External Quality Assurance Program Research Articles

Decreased variability in the site-specific results during participation in the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) proficiency program for IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISpot) assay

The NIAID DAIDS-sponsored External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) manages an interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) external proficiency program. The ELISpot program evaluates the accuracy and variability of results across laboratories. The variability in the program is quantified via the dispersion, which is the ratio of the variance over the mean of the background-corrected spot-forming cells (SFC) replicates obtained under stimulation with different peptide pools (CMV, CEF). This report includes the longitudinal analysis of the ELISpot program cohort composed of 22 laboratories from 2011 to 2022 to assess whether the within-lab variability has improved over time. Random intercept models of the dispersion over time showed a significant decrease in overall dispersion from an average of approximately 1.8 in 2011 to approximately 1.25 in 2022. Out of the 21 sites, 16 sites (4 being statistically significant) had a negative trend for dispersion over time. Our finding of a reduction of overall within-lab variability demonstrates the need for and benefit of proficiency testing programs.

A-316 A quantitative gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for metabolic profiling of urine organic acids and acylglycines

Abstract Background The analysis of urine organic acids (UOA) and acylglycines (UAG) are an essential investigation for the diagnosis inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). The vast majority of methods for these analytes use gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and are only qualitative. Gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) offers greater sensitivity and selectivity and enables the combination of qualitative screening with quantitative analysis. We describe the development and validation results of a quantitative GC-MS/MS method. Methods Urine creatinine concentrations were measured (CobasPro, Roche Diagnostics) and normalized to 1.25 mmol/L. After internal standard addition, each urine specimen, calibration standard and QC were incubated with a hydroxylamine solution followed by a liquid-liquid extraction. Further sample concentration permitted the isolated UOA and UAG to be derivatized using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamine (BSTFA) with 1% chlorotrimethylsilane (TMCS) prior to injection. GC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a GC-MS-TQ8050 triple quadrupole system (Shimadzu) with a 30 m DB-5MS (Agilent J&W) capillary column (0.25 mm, ID of 0.25 µm). Split injection mode was deployed with an initial column temperature of 70°C. The mass spectrometer was operated in electron ionization (EI) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. Results The optimal temperature gradient for high-resolution UOA and UAG separations was derived and their respective retention times determined. MS/MS detection parameters were optimized to permit the identification of precursor and production ions for all (N=36) derivatized analytes. Total analysis time was 33.8 min per injection. This method permits the measurement of 11 samples in one batch and is highly linear for all analytes (R^2 >0.99 and average slope 1.04). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was established and ranged from <0.05 to 2.1 µmol/mmol creatinine. Intra- and inter-day imprecision (CV%) was determined using matrix-matched abnormal and normal QC. Intra-day imprecision (N=10) ranged from 1.3% (2-ketoglutaric acid) to 9.7% (3-hydroxybutyric acid). Inter-day imprecision (N=30 over 15 days) ranged from 2.2% (ethylmalonic acid and methylmalonic acid) to 20.5% (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acid). The method had an average accuracy of 113±14% for analytes included in the ERNDiM quantitative organic acids (urine) external quality assurance program. For analytes not included in this proficiency testing, the method showed good agreement when compared to a national reference laboratory, with average Deming correlation coefficients and regression slopes being 0.9944 and 1.1, respectively. No interferences were detected when monitoring the analyte quantifier and qualifier ion ratios in patient urine. Conclusions The devised GC-MS/MS protocol permits the unbiased identification and quantification of UOA and UAG used to investigate IEMs. The method has acceptable sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy for clinical routine clinical testing.

B-335 Analytical Performance of the Novel EQA Material for Fecal Immunochemical Test for Hemoglobin

Abstract Background EQA (external quality assurance) program for FIT (fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin) is performed in many countries, and its demand increases as FIT is widely used in organized colorectal cancer screening programs. The materials used in FIT EQA vary from buffer-based liquid control, and lyophilized stool, to material that mimics stool, artificial stool. We could not find ideal EQA material with hemoglobin uniformly contained, good stability of hemoglobin, and ease in use such as ready-to-use form. The merit to use material that simulates actual sample, stool, is not only to be compliant with ISO15189 but also to suit various methods and sampling devices in FIT. The development of artificial stool material has been awaited by laboratories using FIT to evaluate errors and precisions in specimen collection.We assessed the analytical performance of the new artificial stool developed in HECTEF (Health Care Technology Foundation) to evaluate this artificial stool material was suitable as an EQA material. We examined the following three points: 1) Sample collection, 2) Uniformity, and 3) Stability of hemoglobin. Methods 1) Sample collection: The material was collected with the sampling probes of OC-Auto Sampling Bottle 3 (Eiken Chemical) and the collection amount was calculated by comparing the weight before and after sampling the artificial stool. 2) Uniformity: The uniformity of hemoglobin was evaluated during production before and after bottling based on “Uniformity of dosage units” section of The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 18th edition, 2021. The material was sampled from 10 different points and hemoglobin concentrations were measured using OC-Sensor DIANA. The uniformity of hemoglobin between the vials was evaluated by calculating the CV from the average of hemoglobin concentrations from samples of three points from three vials. 3) Stability of hemoglobin: The materials stored under different temperature conditions were compared with the material stored frozen at -20 °C. Storage conditions were at refrigeration for 20 months, at 30 °C for 1 month, and freeze-thawing for five times. Evaporation from the material was evaluated by weighing the samples before and after storage at 30 °C for 1 month. Results 1) Sample collection: The material was collected with sampling probes and the collection amounts were 106% (compared to theoretical amount).2) Uniformity: Uniformity of hemoglobin during production was within the specification of “Uniformity of dosage units” section of the pharmacopoeias, acceptance value<15.0. Uniformity of hemoglobin among three vials was within ±10% CV.3) Stability of hemoglobin: Stabilities of the material were all within ±10% from the control material (frozen) after storage at all temperature conditions. Evaporation from the material in a vial was below 1% at 30 °C storage for 1 month. Conclusions This artificial stool is suitable for EQA material because it is confirmed that it shows favorable analytical results in sample collection, uniformity, and stability of hemoglobin. The evaluation of this material in the EQA program to show its suitability was performed by Labquality. The result is reported in a poster at ADLM 2024.

The Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network Supports High-Quality Surveillance.

With 762 laboratories, the Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) is the largest laboratory network coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Like the Global Polio Laboratory Network, the GMRLN has multiple tiers, including global specialized laboratories, regional reference laboratories, national laboratories, and, in some countries, subnational laboratories. Regional networks are supervised by regional laboratory coordinators reporting to a global coordinator at WHO headquarters. Laboratories in the GMRLN have strong links to national disease control and vaccination programs. The GMRLN's goal is to support member states in obtaining timely, complete, and reliable laboratory-based surveillance data for measles and rubella as part of the strategy for achieving measles and rubella elimination. Surveillance data are reported to the national program and are included in annual reports on the status of measles and rubella elimination to national verification committees for review by regional verification commissions. Quality within the GMRLN is ensured by monitoring performance through external quality assurance programs, confirmatory and quality control testing, accreditation, and coordination of corrective action and training where needed. The overall performance of the laboratories has remained high over the years despite many challenges, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic. The GMRLN is well-positioned to support high-quality laboratory-based surveillance for measles and rubella and to transition to supporting laboratory testing for other pathogens, including vaccine-preventable diseases.

External quality assurance experience with Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Program at an academic hospital in South Africa.

Laboratories use their performance in external quality assurance (EQA) to establish quality planning strategies and to assess whether testing processes require improvement. The EQA performance of the hematology and coagulation test parameters on the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia EQA program was evaluated over a 4-year cycle at an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. The test performance was determined from analytical quality specification (APS) and/or z-scores. Bias and imprecision were used to calculate sigma (σ) metric scores. Specifications from European Federation of Laboratory Medicine and/or biological variation were applied. The laboratory achieved a mean testing score of 98.7±4.0%. There were 103 (10.7%) unacceptable results. On investigation, root causes included: presurvey issues (83%), transcription errors (9%), random errors (6%), and test performance errors (3%). All test parameters evaluated achieved an acceptable median APS during the study period. The mean z-scores, however, were >2 and unacceptable for mean cell hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit. On investigation, this was attributed to significant delay in transport and storage of full blood count samples. White cell count and d-dimer achieved a σ ≥ 6. EQA participation assisted the laboratory in maintaining a quality system. Close monitoring is necessary for international laboratories to avoid sample delays that can affect result quality.

Building Quality Control for Molecular Assays in the Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network.

More than 100 laboratories in the World Health Organization Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) perform nucleic acid-based methods for case confirmation of measles or rubella infections and/or strain surveillance (genotyping). The quality of laboratory data is critical to ensure that diagnostic results and country reports to regional verification committees are based on accurate data. A molecular External Quality Assurance (mEQA) program was initiated by the US-CDC in 2014 to evaluate the performance of laboratories in the network. The inclusion of testing for measles and rubella viruses, with a focus on detection and genotyping, plus the diversity of assays and platforms employed required a flexible and comprehensive proficiency testing program. A stepwise introduction of new evaluation criteria gradually increased the stringency of the proficiency testing program, while giving laboratories time to implement the required changes. The mEQA program plays an important role in many processes in the GMRLN, including informing plans for the training of laboratory staff, access to reagents, and the submission of sequence data to global databases. The EQA program for Local Public Health Institutes in Japan is described as an example for national mEQA programs. As more laboratories initiate molecular testing, the mEQA will need to continue to expand and to adapt to the changing landscape for molecular testing.

Sigma metrics – a good quality control guide to assess analytical performance of a clinical chemistry laboratory

Background: Clinical laboratories function to deliver accurate, reliable, and timely reported results which are used in decision-making, diagnosis, and monitoring. Sigma metrics help to assess analytic methodologies and provide benchmarks for laboratories to design protocols for internal quality control (IQC), address poor assay performance, and assess the efficiency of existing laboratory processes. Thus, this study was undertaken to estimate the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias%, and total allowable error (TEa) of quality control (QC) samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act (CLIA) guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to estimate the CV%, Bias%, TEa of QC samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using CLIA guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Central Biochemistry Lab, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar. IQC data level 1 of 15 analytes was analyzed using EM200 for 3 months. CV% is calculated from internal quality data, whereas bias% is obtained from an external quality assurance program. Sigma metrics were calculated using bias% and CV%. TEa was calculated and compared with CLIA guidelines. Results: We have < 3 sigma values (unstable, unacceptable) for urea, creatinine, BID, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), protein, cholesterol, calcium, 3–6 (ideal) for glucose, uric acid, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, high-density lipoprotein, and >6 (excellent) for triglycerides. TEa observed less than or close to CLIA suggests quality requirement met, and TEa observed more than CLIA (urea, creatinine, BID, SGPT, protein, and calcium) suggests methodologies need evaluation. Conclusion: Sigma metrics help to assess analytical methodologies and augment laboratory performance. Each and every laboratory can use sigma metrics as a guideline for QC strategy and a self-assessment tool for proper functioning.

DS04 A transcontinental qualitative comparison study of two Mohs external quality assurance programmes

DS04 A transcontinental qualitative comparison study of two Mohs external quality assurance programmes

The development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for SARS-CoV-2 using dried tube specimens in resource-limited countries

IntroductionWhen COVID-19 hit the world in 2019, an enhanced focus on diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 was essential for a successful pandemic response. Testing laboratories stretched their capabilities for the new coronavirus by adopting different test methods. The necessity of having external quality assurance (EQA) mechanisms was even more critical due to this rapid expansion. However, there was a lack of experience in providing the necessary SARS-CoV-2 EQA materials, especially in locations with constrained resources.ObjectiveWe aimed to create a PT (Proficiency testing) programme based on the Dried Tube Specimens (DTS) method that would be a practical option for molecular based SARS-CoV-2 EQA in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.MethodsBased on previous ISO/IEC 17043:2010 accreditation experiences and with assistance from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The Supranational Reference Laboratory of Uganda (adapted the DTS sample preparation method and completed a pilot EQA program between 2020 and 2021. Stability and panel validation testing was conducted on the designed materials before shipping to pilot participants in six African countries. Participants received a panel containing five SARS-CoV-2 DTS samples, transported at ambient conditions. Results submitted by participants were compared to validation results. Participants were graded as satisfactory (≥ 80%) or unsatisfactory (< 80%) and performance reports disseminated.ResultsOur SARS-CoV-2 stability experiments showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was stable (-15 to -25 °C, 4 to 8 °C, (18 to 28 °C) room temperature and 35 to 38 °C) as well as DTS panels (4 to 8 °C, 18 to 28 °C, 35 to 38 °C and 45 °C) for a period of 4 weeks. The SARS-CoV-2 DTS panels were successfully piloted in 35 test sites from Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Seychelles. The pilot results of the participants showed good accuracy, with an average of 86% (30/35) concordance with the original SARS CoV-2 expectations.ConclusionThe SARS-CoV-2 DTS PT panel is reliable, stable at ambient temperature, simple to prepare and requires minimal resources.

Development and Validation of a HER2-Low Focused Immunohistochemical Scoring System With High-Interobserver Concordance: The Australian HER2-Low Breast Cancer Concordance Study

The DESTINY Breast-04 trial revealed survival advantages of trastuzumab deruxtecan for women with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (1+ or 2+ immunohistochemistry [IHC], without amplification). Although this trial applied the 2018 Americal Society of Clinial Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 IHC scoring criteria, the subjectivity and imprecision in IHC scoring have raised concerns that patients’ treatment may be misaligned. Our group of 9 experienced breast pathologists collated a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories, evaluated with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay and mostly scored locally as HER2 0 or 1+. Based on ASCO/CAP 2018 criteria and our extensive experience of reporting HER2 IHC, we specified scoring conventions for cancers with low levels of HER2 protein expression, articulating specific scoring pitfalls. Each pathologist then reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored the HER2 expression for each case. At a subsequent consensus workshop, we reviewed the cases jointly to establish consensus scores for each case and determine the percentage of HER2 expressing tumor cells. Consensus was reached on all cases, with 40 classified as 1+ and 3 as 2+ (not amplified), totaling 43 (71.7%) HER2-low cancers. The remaining cases were HER2 0. In 93.3% of cases (56/60), the consensus score matched with the majority opinion of pathologists’ independent scores. Seven (41.2%) of the 17 cases reported locally as HER2 0 were classified as HER2 low. Conversely, among 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. Individual pathologists’ accuracy in matching the consensus scores ranged from 73.3% to 91.67% (mean, 80.74%). Among HER2-low cancers those in which <20% of the tumor cells expressed HER2 had the lowest concordance levels. Observers Cohen’s κ coefficients for concordance were excellent for 4, good in 1, and moderate in the 4 observers. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores will be invaluable for peer training and development of our national external quality assurance program for HER2-low cancers. For assessing breast cancers at the low end of HER2 protein expression, our targeted scoring criteria and explicit instruction on pitfalls improved pathologists’ accuracy and concordance.

Sources of variability in Luminex bead-based cytokine assays: Evidence from twelve years of multi-site proficiency testing

Bead array assays, such as those sold by Luminex, BD Biosciences, Sartorius, Abcam and other companies, are a well-established platform for multiplexed quantification of cytokines and other biomarkers in both clinical and discovery research environments. In 2011, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-funded External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) established a proficiency assessment program to monitor participating laboratories performing multiplex cytokine measurements using Luminex bead array technology. During every assessment cycle, each site was sent an assay kit, a protocol, and blinded samples of human sera spiked with recombinant cytokines. Site results were then evaluated for performance relative to peer laboratories. After over a decade of biannual assessments, the cumulative dataset contained over 15,500 bead array observations collected at more than forty laboratories in twelve countries. These data were evaluated alongside post-assessment survey results to empirically test factors that may contribute to variability and accuracy in Luminex bead-based cytokine assays. Bead material, individual technical ability, analyte, analyte concentration, and assay kit vendor were identified as significant contributors to assay performance. In contrast, the bead reader instrument model and the use of automated plate washers were found not to contribute to variability or accuracy, and sample results were found to be highly-consistent between assay kit-manufacturing lots and over time. In addition to these statistical analyses, subjective evaluations identified technical ability, instrument failure, protocol adherence, and data transcription errors as the most common causes of poor performance in the proficiency program. The findings from the EQAPOL multiplex program were then used to develop recommended best practices for bead array monitoring of human cytokines. These included collecting samples to assay as a single batch, centralizing analysis, participating in a quality assurance program, and testing samples using paramagnetic-bead kits from a single manufacturer using a standardized protocol.

Abstract PO4-25-12: Improving HER2 Low Scoring Consistency and Accuracy: Insights from the Australian HER2 Low Concordance Study for Invasive Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction: The Destiny Breast-04 Trial (DB-04) demonstrated the survival benefits of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) for women with metastatic HER2 Low breast cancer, characterised by 1+ or 2+ IHC staining without amplification. While the DB-04 study applied the standard 2018 ASCO CAP IHC scoring criteria, in clinical practice, distinguishing HER2 0 from 1+ cancers is challenging as i) HER2 Low is not a biologically distinct subset of breast cancer, ii) there are no reference standards for HER2 Low cancers, iii) second-tier test, like ISH, are not applicable, and iv) there are no known controls for cases that have 0 or 1+ HER2 scores. For two decades this distinction was clinically immaterial, but now differentiating between HER2 0 and 1+ has now become crucial for determining patient eligibility for T-DXd therapy. Concerns regarding the subjectivity, imprecision and poor concordance between pathologists in scoring IHC in HER2 Low cancers raise the potential for misalignments in patient treatment. Ensuring pathologists have access to focused training for interpreting IHC scores at the low end of the HER2 expression spectrum, quality assurance procedures and reference sets are essential steps to help pathologists assess HER2 Low breast cancers more accurately and consistently. Design: In this study, a group of 9 experienced breast pathologists compiled a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories. The Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay had been used for evaluation and the local laboratories had scored the samples as HER2 0 or 1+. We teased out the ASCO CAP 2018 criteria and used our collective expertise of reporting HER2 IHC for many years to specify HER2 Low-focused scoring conventions, including some potential pitfalls. Subsequently, using these conventions, each pathologist reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored HER2 expression for each case. At a consensus workshop, the cases were jointly reviewed to establish consensus scores and determine the percentage of HER2-expressing tumor cells in each case. We then evaluated the concordance between individual pathologists' HER2 scores and the consensus opinion and ascertained reasons for discordance. Results: Among the cases discussed during the consensus conference, 43 out of 60 (71.7%) were classified as HER2 Low, with 40 cases designated as 1+ and three as 2+ (known to be not amplified). The consensus score matched the majority opinion of the pathologists' independent scores in 93.3% (56 out of 60) of the cases. Utilizing the HER2 Low-focused IHC scoring conventions, 7 out of 17 (41.2%) cases locally reported as HER2 0 were reclassified as HER2 Low. Conversely, among the 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. When compared to the consensus score, individual pathologists' scores demonstrated concordance levels ranging from 71.7% to 91.7%, with a mean concordance rate of 81.3%. Cases with less than 20% of tumor cells expressing HER2 had lower inter observer concordance. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores obtained through our study will be invaluable for peer training and the development of external quality assurance programs for HER2 Low cancers, including the quality assurance program of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Conclusion: This study revealed that when breast pathologists were provided explicit instructions on scoring pitfalls and HER2 Low-focused scoring conventions, their HER2 scores were concordant with expert consensus scores in 71.7% to 91.7% of cases. Discordant cases primarily involved cases with less than 20% of tumor cells expressing HER2. Utilising such an approach, peer training and quality assurance procedures will improve the accuracy and consistency of HER2 IHC assessment for better patient care. Reassessing older cases using HER2 Low focused scoring conventions may result in revisions of HER2 scores from HER2 Low to zero, and vice versa. Table. Individual pathologists' concordance with the consensus HER2 IHC score Applying our HER2 Low-focused IHC scoring conventions in a set of 60 core biopsies of invasive breast cancer with low or 0 HER2 protein expression. Citation Format: Gelareh Farshid, Beena Kumar, Nirmala Pathmanathan, Hema Mahajan, Ben Dessauvagie, Jane Armes, Cameron Snell, Amardeep Gilhotra. Improving HER2 Low Scoring Consistency and Accuracy: Insights from the Australian HER2 Low Concordance Study for Invasive Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-25-12.

Analysis of immunogenetics interlaboratory comparisons' success rates. External quality assurance system of the Spanish Society for Immunology GECLID-SEI.

For many years, transplantation outcomes were uncertain and not hopeful, until histocompatibility testing spread. Common criteria for histocompatibility assays and communications' improvement allowed an efficient organ sharing system. The possibility of organ exchanges is closely linked to the importance of interlaboratory comparisons for histocompatibility and immunogenetics methods. The external proficiency testing (EPT) systems are the most powerful quality assurance tools. They help achieve harmonization of analyses, set a standard of performance, and a common interpretation. The external quality assurance program for diagnostic immunology laboratories (Garantía Externa de Calidad para Laboratorios de Inmunología Diagnóstica, GECLID) program nowadays runs 13 external quality assurance (EQA) histocompatibility and immunogenetics schemes, with the first of them from 2011 to date: serological and molecular: low- and high-resolution human leukocyte antigen (HLA), human platelet antigen (HPA), and killer inhibitory receptor (KIR) typing(HLA-B*27, HLA-B*57:01, and coeliac disease-related HLA), cell-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and flow cytometry (FC) crossmatches, anti-HLA and anti-HPA antibodies, and chimerism. A total of 85 laboratories participated in this subprogram in the last 12years reporting over 1.69M results: 1.46M for anti-HLA and anti-HPA antibodies, 203.810 molecular typing data (HLA, HPA, and KIR genes), 2.372 for chimerism analyses, and 39.352 for crossmatches. Based on the European Federation for Immunogenetics (EFI) standards for EPT providers, the mean success rates ranged from 99.2% for molecular typing schemes and antibodies and 94.8% for chimerism, was 96.7% regarding crossmatches, and was 98.9% in serological typing. In 2022, 61.3% of the participating laboratories successfully passed every HLA EQA scheme, although 87.9% annual reports were satisfactory. Most penalties were due to nomenclature errors or misreporting of the risk associated to HLA and disease. This EQA confirms the reliability of HLA and immunogenetics assays in routine care. There is little heterogeneity of results of different assays used by participating laboratories, even when in-house assays are used. Reliability of test results is reasonably granted.

External quality assurance program for diagnostic complement laboratories: evaluation of the results of the past seven years.

The complement external quality assurance (EQA) program was first organized in 2010 by a group of researchers working in diagnostic complement laboratories. Starting in 2016, INSTAND e.V., a German, non-profit interdisciplinary scientific medical society dedicated to providing expert EQA programs for medical laboratories, started organizing the EQAs for complement diagnostic laboratories together with the same group of experienced scientists and doctors who also work as EQA experts. The aim of the current work is to provide descriptive analysis of the past seven years' complement EQA results and evaluate timeline changes in proficiency testing. Each year, in March and October, blinded samples (normal, pathological) were sent to the participating diagnostic laboratories, where complement parameters were evaluated exactly as in daily routine samples. Since no reference method/target values exist for these parameters, and participants used different units for measurement, the reported results were compared to the stable mean (Algorithm A) of the participants using the same method/measurement units. A reported result was qualified as "passed" if it fell into the 30-50% evaluation/target range around the mean of reported results (depending on the given parameter). While the number of participating laboratories has increased in the past years (from around 120 to 347), the number of complement laboratories providing multiple determinations remained mostly unchanged (around 30 worldwide). C3, C4, C1-inhibitor antigen and activity determinations provided the best proficiency results, with >90% passing quotas in the past years, independent of the applied method. Determination of the functional activity of the three activation pathways was good in general, but results showed large variance, especially with the pathological samples. Complement factor C1q and regulators FH and FI are determined by only a few laboratories, with variable outcomes (in general in the 85-90% pass range). Activation products sC5b-9 and Bb were determined in 30 and 10 laboratories, respectively, with typical passing quotas in the 70-90% range, without a clear tendency over the past years. With these accumulated data from the past seven years, it is now possible to assess sample-, method-, and evaluation related aspects tofurtherimprove proficiency testing and protocolize diagnostic complement determinations.

Sharing reference intervals and monitoring patients across laboratories- findings from a likely commutable external quality assurance program.

Laboratory results are increasingly interpreted against common reference intervals (CRIs), published clinical decision limits, or previous results for the same patient performed at different laboratories. However, there are no established systems to determine whether current analytical performance justifies these interpretations. We analysed data from a likely commutable external quality assurance program (EQA) to assess these interpretations. The use of CRIs was assessed by evaluating instrument group medians against minimum specifications for bias. The use of clinical decision limits was assessed using specifications from professional bodies, and the monitoring of patients by testing at different laboratories was assessed by comparing all-laboratory imprecision to within-subject biological variation. Five of the 18 analytes with Australasian CRIs did not meet specification for all instrument groups. Among these, calcium and magnesium failed for one instrument group out of seven, while bicarbonate, chloride, and lipase failed for two instrument groups. Of the 18 analytes reviewed currently without CRIs in Australasia, 10 candidates were identified. Among analytes with clinical decision limits, i.e.lipids, glucose, and vitamin D, only triglycerides met both bias and imprecision specifications, while vitamin D met the imprecision specification. Monitoring patients by testing at different laboratories was supported for 15 of the 46 (33 %) analyte-method principles groups that met minimum imprecision specifications. Analysis of data from commutable EQA programs can provide a mechanism for monitoring whether analyticalperformance justifies the interpretations made incontemporary laboratory practice. EQA providers shouldestablish systems for routinely providing this information to the laboratory community.

Lessons learned from an external quality assurance program in applying CLSI interpretive criteria for reporting piperacillin/tazobactam susceptibility

We evaluated the performance of automated susceptibility testing for piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) MICs against the reference microbroth dilution method. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of PTZ against a clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae was determined by reference broth micro-dilution method in 10 replicates which yielded a modal MIC of 16 mg/L (susceptible dose-dependent). Out of 434 laboratories who obtained MIC of 16 mg/L correctly, only 301 interpreted the result as susceptible dose dependent as per 2022 revised CLSI criteria. Educating the clinical laboratories in validating AST methods as per latest CLSI guidelines is of utmost important.

A phased strengthening of laboratory capacity in the Eastern Mediterranean Region during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) faces ongoing challenges in its public health system due to limited resources, logistical issues, and political disruptions. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for stronger laboratory capacities to handle the increased demand for testing. In a phased response, EMR countries utilized the National Influenza Centers to rapidly establish and scale molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. The expansion of capacity included strong collaborations between public health bodies and private and academic sectors to decentralize and expand testing to the subnational level. To ensure that the quality of testing was not impacted by rapid expansion, national and subnational laboratories were enrolled in external quality assurance programs for the duration of the response. Implementation of genomic surveillance was prioritized for variant tracking, leading to the establishment of regional sequencing reference laboratories and the distribution of MinION sequencing platforms to complex emergency countries who previously had limited experience with pathogen sequencing. Challenges included a lack of technical expertise, including in implementing novel diagnostic assays and sequencing, a lack of bioinformatics expertise in the region, and significant logistical and procurement challenges. The collaborative approach, coordinated through the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, enabled all 22 countries to achieve SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic capabilities, highlighting the pivotal role of laboratories in global health security.

Effect of the technical variability of counting chambers upon the interpretation of sperm concentration results

Research questionDoes the choice of sperm-counting chamber affect the proportion of samples generating results with an erroneous interpretation? DesignLaboratories in an external quality assurance programme were sent 141 semen samples over a 12-year period and asked to return the sperm concentration and whether or not the result was abnormal. Only those using 5th edition of the World Health Organization manual (WHO5) interpretation criteria were included. Submissions from specialist fertility laboratories were used to calculate assigned values for each sample. Laboratory50 values determined the sperm concentration at which the laboratories reported a majority transition from abnormal to normal interpretations, i.e. the tipping point, which should coincide with the lower reference limit. ResultsThe median and range of bias from the assigned values of each sample were determined for the Makler (–3.3%; –88.6% to +332.8%), haemocytometer (10.6%; –93.3% to +645.5%), Kova (+65.3%; –71.7% to +581.8%) and Vetriplast (+72.4%; –100.0% to +709.1) chambers. Laboratory50 values for the Makler (17.3 × 106/ml), haemocytometer (13.6 × 106/ml), Kova (10.0 × 106/ml) and Vetriplast chambers (8.8 × 106/ml) reflected the under- and overestimation of the chambers and confirmed a shift in the adjusted lower reference limit then used. The proportion of laboratories reporting erroneous interpretations of the four chambers for oligozoospermic samples were 10.9%, 15.1.%, 40.1% and 44.0%, respectively, and rose as the adjusted lower reference limit decreased. ConclusionsThe between-laboratory and within-sample variation for all the chambers was high and remains a concern. The main impact of an increasing bias of the chambers was a lowering of the laboratory50 tipping point, resulting in an under-reporting of abnormal semen samples.

Ensuring quality in 17OHP mass spectrometry measurement: an international study assessing isomeric steroid interference.

Interference from isomeric steroids is a potential cause of disparity between mass spectrometry-based 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) results. We aimed to assess the proficiency of mass spectrometry laboratories to report 17OHP in the presence of known isomeric steroids. A series of five samples were prepared using a previously demonstrated commutable approach. These samples included a control (spiked to 15.0 nmol/L 17OHP) and four challenge samples further enriched with equimolar concentrations of 17OHP isomers (11α-hydroxyprogesterone, 11β-hydroxyprogesterone, 16α-hydroxyprogesterone or 21-hydroxyprogesterone). These samples were distributed to 38 participating laboratories that reported serum 17OHP results using mass spectrometry in two external quality assurance programs. The result for each challenge sample was compared to the control sample submitted by each participant. Twenty-six laboratories (68 % of distribution) across three continents returned results. Twenty-five laboratories used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and one used gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure 17OHP. The all-method median of the control sample was 14.3 nmol/L, ranging from 12.4 to 17.6 nmol/L. One laboratory had results that approached the lower limit of tolerance (minus 17.7 % of the control sample), suggesting the isomeric steroid caused an irregular result. Most participating laboratories demonstrated their ability to reliably measure 17OHP in the presence of the four clinically relevant isomeric steroids. The performance of the 12 (32 %) laboratories that did not engage in this activity remains unclear. We recommend that all laboratories offering LC-MS/MS analysis of 17OHP in serum, plasma, or dried bloodspots determine that the isomeric steroids are appropriately separated.

Compliance to specifications in an external quality assurance program: did new biological variation estimates of the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) affect the quality of laboratory results?

The results of external quality assurance schemes are evaluated against specifications generally based on biological variation (BV) data. This study was carried out to determine whether new BV values affected the level of compliance to specifications. Our secondary objective was to identify the conditions that would be compromised as a result of poor analytical performance in disease associated markers. This study was based on the results of the SEQCML External Quality Assurance scheme for the 2015-2022 period. Deviation of the individual result from the target value was estimated. Additionally, we calculated the percentage of results that met the pre-established specification. In 97 of the 133 analytes, the level of compliance was maintained in 80-90 % of the results obtained in the two study periods. In 23 analytes, the level of compliance ranged from 51 to 79 % in the two study periods. In ALT, AST and sodium, the level of compliance was≤50 % of the results obtained in the first study period, with sodium being the only analyte that maintained this poor level of compliance in the second study period. The level of compliance to specifications remained independent from the specification used (SEQCML or EFLM) for the majority of the analytes. The results for sodium ion were below the target value, which may lead to misdiagnosis of hyponatremia. Non-compensated alkaline picrate methods overestimate creatinine, which may produce false information suggestive of kidney failure.