) dialysis and 6 adsorber (Cytosorb®, Cytosorbents) procedures. Serum myoglobin and albumin levels were recorded from the time frame of up to 12 hours prior to and up to 12 hours after the index procedure and reduction rates (RR) for myoglobin were calculated. Albumin levels were compared before and after procedure as a safety parameter. Results Treatment duration differed significantly and was the longest for Cytosorb® adsorber (median 11 h) and the shortest for MCO membrane (median 5 h). Pre-treatment serum myoglobin levels were comparable across the groups. Reduction in myoglobin during procedure was significant for HCO and MCO and borderline significant in adsorber group, with respective median RR of 0.64, 0.54 and 0.50 (p = 0.83). Routine albumin substitution was implemented only in HCO group, but serum albumin levels were stable in all subgroups. Conclusion In this preliminary observational study we found comparable effectiveness of a novel MCO and ‘standard’ HCO dialysis membrane for serum myoglobin removal in patients with severe AKI. Cytokine adsorber showed borderline effectiveness, but the number of procedures in this group was small. MCO dialysis is associated with lower costs and no need for albumin supplementation and therefore might be the optimal mode of treatment of severe rhabdomyolysis-associated AKI. For patients with multiorgan failure requiring cytokine removal and severe myoglobinemia, hemoadsorption can reduce cytokine and myoglobin levels simultaneously.