Neutral External Rotation Research Articles

A Modified Arthroscopic Outside-in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness.

Arthroscopic release is effective for patients with shoulder stiffness, but the traditional inside-out procedure cannot effectively alleviate the mobility of some severe stiff shoulder and even cause itrogenic injuries sometimes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and advantages of a modified outside-in shoulder release approach for severe shoulder stiffness. Included in this retrospective study were 15 patients (five male and 10 female) with severe shoulder stiffness who underwent modified outside-in shoulder release surgery at our hospital between June 2019 and March 2021. Of them, 10 patients had a primary frozen shoulder and five had secondary shoulder stiffness, involving the right shoulder in six cases and the left shoulder in nine cases. The mean age of the 15 patients was 56.7 (34-69) years. The patients were instructed to exercise passively from second-day post-operation and enhance the rehabilitation exercise gradually. All patients received a range of motion (ROM) examination before and after surgery. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's Score (ASES), Constant Score (CS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. All data were tested by normal distribution first and then by paired T test, otherwise by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The mean follow-up period was 18.2 (12-33) months. Compared with the preoperative value, the mean ASES score at the final follow-up improved from 38.4 ± 7.37 to 88.13 ± 6.33 points; the mean CS score from 43.27 ± 6.71 to 78.74 ± 6.93 points; the mean VAS score from 5.07 ± 1.03 to 0.81 ± 0.83 points; forward flexion from 81.93° ± 11.45° to 156.73° ± 9.12°; abduction from 65.93° ± 16.82° to 144.80° ± 8.83°; neutral external rotation from 13.53° ± 10.38° to 51.20° ± 4.77°; internal rotation from the buttock to waist (L3), all showing a significant difference (P< 0.0001). No serious complication was observed in any patient during the postoperative follow-up periods. The present study has demonstrated that the modified arthroscopic outside-in shoulder release approach can improve ROM of patients and alleviate pain effectively, proving it to be an appropriate surgical option for the treatment of severe shoulder stiffness.

Electromyographic and kinematic study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) procedures have significantly increased in the last decade as an alternative to the current treatments for cuff-tear arthropathy. Since Grammont's theory in 1987, few data about the invivo kinetics of the shoulder-girdle musculature in patients with RTSA have been available. The goals of this study are to (1) describe the contribution of principal muscles around the shoulder by electromyographyand (2) access the range of motion of 5 movements of patients with RTSA compared with normal shoulders. This is an observational prospective cohort study of 21 patients divided into 11 patients with RTSA and 10 controls. The muscular activity was recorded with bipolar cutaneous electrodes, whereas the range of motionwas synchronized and recorded by 8 motion cameras. Five movements (flexion, abduction, neutral external rotation, external rotation in 90° of abduction, and internal rotation in 90° of abduction) were studied. The upper trapezius is the main activator in all directions with early and constant activity (P < .01). The latissimus dorsi demonstrates increased muscular activity in internal rotation (P < .01) as well as the posterior deltoid in external rotation in the RTSA group compared with control (P < .01). RTSA shoulder muscle activation is significantly different than in normal shoulders. The significant contribution of the trapezius in all directions, latissimus dorsi in internal rotation, and posterior deltoid in external rotation has never been described within the same study until today. New rehabilitation protocols targeting those muscles could demonstrate better and more homogeneous results and increase patient satisfaction.

Effects of different heel angles in sleep mode on heel interface pressure in the elderly

BackgroundThe heels are one of the most common sites of pressure ulcers, and the incidence rate in the elderly aged 70years or older is high. Although there is literature on heel interface pressure, the heel interface pressure of the elderly in different postures has not yet been explored, which will be investigated in this study, as well as the effects of different foot positions. Their skin conditions will also be examined. MethodsTwenty-five females and twenty-six males, 70years old or older, are evaluated while lying down, with only their naked foot in its natural position on a mattress, as well as placed on a standard or pressure-relieving mattress in different positions. The moisture, sebum content, and elasticity of the skin of the heel are tested. FindingsThe heel of most of the participants is positioned at a 60°–69° or 90°–99° angle to the support surface. The heel interface pressure is the greatest when the foot is upright. The age, weight, and body mass index have no significant impacts. The moisture and sebum content are extremely low while elasticity is normal. InterpretationThe relaxed position of the foot is in neutral external rotation and upright positions. A greater amount of pressure is experienced when the foot is upright. The pressure-relieving mattress is more effective for reducing heel pressure but may not apply to all cases. Finally, the skin of the heel is dry and lacks sebum, which implies greater risk of developing heel sores.

A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter‐V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability

To develop a standardized protocol for measurement of shoulder movements using a gravity inclinometer designed for use in clinical trials, and to assess its intra- and interrater reliability in a group of manipulative physiotherapists. After instruction, 6 manipulative physiotherapists independently assessed 8 movements of the shoulder, including total and glenohumeral flexion (TF, GHF), total and glenohumeral abduction (TA, GHA), external rotation in neutral (ERN) and abduction (ERA), internal rotation in abduction (IRA), and hand behind back (HBB), in random order in 6 patients with shoulder pain and stiffness according to a 6 x 6 Latin square design using the standardized protocol. The assessments were then repeated. Analysis of variance was used to partition total variability into components of variance in order to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The intra- and interrater reliability of the different movements varied widely. Reliability was higher for TF and TA than for the corresponding glenohumeral movements (e.g., intrarater ICCs: TF = 0.80, GHF = 0.65, TA = 0.75, GHA = 0.62). Interrater reliability was higher in the second round suggesting a practice effect (e.g., round 1, 2 interrater ICCs TF = 0.62, 0.82; TA = 0.62, 0.88; ERN = 0.85, 0.95). The measurement of the active range of TF, TA, ERN, and HBB, measured by manipulative physiotherapists following the standardized protocol, has intra- and interrater reliability acceptable for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials assessing interventions for shoulder pain.