Generation Of Express Saccades Research Articles

Impairment but not abolishment of express saccades after unilateral or bilateral inactivation of the frontal eye fields.

Express saccades are a manifestation of a visual grasp reflex triggered when visual information arrives in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SCi), which in turn orchestrates the lower level brainstem saccade generator to evoke a saccade with a very short latency (~100 ms or less). A prominent theory regarding express saccades generation is that they are facilitated by preparatory signals, presumably from cortical areas, which prime the SCi before the arrival of visual information. Here, we test this theory by reversibly inactivating a key cortical input to the SCi, the frontal eye fields (FEF), while monkeys perform an oculomotor task that promotes express saccades. Across three tasks with a different combination of potential target locations and unilateral or bilateral FEF inactivation, we found a spared ability for monkeys to generate express saccades, despite decreases in express saccade frequency during FEF inactivation. This result is consistent with the FEF having a facilitatory but not critical role in express saccade generation, likely because other cortical areas compensate for the loss of preparatory input to the SCi. However, we also found decreases in the accuracy and peak velocity of express saccades generated during FEF inactivation, which argues for an influence of the FEF on the saccadic burst generator even during express saccades. Overall, our results shed further light on the role of the FEF in the shortest-latency visually-guided eye movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Express saccades are the shortest-latency saccade. The frontal eye fields (FEF) are thought to promote express saccades by presetting the superior colliculus. Here, by reversibly inactivating the FEF either unilaterally or bilaterally via cortical cooling, we support this by showing that the FEF plays a facilitative but not critical role in express saccade generation. We also found that FEF inactivation lowered express saccade peak velocity, emphasizing a contribution of the FEF to express saccade kinematics.

Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.

Express saccades have very short latencies and are often considered a special population of saccadic eye movements. Recent evidence suggests that express saccade generation in humans increases with training, and that this training is independent of the actual saccade vector being trained. We assessed the time course of these training-induced increases in express saccade generation and how they differ between the nasal and temporal hemifields, and second whether they transfer from the trained to the untrained eye. We also measured the effects of training on saccade latencies more generally, and upon peak velocities. The training effect transferred between the nasal and temporal hemifields and between the trained and untrained eyes. More surprisingly, we found an asymmetric effect of training on express saccade proportions: Before training, express saccade proportions were higher for saccades made into the nasal hemifield but with training this reversed. This training-induced asymmetry was also observed in overall saccade latencies, showing how training can unmask nasal/temporal asymmetries in saccade latencies. Finally, we report for the first time that saccadic peak velocities increased with training, independently of changes in amplitude.

Saccade latency bias toward temporal hemifield: Evidence for role of retinotectal tract in mediating reflexive saccades

The superior colliculus (SC) plays a critical role in mediating reflexive eye movements. Under optimal conditions, for example including a temporal ‘gap’ of 200 ms after fixation offset and prior to target onset, it is possible to isolate a population of ‘express saccades' with very short latencies between 80 and 120 ms. Ablation of the SC abolishes express saccades in monkeys. However, it remains to be established whether express saccade generation is dependent upon visual afferents transmitting direct retinal projections to SC via the retinotectal tract (RTT). In nineteen healthy human participants, we used a gap paradigm to investigate whether express saccades demonstrate shorter latencies to targets in the temporal hemifield, a marker for RTT function. A population of predominantly reflexive saccades (with latencies between 70 and 150 ms) was isolated in which latencies toward temporal hemifield targets were shown to be shorter than toward nasal hemifield targets. The advantages for reflexive saccades toward temporal hemifield targets suggest that visual efferents from the retina to the superior colliculus contribute to generating reflexively triggered saccades.

Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.

Express saccades represent the fastest possible eye movements to visual targets with reaction times that approach minimum sensory-motor conduction delays. Previous work in monkeys has identified two specific neural signals in the superior colliculus (SC: a midbrain sensorimotor integration structure involved in gaze control) that are required to execute express saccades: 1) previsual activity consisting of a low-frequency increase in action potentials in sensory-motor neurons immediately before the arrival of a visual response; and 2) a transient visual-sensory response consisting of a high-frequency burst of action potentials in visually responsive neurons resulting from the appearance of a visual target stimulus. To better understand how these two neural signals interact to produce express saccades, we manipulated the arrival time and magnitude of visual responses in the SC by altering target luminance and we examined the corresponding influences on SC activity and express saccade generation. We recorded from saccade neurons with visual-, motor-, and previsual-related activity in the SC of monkeys performing the gap saccade task while target luminance was systematically varied between 0.001 and 42.5 cd/m(2) against a black background (∼0.0001 cd/m(2)). Our results demonstrated that 1) express saccade latencies were linked directly to the arrival time in the SC of visual responses produced by abruptly appearing visual stimuli; 2) express saccades were generated toward both dim and bright targets whenever sufficient previsual activity was present; and 3) target luminance altered the likelihood of producing an express saccade. When an express saccade was generated, visuomotor neurons increased their activity immediately before the arrival of the visual response in the SC and saccade initiation. Furthermore, the visual and motor responses of visuomotor neurons merged into a single burst of action potentials, while the visual response of visual-only neurons was unaffected. A linear combination model was used to test which SC signals best predicted the likelihood of producing an express saccade. In addition to visual response magnitude and previsual activity of saccade neurons, the model identified presaccadic activity (activity occurring during the 30-ms epoch immediately before saccade initiation) as a third important signal for predicting express saccades. We conclude that express saccades can be predicted by visual, previsual, and presaccadic signals recorded from visuomotor neurons in the intermediate layers of the SC.

Parietal Cortical Neuronal Activity Is Selective for Express Saccades

Saccadic eye movements are central to primate behavior and serve to move the eyes to visual objects of interest. Express saccades, unlike regular saccades, occur with very short reaction times, a behavior necessary for speeded reactions in goal-directed behavior. Previous studies have shown that introduction of a blank interval (gap) between the fixation point offset and the saccadic target onset leads to an increase in the number of express saccades and that the superior colliculus plays a crucial role in the generation of express saccades. A longstanding hypothesis asserted that express saccades are mediated largely by a subcortical circuit, circumventing extrastriate visual cortex. An alternative "posterior pathway" hypothesis proposed the involvement of posterior parietal cortex. In the present study, using a gap saccade task, we investigated the role of nonhuman primate's lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) in generation of express saccades. We show that roughly half of recorded LIP neurons were modulated during the gap interval. Moreover, a group of neurons with persistent activity in a memory-guided saccade task enhanced their activity during express saccades relative to that during regular saccades. After reducing the target's certainty by increasing the potential target locations, neuronal activity remained in the similar level during express saccades but markedly reduced during regular saccades that correlated with the increase of saccadic reaction time in the regular saccade. Our results suggest that area LIP is directly involved in generating saccades in express mode.

Visual and auditory cue integration for the generation of saccadic eye movements in monkeys and lever pressing in humans

This study examined how effectively visual and auditory cues can be integrated in the brain for the generation of motor responses. The latencies with which saccadic eye movements are produced in humans and monkeys form, under certain conditions, a bimodal distribution, the first mode of which has been termed express saccades. In humans, a much higher percentage of express saccades is generated when both visual and auditory cues are provided compared with the single presentation of these cues [H. C. Hughes et al. (1994) J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 20, 131-153]. In this study, we addressed two questions: first, do monkeys also integrate visual and auditory cues for express saccade generation as do humans and second, does such integration take place in humans when, instead of eye movements, the task is to press levers with fingers? Our results show that (i) in monkeys, as in humans, the combined visual and auditory cues generate a much higher percentage of express saccades than do singly presented cues and (ii) the latencies with which levers are pressed by humans are shorter when both visual and auditory cues are provided compared with the presentation of single cues, but the distribution in all cases is unimodal; response latencies in the express range seen in the execution of saccadic eye movements are not obtained with lever pressing.

The integration of visual and auditory cues for express saccade generation

The integration of visual and auditory cues for express saccade generation

Express saccades: the conditions under which they are realized and the brain structures involved

Repeated eye movements made to visual targets can yield a bimodal distribution of saccadic latencies the first mode of which was termed express saccades by Fischer and Boch. We have carried out a series of experiments in monkeys to identify the conditions necessary for express saccade generation, the rules involved, and the brain structures responsible. Express saccades are produced to singly appearing targets but not when several stimuli appear at the same time. Learning plays a central role in express saccade generation. What is learned is the vector of the saccade to be produced, not the location of the target is space or the orbital position of the eye. The frequency with which express saccades are made depends on expectation; express saccades seldom arise when targets appear at unexpected locations. Increasing the gap time between fixation spot termination and target onset and decreasing the number of expected target locations increases the frequency of express saccade generation. Express saccades are made with high frequency to the second of two successive targets as long as the vector is one that has been learned. Pre-cuing can increase the frequency of express saccades only within a limited range. Free viewing of natural scenes commonly yields saccades in the express range but the distribution is not bimodal. Lesions of the frontal eye fields, of the medial eye fields, and of areas V4 and MT do not interfere with the generation of express saccades. Neither does the disruption of either the magnocellular or parvocellular systems. But superior colliculus lesions eliminate express saccades; no recovery is evident It appears therefore that the cortical areas involved in express saccade generation send their signals to the brainstem through the superior colliculus.

Identifying sites of saccade amplitude plasticity in humans: transfer of adaptation between different types of saccade

To view different objects of interest, primates use fast, accurate eye movements called saccades. If saccades become inaccurate, the brain adjusts their amplitudes so they again land on target, a process known as saccade adaptation. The different types of saccades elicited in different behavioral circumstances appear to utilize different parts of the oculomotor circuitry. To gain insight into where adaptation occurs in different saccade pathways, we adapted saccades of one type and examined how that adaptation affected or transferred to saccades of a different type. If adaptation of one type of saccade causes a substantial change in the amplitude of another, that adaptation may occur at a site used in the generation of both types of saccade. Alternatively, if adaptation of one type of saccade transfers only partially, or not at all, to another, adaptation occurs at least in part at a location that is not common to the generation of both types of saccade. We produced significant amplitude reductions in memory-guided, delayed, targeting and express saccades by moving the target backward during the saccade. After memory-guided saccades were adapted, the amplitude of express, targeting and delayed saccades exhibited only a partial reduction. In contrast, when express, targeting, or delayed saccades were adapted, amplitude transfer to memory-guided saccades was more substantial. These results, combined with previously published data, suggest that there are at least two sites of adaptation within the saccadic system. One is used communally in the generation of express, targeting, delayed and memory-guided saccades, whereas the other is specific for the generation of memory-guided saccades.

Inhibitory control and spatial working memory: A saccadic eye movement study of negative symptoms in schizophrenia

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia are perhaps the most unremitting and burdensome features of the disorder. Negative symptoms have been associated with distinct motor, cognitive and neuropathological impairments, possibly stemming from prefrontal dysfunction. Eye movement paradigms can be used to investigate basic sensorimotor functions, as well as higher order cognitive aspects of motor control such as inhibition and spatial working memory — functions subserved by the prefrontal cortex. This study investigated inhibitory control and spatial working memory in the saccadic system of 21 patients with schizophrenia (10 with high negative symptoms scores and 11 with low negative symptom scores) and 14 healthy controls. Tasks explored suppression of reflexive saccades during qualitatively different tasks, the generation of express and anticipatory saccades, and the ability to respond to occasional, unpredictable (“oddball”) targets that occurred during a sequence of well-learned, reciprocating saccades between horizontal targets. Spatial working memory was assessed using a single and a two-step memory-guided task (involving a visually-guided saccade during the delay period). Results indicated significant increases in response suppression errors, as well as increased response selection impairments, during the oddball task, in schizophrenia patients with prominent negative symptoms. The variability of memory-guided saccade accuracy was also increased in patients with prominent negative symptom scores. Collectively, these findings provide further support for the proposed association between prefrontal dysfunction and negative symptoms.

Inhibitory control and spatial working memory in Parkinson's disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have difficulty performing tasks relying on inhibitory control and working memory, functions of the prefrontal cortex. Eye movement paradigms can be used to investigate basic sensorimotor functions and higher order cognitive aspects of motor control. This study investigated inhibitory control and spatial working memory in the saccadic system of 13 individuals with mild-moderate PD and 13 age-matched controls. Tasks explored suppression of reflexive saccades during qualitatively different tasks, generation of express and anticipatory saccades, and the ability to respond to occasional, unpredictable ("oddball") targets that occurred during a sequence of well-learned, reciprocating saccades between horizontal targets. Spatial working memory was assessed using single and two-step (involving a visually guided saccade during the delay period) memory-guided tasks. Results for the PD group indicated an increased percentage of response selection errors during an oddball task, reduced suppression of inappropriate reflexive saccades during memory-guided tasks (but not during fixation or saccade-engagement tasks), and an increased percentage of express and anticipatory saccades. Spatial working memory was preserved in the PD group during single and two-step memory-guided tasks. These findings are consistent with dysfunction within fronto-striatal and prefrontal-collicular pathways influencing suppression and selection of eye movements.

What is the coordinate frame utilized for the generation of express saccades in monkeys?

The latencies of saccades to suddenly appearing eccentric targets can have a bimodal distribution, with an early, express peak, and a late, regular peak (Fischer and Boch 1983, Brain Res 260: 21-26). Express saccades usually are a product of learning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this learning is specific to the relative position of the target in space, the orbital position of the eye, or the vector of the saccade to be produced. Further, it was asked whether and how the frequency with which express saccades are generated is influenced by the immediately preceding saccadic vector and the familiarity of the targets. To this end, rhesus monkeys were trained to make saccadic eye movements to single targets and to two sequential targets that appeared at various positions relative to the head, relative to the initial fixation spot and relative to each other. The results show that the frequency with which express saccades are generated is determined by the saccadic vector that has to be generated and not by the relative position of a target in space, the orbital position of the eye, the immediately preceding saccadic vector, or the familiarity of the targets.

An examination of the variables that affect express saccade generation.

The frequency with which express saccades are generated under a variety of conditions in rhesus monkeys was examined. Increasing the gap time between fixation spot termination and target onset increased express saccade frequency but was progressively less effective in doing so as the number of target positions in the sample was increased. Express saccades were rarely produced when two targets were presented simultaneously and the choice of either of which was rewarded; a temporal asynchrony of only 17 ms between the targets reinstated express saccade generation. Express saccades continued to be generated when the vergence or pursuit systems was coactivated with the saccadic system.

Contribution of the primate prefrontal cortex to the gap effect

The introduction of a brief temporal gap between the disappearance of the initial fixation point and the presentation of a peripheral target leads to a general reduction in saccadic reaction times (SRTs), known as the gap effect. Moreover, extremely short latency express saccades frequently occur in this paradigm. Disorders of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are often associated with increased numbers of express saccades and an inability to suppress reflexive saccades. To investigate the role of the PFC in the gap effect and in express saccade generation, we trained two rhesus monkeys on a gap saccade task in which the initial fixation point (FP) disappeared 200 ms or 600 ms before a peripheral stimulus appeared either 8 degrees to its left or right side. We recorded from the lateral PFC (areas 8 Ar and 46) in both monkeys the activity of 214 neurons, 84 (39%) of which exhibited task-related activity. These neurons could be further categorized into separate groups based on their discharge behaviour: fixation neurons with a decrease in activity during the gap (27%), FP offset neurons (12%), preparatory neurons with an increase in activity during the gap (30%), visual neurons (6%), post-saccadic neurons (8%), and reward-related neurons (12%). There were no obvious differences in the topography of these groups. Significant differences between express and regular saccade trials were found for fixation-related neurons. These neurons had a lower activity during the gap prior to the generation of contralateral express saccades. We hypothesize that a reduction in the activity of fixation-related neurons in the PFC may contribute to the elevated rate of express saccades in prefrontal disorders.

A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus.

Significant advances in cognitive neuroscience can be achieved by combining techniques used to measure behavior and brain activity with neural modeling. Here we apply this approach to the initiation of rapid eye movements (saccades), which are used to redirect the visual axis to targets of interest. It is well known that the superior colliculus (SC) in the midbrain plays a major role in generating saccadic eye movements, and physiological studies have provided important knowledge of the activity pattern of neurons in this structure. Based on the observation that the SC receives localized sensory (exogenous) and voluntary (endogenous) inputs, our model assumes that this information is integrated by dynamic competition across local collicular interactions. The model accounts well for the effects upon saccadic reaction time (SRT) due to removal of fixation, the presence of distractors, execution of pro- versus antisaccades, and variation in target probability, and suggests a possible mechanism for the generation of express saccades. In each of these cases, the activity patterns of "neurons" within the model closely resemble actual cell behavior in the intermediate layer of the SC. The interaction structure we employ is instrumental for producing a physiologically faithful model and results in new insights and hypotheses regarding the neural mechanisms underlying saccade initiation.

The role of fixation point and subjects' readiness in the occurrence of express saccades as revealed by the self-initiation paradigm.

The role of fixation and the subjects' response preparedness in producing express saccades were explored in seven human subjects. The occurrence frequencies of the express saccades were compared in the overlap (continuous presentation of fixation point), gap (fixation point offset 0-400 ms prior to target onset) and no-fixation tasks under the conventional and self-initiation paradigms. In the latter paradigm, the subjects, when ready, touched a sensor in order to ignite the target lamp with a delay time of 0-400 ms (target onset delay time). Therefore, the subjects' response preparedness might be expected to be higher than that in the normal paradigm and equated in each subject at the time when the subjects touched a sensor regardless of the paradigms. Although express saccades were produced neither in the normal overlap nor in the normal no-fixation tasks, they could be produced at the rate of 24 and 48% in the overlap and no-fixation tasks under the self-initiation paradigm, respectively. The highest occurrence frequency of express saccades was obtained when the gap paradigm was combined with the self-initiation paradigm with a delay time of 100 ms (62%). The value was higher by 20% than in the normal gap task. At a target onset delay time of 0 ms under the self-initiation paradigm, the occurrence frequency of express saccades was higher in the overlap task than in the gap task. These results suggest that the subjects' response preparedness has a potentiality to produce express saccades without fixation point offset and that fixation point offset at the same time of the target stimulus onset has an interference, rather than facilitatory, influence on the generation of express saccades.

Contextual factors in the generation of express and regular saccades

Experiments using a modified gap paradigm, where regular trials are intermingled with catch trials (trials without saccade target), demonstrate that the relative frequency of express versus regular saccades distinctly depends on catch trial frequency. More specifically, it has been shown that the probability of an express saccade depends stochastically on the type of the preceding trial, that is, on the sequence of stimuli. We discuss whether such contextual effects can be accommodated within the framework of Findlay & Walker's model.

Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.

Experiments on visual attention have employed both physical cues and verbal instructions to enable subjects to allocate attention at a location that becomes relevant within a perceptual or motor task some time later (cue lead time, CLT). In this study we have used valid visual peripheral cues (CLT between 100 and 700 ms) to indicate the direction and location of the next saccade. A cue is considered valid or invalid if its meaning with respect to the next saccade is correct or incorrect. A cue is called an anti- or pro-cue if the side of its presentation is opposite to or the same as the direction of the saccade required on a given trial. Correspondingly, a saccade is called an anti- or pro-saccade if it is directed to the side opposite to or the same as the stimulus presentation. A condition in which the cue and the stimulus are presented on opposite sides provides a simple way of dissociating voluntary attention allocation from automatic orienting. This paper considers the anti-cue pro-saccade task: the subjects were instructed to use the cue to direct attention to the opposite side, i.e. the location, where on valid trials the saccade target would occur. In the companion paper we have used the same physical condition, but we have reversed the instructions as to saccade direction and we have reversed the meaning of the cue, i.e. we designed a pro-cue anti-saccade task. In this first paper, the saccadic reaction times (SRTs) of pro-saccades of five adult subjects were measured in the gap paradigm (fixation point offset precedes target onset by 200 ms). With a CLT of 100 ms, valid anti-cues reduced the number of express saccades (i.e. saccades with SRTs in the range 80-120 ms) significantly compared with the control values (no cues). Valid anti-cues with increasingly long CLTs (100-700 ms) resulted in an increasing incidence of anticipatory saccades and saccades with longer SRTs (more than 120 ms), while the frequency of express saccades remained below the control value. When cue and saccade target were dissociated in location or in both location and direction, the effects of the cueing revealed a much lower spatial selectivity as compared to the effects that have been described for voluntary attention allocation by means of central cues. The results suggest that voluntary allocation of attention and cue-induced automatic orienting not only have different time courses but also have opposite effects on the generation of express saccades, and different spatial selectivities. A possible neuronal basis of these results is discussed considering related findings from electrophysiological studies in monkeys.

Neuronal Activity in Monkey Superior Colliculus Related to the Initiation of Saccadic Eye Movements

The introduction of a temporal gap between the disappearance of an initially fixated target and the appearance of an eccentric saccadic target results in a general reduction of saccadic reaction times (SRTs)-the gap effect-and often in the production of express saccades, the latencies of which approach the conduction time of the shortest neural pathways from the retina to the eye muscles. We investigated saccade initiation by recording neuronal activity in the superior colliculus in monkeys performing the gap paradigm. Fixation-related neurons reduced their discharge rate during the gap period, regardless of the SRT. This reduction in activity is consistent with the hypothesized release of ocular fixation that facilitates premotor processes and may contribute to the gap effect. In addition to saccade-related discharges, many saccade-related neurons displayed phasic target-related responses and/or low-frequency preparatory activity during the gap period. The level of this preparatory activity correlated with both SRT and express saccade occurrence when the saccade was made into the response field of the neuron. Evidence indicates that advanced motor preparation is required for express saccade generation, which may be subserved by specific increases in the preparatory activity of saccade-related neurons. Increased preparatory activity may allow the target-related responses to trigger short-latency express saccades directly. This study provides insights into the functional mechanism of saccade initiation and may be relevant to the generation of all voluntary motor responses.

Manipulating the disengage operation of covert visual spatial attention.

Processes of covert visual spatial attention have been closely linked to the programming of saccadic eye movements. In particular, it has been hypothesized that the reduction in saccadic latency that occurs in the gap paradigm is due to the prior disengagement of covert visual spatial attention. This explanation has received considerable criticism. No study as yet as attempted to demonstrate a facilitation of the disengagement of attention from a covertly attended object. If such facilitation were possible, it would support the hypothesis that the predisengagement of covert attention is necessary for the generation of express saccades. In two experiments using covert orienting of visual attention tasks (COVAT), with a high probability that targets would appear contralateral to the cued location, we attempted to facilitate the disengagement of covert attention by extinguishing peripheral cues prior to the appearance of targets. We hypothesized that the gap between cue offset and target onset would facilitate disengagement of attention from a covertly attended object. For both experiments, responses to targets appearing after a gap were slower than were responses in the no-gap condition. These results suggest that the prior offset of a covertly attended object does not facilitate the disengagement of attention.