Exenatide Extended-release Research Articles

Comparative cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 agonists using real-world data.

There is limited research using real-world data to evaluate protective cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) early in treatment. We conducted a retrospective, active comparator cohort study using 2011-2015 administrative claims data to compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) event rates following initiation of exenatide extended-release (E-ER), exenatide immediate-release (E-IR) or liraglutide in T2D adults who previously received no other antidiabetic medication (ADM) except metformin. The primary outcome was time to first major adverse CVD event (ischaemic heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure or peripheral arterial disease) after starting GLP-1. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the association between index GLP-1 and CVD events, adjusting for baseline patient, prescriber and plan characteristics. Primary analyses included all patients with ≥2 prescription fills for the index GLP-1, regardless of subsequent refill adherence or initiation of other ADM after index date. Compared with liraglutide, neither E-ER nor E-IR was associated with risk of composite major CVD events (hazard ratios [HRs] for E-ER and E-IR: 1.33 [95% C.I. 0.73-2.39] and 1.30 [0.81-2.09]). No associations were observed between event rates for individual CVD components. The HR for an ischaemic event with E-IR relative to liraglutide was 1.85 (95% C.I. 0.97-3.53). Adjusting for time-varying exposure to other ADM and CVD medications after index date produced similar results. Initiating either immediate or extended-release exenatide rather than liraglutide was not associated with significant differences in CVD risk in this observational real-world study.

Feasibility of Exenatide, a GLP-1R Agonist, for Treating Cocaine Use Disorder: A Case Series Study.

Cocaine use remains a serious public health problem associated with a marked increase in overdose deaths in the past decade. No medications have yet been proven to be effective for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD). Among the highly promising medications have been glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) that are currently used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and weight management. Preclinically, GLP-1RAs have been shown to attenuate cocaine self-administration, however, this has not yet been demonstrated in a human laboratory study. The GLP-1RA extended-release exenatide is given as a once-weekly injection, which may be clinically advantageous for addressing medication nonadherence among individuals with CUD. Here, we assess feasibility and safety by reporting on 3 cases of patients with CUD who received 6 weeks of exenatide 2 mg subcutaneously once-weekly in an open-label fashion, along with standard individual drug counseling. We observed excellent attendance and compliance, along with positive end-of-study satisfaction ratings. The medication was well tolerated and without unexpected or severe adverse events. Results for cocaine use and related clinical effects were more mixed, yet encouraging. Future empirical testing of exenatide for treating CUD should utilize a randomized controlled trial design and longer treatment duration.

Impact of semaglutide on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: exploratory patient-level analyses of SUSTAIN and PIONEER randomized clinical trials

BackgroundExploratory analysis to determine the effect of semaglutide versus comparators on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.MethodsTrials of once-weekly subcutaneous (SUSTAIN 3) and once-daily oral (PIONEER 1, 2, 5) semaglutide with hsCRP data were analyzed. Subjects with type 2 diabetes (N = 2482) received semaglutide (n = 1328) or comparators (placebo, n = 339; exenatide extended-release, n = 405; empagliflozin, n = 410). hsCRP ratio to baseline at end-of-treatment was analyzed overall, by clinical cutoff (< 1.0, ≥ 1.0 to ≤ 3.0, or > 3.0 mg/L), by tertile, and by estimated glomerular filtration rate in PIONEER 5 (a trial which was conducted in a population with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease [CKD]). Mediation analyses assessed the effect of change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or change in body weight (BW) on hsCRP reductions.ResultsGeometric mean baseline hsCRP was similar across trials (range 2.7–3.0 mg/L). Semaglutide reduced hsCRP levels by clinical cutoffs and tertiles from baseline to end-of-treatment in all trials versus comparators (estimated treatment ratios [ETRs] versus comparators: 0.70–0.76; p < 0.01) except versus placebo in PIONEER 5 (ETR [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.67–1.03]; p > 0.05). The effect of semaglutide on hsCRP was partially mediated (20.6–61.8%) by change in HbA1c and BW.ConclusionsSemaglutide reduced hsCRP ratios-to-baseline versus comparators in subjects with type 2 diabetes (not significant with CKD). This effect was partially mediated via reductions in HbA1c and BW and potentially by a direct effect of semaglutide. Semaglutide appears to have an anti-inflammatory effect, which is being further investigated in ongoing trials.Trial registrations: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01885208 (first registered June 2013), NCT02906930 (first registered September 2016), NCT02863328 (first registered August 2016), NCT02827708 (first registered July 2016).

Cost-Utility Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, and Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Metformin-Based Background Therapy in China.

Introduction: The substantial financial burden associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) over a lifetime cannot be neglected. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic value of three once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, namely subcutaneous semaglutide (sc. SEMA), dulaglutide (DULA), and extended-release exenatide (e-r EXEN), in treating patients with T2D that cannot be controlled with metformin-based background therapy, and to find a suitable price reduction for non-cost-effective medications, to provide reasonable recommendations to the administration for adjusting drug prices. Methods: The baseline characteristics of the simulation patient cohort were sourced from a comprehensive meta-analysis synthesizing 453 trials evaluating 21 hypoglycemic agents from nine categories of drugs. The UKPDS OM2 was applied to project the long-term effectiveness and costs from a Chinese health care provider’s perspective. After cost-utility analysis, the reasonable price adjustment of non-cost-effective options was explored via binary search. Uncertainty was measured by means of sensitivity analysis. Results: After a 40-year simulation, the sc. SEMA, DULA, and e-r EXEN groups yielded 9.6315, 9.5968, and 9.5895 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. In terms of expenditure, the total costs for the sc. SEMA, DULA, and e-r EXEN groups were $42012.47, $24931.27, and $40264.80, respectively. DULA was dominant over e-r EXEN due to the higher QALYs and lower total costs. The ICURs of sc. SEMA vs. DULA and sc. SEMA vs. e-r EXEN were $492994.72/QALY and $41622.69/QALY (ICUR > λ), respectively, indicating that sc. SEMA was not more cost-effective than DULA or e-r EXEN. The INMB and absolute NMB yielded the same conclusions which were robust to one-way, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. After several assumptions in the binary search, sc. SEMA and e-r EXEN appear to become cost-effective when their annual costs are decreased by 57.67% and 70.34%, respectively, with DULA as a counterpart. Conclusion: From the cost-utility analysis, DULA appears to be the most cost-effective option among sc. SEMA, DULA, and e-r EXEN for the treatment of patients with T2D receiving metformin-based background therapy. With a 57.67% or 70.34% reduction in cost, sc. SEMA or e-r EXEN, respectively, would become as cost-effective as DULA in China.

Association of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Analogs and Agonists Administered for Obesity with Weight Loss and Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BackgroundComparative effectiveness of 7 glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agents on weight loss (WL) in obesity remains unknown.MethodsWe performed a systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA) utilizing the following data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central and clinical trial registries, from inception to March 2, 2021. The prespecified criteria for study inclusion were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥12 weeks’ duration. The data appraisal and extraction were performed by two investigators independently, using the published reports. The main outcomes and statistical methods were weight loss over placebo (WLOP) and adverse events (AEs) among GLP-1 agents using random-effects NMA (frequentist approach); relative ranking using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) method and certainty of evidence using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE).Findings64 RCTs (from 2004 to 2021) included 27018 patients (median of age, 55.1 years old; 57.4% women; baseline weight 94.8kg and BMI 33.0kg/m2; trial duration 26 weeks). Direct meta-analysis showed significant WLOP with: -1.44kg (95% CI, -2.14 to -0.74) with dulaglutide ≥1.5 mg; -1.82kg (-2.42 to -1.23) with exenatide immediate release (IR); -2.20kg (-4.31 to -0.08) with exenatide extended release (ER); -3.20kg (-6.53 to 0.15) with efpeglenatide; -2.72kg (-3.35 to -2.09) with liraglutide ≤1.8mg; -4.49kg (-5.26 to -3.72) with liraglutide >1.8mg; -0.62kg (-1.22 to -0.02) with lixisenatide; -4.33kg (-5.71 to -3.00) with semaglutide SQ <2.4mg; -9.88kg (-13.17 to -6.59) with semaglutide SQ 2.4mg; -2.73kg (-4.81 to -0.65) with semaglutide oral; and -1.71kg (-2.64 to -0.78) with taspoglutide. Highest WLOP were with semaglutide SQ 2.4mg and <2.4mg, and liraglutide >1.8mg (SUCRAs 100, 86.1, 82.8 respectively). Highest SUCRAs for discontinuation due to AEs were with taspoglutide and liraglutide >1.8mg. Risk of bias was high or unclear for random sequence generation (29.7%), allocation concealment (26.6%), and incomplete outcome data (26.6%). Heterogeneity (I2 >50%) in WL and AEs reflected magnitude, not direction of effect.

25734 Migratory panniculitis of the pannus

We present a case of a 63-year-old Hispanic female with a medical history significant for type II diabetes mellitus who presented with a 1-year history of painful migratory nodules on her abdomen. She reported that approximately 2 months after beginning weekly injections with exenatide for diabetes she noticed a tender lesion on the left lower quadrant of her abdomen. Her primary care physician diagnosed it as a lipoma. Over the subsequent months she developed a new painful nodule roughly every week on her abdomen that coincided with prior exenatide injection sites. She stated that the lesions were initially painful then spontaneously resolved after several weeks. On examination there were two 1-cm deep-seated nodules that were tender to palpation without any overlying epidermal changes. An ultrasound demonstrated two 3-6 mm foci of increased echogenicity in the subcutaneous fat. One 4-mm punch biopsy of each of the 2 lesions demonstrated a predominantly septal panniculitis containing amorphous material associated with a mixed inflammatory infiltrate. No organisms were identified with GMS and AFB stains; however, the AFB stain highlighted the amorphous material. Infrared spectroscopy of the material closely matched normal tissue containing poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). Exenatide extended-release is incorporated in PLGA microspheres. Given the clinical presentation, histologic findings, and infrared spectroscopy results, a diagnosis of exenatide-induced panniculitis was made. Clinicians should be aware of possible injection site reactions with subcutaneously administered medications.

Cardiovascular impact of new drugs (GLP-1 and gliflozins): the ABCD position statement

The glucose intolerance of diabetes aggravates atherosclerosis indirectly through its effect on lipids and endothelial function. The cardiovascular (CV) impact of this metabolic disturbance is seen in the worsening of atherosclerotic vascular disease predominantly manifest as progression of coronary and cerebrovascular disease. The microvascular changes induced by prolonged glucose intolerance lead to ultrastructural changes in the glomerular basement membrane and renal mesangium which alters intrarenal haemodynamics, which may become evident initially as proteinuria and later lead to a decline in glomerular filtration rate. As the kidney plays a central role in blood pressure control, these changes have far-reaching CV consequences in patients with diabetes.Despite this, glucose lowering has been shown to have only a modest impact on CV outcomes in diabetes. The new antidiabetic medications have been studied in clinical trials designed to assure safety as grounded in the FDA guidance of 2008. Whilst a direct comparison of results from these trials is not possible in view of heterogeneity in trial design, the individual CV outcome measures have broadly re-defined their role in terms of equivalence (non-inferiority) and/or benefit (superiority). The composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE) may be perceived as surrogate markers for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This has been universally accepted as the primary endpoint in these cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and has been helpful in understanding the possible CV impact these drugs may have on patients with diabetes.The dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-IV) inhibitors (sitagliptin, alogliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin), two sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin) and two glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) drugs (lixisenatide and extended-release exenatide) have demonstrated non-inferiority on MACE outcomes with comparators – that is, they have assured CV safety when used in conjunction with other glucose-lowering treatment to improve glycaemic control. Four GLP-1 agonists (liraglutide, albiglutide, semaglutide and dula- glutide) and two SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin and canagliflozin) have demonstrated CV benefit on MACE outcomes; such demonstration of superiority may be seen as evidence for benefit. The SGLT2 inhibitors canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin have all demonstrated a significant benefit in reducing the risk of hospitalisation due to heart failure (HHF) as a secondary/ exploratory outcome measure in their CVOTs. Further confirmation of benefit in heart failure independent of the presence of glucose intolerance has been demonstrated with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in heart failure patients with or without diabetes. However, a comparable benefit in heart failure has not so far been seen in studies with the DPP-IV inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists. Albiglutide is not available in the UK and may have little relevance to the practising clinician other than through the information it contributes about the possible mechanisms of action of GLP-1 RA medications.

Euglycemic DKA in Patients on SGLT2 Inhibitor and Potentially Ketotic State

Background: With mounting evidence demonstrating improved cardiovascular and renal outcomes with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, this class of newest antidiabetic agents is rapidly gaining favor. SGLT2 inhibition lowers the renal threshold for glucose excretion, resulting in renal glycosuria, a shift in substrate utilization from carbohydrate to fat oxidation and hyperglucagonemia and thus poses the risk of developing euglycemic DKA as a rare but serious adverse effect. Clinical Cases: the first case is A 36-year-old female was diagnosed with type 2 DM with an HbA1c of 10% and was started on multi-agent antihyperglycemic therapy including metformin 500 mg BID, extended release exenatide 2 mg once a week and empagliflozin 25 mg once daily which were all initiated simultaneously. 2 days after starting regimen, she complained of nausea, vomiting and was unable to tolerate oral diet and fluids by day 4 which potentially predisposed to starvation ketoacidosis. She presented to the ED with normal vitals, grossly normal physical exam and labs were significant for beta-hydroxybutyrate of over 7 mmol/L (ref range <0.28), bicarbonate of 10 mmol/L (22 - 33), anion gap 25 (7 - 17), arterial pH 7.16 (7.33 - 7.43), serum glucose 111 (7.33 - 7.43). GAD-65 antibody titer was <5 IU/mL (< 5). She was diagnosed with euglycemic DKA, transferred to ICU and started on DKA protocol to which she responded very well. Second patient is A 65 Years old male with past medical history of CAD, HTN, HDL, history of PE/DVT and Type 2 DM was on insulin and jardiance, started ketodiet while continuing taking the jardiance and stopped taking his insulin because his sugars were controlled presented to the ED with abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, had relatively normal vitals and benign physical exam, labs showed Bicarbonate of 9 mmol/L (22 - 33), anion gap of 31 (7 - 17), venous pH of 7.07 (7.33 - 7.43) glucose was 189 (7.33 - 7.43), beta-hydroxybutyrate of over 7.7 mmol/L (ref range <0.28), patient was admitted to the ICU and started on insulin on DKA protocol Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors may be associated with DKA due to their ketogenic effects secondary to enhanced lipolysis and increased glucagon to insulin ratio. although not expected, euglycemic DKA could be much more present in cases where there is predisposition to increase ketones generation w/without appropriate clearance eg. starvation, ketotic diet, AKI, etc. These should be monitored for and the patient needs to be educated about accordingly to prevent both adverse outcomes and potential decrease in drug use if not strongly indicated. also,It would be prudent for prescribing clinicians to advise patients to withhold potentially harming medications temporarily if they cannot maintain adequate oral intake.

Can a monthly exenatide extended release regimen provide a therapeutic and cost benefit?

Exenatide is used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. The current regimen is a 2 mg extended release (ER) weekly injection. The aim of our study was to prove the efficacy of exenatide ER if administered once-monthly. The proposed monthly dose was based on an Excel simulation using pharmacokinetic parameters extracted using Plot Digitizer® (version 2.6.8) from Cirincione etal.(2017), as well as accounting for the exenatide ER formulation characteristics, in vivo and in vitro exenatide stability. A PBPK model of exenatide molecule was developed using (Simcyp® version 19) based on data from in vitro and clinical PK studies. The model was used to confirm the Excel simulation findings of the effectiveness of exenatide ER monthly in maintaining the plasma level above the minimum effective concentration (MEC). Our simulation from Excel and Simcyp® showed that the drug plasma levels of the once monthly ER dose maintained a steady state concentration (Css ) above the MEC. The simulated Excel plasma level ranged from Cmin to Cmax of 60-130ng/L, respectively. The exenatide compound was successfully modeled and used to predict the Css of the ER monthly dose. The Simcyp® simulated Css of the ER was 117ng/L. A monthly exenatide ER dose provides a plasma level within the therapeutic range. This new proposed dose has a significant pharmacoeconomic benefit and could well improve patient adherence.

Exenatide Adjunct to Nicotine Patch Facilitates Smoking Cessation and May Reduce Post-Cessation Weight Gain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Approved pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation are modestly effective, underscoring the need for improved pharmacotherapies. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists attenuate the rewarding effects of nicotine in preclinical studies. We examined the efficacy of extended-release exenatide, a GLP-1R agonist, combined with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT, patch) for smoking cessation, craving, and withdrawal symptoms, with post-cessation body weight as a secondary outcome. Eighty-four prediabetic and/or overweight smokers were randomized (1 : 1) to once-weekly placebo or exenatide, 2 mg, subcutaneously. All participants received NRT (21 mg) and brief smoking cessation counseling. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence (expired CO level ≤5 ppm), craving, withdrawal, and post-cessation body weight were assessed following 6 weeks of treatment. A Bayesian approach for analyzing generalized linear models yielded posterior probabilities (PP) to quantify the evidence favoring hypothesized effects of treatment on the study outcomes. Exenatide increased the risk for smoking abstinence compared to placebo (46.3% and 26.8%, respectively), (risk ratio [RR] = 1.70; 95% credible interval = [0.96, 3.27]; PP = 96.5%). Exenatide reduced end-of-treatment craving in the overall sample and withdrawal among abstainers. Post-cessation body weight was 5.6 pounds lower in the exenatide group compared to placebo (PP = 97.4%). Adverse events were reported in 9.5% and 2.3% of participants in the exenatide and placebo groups, respectively. Exenatide, in combination with the NRT improved smoking abstinence, reduced craving and withdrawal symptoms, and decreased weight gain among abstainers. Findings suggest that the GLP-1R agonist strategy is worthy of further research in larger, longer duration studies. Despite considerable progress in tobacco control, cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease, disability, and death. In this pilot study, we showed that extended-release exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, added to the nicotine patch, improved abstinence and mitigated post-cessation body weight gain compared to patch alone. Further research is needed to confirm these initial positive results.

Cardiovascular Safety and Benefits of Semaglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Findings From SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6

To exclude an excess risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, CV outcomes trials (CVOTs) have assessed the effects of new glucose-lowering therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), in patients with type 2 diabetes and established CV disease or CV risk factors. The CV safety of semaglutide vs. placebo, when added to standard care, was evaluated in the SUSTAIN 6 trial for the formulation administered once-weekly subcutaneously and in PIONEER 6 for the new once-daily oral formulation. In SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6, both powered to demonstrate noninferiority (upper 95% confidence interval [CI] of the hazard ratio [HR] <1.8), there were fewer first major adverse CV events with semaglutide vs. placebo, with HRs of 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.95) and 0.79 (0.57–1.11), respectively. In SUSTAIN 6, the results were significant for noninferiority and superiority, although the latter was not prespecified. Surprisingly, CV and all-cause mortality were significantly reduced by oral semaglutide in PIONEER 6. The ongoing SOUL CVOT will further inform about CV outcomes with oral semaglutide vs. placebo (NCT03914326). Findings from SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 fall within the spectrum reported with other GLP-1RA CVOTs: noninferiority vs. placebo for major CV events was seen with lixisenatide and exenatide extended-release, while superiority was demonstrated with liraglutide, albiglutide, and dulaglutide. Beneficial outcomes have been recognized in international guidelines, which recommend subcutaneous liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide to reduce the risk of CV events in high-risk patients. Both indirect mechanisms via risk factor modification and direct effects via GLP-1 receptors in the CV system have been proposed to be responsible for CV event reductions. The exact mechanism(s) remains to be characterized, but appears to be mainly linked to anti-atherosclerotic effects. Further research is needed to elucidate the relevant mechanisms for CV benefits of GLP-1RAs.

PDB28 MODEL-Based LONG-TERM Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Compared with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review

To systematically review the existing pharmacoeconomic literatures evaluating the long-term cost effectiveness associated with once-weekly semaglutide in type 2 diabetes. A systematic literature review up to 1st Apr 2020 in PubMed, web of science, and the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) presentation database was conducted. All long-term cost-effectiveness studies assessing once-weekly semaglutide comparing with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were included. A total of ten studies were identified, including eight studies based on the IQVIA Core diabetes model and two studies based on the Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D (IHE model). Results showed that once-weekly semaglutide reduced cumulative incidence and delayed time to onset of diabetes-related complications than all comparators, resulting in improvement of quality-adjusted life expectancy, and saving of complication cost over patient lifetime horizon. When comparing with dulaglutide, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5mg and 1.0mg were associated with a range of 0.02∼0.11 QALYs gained and 0.05∼0.34 QALYs gained, respectively. The total cost of once-weekly semaglutide was projected to be lower than dulaglutide in most of the studies. When comparing with exenatide extended-release, lixisenatide and liraglutide, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5mg and 1.0mg were associated with a range of 0.14∼0.39 QALYs gained and 0.13∼0.71 QALYs gained, respectively. The total cost of once-weekly semaglutide was projected to be lower or slightly higher, which varied from comparators. Results based on the IQVIA Core diabetes model and IHE model were similar. The treatment algorithm and criteria for treatment change assumed in the model simulation would be more important for the long-term projection than the economic model used. The current literature presents that compared with dulaglutide and other GLP-1 RAs, once-weekly semaglutide was considered dominated or highly cost-effectiveness treatment alternative for type 2 diabetes.

Injection-Site Nodules Associated With Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Administration of Semaglutide.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a safe and effective treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes (1). Selective activation of the GLP-1 receptor causes glucose-dependent insulin secretion, resulting in a very low risk of hypoglycemia (2). The additional mechanism of slowing gastric emptying has resulted in reliable weight loss with this class of antihyperglycemic medications (3). In addition, multiple agents in this drug class (semaglutide, liraglutide, and dulaglutide) have been proven to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events (4). Furthermore, the possibility of once-weekly dosing for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes has been realized with some GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, exenatide extended-release, and dulaglutide) as a result of albumin binding that decreases renal clearance and protects against metabolic degradation by the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme (2). Poor adherence to pharmacologic therapy is well documented in patients with type 2 diabetes and is linked to inadequate glycemic control (based on the American Diabetes Association’s general A1C goal of <7%), and once-weekly dosing has been shown to improve adherence rates (5,6). The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in practice has become more prominent in recent years, and adverse reactions are generally benign. Most commonly, patients have reported gastrointestinal upset (>10%) and injection-site reactions (>1%) (1,7). General injection-site reactions (e.g., erythema, pain, or rash) have been reported with all of the commercially available GLP-1 receptor agonists (i.e., exenatide, lixisenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide) (8–13). However, post-marketing reports have revealed that exenatide extended-release, specifically, may cause more alarming injection-site …

Glycemic variability in newly diagnosed diabetic cats treated with the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue exenatide extended release.

BackgroundGlycemic variability (GV) is an indicator of glycemic control and can be evaluated by calculating the SD of blood glucose measurements. In humans with diabetes mellitus (DM), adding a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analogue to conventional therapy reduces GV. In diabetic cats, the influence of GLP‐1 analogues on GV is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate GV in diabetic cats receiving the GLP‐1 analogue exenatide extended release (EER) and insulin.AnimalsThirty client‐owned cats with newly diagnosed spontaneous DM.MethodsRetrospective study. Blood glucose curves from a recent prospective placebo‐controlled clinical trial generated 1, 3, 6, 10, and 16 weeks after starting therapy were retrospectively evaluated for GV. Cats received either EER (200 μg/kg) or 0.9% saline SC once weekly, insulin glargine and a low‐carbohydrate diet. Mean blood glucose concentrations were calculated and GV was assessed by SD. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests.ResultsIn the EER group, GV (mean SD [95% confidence interval]) was lower at weeks 6 (1.69 mmol/L [0.9‐2.48]; P = .02), 10 (1.14 mmol/L [0.66‐1.62]; P = .002) and 16 (1.66 mmol/L [1.09‐2.23]; P = .02) compared to week 1 (4.21 mmol/L [2.48‐5.93]) and lower compared to placebo at week 6 (3.29 mmol/L [1.95‐4.63]; P = .04) and week 10 (4.34 mmol/L [2.43‐6.24]; P < .000). Cats achieving remission (1.21 mmol/L [0.23‐2.19]) had lower GV compared to those without remission (2.96 mmol/L [1.97‐3.96]; P = .01) at week 6.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceThe combination of EER, insulin, and a low‐carbohydrate diet might be advantageous in the treatment of newly diagnosed diabetic cats.

Cardiovascular safety outcomes of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.

What is known and objectivePeople with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which in turn is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes has been investigated in CV outcomes trials (CVOTs). This review aims to help pharmacists and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) gain a better understanding of such CVOTs in T2D with a primary focus on the once‐weekly (QW) GLP‐1 RAs.MethodsThis narrative review mainly focuses on the evaluation of the similarities and differences in the design and results of CVOTs involving currently approved and marketed QW GLP‐1 RAs—semaglutide subcutaneous, exenatide extended‐release (ER) and dulaglutide. Results from CVOTs of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are also included.Results and discussionThree CVOTs of QW GLP‐1 RAs were identified for inclusion in this review: SUSTAIN 6 (semaglutide), EXSCEL (exenatide ER) and REWIND (dulaglutide), all of which varied in terms of trial design, patient demographics and other baseline characteristics. Results from these CVOTs demonstrated the CV safety of QW GLP‐1 RAs compared with standard of care. Additionally, CV and renal benefits were demonstrated for semaglutide and dulaglutide, but not for exenatide ER. The CV safety of four DPP4is and three SGLT2is was demonstrated. None of the DPP4is had a CV or renal benefit, whereas all three SGLT2is were associated with CV and renal benefits.What is new and conclusionThis article provides an overview of the results from QW GLP‐1 RA CVOTs, including the recently published results for dulaglutide, and places them within the broader T2D treatment landscape to help HCPs make informed decisions in daily practice. The QW GLP‐1 RAs with benefits reaching beyond glycaemic control can provide a comprehensive treatment option for people with T2D at high risk of CVD, with CVD or chronic kidney disease.

Glycaemic and non-glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.

SummaryWhat is known and objectiveGlucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) may confer a range of benefits for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), which is reflected through their position within diabetes treatment guidelines. The objective of this narrative review is to explore the efficacy data of once‐weekly (QW) GLP‐1 RAs in terms of glycaemic control, body weight reduction, cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and potential renal protective effects to assist pharmacists and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) in treatment discussions with patients.MethodsThis a narrative review focused on 31 clinical trials involving the Phase 3 clinical programmes of the QW GLP‐1 RAs dulaglutide, exenatide extended‐release (ER) and semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.).Results and discussionThe clinical trials were divided by their comparator arms and examined for trends. All QW GLP‐1 RAs were superior to placebo for reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight. Data regarding QW GLP‐1 RAs versus metformin were limited, likely due to metformin’s use as the first‐line pharmacologic for T2D. In the robust head‐to‐head trials of QW versus QW GLP‐1 RAs, semaglutide s.c. was superior to both dulaglutide and exenatide ER regarding HbA1c and body weight; however, QW versus once‐daily GLP‐1 RA trials had mixed results depending on the comparators. Finally, in QW GLP‐1 RA versus insulin trials, all QW GLP‐1 RAs were as effective as insulin, particularly when hypoglycaemia and body weight were also considered. CV outcome trials demonstrated benefits in major adverse CV events and renal outcomes for semaglutide and dulaglutide.What is new and conclusionThis review collates recently published data and previously published Phase 3 results to allow pharmacists and other HCPs to understand all of the efficacy data available and the corresponding impact on treatment guidelines. QW GLP‐1 RAs are emerging as important therapeutic options for people with T2D as they offer a spectrum of benefits extending beyond glycaemic control, but it is important to be aware of their efficacy differences when prescribing and discussing them with patients.

Long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists: Findings and implications of cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common and serious comorbidity of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment has become an important aspect of evaluating new therapies for T2DM before approval by the FDA. Since 2008, in order to establish safety, new therapies for T2DM have been required to demonstrate that they will not result in an unacceptable increase in CV risk. Studies performed for this purpose are termed CV outcome trials, or CVOTs. This article reviews CVOTs completed to date for the class of long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs; liraglutide, exenatide extended-release, albiglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide injectable, semaglutide oral) and implications for clinical management of T2DM. All CVOTs have confirmed long-acting GLP-1RAs to be noninferior to (not worse than) placebo with regard to first occurrence of a primary outcome of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke). Further, a number of the studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in primary outcomes of three-point MACE with GLP-1RA treatment compared with placebo. As a result, the product labeling for liraglutide, semaglutide injectable, and dulaglutide has been updated with an indication for reducing the risk of MACE in adults with T2DM and established CVD (all) or multiple CV risk factors (dulaglutide only). These findings have brought about an exciting paradigm shift from concern about not inflicting CV harm to the exciting prospect of reducing risks of CV outcomes. Major diabetes care guidelines now encourage early consideration of GLP-1RA use in patients with atherosclerotic CVD.

Long-acting GLP-1RAs: An overview of efficacy, safety, and their role in type 2 diabetes management.

Over recent decades, an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and glucose regulation has led to innovative research and new treatment paradigms. The discovery of the gut peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and its role in glucose regulation paved the way for the class of GLP-1 receptor agonist compounds, or GLP-1RAs. The long-acting GLP-1RAs (dulaglutide, exenatide extended-release, liraglutide, semaglutide [injectable and oral]) are classified as such based on a minimum 24-hour duration of clinically relevant effects after administration. In phase 3 clinical trial programs of long-acting GLP-1RAs, A1C typically was reduced in the range of 1% to 1.5%, with reductions close to 2% in some studies. GLP-1RAs when used alone (without sulfonylureas or insulin) have a low risk of hypoglycemia because, like endogenous GLP-1, their insulinotropic effects are glucose-dependent. In addition to local actions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, GLP-1RAs stimulate receptors in the central nervous system to increase satiety, resulting in weight loss. All long-acting GLP-1RAs have, at minimum, been shown to be safe and not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk and most (liraglutide, semaglutide injectable, dulaglutide, albiglutide) have been shown in CV outcomes trials (CVOTs) to significantly reduce the risk of major cardiac adverse events. The class has good tolerability overall, with generally transient GI adverse events being most common. The weekly injectable agents offer scheduling convenience and may promote treatment adherence. One long-acting GLP-1RA is available as an oral daily tablet, which may be preferable for some patients and providers.

Exenatide extended release in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without residual insulin production.

To test whether a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist would improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to determine whether the presence of residual beta cell function would affect the response. In addition, we sought to determine whether the drug would affect beta cell function. We performed a randomized placebo-controlled trial of exenatide extended release (ER) in participants with T1D with and without detectable levels of C-peptide. Seventy-nine participants were randomized to exenatide ER 2 mcg weekly, or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of detectable C-peptide levels. The primary outcome was the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 24 weeks. Participants were followed for another 6 months off study drug. At week 24, the time of the primary outcome, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c level was 7.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.42, 8.10) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.0% (95% CI 7.64, 8.35) in the placebo group (P = 0.08). At week 12 the LS mean HbA1c levels were 7.71% (95% CI 7.37, 8.05) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.05% (95% CI 7.7, 8.4) in the placebo group (P = 0.01). The improvement at week 12 was driven mainly by those with detectable levels of C-peptide. Those treated with exenatide ER lost weight at 12 and 24 weeks compared to those treated with placebo (P <0.001 and P = 0.007). The total insulin dose was lower, but not when corrected for body weight, and was not affected by residual insulin production. Adverse events were more frequent with exenatide ER, but hypoglycaemia was not increased. Treatment with exenatide ER may have short-term benefits in some individuals with T1D who are overweight or who have detectable levels of C-peptide, but short-term improvements were not sustained.

A 6-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of weekly exenatide in adolescents with obesity.

Pharmacological treatment options for adolescents with obesity are very limited. Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist could be a treatment option for adolescent obesity. To investigate the effect of exenatide extended release on body mass index (BMI)-SDS as primary outcome, and glucose metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors, liver steatosis, and other BMI metrics as secondary outcomes, and its safety and tolerability in adolescents with obesity. Six-month, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients (n = 44, 10-18 years, females n = 22) with BMI-SDS > 2.0 or age-adapted-BMI > 30 kg/m2 according to WHO were included. Patients received lifestyle intervention and were randomized to exenatide extended release 2 mg (n = 22) or placebo (n = 22) subcutaneous injections given once weekly. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were conducted at the beginning and end of the intervention. Exenatide reduced (P < .05) BMI-SDS (-0.09; -0.18, 0.00), % BMI 95th percentile (-2.9%; -5.4, -0.3), weight (-3 kg; -5.8, -0.1), waist circumference (-3.2 cm; -5.8, -0.7), subcutaneous adipose tissue (-552 cm3 ; -989, -114), 2-hour-glucose during OGTT (-15.3 mg/dL; -27.5, -3.1), total cholesterol (11.6 mg/dL; -21.7, -1.5), and BMI (-0.83 kg/m2 ; -1.68, 0.01) without significant change in liver fat content (-1.36; -3.12, 0.4; P = .06) in comparison to placebo. Safety and tolerability profiles were comparable to placebo with the exception of mild adverse events being more frequent in exenatide-treated patients. Treatment of adolescents with severe obesity with extended-release exenatide is generally well tolerated and leads to a modest reduction in BMI metrics and improvement in glucose tolerance and cholesterol. The study indicates that the treatment provides additional beneficial effects beyond BMI reduction for the patient group.