Expression Of Vancomycin Resistance Research Articles

Binding sites of VanRB and σ70 RNA polymerase in the vanB vancomycin resistance operon of Enterococcus faecium BM4524

The vanB operon of Enterococcus faecium BM4524 which confers inducible resistance to vancomycin is composed of the vanR(B)S(B) gene encoding a two-component regulatory system and the vanY(B)WH(B)BX(B) resistance genes that are transcribed from promoters P(RB) and P(YB) respectively. In this study, primer extension revealed transcription start sites at 13 and 48 bp upstream from the start codon of vanR(B) and vanY(B), respectively, that allowed identification of -10 and -35 promoter motifs. The VanR(B) protein was overproduced in Escherichia coli, purified and phosphorylated (VanR(B)-P) non-enzymically with acetylphosphate. VanR(B)-P and VanR(B) specifically bound to P(RB) and P(YB) promoters. VanR(B) bound at a single site at position -32.5 upstream from the P(RB) transcriptional start site and at two sites at positions -33.5 and -55.5 upstream from that of P(YB). The proximal VanR(B) binding site overlapped the -35 region of both promoters. VanR(B) was converted from a monomer to a dimer upon acetylphosphate treatment. VanR(B)-P had higher affinity than VanR(B) for its targets and appeared more efficient than VanR(B) in promoting open complex formation with P(RB) and P(YB). In the absence of regulator, E. coli RNA polymerase was able to interact with P(RB) but not with P(YB). Phosphorylation of VanR(B) significantly increased promoter interaction with RNA polymerase and led to an extended and modified footprint. In vitro transcription assays showed that VanR(B)-P activates P(YB) more strongly than P(RB). Analysis of the protected regions revealed one copy of a 21 bp sequence in the P(RB) promoter and two copies in the P(YB) promoter which may serve as recognition sites for VanR(B) and VanR(B)-P binding that are required for transcriptional activation and expression of vancomycin resistance.

Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 Is Essential for Expression of High-Level Vancomycin Resistance and Cell Wall Synthesis in Vancomycin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carrying the Enterococcal vanA Gene Complex

A combination of biochemical and genetic experiments were performed in order to better understand the mechanism of expression of high-level vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The transcription of pbp2 of the highly vancomycin- and oxacillin-resistant strain COLVA200 and its mutant derivative with inactivated mecA were put under the control of an inducible promoter, and the dependence of oxacillin and vancomycin resistance and cell wall composition on the concentration of the isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside inducer was determined. The results indicate that mecA--the genetic determinant of oxacillin resistance--while essential for oxacillin resistance, is not involved with the expression of vancomycin resistance. Penicillin binding protein 2A, the protein product of mecA, appears to be unable to utilize the depsipeptide cell wall precursor produced in the vancomycin-resistant cells for transpeptidation. The key penicillin binding protein essential for vancomycin resistance and for the synthesis of the abnormally structured cell walls characteristic of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (A. Severin, K. Tabei, F. Tenover, M. Chung, N. Clarke, and A. Tomasz, J. Biol. Chem. 279:3398-3407, 2004) is penicillin binding protein 2.

High Level Oxacillin and Vancomycin Resistance and Altered Cell Wall Composition in Staphylococcus aureus Carrying the Staphylococcal mecA and the Enterococcal vanA Gene Complex

Recently, for the first time in the history of this bacterial species, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying the enterococcal vanA gene complex and expressing high level resistance to vancomycin was identified in clinical specimens (CDC (2002) MMWR 51, 565-567). The purpose of our studies was to understand how vanA is expressed in the heterologous background of S. aureus and how it interacts with the mecA-based resistance mechanism, which is also present in these strains and is targeted on cell wall biosynthesis. The vanA-containing staphylococcal plasmid was transferred from the clinical vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) strain HIP11714 (CDC (2002) MMWR 51, 565-567) to the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain COL for which extensive genetic and biochemical information is available on staphylococcal cell wall biochemistry and drug resistance mechanisms. The transconjugant named COLVA showed high and homogeneous resistance to both oxacillin and vancomycin. COLVA grown in vancomycin-containing medium produced an abnormal peptidoglycan: all pentapeptides were replaced by tetrapeptides, and the peptidoglycan contained at least 22 novel muropeptide species that frequently showed a deficit or complete absence of pentaglycine branches. The UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide, the major component of the cell wall precursor pool in vancomycin-sensitive cells was replaced by UDP-MurNAc-depsipeptide and UDP-MurNAc-tetrapeptide. Transposon inactivation of the beta-lactam resistance gene mecA caused complete loss of beta-lactam resistance but had no effect on the expression of vancomycin resistance. The two major antibiotic resistance mechanisms encoded by mecA and vanA residing in the same S. aureus appear to use different sets of enzymes for the assembly of cell walls.

Role of penicillin-binding protein 4 in expression of vancomycin resistance among clinical isolates of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

It has been reported that penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) activity decreases when a vancomycin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolate is passaged in vitro to vancomycin resistance. We analyzed the PBP profiles of four vancomycin intermediately susceptible S. aureus (VISA) clinical isolates and found that PBP4 was undetectable in three isolates (HIP 5827, HIP 5836, and HIP 6297) and markedly reduced in a fourth (Mu50). PBP4 was readily visible in five vancomycin-susceptible, oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (ORSA) isolates. The nucleotide sequences of the pbp4 structural gene and flanking sequences did not different between the VISA and vancomycin-susceptible isolates. Overproduction of PBP4 on a high-copy-number plasmid in the VISA isolates produced a two- to threefold decrease in vancomycin MICs. Inactivation of pbp4 by allelic replacement mutagenesis in three vancomycin-susceptible ORSA strains (COL, RN450M, and N315) led to a decrease in vancomycin susceptibility, an increase in highly vancomycin-resistant subpopulations, and decreased cell wall cross-linking by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Complementation of the COL mutant with plasmid-encoded pbp4 restored the vancomycin MIC and increased cell wall cross-linking. These data suggest that alterations in PBP4 expression are at least partially responsible for the VISA phenotype.

Comparative in vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against multidrug resistant Enterococcus faecium

The in vitro susceptibilities of 82 strains of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF), (49 vanA and 33 vanB) from over 13 hospitals in Europe and United States were studied. The MIC for several antibiotics showed high levels of resistance to vancomycin, ampicillin, gentamicin, and imipenem. All VREF strains were highly susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin with a MIC 90% of 0.5 μg/ml for both vanA and vanB phenotypes. Time-kill and synergy studies of VREF for quinupristin/dalfopristin alone and quinupristin/dalfopristin in combination with several antibiotics (ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin and novobiocin) did not show bactericidal activity. In induction experiments using SF6550, (VREF, a vanA strain), quinupristin/dalfopristin showed a delay in the expression of vancomycin resistance by 2.5 hours. The results of this study show quinupristin/dalfopristin to have excellent in vitro activity versus multiple resistant E. faecium.

Penicillin tolerance and modification of lipoteichoic acid associated with expression of vancomycin resistance in VanB-type Enterococcus faecium D366.

Induction of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium D366, which exhibits a VanB-type resistance, as well as its constitutive expression in MT9, a derivative of D366, was associated with penicillin tolerance as shown by decreased lysis and killing of the cells. This phenomenon was linked neither to decreased expression of the different autolysins nor to their decreased lytic activity on the different cell walls. The only change observed was that almost twice the normal amount of D-alanine was attached to the lipoteichoic acid.

In-vitro synergy and mechanism of interaction between vancomycin and ciprofloxacin against enterococcal isolates.

In-vitro synergy between vancomycin and ciprofloxacin against 44 enterococcal isolates was studied. Synergy occurred in chequerboard MIC determinations with six Enterococcus faecium strains resistant to both vancomycin and ciprofloxacin. The combination was additive for strains susceptible to one or both antibiotics. Time-kill studies involving selected strains with different susceptibility patterns confirmed the chequerboard results. The effect of ciprofloxacin on the induction of vancomycin resistance was compared in two vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecium. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin prevented induction of vancomycin resistance in a ciprofloxacin-resistant strain, but not in a ciprofloxacin-susceptible strain. Membranes isolated from vancomycin-resistant ciprofloxacin-resistant cultures grown with vancomycin and ciprofloxacin at < or = 8 mg/L (0.125 x MIC) expressed a 39.5-kDa membrane protein involved in the expression of vancomycin resistance, but the protein was not detected in membranes from cultures grown in ciprofloxacin 16 mg/L. These findings indicated that a vancomycin-ciprofloxacin combination can be synergic against enterococci resistant to both vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, but would be unlikely to offer any advantage in the treatment of enterococcal infections because of the high concentrations required.