JUNE 11, 1986 marks the fortieth anniversary of the passage of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).1 After four decades of extensive experience with the APA, this symposium issue of the Virginia Law Review offers an opportunity to step back and examine the Act in a broader legal and political perspective. As Chairman of the Administrative Conference of the United States, I welcome this symposium and the opportunity to make these comments. Congress established the Administrative Conference as a permanent body to study the efficiency, adequacy, and fairness of the administrative procedure used by administrative agencies in carrying out administrative programs, and make recommendations to administrative agencies, collectively or individually, and to the President, Congress, or the Judicial Conference of the United States, in connection therewith.2 The Conference is, in effect, the administering agency of the APA and the only government agency with a primary and continuing interest in administrative procedure throughout the federal governments Pursuant to its legislative mandate, the Conference has, over the past eighteen years, continually reviewed agency experience under the APA and formulated proposals for improvement of the administrative process. The Conference has adopted over one hundred recommendations since