Extracapsular Hip Fractures Research Articles

Management of Failed Fixation of Extracapsular Hip Fractures.

Background Extracapsular hip fractures are routinely treated with fixation, and the majority heal without complication. The fixation fails in a minority of cases, typically either by 'cutting out' of the superior femoral heador through breakage of the metalwork following non-union. In such cases, if operative treatment is thought appropriate, there are two major treatment options: revision fixation of the fractureor joint replacement surgery. Methods Medline on OvidSP was searched using relevant medical-specific subject headings (MeSH) and keywords. The inclusion criteria were: study regarding management of failed extracapsular hip fracture fixation (not osteoarthritis alone, following such surgery), mean age >60 years, comparative study of joint replacement vs. revision fixation. The search returned 1053 results, of which twowere relevant. Both studies were considered poor quality and neither study was randomised. Instead, outcomes from the current Hospital Trust were used instead through a prospectively generated trauma database. Results From the trauma database, 37 patients (mean age 81), of whom 21 had received cephalomedullary nails and the remainder dynamic hip screw (DHS), were identified. Fourteen patients underwent revision fixation (seven cephalomedullary nail; seven blade plate), while 23 underwent hip replacement (17 total hip replacement; six hemiarthroplasty). Although the difference did not reach statistical significance according to the log-rank test (p = 0.233), there is a trend towards lower re-operation rate following joint replacement, with the difference becoming apparent after over one year's follow-up. Conclusion Despite the quality of evidence, the default operation for failed extracapsular hip fracture fixation should be joint replacement, based on a likely lower re-operation rate and permitting immediate full-weight-bearing. In selected instances, particularly younger patients and those who can partially-weight-bear, revision fixation would still be considered. As the number of hip fractures continues to increase both within the UK and worldwide, we can expect to see more patients with previous failed fixations, and more evidence regarding the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment strategies is required.

Tranexamic Acid Administered at Time of Hospital Admission Does Not Decrease Transfusion Rates or Blood Loss for Extracapsular Hip Fractures: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

To evaluate tranexamic acid (TXA) when administered immediately on hospital presentation in patients with extracapsular peritrochanteric hip fractures to determine its effect on (1) transfusion rates, (2) estimated blood loss, and (3) complications. Prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Single-center, Level 1 trauma center. All patients with isolated OTA/AO 31-A fracture patterns from 2018 to 2022 were eligible for inclusion. Study drug was administered in the emergency department at the time of presentation-1-g bolus over 10 minutes followed by a 1-g infusion over 8 hours. The primary outcome was the rate of red blood cell transfusion hospital days 1-4. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss and complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause 90-day readmissions, and all-cause mortality. One hundred twenty-eight patients were included-64 patients were randomized to intravenous TXA and 64 patients to intravenous normal saline (ie, placebo). There was no difference in the rate of red blood cell transfusion between treatment arms between hospital days 1-4 (27% in the TXA arm vs. 31% in the placebo arm, P = 0.65). Patients randomized to placebo who required transfusion received a mean of 2.30 units compared with 1.94 units in the TXA cohort (P = 0.55). There was no difference in the estimated blood loss between hospital days 1-4. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, 90-day readmission, or death. The results of this study do not support the use of preoperative TXA for reducing blood loss for geriatric patients with extracapsular hip fractures. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

POST-COVID-19 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS COMPARING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILS AND SLIDING HIP SCREW CONSTRUCTS FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES DO NOT REPRESENT TYPICAL PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Extracapsular Hip Fractures (EHF's) are a significant health burden on healthcare services. Optimal treatment is controversial with conflicting evidence being reported. Currently treatment is undertaken with Intramedullary Nail (IMN) or Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) constructs with a recent increase in IMN use (1). This study aims to conduct a systematic review of Randomised Control Trials published between 2020 and 2023 with particular focus on patient demographics and holistic patient outcomes.Using a unified search-protocol, RCT's published between 2020 and 2023 were collected from CENTRAL, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Rayyan software screened duplicates. Using the CASP and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool papers were critically examined twice, and Blood Loss, Infection and Mobility described the patient journey. Patient demographics were recorded and were contrasted with geographically diverse cohort studies to compare population differences. Parametric tests were used to determine significance levels between population demographics, namely Age and Sex.Eleven papers were included, representing 908 patients (436 Male). The mean age for patients was 64.39. There was considerable risk of bias in 7/11 studies owing to the randomization process and the recording of data. Four Cohort studies were selected for comparison representing 14314 patients. Mean age was significantly different between Cohort Studies and RCT's (Independent T-Test, df 13, t=7.8, p = <0.001, mean difference = 19.251, 95% CI = 13.888, 24.613). This was also true for sex ratios included in the studies (df 13, t = -2.268, p = 0.024, Mean Difference = -0.4884, 95% CI = -0.9702, -0.0066).To conclude, RCT's published in the post COVID-19 era are not representative of patient demographics. This has the potential to provide inaccurate information for implant selection. Additionally further research must be conducted in how to better improve RCT patient inclusion so as to be more representative of patients whilst balancing the risks of operations.

Impact of Comorbidities as Predictors on Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) and Mortality in Hip Fracture (HF) Patients in a Rural Community

Purpose: Studies on HF at a rural health system area are rare. The research question is “Which demographic, preoperative variables would be independent predictors of outcomes on mortality and hospital LOS?”
 Methods: The design is a community-based cross-sectional study with risk factor analyses. We ascertained HF cases from hospital trauma center registry and Epic software. We employed both descriptive and analytic approaches including multivariable regression analyses of predictors on outcomes.
 Results: Of 201 HF patients, 85.6% occurred in 65 and above years (seniors). Among seniors, females consisted of 64.0% with mean age ± SD: 83.72 ± 7.56 years; extracapsular HF, 55.2%; specified falls, 51.7%; obesity, 15.2%; complication, 3.5%; surgery interventions, 80.8%; mortality within 1, 9.3%; 3, 11.6%; 6, 15.1%; and 12 months, 22.1% after hospital admission. Holding all other variables constant, no surgical intervention increased mortality risk within 1-month (OR=28.87, 95% CI: 4.43; 188.16), 3-months (OR=33.47; 95% CI: 5.24; 213.88), 6-months (OR=21.78; 95% CI: 3.67; 129.48), and 12-months (OR=4.17; 95% CI: 1.33;13.04) compared to surgical intervention; obesity increased 1-month mortality risk (OR=6.00; 95% CI: 1.06; 34.09) compared to no obesity; and patients transferred from community hospital compared to those who were not had an increased 1-month (OR= 8.54; 95% CI: 1.25; 58.13), 3-month (OR=15.31; 95% CI: 2.21; 106.16), 6-month (OR=21.19; 95% CI: 3.34; 134.43), and 12-month (OR=5.14; 95% CI: 1.85; 14.28) mortality risk. Hospital LOS was 3.06 days higher in obese patients than non-obese patients and 2.11 days higher in surgery greater than 48 hours when compared to surgery within 48 hours, holding all other variables constant.
 Conclusions and Potential Impact: We believe that surgical intervention decreases, and obesity increases HF mortality. Obesity and delayed surgical intervention increase hospital LOS. The results of this study have the potential benefit for improving community health of rural, elderly populations in northeast Indiana.

Retrospective Analysis of Extracapsular Hip Fracture Outcomes Before and During the Pandemic: A Comparative Cohort Study

Retrospective Analysis of Extracapsular Hip Fracture Outcomes Before and During the Pandemic: A Comparative Cohort Study

Rate of Complications after Hip Fractures Caused by Prolonged Time-to-Surgery Depends on the Patient's Individual Type of Fracture and Its Treatment.

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly and are usually treated with timely surgery. While severe postoperative complications are reported for up to 10% of patients, many studies identified predictive factors for the occurrence of complications postoperatively. A controversially discussed factor is "time-to-surgery". The aim of the study was to examine if time-to-surgery was associated with the occurrence of complications and if the complication rate differed between the patient individual fracture types of intracapsular on the one hand and extracapsular hip fractures on the other hand. We hypothesized that time-to-surgery had less impact on complications in intracapsular hip fractures compared to extracapsular ones, and therefore, guidelines should pay attention to the patient individual case scenario. All patients who were admitted to the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery of an academic teaching hospital for hip fracture surgery (n = 650) over a five-year period were included in the study. After the application of the exclusion criteria, such as periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, cases needed immediate surgical treatment, and after outlier adjustment, 629 cases remained in the study. Hip fractures were classified into intracapsular fractures (treated by hip arthroplasty) and extracapsular fractures (treated by intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis). The occurrence of severe complications in patients treated within 24 h was compared with patients treated later than 24 h after injury. For statistical evaluation, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of time-to-surgery interval on the occurrence of complications. Patients with an extracapsular fracture, which was treated with intramedullary nailing (44.5%), rarely suffered a serious complication when surgery was performed within 24 h after injury. However, when the interval of the time-to-surgery was longer than 24 h, the complication rate increased significantly (8.63% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.002). In contrast to this finding in patients with intracapsular fractures (55.5%), which were treated with cemented arthroplasty, complication rates did not depend on the 24 h interval (26.17% vs. 20.83%, p = 0.567). The occurrence of complications after surgical treatment of hip fractures is associated with the time interval between injury and surgery. A 24 h time interval between injury and surgical procedure seems to play a major role only in extracapsular fractures treated with osteosynthesis but not in intracapsular fractures treated with arthroplasty. Therefore, guidelines should take notice of the patient individual case scenario and, in particular, the individual hip fracture type.

Full Reversal of Anticoagulants Prior to Cephalomedullary Fixation of Geriatric Hip Fractures May Not Be Necessary.

To examine the relationship between anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs and surgical blood loss for geriatric patients undergoing cephalomedullary nail fixation of extracapsular proximal femur fractures. Multicenter retrospective cohort study using bivariate and multivariable regression analyses. Two level-1 trauma centers. 1442 geriatric (ages 60-105) patients undergoing isolated primary intramedullary fixation of non-pathologic extracapsular hip fractures from 2009 - 2018 including 657 taking an antiplatelet drug alone (including aspirin), 99 taking warfarin alone, 37 taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) alone, 59 taking an antiplatelet drug and an anticoagulant, and 590 taking neither. Cephalomedullary nail fixation. Blood transfusion and calculated blood loss. More patients taking antiplatelet drugs required a transfusion than controls (43% versus 33%, p < 0.001) whereas patients taking warfarin or DOACs did not (35% or 32% versus 33%). Median calculated blood loss was increased in patients taking antiplatelet drugs (1275 mL versus 1059 mL, p < 0.001) but not in patients taking warfarin or DOACs (913 mL or 859 mL versus 1059 mL). Antiplatelet drugs were independently associated with an odds ratio of transfusion of 1.45 (95% CI 1.1 - 1.9) in contrast with 0.76 (95% CI 0.5 - 1.2) for warfarin and 0.67 (95% CI 0.3 - 1.4) for DOACs. Geriatric patients taking warfarin (incompletely reversed) or DOACs lose less blood during cephalomedullary nail fixation of hip fractures than those taking aspirin. Delaying surgery to mitigate anticoagulant-related surgical blood loss may be unwarranted. Therapeutic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures with Cephalomedullary Nails: Single Head Screw vs. Dual Integrated Compression Screw Systems.

Extracapsular hip fractures are very common in the elderly. They are mainly treated surgically with an intramedullary nail. Nowadays, both endomedullary hip nails with single cephalic screw systems and interlocking double screw systems are available on the market. The latter are supposed to increase rotational stability and therefore decrease the risk of collapse and cut-out. A retrospective cohort study was carried out, in which 387 patients with extracapsular hip fracture undergoing internal fixation with an intramedullary nail were included to study the occurrence of complications and reoperations. Of the 387 patients, 69% received a single head screw nail and 31% received a dual integrated compression screw nail. The median follow-up was 1.1 years, and in that time, a total of 17 reoperations were performed (4.2%; 2.1% for single head screw nails vs. 8.7% for double head screws). According to the multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex and basicervical fracture, the adjusted hazard risk of reoperation required was 3.6 times greater when using double interlocking screw systems (p = 0.017). A propensity scores analysis confirmed this finding. In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using two interlocking head screw systems and the increased risk of reoperation in our single center, we encourage to other researchers to explore this question in a wider multicenter study.

Optimizing post-operative imaging: a retrospective cohort study comparing two methods of lateral hip radiography after cephalomedullary nail surgery

BackgroundCurrently, there is no consensus on the most appropriate technique for obtaining lateral hip radiographs after cephalomedullary nail (CMN) surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of two commonly used postoperative lateral hip radiographic methods (classic lateral view and modified lateral view) and try to find out which one is better suited for this situation.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 146 patients who underwent surgical fixation for extracapsular hip fractures between January 2018 and June 2022. The main outcome measured was the angle between the straight part of the CMN and the lag screw/blade on hip lateral X-rays (CMNA). The lateral hip radiographs were categorized into two groups based on different lateral hip radiographic methods. CMNA, patient age, gender, fracture classification based on the 2018 AO classification, nail length (short/long), surgical side (left/right), height, weight, BMI, preoperative waiting time, postoperative imaging interval were collected and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe distribution trend of CMNA significantly differs between two types of hip joint lateral radiographic methods. Specifically, the classic lateral method exhibits a significantly bimodal and skewed distribution with a median (p25, p75) of -21.6° (-31.2°, -8°), whereas the modified lateral method presents a normal distribution with a mean ± SD of +7.57° ± 14.4°. The difference in the Mean Rank between the classic (47.10) and the modified (102.96) lateral methods is statistically significant (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe CMNA method is an excellent tool for studying the lateral distribution.We recommend using the modified lateral view as the preferred option for obtaining lateral hip radiographs after CMN surgery due to its superior distribution of CMNA and greater patient-friendliness.

Comparison of true blood loss between short and long cephalomedullary nail fixation of geriatric hip fractures, a retrospective cohort study.

Existing literature is discrepant on the differences in blood loss and need for transfusion between short and long cephalomedullary nails used for extracapsular geriatric hip fractures. However, prior studies used the inaccurate estimated rather than the more accurate 'calculated' blood loss based on hematocrit dilution (Gibon in IO 37:735-739, 2013, Mercuriali in CMRO 13:465-478, 1996). This study sought to clarify whether use of short nails is associated with clinically meaningful reductions in calculated blood loss and resultant need for transfusion. A retrospective cohort study using bivariate and propensity score-weighted linear regression analyses was conducted examining 1442 geriatric (ages 60-105) patients undergoing cephalomedullary fixation of extracapsular hip fractures over 10years at two trauma centers. Implant dimensions, pre and postoperative laboratory values, preoperative medications, and comorbidities were recorded. Two groups were compared based on nail length (greater or less than 235mm). Short nails were associated with a 26% reduction in calculated blood loss (95% confidence interval: 17-35%; p < 10-14) and a 24-min (36%) reduction in mean operative time (95% confidence interval: 21-26min; p < 10-71). The absolute reduction in transfusion risk was 21% (95% confidence interval: 16-26%; p < 10-13) yielding a number needed to treat of 4.8 (95% confidence interval: 3.9-6.4) with short nails to prevent one transfusion. No difference in reoperation, periprosthetic fracture, or mortality was noted between groups. Use of short compared to long cephalomedullary nails for geriatric extracapsular hip fractures confers reduced blood loss, need for transfusion, and operative time without a difference in complications.

The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Blood Transfusion Rates in Extracapsular Hip Fractures: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Perioperative allogenic blood transfusions for patients with hip fractures are associated with increased costs and complications. This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluated whether tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood transfusion rates and blood loss in extracapsular hip fractures, when administered at the time of hospital admission. Patients with closed intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric femur fractures undergoing intramedullary nailing (n=100) were enrolled from October 2015 to January 2019. On arrival to the hospital, patients were randomized to receive either 1 g of intravenous TXA or normal saline. Blood transfusion rates from hospital arrival to postoperative day 5 or discharge, blood loss from hospital arrival to postoperative day 3 or 4, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and major complications were evaluated. Six patients from the TXA group and five from the placebo group were excluded because of canceled surgery, study drug infusion after incision, multiple fractures, or dropout. Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Postoperative transfusion rates were 17.5% (7 of 40) in the TXA group and 36.7% (18 of 49) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-1.03; P=.046). Total blood loss was significantly less in the TXA group (mean difference, 367 mL; 95% CI, 76-657; P=.01). No significant differences were found for intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, or 30-day major complications. TXA administered on hospital arrival decreased the risk of postoperative blood transfusion and mean perioperative blood loss in patients with extracapsular hip fractures. We recommend a single-dose intravenous administration of TXA at the time of hospital admission for patients with extracapsular hip fractures. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e303-e309.].

Comparative analysis of the effects of dalteparin and reviparin on perioperative blood loss in patients with extracapsular hip fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Aim To determine differences between reviparin and dalteparin treatment in patients with extracapsular hip fractures treated with intramedullary nailing and their effects on perioperative blood loss and early postoperative recovery. Methods Retrospective comparative study included 68 patients with extracapsular hip fracture who were divided into dalteparin and reviparin group. Medical records were used to obtain demographic data, laboratory parameters, haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, platelet count, mortality rate and medical complications. Results Out of total 68 patients, 31 were in reviparin and 37 in dalteparin group. Mean age of patients was 70.5 (±14.4) and 76.8 (±8.4) years in reviparin and dalteparin group, respectively (p=0.071). Median values of haemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day were lower in dalteparin group compared to reviparin group (p=0.012). On the first postoperative day haematocrit values were also lower in dalteparin than in reviparin group (p=0.015). Both groups showed an increase in platelet count on the first postoperative day, but without significant difference (p=0.084). There was no statistically significant difference in intrahospital mortality between the groups (6.4% vs. 2.7%; p=0.588). One case of pulmonary embolism was detected in the dalteparin group. Conclusion Low-molecular-weight heparin is the drug of choice in patients with hip fractures for thromboprophylaxis. Due to non-antithrombin-mediated actions, reviparin and dalteparin could have different effects on perioperative blood loss. Both dalteparin and reviparin are safe and effective agents for thromboprophylaxis in patients with proximal femur fractures.

Conversion arthroplasty after failed extracapsular hip fracture fixation is associated with high complication rates

Background/Aim: There is no standard treatment of choice that addresses all extracapsular fractures, which account for approximately half of the elderly hip fractures. Arthroplasty is mostly favored secondary to unsuccessful fixation or unstable primary fractures. However, conversion arthroplasty complication rates are high in the literature. This study compares arthroplasty performed after unsuccessful fixation and primary arthroplasty for unstable extracapsular hip fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we compared the first-year results of the groups that underwent conversion arthroplasty (cHA) and the primary arthroplasties (pHA) for extracapsular hip fractures. In the cHA group, patients were indicated for operation if there was a failure of fixation after extracapsular hip fractures (n=44). In the pHA group, patients were for unstable extracapsular hip fractures (n=44). In the cHA group, failure of fixation causes were cut-out of lag screws (54.5%), cut-through of lag screws (9.1%), non-union of fractures (27.3%), and osteonecrosis of femoral heads (9.1%). While total hip replacement was applied to all patients in the cHA group, total hip replacement was applied to ten patients in the pHA group and hemiarthroplasty to 34 patients. In comparing groups, duration of operation, amount of bleeding, intraoperative complications, post-operative complications, mobilization capacities, functional status, and mortality rates were used. Results: There were 44 patients in both groups. The surgical time (134.3 [34.5)] vs. 66 [16], [P&lt;0.001]), the amount of bleeding (1000 ml [400] vs. 300ml [200], [P&lt;0.001]), the need for red blood cell transfusion in the operations (80% vs. 32%, [P&lt;0.001]), and the frequency of intraoperative femur fracture (30% vs. 0%, [P&lt;0.001]) were larger or longer in the cHA group compared to pHA group (P&lt;0.001). While 14 complications requiring surgical intervention were observed in 12 of 44 patients in the CHA group in the post-operative 1st year, four complications were observed in four of 44 patients in the pHA group. There was no difference in mortality rates (3 vs. 3, [P =1]), mobilization capacities (5.9 [2.1] vs. 5.7 [2.0], [P=0.597]), and functional status (12.5 [3.3] vs. 13.0 [2.7], [P=0.434]) between the groups. Conclusion: Arthroplasty performed as conversion surgery after unsuccessful fixation has a higher risk of intraoperative and post-operative complications than primary arthroplasty performed after extracapsular hip fractures. We believe the cases prone to implant failure, non-union, or restricted mobilization because of the patient and fracture-type reasons should be treated with primary arthroplasty.

Mechanical Complications After Intramedullary Fixation of Extracapsular Hip Fractures.

Extracapsular hip fractures occur frequently in the elderly as a result of low-energy trauma. Achieving stable fixation in osteoporotic bone to allow early weight bearing is a key objective in the treatment of these injuries. Many of the intraoperative decisions facing surgeons are directed by first determining fracture stability. Unstable fracture patterns should be fixated with intramedullary nails, aiming to control motion around the implant and at the fracture site. Torsion control devices provide additional stability and control, although their exact indications are not precisely defined. Complications that arise as a result of the early loading can be avoided with a good surgical reduction, meticulous technique, and proper implant selection. Mechanical complications include cutout, inordinate proximal femoral shortening, delayed union, early implant fracture, nail toggle, and cut through/medial migration.

New Prognostic Factors in Operated Extracapsular Hip Fractures: Infection and GammaTScore.

There is no universal postoperative classification of extracapsular hip fractures (ECFs). We wondered if infection (according to infection after fracture fixation criteria (IAFF)), immediate partial weight bearing (PWB) and/or the new GammaTScore tool could predict early cut-out. We also examined the correlation between GammaTScore and time to consolidation and studied long-term survival. This was a retrospective cohort study of low-energy complete ECFs operated with Gamma3T nailing in 2014 and fully monitoring, in patients aged over 65. Ten not distally locked cases, one late cut-out, one cut-through, one osteonecrosis and one pseudarthrosis were discarded. Patients were classified into early cut-out (7/204; 3.55%) and no early cut-out (197/204; 96.45%). There was a lower percentage of A2 fractures according to the AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification (AO/OTA, 1997) in early cut-out. IAFF and only the GammaTScore reduction parameter were different for early cut-out, in opposition to immediate PWB, tip-to-apex distance (TAD) or the Baumgaertner–Fogagnolo classification. GammaTScore inversely correlated with consolidation (p < 0.01). Long-term survival time was not statistically significantly lower in the early cut-out group. Small sample of cases may limit our results. Apart from an important role of IAFF, GammaTScore would be useful for predicting consolidation, avoiding complications and reducing costs. Further studies are needed for reliability.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty following extracapsular hip fracture fixation with a cephalomedullary device: a comprehensive review.

With the annual incidence of hip fractures and hip fracture fixation rising, the need for conversion total hip arthroplasty has also risen. About half of the 280,000 hip fractures that occur annually in the United States are extracapsular. Commonly extracapsular hip fractures are treated with either cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) or sliding hip screws (SHS). More recently, there has been a shift toward increased CMN use due to increased training with this fixation method as well as perioperative and biomechanical benefits. Given this shift, orthopedic surgeons need to understand the factors that lead to CMN failure. Failed CMN treatment leaves both patients and surgeons with few management options including revision fixation with or without osteotomy, conversion total hip arthroplasty, and conversion hemiarthroplasty. Surgeons must consider the patient and injury characteristics before deciding the best treatment plan. Conversion total hip arthroplasty is indicated in younger patients without femoral head and/or acetabular articular injury, degenerative joint disease, or avascular necrosis. Conversion total arthroplasty is a technically demanding and resource-intensive surgery associated with lower success rates and outcomes than primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic surgeons should have thorough understanding of preoperative workup needed prior to surgery, implant selection associated with best outcomes, most common surgical approaches used, intraoperative considerations, and complications associated with conversion total hip arthroplasty. A comprehensive understanding of these concepts gives patients the best chance of having a successful outcome.

Hip Fracture in the Elderly: An Overview

In this paper, the available information about hıp fracture ın the elderly is briefly reviewed. Intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures, which usually occur due to low energy trauma in elderly patients, are one of the most important causes of functional disability, morbidity and mortality. Treatment of hip fractures; it requires the management of a broad spectrum from prevention to surgery and post-operative care. It is important to mobilize elderly patients with hip fractures as soon as possible by treating them with the appropriate method and to avoid systemic complications that may occur due to immobility.

No Difference in Conversion Rate to Hip Arthroplasty After Intramedullary Nail or Sliding Hip Screw for Extracapsular Hip Fractures: An Observational Cohort Study of 19,604 Individuals.

The widespread use of intramedullary nails (IMNs) compared with sliding hip screws (SHSs) in extracapsular hip fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1, 31-A2, 31-A3) has been questioned because of a higher complication rate, although the outcome might have improved through more recent implant designs and the learning curve. This study aimed to investigate if there is a difference with regard to the cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty or any reoperation during the first 5 years after IMN or SHS fixation of extracapsular hip fractures. In this nationwide, observational cohort study, individuals who were ≥60 years of age and were registered in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) from 2012 to 2018 due to extracapsular fracture and were primarily treated with an IMN or SHS were followed in the SFR and the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR) for a minimum of 1 year. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of conversion to arthroplasty (conversion rate). The secondary outcome was the cumulative incidence of all reoperations (reoperation rate). Both were calculated in a competing risk analysis during the first 5 years. We included 19,604 individuals (70% women), with a median age of 85 years (range, 60 to 107 years). The 31-A2 fracture was most prevalent (52%), followed by the 31-A1 fracture (28%). No significant differences were seen in the 1-year conversion rate after IMN or SHS use (1.0% compared with 0.9% in the 31-A1 fractures, 1.7% compared with 1.3% in the 31-A2 fractures, and 1.3% compared with 1.5% in the 31-A3 fractures) or in the 1-year reoperation rate (1.9% compared with 1.9% in the type-A1 fractures, 3.4% compared with 2.5% in the type-A2 fractures, and 4.0% compared with 5.2% in the type-A3 fractures). Only in 31-A2 fractures were more reoperations seen after IMN use at 2 and 5 years (p < 0.05). The crude 1-year-mortality was 26.4% (5,178 of 19,604), without significant differences between implants. Considering conversion arthroplasty, IMNs and SHSs performed equally well in general. IMN use was associated with more reoperations than SHS use in 31-A2 fractures at 2 years. However, from a clinical perspective, the differences between the implants were small, in particular when considering the competing risk of dying. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous reduction with double screwdrivers versus limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible extracapsular hip fractures.

BackgroundThe reduction in irreducible extracapsular hip fractures has always been controversial. Here, we present a new minimally invasive reduction technique and compare it with limited open reduction (LOR) to treat irreducible extracapsular hip fractures.MethodsFrom January 2016 to January 2018, our institution treated 653 patients with extracapsular hip fractures by intramedullary fixation. Among them, 525 cases got a successful closed reduction. The other 128 were irreducible and reduced by percutaneous reduction with double screwdrivers (PRDS) or LOR. There were 66 cases in the PRDS group while 62 in the LOR group. All fractures were classified using the Evans-Jensen classification. In addition, the differences in incision length, blood loss, fluoroscopic number, operation time, inpatient time, weight training time, Harris score, and complications were analyzed.ResultsThe incision length was 8.4 ± 1.4 cm in the PRDS group and 15.3 ± 3.0 cm in the LOR group, respectively (p < 0.05); blood loss was equal to 151 ± 26 and 319 ± 33 ml, respectively (p < 0.05); fluoroscopic number was 14 ± 3 and 8 ± 2, respectively (p < 0.05); operation time was 44 ± 9 and 73 ± 11 min, respectively (p < 0.05); inpatient time was 6.2 ± 1.7 and 8.4 ± 2.2 days, respectively (p < 0.05); weight training time after the operation was 4.5 ± 1.5 and 10.7 ± 1.8 days, respectively (p < 0.05); and the excellent rate of Harris score was 92.4% and 88.7%, respectively (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in complication incidence between the two groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe PRDS group presented better clinical effects for managing irreducible extracapsular hip fractures than the LOR. Therefore, the PRDS technique could be the first reduction choice for patients with irreducible fractures.

Impact of subtrochanteric fractures in the geriatric population: better pre-fracture condition but poorer outcome than pertrochanteric fractures: evidence from the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry

BackgroundClinical management in orthogeriatric units and outcome indicators are similar for extracapsular fragility hip fractures, without discriminating between subtrochanteric and pertrochanteric fractures.HypothesisGeriatric patients, 75 years or older, with subtrochanteric fractures have worse clinical and functional outcomes than those with pertrochanteric fractures.Materials and methodsRetrospective observational study of data prospectively collected by the Spanish Hip Fracture Registry including patients 75 years or older, admitted for extracapsular hip fractures from January 2017 to June 2019. Demographic and baseline status, pre-operative, post-operative and 30-day follow-up data were included.ResultsA total of 13,939 patients with extracapsular hip fractures were registered: 12,199 (87.5%) pertrochanteric and 1740 (12.5%) subtrochanteric. At admission, patients with subtrochanteric fractures were younger (86.5 ± 5.8 versus 87.1 ± 5.6 years old), had better pre-fracture mobility (3.7 ± 2.7 versus 3.9 ± 2.8) (1-to-10 scale, 1 being independent) and were more likely to be living at home; those with pertrochanteric fractures had worse cognitive function (Pfeiffer 3.3 ± 3.3 versus 3.8 ± 3.5). The subtrochanteric fracture group showed worse post-fracture mobility (7.3 ± 2.7 versus 6.7 ± 2.7) and greater deterioration of mobility (3.7 ± 3.0 versus 2.9 ± 2.7). Among individuals living at home at baseline, those with subtrochanteric fractures were more likely to remain in an assisted facility at 30-day follow-up. In-hospital mortality during acute admission was higher for the subtrochanteric group (5.6% versus 4.5%) (p = 0.028). To our knowledge, this is the first paper highlighting the differences between these two fracture groups in the geriatric population.ConclusionsSubtrochanteric fractures in the older population are a different and worse entity, with greater morbimortality and functional decline than pertrochanteric fractures. Despite being younger and fitter at admission, older patients with subtrochanteric fractures have a higher risk of remaining non-weight bearing and undergoing re-operation and institutionalization. Orthogeriatric units should be aware of this and manage subtrochanteric fractures accordingly.Level of evidence: IV.