Insulinoma-associated Protein 1 Expression Research Articles

The Significance of Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 in the Pathological Diagnosis of Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Biopsy Specimens.

Objective: Our purpose was to investigate the clinicopathological diagnostic value of immunohistochemical antibody for insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) in biopsy specimens of SCLC. Methods: Biopsy specimens of SCLC diagnosed at the pathology department of Tangshan Gongren Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were selected. INSM1 expression was detected and compared with conventional neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A (CHGA), and CD56 regarding expression sensitivity and specificity. Results: The sensitivity of INSM1 expression was significantly higher than that of CHGA (95% vs 50%, P = .000), but there was no statistically significant difference in the specificity of INSM1, SYP, CHGA, and CD56 expression (100% vs 94% vs 98% vs 92%, respectively, P = .241, 1.000, .126). Conclusions: INSM1 antibody shows high sensitivity and specificity in the expression of SCLC and serves as a reliable immunohistochemical marker in the clinicopathological diagnosis of SCLC in biopsy specimens.

The role of insulinoma-associated protein 1 in predicting the progression and prognosis of human olfactory neuroblastoma in China

ObjectiveRecent studies have suggested that insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a useful marker for pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. In the present study, we investigated the association between INSM1 expression and prognosis in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and assessed the usefulness of INSM1 as a prognostic biomarker in these patients. MethodImmunohistochemistry was performed on 109 ONB patients who underwent endoscopic surgery at Beijing Tong Ren Hospital (Beijing, China) between June 2006 and November 2021 Patient age at the time of surgery ranged from 10 months to 72 years (mean age, 43.55 ± 13.47 years). In total, 63 (57.8%) and 46 (42.2%) tumors occurred in male and female patients, respectively. The percentages of grade I–IV cases were 13.8% (15/109), 36.7% (40/109), 29.4% (32/109) and 20.2% (22/109), respectively. ResultsThe expression rate (moderately/strongly positive) of INSM1 was significantly higher in high-grade (Ⅲ/Ⅳ; 83%; 45/54) than low-grade (Ⅰ/Ⅱ; 27%; 15/55) ONB cases. High expression levels of INSM1 were significantly positively associated with high pathological stage (p < 0.001), local recurrence, and death. Kaplan‑Meier analysis revealed that patients with high INSM1 expression had significantly shorter disease‑free survival (DFS) and mean survival (75.01 ± 10.71 vs. 158.56 ± 10.32) times, and shorter overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that INSM1 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR: 4.963, 95%CI [2.11–10.84] p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 4.791, 95%CI [2.117–10.485], p < 0.001) after adjusting for sex, age, and tumor grade. In addition, INSM1 was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients treated with surgery (HR: 3.714, 95%CI [1.267–10.889], p = 0.017) and chemotherapy (HR: 5.574, 95%CI [1.584–19.612], p = 0.007). ConclusionINSM1 expression had a positive association with the prognosis of patients with ONB and could serve as a prognostic biomarker in these patients.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1) Expression in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Newly Discovered Diagnostic Marker

Abstract Introduction Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous group of neoplasms with relatively low incidence. Diagnosis of NENs requires an integrated approach of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular study. In the present study, we evaluated insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) expression in NENs and correlated it with other established neuroendocrine markers. Materials and Method Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care center. Consecutively, 100 cases from year November 2019 to January 2021 were enrolled in the study and all relevant data were noted. Results The mean (±standard deviation) age of the patients was 55.5 (±10.6) years with a male preponderance. Total 59% of the tumors were located in the lung of which 67% were poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. INSM1 were positive in 97% cases, while synaptophysin (SYN) in 96% and chromogranin A (CgA) in 86%. Correlation of INSM1 expression with SYN and CgA was statistically significant (p-value &lt; 0.05). Mean H-score of INSM1 was significantly higher than SYN and CgA and it was statistically significant (p-value &lt; 0.001). Conclusion In the present study, the expression of INSM1 was seen in 97% cases of NENs. A statistically significant association was found between INSM1 and traditional NE markers. As a nuclear marker it is easy to interpret and it showed higher H-score. We conclude that INSM1 is a highly sensitive marker and recommend to incorporate it in the routine practice to aid in the diagnostic workup. However, a larger cohort is required to establish the organ-specific sensitivity and specificity of INSM1.

High expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) distinguishes colorectal mixed and pure neuroendocrine carcinomas from conventional adenocarcinomas with diffuse expression of synaptophysin.

Complementary to synaptophysin and chromogranin A, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Since there are no comparative data regarding INSM1 expression in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs) and colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas/neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs/NECs), we examined INSM1 in a large cohort of conventional CRCs and MANECs/NECs. In conventional CRC, we put a special focus on conventional CRC with diffuse expression of synaptophysin, which carry the risk of being misinterpreted as a MANEC or a NEC. We investigated INSM1 according to the immunoreactive score in our main cohort of 1,033 conventional CRCs and 21 MANECs/NECs in comparison to the expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A and correlated the results with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. All MANECs/NECs expressed INSM1, usually showing high or moderate expression (57% high, 34% moderate, and 9% low), which distinguished them from conventional CRCs, which were usually INSM1 negative or low, even if they diffusely expressed synaptophysin. High expression of INSM1 was not observed in conventional CRCs. Chromogranin A was negative/low in most conventional CRCs (99%), but also in most MANECs/NECs (66%). Comparable results were observed in our independent validation cohorts of conventional CRC (n = 274) and MANEC/NEC (n = 19). Similar to synaptophysin, INSM1 expression had no prognostic relevance in conventional CRCs, while true MANEC/NEC showed a highly impaired survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (e.g. disease-specific survival: p < 0.001). MANECs/NECs are a highly aggressive variant of colorectal cancer, which must be reliably identified. High expression of INSM1 distinguishes MANEC/NEC from conventional CRCs with diffuse expression of the standard neuroendocrine marker synaptophysin, which do not share the same dismal prognosis. Therefore, high INSM1 expression is a highly specific/sensitive marker that is supportive for the diagnosis of true colorectal MANEC/NEC.

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma: A study of 17 cases focusing on the diagnostic utility of INSM1 expression and presenting rare morphological variants associated with non-EWSR1::NR4A3 fusions.

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare sarcoma of uncertain lineage. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has recently been described as a highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker for EMC. The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic significance of INSM1 immunohistochemistry in EMC. Furthermore, correlations between molecular and morphological findings were performed. Sixteen of 17 EMC cases were stained with the INSM1 antibody. Tumors with at least 5% INSM1-positive cells and any staining intensity were considered positive. Molecular testing was successfully performed in 12/17 cases. The immunohistochemical analysis detected 13 INSM1-positive (81%) and 3 INSM1-negative tumors (19%). The extent of the staining was classified as 1+ in 7 cases (44%), 2+ in 2 cases (13%), 3+ in 2 cases (13%) and 4+ in 2 cases (13%). Intensity of immunostaining was weak in 5 cases (31%), moderate in 2 cases (13%) and strong in 6 cases (38%). Molecular assays revealed 8 EWSR1::NR4A3 positive tumors (67%), 2 TAF15::NR4A3 positive tumors (17%), 1 TCF12::NR4A3 positive tumor (8%) and 1 NR4A3 positive tumor (8%) in which no other gene alteration was identified. Two of them, namely TCF12 positive and one TAF15 positive tumors, were highly cellular and partially associated with pseudopapillary architecture. Our study found that moderate/strong expression of INSM1 in more than 25% of tumor cells was present in only 31% of cases. Thus, the diagnostic utility of INSM1 is rather low. Two morphologically unique cases of non-EWSR1 rearranged EMC with an extremely rare pseudopapillary growth pattern are also reported.

INSM1 Expression in Mesenchymal Tumors and Its Clinicopathological Significance.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been identified as a nuclear marker of neuroendocrine tumors. Although INSM1 appears to be a subtle and specific biomarker for neuroendocrine tumor, its expression and clinicopathological significance in mesenchymal tumors remain unclear. We analyzed INSM1 mRNA level in GEO database and conducted immunohistological staining to detect the expression of INSM1 on 576 mesenchymal tumors from pathology department of Tongji Hospital. At transcription level, INSM1 expression in AITL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma) was higher than their adjacent normal tissues as well as Hodgkin's lymphoma. Moreover, INSM1 expression in well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) was significantly higher than normal fat (P = 0.014) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) (P = 0.0248). At protein level, the positive rate of INSM1 in AITL was 18/48 (47.4%), while in DDLPS was 9/20 (45%). INSM1 expression in AITL was significantly higher than Hodgkin's lymphoma (P = 0.008). And INSM1 expression in WDLPS was significantly lower than DDLPS (P = 0.015). The combination of GEO data and immunohistochemistry data indicated that the expression level of INSM1 was higher in AITL compared with normal control, suggesting that INSM1 may be involved in pathogenesis of AITL. The abnormal expression of INSM1 was found in WDLPS, and the positive rate of INSM1 was higher in DDLPS than in WDLPS. INSM1 may be involved in the regulation of liposarcoma development. There were significant differences in the expression of INSM1 between AITL and Hodgkin's lymphoma and WDLPS and DDLPS. These findings may assist in the differential diagnosis of these tumors when common markers are difficult to identify, enriching the diagnostic index system of mesenchymal tumors.

Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1): Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Use in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is an aggressive and difficult to treat cancer. Although immunohistochemistry is not mandatory for a SCLC diagnosis, it might be required, especially in small samples. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is expressed in endocrine and nervous tissues during embryogenesis, generally absent in adults and re-expressed in SCLC and other neuroendocrine neoplasms. Its high specificity propelled its use as diagnostic biomarker and an attractive therapeutic target. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic and critical review on the use of INSM1 for diagnosis, prognostication and the treatment of SCLC. An extensive bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed® focusing on articles published since 2015. According to the literature, INSM1 is a highly sensitive (75–100%) and specific (82–100%) neuroendocrine immunohistochemical marker for SCLC diagnosis. It can be used in histological and cytological samples. Although advantageous, its standalone use is currently not recommended. Studies correlating INSM1 expression and prognosis have disclosed contrasting results, although the expression seemed to entail a worse survival. Targeting INSM1 effectively suppressed SCLC growth either as a suicide gene therapy regulator or as an indirect target of molecular-targeted therapy. INSM1 represents a valuable biomarker for a SCLC diagnosis that additionally offers vast opportunities for the development of new prognostic and therapeutic strategies.

Immunohistochemical analyses of the expression profiles of INSM1, ATRX, DAXX and DLL3 in solid papillary carcinomas of the breast.

Solid papillary carcinoma (SPC) is a rare but distinct clinicopathological feature of breast cancer characterised by frequent neuroendocrine differentiation. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a useful neuroendocrine marker for various neuroendocrine tumours. α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked protein (ATRX) and death domain-associated protein (DAXX) are useful prognostic markers for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have addressed INSM1 expression in SPCs. Although ATRX, DAXX and δ-like canonical notch ligand 3 (DLL3) are frequently expressed in neuroendocrine lung carcinomas, there are no reports on their expression in SPCs. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyse the expression profiles of INSM1, ATRX, DAXX and DLL3 in the largest series of patients with SPC that has been, to the best of our knowledge, studied until now. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to determine chromogranin A, synaptophysin, INSM1, ATRX, DAXX and DLL3 expression in 39 specimens surgically resected from patients with SPC (18 SPC in situ and 21 SPC invasive). The associations between the expression of these markers and the clinicopathological factors were investigated. Chromogranin A, synaptophysin and INSM1 were expressed in 64.1, 100 and 92.3% of the patients, respectively. Both ATRX and DAXX expression was observed in 28.2% of the patients. No patient expressed DLL3. Lack of INSM1 or chromogranin A expression was significantly associated with advanced pathological stages in patients with SPC (P=0.033) and in patients with invasive SPC (P=0.012), showing a tendency for a high Ki-67 labelling index (LI) and advanced histological grade in patients with invasive SPC. Loss of ATRX or DAXX expression was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion, but not with histological grade, Ki-67 LI or presence of invasive tumours. Thus, INSM1 was demonstrated to be a useful diagnostic marker for SPCs. Overall, detecting the lack of INSM1 or chromogranin A expression may be useful for analysing the characteristics of tumour cells in SPCs.

SOX11 is a sensitive and specific marker for pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine tumors

BackgroundSynaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin A (CGA), CD56 and insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) are proposed neuroendocrine (NE) markers used for diagnosis of pulmonary NE tumors. These NE markers have been identified in subsets of non-NE tumors requiring differential diagnosis, thus we sought to explore new NE markers.MethodsWe evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of SOX11, a transcription factor involved in neurogenesis, in pulmonary NE tumors and large cell carcinomas (LCCs).ResultsWe found that SOX11 showed a sensitivity similar to INSM1 and CGA, and less than SYN and CD56 in small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs). While SOX11 is more specific than the other four markers for diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HG-NECs) because 1) None of LCCs (0/63), the most challenging non-NE tumor type for differential diagnosis due to overlapped morphology with LCNECs displayed SOX11 positivity. While expression of at least one of SYN, CGA, CD56 or INSM1 was identified in approximately 60% (18/30) of LCCs. 2) SOX11 was only expressed in 1 of 37 carcinoid tumors in contrast to diffuse expression of SYN, CGA, CD56 and INSM1. In HG-NECs, we noticed that SOX11 was a good complementary marker for SCLC diagnosis as it was positive in 7 of 18 SYN−/CGA−/CD56− SCLCs and 3 of 8 SYN−/CGA−/CD56−/INSM1− SCLCs, and SOX11 positivity in 4 of 6 SYN−/CGA−/CD56− cases previously diagnosed as LCCs with NE morphology provides additional evidence of NE differentiation for reclassification into LCNECs, which was further confirmed by electromicroscopical identification of neurosecretory granules. We also found SOX11 expression cannot predict the prognosis in patients with HG-NECs.ConclusionsTherefore, SOX11 is a useful complementary transcriptional NE marker for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SCLC and LCNEC.

Prognostic value and non-neuroendocrine role of INSM1 in small cell lung cancer

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant lung neuroendocrine tumor with early metastasis, rapid progression, and poor outcomes. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been an excellent marker for neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation and widely used in the diagnosis of NE neoplasms, including SCLC. However, its role beyond NE diagnostic marker remained little reported. MethodsWe examined immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 73 surgically resected SCLC, analyzed its prognostic value by Kaplan-Meier method, and investigated clinical-pathological features of INSM1 high SCLC. In vitro, We assessed INSM1 function on glucose intake, tumor migration, and Cisplatin resistance by 2-NBDG glucose uptake fluorescent assay, transwell assay, and ANNEXIN V/PI assay, respectively. In vivo, we evaluated the therapeutic value of metformin on reversing INSM1 induced chemoresistance by BALB/c nude mice xenograft tumor model. ResultsHigh INSM1 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) (p = 0.0005), later TNM stages (p = 0.0003), and predicted poor survival (Log-rank p = 0.038). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed INSM1 as an independent prognostic factor in SCLC (p = 0.012, HR:3.195, 95%CI:1.288–7.927). Interestingly, LNM was correlated with worse prognosis only in patients received chemotherapy (Log-rank p = 0.027) rather than the others (Log-rank p = 0.40). In patients having LNM and treated with chemotherapy, high INSM1 was correlated with worse clinic outcome (Log-rank p = 0.009). In vitro, overexpression of INSM1 decreased AMPK-α expression as well as glucose intake, promoted tumor cell migration, and limited the apoptosis induced by Cisplatin, which all could be reversed by Metformin. In vivo, INSM1 overexpression also contributed to tumor growth beyond inducing Cisplatin resistance. ConclusionOur finding suggested INSM1 played more role than a NE marker, partly through down-regulating AMPK signal. INSM1 may serve as a novel prognostic marker and therapeutic target in SCLC.

Expression of CD200 and INSM1 in gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and its diagnostic values

Objective: To investigate the expression and diagnostic values of CD200 and insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) in gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GIP-NEN). Methods: The expression of CD200, INSM1, Syn and CgA was detected in 69 cases of GIP-NEN, 66 cases of gastrointestinal and pancreatic non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (GIP-nonNEN) and 16 cases of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasm by immunohistochemistry, to compare the values of CD200, INSM1, Syn, CgA and their combinations in diagnosing GIP-NEN. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used. Results: The immunoreactivity of CD200 was present in the cytoplasma and/or membrane of the neoplasms cells, the positive expression rates in GIP-NEN and GIP-nonNEN were significantly different (P<0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of CD200 for diagnosing GIP-NEN were 95.7% and 78.8%, respectively. There was significant difference of the positive rates of CD200 between neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma (P=0.05). The immunoreactivity of INSM1 was present in the nuclei of neoplasms cells. The positive expression rates in GIP-NEN and GIP-nonNEN were significantly different (P<0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 for diagnosis of GIP-NEN were 85.5% and 95.5%, respectively. There were also significantly different positive rates of INSM1 between neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma, as well as between G1 and G3 neuroendocrine tumors (P<0.05). There was no difference in the area under ROC curve (AUC) of single stain of CD200, INSM1, Syn or CgA (0.857, 0.907, 0.890 and 0.833, respectively, P>0.05). The sensitivity of combined CD200+INSM1 stains for diagnosing GIP-NEN was significantly higher than that of Syn+CgA (85.5% vs. 63.8%, P<0.05). The AUC of two combinations were 0.962 and 0.925, respectively, which were not statistically different (P>0.05). Conclusions: CD200 and INSM1 are two novel markers of neuroendocrine neoplasm, which aid to diagnosis for GIP-NEN and exclude its mimickers. They are associated with tumor grades. Combining both as an immunohistochemical panel shows high sensitivity and specificity. Thus, the combined panel can be utilized as useful supplement for Syn and CgA.

P66.08 Differential Expression of INSM1 Between Pure SCLC and LCNEC After Surgical Resection and Its Clinicopathological Significance

According to WHO diagnostic criteria, both Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and Large cell neuroendocrine (LCNEC) are categorized into high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on morphological features and immunostaining of neuroendocrine markers including CD56, chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin (Syn). However, the above markers have limited satisfactory significance of specificity and sensitivity. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is highly expressed in SCLC cells as a zinc finger protein, and numerous studies have shown that INSM1 positive staining has a strong correlation with NE differentiation in SCLC and an alternative diagnostic biomarker for SCLC, but few studies are involved in LCNEC and its significance remains unclear in LCNEC. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of INSM1 as a neuroendocrine marker by comparing the expression of INSM1 in SCLC and LCNEC and its clinicopathological significance. 347 surgically resected lung cancer including 290 pure SCLC and 57 pure LCNEC samples were retrieved in this retrospective study. INSM1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry staining in SCLC and LCNEC tissue microarrays. The different expression of INSM1 between SCLC and LCNEC as well as the correlation with clinicopathological features including gender, age, smoking history, tumor location, AJCC 7th stage, reginal lymph node metastasis, pleural invasion and tumor thrombosis were analyzed by chi-square test. Of the included patients, male/female ratio was 2.33 (203/87) in SCLC and 10.4 (52/5) in LCNEC, the smoker rate was 64.5% (187/290) in SCLC and 43.9% (25/57) in NSCLC. According to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition), the SCLC patients were 29.0% (84/290) in stage I, 27.2% (79/290) in stage II, 40.7% (118/290) in stage III, and 3.1% (9/290) in stage IV, while the NSCLC patients were 49.1% (28/57) in stage I, 26.3% (15/57) in stage II, and 24.6% (14/57) in stage III, respectively. INSM1 was localized in the nucleus of lung cancer cells, a significant higher positive rate was detected in SCLC than that in LCNEC (271/290,93.4% in SCLC; 32/57,56.1% in LCNEC; p<0.05). INSM1 protein expression significantly correlated with smoking history (p=0.023), pleural invasion (p=0.010), and a positive trend of regional lymph node metastasis (p=0.052) in SCLC, but did not correlate with any of the clinicopathological features in LCNEC (p＞0.05). INSM1 protein was found no prognostic significance neither in SCLC nor in LCNEC (p＞0.05). INSM1 protein is highly expressed in SCLC and positively correlated with pleural invasion and smoking history. In contrast, INSM1 expression in LCNEC is significant lower and does not correlated with such clinicopathological features. Further research needs to be done on exploring the potential different underlying mechanisms and diagnostic significance of INSM1 in SCLC and LCNEC.

Reciprocal YAP1 loss and INSM1 expression in neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a rare but aggressive histologic variant of prostate cancer that responds poorly to androgen deprivation therapy. Hybrid NEPC-adenocarcinoma (AdCa) tumors are common, often eluding accurate pathologic diagnosis and requiring ancillary markers for classification. We recently performed an outlier-based meta-analysis across a number of independent gene expression microarray datasets to identify novel markers that differentiate NEPC from AdCa, including up-regulation of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) and loss of Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1). Here, using diverse cancer gene expression datasets, we show that Hippo pathway-related genes, including YAP1, are among the top down-regulated gene sets with expression of the neuroendocrine transcription factors, including INSM1. In prostate cancer cell lines, transgenic mouse models, and human prostate tumor cohorts, we confirm that YAP1 RNA and YAP1 protein expression are silenced in NEPC and demonstrate that the inverse correlation of INSM1 and YAP1 expression helps to distinguish AdCa from NEPC. Mechanistically, we find that YAP1 loss in NEPC may help to maintain INSM1 expression in prostate cancer cell lines and we further demonstrate that YAP1 silencing likely occurs epigenetically, via CpG hypermethylation near its transcriptional start site. Taken together, these data nominate two additional markers to distinguish NEPC from AdCa and add to data from other tumor types suggesting that Hippo signaling is tightly reciprocally regulated with neuroendocrine transcription factor expression. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 in non–small cell lung cancers: a diagnostic pitfall for neuroendocrine tumors

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported as a highly sensitive and specific marker of neuroendocrine tumors. INSM1 expression has also been reported, although uncommonly, in non-neuroendocrine tumors. This study aimed to elucidate potential nonspecific INSM1 expression in non-small cell non-neuroendocrine lung cancers (NSCNELCs), especially in squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs) with basaloid features to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed for 324 NSCNELCs, including 196 adenocarcinomas (AdCs), 86 SqCCs, and 42 other NSCNELCs. In addition, 38 whole-tissue sections of SqCCs with basaloid features were examined. INSM1 immunostain was semiquantitively evaluated based on the percentage of nuclear staining in tumor cells, categorized as negative, focal (<10% tumor cells), and positive (>10% tumor cells). Among 324 TMAs, 6.2% (20/324) were positive for INSM1, 4.9% (16/324) were focal, and 88.9% (289/34) were negative. Of 196 AdCs, 5.1% (10/196) were positive for INSM1, 4.7% (9/196) were focal, and 90.3% (177/196) were negative. Of 86 SqCCs, 9.3% (8/86) were positive for INSM1, 5.8% (5/86) were focal, and 84.9% (73/86) were negative. Of the remaining 42 NSCNELCs, 4.8% (2/42) were positive for INSM1, 4.8% (2/42) were focal, and 90.4% (38/44) were negative. Among 38 cases of whole-tissue sections of SqCCs with basaloid features, 15.8% (6/38) were positive for INSM1, 18.4% (7/38) were focal, and 65.8% (25/38) were negative. Our study demonstrates that INSM1 is expressed in a significant subset of NSCNELCs, suggesting caution in interpreting INSM1 staining, especially with limited samples. INSM1 should not be used as a stand-alone neuroendocrine marker in differentiating primary lung tumors.

Utility of Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1) and Mucin 2 (MUC2) Immunohistochemistry in the Distinction of Endocrine Mucin-Producing Sweat Gland Carcinoma From Morphologic Mimics.

Endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma (EMPSGC) is a rare low-grade adnexal malignancy with a predilection for the eyelids of elderly White women, which is associated with invasive mucinous carcinoma with endocrine features in one-third of cases. EMPSGC is characterized by the presence of neuroendocrine differentiation and mucin production. However, EMPSGC displays a variety of architectural patterns including solid, cribriform, papillary, and cystic growth. In addition, EMPSGC may also display nonendocrine cytologic features, such as apocrine change. Because of their variable appearance, EMPSGC can show significant morphologic overlap with certain histologic mimics, namely basal cell carcinoma, hidrocystoma, apocrine hidradenoma, and tubular adenoma. In addition, the often limited sampling of this anatomically delicate area can make the diagnosis of EMPSGC challenging. EMPSGC expresses neuroendocrine markers, including synaptophysin and chromogranin, often in a focal distribution. However, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been found to be a more sensitive marker for EMPSGC. Recent studies have also demonstrated the expression of the gel-forming mucin 2 (MUC2) in EMPSGC, possibly signifying a lacrimal or conjunctival origin of these neoplasms. In this article, we discuss EMPSGC in the context of its histologic mimics (BCC, hidrocystoma, apocrine hidradenoma, and tubular adenoma) and we investigate the utility of the immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 and MUC2 in the distinction of EMPSGC from them. We demonstrate that INSM1 and MUC2 can reliably distinguish EMPSGC from these histologic mimics.

INSM1 Expression in Chordomas

Chordomas are rare malignant tumors with a broad differential diagnosis, including chondrosarcomas and metastatic carcinomas. Recently, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has gained great interest regarding the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors but also extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas. However, its expression in chordomas remains largely unknown. We retrospectively examined 57 chordomas for INSM1 expression. INSM1 expression was found in only 5% of tumors. This marker is rarely expressed in this type of tumor, raising questions about neuroendocrine differentiation.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in a large series of genetically-confirmed Ewing’s sarcoma family tumor: Does it provide any diagnostic or prognostic information?

Given the potential for neuroendocrine differentiation in Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), we aimed to determine neuroendocrine expression in a large series of genetically-confirmed ESFT and its prognostic significance in clinically-localised neoplasms (n = 176). Slides prepared from tissue microarrays were stained for Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), CD56, chromogranin-A and synaptophysin. INSM1 expression was present in 59% of ESFT, while synaptophysin, chromogranin-A and CD56 were expressed in only 13%, 8% and 5% of ESFT, respectively. Histological subtypes were only significantly correlated with INSM1 (p = 0.032) or CD56 (p = 0.016) immunoexpression. Regarding prognosis, no significant association was found between INSM1, synaptophysin or chromogranin-A immunoexpression and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Despite the low proportion of tumors with CD56 immunoreactivity, CD56 expression was shown to correlate with both poor PFS (p < 0.001) and poor OS (p < 0.001) in the present series. In conclusion, neuroendocrine differentiation is often present in ESFT, and in the present study INSM1 expression in particular was found to be higher than previously described in Ewing's tumors. Nevertheless, this finding does not distinguish these tumors from other round cell tumors that may show focal or diffuse neuroendocrine differentiation. CD56 expression could be used as a prognostic factor in ESFT, although given the results herein obtained, we recommend a prospective validation in independent series including localized and disseminated tumors in ESFT.

Nuclear Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 Expression as a Marker of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Neoplasms of the Breast.

Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM1), a transcription factor encoded by the insulinoma associated-1 gene, is a second-generation biomarker of neuroendocrine differentiation. Its sensitivity and specificity in comparison with chromogranin-A and synaptophysin have been extensively validated in several organs, but evidence regarding its expression in mammary neoplasms is limited. In this study, INSM1 immunohistochemistry was validated in a cohort of 22 mammary neoplasms, enriched with special type breast carcinomas with known neuroendocrine differentiation as determined by immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin and chromogranin-A. Subsequently, INSM1 expression was evaluated in a consecutive series of 66 invasive breast cancer biopsies. In the validation cohort, 14 tumors were synaptophysin-positive, of which all but one showed INSM1 immunoreactivity. Eight tumors were synaptophysin-negative, of which 3 showed focal nuclear INSM1 expression. Six tumors were chromogranin-A-positive, of which one was INSM1-negative. When compared with synaptophysin, INSM1 seems more sensitive but less specific than chromogranin-A. In the biopsy cohort, only one invasive carcinoma of no special type showed substantial INSM1 immunoreactivity (ie, 25% of the tumor cells). Three more cases showed 1% nuclear INSM1 staining. We conclude that neuroendocrine differentiation in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type is a rare finding. Immunohistochemical biomarkers, comprising INSM1 as well as the first-generation biomarkers chromogranin-A and synaptophysin, are useful to distinguish neuroendocrine differentiation in breast neoplasms. The identification of neuroendocrine differentiation can be helpful to establish the diagnosis of special type breast carcinomas such as solid papillary carcinoma.

INSM1 Is Less Sensitive But More Specific Than Synaptophysin in Gynecologic High-grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a promising diagnostic marker for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs); however, it is controversial whether INSM1 is more sensitive than conventional markers chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56. Here, we investigated immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 in 75 gynecologic HGNECs using full tissue sections (30 small-cell carcinomas [SmCCs], 34 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas [LCNECs], and 11 mixed SmCC and LCNEC), with specificity analysis in 422 gynecologic non-neuroendocrine tumors (410 in tissue microarrays and 12 full sections) and comparison with conventional neuroendocrine markers for their sensitivity and specificity. Positive INSM1 staining was seen in 69 (92%) HGNECs, whereas chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 staining was seen in 61 (81%), 72 (96%), and 44 (69%) tumors, respectively (INSM1 vs. chromogranin, P=0.09; INSM1 vs. synaptophysin, P=0.4942; and INSM1 vs. CD56, P&lt;0.001). The mean percentage of INSM1-positive tumor cells was 54% (median: 60%, range: 0% to 100%), similar to chromogranin (58%, P=0.2903) and higher than CD56 (30%, P=0.00001) but significantly lower than synaptophysin (89%, P&lt;0.00001). INSM1 showed no staining difference among SmCCs, LCNECs, and mixed SmCC-LCNECs. Among the 422 non-neuroendocrine tumors, positive staining was seen in 5% tumors for INSM1, 18% for chromogranin, 19% for synaptophysin, and 25% for CD56. Our study indicates that INSM1 is a highly specific marker (95% specificity) for gynecologic HGNECs with high sensitivity (92%), but it is less sensitive than synaptophysin (96% sensitivity). INSM1 is more specific than chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 for gynecologic HGNECs. Our literature review reveals that INSM1 has consistently (the same antibody clone A8 used for all reported studies) shown higher or similar sensitivity to chromogranin (for all 3 chromogranin antibody clones LK2H10, DAK-A3, DAKO polyclonal); however, whether INSM1 is more or less sensitive than synaptophysin or CD56 for HGNECs is highly dependent on the antibody clones used for synaptophysin (clones MRQ-40 and SNP88 showing higher sensitivity than clones 27G12 and DAK-SYNAP) or CD56 (clones CD564, MRQ-42, and MRQ-54 showing higher sensitivity than clones 123C3D5, 1B6, and Leu243).

INSM1 Expression in Angiosarcoma.

Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers has been reported in angiosarcomas and can occasionally result in diagnostic confusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), a marker for neuroendocrine differentiation, in angiosarcomas as well as other sarcomas. Tissue microarrays, including angiosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), clear cell sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, were evaluated for expression of INSM1. The extent of immunoreactivity was graded according to the percentage of positive tumor cell nuclei (0, no staining; 1+, <5%; 2+, 5%-25%; 3+, 26%-50%; 4+, 51%-75%; and 5+, 76%-100%), and the intensity of staining was graded as weak, moderate, or strong. INSM1 expression was found in a subset of angiosarcomas (n = 24/94, 26%; majority 5+, weak to moderate), as well as DSRCTs (n = 7/62, 11%; 2+, weak to strong) and rarely synovial sarcomas (n = 3/76, 4%; 2+, moderate to strong). No INSM1 expression was detected in the other sarcomas. Aberrant expression of INSM1 can be seen in a subset of angiosarcomas often with diffuse labeling. Other sarcomas that can rarely demonstrate small cell morphology and focal INSM1 expression include DSRCT and synovial sarcoma.