Extended-release Tacrolimus Research Articles

Use of Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cell-Regulated Gene Expression for Monitoring Immunosuppression with Extended-Release Tacrolimus after Liver Transplantation-A Proof of Concept.

There is a narrow therapeutic window for immunosuppression using calcineurin inhibitors. Drug trough levels do not reflect immunosuppression and should be replaced by pharmacodynamic monitoring. This prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the effect of an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus (LCP Tac) on the nuclear factor of activated T cell-regulated gene expression (NFAT-RGE). The expression of interleukin-2, interferon-γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and three reference genes was measured. Samples from 23 patients at defined time points in the first year after liver transplantation were analyzed using a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. All samples were within the targeted trough levels of LCP Tac, and their LCP Tac peak levels and residual NFAT-RGE showed a strong inverse correlation (r = -0.8). Most importantly, there was an individual immunosuppressive response to the LCP Tac. The mean individual trough effect of LCP Tac on the three target genes when all time points were pooled was 33% (26-56%) in patients without infection and 81% (53-95%) in those with infection (p < 0.011). The mean individual peak effect was 48% (44-64%) in patients without infection and 91% (90-94%) in those with infection (p < 0.001). Thus, tailored immunosuppression based on residual NFAT-RGE could prevent infections associated with over-immunosuppression early after liver transplantation.

Drug-drug interactions between letermovir and tacrolimus in Japanese renal transplant recipients simulated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Letermovir (LET) is a novel antiviral agent recently approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis of renal transplant patients in Japan. However, its interactions with tacrolimus (TAC), an important immunosuppressant, remain ambiguous, warranting careful evaluation considering the unique genetic and physiological characteristics of Japanese patients. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the drug-drug interactions between LET and extended-release TAC (ER-TAC) in Japanese renal transplant patients via physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. We developed PBPK models for LET and TAC, including a new model for ER-TAC, using the Simcyp simulator. We also created a virtual Japanese post-transplant population by incorporating physiological parameters specific to Japanese patients, including CYP3A5 genotypes. Our model accurately predicted the pharmacokinetics of both immediate-release and ER-TAC co-administered with LET. In the Japanese population, LET significantly increased ER-TAC exposure, with the effect varying by CYP3A5 genotype. For CYP3A5*1 carrier, the area under the curve ratio ranged from 2.33 to 2.53, while for CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers, it ranged from 2.82 to 2.86. The maximum concentration ratio was approximately 1.50 across all groups. Our findings suggest reducing the ER-TAC dose by approximately 57-60% for CYP3A5*1 carrier and 65% for CYP3A5*3/*3 carriers when co-administered with LET for Japanese renal transplant patients. Moreover, the developed model incorporating population-specific factors, such as hematocrit values and CYP3A5 genotype frequencies, is a valuable tool to evaluate complex drug interactions and guide the dosing strategies for LET and TAC in Japanese patients. Overall, this study expands the application of PBPK modeling in transplant pharmacology, contributing to the development of effective immunosuppressive strategies for Japanese renal transplant patients.

Immediate-Release versus Extended-Release Tacrolimus: Comparing Blood Pressure Control in Kidney Transplant Recipients – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Hypertension (HTN) is a common side effect of tacrolimus (Tac), the first-line antirejection medication for kidney transplant recipients. The impact of immediate-release tacrolimus (Tac IR) dosed twice daily versus extended-release tacrolimus (Tac ER) dosed once daily on long-term blood pressure control in kidney transplant recipients remains understudied. This study aims to compare the use of Tac IR versus Tac ER in kidney transplant recipients and evaluate the effects of the different formulations on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HTN crisis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study at a single institution collected baseline characteristics, time-varying exposure to Tac IR versus Tac ER, SBP, DBP, HTN crisis, and confounders at each posttransplant visit. A marginal structural linear mixed-effects model was employed to analyze the longitudinal blood pressure control in kidney transplant recipients receiving Tac IR and Tac ER. Results: The final analysis included 654 patients, with mean ages of 52.0 years for Tac IR and 50.3 years for Tac ER. Males constituted 56.7% in Tac IR and 55.0% in Tac ER. Notably, the black population had 2.44 times higher odds of receiving Tac ER after adjusting for the rest of the baseline characteristics. No difference was found between longitudinal SBP (p = 0.386, 95% CI: −1.00, 2.57) or DBP (p = 0.797, 95% CI: −1.38, 1.06). Conclusion: Our study indicates that posttransplant patients taking Tac ER exhibit no difference in chronic SBP and DBP controls compared to Tac IR.

Guiding the starting dose of the once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in "de novo" adult renal transplant patients: a population approach.

The once-daily extended-release tacrolimus formulation (ER-Tac) has demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to the twice-daily immediate-release formulation (IR-Tac), but few population-based pharmacokinetic models have been developed in de novo kidney transplant patients to optimize doses. Therefore, this study aimed i) at developing a population pharmacokinetic model for ER-Tac in de novo adult kidney transplant patients ii) and identifying genetic factors and time-varying covariates predictive of pharmacokinetic variability to guide tacrolimus dosage during the early post-transplant period. A total of 1,067 blood tacrolimus concentrations from 138 kidney transplant patients were analyzed. A total of 29 out of 138 patients were intensively sampled for 24h on the day 5 post-transplantation; meanwhile, for the remaining patients, concentrations were collected on days 5, 10, and 15 after transplantation. Tacrolimus daily doses and genetic and demographic characteristics were retrieved from the medical files. Biochemistry time-varying covariates were obtained on different days over the pharmacokinetic (PK) study. A simultaneous PK analysis of all concentrations was carried out using the non-linear mixed-effects approach with NONMEM 7.5. A two-compartment model with linear elimination and delayed absorption best described the tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Between-patient variability was associated with oral blood clearance (CL/F) and the central compartment distribution volume (Vc/F). Tacrolimus concentrations standardized to a hematocrit value of 45% significantly improved the model (p < 0.001). This method outperformed the standard covariate modeling of the hematocrit-blood clearance relationship. The effect of the CYP3A5 genotype was statistically (p < 0.001) and clinically significant on CL/F. The CL/F of patients who were CYP3A5*1 carriers was 51% higher than that of CYP3A5*1 non-carriers. Age also influenced CL/F variability (p < 0.001). Specifically, CL/F declined by 0.0562 units per each increased year from the value estimated in patients who were 60years and younger. The 36% between-patient variability in CL/F was explained by CYP3A5 genotype, age, and hematocrit. Hematocrit standardization to 45% explained the variability of tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations, and this was of utmost importance in order to better interpret whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations during therapeutic drug monitoring. The dose requirements of CYP3A5*/1 carriers in patients aged 60years or younger would be highest, while CYP3A5*/1 non-carriers older than 60years would require the lowest doses.

Prediction of the Intra-T Lymphocyte Tacrolimus Concentration after Kidney Transplantation with Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

The intracellular tacrolimus concentration in CD3+ T lymphocytes is proposed to be a better representative of the active component of tacrolimus than the whole blood concentration. However, intracellular measurements are complicated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the relationship between intracellular and whole blood tacrolimus concentrations in a population pharmacokinetic model. Twenty-eight de novo kidney transplant recipients, treated with a once-daily oral extended-release tacrolimus formulation, were followed during the first-month post-transplantation. Additional whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations were measured at day 6 ± 1 (pre-dose, 4 and 8 hours post-dose) and day 14 ± 3 (pre-dose) post-transplantation. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling software (NONMEM). The ratio between intracellular (n = 109) and whole blood (n = 248) concentrations was best described by a two-compartment whole blood model with an additional intracellular compartment without mass transfer from the central compartment. The ratio remained stable over time. Prednisolone dose influenced the absorption rate of tacrolimus, while hemoglobin, CYP3A4*22 allele carrier, and CYP3A5 expresser status were associated with the oral clearance of tacrolimus (P-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the intracellular tacrolimus concentrations were correlated with the intracellular production of interleukin-2 (P-value 0.015). The intracellular tacrolimus concentration can be predicted from a measured whole blood concentration using this model, without the need for repeated intracellular measurements. This knowledge is particularly important when the intracellular concentration is ready to be implemented into clinical practice, to overcome the complexities of cell isolation and analytical methods.

LCP-Tacrolimus Extended-Release (Envarsus XR) Use in Adolescent and Young Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Limited published experience describes once daily, extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) use in pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT), particularly nonrenal SOT. LCP-Tac can simplify immunosuppression (IS) regimens, minimize immediate release-tacrolimus (IR-Tac)-associated adverse effects, and promote adherence. This study describes the successful use of LCP-Tac in adolescent and young adult (AYA) SOT populations. A single-center, retrospective chart review of AYA SOT recipients (age < 25 years) converted from IR-Tac to LCP-Tac. Graft survival, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), infection rates, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pill burden were assessed at five time points postconversion (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months). Intrapatient variability of tacrolimus, as assessed by coefficient of variability (CV%), was also analyzed. Twenty-nine AYA SOT recipients (19 heart, 6 kidney, and 4 liver) were converted to LCP-Tac, with a median age of 17.4 years at conversion. Conversion, mainly due to perceived or identified medication nonadherence, occurred at a median of 5.4 years posttransplant. No graft loss occurred within 24 months of conversion, and BPAR incidence rate was consistent with previous reports for these populations. Only one patient experienced CMV infection. Renal function remained stable postconversion. Successful conversion from IR-Tac to LCP-Tac was demonstrated in AYA heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients. These AYA SOT recipients experienced reduced pill burden and improved tacrolimus trough concentration variability. However, the impact on medication adherence warrants further investigation. Future research should explore the targeted use of LCP-Tac to enhance IS tolerability and medication adherence in young SOT populations.

#2129 Tacrolimus-extended-release versus tacrolimus LCPT: preliminary data

Abstract Background and Aims To prevent rejection kidney transplant recipients are treated with immunosuppressive drugs, like tacrolimus. The dosage needed to reach therapeutic trough levels of tacrolimus greatly varies between patients. Currently, there are two tacrolimus extended-release variants on the market. Tacrolimus-extended release (Tac-ER/Advagraf) and tacrolimus LCPT (Tac-LCPT/Envarsus). Tac-LCPT was developed using Meltdose technology to improve absorption. Studies suggest that with Tac-LCPT therapeutic levels can be reached with a lower total dose as compared to Tac-ER. We aim to investigate if the dose needed to reach therapeutic trough levels of tacrolimus can be reduced when using Tac-LCPT as compared to Tac-ER in patients who need a relatively high dose. Method A prospective open-label switch design study was performed in patients 6 months up to 5 years after receiving a kidney transplant, who received Tac-ER, with therapeutic trough levels, and a concentration/dosage ratio (CDR) &amp;lt;1.05 ng/mlx1/mg. Patients were switched from Tac-ER to Tac-LCPT with a dose reduction of 30% for 3 weeks. After these 3 weeks, they were switched back to their original dose of Tac-ER. Total follow-up was 6 weeks with weekly visits for adjustment of the dosage. The primary outcome was the dose of Tac-LCPT needed to reach therapeutic trough levels as compared to Tac-ER. Secondary outcomes were side effects and pill burden. Results For this preliminary analysis, 8 kidney transplant recipients were included. At baseline, the median age was 52.5 (IQR 44.5, 57.0) years old, 75% of patients were male, and the median number of months after transplantation was 14.2 (IQR 11.50, 16.08). The median dose of Tac-ER needed at baseline was 9.0 mg (IQR 8.0, 11.25) with a CDR of 0.89 (IQR 0.68, 0.92). The tacrolimus dosage needed to reach therapeutic trough levels was significantly lower with Tac-LCPT compared to Tac-ER (5.5 mg vs. 9.5 mg, p = 0.03). However, the patients experiencing side effects and the pill burden did not change between the formulations. The Cmax of Tac-ER and Tac-LCPT varied between patients, with no significant difference between formulations (Fig. 1). At the end of the study, two patients preferred to continue Tac-LCPT, one patient preferred Tac-ER and the remaining patients had no preference. Conclusion In conclusion, the total needed dosage of tacrolimus to obtain therapeutic trough levels with Tac-LCPT is smaller than with Tac-ER. However, this smaller dosage administered did not translate to fewer side effects, a smaller pill burden, or a lower peak concentration. When inclusion is completed, additional pharmacokinetics will be calculated as well as the determination of CYP3A5 polymorphisms.

Evaluation of Tacrolimus Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes Between Extended and Immediate Release Formulations in Kidney Transplant

Objectives: Tacrolimus remains the mainstay of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Understanding the relationship between therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes of acute rejection, patient/graft survival, and tolerability are important. The relationship between time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels and outcomes has not been well established, specifically with the use of extended release tacrolimus formulation (LCP-Tac). This study investigated time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels of 2 tacrolimus formulations, LCP-Tac and immediate release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), as a predictor of clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of kidney transplant recipients at Duke Hospital between 2013-2021. The primary objective evaluated the difference in time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels with LCP-Tac vs IR-Tac regimens. Secondary endpoints included time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, incidence of biopsy-proven rejection, development of de novo donor specific antibodies, and patient and allograft survival at 12 months post-transplant. Results: 128 patients were included (63 in LCP-Tac group and 65 in IR-Tac group). The time to therapeutic tacrolimus level was similar between formulations (7.2 days with LCP-Tac compared to 6.7 days with IR-Tac, P = .63). The time within therapeutic range during the first 3 months post-transplant, via modified Rosendaal, was similar with LCP-Tac and IR-Tac (56.1% vs 64.8%, respectively). Rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were similar (7/63 (11.1%) compared to 4/65 (6.2%)). There was no difference in patient/graft survival between groups. Conclusions: The time to therapeutic tacrolimus levels did not differ based on tacrolimus formulation and was not correlated with clinical outcomes.

(57) - Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Immediate versus Extended Release Tacrolimus; Reducing Calcineurin Inhibitor Related Toxicity in Lung Transplantation Patients; The Revolution Trial

(57) - Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Immediate versus Extended Release Tacrolimus; Reducing Calcineurin Inhibitor Related Toxicity in Lung Transplantation Patients; The Revolution Trial

Three-year outcomes of de novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation

BackgroundExtended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. We compared long-term efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. Methods25 prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 3 years following transplant was compared between groups using non-inferiority analysis. ResultsLCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 16% (90%CI, −37%, −1%, non-inferiority p = 0.002) up to 3 years following heart transplant. Up to 3-years post-transplant, 14 patients remained on once-daily LCPT and 10 patients were switched to IR-tacrolimus due to lack of insurance coverage. There were no significant differences in the rate of chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, cytomegalovirus requiring treatment, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and malignancy within 3 years following transplant. ConclusionLCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus in heart transplantation with a similar safety profile. Narrowly-constrained FDA labels specific to kidney transplant remain a barrier to consistent access to many immunosuppressant medications for recipients of non-kidney solid organs. We recommend the FDA consider developing facile pathways for expanding the approved label of extended-release tacrolimus formulations to heart transplant recipients.

Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study.

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) exhibits increased bioavailability versus immediate-release (IR-TAC) and prolonged release (PR-TAC) tacrolimus. Improvements in tremor were previously reported in a limited number of kidney transplant patients who switched to LCPT. We conducted a non-interventional, non-randomized, uncontrolled, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study to assess the impact of switching to LCPT on tremor and quality of life (QoL) in a larger population of stable kidney transplant patients. The primary endpoint was change in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score; secondary endpoints included 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores, tacrolimus trough concentrations, neurologic symptoms, and safety assessments. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess change in TETRAS score and tacrolimus trough concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio by prior tacrolimus formulation and tacrolimus metabolizer status. Among 221 patients, the mean decrease of TETRAS score after switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). There was no statistically significant difference in change in TETRAS score after switch to LCPT between patients who had received IR-TAC and those who had received PR-TAC before switch, or between fast and slow metabolizers of tacrolimus. The overall increase of C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and from baseline to either M1 or M3 (both p < 0.0001) in the mITT population and in all subgroups. In the fast metabolizers group, the C0/D ratio crossed over the threshold of 1.05ng/mL/mg after the switch to LCPT. Other neurologic symptoms tended to improve, and the SF-12 mental component summary score improved significantly. No new safety concerns were evident. In this observational study, all patients had a significant improvement of tremor, QoL and C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT irrespective of the previous tacrolimus formulation administered (IR-TAC or PR-TAC) and irrespective from their metabolism status (fast or slow metabolizers).

Dosing strategies for de novo once-daily extended release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients based on CYP3A5 genotype.

Tacrolimus extended-release tablets have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the de novo kidney transplant population. Dosing requi rements often vary for tacrolimus based on several factors including variation in metabolism based on CYP3A5 expression. Patients who express CYP3A5 often require higher dosing of immediate-release tacrolimus, but this has not been established for tacrolimus extended-release tablets in the de novo setting. To obtain target trough concentrations of extended-release tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients according to CYP3A5 genotype. Single-arm, prospective, single-center, open-label, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT037 13645). Life cycle pharma tacrolimus (LCPT) orally once daily at a starting dose of 0.13 mg/kg/day based on actual body weight. If weight is more than 120% of ideal body weight, an adjusted body weight was used. LCPT dose was adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 8-10 ng/mL. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 genotype was performed at study conclusion. Mean time to therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentration was longer in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (6 d vs 13.5 d vs 4.5 d; P = 0.025). Mean tacrolimus doses and weight-based doses to achieve therapeutic concentration were higher in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (16 mg vs 16 mg vs 12 mg; P = 0.010) (0.20 mg/kg vs 0.19 mg/kg vs 0.13 mg/kg; P = 0.018). CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers experienced lower mean tacrolimus trough concentrations throughout the study period compared to CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers and non-expressers (7.98 ng/mL vs 9.18 ng/mL vs 10.78 ng/mL; P = 0 0.008). No differences were identified with regards to kidney graft function at 30-d post-transplant. Serious adverse events were reported for 13 (36%) patients. Expression of CYP3A5 leads to higher starting doses and incremental dosage titration of extended-release tacro limus to achieve target trough concentrations. We suggest a higher starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d for CYP3A5 expressers.

Sirolimus in combination with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Many challenges remain for long-term survival of renal allografts. Once-daily sirolimus (SRL) combined with low-dose extended-release tacrolimus (LER-TAC) may improve medication adherence and reduce the potential nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) compared with standard immunosuppression regimens, thus potentially improving long-term graft survival. This retrospective, observational, single-center, propensity score matching (PSM) study compared conversion to SRL combined with low-dose ER-TAC and mycophenolic acid (MPA) combined with standard-dose TAC in kidney transplant recipients. After PSM, there were 56 patients in each group. Efficacy, safety, and medication adherence were evaluated over 12 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of graft and recipient survival and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (p = 1.000), and none of the recipients developed dnDSA after conversion. The mean eGFR improved in SRL + LER-TAC group after conversion compared to before conversion (51.12 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 56.97 ± 19.23 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.05). The medication adherence at 12 months after conversion was superior to before conversion (p = 0.002). Our findings suggest that an immunosuppressive regimen of SRL combined with low-dose ER-TAC is no less effective and safe than standard immunosuppressive regimens for renal transplant recipients and may improve graft renal function and medication adherence.

Comparing Long-Term Blood Pressure Management in Kidney Transplant Patients: Immediate-Release vs. Extended-Release Tacrolimus

Comparing Long-Term Blood Pressure Management in Kidney Transplant Patients: Immediate-Release vs. Extended-Release Tacrolimus

A report of a prospective randomized trial of extended-release tacrolimus versus immediate release tacrolimus after liver transplantation with anti-thymocyte induction in a steroid free protocol.

Our study hypothesis was that once daily dosing of extended-release tacrolimus (XRT) would be a safe and effective immunosuppression (IS) with the potential to decrease adverse events (AEs) associated with immediate release tacrolimus (IRT) after liver transplantation (LT). All patients receiving LT at our center received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) induction therapy. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either XRT or IRT. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was the same between arms, and both groups received an antimetabolite for the first 6 months following LT. Patients were then followed at pre-determined study intervals for the following year after LT. We administered the RAND-36SF survey to assess patient's health-related quality of life at pre-determined intervals. All analysis was performed with an intention to treat basis. We screened 194 consecutive patients and enrolled 110. Our control and study arms were well matched. Transplant characteristics were similar between groups. At all timepoints, both arms had similar serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated by MDRD6 equation, with post-transplant GFRs between 60 and 70mL/min/1.73m2 . Tacrolimus trough levels were similar between arms. The XRT arm had fewer AEs (166) and fewer serious AEs (70) compared to IRT (201 and 99, respectively). AEs most commonly were renal, infectious, or gastrointestinal in nature. While not statistically significant, XRT was held temporarily (25vs. 35 cases) or discontinued (3vs. 11 cases) less frequently than IRT and had fewer instances of rejection (7vs. 12 cases). This analysis showed that XRT is safe and effective as de novo maintenance IS in a steroid-free protocol with RATG.

Impact of obesity on the conversion of immediate-release tacrolimus to extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Outcomes analyzing conversion from IR-tacrolimus (IR) to LCP-tacrolimus (LCP) in obesity are limited. This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients converted from IR to LCP from June 2019 to October 2020. Primary outcomes were conversion ratios for weight-based dose at a steady-state therapeutic level and identification of appropriate dosing weight. Other outcomes included tacrolimus coefficient of variation (CV), time in therapeutic range (TITR), adverse events, infections, donor specific antibodies (DSAs), and acute rejection. A total of 292 patients were included; 156 and 136 patients with a BMI<30 and BMI≥30kg/m2 , respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for pancreas transplant, diabetes, and HLA mismatch. IR to LCP conversion ratio ranged from .73 to .79. Mean LCP dose was similar (.08 vs. .07mg/kg/day for BMI<30 and BMI≥30kg/m2 , respectively); there was a significant difference in IR and LCP mg/kg dosing at steady state with TBW (.11mg/kg vs.09mg/kg and .08mg/kg vs. .06mg/kg, respectively). The most appropriate dosing weight was adjusted body weight (AdjBW), consistent across IR and LCP steady-state doses, and might yield more accurate steady-state dosing requirements. In multivariable modeling, BMI was a significant predictor of steady state mg/kg dosing at therapeutic goal for total body weight (TBW), but not ideal body weight (IBW) or AdjBW.

P.25: Pharmacokinetic (PK) levels before and after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) in SPK transplant recipients

P.25: Pharmacokinetic (PK) levels before and after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) in SPK transplant recipients

Böbrek nakli hastalarında de novo uzatılmış salımlı takrolimus; Güvenli mi?

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether de novo extended-release tacrolimus (ERT) therapy is safe in kidney recipients.&#x0D; Methods: The study was single-center, retrospective, and included a total of 57 patients, including 30 patients in the ERT group (Group 1) and 27 patients in the immediate-release tacrolimus (IRT) group (Group 2). Demographic and laboratory characteristics of the patients were recorded. Complications such as acute drug toxicity, acute rejection, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, and development of hypertension, opportunistic infection, and hospitalization data were recorded.&#x0D; Results: The mean age of the patients was 46.23±14.2 years in the ERT group and 47.04±14.6 years in the IRT group. There were 21 (70%) males in group 1, while 20 (74%) patients in group 2 had a male gender (P=0.73). The rate of improved serum creatinine values in the first week postoperatively was similar in both groups. While the mean tacrolimus levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in the group- 1 (P

Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Treatment of Severe Essential Tremor in a Lung Transplant Recipient–A Case Report

Calcineurin inhibitor-related tremors occur in up to 50% of solid organ transplant recipients and are disabling in severe cases. We describe a bilateral lung transplant recipient with essential tremors that significantly worsened after tacrolimus initiation. She did not have improvement with the change to extended-release tacrolimus, the use of everolimus as a calcineurin inhibitor-sparing agent, or the addition of primidone, clonazepam, or propranolol. She underwent magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy with significant improvement in her tremor and activities of daily living.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Envarsus Versus Immediate Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function

The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in the United States continues to increase. The effect of immediate-release tacrolimus (tacrolimus) compared with extended-release tacrolimus (Envarsus) among recipients with DGF is unknown. This was a single-center open-label randomized control trial among KTRs with DGF (ClinicalTrials. gov, NCT03864926). KTRs were randomized either to continue on tacrolimus or switch to Envarsus at a 1:1 ratio. Duration of DGF (study period), number of dialysis treatments, and need for adjustment of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) doses during the study period were outcomes of interest. A total of 100 KTRs were enrolled, 50 in the Envarsus arm and 50 in the tacrolimus arm; of those, 49 in the Envarsus arm and 48 in the tacrolimus arm were included for analysis. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics, all P > .5, except donors in the Envarsus arm had higher body mass index (mean body mass index 32.9 ± 11.3 vs 29.4 ± 7.6 kg/m2 [P=.007]) compared with the tacrolimus arm. The median duration of DGF (5 days vs 4 days, P=.71) and the number of dialysis treatments (2 vs 2, P=.83) were similar between the groups. However, the median number of CNI dose adjustments during the study period in the Envarsus group was significantly lower (3 vs 4, P=.002). Envarsus patients had less fluctuation in the CNI level, requiring fewer CNI dose adjustments. However, there were no differences in the DGF recovery duration or number of dialysis treatments.