Calculus Of Explicit Substitutions Research Articles

(Leftmost-Outermost) Beta Reduction is Invariant, Indeed

Slot and van Emde Boas' weak invariance thesis states that reasonable machines can simulate each other within a polynomially overhead in time. Is lambda-calculus a reasonable machine? Is there a way to measure the computational complexity of a lambda-term? This paper presents the first complete positive answer to this long-standing problem. Moreover, our answer is completely machine-independent and based over a standard notion in the theory of lambda-calculus: the length of a leftmost-outermost derivation to normal form is an invariant cost model. Such a theorem cannot be proved by directly relating lambda-calculus with Turing machines or random access machines, because of the size explosion problem: there are terms that in a linear number of steps produce an exponentially long output. The first step towards the solution is to shift to a notion of evaluation for which the length and the size of the output are linearly related. This is done by adopting the linear substitution calculus (LSC), a calculus of explicit substitutions modeled after linear logic proof nets and admitting a decomposition of leftmost-outermost derivations with the desired property. Thus, the LSC is invariant with respect to, say, random access machines. The second step is to show that LSC is invariant with respect to the lambda-calculus. The size explosion problem seems to imply that this is not possible: having the same notions of normal form, evaluation in the LSC is exponentially longer than in the lambda-calculus. We solve such an impasse by introducing a new form of shared normal form and shared reduction, deemed useful. Useful evaluation avoids those steps that only unshare the output without contributing to beta-redexes, i.e. the steps that cause the blow-up in size. The main technical contribution of the paper is indeed the definition of useful reductions and the thorough analysis of their properties.

Explicit substitution calculi with de Bruijn indices and intersection type systems

Explicit substitution calculi with de Bruijn indices and intersection type systems

A Flexible Framework for Visualisation of Computational Properties of General Explicit Substitutions Calculi

SUBSEXPL is a system originally developed to visualise reductions, simplifications and normalisations in three important calculi of explicit substitutions and has been applied to understand and explain properties of these calculi and to compare the different styles of making explicit the substitution operation in implementations of the λ-calculus in de Bruijn notation. The system was developed in OCaml and now it can be executed inside the Emacs editor within a new mode which allows a very easy interaction. The use of special symbols makes its application very useful for students because the notation on the screen is as close as possible to that on the paper. In addition to dealing the λ-calculus and explicit substitutions calculi in de Bruijn notation, now it is possible to work with the λ-calculus and with several calculi of explicit substitutions using also representation of variables with names. Moreover, in contrast to the original version of the system, that was restricted to three specific calculi of explicit substitution, the new version allows the inclusion of new calculi by giving as input their grammatical descriptions. SUBSEXPL has been used with success for teaching basic properties of the λ-calculus and for illustrating the computational impact of selecting one kind of representation of variables (either names or indices) and a specific style of making explicit substitutions in real implementations based on the λ-calculus.

Swapping: a natural bridge between named and indexed explicit substitution calculi

This article is devoted to the presentation of lambda_rex, an explicit substitution calculus with de Bruijn indexes and a simple notation. By being isomorphic to lambda_ex - a recent formalism with variable names -, lambda_rex accomplishes simulation of beta-reduction (Sim), preservation of beta-strong normalization (PSN) and meta-confluence (MC), among other desirable properties. Our calculus is based on a novel presentation of lambda_dB, using a swap notion that was originally devised by de Bruijn. Besides lambda_rex, two other indexed calculi isomorphic to lambda_x and lambda_xgc are presented, demonstrating the potential of our technique when applied to the design of indexed versions of known named calculi.

Explicit Substitutions for Contextual Type Theory

In this paper, we present an explicit substitution calculus which distinguishes between ordinary bound variables and meta-variables. Its typing discipline is derived from contextual modal type theory. We first present a dependently typed lambda calculus with explicit substitutions for ordinary variables and explicit meta-substitutions for meta-variables. We then present a weak head normalization procedure which performs both substitutions lazily and in a single pass thereby combining substitution walks for the two different classes of variables. Finally, we describe a bidirectional type checking algorithm which uses weak head normalization and prove soundness.

Labelled Lambda-calculi with Explicit Copy and Erase

We present two rewriting systems that define labelled explicit substitution lambda-calculi. Our work is motivated by the close correspondence between Levy's labelled lambda-calculus and paths in proof-nets, which played an important role in the understanding of the Geometry of Interaction. The structure of the labels in Levy's labelled lambda-calculus relates to the multiplicative information of paths; the novelty of our work is that we design labelled explicit substitution calculi that also keep track of exponential information present in call-by-value and call-by-name translations of the lambda-calculus into linear logic proof-nets.

Principal Typings in a Restricted Intersection Type System for Beta Normal Forms with De Bruijn Indices

The lambda-calculus with de Bruijn indices assembles each alpha-class of lambda-terms in a unique term, using indices instead of variable names. Intersection types provide finitary type polymorphism and can characterise normalisable lambda-terms through the property that a term is normalisable if and only if it is typeable. To be closer to computations and to simplify the formalisation of the atomic operations involved in beta-contractions, several calculi of explicit substitution were developed mostly with de Bruijn indices. Versions of explicit substitutions calculi without types and with simple type systems are well investigated in contrast to versions with more elaborate type systems such as intersection types. In previous work, we introduced a de Bruijn version of the lambda-calculus with an intersection type system and proved that it preserves subject reduction, a basic property of type systems. In this paper a version with de Bruijn indices of an intersection type system originally introduced to characterise principal typings for beta-normal forms is presented. We present the characterisation in this new system and the corresponding versions for the type inference and the reconstruction of normal forms from principal typings algorithms. We briefly discuss the failure of the subject reduction property and some possible solutions for it.

A Rational Deconstruction of Landin's SECD Machine with the J Operator

Landin's SECD machine was the first abstract machine for applicative expressions, i.e., functional programs. Landin's J operator was the first control operator for functional languages, and was specified by an extension of the SECD machine. We present a family of evaluation functions corresponding to this extension of the SECD machine, using a series of elementary transformations (transformation into continu-ation-passing style (CPS) and defunctionalization, chiefly) and their left inverses (transformation into direct style and refunctionalization). To this end, we modernize the SECD machine into a bisimilar one that operates in lockstep with the original one but that (1) does not use a data stack and (2) uses the caller-save rather than the callee-save convention for environments. We also identify that the dump component of the SECD machine is managed in a callee-save way. The caller-save counterpart of the modernized SECD machine precisely corresponds to Thielecke's double-barrelled continuations and to Felleisen's encoding of J in terms of call/cc. We then variously characterize the J operator in terms of CPS and in terms of delimited-control operators in the CPS hierarchy. As a byproduct, we also present several reduction semantics for applicative expressions with the J operator, based on Curien's original calculus of explicit substitutions. These reduction semantics mechanically correspond to the modernized versions of the SECD machine and to the best of our knowledge, they provide the first syntactic theories of applicative expressions with the J operator.

A syntactic correspondence between context-sensitive calculi and abstract machines

We present a systematic construction of environment-based abstract machines from context-sensitive calculi of explicit substitutions, and we illustrate it with ten calculi and machines for applicative order with an abort operation, normal order with generalized reduction and call/cc, the lambda-mu-calculus, delimited continuations, stack inspection, proper tail-recursion, and lazy evaluation. Most of the machines already exist but they have been obtained independently and are only indirectly related to the corresponding calculi. All of the calculi are new and they make it possible directly to reason about the execution of the corresponding machines.

A Syntactic Correspondence between Context-Sensitive Calculi and Abstract Machines

We present a systematic construction of environment-based abstract machines from context-sensitive calculi of explicit substitutions, and we illustrate it with ten calculi and machines for applicative order with an abort operation, normal order with generalized reduction and call/cc, the lambda-mu-calculus, delimited continuations, i/o, stack inspection, proper tail-recursion, and lazy evaluation. Most of the machines already exist but they have been obtained independently and are only indirectly related to the corresponding calculi. All of the calculi are new and they make it possible to directly reason about the execution of the corresponding machines.

A Rational Deconstruction of Landin's J Operator

Landin's J operator was the first control operator for functional languages. It was specified with an extension of the SECD machine, which was the first abstract machine for functional languages. We present a family of compositional evaluation functions corresponding to this extension of the SECD machine, using a series of elementary transformations (transformation into continuation-passing style (CPS) and defunctionalization, chiefly) and their left inverses (transformation into direct style and refunctionalization). To this end, we modernize the SECD machine into a bisimilar one that operates in lock step with the original one but that (1) does not use a data stack and (2) uses the caller-save rather than the callee-save convention for environments. We then characterize the J operator in terms of CPS and in terms of delimited-control operators in the CPS hierarchy. As a byproduct, we also present a reduction semantics for applicative expressions with the J operator, based on Curien's original calculus of explicit substitutions. This reduction semantics mechanically corresponds to the modernized version of the SECD machine and to the best of our knowledge, it provides the first syntactic theory of applicative expressions with the J operator.<br /> <br />The present work is concluded by a motivated wish to see Landin's name added to the list of co-discoverers of continuations. Methodologically, however, it mainly illustrates the value of Reynolds's defunctionalization and of refunctionalization as well as the expressive power of the CPS hierarchy (a) to account for the first control operator and the first abstract machine for functional languages and (b) to connect them to their successors.

SUBSEXPL: a tool for simulating and comparing explicit substitutions calculi ★

We present the system SUBSEXPL used for simulating and comparing explicit substitutions calculi. The system allows the manipulation of expressions of the λ-calculus and of three different styles of explicit substitutions: the λσ, the λse and the suspension calculus. A variation of the suspension calculus, which allows for combination of steps of β-contraction is included too. Implementations of the η-reduction are provided for each style. Other explicit substitutions calculi can be easily incorporated into the system due to its modular structure. The uses of the system include: the visualization of the contractions of the λ-calculus in de Bruijn notation, and of guided one-step reductions as well as normalization via each of the associated substitution calculi. Many useful facilities are included: reductions can be easily recorded as text files, LATEX outputs can be generated and several examples for dealing with arithmetic operations and computational operators such as conditionals and repetitions in the λ-calculus are available. The system can be executed over Emacs using the x-symbol mode in such a way that λ-terms and terms of the explicit substitutions calculi are represented in its natural syntax avoiding the necessity of repeatedly generating LATEX outputs. The system has been of great help for systematically comparing explicit substitutions calculi, as well as for understanding properties of explicit substitutions such as the Preservation of Strong Normalization. In addition, it has been used for teaching basic properties of the λ-calculus such as: computational adequacy, the usefulness of de Bruijn's notation and of making explicit substitutions in real implementations.

A Syntactic Correspondence between Context-Sensitive Calculi and Abstract Machines

We present a systematic construction of environment-based abstract machines from context-sensitive calculi of explicit substitutions, and we illustrate it with ten calculi and machines for applicative order with an abort operation, normal order with generalized reduction and call/cc, the lambda-mu-calculus, delimited continuations, stack inspection, proper tail-recursion, and lazy evaluation. Most of the machines already exist but have been obtained independently and are only indirectly related to the corresponding calculi. All of the calculi are new and they make it possible to directly reason about the execution of the corresponding machines.<br /> <br />In connection with the functional correspondence between evaluation functions and abstract machines initiated by Reynolds, the present syntactic correspondence makes it possible to construct reduction-free normalization functions out of reduction-based ones, which was an open problem in the area of normalization by evaluation.

A Syntactic Correspondence between Context-Sensitive Calculi and Abstract Machines

We present a systematic construction of environment-based abstract machines from context-sensitive calculi of explicit substitutions, and we illustrate it with a series of calculi and machines: Krivine's machine with call/cc, the lambda-mu-calculus, delimited continuations, i/o, stack inspection, proper tail-recursion, and lazy evaluation. Most of the machines already exist but have been obtained independently and are only indirectly related to the corresponding calculi. All of the calculi are new and they make it possible to directly reason about the execution of the corresponding machines. In connection with the functional correspondence between evaluation functions and abstract machines initiated by Reynolds, the present syntactic correspondence makes it possible to construct reduction-free normalization functions out of reduction-based ones, which was an open problem in the area of normalization by evaluation.

A Rewriting Calculus for Cyclic Higher-order Term Graphs

Introduced at the end of the nineties, the Rewriting Calculus (ρ-calculus, for short) is a simple calculus that fully integrates term-rewriting and λ-calculus. The rewrite rules, acting as elaborated abstractions, their application and the obtained structured results are first class objects of the calculus. The evaluation mechanism, generalizing beta-reduction, strongly relies on term matching in various theories.In this paper we propose an extension of the ρ-calculus, handling graph like structures rather than simple terms. The transformations are performed by explicit application of rewrite rules as first class entities. The possibility of expressing sharing and cycles allows one to represent and compute over regular infinite entities.The calculus over terms is naturally generalized by using unification constraints in addition to the standard ρ-calculus matching constraints. This therefore provides us with the basics for a natural extension of an explicit substitution calculus to term graphs. Several examples illustrating the introduced concepts are given.

Comparing and implementing calculi of explicit substitutions with eta-reduction

The past decade has seen an explosion of work on calculi of explicit substitutions. Numerous works have illustrated the usefulness of these calculi for practical notions like the implementation of typed functional programming languages and higher order proof assistants. It has also been shown that eta-reduction is useful for adapting substitution calculi for practical problems like higher order unification. This paper concentrates on rewrite rules for eta-reduction in three different styles of explicit substitution calculi: λ σ , λ s e and the suspension calculus. Both λ σ and λ s e when extended with eta-reduction rules, have proved useful for solving higher order unification. We enlarge the suspension calculus with an adequate eta-reduction rule which we show to preserve termination and confluence of the associated substitution calculus and to correspond to the eta rules of the other two calculi. We prove that λ σ and λ s e as well as λ σ and the suspension calculus are non-comparable while λ s e is more adequate than the suspension calculus in simulating one-step beta-reduction. After defining the eta-reduction rule in the suspension calculus, and after comparing these three calculi of explicit substitutions (all with an eta rule), we then concentrate on the implementation of the rewrite rules of eta-reduction in these calculi. We note that it is usual practice when implementing the eta rule for substitution calculi, to mix isolated applications of eta-reduction with the application of other rules of the corresponding substitution calculi. The main disadvantage of this practice is that the eta rewrite rules so obtained are unclean because they have an operational semantics different from that of the eta-reduction of the λ -calculus. For the three calculi in question enlarged with adequate eta rules we show how to implement these eta rules. For the λ s e we build a clean implementation of the eta rule and we prove that it is not possible to follow the same approach for the λ σ and λ susp .

Intersection types for explicit substitutions

We present a new system of intersection types for a composition-free calculus of explicit substitutions with a rule for garbage collection, and show that it characterizes those terms which are strongly normalizing. This system extends previous work on the natural generalization of the classical intersection types system, which characterized head normalization and weak normalization, but was not complete for strong normalization. An important role is played by the notion of available variable in a term, which is a generalization of the classical notion of free variable.

Explicit Substitutions à la de Bruijn: the local and global way

Kamareddine and Nederpelt[9], resp. Kamareddine and Ríos [11] gave two calculi of explicit of substitutions highly influenced by de Bruijn's notation of the λ-calculus. These calculi added to the explosive pool of work on explicit substitution in the past 15 years. As far as we know, calculi of explicit substitutions: a) are unable to handle local substitutions, and b) have answered (positively or negatively) the question of the termination of the underlying calculus of substitutions. The exception to a) is the calculus of [9] where substitution is handled both locally and globally. However, the calculus of [9] does not satisfy properties like confluence and termination. The exception to b) is the λse-calculus of [11] for which termination of the se-calculus, the underlying calculus of substitutions, remains unsolved. This paper has two aims: (i)To provide a calculus à la de Bruijn which deals with local substitution and whose underlying calculus of substitutions is terminating and confluent.(ii)To pose the problem of the termination of the substitution calculus of [11] in the hope that it can generate interest as a termination problem which at least for curiosity, needs to be settled. The answer here can go either way. On the one hand, although the λσ-calculus [1] does not preserve termination, the σ-calculus itself terminates. On the other hand, could the non-preservation of termination in the λse-calculus imply the non-termination of the se-calculus?

Reductions, intersection types, and explicit substitutions

This paper is part of a general programme of treating explicit substitutions as the primary λ-calculi from the point of view of foundations as well as applications. We work in a composition-free calculus of explicit substitutions and an augmented calculus obtained by adding explicit garbage-collection, and explore the relationship between intersection-types and reduction.We show that the terms that normalise by leftmost reduction and the terms that normalise by head reduction can each be characterised as the terms typable in a certain system. The relationship between typability and strong normalisation is subtly different from the classical case: we show that typable terms are strongly normalising but give a counterexample to the converse. Our notions of leftmost and head reduction are non-deterministic, and our normalisation theorems apply to any computations obeying these strategies. In this way we refine and strengthen the classical normalisation theorems. The proofs require some new techniques in the presence of reductions involving explicit substitutions. Indeed, our proofs do not rely on results from classical λ-calculus, which in our view is subordinate to the calculus of explicit substitution.

Formalizing Strong Normalization Proofs of Explicit Substitution Calculi in ALF

The past decade has given rise to a number of explicit substitution calculi. An important question of explicit substitution calculi is that of the termination of the underlying calculus of substitution. Proofs of termination of substitutions fall in two categories: those that are easy because a decreasing measure can be established and those that are difficult because such a decreasing measure is not easy to establish. This paper considers two styles of explicit substitution: σ and s, for which different termination proof methods apply. The termination of s is guaranteed by a decreasing weight, while a decreasing weight for showing the termination of σ has not yet been found. These termination methods for σ and s are formalized in the proof checker ALF. During our process of formally checking the termination of σ and s we comment on what is needed to make a proof formally checkable.