Extra-anatomic Revascularization Research Articles

Current Transthoracic Supra-Aortic Trunk Surgical Reconstruction Has Similar 30-Day Cardiovascular Outcomes Compared to Extra-Anatomic Revascularization but With Higher Morbidity Burden

Operative risk for supra-aortic trunk (SAT) surgical revascularization for occlusive disease, particularly transthoracic reconstruction (TR), remains ill-defined. This study sought to describe and compare 30-day outcomes of TR and extra-anatomic (ER) SAT surgical reconstruction for an occlusive indication across the United States over a contemporary 15-year period. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, TR and ER performed during 2005-2019 were identified. Procedures performed for nonocclusive indications and those concomitant with coronary or valve operations were excluded. Rates of stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI) and these as composite outcome (S/D/M) were compared. Logistic regression with stabilized inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to compare groups via average treatment effect (ATE) while adjusting for covariate imbalances. Over the 15-year period, 166TR and 1,900 ER patients were identified. The majority of ERs were carotid-subclavian bypass (n=1,344; 70.7%) followed by carotid-carotid bypass (n=261; 13.7%) and subclavian/carotid transpositions (n=123; 6.5%). TR consisted of aorto-SAT bypass (n=120; 72.3%) and endarterectomy (n=46; 27.7%). The median age was 64years for TR and 65years in ER (P=0.039). Those undergoing TR were more often women (69.0% vs. 56.9%; P=0.001) and less likely to have undergone previous cardiac surgery (9.2% vs. 20.8%; P=0.006). TR were also less frequently hypertensive (68.1% vs. 75.4%; P=0.038) and had statistically lower preoperative creatinine levels (0.86 vs 0.91; P=0.002). Unadjusted rates of MI (0.6% vs. 1.3%; P=0.72) and stroke (3.6% vs. 1.9%; P=0.15) were similar between groups with mortality (3.6% vs. 1.5%; P=0.05) and S/D/M (6.6% vs. 3.9%; P=0.10) trending higher with TR. IPWs could be calculated for 1,754 patients (148TR; 1,606 ER). The estimated probability of S/D/M was 3.8% in the ER group and 6.2% in TR; no difference was seen in ATE (2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.5 to 6.2; P=0.23). No differences were seen in individual component ATEs (stroke: 3.0% vs. 1.7%; ATE=1.3%; 95% CI: -3.9 to 1.3; P=0.32; mortality: 3.8% vs. 1.4%; ATE=2.4%; 95% CI: -5.6 to 0.7; P=0.13). Secondary outcomes showed TR patients were more likely to have non-home discharge (18.7% vs. 6.6%; ATE=12.1%; 95% CI: 5.0-19.2; P<0.001) and longer lengths of stay (6.1 vs. 4.0; ATE=2.2days; 95% CI: 0.9-3.4; P<0.001). Moreover, TR patients were more likely to require transfusion (22.7% vs. 5.0%; ATE=17.7%; 95% CI: 10.2-25.2; P<0.001) and develop sepsis (2.7% vs. 0.2%; ATE=2.5%; 95% CI: 0.1-5.0; P=0.04). Transthoracic and extra-anatomic surgical reconstruction of the SATs for occlusive disease have similar operative cardiovascular risk. However, morbidity tends to be higher with TR due to higher transfusion requirements, sepsis risk, and need for facility stay. These results suggest ER as a first-line approach in those with proper disease anatomy is reasonable with lower morbidity, while TR remains justified in appropriate patients.

Surgical Outcomes of Infective Native Aortoiliac Aneurysms in a Chilean Academic Center

Infective native aortic aneurysms (INAAs), formerly called mycotic aneurysms, remain an uncommon disease with significant heterogeneity among cases; hence, there is lack of solid evidence to opt for the best treatment strategy. The present study aims to describe a 20-year experience at a single institution treating this uncommon condition. Retrospective study of all patients treated for INAA at a single academic hospital in Santiago, Chile, between 2002 and 2022. Clinical characteristics are described, as well as operative outcomes per type of treatment. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed when appropriate, and results were reported as median and ranges. Survival at given timeframes was determined by a Kaplan-Meier curve, with analysis performed through a Cox regression model. During the study period, 1,798 patients underwent aortic procedures at our center, of which 35 (1.9%) were treated for INAA. Of them, 25 (71.4%) were male. One patient had 2 INAAs. Median age was 69.5years (range: 34-89years). Of the 36 INAAs, the most frequent location was the abdominal and thoracic aorta in 20 (55.5%) and 11 (30.5%) cases, respectively, followed by the iliac arteries in 4 (11.1%) cases. One (2.7%) patient presented a thoracoabdominal INAA. Overall, endovascular treatment associated with long-term antibiotics was used in 20 (57.1%) patients: 4 of them underwent hybrid treatment. Fifteen (42.8%) patients underwent direct aortic debridement followed by in situ or extra anatomic revascularization. There was a significant difference in age between both treatment strategies (a median of 76.5years for endovascular versus a median of 57years for open, P=0.011). The median hospital stay was 15days (range: 2-70days). The early complications rate (<30 postoperative days) was 20% (n=7). Early mortality rate (inhospital or before postoperative 30days) was 14.2% (n=5). Median follow-up was 33months (range: 6-216months). The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 69.9% (standard error [SE] 8.0), 61.7% (SE 9.8), and 50.9% (SE 11.8), respectively. Five-year survival rate of patients undergoing endovascular treatment compared with open approach was 45.9% (SE 15.1) versus 80.0% (SE 17.8), respectively (P=0.431). There were no significant differences in survival between open and endovascular treatment, hazard ratio 3.58 (confidence interval 95%: 0.185-1.968, SE±0.45 P=0.454). Patients treated by endovascular approach were older than patients treated by open approach. Even though, the open group had a higher 5-year survival rate than the endovascular group, not statically significance differences were found between treatments.

Management of the left subclavian artery during aortic arch replacement using a frozen elephant trunk approach: a review.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for total aortic arch replacement extends repair into the proximal portion of the descending thoracic aorta. Several techniques and modifications of total arch replacement have been described in the literature, and many of these iterations are related to facilitating the distal anastomosis while preserving flow to the left subclavian artery (LSCA), as well as maintaining posterior circulation of the brain via the vertebral artery, by reducing the circulatory arrest time during reconstruction. Because of the LSCA's posterior and deep anatomic location in the chest, particularly in obese patients, this revascularization is often challenging; additional concerns regarding LSCA revascularization include patients with large aortic arch aneurysms, those with dissected or calcified arteries, and reoperation. A careful plan for reconstruction is necessary. Whether revascularization is performed preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperatively, every effort should be made to include the left subclavian artery as part of the operational approach. Revascularization techniques include reimplantation as part of the island patch or direct anastomosis, stenting, bypass, transposition or a hybrid approach. The importance of maintaining circulation of the LSCA cannot be overstated. Preserving flow to the spinal cord via collaterals minimizes the risk of cord injury during FET procedure. In patients with a patent left internal mammary artery bypass, left arm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis, dominant circulation, or direct aortic origin of the left vertebral artery, revascularization is necessary as well. In the case of initial sacrifice, arm claudication or steal syndrome usually dictates delayed extra-anatomic revascularization in the postoperative period.

Extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy for preoperative cerebral malperfusion due to severe stenosis or occlusion of supra-aortic branch vessels in acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectivesAcute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with severe stenosis or occlusion of the true lumen of aortic arch branch vessels often leads to an increased incidence of severe postsurgical neurological complications and mortality rate. In this study, we aimed to introduce our institutional extra-anatomic revascularization and cannulation strategy with improved postoperative outcomes for better management of patients with cerebral malperfusion in the setting of ATAAD. MethodsTwenty-eight patients with ATAAD complicated by severe stenosis or occlusion of the aortic arch branch vessels, as noted on combined computed tomography angiography of the aorta and craniocervical artery, between January 2021 and June 2022 were included in this study. Basic patient characteristics, surgical procedures, hospitalization stays, and early follow-up results were analyzed. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (interquartile range: 11.5–20.5), with a 100% completion rate. The 30-day mortality rates was 7.1% (2/28 patients); two patients had multiple cerebral infarctions on preoperative computed tomography and persistent coma. Postoperative transient neurological dysfunction occurred in 10.7% (3/28) of the patients, and no new permanent neurological dysfunction occurred. Of all the patients, 3.6% (1/28) had novel acute renal failure. No other deaths, secondary surgeries, or serious complications occurred during the early follow-up period. ConclusionsUse of extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy before cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and feasible and may reduce the high incidence of postoperative neurological complications in patients with ATAAD and cerebral malperfusion.

A Novel Bypass Technique to Prevent Vexing Spinal Cord Ischemia in Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Intervention.

Spinal cord ischemia remains a devastating complication when treating patients with complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. This approach is progressively deployed. However, to date, no strategy has been identified to reduce the feared risk of spinal cord ischemia. To introduce a novel bypass technique using a customized composite graft to create a direct extra-anatomic revascularization before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in patients with high-risk of spinal cord ischemia. To demonstrate this novel concept, we present here a clinical case that reports the strategy of this novel concept in detail. An 83-year-old man with medical history of endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracic aorta presented with a type IA endoleak, located along the posterior superior aspect of the aortic stent graft adjacent to the lumbar arteries. A multidisciplinary plan was developed, which included a novel bypass from the profunda femoris to the left L1 radicular artery before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair to prevent spinal cord ischemia. The patient successfully receives the novel extra-anatomic revascularization bypass before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. During the first implementation of this strategy, no intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications were observed. This case demonstrates a novel surgical technique before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for prevention of spinal cord ischemia. In addition, this concept provides a promising direction to not only complement the existing surgical techniques but also to generate more future innovations.

Extra-anatomic temporary intravascular shunting to assist with replantation of an amputated hand with prolonged ischemic time.

Although temporary intravascular shunting has been reported to assist with hand revascularization and replantation after traumatic amputation, most reports have described using ipsilateral upper limb inflow. We present a case of a traumatic hand amputation in a patient who had presented with 4 to 5 hours of warm ischemic time. Because the replantation team believed that extra-anatomic revascularization would be necessary, we performed a novel type of temporary intravascular shunting by connecting two arterial sheaths placed in the ulnar and superficial femoral arteries. This permitted the hand to be successfully replanted away from the inflow source and resulted in a good long-term functional outcome.

Vascular Graft Infections: An Overview of Novel Treatments Using Nanoparticles and Nanofibers

Vascular disease in elderly patients is a growing health concern, with an estimated prevalence of 15–20% in patients above 70 years old. Current treatment for vascular diseases requires the use of a vascular graft (VG) to revascularize lower or upper extremities, create dialysis access, treat aortic aneurysms, and repair dissection. However, postoperative infection is a major complication associated with the use of these VG, often necessitating several operations to achieve complete or partial graft excision, vascular coverage, and extra-anatomical revascularization. There is also a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and limb loss. Therefore, it is important to develop a method to prevent or reduce the incidence of these infections. Numerous studies have investigated the efficacy of antibiotic- and antiseptic-impregnated grafts. In comparison to these traditional methods of creating antimicrobial grafts, nanotechnology enables researchers to design more efficient VG. Nanofibers and nanoparticles have a greater surface area compared to bulk materials, allowing for more efficient encapsulation of antibiotics and better control over their temporo-spatial release. The disruptive potential of nanofibers and nanoparticles is exceptional, and they could pave the way for a new generation of prosthetic VG. This review aims to discuss how nanotechnology is shaping the future of cardiovascular-related infection management.

A catastrophic seronegative anti-phospholipid syndrome: case and literature review

BackgroundAntiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial and venous thrombosis and / or obstetric morbidity in the presence of at least one circulating anti-phospholipid antibody. The spectrum of vascular events varies from deep venous thrombosis to catastrophic APS, a rare form characterized by acute multiorgan thrombosis and high mortality.Case reportWe present the case of a 32-week pregnant woman arriving in the hospital emergency room with bilateral acute lower limb ischemia. In the obstetric evaluation, fetal death was declared. Computerized Tomography angiography showed pulmonary embolism of both pulmonary arteries, areas of splenic and right renal infarction and multiple arterial and venous thrombosis. The patient underwent urgent caesarean section and axillary-bifemoral bypass. No events registered. In the postoperative period, in an intensive care unit, treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis were added to anticoagulant therapy. The laboratorial investigation was negative for thrombophilia and autoimmune diseases.ConclusionCatastrophic APS develops quickly, with multiorgan involvement and high mortality rate. The presented case poses a multidisciplinary challenge, with the surgical approach of extra-anatomical revascularization being less invasive and guaranteeing immediate perfusion of the lower limbs. Although the serological tests were negative for anti-phospholipid antibodies, this case hardly fits into another diagnosis. Therefore, it was treated as a catastrophic APS, having shown a favorable evolution.

Dependent functional status rather than age is a better predictor of adverse outcomes after excision of an infected abdominal aortic graft

ObjectiveThe optimal management of infected abdominal aortic grafts is complete surgical excision plus in situ or extra-anatomic revascularization in patients who can tolerate this morbid operation. In addition to using age and the presence of comorbidities for risk assessment, physicians form a global clinical impression when deciding whether to offer excision or to manage conservatively. Functional status is a distinct objective measure that can inform this decision. This study examines the relative impact of age and functional status on outcomes of infected abdominal aortic graft excision to guide surgical decision-making. MethodsCurrent Procedural Terminology code 35907 was used to identify patients undergoing excision of infected abdominal aortic graft in the 2005 to 2017 American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by the upper age quartile (75 years old) as a cutoff, and then by functional status, independent vs dependent (as defined by NSIQIP). The patients were then stratified into four groups: Younger (<75)/Independent, Younger (<75)/Dependent, Older (≥75)/Independent, and Older (≥75)/Dependent. Outcomes measured included 30-day mortality and major organ-system dysfunction. ResultsThere were 814 patients who underwent infected abdominal aortic graft excision: 508 patients (62%) were Younger/Independent, 89 patients (11%) were Younger/Dependent, 176 patients (22%) were Older/Independent, and 41 patients (5%) were Older/Dependent. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality for Younger/Dependent (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-3.09; P = .536) or Older/Independent (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.19; P = .311) patients when compared with Younger/Independent patients, which suggests that neither old age nor dependent functional status by itself adversely affects mortality. However, when both factors were present, Older/Dependent patients had three times higher mortality when compared with Younger/Independent patients (41.5% vs 13.4%, respectively; OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.46-6.71; P = .003). Furthermore, as long as patients presented with independent functional status, old age by itself did not adversely affect major organ-system dysfunction (ORs for Older/Independent vs Younger/Independent were 0.76 [P = .454], 1.04 [P = .874], and 0.90 [P = .692] for cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications, respectively). On the contrary, even in younger patients, dependent functional status was significantly associated with higher pulmonary complications (Younger/Dependent vs Younger/Independent: OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.33-3.73; P = .002) and higher rates of unplanned reoperation (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.62-4.41; P < .0001). ConclusionsDependent functional status has significant association with adverse outcomes after excision of infected abdominal aortic grafts, whereas old age alone does not. Therefore, this procedure could be considered in appropriately selected elderly patients with otherwise good functional status. However, caution should be applied in dependent patients regardless of age due to the risk of pulmonary complications.

Total autogenous revascularization of an innominate artery occlusive disease

Total autogenous revascularization of an innominate artery occlusive disease

Management strategy for lower extremity malperfusion due to acute aortic dissection

ObjectiveAortic dissection can result in devastating cerebral, visceral, renal, spinal, and extremity ischemia. We describe the management and outcomes of patients presenting with aortic dissection and lower extremity malperfusion (LEM). MethodsA single-center institutional aortic database was queried for patients with aortic dissection and LEM from 2011 to 2019. The primary end point was resolution of LEM after aortic repair. Secondary end points were amputation, in-hospital mortality, time to intervention, and postoperative complications. ResultsOf 769 patients with aortic dissection, 42 (5.5%) presented acutely with LEM: 16 with Stanford type A and 26 Stanford type B aortic dissection (age 55 ± 13 years; 90% men). Most presented as Rutherford IIB symptoms, but patients with type A had Rutherford III more often, compared with those with type B. Aortic repair was performed before limb interventions in 36 patients (86%; 19 TEVAR, 16 open arch and ascending repair, and 1 open descending aortic repair with fenestration). Seven (19%) had immediate failure with persistent malperfusion recognized in the operating room and underwent additional limb intervention, including extra-anatomic revascularization (n = 4), iliac stenting (n = 2), and femoral patch with septal fenestration or tacking (n = 2). Three patients (8%) had early delayed failure requiring extra-anatomic bypass in two and amputation in one. In contrast, six patients had limb-first intervention with extra-anatomic revascularization. None had immediate failure, but one-half had early delayed failure requiring proximal aortic intervention: two TEVAR and one open aortic fenestration. Limb-first patients were more likely to have early delayed failure compared with aortic dissection treated first patients (50% vs 8%; P = .029). The amputation rate was 2%, occurring in one type A patient. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7% (n = 3), with no difference between type A and type B aortic dissection. There was no difference in surgical site infection, postoperative dialysis need, stroke, and myocardial infarction. ConclusionsIn patients presenting with acute aortic dissection with limb ischemia, resolution of the malperfusion occurs in the majority of cases after primary aortic dissection intervention, emphasizing the usefulness of urgent TEVAR for complicated type B and open repair of type A before lower extremity intervention. Limb-first interventions have a higher early delayed failure rate and thus require more frequent reoperation. However, the overall amputation rate in LEM owing to aortic dissection remains low.

Aortic graft infection: outcomes of graft excision and extra anatomic revascularization

Aortic graft infection: outcomes of graft excision and extra anatomic revascularization

Strategies to improve outcomes for acute type A aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion.

We aimed to identify predictors of postoperative permanent neurological deficits (PNDs) and evaluate the early management of cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion. Between October 2009 and September 2018, a total of 197 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent aortic replacement. Of these, 42 (21.3%) patients had an imaging cerebral malperfusion (ICM). ICM was assessed preoperatively, which also revealed whether dissected supra-aortic branch vessels were occluded or narrowed by a thrombosed false lumen. After September 2017, early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization were performed in cases with ICM. Hospital mortality rates for cases with ICM were 4.8% (2/42). Before September 2017, PND were observed in 6 patients (54.5%) with preoperative neurological symptoms (n = 11), and 7 patients (33.3%) without neurological symptoms (n = 21) in patients with ICM. Occlusion or severe stenosis of supra-aortic branch vessels (odds ratio, 7.66; P < 0.001), regardless of preoperative clinical neurological symptoms, was a risk factor for PND. After September 2017, 7 of 10 patients with ICM underwent early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization. PND did not occur in any of these 7 patients. Occlusion or severe stenosis of supra-aortic branch vessels is a predictor of PND risk in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization may reduce the risk of neurological complications in patients with ICM, with or without neurological symptoms.

Management Strategy for Lower Extremity Malperfusion Due to Acute Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVE Aortic dissection can result in devastating cerebral, visceral, renal, spinal, and extremity ischemia. We describe the management and outcomes of patients presenting with aortic dissection and lower extremity malperfusion (LEM). METHODS A single-center institutional aortic database was queried for patients with aortic dissection and LEM from 2011 to 2019. The primary end point was resolution of LEM after aortic repair. Secondary end points were amputation, in-hospital mortality, time to intervention, and postoperative complications. RESULTS Of 769 patients with aortic dissection, 42 (5.5%) presented acutely with LEM: 16 with Stanford type A and 26 Stanford type B aortic dissection (age 55 ± 13 years; 90% men). Most presented as Rutherford IIB symptoms, but patients with type A had Rutherford III more often, compared with those with type B. Aortic repair was performed before limb interventions in 36 patients (86%; 19 TEVAR, 16 open arch and ascending repair, and 1 open descending aortic repair with fenestration). Seven (19%) had immediate failure with persistent malperfusion recognized in the operating room and underwent additional limb intervention, including extra-anatomic revascularization (n = 4), iliac stenting (n = 2), and femoral patch with septal fenestration or tacking (n = 2). Three patients (8%) had early delayed failure requiring extra-anatomic bypass in two and amputation in one. In contrast, six patients had limb-first intervention with extra-anatomic revascularization. None had immediate failure, but one-half had early delayed failure requiring proximal aortic intervention: two TEVAR and one open aortic fenestration. Limb-first patients were more likely to have early delayed failure compared with aortic dissection treated first patients (50% vs 8%; P = .029). The amputation rate was 2%, occurring in one type A patient. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7% (n = 3), with no difference between type A and type B aortic dissection. There was no difference in surgical site infection, postoperative dialysis need, stroke, and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS In patients presenting with acute aortic dissection with limb ischemia, resolution of the malperfusion occurs in the majority of cases after primary aortic dissection intervention, emphasizing the usefulness of urgent TEVAR for complicated type B and open repair of type A before lower extremity intervention. Limb-first interventions have a higher early delayed failure rate and thus require more frequent reoperation. However, the overall amputation rate in LEM owing to aortic dissection remains low.

Contemporary management and outcomes of complex vascular surgical groin wound infections

ObjectiveVascular surgical groin wound infection (VS-GWI) has multiple causes and frequently is manifested as a limb- or life-threatening problem, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. For patients undergoing operative extirpation, in situ repair, extra-anatomic bypass, or ligation can be used; however, limited data exist describing comparative results of the different operative choices or conduit subtypes. Therefore, we sought to describe our experience with management of VS-GWI and to detail outcomes of the different strategies. MethodsPatients (2003-2017) undergoing surgical treatment of VS-GWI (Szilagyi grade III) secondary to primary infectious arteritis or infected pseudoaneurysm after percutaneous intervention as well as previous prosthetic graft placement were reviewed. The primary end point was major adverse limb events (MALEs; major amputation, graft occlusion, or unplanned reintervention). Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, wound healing, amputation-free survival (AFS), and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine relative risk of end points; Kaplan-Meier methodology was employed to estimate freedom from outcomes. ResultsThere were 149 patients (age, 65 ± 11 years; body mass index, 27 ± 6 kg/m2; 70% male; 32% diabetes) identified, of whom 120 (81%) had unilateral and 29 (19%) had bilateral VS-GWI. Indications included infected prosthetic bypass (88% [n = 131]; infrainguinal, 107; suprainguinal, 24) and primary infectious femoral artery complications (12% [n = 18]). A majority underwent single-stage operations (87% [n = 129]). In situ reconstruction occurred in 87% (n = 129); 9% (n = 13) underwent ligation, and 6% (n = 7) received extra-anatomic revascularization. Autogenous conduit was used most commonly (68% [n = 101/149]; 88% single stage), of which 81% (n = 80) were femoral vein. The remaining patients received cadaveric (15% [n = 23]; 87% single stage) or prosthetic (8% [n=12]; 67% single stage) grafts. Adjunctive myocutaneous flap was used in 37% (n = 54). Length of stay was 19 ± 15 days and 30-day mortality was 7% (n = 10), with no difference between conduit repair types. All femoral wounds healed (mean follow-up, 17 ± 11 months); however, 33% (n = 49) underwent reoperation (unplanned graft reintervention, 33%; graft occlusion, 16%; wound débridement, 15%; major amputation, 11%). Reinfection occurred in 17% (n = 27), with no difference between groups. MALE rate was 22% (n = 33; most were arterial reinterventions, 19%), with no difference in single-stage vs multistage, in situ vs extra-anatomic, or autogenous vs nonautogenous conduit strategies Predictors of MALE included younger age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.5; P = .02) and lower body mass index (<25 kg/m2; HR, 1.6 per BMI category; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .02). Overall, 1- and 3-year freedom from MALE, AFS, and survival were as follows: MALE, 74% ± 5% and 63% ± 6%; AFS, 68% ± 4% and 58% ± 5%; survival, 78% ± 3% and 70% ± 4%. Autogenous conduit use was associated with better survival (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; 1-year: 83% ± 4% vs nonautogenous, 78% ± 4%; 3-year: 68% ± 8% vs 53% ± 9%; log-rank, P = .006). ConclusionsAn individualized approach to operative strategy and conduit choice leads to comparable outcomes in this challenging group of patients. VS-GWI can be safely managed with in situ, autogenous reconstruction in a majority of patients with acceptable mortality, excellent wound healing rates, and improved overall survival. However, a significant proportion of patients experience reinfection and MALEs, the preponderance of which are arterial reintervention, mandating need for close follow-up and graft surveillance.

Management of mycotic aorto-iliac aneurysms: a 30-year monocentric experience.

This study aims to analyze the early and late outcomes of our 30-year experience with mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. This retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of all the patients with mycotic aneurysm, by analyzing prospectively collected data between September 1989 and October 2019 from the Unit of Vascular Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli - IRCCS in Rome, Italy. Twenty-three patients with mycotic aneurysm were included. Twenty-two patients underwent surgery; one patient arrived at the emergency room with unstable clinical conditions and died before being treated. Fourteen cases (60.9%) were located at the infrarenal aorta, while three cases (13.0%) were pararenal aortic aneurysms. Six cases (26.1%) had an iliac arteries localization. Seventeen patients (77.3%) underwent open surgical repair aneurysmectomy with in situ reconstruction, while three cases (13.6%) underwent extra-anatomic revascularization. Three patients (13.6%) underwent the placement of an endoprosthesis, of whom two underwent hybrid procedures, and one EVAR. The latter underwent an early conversion to open repair due to a type I endoleak. The mean length of hospital stay was 35 ± 18.7 days. Five patients (22.7%) died in the immediate postoperative period. In the follow-up of 45.5 ± 41.3 months (range 2-156), we documented six deaths (35.3%), of whom two (11.8%) were aortic-related for a 34.8% overall aortic-related mortality. Eleven patients were alive, with an overall survival of 47.8%. Mycotic aneurysm is an extremely rare and varied pathology. Open surgical repair showed to be a safe approach because of a complete and aggressive debridement of local infected tissues, with an acceptable long-term mortality rate.

Simultaneous coronary bypass and extra-anatomical bypass from the ascending aorta to the deep femoral arteries in a high-risk patient with aortoiliac occlusive disease: A case report

Aortobifemoral bypass surgery is the ‘Gold standard’ of therapy in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, multifocal atherosclerosis, especially in combination with multivessel coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome in high-risk patients, continues to prove challenging for surgeons. Extra-anatomical methods or revascularization can be useful in these patients. As published reports of such cases are few, our case report would be of significant interest.We describe the clinical case of 59-year old patient with aortoiliac occlusive disease, ischaemic heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, postinfarction cardiosclerosis and severe heart failure. The patient successfully underwent simultaneous coronary bypass and extra-anatomical bypass from the ascending aorta to the deep femoral arteries under parallel cardiopulmonary bypass. We describe a method that enables simultaneous revascularization of the myocardium and lower extremities in high-risk patients while avoiding the abdominal part of the procedure. Such an extra-anatomical bypass from the ascending aorta to the femoral arteries may be an alternative to the conventional combination of aortocoronary and aortobifemoral bypass in such high-risk patients.Received 5 May 2019. Revised 3 September 2019. Accepted 4 September 2019.Funding: The study did not have sponsorship.Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Comparison of the conventional frozen elephant trunk implantation technique with a modified implantation technique in zone 1.

The aim of the study was to compare the conventional frozen elephant trunk implantation technique with a modified implantation technique with an aortic anastomosis in zone 1 and extra-anatomic revascularization of the left subclavian artery during reperfusion. Between May 2014 and March 2018, 40 patients (26 male; mean age 60.2 ± 11.2 years) underwent complete aortic arch replacement with the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis™ (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland) at our institution. Seventeen patients underwent conventional arch replacement (group 1) and 23 patients the modified procedure (group 2). Indication for arch replacement included all types of acute and chronic diseases. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (213.1 ± 53.5 vs 243.8 ± 67.0 min, P = 0.13) and aortic cross-clamp time (114.4 ± 40.7 vs 117.3 ± 56.6 min, P = 0.86) did not differ significantly between group 1 and 2. There was a trend towards a shorter circulatory arrest time (50.72 ± 9.6 vs 44.7 ± 15.5 min; P = 0.20) in group 2. Perioperative mortality was 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62). Stroke occurred in 10% (5.9% vs 13%; P = 0.62) of patients. Spinal cord injury occurred in 7.5% of patients (11.8% vs 4.3% P = 0.57). Due to the a proximal aortic anastomosis, there was a significantly shorter coverage of the descending aorta with the prosthesis ending at vertebral level Th7.5 (6.75-8) in group 1 versus Th6.0 (5.0-6.0) in group 2 (P-value = 0.004). Implantation of the frozen elephant trunk prosthesis in zone 1 allows for a more proximal aortic anastomosis that could make the procedure more feasible especially in patients with difficult anatomies or in an acute setting.

A 10-Year Experience Using a Hybrid Endovascular Approach to Treat Aberrant Subclavian Arterial Aneurysms

This study was a retrospective review of a single-center experience between 2006 and 2016. Ten patients with aberrant right subclavian artery aneurysms presented with dysphagia (n = 9) or acute type B dissection (n = 1). All patients underwent revascularization and exclusion of both subclavian arteries to enable >20 mm proximal aortic fixation distal to the common carotid origins for the arch TEVAR. Patients were treated with bilateral upper extremity revascularization using carotid-subclavian polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses (n = 17) or subclavian transposition (n = 3), distal aberrant subclavian exclusion by surgical ligation (n = 9) or embolization with an Amplatzer II plug (n = 11), and aneurysm exclusion with TEVARs. Extra-anatomic revascularization and TEVARs were staged by 1 to 2 days in most cases to minimize potential airway edema from bilateral neck exposures. No major complications occurred including spinal cord ischemia, stroke, cranial nerve deficit, arm ischemia, access site complications, or wound complications. A hybrid repair technique to treat aberrant subclavian arterial aneurysm is associated with low operative morbidity, good long-term durability, and symptomatic relief of esophageal compression.

A 10-Year Experience Using a Hybrid Endovascular Approach to Treat Aberrant Subclavian Arterial Aneurysms

The aim of the study was to describe a single-center experience using combined extra-anatomic open arch branch revascularization with aortic arch endovascular exclusion for treatment of aberrant subclavian artery aneurysms. All patients undergoing management of aberrant subclavian aneurysms were identified from a prospective patient registry. Means of revascularization included carotid-subclavian bypass or subclavian transposition, and origin occlusion was performed by surgical ligation or endovascular embolization at surgeon discretion. Completion of aneurysm exclusion was performed using available distal arch/thoracic aortic endografts (TEVARs) using standard oversizing. Procedures were staged as appropriate based on patient condition. Ten patients, 8 females and 2 males ranging from 32 to 85years of age, were identified. Presenting symptoms were dysphagia (n=9) and acute type B aortic dissection (n=1). All patients required revascularization/exclusion of bilateral subclavian arteries to enable >20mm proximal aortic fixation distal to the common carotid origins for the arch endograft. TEVAR with planned coverage of both subclavian origins extending into the proximal descending thoracic aorta was performed using transfemoral access (n=9) or iliac conduit (n=1) and required a single device (100-157mm) in all cases except the aortic dissection which required total length coverage of the descending thoracic aorta. Extra-anatomic revascularization and thoracic endografting were staged by 1-2days in most cases to minimize potential airway edema from bilateral neck exposures. Subclavian revascularization was performed by carotid-subclavian bypass using polytetrafluoroethylene (n=17) or subclavian transposition (n=3) with proximal occlusion using embolization with an Amplatzer II plug (n=11) or ligation (n=9). No major complications occurred including spinal cord ischemia, stroke, cranial nerve deficit, arm ischemia, access site complications, or wound complications. Length of stay ranged from 6 to 21days with all patients having resolution of dysphagia on follow-up (mean 41months). Directed imaging was available for 7 patients demonstrating the absence of endoleak, regression or stability of aneurysm size, and patency of all subclavian revascularizations. We present a hybrid repair technique with low operative morbidity that has shown to be durable in follow-up and to provide symptomatic relief for patients with aberrant subclavian artery aneurysms causing esophageal compression.