Excision Of Exostosis Research Articles

Transcanal Excision of Exostoses: Large Series Comparing Bone Removal Methods.

External auditory exostosis (EAE) is a condition of progressive temporal bone growth into the external auditory canal most commonly from repeat cold water and wind exposure. Several tools have been utilized for EAE excision with varying implications for intra- and postoperative complications. However, comparisons of osteotome and microdrill are made difficult due to the few published cases and intervariability between surgeons. Furthermore, evidence is needed to analyze the safety of novel supplemental tools such as the piezoelectric bone-cutting device. Retrospective chart review. Medical clinic and surgery center. A total of 413 subjects representing 472 earsmet the inclusion criteria. Of which 159 ears were operated on using osteotome alone (OA), 271 using osteotome with a drill (OD), and 42 with osteotome with piezoelectric (OP). Charts were analyzed for the most reported intraoperative complications and postoperative symptoms and complications. There were no significant differences in the rate of tympanic membrane perforations nor in total intraoperative complications between OA, OD, or OP. The OD group contained the only nonperforation intraoperative event. OA had the lowest or near lowest incidence of all symptoms analyzed. OA showed a significantly lower incidence of tinnitus when compared to OD and OP. We found that OA performed the best, though not statistically significant in most measures, with regard to mitigating rates of complications postsurgery. Our findings suggest OA provides lower risk intraoperatively and postoperatively for patients undergoing transcanal exostosis excision.

Excision of distal ulnar exostosis: A case series and literature review

BackgroundMultiple Hereditary Exostoses with distal ulnar exostosis often results in forearm deformity and functional restrictions. Literature reported variable outcomes and frequent complications with an aggressive approach of ulna lengthening. The role of distal ulnar exostosis excision remained uncertain with contradictory effect in restoring growth. Our study aimed to report our outcome of simple excision and compare with the reported results in literature. MethodRetrospective review was carried out in patients with distal ulnar exostoses excision who were operated from 2003 to 2011. Patients with less than 3 years of follow-up, radial head dislocation or subluxation, or within 3 years of skeletal maturity were excluded. Clinical outcome including range of forearm rotation was documented. Radiological outcomes including radial articular angle, carpal slip, ulnar variance and radial bowing were measured. The results were analysed statistically and compared with literature. ResultsFive cases were included in our study. All had excision of exostosis, and one case had additional ulnar lengthening. Mean age of operation was 10.4 years. Mean follow-up time was 72 months. Improvement was shown in the range of pronation, radial articular angle, carpal slip and ulnar variance, in the cases with simple excision alone. Improvements were mostly achieved at the first postoperative year. However, for the case with concomitant lengthening, ulna shortened relatively with growth, and complications were reported. This phenomenon is in keeping with the literature finding. ConclusionSimple excision of distal ulnar exostosis improves forearm rotation and provides some restoration of growth in skeletally immature patients with Masada type I deformity.

The Use of an Ultrasonic Serrated Knife in Transcanal Excision of Exostoses

To describe a novel approach for excision of exostoses and evaluate the outcomes of transcanal excision of exostoses using ultrasonic serrated knife-assistance versus microosteotomes only. Retrospective analysis. Academic Tertiary Care Center. Patients receiving a transcanal excision of exostoses between 2007 and 2016. The outcomes and postoperative complications of 138 patients who received transcanal microosteotome only technique were compared to 10 patients who received transcanal excision of exostoses using ultrasonic serrated knife-assistance (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI). A total of 175 ears in 128 patients underwent a transcanal microosteotome only technique. Of these, 11 (6.3%) developed an intraoperative tympanic membrane perforation. One developed anterior canal mobilization requiring prolonged (3 wk) packing. One hundred thirty-five ears (77%) were well healed by the 3-week postoperative visit. All but one ear was well healed by the 6-week visit. In comparison, 11 ears in 10 patients were treated for exostoses using a transcanal approach with the use of ultrasonic serrated knife and microosteotomes. One ear canal (the first in the series) was not well healed by the 3-week postoperative visit due to suspected thermal injury. All patients had well-healed ear canals by 6 weeks, and there were no complications. This is the first series to report the use of an ultrasonic serrated knife in the transcanal excision of exostoses. When compared with a transcanal microosteotome only excision of exostoses, the addition of the Sonopet seems to result in a similarly low complication rate. Sonopet can allow for more controlled transcanal excision of broad-based exostoses in patients with severe obstruction.

Transcanal Micro-Osteotome Only Technique for Excision of Exostoses.

To evaluate the outcomes and complications of transcanal excision of exostoses using micro-osteotomes, without a postauricular incision or the use of the drill. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing exostoses excision. Tertiary Care Medical Center. All of the patients underwent surgical removal of the exostoses using only a 1 or 2 mm micro-osteotomes. Patients were followed postoperatively and associated complications were evaluated. One-hundred thirty-eight ears in 106 patients were treated for obstructive exostosis. The average age of patients was 43 ± 16 years. Of these, 99 were man (93%) and 7 were woman (7%). A majority of the patients (84%, n = 89) had 90 to 100% obstruction of the ear canal. Complete ear canal healing was observed in 80% of patients by 3 weeks. All but one patient had healed by 6 weeks postoperatively. There were 9 (6.5%) slit tympanic membrane perforations that healed with intraoperative gelfoam or fascia myringoplasty. One patient had an anterior canal mobilization which required Xeroform packing for 3 weeks for stabilization. There were no postoperative vertigo, facial paresis, conductive/sensorineural hearing loss, soft tissue stenoses, and no skin grafting required. This is the first study to report a series of patients performing solely a transcanal approach using micro-osteotomes for removing exostoses. Results indicate that it is a safe procedure with low complication rate and expeditious healing. Patients with 100% obstruction can have this procedure performed with no significant increase in morbidity.

Transcanal Micro‐osteotome Technique for Excision of Exostoses

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes and complications of transcanal excision of exostoses using micro-osteotomes without a post-auricular incision or the use of the drill. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing exostoses excision by the senior author from January 2007 to January 2014 was carried out. All patients underwent surgical removal of the exostoses using a 1 or 2 mm micro-osteotome. Patients were followed postoperatively and complications were evaluated. Results: One-hundred-thirty-eight ears in 106 patients were treated for exostosis. Average age of patients was 43 ± 16 year old. Of these, 99 were males (93%) and 7 were females (7%). A majority of the patients had 90% to 100% obstruction of the ear canal. Complete ear canal healing was seen in 80% of patients by 3 weeks. All but one patient had healed by 6 weeks postoperatively. There were 9 (6.5%) slit tympanic membrane perforations that all healed. One patient had an anterior canal mobilization which required Xeroform packing for 3 weeks for stabilization. There was no postoperative vertigo, facial paresis, conductive/sensorineural hearing loss, soft tissue stenoses, and no skin grafting was required. Conclusions: A transcanal approach using micro-osteotomes for removing exostoses is feasible. The transcanal approach afforded shorter healing times than the post-auricular approach as reported in the literature. Patients with 100% obstruction can have this procedure performed with no significant increase in morbidity.

Subacromial impingement syndrome in a patient with hereditary multiple exostosis: a case report

BackgroundHereditary multiple exostosis (HME) is characterised by multiple osteochondromas that are distributed throughout the skeleton, invariably involving the shoulder girdle. Tumours within the subacromial space can cause secondary irritation of the rotator cuff and result in subacromial impingement syndrome.Case presentationWe describe a 19 year old female patient with HME who presented with subacromial impingement syndrome secondary to a benign exostosis originating from the spine of the scapular and projecting into the subacromial space.ConclusionThe unique aspects of this report was that the origin of the exostosis, which was not observed on early standard radiographs of the shoulder, and the use of arthroscopic excision of the exostosis. Hence we believe a low threshold for additional imaging, such as a magnetic resonance imaging, should be considered for patients with HME with subacromial impingement syndrome to ensure a symptomatic exostosis is not neglected. Arthroscopic excision of a benign subacromial exostosis is effective, offering a minimally invasive approach with relief of the patient’s symptoms.

Modified Ilizarov technique for the treatment of forearm deformities in multiple cartilaginous exostoses: case series and literature review

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of gradual ulnar correction and lengthening using the modified Ilizarov technique for the treatment of forearm deformities in patients with multiple cartilaginous exostoses. We retrospectively reviewed 23 forearms in 16 patients. Three different types of operative procedures were performed: (1) corrective osteotomy and gradual lengthening of the ulna, (2) corrective osteotomy of the radius, and (3) excision of exostoses. We evaluated the radiographs; range of motion of the wrist, forearm, and elbow; and functional status using a questionnaire before and after operation. During the clinical interview, post-operative functional status was significantly improved than pre-operative functional status, 12 patients stated that they had no difficulty in performing daily activities, 11 patients stated that they had no pain, and 11 patients stated that the post-operative appearance of the operated forearm was satisfactory. At time of final follow-up, the mean range of motion of the wrist in ulnar/radial deviation, forearm pronation/supination was significantly improved. Also, the radiographic parameters including radial articular angle, carpal slip, radial bowing, and ulnar variance were significantly improved at time of final follow-up. In conclusion, we achieved successful clinical and radiological outcomes in our patients with forearm deformities after treatment with the modified Ilizarov method. However, there could be a recurrence of ulnar shortening and deformity during growth periods in skeletally immature patients.

Pyrolytic Carbon Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint of the Finger

Pyrolytic carbon resurfacing arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint has been reported to provide favorable results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pyrolytic carbon joint replacement at an average follow-up of fifty-five months. A retrospective review of thirty-one arthroplasties of the proximal interphalangeal joint performed by a single surgeon in seventeen patients with interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis was conducted. Assessment included range of motion, patient satisfaction, and pain scores. Radiographs were evaluated for alignment, implant subsidence, and implant failure. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire was administered at the time of the final follow-up. The average follow-up period was fifty-five months (minimum, two years). No patient was lost to follow-up. The arc of motion of the interphalangeal joint decreased from 57° preoperatively to 31° (p < 0.05) at the time of the final follow-up. The average score for pain was 3 of 10 on a visual analog scale. Satisfaction averaged 3.4 points on a 5-point Likert scale, and twelve of seventeen patients stated that they would repeat the surgery. Data from the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were compared for the involved and noninvolved hands of the fifteen patients who received implants unilaterally. Significant deficits were observed in the total outcome score, activities of daily living, function, and satisfaction for the operatively treated hand. Pain was also greater in the operatively treated hand. Complications included implant fracture (one joint), dislocation (five joints), squeaking (eleven), loosening (fifteen), and interphalangeal joint contracture (twenty). Six joints required a reoperation (an arthrodesis in four joints, a silicone arthroplasty in one, and excision of exostosis in one). Implant migration was severe for seven proximal phalanx implants and three distal phalanx implants, and one implant breached the phalangeal cortex. Interphalangeal joint motion decreased significantly at the final follow-up evaluation, following short-term gains in the initial postoperative period. Complications were numerous, and implant loosening with migration was a major problem. Arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a pyrolytic carbon implant has a high complication rate, poor outcomes, and variable patient satisfaction. On the basis of these findings, we no longer use this implant in our practice.

Long-Term Results of Surgery for Forearm Deformities in Patients with Multiple Cartilaginous Exostoses

Surgical treatment of forearm deformities in patients with multiple cartilaginous exostoses remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to determine the reasonable indications for operative treatment and to evaluate long-term results of forearm surgery in these patients. We retrospectively reviewed twenty-three patients (thirty-one forearms) after a mean duration of follow-up of nearly thirteen years. The mean age at the time of the initial procedure was eleven years. The patients underwent a variety of surgical procedures, including excision of exostoses; corrective procedures (lengthening of the radius or ulna and/or corrective osteotomy of the radius and/or ulna) and open reduction or excision of a dislocated radial head. Clinical evaluation involved the assessment of pain, activities of daily living, the cosmetic outcome, and the ranges of motion of the wrist, forearm, and elbow. The radiographic parameters that were assessed were ulnar variance, the radial articular angle, and carpal slip. Four patients had mild pain, and five patients had mild restriction of daily activities at the time of follow-up. Eight patients stated that the appearance of the forearm was unsatisfactory. Radiographic parameters (ulnar variance, radial articular angle, carpal slip) were initially improved; however, at the time of the final follow-up visit, the deformities had again progressed and showed no significant improvement. The only procedure that was associated with complications was ulnar lengthening. Complications included nonunion (three forearms), fracture of callus at the site of lengthening (two forearms), and temporary radial nerve paresis following an ulnar distraction osteotomy (one forearm). Excision of exostoses significantly improved the range of pronation (p = 0.036). In our patients with multiple cartilaginous exostoses, corrective osteotomy and/or lengthening of forearm bones was not beneficial. The most beneficial procedure was excision of exostoses. Reasonable indications for forearm surgery in these patients are (1) to improve forearm rotation and (2) to improve the appearance.

Reconstruction of forearm deformities in multiple cartilaginous exostoses

The management of complex forearm deformities in patients with multiple cartilaginous exostoses is controversial. The objective of this study is to look into the outcome of treatment with the combined use of ulna lengthening, radial osteotomy, and excision of exostosis in our six patients, who all had Masada type 1 deformity of the forearm. Clinical assessment was performed using the pre- and postoperative range of motion of the wrist, forearm and elbow. The chief symptom each patient had was noted as well as the demographic data of all patients. Radiological assessment was performed by checking the degree of negative ulna variance, the radial articular angle, and the degree of carpal slip. The degree of satisfaction of the patients and their parents were noted. Good clinical and radiological results were obtained at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. All patients and parents were satisfied and there was no recurrence of deformity in the latest follow-up. The authors believe in early and aggressive treatment of Masada type 1 deformity of the wrist and forearm for multiple cartilaginous exostoses with a combination of excision of exostosis, ulna lengthening and radial osteotomy.