HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 103, No. 10Pathways of Proliferation Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBPathways of ProliferationNew Targets to Inhibit the Growth of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Glenn Marsboom and Stephen L. Archer Glenn MarsboomGlenn Marsboom From the Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Ill. Search for more papers by this author and Stephen L. ArcherStephen L. Archer From the Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Ill. Search for more papers by this author Originally published7 Nov 2008https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.188003Circulation Research. 2008;103:1047–1049Excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) contributes to the pathogenesis of many cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). VSMC proliferation also underlies the failure of many therapies, notable examples being restenosis following coronary angioplasty, vein graft failure in patients with coronary artery bypass grafts, and transplant vasculopathy. Few therapies directly target excess VSMC proliferation, in part, because the underlying pathways have been unknown. Recently, several pathways of VSMC proliferation have been defined, and new therapeutic targets have emerged.An example of the power of preventing VSMC proliferation in reducing human cardiovascular disease is the rapamycin (sirolimus)-coated coronary stent. After dozens of agents failed to prevent the 30% restenosis rate postangioplasty, this VSMC proliferation inhibitor reduced the number to ≈6%.1 However, rapamycin has toxicities, limiting its systemic use. Moreover, the mechanisms of accelerated VSMC proliferation may vary by disease, and, thus, the efficacy of an antiproliferative drug will likely be contextual (ie, disease dependent). Understanding the pathways controlling proliferation offers hope for identifying drugs that selectively target proliferating cells. The contribution by Gizard et al in this issue of Circulation Research identifies such a pathway and suggests new therapeutic targets.2Members of this group expand on their previous work showing that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α activation suppresses G1→S cell cycle progression by increasing the expression of the cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p16INK4a.3The present study is built on a solid body of knowledge of the cell cycle. Although growth factors are necessary to initiate proliferation in normal cells, cells become independent of these external stimuli during the G1 phase. This “point of no return” is highly regulated by the interaction among cyclins, CDKs, and CDK inhibitors.4 In nonproliferating cells, the retinoblastoma (Rb) proteins (pRB, p107, and p130) bind to E2F transcription factors and inhibit transcription.2 During proliferation, CDK–cyclin complexes phosphorylate Rb proteins, allowing release of E2F and transcription commences. However, another group of molecules, the CDK inhibitors (p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and p27KIP1) can block this transcription of S-phase genes, offering further opportunity for inhibiting proliferation.Gizard et al2 provide a new understanding of the transcriptional regulation underlying proliferation, demonstrating the interaction of the CDK pathway and telomerase. Telomeres are the DNA TTAGGG repeat sequences that cap and stabilize chromosomes. Traditionally thought to fend off senescence, it appears increasingly likely that they also regulate cell proliferation. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) is the catalytic factor that leads to telomerase activation. Relevant to its role in vascular disease, TERT is activated by mitogens, which are upregulated in diseases characterized by VSMC proliferation. There is emerging evidence that inhibiting telomerase in vivo may reduce vascular disease.5,6In this context, Gizard et al2 define the mechanism by which PPARα impairs cell proliferation in human coronary VSMC. They demonstrate that PPARα activation inhibits mitogen-induced telomerase activity by transcriptionally repressing TERT. Their methodical approach revealed that the effect of PPARα was indirect and related to inhibition of E2F binding sites in the TERT promoter. These sites had been described previously7 but not in vascular cells. Gizard et al found that PPARα activation inhibits TERT transcription by blocking the binding of E2F-1 to its binding sites in the proximal TERT promoter. In addition, p16 mediates some of the repression of TERT by recruiting p107 and p130 to the proximal E2F-1 site, further blocking TERT transcription. PPARα activation by fibrates inhibits telomerase activity by inducing p16, resulting in inhibition of E2F-dependent transcriptional activation of the TERT promoter. The authors present convincing loss- and gain-of-function studies to support a key role of E2F in the regulation of telomerase activity and prove that E2F is required for the repression of TERT promoter activity by PPARα. Moreover, their demonstration that fenofibric acid and gemfibrozil inhibit telomerase activation in a femoral artery endothelial-denudation model suggests this as a potential therapy in humans. This is feasible, because these drugs are widely used to increase high-density lipoprotein in humans, also through a PPARα-dependent mechanism. Thus, it appears that the antiproliferative effects of PPARα are caused by impingement on the p16/Rb/E2F transcriptional cascade and are ultimately mediated by suppression of telomerase (in vitro and in vivo). What are the intersections of this work with several newly identified pathways of VSMC proliferation (Figure)? Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Interactions of other pathways regulating VSMC proliferation with the telomerase pathway. Several pathways interact to control VSMC proliferation. External mitogenic signals activate mTOR, leading to proliferation. PPARα and PPARγ, as well as inhibitors of survivin and HDAC increase CDK inhibitor levels.Regulation of VSMC ProliferationAlthough it is not possible to discuss all molecules involved in controlling VSMC proliferation, some are noteworthy because they are recently recognized or are targeted by drugs that are either in clinical use or preclinical development. These are the low-hanging fruit that may be harvested in the attempts to selectively decrease VSMC proliferation in vascular disease.Mammalian Target of RapamycinMammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (Figure) is an ubiquitously expressed kinase that integrates cellular energy and nutrient status with external mitotic signals.8 When sufficient nutrients and appropriate mitogens are present, mTOR will lead to proliferation by the expression of several proteins including cyclin D1. Mitochondrial dysfunction, energy depletion, and amino acid deprivation all lead to mTOR inactivation, effectively blocking proliferation.9 The interaction of mTOR with mitochondria raises the possibility that changes in mitochondrial function would alter VSMC proliferation. Impaired mitochondrial function, and fusion has been proposed to be responsible for the development of certain forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension.10 In a potential link between this pathway and the present study, rapamycin upregulates CDK inhibitors p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 in VSMCs.11PPARγ AgonistsThiazolidinediones, such as rosiglitazone, are PPARγ agonists (Figure) developed for the therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. They decrease VSMC proliferation by inhibiting mitogen-induced degradation of the CDK inhibitors p21WAF1 and p27KIP1.12 PPARγ agonists might have a role in preventing transplant vasculopathy and neointima formation in PAH. For example, rosiglitazone reduces both pulmonary hypertension and vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertensive apolipoprotein E–knockout mice fed a high-fat diet.13SurvivinSurvivin (Figure), a known apoptosis inhibitor, was traditionally thought to be exclusively expressed in cancers but more recently has been found in vascular injury14 and PAH.15 However, survivin not only impairs apoptosis but also increases proliferation by initiating cell cycle entry. When survivin is translocated to the nucleus, it competes with CDK4 for interaction with p16INK4a,16 a potential link to the pathway described by Gizard et al.2 Inhibition of survivin can be therapeutically exploited to prevent neointima formation14 and reverses pulmonary hypertension and vascular obstruction in experimental models.15Pre–B-cell Colony-Enhancing Factor and Histone DeacetylaseThe pre–B-cell colony-enhancing factor (PBEF) is a regulator of SMC proliferation that increases nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase activity, upregulating supplies of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) for the SIRT transcription regulators. SIRT family members regulate transcription and apoptosis through their ability to deacetylate histones (Figure) and nonhistone proteins (eg, p53 and TERT). PBEF is able to shift VSMC from a proliferative to a contractile phenotype. PBEF overexpression enhances cell survival whereas PBEF knockdown increases SMC apoptosis.17 Through regulation of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, PBEF modulates VSMC proliferation and survival.17 There is a potential interaction between the cyclin-CDK-telomerase pathway and HDAC. The HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A results in histone hypermethylation of the p21WAF1 promoter,18 leading to increased p21WAF1 expression and cell cycle arrest in a variety of cells, including VSMCs.19Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type 2Loss of function mutations in bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) (Figure) are common in familial PAH, a disease characterized by excessive VSMC proliferation, particularly in response to transforming growth factor (TGF)β.20 Signaling from the BMPR2 receptor involves the SMAD signaling cascade. The connection of BMPR2 signaling to the cyclin–CDK–telomerase pathway is unknown; however, BMPR2 inactivation, which decreases VSMC differentiation, does lowers p27KIP1 expression.21Future StudiesThere are several areas which were not addressed by Gizard et al2 that merit further study.First, TERT activity can also be regulated at the posttranslational level by phosphorylation. For example, hypoxia (a well-established cause of pulmonary hypertension and excessive PASMC proliferation) increases TERT phosphorylation, which increases SMC proliferation.22 Thus, both activity and expression of TERT modulate telomerase activity and the role of “activity” deserves further study.Second, there are many parallels between proliferation of VSMC and cancer cells.23 A recent publication demonstrated reduced TERT expression in cancer cells exposed to TGFβ, which was dependent on the −252 to +3 region of the TERT promoter.24 Comparative studies of this pathway in cancer and vascular disease may be profitable.Third, as with most pathways, there is tissue heterogeneity in this pathway. Depending on cell type, E2F transcription factors can promote or inhibit TERT expression7 and different E2F transcription family members can have opposing effects on TERT promoter activity. The complexity of TERT expression needs further study to allow this mechanism to be therapeutically exploited.ConclusionSeveral signaling pathways exist in VSMCs to control proliferation (Figure). Although there are many upstream initiators of proliferation, there are fewer crucial downstream decision steps for determining whether VSMCs will proliferate. First, mTOR activation occurs only when the cellular environment is conducive for proliferation (sufficient nutrients/energy and absence of prohibitive signals). Second, many signaling pathways, including PPARα, converge in having effects of the CDK inhibitors, including p16INK4a, p21WAF1, and p27KIP1. Third, we now have another potential common point at which to attack proliferation-TERT.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Sources of FundingThis work was supported by NIH grant R01-HL071115.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Stephen L. Archer, MD, FAHA, FACC, FRCP(C), Harold Hines Jr. Professor of Medicine, Chief of Cardiology, University of Chicago (MC6080), 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, Colombo A, Schuler G, Barragan P, Guagliumi G, Molnar F, Falotico R. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1773–1780.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Gizard F, Nomiyama T, Zhao Y, Findeisen HM, Heywood EB, Jones KL, Staels B, Bruemmer D. The PPARα/p16INK4a pathway inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by repressing cell cycle–dependent telomerase activation. Circ Res. 2008; 103: 1155–1163.LinkGoogle Scholar3 Gizard F, Amant C, Barbier O, Bellosta S, Robillard R, Percevault F, Sevestre H, Krimpenfort P, Corsini A, Rochette J, Glineur C, Fruchart JC, Torpier G, Staels B. PPAR alpha inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation underlying intimal hyperplasia by inducing the tumor suppressor p16INK4a. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 3228–3238.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Schwartz GK, Shah MA. Targeting the cell cycle: a new approach to cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 9408–9421.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Fuster JJ, Andres V. Telomere biology and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2006; 99: 1167–1180.LinkGoogle Scholar6 Minamino T, Komuro I. Role of telomeres in vascular senescence. Front Biosci. 2008; 13: 2971–2979.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Won J, Yim J, Kim TK. Opposing regulatory roles of E2F in human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene expression in human tumor and normal somatic cells. FASEB J. 2002; 16: 1943–1945.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8 Martin KA, Blenis J. Coordinate regulation of translation by the PI 3-kinase and mTOR pathways. Adv Cancer Res. 2002; 86: 1–39.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Desai BN, Myers BR, Schreiber SL. FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein associates with mitochondria and senses osmotic stress via mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 4319–4324.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Archer SL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Maitland ML, Rich S, Garcia JG, Weir EK. Mitochondrial metabolism, redox signaling, and fusion: a mitochondria-ROS-HIF-1alpha-Kv1.5 O2-sensing pathway at the intersection of pulmonary hypertension and cancer. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 294: H570–H578.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Martin KA, Rzucidlo EM, Merenick BL, Fingar DC, Brown DJ, Wagner RJ, Powell RJ. The mTOR/p70 S6K1 pathway regulates vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004; 286: C507–C517.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Wakino S, Kintscher U, Kim S, Yin F, Hsueh WA, Law RE. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit retinoblastoma phosphorylation and G1–> S transition in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 22435–22441.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Hansmann G, Wagner RA, Schellong S, Perez VA, Urashima T, Wang L, Sheikh AY, Suen RS, Stewart DJ, Rabinovitch M. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is linked to insulin resistance and reversed by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1275–1284.LinkGoogle Scholar14 Simosa HF, Wang G, Sui X, Peterson T, Narra V, Altieri DC, Conte MS. Survivin expression is up-regulated in vascular injury and identifies a distinct cellular phenotype. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 41: 682–690.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar15 McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Altieri DC, Bonnet S, Haromy A, Harry G, Puttagunta L, Michelakis ED. Gene therapy targeting survivin selectively induces pulmonary vascular apoptosis and reverses pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 1479–1491.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Suzuki A, Hayashida M, Ito T, Kawano H, Nakano T, Miura M, Akahane K, Shiraki K. Survivin initiates cell cycle entry by the competitive interaction with Cdk4/p16(INK4a) and Cdk2/cyclin E complex activation. Oncogene. 2000; 19: 3225–3234.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 van der Veer E, Nong Z, O'Neil C, Urquhart B, Freeman D, Pickering JG. Pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor regulates NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase activity and promotes vascular smooth muscle cell maturation. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 25–34.LinkGoogle Scholar18 Richon VM, Sandhoff TW, Rifkind RA, Marks PA. Histone deacetylase inhibitor selectively induces p21WAF1 expression and gene-associated histone acetylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 10014–10019.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Okamoto H, Fujioka Y, Takahashi A, Takahashi T, Taniguchi T, Ishikawa Y, Yokoyama M. Trichostatin A, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation via induction of p21(WAF1). J Atheroscler Thromb. 2006; 13: 183–191.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20 Morrell NW, Yang X, Upton PD, Jourdan KB, Morgan N, Sheares KK, Trembath RC. Altered growth responses of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells from patients with primary pulmonary hypertension to transforming growth factor-beta(1) and bone morphogenetic proteins. Circulation. 2001; 104: 790–795.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 Tada Y, Majka S, Carr M, Harral J, Crona D, Kuriyama T, West J. Molecular effects of loss of BMPR2 signaling in smooth muscle in a transgenic mouse model of PAH. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007; 292: L1556–L1563.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22 Minamino T, Mitsialis SA, Kourembanas S. Hypoxia extends the life span of vascular smooth muscle cells through telomerase activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21: 3336–3342.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23 Bonnet S, Archer SL, Allalunis-Turner J, Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R, Lee CT, Lopaschuk GD, Puttagunta L, Harry G, Hashimoto K, Porter CJ, Andrade MA, Thebaud B, Michelakis ED. A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 2007; 11: 37–51.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24 Lacerte A, Korah J, Roy M, Yang XJ, Lemay S, Lebrun JJ. Transforming growth factor-beta inhibits telomerase through SMAD3 and E2F transcription factors. Cell Signal. 2008; 20: 50–59.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Hayes G, Pinto J, Sparks S, Wang C, Suri S and Bulte D (2022) Vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction in neurodegeneration, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnins.2022.1010164, 16 Wang G, Tao X and Peng L (2022) miR-155-5p regulates hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell function by targeting PYGL, Bioengineered, 10.1080/21655979.2022.2079304, 13:5, (12985-12997), Online publication date: 2-May-2022. Tang B, Tang M, Xu Q, Guo J, Xuan L, zhou J, Wang X, Zhang H and Kang P (2020) MicroRNA-143–5p modulates pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells functions in hypoxic pulmonary hypertension through targeting HIF-1α, Journal of Biosciences, 10.1007/s12038-020-9992-1, 45:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020. Shaban M, Elhefny R, Hussein S, Badr A and Nour Z (2019) Role of telomerase expression in interstitial lung diseases, Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 10.4103/ejb.ejb_71_18, 13:3, (349-357), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019. Chen X, Zhou W, Hu Q and Huang L (2019) Exploration of the Notch3‐HES5 signal pathway in monocrotaline‐induced pulmonary hypertension using rat model, Congenital Heart Disease, 10.1111/chd.12733, 14:3, (396-402), Online publication date: 1-May-2019. Wang F, Xu X, Tang W, Min L and Yang J (2018) Rab6A GTPase contributes to phenotypic modulation in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells under hypoxia, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 10.1002/jcb.28060, 120:5, (7858-7867), Online publication date: 1-May-2019. Zhang Y, Peng B and Han Y (2018) MiR-23a regulates the proliferation and migration of human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (HPASMCs) through targeting BMPR2/Smad1 signaling, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.172, 103, (1279-1286), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Happé C, Szulcek R, Voelkel N and Bogaard H (2016) Reconciling paradigms of abnormal pulmonary blood flow and quasi-malignant cellular alterations in pulmonary arterial hypertension, Vascular Pharmacology, 10.1016/j.vph.2016.01.004, 83, (17-25), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016. Shan F, Li J and Huang Q (2014) HIF-1 Alpha-Induced Up-Regulation of miR-9 Contributes to Phenotypic Modulation in Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells During Hypoxia, Journal of Cellular Physiology, 10.1002/jcp.24593, 229:10, (1511-1520), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. WAN J, YIN Y, SUN R, PAN G, LI P, JIA Y, WAN G and LIU Z (2013)(2013) Protective effect of the ultra-filtration extract from Xin Mai Jia on human aortic smooth muscle cell injury induced by hydrogen peroxide, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 10.3892/etm.2013.1365, 7:1, (11-16), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014. Konik E, Han Y and Brozovich F (2013) The role of pulmonary vascular contractile protein expression in pulmonary arterial hypertension, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.10.009, 65, (147-155), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013. Wang L, Gan H, Liu Y, Gu S, Li J, Guo L, Liu J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang J and Wang C (2013) The distinguishing cellular features of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells from chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients, Experimental Lung Research, 10.3109/01902148.2013.822947, 39:8, (349-358), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Hilenski L and Griendling K (2013) Vascular Smooth Muscle Vascular Medicine: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease, 10.1016/B978-1-4377-2930-6.00003-3, (25-42), . Plutzky J and Kelly D (2011) The PPAR-RXR Transcriptional Complex in the Vasculature, Circulation Research, 108:8, (1002-1016), Online publication date: 15-Apr-2011. Sarkar J, Gou D, Turaka P, Viktorova E, Ramchandran R and Raj J (2010) MicroRNA-21 plays a role in hypoxia-mediated pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 10.1152/ajplung.00201.2010, 299:6, (L861-L871), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010. November 7, 2008Vol 103, Issue 10 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.188003PMID: 18988899 Originally publishedNovember 7, 2008 Keywordshistone deacetylasePPARαcoronary artery restenosistelomerasepulmonary arterial hypertensionPDF download Advertisement