Extra-articular Reconstruction Research Articles

Ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) synthetic grafts are safe and effective for medial collateral ligament and posterolateral corner reconstructions in elite athletes.

This study documents the efficacy and safety of using a Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) ligament graft to augment extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions in elite athletes by reporting return-to-play(RTP) rates and levels, career longevityand complications. A consecutive series of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions augmented by LARS ligaments in elite athletes undertaken by three specialist sports knee surgeons between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Seventy-six elite athletes, aged over 16 years old, and more than 2 years postsurgery were included. RTPwas defined as competing at professional levelor national/international level in amateur sport. There were 64 medial collateral ligament (MCL) and 12 posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstructions. Fifty-two (68.4%) underwent concomitant autograft cruciate ligament(s) reconstruction. The mean age was 25.1 years (SD ± 4.5). Most were football (35, 46.1%) or rugby players (35, 46.1%). Sixty-seven athletes (88.2%) RTP with 65 (97.0%) of these playing at the same or higher Tegner level. Fifty-six (83.6%) of the athletes that RTP were still playing at 2 years postsurgery. Twenty (57.1%) of those who had RTP and were more than 5 years postsurgery were still playing at 5 years. Six (7.9%) players required further surgery relating to the LARS/metalwork. One case had soft tissue inflammation adjacent to the proximal end of the synthetic graft, but it is unknown if this was mechanical irritation or a biological reaction. One MCL reruptured 4 years after RTP. Utilising LARS to augment extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions allows 88.2% of athletes with a variety of knee ligament injuries to return to elite sport. The low morbidity rates coupled with 57% of athletes still playing 5 years postsurgery demonstrates that the LARS is safe and effective in these cases. Although there are reports of LARS ligaments being used in MCL and PLC reconstructions, there is very little evidence investigating if they are safe and effective. This study demonstrates that LARS synthetic grafts can be safely used for MCL and PLC reconstructions in elite athletes and they permit a high RTP with a low risk of complications. Level IV.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 3-Incision Technique With Allograft Quad Tendon ACL Reconstruction

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are becoming more common in younger and older athletes. Approximately 250,000 ACL injuries occur each year, requiring the need for an effective and reproducible surgical technique. Indications: The 3-incision outside-in technique utilizes the donor quadriceps tendon, an extraordinarily strong graft, without damage from autogenous harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstrings. While some data suggest higher re-rupture risk with donor tissue, this is counterbalanced by avoiding secondary surgical site damage. Technique Description: The ruptured ACL is removed and the intercondylar notch is cleaned to visualize the anatomical ACL insertion site. Using the 3-tunnel technique a gaff is passed through the intercondylar notch, through a puncture hole (incision 1) and a rear entry guide hooked to its tip. The guide point is pulled into the knee and placed in posterior aspect of the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. Through incision 2, a guide pin is drilled to this point and overdrilled with a 10-mm drill. The edges of the hole in the intercodylar notch are smoothed with a currette. The tibial footprint is cleared, a tibial aiming guide placed. Through incision 3, a guide pin is placed and over drilled with a 10-mm drill followed by a Gore-Tex reamer to ensure no impingement would inhibit graft passage. The proximal bone of a quadriceps tendon graft is sized through a 10-mm sizer and compacted. Two holes are drilled to hold sutures for the proximal aspect of the femoral graft. The quadriceps tendon graft is sized to fit through a 9-mm tunnel and the free end whipped with a stitch before being passed from outside-in through the smoothed tunnels. The femoral bone block is tapped to have a press fit initially and then is fixed with a Milagro screw. The knee is cycled ten times to remove slack and the interference fit guide pin is placed on the anterior aspect of the graft, and fixed with the knee at 15° to 30° of flexion. Stability is tested with confirmation of no impingement, and then an extra-articular reconstruction with a semitendinosus allograft is performed. The extra articular reconstruction is placed at the point between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head, passed under the skin and the iliotibial band, and then inserted just anterior and superior to the ACL femoral drill hole. Results: Patient outcomes in our initial experience are comparable to our autogenous bone-tendon-bone (BTB) procedures without anterior knee pain. Return to sport is similar with autogenous procedures, with a delay of 6 to 12 months. In addition, there is a possibility for acceleration of healing with the addition of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid between 1 and 3 months postsurgery. We have insufficient data so far to determine if the re-rupture rate will decline compared with reported outcomes. Conclusion: The 3-incision technique with allograft quadriceps tendon for ACL reconstruction is a reproducible surgical technique that avoids harvest from the patient's own body. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic Physeal Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries among young patients have increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to present a physeal-sparing intra- and extra-articular reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons autograft. In recent years, the management of these injuries in the pediatric population has become increasingly surgical to restore knee function and reduce the risk of meniscal and chondral injury due to persistent knee instability. However, this is a population at high risk for ACL graft rupture, but it can be lowered by an addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). This study shows the pearls and pitfalls of an arthroscopic physeal-sparing ACL reconstruction combined with a concomitant LET using hamstrings autograft.

EXTRA-ARTICULAR KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONS USING LIGAMENT AUGMENTATION AND RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM (LARS) SYNTHETIC GRAFTS IN ELITE ATHLETES

IntroductionTo determine if elite athletes can return to professional sport after MCL or posterolateral (PLC) reconstruction using LARS ligaments. The secondary aims are to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LARS by reporting sport longevity, subsequent surgeries, and complications.MethodsA retrospective review of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions, utilising a LARS synthetic ligament, by 3 sports knee surgeons between 2013 and 2020 was undertaken. All elite athletes aged over 16 years and a minimum of 2 years post reconstruction were included. No LARS were used for ACL reconstructions, and they were excluded if a LARS ligament was used for a PCL reconstruction. Return to play (RTP) was defined as competing at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport.ResultsSixty-four (84.2%) MCL reconstructions and 12 (15.8%) PLC reconstructions were included. 52 (68.4%) underwent concomitant autograft cruciate(s) reconstruction including 6 (7.8%) bicruciate reconstructions. The mean age was 25.1 years (SD +/− 4.50). 35 (46.1%) were footballers and 35 (46.1%) were rugby players. Sixty-seven athletes (88.2%) returned to elite sport, 7 (9.2%) did not RTP and RTP status was unknown for 2 (2.6%) (Figure 1). 65 out of 67 (97.0%) RTP at the same/higher Tegner level. 56 (83.6%) and 20 (57.1%) were still playing at 2- and 5-years post-surgery Six (7.9%) players required further surgery due to irritation from the metal fixation implants. One had an inflammation adjacent to the synthetic material at the femoral end and the other cases involved the tibial staples. All six cases were able to RTP. One athlete, following bicruciate /MCL surgery had the LARS removed due to laxity. There was one MCL re-rupture, sustained while jumping, 4 years after returning to football.ConclusionsUtilising LARS in extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions allows 88.2% of athletes with a variety of knee ligament injuries to return to elite sport. The results compare well regarding RTP, complication, and revision rates with the published evidence for other types of MCL and PLC grafts. This, coupled with 57% of athletes still playing 5 years post-surgery suggests the LARS is safe and effective in these cases.For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly.

The Mini Bone Extra-articular Reconstruction System for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity—Surgical Technique With Cadaveric Quantification of Surrounding Anatomy

We present a novel surgical technique, the mini Bone Extra-articular Reconstruction (BEAR) system, that involves minimally invasive all BEAR systems. The surgical technique was used to perform the medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy, Evans osteotomy, and Cotton osteotomy on 9 cadaveric feet under fluoroscopic guidance. We also present a case series of patients who have undergone the procedure. We first carefully dissected the sural nerve, superficial peroneal nerve, and its branches from each cadaveric foot and evaluated injuries following the mini-BEAR osteotomy cuts. We then measured and recorded the distance between the osteotomy cuts and these anatomic structures. We believe that this technique can potentially replace the multiple long surgical incisions with minimal ones. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Iliotibial Band Autograft in Skeletally Immature Prepubescent Children: A Physeal-Sparing Technique

Background: As there has been an increasing incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in children and adolescents in the past few decades, nonoperative management is seen to result in less favorable clinical outcomes, resulting in meniscal and cartilage damage, and arthritic changes. Despite the risk of iatrogenic physeal injuries with operative approach, several reconstruction options, such as physeal-sparing techniques for skeletally immature patients, are described to restore joint stability. Indications: We bring a combined extra-articular and intra-articular ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous iliotibial band (ITB), which is indicated for prepubescent patients (Tanner stages 1 or 2) with open physes, significant growth potential (≤11 years for girls and ≤12 years for boys) and smaller knees, where an all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction would lack epiphyseal space Technique Description: The technique consists of a modified MacIntosh intra-articular and extra-articular ITB reconstruction, described by Micheli and further characterized by Kocher. The central portion of the ITB is harvested proximally (at least 15 cm) and left attached to Gerdy's tubercle distally. The harvested graft is brought from over-the-top posteriorly and passed under the intermeniscal ligament anteriorly through an epiphyseal groove on the tibia. Results: The outcomes shown for the Kocher ITB ACL reconstruction technique are favorable at a mean follow-up of 5.3 years: from 44 patients, 41 returned to sports involving cutting or pivoting, and the revision rate was low at 4.5%. Discussion/Conclusion: The awareness of physeal injury related to the operative treatment of ACL tears in the pediatric population has resulted in several physeal-sparing and physeal-respecting techniques of reconstruction. Some of these have shown to reduce the risk of physeal damage, maintaining stability and providing excellent functional outcomes, with low revision rates in long-term follow-up and minimal risk of growth disturbance. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Necrotizing Fasciitis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Treated with Debridement, Free Flap, and Extra-Articular Reconstruction.

Necrotizing fasciitis of the foot is a relatively rare diagnosis and has traditionally been treated with distal amputation. A 30-year-old diabetic man with Charcot-Marie-Tooth muscular atrophy developed necrotizing fasciitis of the dorsal foot and underwent surgical debridement resulting in a significant wound with exposed tendons. Serial debridements were performed, eventually followed by a staged free flap reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap. After allowing time for flap healing, subsequent staged equinovarus reconstruction was also performed successfully. There were no flap or postoperative complications, and the patient is progressing as expected. Flap refinement procedures have been used to enhance cosmetic and functional outcomes. This report not only showcases the success of a procedure high on the reconstructive ladder in a patient at high risk for complications but also highlights an approach in which functional recovery is also optimized successfully in a planned staged multidisciplinary manner.

Risk Factors for Symptomatic Cyclops Lesion Formation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Objective To evaluate the incidence of symptomatic cyclops lesions requiring surgical treatment after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to establish possible intraoperative risk factors related to it. Methods Three hundred and eighty-nine patients aged between 18 and 50 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into groups according to the presence or absence of symptomatic cyclops lesions, and their characteristics were compared. Patients with associated lesions that required additional surgical procedures (except anterolateral extra-articular procedures) were not included. The rate of symptomatic cyclops lesions was recorded and the following parameters were evaluated: age, gender, time from injury to surgery, graft type and diameter, femoral tunnel perforation technique, fixation type, presence of knee hyperextension, preservation of the ACL remnant, associated anterolateral extra-articular procedure, associated meniscal injury and participation in sports. Results 389 patients were evaluated and 26 (6.7%) patients developed cyclops. The patients with and without cyclops lesions did not differ in age, time from injury to surgery, graft type or diameter, surgical technique, femoral fixation method, presence of knee hyperextension, remnant preservation and associated meniscal injury. The group with cyclops lesion had a higher proportion of females (10 (38.4%) vs 68 (18.7%); OR = 2.7; p = 0.015), higher proportion of extra-articular reconstruction (18 (11.8%) vs 8 (3.4%); OR = 3.8; p = 0.001) and higher proportion of sports practice (23 (8.6%) vs 3 (2.5%); OR = 3.6; p = 0.026). Conclusion In our series, 6.7% of the patients required arthroscopic removal of cyclops lesions. Female gender, associated extra-articular reconstruction and sports practice were factors related to this lesion. Remnant preservation had no relationship with cyclops lesion formation.

EXTRA-ARTICULAR KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONS USING LARS (LIGAMENT AUGMENTATION AND RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM) SYNTHETIC GRAFTS IN ELITE ATHLETES

AbstractIntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine if elite athletes could return to professional sport after MCL or PLC reconstruction using LARS ligaments and to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LARS by reporting sport longevity, subsequent surgeries and complications.MethodsA retrospective review of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions in elite athletes utilising LARS ligaments by 3 knee surgeons between January 2013 and October 2020 was undertaken. Return to play (RTP) was defined as competing at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport.ResultsSixty-four (84.2%) MCL and 12 (15.8%) PLC reconstructions utilising LARS in elite athletes were included. 52 (68.4%) underwent concomitant cruciate(s) reconstruction. The mean age was 25.1 years (SD +/− 4.50. Most were football (35, 46.1%) or rugby players (35, 46.1%).Sixty-seven athletes (88.2%) RTP with 65 (97.0%) of these playing at the same or higher Tegner level. 56 (83.6%) and 20 (57.1%) were still playing at 2 and 5 years post-surgery.Six (7.9%) players (5 of whom RTP) required further surgery relating to the LARS / metalwork and there was one case of adverse local inflammatory reaction to the synthetic material. There was one MCL re-rupture, sustained 4 years after RTP.ConclusionUtilising LARS in extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions allows 88.2% of athletes, with a variety of knee ligament injuries, to return to elite sport. The low morbidity rates coupled with 57% of athletes still playing 5 years post-surgery suggests the LARS is safe and effective in these cases.

Comparative Success of Repair Versus Reconstruction for Knee Extra-articular Ligament Injuries.

Surgical techniques and associated outcomes in treating acute and chronic extra-articular ligament knee injuries are in evolution, and there is question as to whether repair or reconstruction is optimal. The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent surgery rate between surgical repair versus reconstruction for all extra-articular ligament injuries of the knee utilizing a large database. Our hypothesis was that overall surgical repair of both lateral and medial extra-articular knee injuries would have a higher revision rate than those treated by reconstruction. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. The PearlDiver Mariner data set (2010-2019), with 122 million patients, was utilized to generate 2 patient cohorts: those who underwent surgical repair and those who underwent surgical reconstruction of a knee extra-articular ligament injury. All patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Rates of concomitant or subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction and rates of secondary procedures were assessed and compared between the 2 cohorts. In total, 3563 patients were identified: extra-articular ligament reconstruction was performed for 2405 (67.5%), and repair was performed for 1158 (32.5%). Cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed for 986 (27.7%), of which 888 of 986 (90.1%) were performed on the same day as their extra-articular ligament procedure. At 2-year follow-up, the reconstruction cohort had higher rates of revision surgery compared with the repair cohort (8.2% vs 2.5%; P < .001). Using a large national database, knee extra-articular ligamentous reconstructions (those on both the lateral and the medial side) had a 3.3 times higher rate of revision surgery compared with repair at 2-year follow-up. Further study is needed to investigate the causes leading to revision surgery and to determine the optimal surgical treatment for both medial and lateral extra-articular knee ligament injuries.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Better Restores Knee Stability and Reduces Failure Rates Than Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients

Background: The increase in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in pediatric patients and the high failure rate reported in the literature in this population are driving surgeons to search for specific techniques to better restore knee stability. Recent literature has reported that the combination of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and ACL reconstruction improves outcomes in high-risk patients. However, such advantages in pediatric patients have been infrequently evaluated. Purpose: To assess whether adding LET to ACL reconstruction can significantly improve knee stability, clinical outcomes, and failure rates in pediatric patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A multicentric study involving 3 orthopaedic teaching centers was conducted to evaluate pediatric patients aged between 12 and 16 years who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction using a physeal-sparing femoral tunnel drilling technique. A minimum 2-year follow-up evaluation was required. Based on the surgical technique performed, the patients were divided into 2 group. The patients in group 1 underwent an isolated arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, while the patients in group 2 had an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in combination with a modified Lemaire LET procedure. Group 1 was a historical control cohort of patients, whereas group 2 was prospectively enrolled. All the patients included in the present study were clinically evaluated using the Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) subjective score and the Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS) score. Anteroposterior knee stability was measured using the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer, and the objective pivot-shift evaluation was documented using a triaxial accelerometer (Kinematic Rapid Assessment [KiRA]). The included patients also underwent a standardized radiological protocol to evaluate leg-length discrepancies, axial deviation, and degenerative signs preoperatively and at last follow-up. Results: This study included 66 pediatric patients with an anatomic hybrid ACL reconstruction using an autologous 4-strand hamstring graft. In group 1, there were 34 patients (mean age, 13.5 ± 1.2 years), while 32 patients (mean age, 13.8 ± 1.4 years) were included in group 2. The clinical outcome scores showed no difference between the 2 groups (Pedi-IKDC, P = .072; Pedi-FABS, P = .180). Nevertheless, the patients in group 2 had better anteroposterior stability measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer (1.9 ± 1.1 mm in group 1 vs 0.8 ± 0.8 mm in group 2; P = .031), as well as better rotational stability measured using the KiRA (–0.59 ± 1.05 m/s2 in group 2 vs 0.98 ± 1.12 m/s2 in group 1; P = .012). The patients in group 1 returned to sports at the same competitive level at a rate of 82.4%, while patients included in group 2 returned at the same competitive level in 90.6% of the cases without a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .059). No leg-length discrepancies were found between the 2 groups at last follow-up (P = .881). Two patients displayed an increased valgus deformity of 3° on the operated limb at last follow-up (1 patient in group 1 and 1 patient in group 2). Group 1 had a significatively higher cumulative failure rate (14.7% vs 6.3%; P = .021). No intra- or postoperative complications was observed between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Performing a modified Lemaire LET along with an ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft in pediatric patients reduced the cumulative failure rate and improved objective stability with no increase in intra- or postoperative complications. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of patient-reported outcomes or in the return-to-sports activity.

Minimally Invasive Foot &amp; Ankle Surgery: A Review and a Novel Technique

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: There has been a growing interest in the utility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to correct foot and ankle deformities. MIS is performed using small, targeted incisions rather than large incisions required of open procedures. Proposed benefits of MIS include preservation of blood supply, limited injury to adjacent soft tissue, and fewer wound complications amongst many others. (Neufeld et al, Lu et al). To date, a large number of minimally invasive techniques have been developed to treat common deformities such as hallux valgus, hammertoe, and bunionette. However, there is no brief review that summarizes the literature comparing open surgery with its minimally invasive counterpart. Additionally the options available for MIS treatment of Flexible Adult Acquired Flat Foot/Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity have failed to keep pace. Methods: We will begin by synthesizing data on MIS in the foot and ankle through analysis of those three aforementioned deformities, summarizing both technique and associated research. Then, we will introduce a novel technique for stage II (flexible) flat foot correction, the Mini-BEAR (bone extra articular reconstruction). Historically treated with the now largely insufficient FDL transfer, we believe this new technique will not only prove biomechanically efficacious but also lead to improved patient safety and lower complication rates. The rapid pace at which novel MIS procedures are developed requires surgeons to be disciplined in conducting and analyzing studies; this synopsis will aim to aid in that process. Results: A novel surgical technique that involves a minimally invasive, all bone extra-articular reconstruction (Mini-BEAR) system. We believe that this technique can potentially replace the multiple long surgical incisions that accompany the traditional medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy, lateral column lengthening, and Cotton procedures with minimal ones, reduce post-operative recovery time, reduce operating room procedure time, and produce a better cosmetic result. Additionally, we believe it will reduce narcotic use secondary to less pain by virtue of less surgical work on the patient. We have also performed a cadaveric anatomic study that qualitatively and quantitatively observed the tendinous and neurovascular structures at risk with the Mini- BEAR procedure. Conclusion: The majority of the publications on the use of MIS to address deformities in the foot and ankle are small cohort studies or retrospective case reviews; many of which lack a control group. Due to this, data showing improvements in MIS vs open techniques is rare. However this is to be expected in a newer, developing field and as larger studies are performed there is optimism that this trend may change. (attached file is example of chart, we have similar format for all 4 deformities discussed in this paper)

Physeal-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Autograft in the Skeletally Immature Knee

Conventional adult anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques are controversial in skeletally immature patients due to the risk of iatrogenic physeal damage and potential growth disturbance. The physeal-sparing, combined intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autogenous iliotibial band was developed to mitigate this risk in prepubescent, skeletally immature patients, with excellent functional outcomes and a low revision rate. This article describes the surgical details of this reproducible reconstruction technique.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Lateral Extra-Articular Reconstruction

AbstractThe anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has received renewed research interest because of the potential role of this anatomic region in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear biomechanics and surgical treatment outcomes. The primary structures of the ALC include the iliotibial band deep (Kaplan) fibers, the anterolateral ligament (ALL), and the capsulo-osseous layer (COL) of the iliotibial band, although there remains disagreement on the precise anatomic locations and biomechanical relevance of these structures. Sectioning studies in the ACL-deficient knee have revealed a contribution of the ALC in restraining tibial internal rotation and anterior translation. Biomechanical studies have revealed a potential role for lateral extra-articular reconstruction as an augmentation to ACL reconstruction in knees with combined ACL and ALC sectioning. Clinical studies have reported a reduced ACL reconstruction failure rate with both ALL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures.

Imaging Findings of Complications After Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis of the Knee: A Current Concepts Review.

Background:Despite successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, many patients continue to experience persistent anterolateral rotatory instability. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is used to address this instability by harvesting a portion of the iliotibial band, passing it underneath the fibular collateral ligament, and attaching it just proximal and posterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle. Based on the most recent clinical evidence, the addition of LET to ACL reconstruction improves clinical outcomes, which has led to an increase in the use of this technique.Purpose:To provide an overview of the postoperative complications of the LET procedure and their associated imaging findings, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Study Design:Narrative review.Methods:In this scoping review, the authors reviewed available radiographic, computed tomography, and MRI scans of patients who experienced postoperative complications after ACL reconstruction with LET, in which the complication was determined to be from the LET procedure. Images were reviewed and subsequently described by an on-staff musculoskeletal radiologist.Results:The authors found 9 different complications associated with LET: graft failure, hematoma, infection, chronic pain, tunnel convergence, fixation device migration, muscular hernia, peroneal nerve palsy, and knee stiffness. They supplemented these findings with radiographic evidence from 6 patients.Conclusion:As extra-articular reconstruction techniques including LET become more popular among orthopaedic surgeons, it is important that radiologists and surgeons be adept at recognizing the normal imaging findings of LET and associated complications.

Postoperative radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft nonunion reconstruction: Can the lateral paratricipital approach prevent this common complication?

BackgroundPostoperative radial nerve palsy (RNP) is a well-known complication of nonunion reconstruction of the humerus. The purpose of the current study is to determine if the surgical approach for nonunion reconstruction of the humerus influences the rate of postoperative radial nerve palsy. MethodsA retrospective case-control study of all humeral shaft and extraarticular distal humerus nonunion reconstructions performed between January 1, 2004, and August 31, 2021, was conducted. Patients included were over 18 years of age, had a non-pathologic humerus fracture nonunion and had intact radial nerve function prior to nonunion reconstruction. Exclusion criteria consisted of nonunions involving the proximal humerus, intraarticular fractures, and reconstructive treatment procedures with either intramedullary nail or external fixation methods. Perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed in regard to the development of postoperative RNP. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the interaction of significant variables on the development of postoperative RNP. ResultsThe overall rate of postoperative RNP in this series was 6/53 (11%). However, no cases of postoperative radial nerve palsy were observed in patients who underwent nonunion reconstruction with a lateral paratricipital approach. A new RNP was seen in 4/9 (44%) of those patients who underwent a triceps splitting approach, which was significantly higher than those utilizing either an anterolateral approach (2/28, 7%) or a lateral paratricipital approach (0/16, 0%, p = 0.007). Discussion and conclusionOur data suggests that the lateral paratricipital exposure decreases the risk of radial nerve injury with nonunion reconstruction of the humerus. The lateral paratricipital exposure offers the benefit of radial nerve exploration, decompression, neurolysis and protection prior to fracture manipulation and instrumentation. This study shows conventional approaches may predispose patients to a high rate of postoperative RNP, similar to that in the literature.

The Addition of Either an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or an Iliotibial Band Tenodesis Is Associated With a Lower Failure Rate After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Trial

To compare the failure rate in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction alone or associated with an extra-articular procedure. Secondary objectives were to compare ACL laxity, patient-reported outcome measures, and complication rates in these patients and, subsequently, to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction associated with anatomical anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). This was a retrospective comparative study. Patients were classified into 2 groups, according to whether (group 2) or not (group 1) an extra-articular reconstruction was performed. Patients who underwent an extra-articular procedure were further divided into ALL reconstruction (group 2A) and LET (group 2B). Baseline demographic variables, operative data and postoperative data were evaluated. The groups with (86 patients) and without (88 patients) an associated extra-articular reconstruction had similar preoperative data. Group 2 had a lower failure rate (4.6% vs 14.7%; P= .038), better KT-1000, better pivot-shift, and better Lysholm. There was no difference regarding complications, except more lateral pain in group 2. Regarding the groups who underwent ALL reconstruction (41 patients) and LET (46 patients), group 2A showed better Lysholm scores. Both groups had similar failure rates and complications. Patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with a laterally based augmentation procedure had a lower failure rate than patients who underwent isolated revision ACL reconstruction. KT-1000 and pivot-shift examination were also significantly better when a lateral augmentation was performed. Complications were similar except for an increase in lateral pain in the augmented group. No clinically important differences were found when comparing the LET group to the ALL group other than a statistical improvement in the Lysholm functional scale, likely not clinically meaningful, favoring the ALL group and an increased duration of post-operative lateral pain in the LET group. III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Paper 28: Early Versus Standard Return to Sport Following ACL Reconstruction. Impact on Volume of Play and Career Logevity in 180 Professional European Soccer Players

Objectives:To retrospectively evaluate the impact of early(<6 months) vs standard(>6months) return to play(RTP) on the rate of failure, volume of play, and career longevity following ACL reconstruction in a cohort of professional European soccer players. It was hypothesized that athletes returning to professional competition earlier than 6 month after ACL reconstruction would not have an increased risk of failure, volume of play, and a shorter professional career.Methods:Professional soccer players treated for anterior cruciate ligament tear by a single surgeon were included in this retrospective study. The study was approved by the institutional review board. The inclusion criteria were that the patient was a (1) male, (2) professional soccer player with an (3) injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. Exclusion criteria were revision ACL, extra-articular ligamentous reconstruction, and previous contralateral ACL reconstruction. A total of 178 players who were all in the first or second division of their league met criteria for the study over a ten year period. Time from intervention to return to the first official game was recorded in days. Information if the patient was able to return to the same season was recorded, as well as the number of games and total and average minutes played in the return season. Number of seasons played after injury and if the player was active at the time of data collection (September 2019) was also recorded. If the player was still active, the player’s current club was recorded.Results:90-early RTP and 88 standard RTP players were identified. Players in the early RTP group returned to professional level soccer at a mean of 4.76 months, which was significantly sooner than players in the standard RTP group who returned at a mean of 9.21 months (p < 0.01) following ACLR. A significantly greater number of players in the early RTP group returned during the same season of intervention (n = 56/92, 60.9%) than in the standard RTP group (n = 18/88, 20.5%) (p < 0.01). Players in the early RTP group competed in an average of 11.5 games during their return season while those in the standard RTP group competed in an average of 12.9 games (p > 0.05). The early RTP group played, on average, a total of 759.2 minutes and 56.5 minutes/game in their return season, while the standard RTP group played an average of 812.8 total minutes and 50.0 minutes/game in their return season (p > 0.05). Players in the early RTP group had significantly longer careers following ACLR, averaging 5.62 seasons, compared to those in the standard RTP group who competed in an average of 4.75 seasons after surgical intervention (p < 0.01). The early RTP group had 4 failures while the late RTP group had 1 failure failure.Conclusions:Professional European soccer players who return to play earlier than 6 months after ACL reconstruction returned more frequently during the same season, played the same number of games and minutes during their return season, had longer careers, but had more ACL graft failures when compared with those who returned greater than 6 months after surgery. Professional European soccer players who returned early after ACL reconstruction (<6 months) did not appear to have poorer outcomes, however caution should be taken before extrapolating this to the general population as these athletes have exceptional resources, fitness, and athletic capacity. Decision on return to play ultimately lies with the patient/athlete as prolonged RTP has significant financial and career consequences.

Optimal Combination of Femoral Tunnel Orientation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Inside-out Femoral Technique Combined With an Anterolateral Extra-articular Reconstruction

Background: The optimal orientation of the anterolateral extra-articular reconstruction (ALLR) femoral tunnel to avoid collision with the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) femoral tunnel is not clearly defined in the literature. Purpose: To define the optimal combination of orientations of the ALLR femoral tunnel and the ACLR femoral tunnel using an inside-out technique to minimize risk of collision between these tunnels. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging scans of 40 knees after an isolated ACLR with an inside-out femoral technique was used to assess the collision risk between ACLR and virtual ALLR tunnels. The optimal ACLR tunnel orientation was defined as having the safest distance from the ALLR tunnel. A second collision analysis was performed on all patients presenting with an optimal orientation of the ACLR tunnel to then define the optimal ALLR tunnel orientation. The potential for trochlear damage was also studied. A collision risk of 0% to 5% was considered acceptable and referred to as “low risk.” Results: The only ALLR tunnel orientation presenting a low risk of collision with the ACLR tunnel was with an axial angle of 40° anteriorly and a coronal angle of 0°. This orientation presented a 48% risk of trochlear damage with the guide wire of the ALLR tunnel. The more posterior the orientation of the ACLR, the larger the distance from the ALLR tunnel. Among the 22 patients presenting with an optimal ACLR tunnel (alpha angle superior to 40°), the ALLR tunnels aimed with 1 of these 3 orientations presented a low risk of tunnel collision and trochlear damage: 40° axial and 10° coronal, 35° axial and 5° coronal, or 30° axial and 0° coronal. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: To minimize risk of tunnel collision or trochlear damage when combining an inside-out ACLR with an ALLR, the ACLR tunnel should be performed with a posterior orientation (alpha angle >40°), and the ALLR tunnel should be aimed with 1 of 3 orientations: 40° axial and 10° coronal, 35° axial and 5° coronal, or 30° axial and 0° coronal.

One-Stage ACL Revision Using a Bone Allograft Plug for a Semianatomic Tibial Tunnel That Is Too Anterior

Revision of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be performed as a one-stage or two-stage surgery. Several factors must be taken into consideration when making this choice, especially the size and position of the existing tunnels. When the tibial tunnel is semianatomic, it is difficult to make a new tunnel in the correct position without overlapping the existing tunnel. For this reason, we have developed a one-stage ACL revision surgery that uses a bone allograft plug. When it comes to choosing a reconstruction technique, we believe that combined intra-articular and extra-articular reconstruction with the iliotibial band is suitable when the hamstring tendons are not available, combined with clinical findings of translational and rotational instability. Because the existing tunnels require reorientation, a new femoral tunnel can be created by outside-in drilling to eliminate the risk of overlap, while an allograft bone plug can be used to fill the overly anterior tibial tunnel and allow us to drill the correct tibial tunnel right away. In our hands, this is a safe and effective technique, but longer follow-up is needed to validate its indications.