External Ring Annuloplasty Research Articles

Aortic Valve Repair with External Annuloplasty in Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Patients.

Surgical repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is promising but underutilized due to perceived complexities and lack of long-term data. This study evaluated the efficacy of valve-sparing root remodeling (VSRR) or isolated valve repair combined with calibrated external ring annuloplasty in BAV versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. All patients operated on for aortic regurgitation and/or aneurysm at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included and entered into the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (AVIATOR). Patients with successful repair at index surgery (100% in the BAV group, 93% in the TAV group, p = 0.044) were included in a systemic follow-up with echocardiography at regular intervals. Among 132 patients, 58 were in the BAV (44%) and 74 in the TAV group (56%). There were no inter-group differences in preoperative patient characteristics, except BAV patients being significantly younger (47 ± 18 y vs. 60 ± 14 y, p < 0.001) and having narrower aortic roots at the level of sinuses (41 ± 6 mm vs. 46 ± 13 mm, p < 0.001) and sinotubular junctions (39 ± 10 mm vs. 42 ± 11, p = 0.032). No perioperative deaths were recorded. At four years, there was no significant difference in terms of overall survival (96.3% BAV vs. 97.2% TAV, p = 0.373), freedom from valve reintervention (85.2% BAV vs. 93.4% TAV, p = 0.905), and freedom from severe aortic regurgitation (94.1% BAV vs. 82.9% TAV, p = 0.222). Surgical repair of BAV combined with extra-aortic annuloplasty can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent mid-term results which are comparable to TAV repair.

Multicentre experience with valve-sparing aortic root replacement by means of combined remodelling and external aortic ring annuloplasty in patients with Marfan syndrome.

The most recent valve-sparing root replacement technique combines the advantages of the reimplantation (David) and remodelling (Yacoub) techniques. The aortic root is reconstructed according to the remodelling technique, the aortic valve is repaired according to the principle of effective height, and an external ring provides annular support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative and mid-term outcomes using this technique in patients with Marfan syndrome. Adult patients with Marfan syndrome who had an indication for aortic root surgery according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines and were operated on using this new root replacement technique were retrospectively evaluated. Follow-up was obtained from standard outpatient visits and included echocardiography. The study group comprised 22 patients (mean age 36 years, 68% males). Mean follow-up was 7.5 years. There were no mortalities. Two patients required aortic valve replacement because of aortic regurgitation. In both patients, the aortic root was severely dilated (≥65 mm) preoperatively, with grade III aortic valve regurgitation and aortic valve cusps that were very fragile. Aortic regurgitation was grade ≤I on follow-up in 18 of the remaining 20 patients. Valve-sparing root replacement using remodelling combined with aortic-ring annuloplasty is safe in patients with Marfan syndrome. The mid-term outcome is promising in patients undergoing elective valve-sparing root replacement at recommended root diameters. However, in patients with extremely dilated aortic roots and already severe aortic regurgitation, the technique should be used cautiously as aortic cusps are fragile and might not be suitable for durable repair. UMCG Research registry #11208.

Bicuspid valve repair outcomes are improved with reduction and stabilization of sinotubular junction and annulus with external annuloplasty

ObjectiveWe investigated long-term outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair, with external annuloplasty, according to aorta phenotype. MethodsBetween 2003 and 2020, all patients with BAV operated on for aortic insufficiency (AI) and/or aneurysm were included. Repairs included isolated AI repair with subvalvular with or without sinotubular junction (STJ) (single or double) annuloplasty, supracoronary aorta replacement (with or without hemiroot remodeling), and root remodeling with external subvalvular ring annuloplasty. ResultsAmong 343 patients operated, reparability rate was 81.3% (n = 279; age 46 ± 13.3 years). At 10 years (median follow-up: 3.42 years; interquartile range, 1.1, 5.8), survival was 93.9% (n = 8 deaths, similar to general population), cumulative incidence of reoperation was 6.2% (n = 10), AI grade >2 was 5.8% (n = 9), and grade >1 was 23.0% (n = 30). BAV repair stabilizing both the annulus and STJ with annuloplasty, compared with nonstabilized STJ repair (single annuloplasty), had lower incidence of reoperation (2.6% vs 22.5%, P = .0018) and AI grade >2 (1.2% vs 23.6%, P < .001) at 9 years. Initial commissural angle <160° was not a risk factor for reoperation, compared with angle ≥160° if symmetrical repair was achieved (2.7% and 4.1%, respectively, at 6 years, P = .85). Multivariable model showed that absence of STJ stabilization (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-20, P = .001) increased recurrent AI, but not initial commissural angle <160° (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-2.63, P = .98). Commissures adjusted symmetrically led to lower transvalvular gradient, compared with nonsymmetrical repair (8.7 mm Hg vs 10.2 mm Hg, P = .029). ConclusionsBAV repair, tailored to aorta phenotype, is associated with excellent durable outcomes if both annulus and STJ are reduced and stabilized with external ring annuloplasty. Commissural angle <160° is not associated with reoperation if symmetrical repair is achieved.

Eligibility assessment for aortic valve repair in adults congenital patients

Aortic valve (AV) pathology in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients has its own etiologies: bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), conotruncal anomalies, Laubry-Pezzi syndrome, subvalvular aortic membrane, genetic disorders or postoperative lesions (Ross procedure or previous AV repair). Following the example of mitral plasty in the 1980s, surgical techniques for AV repair have been standardized since the 2000s and show very good results in selected patients, allowing a substantial reduction in the risk of prosthesis-related complications. To present an accurate and reproducible transthoracic and transesophageal echo protocol analysing aorta phenotypes and AV and predict the immediate success of AV repair in ACHD patients. The study involved a retrospective analysis of all the ACHD patients operated between January 2018 and May 2022 for AV surgery at the Georges Pompidou European Hospital in Paris. Clinical characteristics, type of ACHD, severity and type of valve involvement (insufficiency, stenosis, or dilatation of the aortic root) were collected. Preoperative and postoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echography were performed using a unique protocol with a 3D approach. Preoperatively, the AV dysfunction, its lesion at the origin and its etiology were defined. Measurements of aortic annulus, effective heights, geometric heights, commissural angle if BAV were made, and the presence of fenestrations, calcifications were noted. In case of AV repair, all measurements were repeated postoperatively. The surgical techniques of aortic plasty were noted. Sixty-three patients were analyzed, 46% of whom were referred for AV repair. Fifty percent of them had BAV, 30% of them were redux of AV repair (20%) or Ross procedure (10%), 20% had conotruncal anomalies. Aortic plasty was performed in 33% of patients, including external ring annuloplasty in case of AV regurgitation with an annulus diameter ≥ 25 mm. We analyzed which patients have the best chance to be reparable. ACHD patients are challenging patients for AV repair. A standardized echo protocol helps to predict the reparability, in order to know if the cardiologist should address his patient in expert surgeons’ hands.

Reimplantation versus aortic ring annuloplasty in bicuspid valve with borderline aortic root ectasia.

ObjectiveBicuspid aortic valve repair can be achieved with the reimplantation technique or external ring annuloplasty. Reimplantation could be an “overtreatment” in nonaneurysmatic aortic roots. External ring repair, on the contrary, could be an “undertreatment” in dilated roots. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the 2 techniques in patients with borderline aortic root dimensions, analyzing early results, aortic regurgitation recurrence, and root dilation over time.MethodsWe selected patients with bicuspid aortic valve and ectasia of the aortic root (40-48 mm) who underwent reimplantation or external ring repair. We compared the 2 techniques, analyzing immediate postoperative and follow-up echocardiography. Only patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were included.ResultsWe obtained 2 groups of 21 patients (reimplantation) and 22 patients (external ring). Median follow-up time was 36 (40) months. There were no deaths during the follow-up periods. Three patients required reoperation in the external ring group because of recurrent aortic regurgitation, with a freedom from reoperation of 77.8% at 7 years (no reoperation was required in the reimplantation group). In the external ring group, we observed an immediate postoperative root diameter reduction and no significative expansion during follow-up (+0.4 mm/year, P = .184).ConclusionsExcellent results of reimplantation technique are confirmed and stable over time. Root diameter seems to remain stable over time when external ring technique was performed. The greater incidence of reoperation after external ring could be due to the progressive learning curve (256 patients vs 52 patients). Longer follow-up studies are needed.

Aortic valve repair using pericardial patch standardized with external ring annuloplasty.

This study was undertaken to analyse outcomes of aortic valve repair using additional material and compare the results to those of cusp repair without the use of the pericardial patch. All consecutive patients aged over 16 who underwent aortic valve repair with external ring annuloplasty for isolated aortic insufficiency, aortic insufficiency and tubular aortic aneurysm or aortic root aneurysm between May 2003 and November 2019 were included in a cohort study. Data were collected and analysed from the AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry). Propensity score framework analysis (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to compare outcomes of the groups while controlling for confounders. During the 16-year study period, 618 patients underwent aortic valve repair. Eight-year survival rate was 92% in the patch group and 90.2% in the no patch group without significant differences [P = 0.957 inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) weighted]. Early valve-related reoperation was more frequent in the patch group as compared to the no patch group (6% vs 1%, P < 0.001 IPTW weighted), the freedom from aortic valve-related reintervention and from structural valve deterioration at 8 years was not significantly different between the patch and no patch groups (93.7% vs 94%, P = 0.968 IPTW weighted; and 99.3% vs 96.7%, P = 0.964 IPTW weighted). Although a higher rate of early reintervention was observed, aortic valve repair using the pericardial patch, in a standardized approach using external annuloplasty, with effective coaptation height of at least 9 mm, was not associated with an increase in mid-term aortic valve-related reoperation or structural valve deterioration as compared to valve repair without the pericardial patch.

Root Reimplantation and Aortic Annuloplasty With External Ring in Bicuspid Aortic Valve: An Anatomical Comparison

Aortic annuloplasty has demonstrated to be a protective factor in valve-sparing root replacement and aortic valve repair. Both reimplantation for aortic root aneurysms and external ring annuloplasty for isolated aortic regurgitation have demonstrated good long-term results. The aim of this anatomical study is to compare aortic reimplantation with Valsalva graft with aortic external ring annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valves, analyzing their morphological features with CT scan. We selected 56 patients with bicuspid aortic valve who underwent reimplantation procedure with Valsalva graft or external ring annuloplasty; after propensity-matching, 2 homogeneous groups of 10 patients each were obtained. Through multiplanar ECG-gated CT-Scan reconstructions, pre- and postoperative, aortic annular, and valve geometrical characteristics were compared (diameters, perimeter, area and ellipticity index for the annulus; effective height, coaptation length and commissural height for the valve). Aortic root volume was also analyzed. Postoperative comparison of the two groups showed similar geometric features of the aortic annulus in terms of major and minor diameters, perimeter, area and ellipticity index. Analysis of valve's parameters showed similar results in terms of effective height and coaptation length (respectively 10.9 ± 2.1 mm and 7.5 ± 1.9 mm in External Ring group and 10.1 ± 2.0 mm and 7.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Reimplantation group). Both techniques achieve an efficient annuloplasty with similar anatomical results on bicuspid the aortic valves. The stability of these results needs to be confirmed by long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.

Standardization of bicuspid valve repair with aortic annuloplasty provides similar results to tricuspid aortic valve repair

Abstract Background Bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) represent the main cause of severe dystrophic aortic insufficiency in young patients and are mostly replaced with high rates of valve-related events and altered quality of life in case of mechanical prosthesis. Valve repair is now recommended for root aneurysm and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) when feasible. However, concerns remain regarding the long-term durability of BAV repair, compared to TAV. Purpose Our objective is to compare the long-term results of repair between TAV and BAV, in consecutive patients operated on with a standardized approach according to each phenotype of the dystrophic ascending aorta. Methods Data were prospectively collected into the multicenter international AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry). Between 2003 and 2019, according to ascending aorta phenotypes, 226 patients with BAV and 309 patients with TAV underwent either isolated valve repair with external ring annuloplasty (26,2%), or root remodeling with external ring (59,4%), or a supra-coronary graft with external ring (14,4%). Results Cusp repair was performed in 95,1% patients in the BAV group and in 63,8% in the TAV group. The 30-day operative mortality was 0,93% (n=5). Mean follow-up was 5,5±4,4 years. The actuarial survival rate at 12 years was 93,2% in the BAV group and 87,8% in the TAV group (p=0,14). Freedom from reoperation at 12 years was similar between groups being 94,9% for bicuspid and 93,2% for tricuspid (p=0,75). Freedom from major adverse valve-related events at 12 years was 82,8% and 82,9% in BAV and TAV groups respectively (p=0,17). At 12 years, freedom from AI ≥Grade 2 or ≥Grade 3 was 68,7% and 94,3% for BAV and 76,5% and 94,7% for TAV group, with no significant difference (respectively p=0,16 and p=0,92). Conclusion Aortic valve repair with a standardized approach adapted to the aorta phenotype provides excellent long-term results with a low rate of valve-related events. Similar results were achieved between BAV and TAV patients. freedom from reoperation for BAV and TAV Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Early exercise training feasibility after aortic valve repair: A multicentre prospective French survey on behalf of the Aortic Valve repair International Registry (AVIATOR)

Standardization of aortic valve repair by the external ring annuloplasty approach is an alternative to valve replacement to avoid prosthetic valve-related events. Although the benefit of exercise training to improve postoperative exercise tolerance has been demonstrated in many conditions after cardiac surgery, it has never been described after aortic valve repair. To evaluate the feasibility of an early exercise training programme after aortic valve repair. Consecutive patients were prospectively included in 13 postoperative centres. Patients underwent an exercise training programme for approximately 3-5 weeks. Transthoracic echocardiography and a cardiopulmonary exercise test were performed before and after the exercise training programme. Fifty patients (mean±standard deviation [SD] age: 50±13 years) were included a mean of 13.6±12.0 days after aortic valve repair. The preoperative degree of aortic insufficiency was moderate to severe in 35 patients (70%) and the aortic valve was bicuspid in 24 patients (48%). Valve-sparing root replacement and isolated aortic valve repair (including 10% supracoronary aorta replacement) were performed in 64% and 36% of patients, respectively. We found no aortic insufficiency occurrence or worsening and no adverse clinical events after the exercise training programme. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly (from 54%±8% to 57%±9%; P=0.0007). Mean peak oxygen consumption and first ventilatory threshold increased from 17.0±5.3 to 22.5±7.8mL/kg/min (32% increase) and from 12.0±3.9 to 14.3±5.2mL/kg/min (19% increase), respectively (both P<0.05). Exercise training early after aortic valve repair is safe and seems to significantly improve exercise capacity.

Bicuspid aortic valve repair with hemi-remodeling technique and external ring annuloplasty.

Current guidelines recommend root replacement when diameter of the sinuses of Valsalva are superior to 45 mm particularly for bicuspid valve. However, in case of tubular aorta aneurysms with moderate root dilatation (40-45 mm diameter), the approach is still debated regarding the increased risk of coronary reimplantation. We present a modified hemi-remodeling aortic repair technique that includes the replacement of the noncoronary sinus, ascending aorta, and valve repair with external ring annuloplasty in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and moderately dilated aortic root. Between 2003 and 2017, 18 patients presenting with left-right BAV and an aortic root diameter at 42.3+/-3.3 mm underwent hemi-root and ascending aorta replacement and aortic valve repair with external annuloplasty. Postoperatively, 16 (88.9%) had no aortic insufficiency (AI) and 2 (11.1%) had grade I AI, no patients had grade III or grade IV AI. Overall survival and freedom from grade II AI at 4 years and freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation were 100%. The standardized modified hemi-remodeling technique we present is a safe and reproducible procedure, with satisfactory durability at follow-up. This technique represents an interesting alternative to full valve sparing root replacement, as it avoids the operative risk of coronary reimplantation, allows shorter cross-clamping time and a better exposition on the valve for a symmetrical repair, placing the commissure at 180°, compared with valve sparing root replacement.

Aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection.

To investigate the early and mid-term results of aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection. From January 2015 to April 2019, a total of 194 patients underwent emergency or urgent operation for acute type A aortic dissection in our hospital. Of these, outcomes in 18 patients who underwent valve-sparing aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the 18 patients was 49 ± 14 years. Fourteen patients (78%) were men. Five patients had Marfan syndrome and 2 patients had bicuspid aortic valve. Two patients had coronary malperfusion and 1 patient had cerebral malperfusion. All 18 patients underwent aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty. Cusp repair using central cusp plication was required in 9 patients. Concomitant procedures were hemiarch replacement in 8 patients, total arch replacement in 7 patients, partial arch replacement in 1 patient and coronary artery bypass grafting to the right coronary artery in 3 patients. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% (1 of 18). Postoperative echocardiography showed aortic regurgitation of <1+ in all patients. During follow-up (mean 56 ± 41 months), 1 case of recurrent aortic regurgitation required aortic valve replacement. Aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty may be an appropriate treatment in middle-aged or younger patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection.

Isolated aortic insufficiency valve repair with external ring annuloplasty: a standardized approach.

Aortic valve (AV) insufficiency with normal root and ascending aorta is most frequently treated by valve replacement with significant prosthetic-related complications and reduced life expectancy. We compared the outcomes of a new standardized isolated AV repair approach using an external aortic annuloplasty ring at the subvalvular level (single ring annuloplasty) and the role of an additional supravalvular ring at the sinotubular junction (double ring annuloplasty). Single centre data were collected from the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry (AVIATOR) between 2003 and 2017. A total of 93 patients (56 single ring and 37 double ring) underwent isolated AV repair. The overall 30-day mortality rate and the need for a permanent pacemaker were 1% and 2%, respectively. The overall survival rate at 6 years was similar for sex- and age-matched members of the general population (89% vs 95%; P = 0.1) and did not differ between the double and single ring groups (82% vs 93%; P = 0.4) at 6 years. There were no thromboembolic or bleeding events in the entire cohort. However, at 6 years, the cumulative incidence of valve-related reintervention was 26% in the single ring annuloplasty group compared to 3% in the double ring annuloplasty (P = 0.02) group. Similarly, at 6 years, the cumulative incidence of moderate-to-severe (>2) aortic insufficiency was 30% in the single ring annuloplasty group compared to 0% in the double ring annuloplasty group (P = 0.007). Standardized AV repair with external ring annuloplasty has a survival rate similar to that of the general population. The additional stabilization of the sinotubular junction with a second supravalvular ring (double ring annuloplasty) is associated with better outcomes compared to single subvalvular annuloplasty. It can be considered as a first line intervention for patients with isolated aortic insufficiency and pliable leaflets.

Minimally invasive bicuspid aortic valve repair with external ring annuloplasty

Minimally invasive bicuspid aortic valve repair with external ring annuloplasty

Long-term Outcomes After Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair With an External Aortic Ring Annuloplasty

Long-term Outcomes After Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair With an External Aortic Ring Annuloplasty

Aortic root remodeling with external aortic ring annuloplasty

An efficacy and safety of valve-sparing aortic root surgery with aortic ring annuloplasty have been demonstrated in various trials. The main technical features of aortic root remodeling with external aortic ring annuloplasty are reported in the article.

Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty.

The current guidelines for surgical intervention of aortic regurgitation were developed by assuming aortic valve replacement. However, when aortic valve repair is considered, earlier intervention may provide more durable repair. Standardization of the procedures may be required to achieve stable outcomes. The possibility of standardization of valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) and annuloplasty will be discussed. The differences between the two VSRRs have decreased with technical modifications, reimplantation using a graft with sinuses, and remodeling with annuloplasty. The minor differences are the maintenance of root distensibility, less root dissection, shorter procedure time, and higher risk of bleeding in the latter. Stable outcomes may be expected by choosing the appropriate graft size according to the root dimensions in the former. In the latter, postoperative commissure height depends on the skill of the surgeon, which can be resolved using a graft with sinuses. There is still controversy regarding the equal arrangement of the commissure heights and angle, but it has been accepted in clinical use provided that postoperative effective heights of each cusp are set equally. External suture annuloplasty maintains the advantages of remodeling because it requires less root dissection and a shorter procedure time. It can accurately predict postoperative annulus diameter. External ring annuloplasty can stabilize the basal ring exactly, but it is time-consuming and postoperative annulus diameter cannot be predicted accurately. Standardization of VSRR may be feasible, and VSRR is expected to be more widely adopted, which will improve the guidelines.

Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty

ObjectiveAlthough the remodeling technique provides the most dynamic valve-sparing root replacement, a dilated annulus (>25 mm) is a risk factor for failure. Aortic annuloplasty aims to reduce the annulus diameter, thus increasing coaptation height to protect the repair. The results of 177 patients with remodeling and external aortic ring annuloplasty were studied. MethodsData were collected from the Aortic Valve repair InternATiOnal Registry. Preoperative aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater was present in 79 patients (44.7%). The valve was bicuspid in 59 patients (33.3%). External annuloplasty was performed through a homemade Dacron ring (56) or a dedicated expansible aortic ring (121). ResultsThirty-day mortality was 2.9% (5). Mean follow-up was 41.1 ± 36.4 months. For the whole series, freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events were 89.5%, 90.5%, 77.4%, and 86.6% at 7 years, respectively, with similar results for tricuspid and bicuspid valves. Since 2007, systematic use of calibrated expansible ring annuloplasty, followed 1 year later by systematic cusp effective height assessment, significantly increased 7-year freedom from valve-related reoperation, aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater, and major adverse valve-related events up to 99.1% ± 0.9% (P = .017), 100% (P = .026), and 96.3% ± 1.8% (P = .035), respectively, whereas freedom from aortic insufficiency grade 2 or greater remained unaffected (78.1% ± 7.6%). Calibrated annuloplasty and effective height assessment were identified as protective factors from reoperation: hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.06; P = .057 and hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.95; P = .044, respectively. ConclusionsThe standardization of remodeling root repair with calibrated expansible aortic ring annuloplasty and cusp effective height assessment improves valve repair outcomes.

Valve-Sparing Root Replacement: Aortic Root Remodeling with External Subvalvular Ring Annuloplasty.

The original valve-sparing procedures for aortic root aneurysms were remodeling and reimplantation of the aortic root. The remodeling technique provides more physiologic movement of the cusps within 3 reconstructed neo-sinuses, thus preserving root expansibility through the interleaflet triangles. However, the durability of remodeling has been a matter of concern due to the high rate of aortic insufficiency when annular dilation is not addressed. Therefore, a modified approach was developed, combining a physiologic remodeling of the root with a subvalvular annuloplasty. This case report highlights the first case of successful aortic root remodeling with external subvalvular ring annuloplasty in Korea.

Remodeling technique of valve sparing root replacement with external ring annuloplasty: initial results

Remodeling technique of valve sparing root replacement with external ring annuloplasty: initial results

Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.

An untreated dilated aortic annulus is a major risk factor for failure of aortic valve-sparing operations or repair of either bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Aortic annuloplasty efficiently reduces the annulus and increases the coaptation height, thus protecting the repair. This study analyses long-term results of 232 consecutive patients operated on with a standardized and physiological approach to aortic valve repair according to each phenotype of the dystrophic ascending aorta. Subvalvular aortic annuloplasty was systematically added using an external aortic ring to reduce annulus diameter when ≥25 mm. Data were collected into the multicentric international AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry): 149 patients with root aneurysm underwent remodelling with an external ring; 21 patients with tubular aortic aneurysm underwent supracoronary grafts with an external open ring and 62 patients with isolated aortic insufficiency (AI) underwent double sub- and/or supravalvular external open ring annuloplasty. Preoperative AI ≥ Grade III was present in 58.6% (133), and the valve was bicuspid in 37.9% (88). Cusp repair was performed in 75.4% (175) patients. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 1.4% (3). The mean follow-up was 40.1 ± 37.8 months (0-145.5). The actuarial survival rate at 7 years was 89.9%. The rate of freedom from reoperation at 7 years was similar among each phenotype, being 90.5% for root aneurysms, 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 97.5% for isolated AI with no difference between the bicuspid and tricuspid valve. The rates of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 2 and from AI ≥ Grade 3 at 7 years were, respectively, 76.0 and 93.1% for root aneurysms, 92.9 and 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 57.3 and 82.2% for isolated AI. Eye balling repair achieved suboptimal valve competency when compared with systematic cusp effective height assessment, which tended to improve the rate freedom from reoperation, respectively, from 85.8 ± 5.5% to 98.9 ± 1.1% and the rate of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 3 from 89.8 ± 4.9% to 100%. For isolated AI, an additional sinotubular junction ring (double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty) tended to reduce recurrent AI when compared with single subvalvular annuloplasty. External aortic ring annuloplasty provides a reproducible technique for aortic valve repair with satisfactory long-term results for each ascending aorta phenotype with bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Longer follow-up is ongoing with the AVIATOR registry.