Experience In Robotic Surgery Research Articles

Outcome of Colorectal Robotic Surgery in Newly Established Robotic Surgery Center: A Case Series

Introduction: The robotic platform compared to laparoscopy has proven to have similar postoperative outcomes; however, its adoption in the Middle East has been slow and there are limited data regarding outcomes with its use in small newly established robotic colorectal programs. Our aim was to report our experience and outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery performed by fellowship-trained robotic colorectal surgeons and compare them to larger, more experienced centers. Methods: This is retrospective review of data collected between November 2021 and March 2023 from a tertiary health care referral center. The series included 51 patients who had elective or urgent robotic colorectal surgery. Patients who had emergency surgery were excluded. The outcomes were overall morbidity, serious morbidity, mortality, conversion to open, length of hospital stay, and quality of oncological specimen. Results: The overall morbidity was 31.4% (n = 16 patients). Only 9.8% (n = 5) had serious morbidity of which three required interventions under general anesthesia. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR = 4), and there was no mortality. Of 17 rectal cancer resections, 88% had complete mesorectal excision, 15 of them were R0 resections, median lymph node harvested was 14 (IQR = 7) and two cases were converted to open. All the colon cancer resections had R0 resection, median lymph nodes harvested was 21 (IQR = 4) and none were converted to open. Conclusions: The implementation and integration of robotic colorectal surgery at a newly established center in a small country, when led by fellowship-trained robotic colorectal surgeons, is safe and effective in terms of morbidity, mortality, conversion to open and specimen pathological quality.

Initial experience of a single surgeon for safety and feasibility of the Versius Robotic System in robot-assisted cholecystectomy and hernia repair.

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and perioperative outcomes of cholecystectomy and hernia repair performed with the Versius Robotic System by a surgeon with no prior robotic surgery experience. A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients who underwent cholecystectomy, inguinal, or umbilical hernia repair using the Versius Robotic System between August 2021 and June 2023 et al. Zahra Hospital, Dubai, UAE. A total of 105 patients (mean age 38.9 ± 9.2years) were included. Significant correlations existed between the number of robot-assisted cholecystectomies and the operative metrics. As the number increased, the duration of the total operative (r = -0.755, p < 0.001), docking (r = -0.683, p < 0.001), and console (r = -0.711, p < 0.001) times decreased, indicating improved efficiency with experience. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the Versius Robotic System for cholecystectomy and hernia repair, even for surgeons lacking prior robotic surgery experience.

Salvage transoral robotic surgery in recurrent oropharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Salvage surgery is still the best therapeutic option for resectable recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (rOPSCC). Transoral robotic surgery may potentially reduce the morbidity of standard open approaches. The aim of the study is to present oncological and functional outcomes of a monocentric experience in salvage transoral robotic surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients submitted to transoral robotic salvage surgery with or without neck dissection for cT1-3 rOPSCC. We investigated complication rate, survival outcomes (Overall Survival, Disease Specific Survival, Loco-Regional Recurrence Free Survival) and functional outcomes (tracheal tube and/or gastrostomy dependence). Sixty-one patients were included in the analysis. No major complications or perioperative deaths were recorded. The estimated 2-year OS was 76.7%, DSS 81.8% and LRRFS 50.5%. In multivariable analysis rpT, PNI (perineural infiltration) and HPV-positivity were significantly associated with LRRFS (Hazard Ratios: T3 vs T1 6.43, PNI yes vs no 4.19, HPV+ yes vs no 2.63). At last follow up, 97% of patients were tracheal tube-free, while 93% were gastrostomy-free. Transoral robotic salvage surgery is a successful treatment in selected patients affected by rOPSCC because it grants good oncologic and functional outcomes.

Prospective development study of the Versius Surgical System for use in transoral robotic surgery: an IDEAL stage 1/2a first in human and initial case series experience

PurposeTransoral robotic surgery is well established in the treatment paradigm of oropharyngeal pathology. The Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical) is a robotic platform in clinical use in multiple specialities but is currently untested in the head and neck. This study utilises the IDEAL framework of surgical innovation to prospectively evaluate and report a first in human clinical experience and single centre case series of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with Versius.MethodsFollowing IDEAL framework stages 1 and 2a, the study evaluated Versius to perform first in human TORS before transitioning from benign to malignant cases. Iterative adjustments were made to system setup, instrumentation, and technique, recorded in accordance with IDEAL recommendations. Evaluation criteria included successful procedure completion, setup time, operative time, complications, and subjective impressions. Further evaluation of the system to perform four-arm surgery was conducted.Results30 TORS procedures were successfully completed (15 benign, 15 malignant) without intraoperative complication or conversion to open surgery. Setup time significantly decreased over the study period. Instrumentation challenges were identified, urging the need for TORS-specific instruments. The study introduced four-arm surgery, showcasing Versius’ unique capabilities, although limitations in distal access were observed.ConclusionsTORS is feasible with the Versius Surgical System. The development of TORS-specific instruments would benefit performance and wider adoption of the system. 4-arm surgery is possible however further evaluation is required. Multicentre evaluation (IDEAL stage 2b) is recommended.

Could robotic-assisted surgery reduce mesh-related complications after ventral mesh rectopexy? Experience of a tertiary centre and systematic review of the literature.

The development of robotic assistance has made dissection and suturing in the deep pelvis much easier. The augmented quality of the images and the articulation of the robotic arms have also enabled a more precise dissection. The aim of this study is to present the data on robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy procedures in a university hospital and examine the literature in terms of mesh erosion. The electronic databases Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane were searched. Studies from January 2004 until January 2023 in the English language were included. Studies which included fewer than 10 patients were excluded. Laparoscopic or robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexies were included. Mesh erosion rates following laparoscopic or robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexies were measured. Overall, the systematic review presents 5911 patients from 43 studies who underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy compared with 746 patients treated with robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy from six studies and our centre. Mesh erosion was rare in both groups; however, the prevalence was greater in the laparoscopy group (0.90% vs. 0.27%). The mesh erosion rates are very low with robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy. For precise results, more studies and experience in robotic surgery are required.

Colorectal procedures with the novel Hugo™ RAS system: training process and case series report from a non-robotic surgical team.

The landscape of robotic surgery is evolving with the emergence of new platforms. However, reports on their applicability in different surgical fields are still limited and come from teams with robotics experience. This study aims to describe the training process for colorectal surgery with the Hugo™ RAS system of a robotics-inexperienced surgical team and present the initial patient series. The training process is depicted, and data from the first 10 consecutive patients operated on for colorectal conditions with the Hugo™ RAS system by a surgical team with no prior experience in robotic surgery were prospectively recorded and analysed. The team received intensive training in robotic surgery and specifically in the Hugo™ RAS system previously to the first case. Between May 2023 and December 2023, 10 patients underwent colorectal procedures: 5 right colectomies, 3 sigmoid resections, 1 high rectal resection and 1 ventral mesh rectopexy. The first case was proctored by an expert. Median docking time was 14 min and median total operative time was 185 min. The only technical difficulty during the procedures was occasional clashing of robotic arms. None had to be converted, and no intraoperative or postoperative morbidity was recorded. Hospital stays ranged from 2 to 4 days. A median of 21 lymph nodes were yielded in the operations for malignant conditions. Common colorectal procedures can be safely performed using the Hugo™ RAS platform. Prior experience in robotic surgery is not a necessary requirement, but following a structured training program is essential.

The value of collision feedback in robotic surgical skills training

Collision feedback about instrument and environment interaction is often lacking in robotic surgery training devices. The PoLaRS virtual reality simulator is a newly developed desk trainer that overcomes drawbacks of existing robot trainers for advanced laparoscopy. This study aimed to assess the effect of haptic and visual feedback during training on the performance of a robotic surgical task. Robotic surgery-naïve participants were randomized and equally divided into two training groups: Haptic and Visual Feedback (HVF) and No Haptic and Visual Feedback. Participants performed two basic virtual reality training tasks on the PoLaRS system as a pre- and post-test. The measurement parameters Time, Tip-to-tip distance, Path length Left/Right and Collisions Left/Right were used to analyze the learning curves and statistically compare the pre- and post-tests performances. In total, 198 trials performed by 22 participants were included. The visual and haptic feedback did not negatively influence the time to complete the tasks. Although no improvement in skill was observed between pre- and post-tests, the mean rank of the number of collisions of the right grasper (dominant hand) was significantly lower in the HVF feedback group during the second post-test (Mean Rank = 8.73 versus Mean Rank = 14.27, U = 30.00, p = 0.045). Haptic and visual feedback during the training on the PoLaRS system resulted in fewer instrument collisions. These results warrant the introduction of haptic feedback in subjects with no experience in robotic surgery. The PoLaRS system can be utilized to remotely optimize instrument handling before commencing robotic surgery in the operating room.

3. OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF STRESS LEVEL DURING ROBOTIC AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study is to objectively analyse the stress experienced by surgeons during the performance of training tasks in robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Methods For the parameters related to stress level, an electrodermal activity sensor (EDA) from the company Movisens was used. This sensor is placed on the subject's ankle using two electrodes that measure the impedance of the skin in the area in order to evaluate the surgeon's level of alertness in micro-siemens (µS). The surgical robot used was the Versius Platform from CMR Surgical. A group of 4 surgeons with different levels of experience (novice or expert) were evaluated under a series of 7 tasks on a physical laparoscopic simulator, with tasks progressively increasing in difficulty. Results Regarding the difference between the two surgical modalities, significantly lower values were obtained when using the robotic platform, with the difference being more pronounced among the less experienced surgeons. In the instance of the expert with prior surgical robotics experience, stress levels were found to be 100 times lower compared to the expert solely experienced in conventional laparoscopy. Conclusion The results show that not only do subjects with superior experience in robotic surgery exhibit lower stress levels, but that novices maintain lower stress levels than experts in conventional laparoscopic surgery due to their lack of predisposition towards a specific surgical discipline.

Proctoring System Enables Safe Induction of Robotic Gastrectomy: Short-term Outcomes of the First 10 Cases.

The Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) proctoring system was established to prevent serious pancreatic pressure injuries in Japan in 2019. To safely perform robotic gastrectomy (RG) in our hospital, which has no experience in robotic surgery, we conducted a clinical trial with the support of this proctoring system. The present study was a single-center clinical prospective study. The primary endpoint was morbidity determined using Clavien-Dindo classification (C-D) Grade IIIa or higher. Ten patients, seven males and three females, were recruited in this study. RG was performed under the proctoring system of the JSES in the initial six cases and was completed independently for the remaining four patients. We successfully performed the initial ten cases without C-D classification grade IIIa or higher morbidities. This study underscores the significance of a proctoring system for introducing RG to facilities with limited experience in robotic surgery. Despite some limitations, this study demonstrated successful outcomes in the initial ten cases, emphasizing the benefits for both surgeons and patients. This study provides valuable insights into the safety of RG in small institutions and calls for further research in this area.

Early Implementation of Robotic Training in Surgical and Surgical Subspecialty Residency.

Robotic surgery has emerged as an operative tool for many elective and urgent surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early surgical trainees' experiences and opinions of robotic surgery. An introductory robotic training course consisting of online da Vinci Xi/X training and in-person, hands on training was implemented for residents and medical students across surgical subspecialties at a single institution. A voluntary survey evaluating perceptions of and interest in robotic surgery and prior robotic surgery experience, as well as a basics of robotics quiz, was distributed to participants prior to the start of the in-person session. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the cohort. 85 trainees participated in the course between 2020 and 2023, including 58 first- and second-year surgical residents (general surgery, urology, OB/GYN, and thoracic surgery) and 27 fourth-year medical students. 9.4% of participants reported any formal robotic surgery training prior to the session, with only 19% of participants reporting robotic operative experience. 52% of the participants knew of and/or had completed the da Vinci online course modules prior to the scheduled training session. Participants unanimously (100%) agreed that robotic surgery should be implemented into surgical training. There is rising enthusiasm for robotic surgery, yet early exposure and training remain infrequent and inconsistent amongst medical students and new surgical residents. A standardized introduction of multi-disciplinary robotic surgery training should be incorporated into medical school and/or early residency education to ensure surgical residents receive appropriate exposure and training to achieve competency.

How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system?

To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system. Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups. Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected. The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.

Initial experience of the Versius robotic system in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a study of 58 cases.

The study presents the initial outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARPs) using the Versius robotic system in a urological centre with no prior robotic surgery experience. A retrospective analysis of 58 RARPs was conducted, including patients' parameters as well as Versius system performance. The study involved 58 patients (average age 66.9 years). Median preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 9.8 ng/ml, with 48% having ISUP grade group ≥ 3 on biopsy and 25.8% showing extraprostatic extension on MRI. Median blood loss was 437 ml, with complications (10.3% Clavien-Dindo grade II and 4 grade III cases). One conversion to open surgery occurred (0.58%). Final pathology revealed 46.5% extraprostatic disease, and 25.8% had positive margins. Post-surgery, 96.5% had undetectable PSA at 6 weeks. Continence rates were 89.7% at 6 weeks, increasing to 91.3% at 12 months. Median catheter duration was 7.9 days, and the hospital stay was 4.5 days. Console time averaged 150.9 minutes, with a median operative time of 213 minutes. The Versius system reported medium priority alarms in 24.1% of operations, including 1266 alarms related to robotic arm clashes and 43 instrument swaps. One bedside unit exchange occurred with no console or robotic system failures. The Versius robotic system can be successfully introduced in a urological centre without prior robotic surgery experience. Our setup and operating room positioning are effective, safe, and reproducible. We encountered and resolved surgical and technical challenges. Further follow-up studies are needed to assess the system's performance.

41. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery experience in Transoral Robotic Surgery for oropharyngeal tumour

41. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery experience in Transoral Robotic Surgery for oropharyngeal tumour

Experience of Robotic Complex Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a High-Volume Center.

A revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is necessary in about 28% of the patients. The role of robotic surgery in RBS is still a subject of debate. We aim to report the outcomes of robotic-assisted RBS at our institution. We identified patients who underwent robotic-assisted RBSs between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2022. We analyzed patient demographics and indications for surgery. Measured outcomes included peri- and postoperative morbidity, comorbidity management, and weight loss outcomes. A total of 106 patients were included. Primary procedures were adjustable gastric band 44 (41.5%), sleeve gastrectomy 42 (39.6%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) 18 (17%), duodenal switch (DS) 1 (0.9%), and vertical banded gastroplasty 1 (0.9%). RBSs performed included 85 (78.7%) RYGB, 16 (14.8%) redo-gastrojejunostomy, and 5 (4.6%) DS. The median time to revision was 8 (range 1-36) years, and the main indication was insufficient weight loss (49%). Median length of hospital stay was 2 (range 1-16) days, and 9 (8.5%) patients were readmitted during the first 30days. Only 4 (3.7%) patients had early Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher adverse events. No anastomotic leaks were documented. Median excess weight loss was 35.1%, 42.23%, and 45.82% at the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Of 57 patients with hypertension, 29 (50.9%) reduced their medication dosage, and 20/27 (74.1%) reduced their diabetes mellitus medication dosage. Finally, of the 75 patients with symptoms, 64 (85.3%) reported an improvement after the RBS. Robotic-assisted RBS is feasible, significantly improves patients' comorbidities and symptoms, and leads to considerable weight loss.

Robotic radical gastrectomy - own experience and review of literature

IntroductionGastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Surgery or endoscopic treatment is essential in all disease stages. The most common procedure is total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Removal of stomach and lymph nodes can be performed using minimally invasive techniques. These include laparoscopic gastrectomy, present in gastric cancer surgery since 1994 and robotic gastrectomy, which appeared for the first time in 2003. Last-mentioned method is the youngest and the most technically advanced form of surgical treatment of gastric cancer. First laparoscopic robot-assisted total gastrectomy in Poland was reported by Marek Zawadzki. In this paper we present technique of totally robotic total gastrectomy.AimPresentation of our experience in robotic radical gastrectomy. Description of first in Poland totally robotic gastrectomy. Review of literature assessing novel minimally invasive technique in gastric cancer treatment - robotic gastrectomy.Material and methodsPresentation of our own experience in robotic surgery. Review of literature.ResultsRobotic gastrectomy as an alternative to the laparoscopic technique is associated with earlier return of bowel motility after surgery and earlier introduction of a liquid diet. In terms of perioperative and postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality, as well as a need to convert to open surgery, the laparoscopic and robotic techniques do not differ from each other. In our Department for the first time in Poland totally robotic radical gastrectomy using da Vinci Xi ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical) was performed. No postoperative complications were observed.ConclusionsTotally robotic radical gastrectomy is a safe alternative to classic and laparoscopic surgery which can have additional benefits both for the surgeon (less exhaustion, ergonomy, lack of hand tremor on instruments) as for the patient (earlier tolerance of oral diet, earlier hospital discharge). Further study is needed to assess relevance of potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of this novel technique.

Identifying barriers to resident robotic console time in a general surgery residency through a targeted needs assessment.

Robotic-assisted general surgery is experiencing exponential growth. Despite our institution's high volume, residents often graduate with inadequate console experience. Our aim was to identify the educational needs of residents and perceived barriers to residents' console time from both attendings and residents. Separate surveys were created and distributed to robotic surgery faculty and general surgery residents at our institution. Questions were a variety of modalities and focused on the robotic surgery experience at our institution, including barriers to resident console time from both attending surgeon and resident perspectives. Although residents' interest in robotic surgery exceeded that of open and laparoscopic surgery, confidence in their robotic skills was low compared to the other modalities. The top barriers to participating in robotic cases according to residents included minimal or no previous console time with the attending, lack of simulator time, and being required to perform bedside assistant duties. Faculty reported resident preparedness, prior robotic skill demonstration, simulator time, case complexity, and their own confidence as significant factors influencing resident console time. Using these results, we concluded that the design and implementation of a formal robotic surgery curriculum should incorporate simulation-based opportunities for residents to practice their skills, improve confidence, and increase console experience. In addition, simulation opportunities for faculty should also be considered to allow for improvement and maintenance of robotic surgical skills.

Characterization of the robotic surgery experience in minimally invasive surgery fellowships from 2010 to 2021.

Robotic surgery has experienced exponential growth in the past decade. Few studies have evaluated the impact of robotics within minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellowship training programs. The purpose of our study was to examine and characterize recent trends in robotic surgery within MIS fellowship training programs. De-identified case log data from the Fellowship Council from 2010 to 2021 were evaluated. Percentage of operations performed with robot assistance over time was assessed and compared to the laparoscopic and open experience. Case logs were further stratified by operative category (e.g., bariatric, hernia, foregut), and robotic experience over time was evaluated for each category. Programs were stratified by percent robot use and the experience over time within each quartile was evaluated. MIS fellowship training programs with a robotic platform increased from 45.1% (51/113) to 90.4% (123/136) over the study period. The percentage of robotic cases increased from 2.0% (1127/56,033) to 23.2% (16,139/69,496) while laparoscopic cases decreased from 80.2% (44,954/56,033) to 65.3% (45,356/69,496). Hernia and colorectal case categories had the largest increase in robot usage [hernia: 0.7% (62/8614) to 38.4% (4661/12,135); colorectal 4.2% (116/2747) to 31.8% (666/2094)]. When stratified by percentage of robot utilization, current (2020-2021) programs in the > 95th percentile performed 21.8% (3523/16,139) of robotic operations and programs in the > 50th percentile performed 90.0% (14,533/16,139) of all robotic cases. The median number of robotic cases performed per MIS fellow significantly increased from 2010 to 2021 [0 (0-6) to 72.5 (17.8-171.5), p < 0.01]. Robotic use in MIS fellowship training programs has grown substantially in the past decade, but the laparoscopic and open experience remains robust. There remains an imbalance with the top 50% of busiest robotic programs performing over 90% of robot trainee cases. The experience in MIS programs varies widely and trainees should examine program case logs closely to confirm parallel interests.

Differences in the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair according to surgeon’s robotic experience

PurposeIn this study, we aim to analyze the learning curve of each step of robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) in two surgeons with varying degrees of expertise with the robotic platform but no experience with laparoscopic hernia repair.MethodsData on 124 rTAPP cases performed by two surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was applied to visualize the learning curve of rTAPP on operation time of each step of the procedure [the peritoneal flap creation (T1), the completion of the critical view of the myopectineal orifice (T2), the mesh application (T3) and the peritoneal flap closure (T4)]. Each intraoperative and postoperative outcome was compared according to surgeon’s experience with the robotic platform and learning phase. The robotic surgeon mentored the surgeon-in-training and was present during all surgeries in his learning period.ResultsThe surgeon in training with the robotic platform showed a learning phase till the 20th procedure followed by a gradual improvement in performances. The expert surgeon showed a learning phase till the 35th procedure after which a constant decrease of operative time was recorded till the last procedure included. The operative times of each step of the procedures of both surgeons were significantly improved after the learning phase. In the late phase, the surgeon in training could achieve operative times in T2 and T3, which are similar to those of an experienced robotic surgeon with no experience with TAPP before the completion of the learning phase.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the learning phase of rTAPP surgery may vary between 20 and 35 cases, depending on the surgeon’s experience in robotic surgery.

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: superior outcomes after completion of the learning curve

The use of robots in donor nephrectomy has increased in recent years. However, whether robot-assisted methods have better outcomes than traditional laparoscopic methods and how surgical experience influences these outcomes remains unclear. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RADN) with those of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and to investigate the effects of surgical experience on these outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (through PubMed) and Web of Science databases. Perioperative data were extracted for meta-analysis. To assess the impact of the learning curve, a subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between inexperienced and experienced surgeons. Seventeen studies with 6970 donors were included. Blood loss was lower (mean difference [MD] = – 13.28, p < 0.01) and the warm ischemia time was shorter (MD = – 0.13, p < 0.05) in the LDN group than the RADN group. There were no significant differences in terms of conversion to open surgery, operation time, surgical complications, hospital stay, costs, and delayed graft function between the groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that operation time (MD = – 1.09, p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD = – 1.54, p < 0.05) were shorter and the rate of conversion to open surgery (odds ratios [OR] = 0.14, p < 0.0001) and overall surgical complications (OR = 0.23, p < 0.05) were lower in experienced RADN surgeons than in experienced LDN surgeons. Surgical experience enhances the perioperative outcomes following RADN more than it does following LDN. This suggests that RADN could be the method of choice for living donor nephrectomy as soon as surgeons gain sufficient experience in robotic surgery.

The learning curve on robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy performed by a single endocrine surgeon in a third-level institution in Europe: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis

Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy is widely performed in Asian countries, although it is still under discussion in the Western World. However, there have been few studies reporting on the learning curve of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy. We used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve of gasless robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy at a third-level institution in Europe. We included all consecutive patients operated by a single surgeon without previous experience of robotic surgery from February 2012 to January 2023. The primary endpoint of the study was the learning curve extracted from the median operative time using the CUSUM method for the quantitative assessment. Overall, 583 patients were enrolled. The median operative time for thyroid lobectomy and total thyroidectomy was 70 and 90 min, respectively. The CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve for thyroid lobectomy and total thyroidectomy is 66 and 56 cases, respectively. Moreover, the presence of thyroiditis resulted associated with shorter operative time for total thyroidectomy (p = 0.044), whereas no factors resulted associated with surgical complications. The learning curve for performing robotic transaxillary thyroid lobectomy for a surgeon without previous robotic experience is 66 cases. After that, 56 cases must be performed to acquire proficiency in robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy. Training programs may reduce the slope of the learning curve.