External Laryngeal Manipulation Research Articles

Airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society (DAS), Association of Anaesthetists (AoA), British Society of Orthopaedic Anaesthetists (BSOA), Intensive Care Society (ICS), Neuro Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society (NACCS), Faculty of Prehospital Care and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM).

There are concerns that airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury may exacerbate an existing neurological deficit, cause a new spinal cord injury or be hazardous due to precautions to avoid neurological injury. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for practicing clinicians to support safe and effective airway management in this setting. An expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working party conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature (January 2012-June 2022), followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce guidelines to improve airway management for patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury. We included 67 articles in the systematic review, and successfully agreed 23 recommendations. Evidence supporting recommendations was generally modest, and only one moderate and two strong recommendations were made. Overall, recommendations highlight key principles and techniques for pre-oxygenation and facemask ventilation; supraglottic airway device use; tracheal intubation; adjuncts during tracheal intubation; cricoid force and external laryngeal manipulation; emergency front-of-neck airway access; awake tracheal intubation; and cervical spine immobilisation. We also signpost to recommendations on pre-hospital care, military settings and principles in human factors. It is hoped that the pragmatic approach to airway management made within these guidelines will improve the safety and efficacy of airway management in adult patients with suspected or confirmed cervical spine injury.

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Novices: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Intubating the trachea is a challenging task, especially for novice intubators. Successful intubation, in the shortest possible time, prevents hypoxia and hemodynamic disturbances. During the last few decades, video laryngoscopy has proven to be a helpful tool for intubating patients successfully, especially in difficult cases. However, novices must be proficient with a video laryngoscopy. It is not entirely clear which method, direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy, is more successful for tracheal intubation in individuals who have recently started their airway management training. In this study, we aim to investigate this issue. 150 patients were randomly assigned to either direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy by first-year anesthesia assistants. Intubation time, intubation success rate, Cormack-Lehane score, and instances of using the Optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM) maneuver, were recorded. The rate of successful intubation was higher in the direct laryngoscopy group, and the time taken was less. The direct laryngoscopy provided a better view of the glottis than the video laryngoscopy, although this difference was not statistically significant. Direct laryngoscopy resulted in a higher frequency of OELM. Based on our study, the success rate and speed of intubation in novices were higher with direct laryngoscopy compared to video laryngoscopy.

Usefulness of video laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation at thyroid surgical position for intraoperative neuromonitoring

This observational study aimed to compare the glottic view between video and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in the surgical position for thyroid surgery with intraoperative neuromonitoring. Patients scheduled for elective thyroid surgery with intraoperative neuromonitoring were enrolled. After the induction of anesthesia, patients were positioned in the thyroid surgical posture with a standard inclined pillow under their head and back. An investigator assessed the glottic view using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale and the modified Cormack–Lehane grade in direct laryngoscopy and then video laryngoscopy sequentially while using the same McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope at once, with or without external laryngeal manipulation, at the surgical position. A total of thirty-nine patients were participated in this study. Without external laryngeal manipulation, the POGO scale significantly improved during video laryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy in the thyroid surgical position (60.0 ± 38.2% vs. 22.4 ± 23.8%; mean difference (MD) 37.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [29.1, 46.0], P < 0.001). Additionally, with external laryngeal manipulation, the POGO scale showed a significant improvement during video laryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy (84.6 ± 22.9% vs. 58.0 ± 36.3%; MD 26.7%, 95% CI = [18.4, 35.0] (P < 0.001). The superiority of video laryngoscopy was also observed for the modified Cormack–Lehane grade. In conclusion, video laryngoscopy with the McGRATH™ MAC video laryngoscope, when compared to direct laryngoscopy with it, improved the glottic view during tracheal intubation in the thyroid surgical position. This enhancement may potentially facilitate the proper placement of the electromyography tracheal tube and prevent tube displacement due to positional change for thyroid surgery.

Comparison of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscope for bougie-aided naso-tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study.

Video laryngoscopes are commonly used along with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal intubation (NTI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes during bougie-aided NTI with respect to intubation time, success rate, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure. Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II adult patients, with Mallampati grade 1-4, requiring NTI, were enrolled after taking written informed consent. ASA III/IV, restricted mouth opening, and body mass index >30 were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated to intubate with one of the three laryngoscopes (McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview) and the anesthesiologists were well experienced with all of them. The primary outcome was intubation time and secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, external laryngeal manipulation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and hemodynamic responses. The intubation time of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview, was 86.87 ± 15.92, 82.87 ± 16.46, and 79.93 ± 14.53 (mean ± standard deviation) seconds, respectively, which is comparable with Truview being the shortest. CL grade 1 was obtained more in the Truview group (53.3%) compared to the other two groups, while CL grade 3 was obtained in 20% each in McCoy and Macintosh groups. McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes were comparable in performance during bougie-aided NTI, with Truview having the shortest intubation time and better visualization.

COMPARISON BETWEEN C-MAC VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE V/S MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE FOR INTUBATION IN EMERGENCY ICU

Introduction: The incidence of difcult endotracheal intubation is high in the ICU because of various factors. Most commonly used method for endotracheal intubation is direct laryngoscopy. Video Laryngoscopes are also helpful aids which provide a better laryngeal view in comparison to Direct Laryngoscope. We should aim at minimizing the time required to achieve a secure airway for ventilation in patients presenting to the Emergency Department/ICU. This was a prospective randomized study in Emer Methods : gency ICU in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 90 patients requiring endotracheal intubation in Emergency ICU were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients intubated with the help of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Group B included patients intubated with Macintosh Laryngoscope. The primary outcome was to determine overall successful intubation rates. Secondary outcome was to measure rst attempt successful intubation rates, time to intubation, requirement of External Laryngeal Manipulation, requirement of any intubating aids. Patients in Group A and Results : Group B showed an overall similar intubation success rate (p=0.213). Rate of rst attempt intubation in Group A and Group B was similar (p=0.120). Average time to intubation with Group A and Group B was also similar (p=0.0647). Requirement of ELM was lesser with Group A as compared to Group B (p=0.038). The requirement of use of intubating aids was lesser in Group A vs Group B (p=0.003). The use of C- Conclusion : MAC video laryngoscope provided better glottis visualization but resulted in similar rst attempt intubation rates, almost similar time to intubation. C-MAC group required lesser overall requirement of ELM and use of intubating aids when compared to the Macintosh Laryngoscope. Thus, C-MAC® Videolaryngoscopy seems to be a useful technique as the initial approach for endotracheal intubation in the ICU.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF McGRATH MAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ORO-TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN NORMAL AIRWAY.

Background- Oro-tracheal intubation is practiced for oxygenation &amp; ventilation along with inhalational anesthetic delivery and in emergency conditions for securing airway. The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare the intubations by McGrath VL and Macintosh laryngoscope. A prospective, observational s Methodology- tudy in 80 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures with normal airway. All patients were premedicated and pre-oxygenated with 100% O2 for ve minutes and induced with inducing agent inj. Propofol 2mg/kg and neuromuscular blocking agent inj. Succinyl choline 1.5 mg/kg. Patients were divided into 2 groups for Macintosh Laryngoscope and McGrath VL. We have noted TTI, number of intubation attempts, C-L grade, POGO score, modication of positioning, the requirement of external laryngeal pressure manipulation and complications during and after intubations. Haemodynamic parameters were monitored and recorded. Time to intubate in McG VL Group (38.92 ± Observation &amp; Results- 11.07) was signicantly shortened than Mac L Group (57.95 ± 10.37)(). Percentage of glottic opening was better in McGrath Video Laryngoscope group (McG VL) than Macintosh laryngoscope group (Mac L). Incidence of complications were less in McG VL Group than Mac L group. The study Conclusionconcluded that McGrath MAC Video laryngoscope is better than Macintosh laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation in normal airway as it provides earlier time to intubate, signicantly superior glottic view, more rst attempt success rate without any complications and stable vitals.

Comparison of the McGRATHTM Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario: An Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and Objectives: Difficult intubation, which may be encountered unexpectedly during anesthesia, can increase patients' morbidity and mortality. The McGRATH video laryngoscope is known to provide improved laryngeal visibility in patients with difficult or normal airways. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation compared with that of conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway scenarios. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were assigned to the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 50) or McGRATH video laryngoscope (n = 45) groups. In this study, to create a simulated difficult airway condition, the subjects performed manual in-line stabilization and applied a soft cervical collar. The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation within 30 s. The time required for an intubation, glottis grade, intubation difficulty scale (IDS score), the subjective ease of intubation, and optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OLEM) were evaluated. In addition, complications caused by each blade were investigated. Results: The intubation success rate within 30 s was not significantly different between the two groups (44 (88.0%) vs. 36 (80.0%), p = 0.286). The glottic grade was better in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (p = 0.029), but neither the intubation time (26.3 ± 8.2 s vs. 24.2 ± 5.0 s, p = 0.134) nor the rates of oral bleeding (2 (4.0%) vs. 0 (0.0%)) and tooth injury (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (2.2%)) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope did not improve the intubation success rate or shorten the intubation time. However, the McGRATH video laryngoscope provided a better glottis view than the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.

Multiple sinus pauses during suspension laryngoscopy with external laryngeal manipulation in hyperextended neck position in a patient with enlarged cervical lymph nodes: a case report

Suspension laryngoscopy is a commonly performed procedure for effective laryngeal microsurgery (LMS). Although it is associated with few adverse events, cardiac complications such as severe arrhythmia induced by exaggerated vagal tone may arise during this procedure. Here, I present the case of a 52-year-old female patient who presented with a suspected thyroid follicular neoplasm and enlarged cervical lymph nodes. LMS was planned to remove a vocal fold polyp before the thyroid surgery. The patient was placed in a Boyce-Jackson position, and suspension laryngoscopy was performed. However, several sinus pauses were detected whenever external laryngeal manipulation (ELM) was performed to improve surgical field exposure, which was presumed to be attributed to vagal stimulation or reflex induced by numerous external and internal factors during laryngeal manipulation. The suspected mechanism was the direct stimulation of the vagus nerve termed the laryngo-cardiac reflex, or carotid sinus reflex, a type of baroreceptor reflex. When the first episode of sinus pause occurred, the effect-site target concentration of propofol was unadjusted after checking the bispectral index level indicating an adequate anesthetic depth, but ELM was discontinued. When the second episode occurred, ELM could not be stopped until good laryngeal visualization was achieved. Then, the patient received 0.2 mg of intravenous glycopyrrolate. Her heart rate returned within the normal range whenever ELM was not applied. When performing suspension laryngoscopy, the head and neck positioning, the procedure itself and laryngeal manipulation may act as external factors that could induce an exaggerated vagal response. Further, patients with head and neck tumors have various internal factors, such as tumor itself, cervical lymphadenopathy or post-irradiation fibrosis, which can affect the carotid sinus and deteriorate the vagal response. Therefore, careful preoperative evaluation is required to identify these internal factors in advance and take proper care to minimize the additional influence of external factors.

Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study

BackgroundThe head-elevated laryngoscopy position has been described to be optimal for intubation, particularly in obese patients and those with anticipated difficult airways. Horizontal alignment of the external auditory meatus and sternal notch (AM-S) can be used as endpoints for optimal positioning. Thus, we aligned the head-elevated position with the AM-S in the horizontal plane and evaluated its effect on laryngeal visualization and ease of intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.MethodsSixty-four patients were included in this prospective, crossover, randomized controlled trial. A cervical collar was used to restrict neck movement and mouth opening. The head-elevated position was achieved by raising the back section of the operation room table and ensuring that the end point was horizontally aligned with the AM-S (table-ramp method). The laryngeal view was randomly assessed in both head-flat and head-elevated positions based on the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and modified Cormack–Lehane (MCL) grade. External laryngeal manipulation was not permitted when laryngeal visualization was scored. The trachea was intubated only once (in the second position). The ease of intubation was assessed based on the need for optimization maneuvers, intubation difficulty scale (IDS) scores and time to intubation.ResultsThe mean table-ramp angle required to achieve the horizontal alignment of AM-S was 17.5 ± 4.1°. The mean POGO score improved significantly in the head-elevated position (59.4 ± 23.8%) when compared with the head-flat position (37.5 ± 24%) (P < 0.0001). MCL grade 1 or 2a was achieved in 56 (85.9%) and 28 (43.7%) of patients in the head-elevated and head-flat positions, respectively (P < 0.0001). Optimization maneuvers for intubation were required in 7 (21.9%) and 17 (53.1%) patients in the head-elevated and head-flat positions, respectively (P < 0.0001). The IDS scores and time to intubation did not differ significantly between the two positions.ConclusionIn the head-elevated position, aligning the AM-S in the horizontal plane consistently improved laryngeal visualization without worsening the view when the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope was used in patients with simulated difficult airways. It also improved the ease of intubation, which reduced the need for optimization maneuvers.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04716218, on 20/01/2021.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Hyomental Distance Ratio (HMDR) as a New Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy in ICU Patients.

Background: Intubation in the ICU is sometimes unpredictable unlike in an operation theatre, where pre-anesthetic assessment for airway has been done. This study has been done to evaluate the usefulness of hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) in accurately predicting difficult laryngoscopy in ICU patients.Methods: In this study, 104 critically ill patients in the age group 18-70 years, undergoing tracheal intubation in ICU were included. A hard plastic ruler was pressed on the skin surface just above the hyoid bone and the distance to the tip of the anterior-most part of the mentum measured was defined as hyomental distance (HMD). HMD was assessed in neutral and extended head positions, and the HMDR was calculated. All patients were sedated, pre-oxygenated, induced, and relaxed prior to glottic visualization by direct laryngoscopy, which was performed by an experienced anesthetist. Cormack-Lehane's (CL's) grade was assessed without external laryngeal manipulation. Further management was as per ICU protocol.Results: Using the Chi-Square test for statistical analysis, a p-value of HMDR in assessing difficult laryngoscopy was found to be <0.001 suggesting strong significance. HMD in the extended head position (HDMe) showed moderate significance with a p-value of 0.047. HMDR <1.2 can be considered a clinically reliable individual predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in ICU patients.Conclusion: HMDR <1.2 can be used as a simple, easy, and reliable bedside test to predict difficult laryngoscopy amongst ICU patients. An optimal combination of tests is suggested if feasible for better accuracy.

A Comparative Study of Glottic Visualization and Ease of Intubation with McCoy and Macintosh Laryngoscopes

Introduction: The anaesthetist should protect the airways during induction, recovery and maintenance during anaesthesia. The Macintosh blade is the utmost prevalent blades with a slightly back curved that extends all the way to the tip. The McCoy blade is grounded on a normal Macintosh blade with a hinged tip and is functioned by a lever mechanism located at the handle back. Objective: This study attempts to compare McCoy and Macintosh blades to facilitate intubation for glottis imaging. Place and Duration: In the Department of Anesthesia, Divisional Headquarter teaching Hospital Mirpur Azad Kashmir for six months duration from June 2021 to November 2021. Method: The study included 70 Grade I and II ASA adults of both sexes (20 to 60 years) who endured planned surgery under GA necessitating intubation by endotracheal tube. Using a computer-generated randomization table, individuals were assigned randomly to any of the 2 groups contingent on the type of laryngoscope blades used while doing intubation. After anaesthesia induction, ‘laryngoscopy’ was done and the intubation of trachea was done. McCoy Laryngoscope Blade was used in In Group A while Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade in Group B. The number of trials, Cormack Lehane classification, the necessity for external laryngeal manipulation and degree of intubation difficulty were evaluated. Results: Both groups were comparable for sex, weight, age, height, MPC grading, ASA status and among the two groups; no statistically significant alteration was noted (p-value&gt; 0.05). In Group A and B Cormack Lehane classification in Grade-I scored 82.9% and 60%, correspondingly, while Grade-II scoring in Group A and B were 17% and 25.8%, correspondingly. The Grade-I Intubation Difficulty score (IDS) in Groups A and Group B were 88.6% and 80%, respectively, while Grade-II IDS in Groups A and B were 11.4% and 14.2%. 8.5% of patients in group A and 5.7% of patients in group B required two intubation attempts. Conclusion: There are no significant fluctuations to the glottis visualization with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes, but in terms of external manipulation of larynx, the McCoy laryngoscope is superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of comfort of intubation. Keyword: endotracheal tube, Macintosh blades, Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes.

Comparison of endotracheal intubation with Macintosh versus King Vision video laryngoscope using coronavirus disease 2019 barrier box on manikins: A randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus usually spreads through aerosol and close contact. Frontline health-care workers handle aerosol-generating procedures like endotracheal intubation. To reduce this risk, COVID-19 barrier box came into the picture. However, the COVID-19 barrier box may compromise easy and successful intubation, and their limitation must be studied.OBJECTIVES:The objective of this study was to assess the time to successful intubation with or without the COVID-19 barrier box using the Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL). We also assessed the first-pass success rate, ease of intubation, Cormack–Lehane (CL) grade, and requirement of external laryngeal manipulation.METHODS:We conducted this manikin-based randomized crossover study to assess the time to successful intubation by anesthesiologists (22) and emergency physicians (11) having 1 year or more experience with or without COVID-19 barrier box by using the Macintosh laryngoscope and KVVL. Our study randomized the sequence of the four different intubation scenarios.RESULTS:The comparison of mean duration of intubation between KVVL (13.21 ± 4.05 s) and Macintosh laryngoscope (12.89 ± 4.28 s) with COVID-19 barrier box was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 1.21–0.97). The ease of intubation, number of attempts, and requirement of external laryngeal manipulation were not statistically significant. Intubations were statistically significant more difficult with barrier box in view of higher CL grade.CONCLUSION:Time to intubation was longer with COVID-19 barrier box using KVVL as compared to Macintosh laryngoscope which was statistically not significant.

Comparative Evaluation of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope with Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients with Normal Airway Predictors.

Video laryngoscopes (VL) assist in securing the airway faster and more accurately in difficult airways. However, data regarding its usefulness in patients with normal airways are sparse. We designed this study to compare the ease and success of endotracheal intubation between C-MAC and Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) in adult patients with no anticipated airway difficulty. The design involves prospective randomized case - control study. One hundred and twenty adult patients with predicted normal airway were randomized into two groups and were intubated using VL (C-MAC VL) and DL (Macintosh DL), respectively. The Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, time taken for intubation, attempts taken (number), and need for laryngeal maneuvers or stylets were recorded and analyzed for statistical significance. Thirty-eight patients in the DL group and 48 patients in the VL group had CL I view, 20 patients in the DL group and 16 patients in the VL group had CL II, and two patients in the DL group had CL III view. None of the patients in Group VL had CL III view. In seven out of 60 cases in the DL group, difficulty was experienced during insertion of the laryngoscope blade as compared to two cases out of 60 in the VL group. The mean time taken for intubation was lesser in Group DL (28.48 s) as compared to 39.3 s in Group VL. Nine patients in Group DL and 16 patients in Group VL required external laryngeal manipulation. Stylets were used, in seven patients in group DL and in 11 patients in group VL. In patients with a predicted normal airway, C-MAC provides a better glottic view compared to Macintosh DL. Time taken for intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope was more. However, success rates on the first attempt at endotracheal intubation and the number of intubation attempts with either laryngoscope were similar.

A randomized comparative evaluation of C-MAC video-laryngoscope with Miller laryngoscope for neonatal endotracheal intubation.

An efficient neonatal airway management is peculiarly challenging even in the most experienced hands. Considering the recent interest in assessing the performance of various video-laryngoscopes (VL) in pediatric cohort, the prospective randomized study was contemplated to stage a comparative evaluation of C-MAC with Miller laryngoscope for neonatal endotracheal intubation. 150 neonates were randomized to undergo intubation with either the C-MAC VL (n = 75) or the Miller laryngoscope (n = 75) performed by an experienced anesthesiologist in a tertiary care perioperative setting. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO), time to best glottic view (TTBGV), time to intubation (TTI), number of attempts, optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM) employed, and the complications were assessed and compared between the two groups. C-MAC group demonstrated a significantly higher POGO, compared to the Miller group (88 ± 26.7%;76.8 ± 32.1%, respectively, P = 0.022). TTBGV was significantly lower in the C-MAC (7.7 ± 0.1s) group as opposed to the Miller group (11.3 ± 1.1s). The C-MAC group displayed higher TTI values compared to the Miller group (25.4 ± 1.6s; 19.7 ± 1.2s, respectively, P < 0.01). The first-attempt intubation success rate and the number of attempts were comparable in both the groups. OELM was required in 24% of the patients in the Miller group as opposed to 10.7% in the C-MAC group (P = 0.031). Higher patient percentage in the C-MAC group required the need of stylet for assisting a successful intubation, although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Despite an improved view of the glottis, the TTI was higher for C-MAC compared to direct laryngoscopy with a comparable first-attempt success rate in the two techniques.

First-Pass Success of Tracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Registry-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

BackgroundThe incidence of difficult airway is higher in head and neck oncological surgery than in other surgeries. Limited evidence is available on the use of videolaryngoscopes in this cohort. A registry database on perioperative management of these patients was set up in our department in 2017.MethodsData from 2018 to 2019 were retrieved from this database. In 128 patients, videolaryngoscopy was used as the initial airway management of choice. Ease of intubation by first-pass success, its association with accessory manoeuvres, and complications were noted.ResultsOf the patients, 87% (n = 111) were successfully intubated with a videolaryngoscope in the first attempts. There was a strong association between the use of external laryngeal manipulation and successful first-pass intubation with videolaryngoscope. In patients with reduced inter-incisor distance, videolaryngoscope has shown greater benefit. There were very few complications including bleeding from the tumour site and a transient decrease in oxygen saturation to 88% in two patients.ConclusionVideolaryngoscopy was associated with high first-attempt intubation success and we recommend its use as the initial choice for airway management in head and neck cancer patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The available meta-analyses have inconclusively indicated the advantages of video-laryngoscopy (VL) in different clinical situations; therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine efficacy outcomes such as successful first attempt or time to perform endotracheal intubation as well as adverse events of VL vs. direct laryngoscopes (DL) for double-lumen intubation. First intubation attempt success rate was 87.9% for VL and 84.5% for DL (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.86; I2 = 61%; p = 0.08). Overall success rate was 99.8% for VL and 98.8% for DL, respectively (OR = 3.89; 95%CI: 0.95 to 15.93; I2 = 0; p = 0.06). Intubation time for VL was 43.4 ± 30.4 s compared to 54.0 ± 56.3 s for DL (MD = −11.87; 95%CI: −17.06 to −6.68; I2 = 99%; p < 0.001). Glottic view based on Cormack–Lehane grades 1 or 2 equaled 93.1% and 88.1% in the VL and DL groups, respectively (OR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.18 to 9.41; I2 = 63%; p = 0.02). External laryngeal manipulation was needed in 18.4% cases of VL compared with 42.8% for DL (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.40; I2 = 69%; p < 0.001). For double-lumen intubation, VL offers shorter intubation time, better glottic view based on Cormack–Lehane grade, and a lower need for ELM, but comparable first intubation attempt success rate and overall intubation success rate compared with DL.

Video Laryngoscopy Is Associated With First-Pass Success in Emergency Department Intubations for Trauma Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry

We sought to (1) characterize emergency department (ED) intubations in trauma patients and estimate (2) first-pass success and (3) the association between patient and intubation characteristics and first-pass success. We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational cohort of ED intubations from the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR). Descriptive statistics were calculated for all patients who were intubated for trauma at 23 NEAR EDs between 2016 and 2018. We evaluated first-pass success in patients intubated by (1) emergency or pediatric emergency physicians, (2) using rapid sequence intubation or no medications, and (3) either direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy. We used propensity score matching with a generalized linear mixed-effects model to estimate the associations between patient and intubation characteristics and first-pass success. Of the 19,071 intubations in NEAR, 4,449 (23%) were for trauma, and nearly all (88%) had at least one difficult airway characteristic. Prevalence of first-pass success was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.3% to 90.3%). Most patients were intubated with video laryngoscopy, and patients were more likely to be intubated on first-pass with video laryngoscopy as compared to direct laryngoscopy (90% versus 79%). After propensity score matching, video laryngoscopy remained associated with first-pass success (adjusted risk difference 11%, 95% CI: 8% to 14%; and OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.9). Additionally, an initial impression of difficult airway, blood/vomit in the airway, and use of external laryngeal manipulation were all associated with decreased odds of first-pass success. Emergency physicians are successful at intubating patients in the setting of trauma, and video laryngoscopy is associated with twice the odds of first-pass success when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Comparison of Efficacy of External Laryngeal Manipulation (ELM) from Right Versus Left Side during Modified Bimanual Laryngoscopy-A Randomised Cross Over Trial.

Glottic view differed when assistants provide external laryngeal manipulation (ELM) from right or left side. Objectives were to compare glottic view during direct laryngoscopy with ELM applied by assistant stationed on right side of scopist versus left. Primary outcome was best percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score. Secondary outcome was proportion of patients requiring switch back to initial intervention for best glottic view and intubation. With Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee approval and written informed consent, this randomised cross over trial enrolled participants of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II aged 20-70 years for elective surgery under General Anaesthesia (GA). Study interventions were application of ELM during modified bimanual laryngoscopy by trained assistant on right (ELM-R) and left (ELM-L) sides in each participant as per random sequence. Of the 150 participants, 68 were analysed for study interventions using Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Thirty three participants received interventions first from ELM-R and subsequently from ELM-L, while 35 had interventions vice versa. Median POGO score with ELM-R was 40 (IQR: 32.5, 50) and with ELM-L 30 (IQR: 20, 40). There was 10% difference in POGO score between interventions found to be significant (P < .05). Fifty six out of 68 (82.35%) participants had better POGO score when intervention was from right side. Proportion requiring switch back to initially applied intervention was 66.7% (22 out of 33) with ELM-R and 2.9% (one out of 35) with ELM-L. For best glottic view, ELM applied by an assistant by right hand standing on right side of scopist is more effective.

Effects of External Laryngeal Manipulation on Cervical Spine Motion during Videolaryngoscopic Intubation under Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

We hypothesized that external laryngeal manipulation would reduce cervical spine motion during video laryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization by reducing the force required to lift the videolaryngoscope. In this randomized crossover trial, 27 neurointerventional patients underwent two consecutive videolaryngoscopic intubation attempts under manual in-line stabilization. External laryngeal manipulation was applied to all patients in either the first or second attempt. In the second attempt, we tried to reproduce the percentage of glottic opening score obtained in the first attempt. Primary outcomes were cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1, C1–C2, and C2–C5 segments. The intubation success rate (secondary outcome measure) was recorded. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the occiput-C1 segment was significantly smaller with than without external laryngeal manipulation (7.4° ± 4.6° vs. 11.5° ± 4.8°, mean difference −4.1° (98.33% confidence interval −5.8° to −2.3°), p < 0.001), showing a reduction of 35.7%. Cervical spine motion during intubation at the other segments was not significantly different with versus without external laryngeal manipulation. All intubations were achieved successfully regardless of the application of external laryngeal manipulation. External laryngeal manipulation is a useful method to reduce upper cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the King Vision (channeled blade) and the CMAC (D blade) videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Background and Aims:Cervical spine immobilization renders direct laryngoscopy difficult. The CMAC D blade and the channeled blade of the King Vision videolaryngoscopes, have both been used for difficult airway management. Our hypothesis is that the channeled blade of the King Vision would be superior to the CMAC D blade in terms of ease of intubation. We tested this hypothesis in a randomized comparison of the two videolaryngoscopes in patients with simulated cervical spine immobilization.Material and Methods:Hundred patients with no anticipated airway difficulty were randomly allocated to two groups after obtaining informed written consent. Following induction, manual inline stabilization (MILS) was applied to simulate a cervical spine injury and immobilzation. Patients were intubated with either of the two videolaryngoscopes. Time for visualization of the glottis, procedural time, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), and hemodynamic response were recorded.Results:The time to visualize the glottis was shorter in the CMAC D group as compared to the King Vision group (P < 0.001). The incidence of external laryngeal manipulation was less in the King Vision group (P < 0.001). The ease of intubation was superior in the King Vision group, based on the IDS (P < 0.001). The haemodynamic response was similar between the groups.Conclusion:King Vision channeled videolaryngoscope was difficult to introduce into the mouth of the patient during laryngoscopy. Once introduced into the mouth, the time for intubation was less and less external laryngeal manipulation maneuvers were performed to achieve successful intubation. The ease of endotracheal intubation was superior for the King Vision videolaryngoscope. The King Vision videolaryngoscope with proper tranining, could be a safe and portable alternative in patients with cervical spine immobilization.