Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Patients Research Articles

Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Predictor of Neurologic Outcomes in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Patients

Background: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has traditionally been used as a biomarker to predict neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of NSE in predicting neurologic outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Methods: This observational cohort study included 47 consecutive adult ECPR patients (median age, 59.0 years; 74.5% males) treated between January 2018 and December 2021 at a tertiary extracorporeal life support center. The primary outcome was a poor neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3–5 at hospital discharge. Results: Twelve (25.5%) patients had abnormal findings on computed tomography of the brain. A poor neurologic outcome was demonstrated in 22 (46.8%) patients. The NSE level at 72 h after ECPR showed the best prediction power for a poor neurologic outcome compared with NSE at 24 and 48 h. A cutoff value exceeding 61.9 μg/L for NSE at 72 h yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.791 for predicting poor neurologic outcomes and exceeding 62.1 μg/L with an AUC of 0.838 for 30-day mortality. Conclusions: NSE levels at 72 h after ECPR appear to be a reliable biomarker for predicting poor neurologic outcomes and 30-day mortality in ECPR patients.

Actual Cost of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Study.

To determine the actual cost and drivers of the cost of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) care cycle. A time-driven activity-based costing study conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. A quaternary care ICU providing around-the-clock E-CPR service for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Australia. The E-CPR care cycle was defined as the time from initiating E-CPR to hospital discharge or death of the patient. Detailed process maps with discrete steps and probabilistic decision nodes accounting for the complex trajectories of E-CPR patients were developed. Data about clinical and nonclinical resources and timing of activities was collected multiple times for each process . Total direct costs were calculated using the time estimates and unit costs per resource for all clinical and nonclinical resources. The total direct costs were combined with indirect costs to obtain the total cost of E-CPR. From 10 E-CPR care cycles observed during the study period, a minimum of 3 observations were obtained per process. The E-CPR care cycle's mean (95% CI) cost was $75,014 ($66,209-83,222). Initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ECMO management constituted 18% of costs. The ICU management (35%) and surgical costs (20%) were the primary cost determinants. IHCA had a higher mean (95% CI) cost than OHCA ($87,940 [75,372-100,570] vs. 62,595 [53,994-71,890], p < 0.01), mainly because of the increased survival and ICU length of stay of patients with IHCA. The mean cost for each E-CPR survivor was $129,503 ($112,422-147,224). Significant costs are associated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The cost of E-CPR for IHCA was higher compared with the cost of E-CPR for OHCA. The major determinants of the E-CPR costs were ICU and surgical costs. These data can inform the cost-effectiveness analysis of E-CPR in the future.

Risk of sepsis after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock from the RESCUE registry

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Objectives It is known that the incidence of sepsis is higher in patients receiving extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). In particular, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is performed in emergency situations, which may increase the likelihood of non-aseptic management compared to routine procedures. So, we investigated the association of ECPR and incidence of sepsis in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Background Pre- and post-ECPR sepsis are associated with increased mortality, and it is known that the occurrence of sepsis after ECPR is higher than in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, it is not well known whether ECPR has a higher incidence of sepsis than ECMO insertion in non-CPR conditions. Method The SMART-RESCUE study is a multi-center, retrospective and prospective registry of patients that presented with CS. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 1,247 patients with CS were enrolled from 12 major centers in Korea. The incidence of sepsis was compared by dividing into two groups according to whether or not ECPR was performed. Patients with ECMO duration less than 48 hours were excluded. Result Total of 231 patients(mean age 59.46 years, men 67.70%, mead follow-up duration 136.5 days) were analyzed into ECPR group(n=95, 60.7 ± 13.0 years, men 75.8%) and non-ECPR group(n=136, 58.6 ± 15.5 years, men 65.4%) respectively. ECPR group showed lower SBP, lower DBP, lower HR, more shock caused by ischemia, more smoking, lower LVEF, higher Hb, higher serum Na, lower AST, higher Peak troponin I, higher vasoactive inotropic score, higher ICMP portion. After 1:1 propensity score matching corrected for height, SBP, DBP, Hb, initial pump flow, Na, ICMP, vasoactive inotropic score, difference remained in SBP, DBP, HR, cause of shock. Sepsis incidence was 7.4%. The risk for sepsis incidence was not different between two groups(7.4% vs 6.3%, adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.38-3.65, p=0.774). Conclusion ECPR procedure does not increase sepsis compared to ECMO insertion not in CPR state in patients with cardiogenic shock. Keyword: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, sepsis, cardiogenic shockBaseline characteristicsAdjusted outcomes

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score matching, observational study.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly performed as an adjunct to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the specific benefits of ECPR concerning survival with favorable neurological outcomes remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the potential advantages of ECPR in the management of refractory OHCA. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involved OHCA patients between January 2016 and May 2021. Patients were categorized into ECPR or CCPR groups. The primary endpoint assessed was survival with favorable neurological outcomes, and the secondary outcome was survival rate. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, with and without 1:2 propensity score matching, were employed to assess ECPR's effect. In total, 1193 patients were included: 85underwent ECPR, and 1108 received CCPR. Compared to the CCPR group, the ECPR group exhibited notably higher survival rate (29.4% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001). The ECPR group also exhibited a higher proportion of survival with favorable neurological outcome than CCPR group (17.6% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ECPR correlated with increased odds of survival with favorable neurological outcome (adjusted odds ratio: 13.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.60-40.06). Following propensity score matching, the ECPR group showed significantly elevated odds of survival with favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio: 13.31; 95% CI 1.61-109.9). This study demonstrated that in comparison to CCPR, ECPR may provide survival benefit and increase the odds of favorable neurological outcomes in selected OHCA patients.

Fluid balance during acute phase extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes in OHCA patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

The association between fluid balance and outcomes in patients who underwent out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) remains unknown. We aimed to examine the above relationship during the first 24 h following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We performed a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective multicenter study involving OHCA patients aged ≥ 18 years treated with ECPR between 2013 and 2018 and who received fluid therapy following ICU admission. Fluid balance was calculated based on intravenous fluid administration, blood transfusion, and urine output. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included unfavorable outcome (cerebral performance category scores of 3-5 at discharge), acute kidney injury (AKI), and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Overall, 959 patients met our inclusion criteria. In-hospital mortality was 63.6%, and the proportion of unfavorable outcome at discharge was 82.0%. The median fluid balance in the first 24 h following ICU admission was 3673 mL. Multivariable analysis revealed that fluid balance was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.06; p < 0.001), unfavorable outcome (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; p = 0.005), AKI (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001), and RRT (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001). Excessive positive fluid balance in the first day following ICU admission was associated with in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcome, AKI, and RRT in ECPR patients. Further investigation is warranted.

A national multi centre pre-hospital ECPR stepped wedge study; design and rationale of the ON-SCENE study

BackgroundThe likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation with conventional advanced life support is known to have an exponential decline and therefore neurological outcome after 20 min in patients with a cardiac arrest is poor. Initiation of venoarterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) during resuscitation might improve outcomes if used in time and in a selected patient category. However, previous studies have failed to significantly reduce the time from cardiac arrest to ECMO flow to less than 60 min. We hypothesize that the initiation of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Services System (HEMS) will reduce the low flow time and improve outcomes in refractory Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients.MethodsThe ON-SCENE study will use a non-randomised stepped wedge design to implement ECPR in patients with witnessed OHCA between the ages of 18–50 years old, with an initial presentation of shockable rhythm or pulseless electrical activity with a high suspicion of pulmonary embolism, lasting more than 20, but less than 45 min. Patients will be treated by the ambulance crew and HEMS with prehospital ECPR capabilities and will be compared with treatment by ambulance crew and HEMS without prehospital ECPR capabilities. The primary outcome measure will be survival at hospital discharge. The secondary outcome measure will be good neurological outcome defined as a cerebral performance categories scale score of 1 or 2 at 6 and 12 months.DiscussionThe ON-SCENE study focuses on initiating ECPR at the scene of OHCA using HEMS. The current in-hospital ECPR for OHCA obstacles encompassing low survival rates in refractory arrests, extended low-flow durations during transportation, and the critical time sensitivity of initiating ECPR, which could potentially be addressed through the implementation of the HEMS system. When successful, implementing on-scene ECPR could significantly enhance survival rates and minimize neurological impairment.Trial registrationClinicaltyrials.gov under NCT04620070, registration date 3 November 2020.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Liver Transplant in Children: A Review of the ELSO Registry.

There are minimal data describing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pediatric patient after a liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed at describing ECMO run in this specific situation using the data from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2022. We described patients' characteristics at ECMO initiation, outcome and mortality risk factors. We identified 27 patients with a median age of 2.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 1.5-9.9). Main indication for ECMO support was respiratory (14/27 [52%]) followed by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (7/27 [26%]) and cardiac (6/27 [22%]). Overall in-hospital mortality was 63% (17/27). Mortality rate according to ECMO indications was 50% for both respiratory and cardiac failure and reached 100% for ECPR patients. Overall, nonsurvivors experienced significantly more complications under ECMO support (p = 0.007). Main on-ECMO complications were hemorrhagic (11/27 [41%]) and thrombotic (7/27 [26%]). No clinical or biologic factors was predictive of patients' outcome. Our results suggest that ECMO support is a viable option for cardiac and respiratory indications after pediatric LT. Occurrence of complications while on ECMO are associated with unfavorable outcomes. The extremely high mortality rate in ECPR patients merits further research.

Association between pupillary examinations and prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

BackgroundIn some cases of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), negative pupillary light reflex (PLR) and mydriasis upon hospital arrival serve as common early indicator of poor prognosis. However, in certain patients with poor prognoses inferred by pupil findings upon hospital arrival, pupillary findings improve before and after the establishment of ECPR. The association between these changes in pupillary findings and prognosis remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association of pupillary examinations before and after the establishment of ECPR in patients with OHCA showing poor pupillary findings upon hospital arrival with their outcomes. To this end, we analysed retrospective multicentre registry data involving 36 institutions in Japan, including all adult patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR between January 2013 and December 2018. We selected patients with poor prognosis inferred by pupillary examinations, negative pupillary light reflex (PLR) and pupil mydriasis, upon hospital arrival. The primary outcome was favourable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between favourable neurological outcome and pupillary examination after establishing ECPR.ResultsOut of the 2,157 patients enrolled in the SAVE-J II study, 723 were analysed. Among the patients analysed, 74 (10.2%) demonstrated favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Multivariable analysis revealed that a positive PLR at ICU admission (odds ration [OR] = 11.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 5.17–24.7) was significantly associated with favourable neurological outcome. However, normal pupil diameter at ICU admission (OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.52–2.32) was not significantly associated with favourable neurological outcome.ConclusionAmong the patients with OHCA who underwent ECPR and showed poor pupillary examination findings upon hospital arrival, 10.2% had favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. A positive PLR after the establishment of ECPR was significantly associated with favourable neurological outcome.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Lessons learned from recent clinical trials.

Cardiac arrest is a leading contributor to morbidity and mortality in the United States. Survival has been historically dependent on high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and rapid defibrillation. However, a large percentage of patients remain in refractory cardiac arrest despite adherence to structured advanced cardiac life support algorithms in which these factors are emphasized. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming an increasingly used rescue therapy for patients in refractory cardiac arrest to restore oxygen delivery by extracorporeal CPR (ECPR). Recently published clinical trials have provided new insights into ECPR for patients who sustain an outside hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In this narrative review, we summarize the rationale for, results of, and remaining questions from these recently published clinical trials. The existing observational data combined with the latest clinical trials suggest ECPR improves mortality in patients in refractory arrest. However, a mixed methodstrial is essential to understand the complexity, context, and effectiveness of implementing an ECPR program.

Prophylactic distal perfusion catheter and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study

PurposeThe effect of a prophylactic distal perfusion catheter (DPC) after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the association between prophylactic DPC and prognosis in patients with OHCA undergoing ECPR. Materials and methodsA secondary analysis of the Study of Advanced Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan (SAVE-J II) database was performed to compare groups of patients with and without prophylactic DPCs. A multivariate analysis of survival at discharge was performed using factors that were significant in the two-arm comparison. ResultsA total of 2044 patients were included in the analysis after excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. Survival at discharge was observed in 548 (26.9%) patients. In total, 100 (4.9%) patients developed limb ischemia, among whom 14 (0.7%) required therapeutic intervention. Multivariate analysis showed that prophylactic DPC did not result in a significant difference in survival at discharge (odds ratio: 0.898 [0.652–1.236], p = 0.509). ConclusionsThe implementation of prophylactic DPC after ECPR for patients with OHCA may not contribute to survival at discharge.

Left-Ventricular Unloading With Impella During Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is the implementation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) during refractory cardiac arrest. The role of left-ventricular (LV) unloading with Impella in addition to VA-ECMO ("ECMELLA") remains unclear during ECPR. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize patients with ECPR receiving LV unloading and to compare in-hospital mortality between ECMELLA and VA-ECMO during ECPR. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and abstract websites of the three largest cardiology societies (American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology). Observational studies with adult patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving ECPR with ECMELLA or VA-ECMO until July 2023 according to the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. Patient and treatment characteristics and in-hospital mortality from 13 study records at 32 hospitals with a total of 1014 ECPR patients. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were computed with the Mantel-Haenszel test using a random-effects model. Seven hundred sixty-two patients (75.1%) received VA-ECMO and 252 (24.9%) ECMELLA. Compared with VA-ECMO, the ECMELLA group was comprised of more patients with initial shockable electrocardiogram rhythms (58.6% vs. 49.3%), acute myocardial infarctions (79.7% vs. 51.5%), and percutaneous coronary interventions (79.0% vs. 47.5%). VA-ECMO alone was more frequently used in pulmonary embolism (9.5% vs. 0.7%). Age, rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and low-flow times were similar between both groups. ECMELLA support was associated with reduced odds of mortality (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.30-0.91]) and higher odds of good neurologic outcome (OR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.17-4.22]) compared with VA-ECMO support alone. ECMELLA therapy was associated with numerically increased but not significantly higher complication rates. Primary results remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. ECMELLA support was predominantly used in patients with acute myocardial infarction and VA-ECMO for pulmonary embolism. ECMELLA support during ECPR might be associated with improved survival and neurologic outcome despite higher complication rates. However, indications and frequency of ECMELLA support varied strongly between institutions. Further scientific evidence is urgently required to elaborate standardized guidelines for the use of LV unloading during ECPR.

Early Cardiac Arrest Hemodynamics, End-Tidal C o2 , and Outcome in Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Secondary Analysis of the ICU-RESUScitation Project Dataset (2016-2021).

Cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during active extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a method to rescue patients refractory to standard resuscitation. We hypothesized that early arrest hemodynamics and end-tidal C o2 (ET co2 ) are associated with survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome in pediatric ECPR patients. Preplanned, secondary analysis of pediatric Utstein, hemodynamic, and ventilatory data in ECPR patients collected during the 2016-2021 Improving Outcomes from Pediatric Cardiac Arrest study; the ICU-RESUScitation Project (ICU-RESUS; NCT02837497). Eighteen ICUs participated in ICU-RESUS. There were 97 ECPR patients with hemodynamic waveforms during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. None. Overall, 71 of 97 patients (73%) were younger than 1 year old, 82 of 97 (85%) had congenital heart disease, and 62 of 97 (64%) were postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Forty of 97 patients (41%) survived with favorable neurologic outcome. We failed to find differences in diastolic or systolic blood pressure, proportion achieving age-based target diastolic or systolic blood pressure, or chest compression rate during the initial 10 minutes of CPR between patients who survived with favorable neurologic outcome and those who did not. Thirty-five patients had ET co2 data; of 17 survivors with favorable neurologic outcome, four of 17 (24%) had an average ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg and two (12%) had a maximum ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg during the initial 10 minutes of resuscitation. We did not identify an association between early hemodynamics achieved by high-quality CPR and survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic outcome after pediatric ECPR. Candidates for ECPR with ET co2 less than 10 mm Hg may survive with favorable neurologic outcome.

Mortality risk factors in patients receiving ECPR after cardiac arrest: Development and validation of a clinical prognostic prediction model

BackgroundPrevious studies have shown an increasing trend of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) use in patients with cardiac arrest (CA). Although ECPR have been found to reduce mortality in patients with CA compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR), the mortality remains high. This study was designed to identify the potential mortality risk factors for ECPR patients for further optimization of patient management and treatment selection. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicentre study collecting 990 CA patients undergoing ECPR in 61 hospitals in China from January 2017 to May 2022 in CSECLS registry database. A clinical prediction model was developed using cox regression and validated with external data. ResultsThe data of 351 patients meeting the inclusion criteria before October 2021 was used to develop a prediction model and that of 68 patients after October 2021 for validation. Of the 351 patients with CA treated with ECPR, 227 (64.8%) patients died before hospital discharge. Multivariate analysis suggested that a medical history of cerebrovascular diseases, pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole and higher Lactate (Lac) were risk factors for mortality while aged 45–60, higher pH and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during ECPR have protective effects. Internal validation by bootstrap resampling was subsequently used to evaluate the stability of the model, showing moderate discrimination, especially in the early stage following ECPR, with a C statistic of 0.70 and adequate calibration with GOF chi-square = 10.4 (p = 0.50) for the entire cohort. Fair discrimination with c statistic of 0.65 and good calibration (GOF chi-square = 6.1, p = 0.809) in the external validation cohort demonstrating the model's ability to predict in-hospital death across a wide range of probabilities. ConclusionRisk factors have been identified among ECPR patients including a history of cerebrovascular diseases, higher Lac and presence of PEA or asystole. While factor such as age 45–60, higher pH and use of IABP have been found protective against in-hospital mortality. These factors can be used for risk prediction, thereby improving the management and treatment selection of patients for this resource-intensive therapy.

High incidence of acute kidney injury in extracorporeal resuscitation, Leading to poor prognosis

BackgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients have a high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients are more likely to develop AKI than ECMO patients because of serious injury during cardiac arrest (CA). ObjectivesThis study aims to assess the occurrence and outcomes of AKI in ECPR and ECMO, and to identify specific risk factors and clinical implications of AKI in ECPR. MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study from a single tertiary care hospital in Gwangju, Korea. Adults (≥18 years) who received ECMO with cardiac etiology in the emergency and inpatient departments from January 2015 to December 2021 were included. The patients (n = 169) were divided into two groups, ECPR and ECMO without CA, and the occurrence of AKI was investigated. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were six-month cerebral performance category (CPC) and AKI during hospitalization. ResultsThe incidence of AKI was significantly higher with ECPR (67.5 %) than with ECMO without CA (38.4 %). ECPR was statistically significant for Expire (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.45, 95 % CI 1.28–4.66) and Poor CPC (2.59, 1.32–5.09). AKI was also statistically significant for Expire (6.69, 3.37–13.29) and Poor CPC (5.45, 2.73–10.88). AKI was the determining factor for the outcomes of ECPR (p = 0.01). ConclusionsECPR patients are more likely to develop AKI than ECMO without CA patients. In ECPR patients, AKI leads to poor outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should be careful not to develop AKI in ECPR patients.

In-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an analysis by time-dependent propensity score matching using a nationwide database in Japan

BackgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been proposed as a rescue therapy for patients with refractory cardiac arrest. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ECPR and clinical outcomes among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using risk-set matching with a time-dependent propensity score.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of the JAAM-OHCA registry data, a nationwide multicenter prospective study of patients with OHCA, from June 2014 and December 2019, that included adults (≥ 18 years) with OHCA. Initial cardiac rhythm was classified as shockable and non-shockable. Patients who received ECPR were sequentially matched with the control, within the same time (minutes) based on time-dependent propensity scores calculated from potential confounders. The odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 30-day survival and 30-day favorable neurological outcomes were estimated for ECPR cases using a conditional logistic model.ResultsOf 57,754 patients in the JAAM-OHCA registry, we selected 1826 patients with an initial shockable rhythm (treated with ECPR, n = 913 and control, n = 913) and a cohort of 740 patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm (treated with ECPR, n = 370 and control, n = 370). In these matched cohorts, the odds ratio for 30-day survival in the ECPR group was 1.76 [95%CI 1.38–2.25] for shockable rhythm and 5.37 [95%CI 2.53–11.43] for non-shockable rhythm, compared to controls. For favorable neurological outcomes, the odds ratio in the ECPR group was 1.11 [95%CI 0.82–1.49] for shockable rhythm and 4.25 [95%CI 1.43–12.63] for non-shockable rhythm, compared to controls.ConclusionECPR was associated with increased 30-day survival in patients with OHCA with initial shockable and even non-shockable rhythms. Further research is warranted to investigate the reproducibility of the results and who is the best candidate for ECPR.Graphical

Risk of sepsis after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock from the RESCUE registry

Abstract Objectives It is known that the incidence of sepsis is higher in patients receiving extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). In particular, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is performed in emergency situations, which may increase the likelihood of non-aseptic management compared to routine procedures. So, we investigated the association of ECPR and incidence of sepsis in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Background Pre- and post-ECPR sepsis are associated with increased mortality, and it is known that the occurrence of sepsis after ECPR is higher than in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, it is not well known whether ECPR has a higher incidence of sepsis than ECMO insertion in non-CPR conditions. Method The SMART-RESCUE study is a multi-center, retrospective and prospective registry of patients that presented with CS. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 1,247 patients with CS were enrolled from 12 major centers in Korea. The incidence of sepsis was compared by dividing into two groups according to whether or not ECPR was performed. Patients with ECMO duration less than 48 hours were excluded. Result Total of 231 patients(mean age 59.46 years, men 67.70%, mead follow-up duration 136.5 days) were analyzed into ECPR group(n=95, 60.7 ± 13.0 years, men 75.8%) and non-ECPR group(n=136, 58.6 ± 15.5 years, men 65.4%) respectively. ECPR group showed lower SBP, lower DBP, lower HR, more shock caused by ischemia, more smoking, lower LVEF, higher Hb, higher serum Na, lower AST, higher Peak troponin I, higher vasoactive inotropic score, higher ICMP portion. After 1:1 propensity score matching corrected for height, SBP, DBP, Hb, initial pump flow, Na, ICMP, vasoactive inotropic score, difference remained in SBP, DBP, HR, cause of shock. Sepsis incidence was 7.4%. The risk for sepsis incidence was not different between two groups(7.4% vs 6.3%, adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.38-3.65, p=0.774). Conclusion ECPR procedure does not increase sepsis compared to ECMO insertion not in CPR state in patients with cardiogenic shock.Adjusted Baseline CharacteristicsAdjusted Outcomes

Survey on the application of external cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Chinese children with sudden cardiac arrest

Objectives: To investigate the current application status and implementation difficulties of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in children with sudden cardiac arrest. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 35 hospitals. A Children's ECPR Information Questionnaire on the implementation status of ECPR technology (abbreviated as the questionnaire) was designed, to collect the data of 385 children treated with ECPR in the 35 hospitals. The survey extracted the information about development of ECPR, the maintenance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) machine, the indication of ECPR, and the difficulties of implementation in China. These ECPR patients were grouped based on their age, the hospital location and level, to compare the survival rates after weaning and discharge. The statistical analysis used Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance for the comparison between the groups, LSD method for post hoc testing, and Bonferroni method for pairwise comparison. Results: Of the 385 ECPR cases, 224 were males and 161 females. There were 185 (48.1%) survival cases after weaning and 157 (40.8%) after discharge. There were 324 children (84.2%) receiving ECPR for cardiac disease and 27 children (7.0%) for respiratory failure. The primary cause of death in ECPR patients was circulatory failure (82 cases, 35.9%), followed by brain failure (80 cases, 35.0%). The most common place of ECPR was intensive care unit (ICU) (278 cases, 72.2%); ECPR catheters were mostly inserted through incision (327 cases, 84.9%). There were 32 hospitals (91.4%) had established ECMO emergency teams, holding 125 ECMO machines in total. ECMO machines mainly located in ICU (89 pieces, 71.2%), and the majority of hospitals (32 units, 91.4%) did not have pre-charged loops. There were no statistically significant differences in the post-withdrawal and post-discharge survival rates of ECPR patients among different age groups, regions, and hospitals (all P>0.05). The top 5 difficulties in implementing ECPR in non-ICU environments were lack of ECMO machines (16 times), difficulty in placing CPR pipes (15 times), long time intervals between CPR and ECMO transfer (13 times), lack of conventional backup ECMO loops (10 times), and inability of ECMO emergency teams to quickly arrive at the site (5 times). Conclusion: ECPR has been gradually developed in the field of pediatric critical care in China, and needs to be further standardized. ECPR in non-ICU environment remains a challenge.

Eligibility of cardiac arrest patients for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and their clinical characteristics: a retrospective two-centre study.

Sudden cardiac arrest has a high incidence and often leads to death. A treatment option that might improve the outcomes in refractory cardiac arrest is Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR). This study investigates the number of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients eligible to ECPR and identifies clinical characteristics that may help to identify which patients benefit the most from ECPR. A retrospective two-centre study was conducted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. All IHCA and OHCA patients between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2020 were screened for eligibility to ECPR. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients eligible to ECPR and patients treated with ECPR. The secondary outcome was the comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients eligible to ECPR treated with conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CCPR) vs. those of patients treated with ECPR. Out of 1246 included patients, 412 were IHCA patients and 834 were OHCA patients. Of the IHCA patients, 41 (10.0%) were eligible to ECPR, of whom 20 (48.8%) patients were actually treated with ECPR. Of the OHCA patients, 83 (9.6%) were eligible to ECPR, of whom 23 (27.7%) were actually treated with ECPR. In the group IHCA patients eligible to ECPR, no statistically significant difference in survival was found between patients treated with CCPR and patients treated with ECPR (hospital survival 19.0% vs. 15.0% respectively, 4.0% survival difference 95% confidence interval -21.3 to 28.7%). In the group OHCA patients eligible to ECPR, no statistically significant difference in-hospital survival was found between patients treated with CCPR and patients treated with ECPR (13.3% vs. 21.7% respectively, 8.4% survival difference 95% confidence interval -30.3 to 10.2%). This retrospective study shows that around 10% of cardiac arrest patients are eligible to ECPR. Less than half of these patients eligible to ECPR were actually treated with ECPR in both IHCA and OHCA.

Lethal abdominal compartment syndrome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a case report

BackgroundClinical attempts of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have increased in recent years; however, it also has life-threatening complications. Massive fluid and transfusion resuscitation, shock status, or low cardiac output status during ECPR may lead to ascites and interstitial edema, resulting in secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).Case presentationA 43-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency department due to cardiac arrest. Due to refractory ventricular fibrillation, ECPR was initiated. Approximately, 3 h after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, abdominal distension and rigidity developed. Therefore, ACS was suspected. Decompression laparotomy was required to relieve elevated intra-abdominal pressure.ConclusionsWe report a case of a patient with OHCA who developed lethal ACS after ECPR. Despite this, the patient was able to recover from several major crises. Regardless of how lethal the patient is, if compartment syndrome develops in any part of the body, we should aggressively consider surgical decompression.

Problems and puzzles in current extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) refers to the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to ensure the perfusion of important organs after the traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) has not obtained the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Such cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is called ECPR. ECPR can benefit some patients with cardiac arrest, however, there are still some problems and puzzles in the implementation of ECPR, such as the implementation location of ECPR patients? Select mechanical press or manual press before ECPR start? Can ECPR be used in special patients, such as traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), aortic dissection and immunosuppressed patients? The age limit of ECPR and the ethical issues related to ECPR. Based on the research status at home and abroad, this paper analyzes and expounds these problems, hoping to provide new ideas for the research and application of ECPR by the majority of domestic colleagues engaged in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.