Excitatory Latencies Research Articles

Early-life stress induces anxiety-like behaviors and activity imbalances in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala in adult rats.

Early-life stress increases the prevalence of psychiatric diseases associated with emotional dysregulation. Emotional regulation requires the inhibitory influence of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) on amygdalar activity, and dysfunction of this system is believed to induce anxiety. Because mPFC and amygdala have dense reciprocal connections and projections between them continue to develop until adolescence, early-life stress may impair the function of this circuit and cause emotional dysregulation. We examined the effects of stress during circuit development on anxiety-like behaviors, neural activities in the mPFC and amygdala, and impulse transmission in the mPFC-amygdala circuit in adult rats. Early-life stress, unpredictable stress twice a day for 12 days following early weaning, increased anxiety-like behaviors in the open-field and elevated plus-maze tests. In the open-field test, stress altered Fos expression in the mPFC and amygdala. Compared to non-stressed rats, which were exposed to neither unpredictable stress nor early weaning, stressed rats exhibited decreased Fos expression in the right superficial layers of the infralimbic cortex and increased Fos expression in the right basolateral amygdala and both sides of the central amygdala. Electrophysiological analysis revealed that excitatory latencies of mPFC neurons to amygdalar stimulation in stressed rats were significantly longer than control rats in the right, but not left, hemisphere. Stress had no effect on excitatory latencies of amygdalar neurons to mPFC stimulation in the mPFC-amygdala circuits in the both hemisphere. These data suggest that early-life stress impairs the mPFC-amygdala circuit development, resulting in imbalanced mPFC and amygdala activities and anxiety-like behaviors.

Detection of submillisecond spike timing differences based on delay-line anticoincidence detection

Detection of submillisecond interaural timing differences is the basis for sound localization in reptiles, birds, and mammals. Although comparative studies reveal that different neural circuits underlie this ability, they also highlight common solutions to an inherent challenge: processing information on timescales shorter than an action potential. Discrimination of small timing differences is also important for species recognition during communication among mormyrid electric fishes. These fishes generate a species-specific electric organ discharge (EOD) that is encoded into submillisecond-to-millisecond timing differences between receptors. Small, adendritic neurons (small cells) in the midbrain are thought to analyze EOD waveform by comparing these differences in spike timing, but direct recordings from small cells have been technically challenging. In the present study we use a fluorescent labeling technique to obtain visually guided extracellular recordings from individual small cell axons. We demonstrate that small cells receive 1-2 excitatory inputs from 1 or more receptive fields with latencies that vary by over 10 ms. This wide range of excitatory latencies is likely due to axonal delay lines, as suggested by a previous anatomic study. We also show that inhibition of small cells from a calyx synapse shapes stimulus responses in two ways: through tonic inhibition that reduces spontaneous activity and through precisely timed, stimulus-driven, feed-forward inhibition. Our results reveal a novel delay-line anticoincidence detection mechanism for processing submillisecond timing differences, in which excitatory delay lines and precisely timed inhibition convert a temporal code into a population code.

Acoustic Clicks Activate both the Canal and Otolith Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Pathways in Behaving Monkeys

Acoustic activation of the vestibular system has been well documented in humans and animal models. In the past decade, sound-evoked myogenic potentials in the sternocleidomastoid muscle (cVEMP) and the extraocular muscles (oVEMP) have been extensively studied, and their potentials as new tests for vestibular function have been widely recognized. However, the extent to which sound activates the otolith and canal pathways remains controversial. In the present study, we examined this issue in a recently developed nonhuman primate model of acoustic activation of the vestibular system, i.e., sound-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflexes (VOR) in behaving monkeys. To determine whether the canal and otolith VOR pathways are activated by sound, we analyzed abducens neurons' responses to clicks that were delivered into either ear. The main finding was that clicks evoked short-latency excitatory responses in abducens neurons on both sides. The latencies of the two responses, however, were different. The mean latency of the contralateral and ipsilateral abducens neurons was 2.44 +/- 0.4 and 1.65 +/- 0.28 ms, respectively. A further analysis of the excitatory latencies, in combination with the known canal and otolith VOR pathways, suggests that the excitatory responses of the contralateral abducens neurons were mediated by the contralateral disynaptic VOR pathways that connect the lateral canal to the contralateral abducens neurons, and the excitatory responses of the ipsilateral abducens neurons were mediated by the ipsilateral monosynaptic VOR pathways that connect the utricle to the ipsilateral abducens neurons. These results provide new insights into the understanding of the neural basis for sound-evoked vestibular responses, which is essential for developing new tests for both canal and otolith functions in humans.

Convergence and Interaction of Hippocampal and Amygdalar Projections within the Prefrontal Cortex in the Rat

The orbital and medial prefrontal cortex (OMPFC) receives inputs from the CA1/subicular (CA1/S) region of the ventral hippocampus and the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA). Despite many studies about these projections, little is known as to how CA1/S and BLA inputs converge and interact within the OMPFC. Extracellular recordings of single-unit activity in the OMPFC were performed in sodium pentobarbitone-anesthetized rats. OMPFC neurons driven by CA1/S or BLA stimulation were more frequently encountered in the ventral portion of the prelimbic (v-PrL) and infralimbic cortex (IL). OMPFC neurons showing excitatory convergence of both inputs from the CA1/S and BLA were also located predominantly in the v-PrL and IL. The excitatory latencies of these neurons from both the CA1/S and BLA revealed almost identical values. Excitatory responses of OMPFC neurons to CA1/S (or BLA) stimulation were markedly augmented by simultaneous BLA (or CA1/S) stimulation, whereas the inhibitory influence of the BLA (or CA1/S) on CA1/S-induced (or BLA-induced) excitation was apparent when BLA (or CA1/S) stimulation was given 20-40 msec before CA1/S (or BLA) stimulation. Similar results were also observed when reciprocal connections between the CA1/S and BLA were severed to exclude the influences of these connections on one another. From these studies, we concluded that excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the hippocampus and amygdala converge and interact in the v-PrL and IL. Furthermore, the results indicate that simultaneous activation of hippocampal and amygdalar neurons may be important for amplification of OMPFC neuronal activity.

Multiple Components of Ipsilaterally Evoked Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus

The central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc) receives a large number of convergent inputs that are both excitatory and inhibitory. Although excitatory inputs typically are evoked by stimulation of the contralateral ear, inhibitory inputs can be recruited by either ear. Here we evaluate ipsilaterally evoked inhibition in single ICc cells in awake Mexican free-tailed bats. The principal question we addressed concerns the degree to which ipsilateral inhibition at the ICc suppresses contralaterally evoked discharges and thus creates the excitatory-inhibitory (EI) properties of ICc neurons. To study ipsilaterally evoked inhibition, we iontophoretically applied excitatory neurotransmitters and visualized the ipsilateral inhibition as a gap in the carpet of background activity evoked by the transmitters. Ipsilateral inhibition was seen in 86% of ICc cells. The inhibition in most cells had both glycinergic and GABAergic components that could be blocked by the iontophoretic application of bicuculline and strychnine. In 80% of the cells that were inhibited, the ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral excitation were temporally coincident. In many of these cells, the ipsilateral inhibition suppressed contralateral discharges and thus generated the cell's EI property in the ICc. In other cells, the ipsilateral inhibition was coincident with the initial portion of the excitation, but the inhibition was only 2-4 ms in duration and suppressed only the first few contralaterally evoked discharges. The suppression was so slight that it often could not be detected as a decrease in the spike count generated by increasing ipsilateral intensities. Twenty percent of the cells that expressed inhibition, however, had inhibitory latencies that were longer than the excitatory latencies. In these neurons, the inhibition arrived too late to suppress most or any of the discharges. Finally, in the majority of cells, the ipsilateral inhibition persisted for tens of milliseconds beyond the duration of the signal that evoked it. Thus ipsilateral inhibition has multiple components and one or more of these components are typically evoked in ICc neurons by sound received at the ipsilateral ear.

Neural processes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised cat investigated from unit responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve

Extracellular responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus single units were recorded in response to biphasic, bipolar electrical stimulation of spiral ganglion cells and their peripheral processes using a banded electrode array in the scala tympani of the barbiturate anaesthetised cat. The DCN responses to this stimulus were the result of excitatory and suppressive (including inhibitory) processes. The excitatory responses from DCN units were usually within a range of 1.8–2.8 ms and these responses were probably the result of monosynaptic input from the auditory nerve. Latencies > 2.8 ms were most likely due to activation of di- and poly-synaptic pathways from auditory nerve fibres, except that latencies between 3.5–4.75 in hearing animals could have arisen from electrophonic mechanisms. Suppression of spontaneous activity was usually long acting, lasting > 70 ms following each pulse of the pulse train, but short acting suppression with a latency of 3.5–4.75 ms and a duration of < 10 ms was occasionally observed. These suppressive responses probably resulted from synaptic inhibitory input, but neural membrane properties may have contributed. In hearing animals, excitatory latencies within the range 1.8–5.2 ms were similar for units with different response area types or different PSTH patterns in response to acoustic CF tones or noise.