Excessive Sedation Research Articles

A FALTA DE CAPACITAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL PELA SUBSTITUIÇÃO DE BENZODIAZEPÍNICOS POR FITOTERÁPICOS

The prolonged and indiscriminate use of benzodiazepines is a public health problem due to the associated risks, such as dependence, excessive sedation, cognitive issues, and falls, particularly among the elderly. Self-medication and the improper use of these drugs increase the likelihood of adverse effects, which are worsened by the lack of appropriate therapeutic alternatives, such as phytotherapy. Pharmacists play a crucial role in guiding patients on the rational use of these medications, identifying signs of abuse, and promoting safer treatments. Collaboration between doctors, psychologists, and pharmacists can help reduce dependence and improve therapeutic efficacy. Public awareness policies and the integration of healthcare services are essential to combat excessive use and promote proper treatment of mental disorders. Phytotherapeutic alternatives, such as Passiflora incarnata, have shown promise in managing anxiety and insomnia, providing safer options. However, it is important that their use is also supervised, as, despite being natural, these substances can cause adverse effects if misused. The combination of conventional treatments and natural alternatives, with proper professional guidance, can contribute to a more balanced and effective therapeutic approach.

Drug prescriptions in elderly hospitalized patients with cognitive impairment in the Italian Dementia Friendly Hospital project.

The aim of the study was to characterize drug prescription patterns in elderly patients hospitalized in acute wards as a function of cognitive status and staff training. We recorded clinical parameters reflecting health status and drug prescriptions at admission, during hospital stay, and at discharge before and after a short staff training on the needs of aged cognitively impaired patients. Participants aged 65 and older had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥16. The number of prescriptions, sedative and anticholinergic load, and drug-drug interactions were evaluated. Of the 116 older patients analyzed, 59 patients were cognitively impaired, and 57 were cognitively normal with an MMSE value > 24. Fifty-nine patients (28 CN, 31 CI) were assisted by the hospital health staff after training. Participants presented a widespread polypharmacy. Cognitively impaired patients received more prescriptions, more inappropriate prescriptions, had a greater sedative load, and were exposed to more interactions. Staff training had no effect on the prescription pattern. The results suggest that hospitalized cognitively impaired patients are overprescribed psychotropic drugs and have an excessive sedative and anticholinergic load. Interventions designed to improve dementia care practices in health staff that are not also designed to manage drug polypharmacy do not modify prescription patterns.

Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation

BackgroundIntravenous sedation is an important tool for managing invasively ventilated patients, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias. Research questionWhat is the association between sex, race and ethnicity, and sedation practices? MethodsWe performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for 24 hours or more using the MIMIC-IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, USA. We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female, male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes. Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score. We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative, then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose. We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). ResultsWe studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic and 80% White. Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 (36%) patients. Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (OR for more benzodiazepine 0.66, CrI 0.49-0.92). Propofol was administered to 3,865 (57%) patients. Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (OR for more propofol 0.72, CrI 0.61-0.86). Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 (21%) patients, and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity. Female patients were less sedated than male patients (OR for deeper sedation 0.71, CrI 0.62 to 0.81), and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (OR for more sedated 1.28, CrI 1.05 to 1.55). InterpretationAmong patients invasively ventilated for at least 24 hours, intravenous sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and race and ethnicity. Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.

Sedative effects of propofol and risk factors for excessive sedation in the endoscopic treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases.

The safety and effectiveness of propofol in more complex endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, remain unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate propofol sedation during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ultrasound-guided intervention, and gastroduodenal stenting and examine risk factors for excessive sedation. We retrospectively analyzed data from 870 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment with propofol sedation for biliary and pancreatic disease between October 2020 and September 2021. Sedation included propofol and fentanyl, with continuous monitoring of vital signs and the bispectral index. The assessed risk factors included age, complications, body mass index, treatment duration, and specialty. Distal bile duct treatment (n = 367), hilar bile duct treatment (n = 197), post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment (n = 75), endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention (n = 140), and gastrointestinal obstruction treatment (n = 91) were performed. The rates of excessive sedation, hypoxemia, and hypotension were 7.8%, 6.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. Post-small-intestinal reconstruction treatment had the highest incidence rate of excessive sedation (16%), whereas endoscopic ultrasound-guided intervention had the lowest incidence rate (4.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between excessive sedation and comorbid sleep apnea, obesity, and prolonged procedural time. Obesity, sleep apnea syndrome, and prolonged procedure time are risk factors for excessive sedation related to propofol use. Thus, sedation techniques should be tailored for these patients.

Serratiopeptidase with diclofenac sodium for the management of post-operative pain and inflammation in a day care obstetric and gynaecological surgeries

Management of acute post-operative pain and swelling after the obstetric and gynaecological (OBG) surgeries is crucial part of patient care. Reduction or complete elimination of post-operative pain & swelling, without excessive sedation is the most preferred treatment strategy helping patient’s recovery in terms of rapid mobilization and return to independence. Serratiopeptidase a proteolytic enzyme used for its anti-inflammatory properties. Diclofenac Sodium is commonly used to treat the pain and swelling. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of the fixed dose combination (FDC) of Serratiopeptidase (10 mg) with Diclofenac Sodium (50 mg) gastro-resistant tablets in day care OBG surgery. This was a single centre, retrospective, observational data collection in real-life scenario. Data of adult women who had undergone day care OBG surgery and received a FDC of Serratiopeptidase (10 mg) with Diclofenac Sodium (50 mg) gastro-resistant tablets TID for period of 24 hours was retrieved and analysed. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) data on post-operative pain at rest and pain on movement as well as post-operative swelling were analyzed in conjunction with monitoring for adverse events. Among 61 patient’s data included in the study, 40 (65.57%) had undergone Minimally Invasive Vaginal Hysterectomy (MIVH), 4 (6.56%) had MIVH with Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy, and 17 (27.87%) had other OBG surgeries. The average VAS scores for pain at rest (VAS), pain on movement (VAS) and swelling were significantly reduced compared to baseline at all-time points (p>0.001). Clinical global impression of efficacy and safety for 95% physician’s and 93.3% patients was good to very good. FDC was found to be well tolerated without any serious adverse reaction. The results of this clinical study confirms the effectiveness and tolerability of FDC of Serratiopeptidase and Diclofenac sodium in day care OBG surgeries in the early post-operative period.

A Randomised Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine-Ropivacaine Versus Fentanyl-Ropivacaine for Epidural Labour Analgesia.

Background An epidural block is a superior potent approach to labour analgesia, and ropivacaine combined with fentanyl has been successfully practised for it. Dexmedetomidine, as a novel form of labour analgesia, must be researched further. Our study results give insight into the epidural block and come up with a pioneering approach for labour analgesia. Methodology A total of 68 parturients were assigned to two equal groups and received either dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine (Group RD) or fentanylwith ropivacaine (Group RF). Parturients received a loading dose and maintenance was given using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Analgesia onset time, labour duration, rescue dose requirement, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were noted. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) scores of newborns, Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores of mothers, and maternal side effects were observed. Results Group RDshowed a shorter onset time of analgesia (group RD: 12.50 ± 1.31 minutes vs. group RF: 15.26 ± 1.46 min), less local anaesthetics requirement (group RD: 47.54 ±5.37 ml vs. group RF: 59.05 ± 6.62 ml), less number of bolus doses (group RD: 0.15 ± 0.36 vs. group RF: 1.21 ± 0.95), and shorter duration from the epidural administration to the delivery (group RD: 312.97 ± 42.40 minutes vs. group RF: 345.94 ±14.67 minutes) than group RF. VAS values of the RD group were significantly less than the RF group. The RSS scores were comparably low in both groups, and excessive sedation was not seen in any group. Newborn APGAR values were comparably on the higher side in the two groups. Adverse effects were observed in the two groups, like hypotension, nausea/vomiting, bradycardia, shivering, and pruritus, which were insignificant. Conclusion The RD group showed an improved analgesic effect with a quicker onset of action,reduced requirement of local anaesthetics, and lower VAS scores compared to the RF group. With ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine shows more efficacy than fentanyl during epidural block and is a safe alternative for labour pain management.

Prospective case series study on the use of a novel analgosedation protocol for ultrasound-guided catheterization in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Our study represents the very first step towards the design of a validated protocol for analgosedation during ultrasound-guided CICC insertion in NICU. • Critically ill newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit often require a centrally inserted central catheter. • Achieving an appropriate level of sedation and analgesia is paramount for procedure success and patient safety, avoiding the potential risks associated with excessive deep sedation. • The use of this new protocol for analgosedation is able to achieve a good level of sedation and pain control without significant adverse event. • Ultrasound-guided CICC insertion can be performed even in non-ventilated newborns.

Respiratory Depression Following Intraoperative Methadone: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Methadone is used as a perioperative analgesic in the management of postoperative pain. Despite positive outcomes from randomized trials favoring methadone, concerns about its safety persist, particularly regarding respiratory depression (RD) and excessive sedation. In this study, we compared the incidence of naloxone administration between patients administered intraoperative methadone and those administered intraoperative morphine as a measure of severe RD. Time spent at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was used as a proxy variable for excessive sedation. This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery between March 2019 and March 2023 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. We assessed the association between intraoperative administration of either methadone or morphine and postoperative naloxone administration within the first 24 hours using logistic regression (primary outcome). An analogous linear regression model was used for the secondary outcome of time spent in the PACU after surgery. Patients were weighted using propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding variables. A total of 14,522 patients were included in the analysis. Among the 2437 patients who received intraoperative methadone, 15 (0.62%) patients received naloxone within the first 24 hours after surgery compared to 68 of 12,0885 (0.56%) who received intraoperative morphine. No statistical difference was observed in the odds of naloxone administration between patients administered methadone or morphine (adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 [0.40-2.02]). Patients who were administered intraoperative methadone had a mean PACU length of stay (LOS) of 334 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 382) compared to 195 minutes (SD, 228) for those administered intraoperative morphine. The adjusted PACU LOS of patients administered intraoperative methadone was 26% longer compared to those administered intraoperative morphine (adjusted ratio of the geometric means 95% CI, 1.26 [1.22-1.31]). The incidence of naloxone administration to treat severe RD was low. No difference was observed in the odds of naloxone administration to treat severe RD between patients administered intraoperative methadone or intraoperative morphine. Intraoperative methadone was associated with longer stays at the PACU; however, this result should be interpreted with care. Our findings suggest that intraoperative methadone has a safety profile comparable to that of morphine with regard to severe RD.

Electro-tranquilization in the relief of pre-nosological forms of psychosomatic disorders

Tranquilizers, widely used in the treatment of distress, neuroses, and psychosomatic disorders, have excessive sedative effect and narcogenicity. Transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) (electrotranquilization — ET, transcranial electrical stimulation) as non-pharmacological impact with a tranquilizing effect is devoid of these disadvantages. The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of using ET in relation to distress, somatization, depression, and anxiety as the initial manifestations of psychosomatic disorders. Methods. Eighty patients who consulted a psychotherapist for somato-vegetative disorders were randomly divided into a group that received weekly ET treatment and a group that received placebo treatment. The severity of disorders and their dynamics were assessed using the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ). Results. After a week of ET treatment, rates of anxiety, depression, somatization, and distress decreased. Conclusions. The use of ET in patients with psychosomatic disorders at a pre-nosology stage leads to a significant reduction in the severit y of these disorders.

Comparison of the effects of two amino acids, Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and L-theanine, on sedation, anxiety, and cognition in preoperative surgical patients – A randomized controlled study

Abstract Background and Aims: Preoperational anxiety affects the outcome of anesthesia and surgery. Benzodiazepines impair psychomotor performance and cause excessive sedation. L-theanine is a unique amino acid found in green tea. It prevents stress, produces anxiolysis, modulates alpha activity, and provides beneficial effects on mental state, including sleep quality. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-proteinogenic amino acid and a phytochemical that is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. It is beneficial in anxiety and stress regulation. Hence, alternative premedicants such as L-theanine and GABA will have a widespread appeal and are safer. The primary objective was to study and compare the effects of L-theanine and GABA on preoperative anxiety, sedation, and cognition in patients posted for major elective surgeries. The secondary objective was to study adverse reactions. Material and Methods: A total of 168 patients aged between 18 and 55 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I and II, and satisfying all inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three groups that received either oral L-theanine, oral GABA, or oral alprazolam 0.25 mg. The anxiety score, sedation score, and psychomotor and cognitive performance scores were noted 60 minutes before and after the administration of the drugs. Results: Alprazolam produced more sedation than GABA and L-theanine (P = 0.0001). Psychomotor and cognitive functions improved with L-theanine and GABA (P = 0.0001) and decreased with alprazolam (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: GABA and L-theanine result in effective preoperative anxiolysis with minimal sedation and improvement of cognitive skills.

Impact of Sedation Protocols on Elderly Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation and Off-Line Weaning

The proportion of elderly patients in intensive care is increasing, and a significant proportion of them require mechanical ventilation. How to implement safe and effective mechanical ventilation for elderly patients, and when appropriate off-line is an important issue in the field of critical care medicine. Appropriate sedation can improve patient outcomes, but excessive sedation may lead to prolonged mechanical ventilation and increase the risk of complications. Elderly patients should be closely monitored and evaluated on an individual basis while offline, and the sedation regimen should be dynamically adjusted. This requires the healthcare team to consider the patient’s sedation needs, disease status, and pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the drug to arrive at the best strategy. Although the current research has provided valuable insights and strategies for sedation and off-line management, there are still many problems to be further explored and solved.

Determining the Optimal Dosage of Dexmedetomidine for Smooth Emergence in Older Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Study of 44 Cases.

BACKGROUND Emergence agitation, or delirium, occurs during early recovery from general anesthesia and involves disorientation, excitation, and uncontrolled physical movements. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha agonist that has sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, and sympatholytic activities and is used as a continuous infusion to prevent emergence agitation. This study aimed to evaluate patients aged 65 years and older undergoing general anesthesia to determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of dexmedetomidine continuous intraoperative infusion to prevent emergence agitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 44 patients aged 65 years and older undergoing spinal surgery under general anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine administration commenced 30 minutes before surgery completion, with a predetermined infusion dose (μg/kg/h), without a loading dose. The initial dose was 0.2 μg/kg/h, and subsequent step size was ±0.05 μg/kg/h. We tried to find ED90 of dexmedetomidine using the biased-coin design. Vital signs, extubation quality scores, extubation-related complications, and postoperative outcomes were monitored. RESULTS Dexmedetomidine ED₉₀ for smooth emergence in older patients was 0.34 μg/kg/h. Peri-extubation vital signs remained within 20% of baseline values, without requiring pharmacological intervention. No hypoxia, hypoventilation, or post-extubation agitation occurred. In the recovery room, 1 patient briefly exhibited excitement but quickly calmed. Nine patients initially unresponsive in the recovery room fully awoke and were promptly discharged. CONCLUSIONS For older patients who are vulnerable to adverse effects of anesthetics and opioids, dexmedetomidine enables gentle awakening without adverse vital sign changes, respiratory depression, excessive sedation, or emergence agitation (ED₉₀=0.34 μg/kg/h). Further studies should involve a larger patient cohort, considering diverse medical conditions in older individuals.

Effects of intraoperative low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain after vestibular schwannoma resection: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Esketamine may reduce acute postoperative pain in several settings. However, the effects of low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection with propofol/remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) are unclear. The aim of this study is to observe the effects of intraoperative low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain after vestibular schwannoma resection. This single-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial included 90 adults undergoing VS resection via the retrosigmoid approach with TIVA. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: esketamine or control (n = 45 in each group). Patients received low-dose esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) or a similar volume of normal saline after dural closure. The primary outcome was the pain score during movement (gentle head movement) at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included recovery time, bispectral index (BIS) values and haemodynamic profiles during the first 30 min after esketamine administration, and adverse effects. Low-dose esketamine did not reduce pain scores at rest (P > .05) or with movement (P > .05) within the first 24 h after surgery. Esketamine moderately increased BIS values for at least 30 min after administration (P < .0001) but did not affect heart rate (P = .992) or mean arterial blood pressure (P = .994). Esketamine prolonged extubation time (P = .042, 95% confidence interval: 0.08 to 4.42) and decreased the effect-site concentration of remifentanil at extubation (P = .001, 95% confidence interval: -0.53 to -0.15) but did not affect the time to resumption of spatial orientation. Postoperative nausea and vomiting rates did not differ between groups, and no hallucinations or excessive sedation was observed. Intraoperative low-dose esketamine did not significantly reduce acute pain after VS resection with propofol/remifentanil TIVA. However, BIS values increased for at least 30 min after esketamine administration.

Intraoperative methadone for day-case gynaecological laparoscopy: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Optimal pain relief in day-case surgery is imperative to patient comfort and timely discharge from hospital. Short-acting opioids are commonly used for analgesia in modern anaesthesia, allowing rapid recovery after surgery. Plasma concentration fluctuations from repeated dosing of short-acting opioids can cause patients to oscillate between analgesia with potential adverse effects, and inadequate analgesia requiring rescue dosing. Methadone's unique pharmacology may offer effective and sustained analgesia with less opioid consumption, potentially reducing adverse effects. Using a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we compared post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption between day-case gynaecological laparoscopy patients who received either intravenous methadone (10 mg), or short-acting opioids intraoperatively. The primary outcome was post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, discharge opioid consumption, pain scores (0-10) until discharge, adverse effects (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, excess sedation), and rate of admission. Seventy patients were randomly assigned. Patients who received methadone consumed on average 9.44 mg fewer oral morphine equivalents in the post-anaesthesia care unit than the short-acting group (18.02 mg vs 27.46 mg, respectively, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 18.88, P = 0.050) and experienced lower postoperative pain scores at every time point, although absolute differences were small. There was no evidence of lower hospital or discharge opioid consumption. No significant differences between the methadone and short-acting groups in other outcomes were identified: respiratory depression 41.2% versus 31.4%, Padjusted >0.99; postoperative nausea and vomiting 29.4% versus 42.9%, Padjusted >0.99; overnight admission 17.7% versus 11.4%, Padjusted >0.99; excess sedation 8.82% versus 8.57%, Padjusted >0.99. This study provides evidence that, although modestly, methadone can reduce post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.

A prospective randomized comparative study to evaluate efficacy of intrathecal dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine added as adjuvant to bupivacaine in pregnant patients posted for elective LSCS

Any individual undergoing surgery is concerned about postoperative discomfort. It modifies the body’s physiological reaction and impacts an individual’s psychological state. A physician can meet early mobilization goals by effectively managing postoperative pain and preventing related co-morbidities. Targeting different phases of the pain pathway, from perception to central modulation, is successfully accomplished through the use of different drug combinations and regional anesthetic block techniques. Local anaesthetics injected intrathecally in a single injection create a superb surgical field and can even make a patient pain-free two to three hours following surgery. By adding certain adjuncts, this period can be prolonged, and there will be long-term benefits in terms of decreasing the dosage of opioid analgesics. Because of its faster start of the action and low side effects, spinal anaesthesia is the procedure most frequently used for caesarean sections. Many intrathecal additives have been explored since it has a limited role in postoperative pain control. Adjuvants such as opioids, clonidine, adrenaline, and phenylephrine have been explored recently. These chemicals have been linked to several problems, including tachycardia, respiratory depression with opioids, hypertension with adrenaline and clonidine, and excessive sedation. In this study, our primary objective is to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia between Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, as Dexamethasone is an anti-inflammatory drug and dexmedetomidine is an alpha-two agonist that binds with a G protein-coupled receptor. our secondary objectives include comparing intraoperative hemodynamics, intraoperative sedation, and intraoperative shivering between Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine. CTRI REF.NO-REF/2023/05/067283

Updated sedative basics guide: everything you need to know about sedatives in clinical practice

Background: As interventional procedures become more common in clinical practice, sedatives are being increasingly used to enhance patient experience, overall safety, and procedural efficacy. An appropriate sedation depth, which is crucial for patient safety, is determined according to sedative dosage, procedural stimuli, and patient status. Thus, it is important that clinicians understand the continuous nature of sedation levels.Current Concepts: Although sedation offers benefits, it also carries risks. Thus, vigilant monitoring during and after a procedure is important for preventing excessive sedation depth and related complications. Combining sedatives with analgesics, including opioids, often has a synergistic effect that necessitates a dosage reduction. Interdisciplinary guidelines for moderate sedation were recently developed to address expanding procedural scopes and patient population diversity.Discussion and Conclusion: To ensure sedation safety and success in new procedures, healthcare providers should refer to relevant studies. In cases with limited evidence, sedative dosages should be determined based on their pharmacological characteristics.

Dexmedetomidine as an Emerging Treatment of Agitation in Psychiatric Patients: A Narrative Review

Acute agitation occurs in a variety of medical and psychiatric conditions and is the clinical presentation in a significant percentage of urgent psychiatric episodes, requiring prompt and effective intervention. Traditionally, agitation was managed in psychiatric wards using physical restraint. With the advent of tranquilizing neuroleptics, such as chlorpromazine, the pharmacological management of these conditions became possible. Acute agitation, although a potential result of most psychiatric disorders, is often associated with psychotic conditions, mood disorders and neurodegenerative disorders. The authors propose to explore dexmedetomidine as a therapeutic option in states of acute agitation in psychiatric patients in which traditional drugs are not effective. The authors based the work on a non-systematic review of the literature. Keywords used included: dexmedetomidine, acute agitation, rapid tranquilisation, restraint, sedation, psychiatric population and psychiatric disorders. Recently, a significant step forward in methods of treating acute agitation has been achieved through the use of dexmedetomidine in psychiatric patients. It is a selective α2‐receptor agonist being approved for short‐term sedation with the benefit of not having excessive sedation, thus allowing a concomitant psychotherapeutic approach. This proves to be a promising treatment option for those with acute agitation. The amount of studies available on its usefulness in psychiatric mental illness are still scarce. The interventional recommendations in the literature for agitation were developed based on research data, theoretical considerations and clinical experience, however, studies that provide definitive data are needed. It is imperative that the investigation of episodes of acute agitation and their restraint evolve, in order to protect these patients from the consequences of this behaviour and its treatment. Exploring the potential of dexmedetomidine as a tool in the mental health professional’s kit is well deserved as there are few alternatives that reassure the highly agitated patient without excessive sedation.

“God speaks to me through a dove”. The evidence of clozapine in treatment-refractory psychosis

IntroductionClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic synthesised in 1958. It was withdrawn from the market in the 1970s due to the appearance of agranulocytosis, but was reintroduced due to strong evidence of its efficacy and superiority over other antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.ObjectivesTo describe the adequate response to clozapine in treatment-refractory psychosis.MethodsReview of the scientific literature based on a relevant clinical case.ResultsA 16-year-old woman was admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit for psychotic symptoms and behavioural disorders. She lives with her father and older sister; she has not been in contact with her mother, who lives in another country, for several years. She attends secondary school, with poor academic performance. Maternal diagnosis of schizophrenia. She started using cannabis two years ago, with a progressive increase up to 20 grams per week. He reports the onset of a feeling of strangeness a year ago, with progressive isolation in his room, referring to delirious ideation of harm towards classmates and people from his town, self-referentiality and delirious interpretations of religious mystical content (“God speaks to me through a dove”). He comments on the phenomenon of theft and thought-reading. Soliloquies and unmotivated laughter are observed.ConclusionsTreatment was started with risperidone, progressively increasing the dose up to optimisation, without achieving a decrease in positive symptoms, but with the appearance of excessive sedation and sialorrhoea. It was combined with aripiprazole up to 20mg, maintained for a couple of weeks, without significant clinical improvement. Given the failure of two lines of therapy, it was decided to change to clozapine up to a dose of 75mg, with adequate tolerance and response, achieving a distancing of the delirious ideation. Regular haematological controls were performed, with no alterations in haemogram or troponins.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Postprocedural delirium following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective study

IntroductionNational representative estimates on in-hospital delirium after acute ischemic stroke are not well established and there is limited data on the impact of delirium on clinical outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy. We evaluated risk factors for delirium and the impact on outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke at a single tertiary comprehensive stroke center between April 2011 and December 2019. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory data, elapsed times, tissue plasminogen activator use, duration of the procedure, type of anesthesia, National Institute of Health stroke scores (NIHSS), sedation scores, reperfusion grades, complications, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and 90-day mortality were evaluated.ResultsFive hundred and two patients were evaluated, and post-procedural delirium was identified in 24/467 (5.1%) patients. Thirty-five patients could not be assessed for delirium due to excessive sedation. The incidence of delirium in white vs. non-white patients &amp;lt;65 years was 5/137 (3.6%) compared to 0/91 (0%), and 7/176 (4.0%) compared to 12/63 (19%) in patients ≥65 years, P = 0.006. Bias reduction multi-variable analysis identified low postprocedural hemoglobin level odds ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61–0.92, P = 0.006), greater age (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.009, P = 0.024), and non-white race odds ratio of 2.52 (95% CI 1.06–6.38, P = 0.030) as factors associated with delirium [Brier score = 0.045, C-index = 0.800, and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) = 174]. General anesthesia was not associated with an increased delirium risk. NIHSS at 24 and 48 h and discharge, length of stay, and 90-day mortality were not different between delirium and no-delirium groups. Delirium patients had a reduced odds ratio of 0.13 (05% CI 0.01–1.00, P = 0.02) for home discharge.DiscussionDelirium following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke primarily affected older patients and was associated with reduced odds of home discharge following hospitalization. Changes in NIHSS during hospitalization and 90-day mortality were not adversely affected by the presence of delirium. General anesthesia was not associated with an increased delirium risk following mechanical thrombectomy.

Fixed-Dose Phenobarbital Versus As-Needed Benzodiazepines for the Management of Alcohol Withdrawal in Acute Care General Internal Medicine.

The management of patients at risk of severe alcohol withdrawal is challenging because conventional treatment with as-needed benzodiazepines may be ineffective. We created a fixed-dose phenobarbital protocol and compared patient outcomes using this protocol with an as-needed benzodiazepine protocol. Patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) to General Medicine from January 1 to June 30, 2022 and treated for alcohol withdrawal with a novel phenobarbital protocol were compared with all of the patients admitted from the ED to General Medicine from January 1 to June 30, 2018, and treated with as-needed benzodiazepines. The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer or mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ICU transfer, seizure, length of stay, excess sedation, delirium, against medical advice discharge, 30-day re-admission, 30-day ED reevaluation, and antipsychotic use. There were 54 patients in the phenobarbital group and 197 in the benzodiazepine group. The phenobarbital group was less medically complex but had more risk factors for severe withdrawal. There was no difference in the primary outcome, although there was a trend toward benefit in the phenobarbital group (3.7 vs 8.1%, P = 0.26), and there was a lower incidence of delirium in the phenobarbital cohort (0 vs 8.6%, P = 0.03). Secondary outcome trends favored phenobarbital, with lower mortality, ICU transfer, seizure, oversedation, against medical advice discharge, and 30-day re-admissions. A subgroup analysis accounting for differences in patient populations in the primary analysis found similar results. Phenobarbital is as safe and effective as benzodiazepine-based protocols for the treatment of high-risk alcohol withdrawal, with lower rates of delirium.