Extended One-generation Reproductive Toxicity Study Research Articles

Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study of food-grade titanium dioxide E171 with emphasis on reproductive and endocrine endpoints

Food-grade titanium dioxide E171 was administered in feed to Sprague Dawley rats in an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study (OECD Test 443). The dosed diet (0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg body weight/day) started 10 weeks before mating and continued throughout the study. After weaning, pups were allocated to Cohorts 1 A/1B (to assess reproductive toxicity), 2 A/2B (to assess developmental neurotoxicity), and 3 (to assess developmental immunotoxicity); in addition, Cohort 1B was mated to produce an F2 generation and satellite F0 animals were evaluated for colonic aberrant crypt foci (ACF). In F0 animals, there were no systemic toxicity or reproductive effects, no treatment-related histopathological changes, and no ACF in the colon. Serum estradiol or testosterone concentrations were not changed in F0 or F1 animals. No pre-/postnatal developmental changes related to treatment were noted in F1 animals, and the reproductive performance of F1 Cohort 1B animals was unaffected. F2 pups showed no abnormalities in pre- or postnatal development (postnatal days 4–8). No treatment-related developmental neurotoxicity was observed in Cohorts 2 A/2B. Although no treatment-related immunotoxicity was observed in Cohort 3, the positive control did not induce the expected response; this segment of the study will be repeated. Analyses of blood and urine showed negligible systemic absorption of E171 from the gastrointestinal tract upon dietary ingestion. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for parental systemic toxicity, reproductive toxicity, offspring toxicity, and developmental neurotoxicity was considered 1000 mg/kg body weight/day. For developmental immunotoxicity, a NOAEL was not determined owing to insufficient T-cell-dependent antibody response in the positive control. Our study provides robust data on the reproductive toxicity and preneoplastic potential of E171.

Perinatal exposure to the immune-suppressant di-n-octyltin dichloride affects brain development in rats

Disruption of the immune system during embryonic brain development by environmental chemicals was proposed as a possible cause of neurodevelopmental disorders. We previously found adverse effects of di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTC) on maternal and developing immune systems of rats in an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study according to the OECD 443 test guideline. We hypothesize that the DOTC-induced changes in the immune system can affect neurodevelopment. Therefore, we used in-vivo MRI and PET imaging and genomics, in addition to behavioral testing and neuropathology as proposed in OECD test guideline 443, to investigate the effect of DOTC on structural and functional brain development. Male rats were exposed to DOTC (0, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg of diet) from 2 weeks prior to mating of the F0-generation until sacrifice of F1-animals. The brains of rats, exposed to DOTC showed a transiently enlarged volume of specific brain regions (MRI), altered specific gravity, and transient hyper-metabolism ([18F]FDG PET). The alterations in brain development concurred with hyper-responsiveness in auditory startle response and slight hyperactivity in young adult animals. Genomics identified altered transcription of key regulators involved in neurodevelopment and neural function (e.g. Nrgrn, Shank3, Igf1r, Cck, Apba2, Foxp2); and regulators involved in cell size, cell proliferation, and organ development, especially immune system development and functioning (e.g. LOC679869, Itga11, Arhgap5, Cd47, Dlg1, Gas6, Cml5, Mef2c). The results suggest the involvement of immunotoxicity in the impairment of the nervous system by DOTC and support the hypothesis of a close connection between the immune and nervous systems in brain development.

Is there any added value of the second generation in the Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS)? A retrospective analysis of 24 EOGRTS

The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) is a standard information requirement under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and restriction of Chemicals (REACH) in Europe. Inclusion of an F2 generation is considered useful if this impacts hazard identification or when it provides additional information altering the reproductive or developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and subsequent risk assessment. In this retrospective analysis the added value of the F2 generation in 24 EOGRTS was evaluated. Our retrospective analysis showed an added value of the second generation in 1/24 EOGRTS only, where extending with the F2 generation lowered both the reproductive and developmental NOAEL. For this substance, extension with the F2 generation led to classification for effects on fertility. Hazard identification for developmental effects was not impacted based on clear developmental toxic effects already observed in the F1 generation and in previous studies with this substance. Risk assessment may be impacted if the developmental toxic effects are the most critical effects observed for this substance. For 23/24 studies included in this retrospective analysis, hazard and risk assessment were unaffected by inclusion of the F2 generation. Moreover, for 13/13 studies with external triggers for inclusion of the F2 generation hazard and risk assessment were unaffected. By decreasing the number of EOGRTS that are extended with an F2 generation, the number of animals used in regulatory developmental and reproductive toxicity studies may be significantly reduced in the future without negatively affecting the ability to identify potentially harmful chemicals.

S03-02: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS) in the EU regulatory context

S03-02: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity study (EOGRTS) in the EU regulatory context

Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study evaluating gardenia blue in Sprague Dawley rats

Gardenia blue powder was administered at 0.5%, 2.5%, or 5.0% in feed to male and female Sprague Dawley rats in an Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (OECD Test Guideline 443). The dosed diet began 14 days before mating and was continued at the same concentration level for the entire study for all parental animals (P0) and offspring (F1). At weaning, offspring were allocated into one of 5 cohorts for different endpoints. P0 and F1 animals had blue urine, blue or black feces, and blue discolorations in gastrointestinal organs, mesenteric lymph nodes, and kidneys. This treatment-related finding was not considered adverse as there were no histopathologic correlates. There was a dose-related increase in sperm concentration in P0 and F1 males. There were dose-related increases in heart weights of F1 postnatal day (PND) 21 males, male and female thyroid weights, and female TSH levels of PND 91 F1 offspring, with no histopathological correlate. There were no consistent treatment-related adverse effects on any other parameters evaluated for general toxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, or developmental immunotoxicity. The highest dietary concentration (5.0%) of gardenia blue powder was the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for male and female rats at all life stages evaluated.

Extended one generation reproductive toxicity study and effect on gut flora of genetically modified rice rich in β-carotene in wistar rats

To evaluate the reproductive toxicity of gene modified rice generated by introducing phytoene synthase (Psy) and bacterial phytoene desaturase (CrtI) from maize and Erwinia uredovora, Wistar rats were allocated into 3 groups and fed with Psy and CrtI gene modified rice mixture diet (GM group), non-gene modified rice mixture diet (non-GM group), and AIN-93 diet (Blank control group) from parental generation (F0) to the offsprings (F1). GM rice, Heijinmi (HJM) and Non-GM rice, Heishuai (HS), were both formulated into diets at ratios of 73.5% and 75.5% according to the AIN93 diet for rodent animals, respectively. Relative to the non-GM group, no biologically relevant differences were observed in GM group rats concerning reproductive performance such as fertility rate, gestation rate, mean duration, hormone level, and reproductive organ pathology. The developmental parameters results were not significantly different from the non-GM group such as body weight, food consumption, developmental neurotoxicity, behavior, hematology, and serum chemistry. In terms of immunotoxicity, the IgG indicators of offspring from the GM group improved in contrast with the non-GM group. Additional gut flora analysis of F0 generation rats resulted as that the treatment elicited an increased gut microflora diversity of F0 rats. And no horizontal gene transfer of Psy and CrtI genes in rats fed a GM rice HJM diet. In conclusion, we found no adverse effects related to GM rice in the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study, indicating that GM rice is a safe alternative for its counterpart rice regarding reproductive toxicity.

Safety assessment of 2-methyloxolane as a food extraction solvent.

The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) assessed the safety of 2‐methyloxolane as an extraction solvent under the intended conditions of use and the maximum residue limits (MRLs) proposed by the applicant. 2‐Methyloxolane is intended to be used in processes currently applying hexane for oil and protein extraction from plant sources or for extraction of food additives. The proposed MRLs for the following uses are: (i) 1 mg/kg in fat, oil or butter; (ii) 10 mg/kg in defatted protein products, defatted flour and other defatted solid ingredients; (iii) 1 mg/kg in food category 13 (foods intended for particular nutritional uses as defined by Directive 2009/39/EC); and (iv) 1 mg/kg for the extraction of food additives. The Panel calculated the dietary exposure with the highest potential maximum (95th percentile) for toddlers as 0.32 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day. Based on the available toxicological data, the Panel concluded that 2‐methyloxolane was rapidly metabolised with a low bioaccumulation potential and does not raise a concern for genotoxicity. The Panel identified different no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in a subchronic oral toxicity study in rats, an oral developmental toxicity study and an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study, and a TDI of 1 mg/kg bw per day for 2‐methyloxolane was derived based on the lowest identified NOAEL (100 mg/kg bw per day) for reproductive and developmental toxicity. This TDI was not exceeded in any of the population groups at the mean and 95th percentile exposure. The Panel concluded that the extraction solvent 2‐methyloxolane does not raise a safety concern when used according to the intended conditions and at the proposed MRLs in the extracted foods or food ingredients.

Adverse postnatal developmental effects in offspring from humidifier disinfectant biocide inhaled pregnant rats

Inhalation exposure to polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-P), one of the primary biocides used in humidifier disinfectants, caused a fatal pulmonary disease in Korea. Pregnant women were also exposed to PHMG-P, and subsequent studies showed that PHMG-P inhalation during pregnancy adversely affects their health and embryo-fetal development. However, the postnatal developmental effects after birth on prenatally PHMG-P-exposed offspring have not yet been investigated. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the postnatal development of prenatally PHMG-P-exposed offspring. Pregnant rats (22 or 24 females per group) were exposed to PHMG-P during pregnancy in a whole-body inhalation chamber at the target concentrations of 0, 0.14, 1.60, and 3.20 mg/m3. After parturition, the prenatally exposed offspring were transferred to non-exposed surrogate mothers to minimize the secondary effects of severe maternal toxicities. Postnatal development of offspring was then examined with a modified extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study design. At 3.20 mg/m3 PHMG-P, increased perinatal death rates and decreased viability index (postnatal survival of offspring between birth and postnatal day 4) were observed. In addition, F1 offspring had lower body weight at birth that persisted throughout the study. PHMG-P-exposed pregnant rats also had severe systemic toxicities and increased gestation period. At 1.60 mg/m3 PHMG-P, a decreased viability index was also observed with systemic toxicities of PHMG-P-exposed pregnant rats. These results indicate that prenatal PHMG-P exposure adversely affects the offspring's future health and could be used for human risk assessment.

Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive.

The present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. Based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive.

Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity (EOGRT) study of benzoic acid in Sprague Dawley rats

Benzoic acid (BA) was administered in the diet to male and female Sprague Dawley Crl:CD(SD) rats in an OECD Test Guideline 443 Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity (EOGRT) study to test for effects that may occur as a result of pre- and postnatal exposure. The study included cohorts of F1 offspring to evaluate potential effects of benzoic acid on reproduction, the developing immune system, and the developing neurological system with the inclusion of learning and memory assessments. Benzoic acid was incorporated in the diet at concentrations of 0, 7,500, 11,500, and 15,000 mg/kg diet (ppm). These concentrations were selected based on the results of preliminary studies, and, based on average food consumption, were intended to supply BA doses of approximately 0, 500, 750, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. To avoid exceeding these target dose levels, the dietary concentrations were adjusted (based on historical control body weight and food consumption data) to maintain the target mg/kg bw/day dose levels during those life periods when food intake per unit of body weight was increased to support milk production by females (gestation and lactation) and rapid pup growth (post-weaning).In the parental (F0) generation, survival, clinical observations, organ weights, pathology, hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and bile acids were unaffected by BA administration. Reproductive parameters were also unaffected by BA administration.In the F1 generation, survival, growth and developmental landmarks, organ weights, pathology, immunotoxicity assessment, and neurotoxicity and neurobehavioral parameters such as auditory startle response, locomotor activity, learning and memory assessments were unaffected by BA administration, as were clinical pathology (hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, bile acids and thyroid hormones) and reproductive performance. Similarly, no adverse effects or systemic toxicity were observed in the F2 generation.Overall, the highest dietary concentration (15,000 ppm), providing a dosage of approximately 1000 mg/kg bw/day, was the NOAEL for benzoic acid in this EOGRT study.

Effects of endocrine disruptor furan on reproductive physiology of Sprague Dawley rats: An F1 Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS).

The present study investigated the reproductive toxicity of furan in an Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study in rats. Sprague Dawley F0 weaning rats (30 per sex per group) were exposed to furan orally at 0, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg kg-1 for 10 weeks (males) and 2 weeks (females) and then mated. Results of F0 indicated that in the furan-treated groups (5 mg kg-1 and 10 mg kg-1), body weight (bw) gain decreased during prebreed and gestational period while increased during lactation periods. F0 animals prebreeding exposure resulted in head tilt and foot splay at 10 mg kg-1. Number of live pups at birth were decreased (p < 0.001) at 10 mg kg-1. At postnatal day (PND) 70, a significant (p = 0.03) decrease in testosterone levels of male rats and estrogen levels of female rats (p = 0.05) was observed in 10 mg kg-1 furan-treated group in F1 generation. Luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone levels were also reduced, but their reduction was not statistically significant in all groups. In higher dose furan group (10 mg kg-1), testicular and ovarian weights were reduced in F1 generation at PND 70, with decreased daily sperm production (p = 0.01) and disturbed estrous cyclicity (p < 0.01). Some histopathological changes were also observed in testis and ovaries in groups whose parents were previously exposed to 10 mg kg-1 bw of furan group. Based on the above results, it is suggested that exposure to food-based contaminant furan induced remarkable changes in the F0 (parental stage) and F1 (offspring, pubertal, and adult stage) generations of Sprague Dawley rats.

Is there a rationale for direct dosing of chemicals to nursing pups in the EOGRTS (OECD 443)?

In OECD guideline 443 – Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) – to be used for testing industrial and agrochemicals, it has been indicated that careful consideration of benefits and disadvantages should be made prior to conducting direct-dosing studies in nursing pups. Nursing pups will not be directly dosed in dietary and drinking water studies whereas in oral gavage studies this possibility exists. Besides the risk of intubation trauma and overdosing due to direct exposure and exposure via the mother's milk, direct dosing could lead to a different hazard assessment of chemicals depending on the choice of the route of administration. In addition, in case of industrial and agrochemicals used in industrial or professional settings only, there will never be direct exposure of newborns. Moreover, direct dosing of nursing pups is an artificial, non-physiological, route of exposure and as such it would hamper risk assessment. It should therefore only be considered in exceptional cases and justified on a case-by-case approach.

Opinion on the follow-up of the re-evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives.

In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sorbic acid (E 200) and potassium sorbate (E 202), established by the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS Panel) in 2015. From the EOGTRS, the FAF Panel identified a lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) of 1,110 mg sorbic acid/kg body weight (bw) per day. By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202). In addition, European Commission asked EFSA to review a report on the ‘Stability of sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202) during food processing and storage’ provided by industry. No new information was provided in this report, and therefore, in this opinion, there was no re‐assessment of the EFSA ANS opinion conclusions from 2015 regarding the stability of sorbates in food.

Suggestions for the OECD's extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study to further understand the temporality of endocrine-disrupting effects from chemical exposure: example using bisphenol A

Suggestions for the OECD's extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study to further understand the temporality of endocrine-disrupting effects from chemical exposure: example using bisphenol A

Regulatory aspects under REACH relating to the developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) cohort in the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS)

Regulatory aspects under REACH relating to the developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) cohort in the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS)

An extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study of plant protection product containing glyphosate on rats – Androgen- and estrogen-dependent endpoints

Roundup Transorb® (RT) is a glyphosate-based herbicide and despite its wide use around the world there are few studies comparing the effects of the active ingredient with the formulated product. In this context the purpose of this study was to compare the genotoxicity of the active ingredient glyphosate with the formulated product RT in order to clarify whether the active ingredient and the surfactant of the RT formula may exert toxic effects on the DNA molecule in juveniles of fish Prochilodus lineatus. Erythrocytes and gill cells of fish exposed to glyphosate and to RT showed DNA damage scores significantly higher than control animals. These results revealed that both glyphosate itself and RT were genotoxic to gill cells and erythrocytes of P. lineatus, suggesting that their use should be carefully monitored considering their potential impact on tropical aquatic biota.

Guidance on the selection of cohorts for the extended one-generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD test guideline 443)

The extended one-generation reproduction toxicity study (EOGRTS; OECD test guideline 443) is a new and technically complex design to evaluate the putative effects of chemicals on fertility and development, including effects upon the developing nervous and immune systems. In addition to offering a more comprehensive assessment of developmental toxicity, the EOGRTS offers important improvements in animal welfare through reduction and refinement in a modular study design. The challenge to the practitioner is to know how the modular aspects of the study should be triggered on the basis of prior knowledge of a particular chemical, or on earlier findings in the EOGRTS itself, requirements of specific regulatory frameworks notwithstanding. The purpose of this document is to offer guidance on science-based triggers for these extended evaluations.

Reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: Examination of the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study guideline

An important aspect of safety assessment of chemicals (industrial and agricultural chemicals and pharmaceuticals) is determining their potential reproductive and developmental toxicity. A number of guidelines have outlined a series of separate reproductive and developmental toxicity studies from fertilization through adulthood and in some cases to second generation. The Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) is the most recent and comprehensive guideline in this series. EOGRTS design makes toxicity testing progressive, comprehensive, and efficient by assessing key endpoints across multiple life-stages at relevant doses using a minimum number of animals, combining studies/evaluations and proposing tiered-testing approaches based on outcomes. EOGRTS determines toxicity during preconception, development of embryo/fetus and newborn, adolescence, and adults, with specific emphasis on the nervous, immunological, and endocrine systems, EOGRTS also assesses maternal and paternal toxicity. However, EOGRTS guideline is complex, criteria for selecting doses is unclear, and monitoring systemic dose during the course of the study for better interpretation and human relevance is not clear. This paper discusses potential simplification of EOGRTS, suggests procedures for relevant dose selection and monitors systemic dose at multiple life-stages for better interpretation of data and human relevance.

2. Regulation of Chemicals

This year, some of the annexes to EC Regulation 1907/2006 Concerning the Regulation, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH Regulation) were amended, and case law emerged. Outside of the REACH Regulation, a certain substance was approved as an active substance for use in biocidal products, and the commission decided on its position to be taken in negotiations about the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Stockholm Convention). EU Regulation 2015/282 amends Annexes VIII, IX and X to the Reach Regulation, specifying the scope of a new modular test method called the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS), which was adopted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2011. According to the current amendment, a two-generation reproductive toxicity study is regularly required to fulfil the standard information requirements in point 8.7.3 of Annexes IX and X. However, under EOGRTS, breeding and assessment of a second filial generation and testing for developmental neurotoxicity and developmental immunotoxicity constitute distinct and independent modules (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/282, preamble, para. 3). EOGRTS focuses on the analysis of the first filial generation and addresses additional parameters in the hope of improvements in sensitivity and the level of information that can be gained from the tests.

Regulatory acceptance and use of the Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study within Europe

The two-generation study (OECD TG 416) is the standard requirement within REACH to test reproductive toxicity effects of chemicals with production volumes >100tonnes. This test is criticized in terms of scientific relevance and animal welfare. The Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS), incorporated into the OECD test guidelines in 2011 (OECD TG 443) has the potential to replace TG 416, while using only one generation of rats and being more informative. However, its regulatory acceptance proved challenging. This article reconstructs the process of regulatory acceptance and use of the EOGRTS and describes drivers and barriers influencing the process. The findings derive from literature research and expert interviews. A distinction is made between three sub-stages; The stage of Formal Incorporation of the EOGRTS into OECD test guidelines was stimulated by retrospective analyses on the value of the second generation (F2), strong EOGRTS advocates, animal welfare concern and changing US and EU chemicals legislation; the stage of Actual Regulatory Acceptance within REACH was challenged by legal factors and ongoing scientific disputes, while the stage of Use by Industry is influenced by uncertainty of registrants about regulatory acceptance, high costs, the risk of false positives and the manageability of the EOGRTS.