Excellent Inter-rater Reliability Research Articles

Retrolabyrinthine Bone Thickness as a Radiologic Marker for the Hypoplastic Endotype in Menière Disease.

Menière disease (MD) manifests in 2 major endotypes: one with a hypoplastic, underdeveloped endolymphatic sac (MD-hp) and the other with a normally developed sac that degenerates over time (MD-dg). Determining the specific endotype in patients is important for predicting disease progression, tailoring patient counseling, and optimizing treatment strategies. Endotype diagnosis involves measuring an angular trajectory of the vestibular aqueduct (ATVA), with an ATVA ≥140° indicative of MD-hp and an ATVA ≤120° of MD-dg. However, assessing the ATVA can be challenging. This study aimed to explore the link between ATVA and the thickness of the retrolabyrinthine bone as an alternative diagnostic measure that could provide differentiation between MD endotypes using CT and MR imaging. Retrospective review of CT temporal bone imaging from 32 adult patients with definite MD (60 ears) and 33 age-matched controls without MD or other inner ear symptoms (61 ears) was performed. The ATVA and retrolabyrinthine bone thickness were measured using uniform methodology on standardized axial CT images. Comparative analyses were performed to determine the correlation between ATVA and retrolabyrinthine bone thickness. Additionally, from a separate cohort of 11 patients (22 ears), CT and MR examinations of the temporal bone were retrospectively reviewed for retrolabyrinthine bone thickness measurements, to verify the correlation across the 2 modalities. The average retrolabyrinthine bone thickness was statistically significantly different between MD endotypes, being a mean of 0.8 (SD, 0.3) mm in patients with MD-hp (ATVA ≥140°) and 2.0 (SD, 0.9) mm in patients with MD-dg (ATVA ≤120°), with a consistent pattern of thin retrolabyrinthine bone in MD-hp and variable thickness in MD-dg. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis within the MD cohort revealed that a retrolabyrinthine bone thickness ≥1.2 mm effectively rules out MD-hp. Excellent interrater reliability was noted for the retrolabyrinthine measurement, and there was near-perfect correlation between CT and MR measurements. Retrolabyrinthine bone thickness proved to be a useful and straightforward alternative marker for distinguishing MD endotypes, being particularly useful for excluding MD-hp. Including information on retrolabyrinthine bone thickness should be considered a routine part of reporting in the context of MD imaging.

An automatic measure for speech intelligibility in dysarthrias—validation across multiple languages and neurological disorders

IntroductionDysarthria, a motor speech disorder caused by muscle weakness or paralysis, severely impacts speech intelligibility and quality of life. The condition is prevalent in motor speech disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), atypical parkinsonism such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Improving intelligibility is not only an outcome that matters to patients but can also play a critical role as an endpoint in clinical research and drug development. This study validates a digital measure for speech intelligibility, the ki: SB-M intelligibility score, across various motor speech disorders and languages following the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe) V3 framework.MethodsThe study used four datasets: healthy controls (HCs) and patients with PD, HD, PSP, and ALS from Czech, Colombian, and German populations. Participants’ speech intelligibility was assessed using the ki: SB-M intelligibility score, which is derived from automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. Verification with inter-ASR reliability and temporal consistency, analytical validation with correlations to gold standard clinical dysarthria scores in each disease, and clinical validation with group comparisons between HCs and patients were performed.ResultsVerification showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability between ASR systems and fair to good consistency. Analytical validation revealed significant correlations between the SB-M intelligibility score and established clinical measures for speech impairments across all patient groups and languages. Clinical validation demonstrated significant differences in intelligibility scores between pathological groups and healthy controls, indicating the measure's discriminative capability.DiscussionThe ki: SB-M intelligibility score is a reliable, valid, and clinically relevant tool for assessing speech intelligibility in motor speech disorders. It holds promise for improving clinical trials through automated, objective, and scalable assessments. Future studies should explore its utility in monitoring disease progression and therapeutic efficacy as well as add data from further dysarthrias to the validation.

Reliability of Ultrasound Assessment of Hamstring Morphology, Quality, and Stiffness Among Healthy Adults and Athletes: A Systematic Review.

The incidence and recurrence rate of hamstring strain injuries remain persistently high, with recurrent injuries leading to increased time lost during play and extended recovery periods compared with initial injury. Ultrasound imaging assesses important factors such as hamstring fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA), cross-sectional area (CSA), muscle thickness (MT), echo intensity (EI), and shear wave elastography (SWE), all impacting athletic performance. However, its reliability must be established before employing any measurement tool in research or clinical settings. To determine the reliability and measurement error of ultrasound for assessing hamstring FL, PA, CSA, MT, EI, and SWE among healthy adults and athletes; to synthesize the information regarding the operationalization of ultrasound. A systematic literature search was done from January 1990 to February 5, 2023, to identify reliability and validity studies of hamstring ultrasound assessment published in peer-reviewed journals with identifiable methodology of outcome measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient measurement of 14 included studies reported moderate to excellent intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliabilities of FL, PA, and MT regardless of the site of muscle testing, probe size, and setting, state of muscle, and use of different techniques in the extrapolation of FL. Good to excellent test-retest reliability rates for all hamstring anatomic CSA along midmuscle and different percentages of thigh length using panoramic imaging. Good intrarater reliability of EI regardless of gender and orientation of the probe but with excellent intrarater reliability in transverse scan using maximum region of interest. Good intrarater, interrater, and interday repeatability on SWE with the muscle in a stretched position. Evidence from studies with a predominantly low risk of bias shows that ultrasound is a reliable tool to measure hamstring FL, PA, CSA, MT, EI, and SWE in healthy adults and athletes under various experimental conditions.

The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study.

The Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) is an informant rating scale designed to measure changes in functional communication in people with aphasia (PWA) from the carer's perspective. It offers a comprehensive view of aphasia's impact on everyday communication situations, aiding clinicians in designing personalized intervention plans. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the CETI into Greek (CETI-GR) and validate its psychometric properties. The CETI-GR was translated into Greek using back-translation. A pilot and a content validity study ensured its acceptability. The study involved 30 people with aphasia and 30 carers. The CETI-GR's psychometric properties were evaluated, including internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and validity measures. The CETI-GR demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.95) and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.93). Excellent consistency was revealed when testing the CETI responses given only by PWA (α = 0.91) versus their carers (α = 0.97). Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.88). Significant correlations between the CETI-GR and measures of language severity, functional communication, and quality of life supported convergent validity. The CETI-GR is a reliable tool for assessing functional communication in chronic aphasia. Its Greek adaptation enhances aphasia rehabilitation, enabling person-centered care and improving the quality of life for people with aphasia and carers.

Deltoid Tuberosity Index for Proximal Humerus Fracture: Reliability and A Predictor of Systemic Osteoporosis in an Asian Population

Our study investigates the reliability of deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) and DTI as a predictor of systemic osteoporosis. The proximal humerus is a common fragility fracture. Current literature suggests that poor local bone density is a significant predictor for surgical fixation failure. The DTI is a simple radiographical tool that is strongly correlates with local humeral BMD aiding surgical planning to consider adjuncts or arthroplasty. However, there is a lack of data in the reliability of assessment of DTI, as well as its correlation to systemic osteoporosis. Respective cohort of patients with PHF treated at a trauma center in Singapore from August 2017 to July 2018 were recruited. Four raters at different levels of varying clinical seniority measured DTI using shoulder radiographs. The dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) bone mineral density (BMD) scan of the hip and lumbar spine was used to diagnose osteoporosis. Area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) analysis was conducted to study the diagnostic utility of DTI to predict the risk of osteoporosis. Our study had 87 patients consisting 18 males and 69 females, mainly of Chinese ethnicity (84%) and mean age of 69.7 years (SD 9.52, range 39-92yrs). For assessment of DTI, there was good intra-rater reliability amongst four raters (correlation coefficient range 0.805- 0.843) and excellent inter-rater reliability between al raters (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.898; 95% CI 0.784-0.950, p-value <0.001). Based on BMD, 55.2% (n=48) were osteoporotic using T-score <-2.5. The highest correlation of DTI to BMD was with femoral neck density at 0.580. The DTI cut-off of 1.6 had the highest combined sensitivity and false positive rate, with area under curve (AUC) = 0.682 (95% CI, 0.564-0.799) for the overall population and AUC =0.706 (95% CI, 0.569-0.842) for patients <75 years. The DTI is a simple and reliable tool, strengthening its applicability in clinical practice to enhance preoperative planning in the surgical fixation of PHF. DTI with a cut off of 1.6 may be helpful tool prompting clinicians to workup and manage underlying osteoporosis.

Investigation of the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Comprehensive Coordination Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease

ObjectiveThe Comprehensive Coordination Scale (CCS) is a valid, reliable scale for evaluating motor coordination, described as the ability to produce context-dependent movements of multiple body parts in both spatial and temporal domains in patients with chronic stroke. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the CCS that can be used to evaluate coordination in Parkinson's disease patients and to test its validity and reliability. MethodsThirty-four patients with Parkinson’s disease (18 females, 16 males) with a mean age of 67.55± 10.93 years were included. The 9-Hole Peg Test (9 HPT), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) were administered to the patients. ResultsIn the correlation analysis for convergent validity, the CCS-TR showed a moderate negative correlation with both the 9 HPT and the TUG test (r=-0.684 and −0.641, respectively). There were also moderate positive correlations observed between the CCS-TR and the FRT and BBS (r=0.607 and 0.657, respectively). The total CCS-TR had excellent intrarater reliability (ICC=0.99; 95 % CI: 0.98–0.99) and interrater reliability (ICC=0.90; 95 % CI: 0.81–0.95). The CCS-TR subscales had excellent intrarater reliability (ICC: range 0.98 from 0.99). For intrarater agreement, the ICC was 0.99, and for interrater agreement, the ICC was 0.90 (excellent agreement). ConclusionThe results of the present study indicate that the Turkish version of the CCS is a reliable and valid coordination scale that can be used in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

The Bead Maze Hand Function Test for Children.

There is a need for a pediatric hand function test that can be used to objectively assess movement quality. We have developed a toy-based test, the Bead Maze Hand Function (BMHF) test, to quantify how well a child performs an activity. This is achieved by assessing the control of forces applied while drawing a bead over wires of different complexity. To study the psychometric properties of the BMHF test and understand the influence of age and task complexity on test measures. A cross-sectional, observational study performed in a single visit. Clinical research laboratory. Twenty-three participants (ages 4-15 yr) were recruited locally. They were typically developing children with no illness or conditions that affected their movement. Interventions/Assessments: Participants performed the BMHF test and the Box and Block test with both hands. Total force and completion time were examined according to age and task complexity using a linear mixed-effects model. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients to measure interrater reliability of the method and estimated concurrent validity using the Box and Block test. Total force and completion time decreased with age and depended on task complexity. The total force was more sensitive to task complexity. The Box and Block score was associated with BMHF completion time but not with total force. We found excellent interrater reliability. A familiar toy equipped with hidden sensors provides a sensitive tool to assess a child's typical hand function. Plain-Language Summary: We developed the Bead Maze Hand Function (BMHF) test to determine how well a child performs an activity with their hands. The BMHF test is a toy equipped with hidden sensors. Twenty-three typically developing children with no illnesses or conditions that affected their hand movement participated in the study. We asked the children to perform the BMHF test with both hands. Our study found that occupational therapists can reliably use the BMHF test to assess a child's hand function.

Identifying vulnerable mother-infant dyads: a psychometric evaluation of two observational coding systems using varying interaction periods.

Clinical services require feasible assessments of parent-infant interaction in order to identify dyads requiring parenting intervention. We assessed the reliability and predictive validity of two observational tools and tested whether briefer forms could be identified which retain acceptable psychometric properties over short observation periods. A stratified high-risk community sample of 250 mother-infant dyads from The Wirral Child Health and Development Study completed 7-min play-based interaction at 6-8 months. Film-footage was independently coded by two trained raters using PIIOS and NICHD-SECCYD systems. Incremental predictive validity was assessed from 3, 5 and 7 min observation to attachment outcomes (Strange Situation; 14 months) and infant mental health (BITSEA; 14 and 30 months). Excellent inter-rater reliability was evident at code and subscale level for each tool and observation period. Stability of within-rater agreement was optimal after 5 min observation. ROC analysis confirmed predictive (discriminant) validity (AUCs >0.70) to top decile age 2 mental health outcomes for PIIOS total score and a brief 3-item composite from NICHD-SECCYD (sensitivity, intrusiveness, positive regard; NICHD-3), but not to attachment outcomes. Logistic regression showed dyads rated at-risk for externalizing problems using NICHD-3 were also at significantly higher risk for insecurity at 14 months (OR = 2.7, p = 0.004). PIIOS total and NICHD-3 ratings from 5 min observation are both reliable and valid tools for use in clinical practice. Findings suggest NICHD-3 may have greater utility due to its comparative brevity to train and code, with suitability for use over a broader developmental time frame (3-24 months).

Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability of the foot posture index (FPI-6) for assessing static foot posture in elderly female patients with knee osteoarthritis and its association with quadriceps muscle tone and stiffness.

1. To assess the Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability of FPI-6 total score and individual scores in static foot posture evaluation among elderly female patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), aiming to establish the reliability of the FPI-6 scale. 2. To investigate the disparity between dominant and non-dominant quadriceps characteristics in elderly female KOA patients, as well as explore the correlation between quadriceps characteristics and abnormal foot posture, thereby offering novel insights for the prevention and treatment of KOA. The study enrolled a total of 80 lower legs of 40 participants (all female) with unilateral or bilateral KOA, who were assessed by two raters at three different time points. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the FPI-6 was evaluated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), while the absolute reliability of FPI-6 was examined using the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The internal consistency of FPI-6 was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Additionally, MyotonPRO was employed to assess quadriceps muscle tone and stiffness in all participants, and the association between quadriceps muscle tone/stiffness and the total score of FPI-6 was analyzed. Our study found excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability (ICC values of 0.923 and 0.931, respectively) for the FPI-6 total score, as well as good to excellent reliability (ICC values ranging from 0.680 to 0.863 and 0.739-0.883) for individual items. The SEM and MDC values for the total score of FPI-6 among our study inter-rater were 0.78 and 2.15, respectively. and the SEM and MDC values for the test-retest total score of FPI-6 were found to be 0.76 and 2.11, respectively. Furthermore, the SEM and MDC values between inter-rater and test-retest across six individual items ranged from 0.30 to 0.56 and from 0.84 to 1.56. The Bland-Altman plots and respective 95% LOA showed no evidence of systematic bias. In terms of the mechanical properties of the quadriceps on both sides, the muscle tone and stiffness of rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis (VL) were significantly higher in the non-dominant leg compared to the dominant leg. Additionally, in the non-dominant leg, there was a significant positive correlation between the muscle tone and stiffness of VM, VL, RF and the total score of FPI-6. However, in the dominant leg, only VM's muscle tone and stiffness showed a significant positive correlation with the total score of FPI-6. The reliability of the FPI-6 total score and its six individual items was good to excellent. Our findings offer a straightforward and dependable approach for researchers to assess foot posture in elderly female patients with KOA. Furthermore, we observed significantly greater quadriceps tension and stiffness in the non-dominant leg compared to the dominant leg. The FPI-6 total score exhibited a significant correlation with changes in quadriceps muscle performance among KOA patients. These observations regarding the relationship between changes in quadriceps muscle performance and foot posture in elderly female KOA patients may provide novel insights for disease prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation.

MEDIC: Development and validation of a new instrument to assess emotional reactivity to medical stimuli in a representative community sample of adults

To support investigation of the etiology and psychophysiology of medical traumatic stress, we developed a standardized set of emotionally-salient medical images, called the ‘MEDical Image Collection’ (MEDIC), for use in neuroimaging or psychological research. This study aimed to establish internal consistency, test re-test reliability, and congruent validity of the image set. A representative sample of 300 adults in the United States were recruited via research recruitment platform, Prolific. Participants rated 124 images depicting medical stimuli on one of two dimensions: emotional arousal (i.e., how strongly an evoked emotion is felt) or affective valence (i.e., how positive or negative the evoked emotion is). Sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, including experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, were also assessed. To assess test re-test reliability, a subset (n = 200) rated the images on the same dimension a second time, 3 months later. The MEDIC image set was found to: (a) elicit a range of emotional arousal and valence ratings, (b) have excellent inter-rater reliability, (c) moderate test-retest reliability, and (d) good face validity. Results indicate the new MEDIC 124-image set is a reliable and valid instrument, enabling researchers to provide context-specific and emotionally-salient stimuli to individuals when studying affective responses in relation to health and medicine.

The Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index: An Outcome Instrument for Typical Nail Lichen Planus.

Despite numerous treatment options for nail lichen planus (NLP), a validated method for measuring the severity of NLP and therapeutic response in clinical trials is absent. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a measurement instrument, Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index (tNLPSI), for typical NLP that could be used in clinical trials. A total of 48 patients pathologically confirmed with typical NLP were enrolled in this study. Five dermatologists were trained to use the tNLPSI activity scale and the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale to score samples independently to estimate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across two sessions. In addition, tNLPSI activity scores were compared with PGA scores to assess the construct validity. The tNLPSI activity scale had excellent internal consistency and inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.990; ICC = 0.954; 95% CI = 0.930-0.971), and the correlations between the different graders' scores indicate good consistency (rp = 0.934-0.968). In addition, the tNLPSI activity scale demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.993-0.998), showing good reproducibility. And tNLPSI activity scores and PGA scores showed good construct validity (Spearman's rho = 0.941 and Spearman's rho = 0.903-0.935, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). The tNLPSI activity scale was demonstrated to be consistent, reliable, reproducible, and feasible, making it a potential valuable tool for evaluating the treatment response in typical NLP clinical trials.

Psychometric Properties of the Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women in a Symptom-Reporting Sample.

While structured clinical interviews are considered the gold standard for diagnosing mental disorders, respective instruments are still lacking in the field of sexual dysfunctions. The study evaluates the psychometric properties of the new Diagnostic Interview for Sexual Dysfunctions in Women (DISEX-F), which is based on the eleventh edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), in a sample of 100 women with self-reported sexual problems. Participants were interviewed twice by trained diagnosticians with the DISEX-F. A third diagnostician evaluated the audio records of the initial interview. Participants also completed self-report measures of sexual functioning/distress and interview acceptance. The DISEX-F demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability, good test-retest reliability, and strong convergent and discriminant evidence of validity. Furthermore, it achieves high acceptance among participants. Discordant diagnostic outcomes were especially linked to false differential diagnostic decisions and information variance in participants reporting. The results strongly support using the DISEX-F for women presenting with self-reported sexual problems in practice and research.

Reliability of Hip Strength Assessment in Young Active People with Hip Dysplasia: An Examination in Student Circus Artists.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is common in performing artists and other young active individuals and involves abnormalities in bony morphology of the acetabulum and proximal femur that can negatively impact walking biomechanics, muscular strength, quality of life, and sleep. Rehabilitation for hip-related conditions should target known modifiable impairments such as hip muscle strength, though a reliable method of assessment in this population remains unclear. To determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of hip muscle strength assessments using handheld dynamometry (HHD) in young active circus artists with DDH. Reliability of hip strength in all planes was assessed using HHD in 21 adult performing circus arts students (mean age 21.3 yrs [3.2]; 13 M, 5 F, 3 NB) with symptomatic radiologically and clinically diagnosed hip dysplasia. The reliability of average peak force and absolute peak force were expressed for each position tested. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values calculated to improve clinical interpretability. Good to excellent inter-rater reliability resulted for all hip muscle strength testing positions, ICC=0.88 (95%CI 0.70 to 0.95) to ICC=0.97 (0.92 to 0.99), except average peak hip flexion strength, ICC=0.71 (0.28 to 0.88). Absolute peak hip abduction, ICC=0.77 (0.16 to 0.94), and adduction strength, ICC=0.72 (-0.55 to 0.92), demonstrated the lowest intra-rater reliability. Transverse plane strength measures (rotation) produced the lowest SEM and MDC values followed by the frontal plane (abduction/adduction) and sagittal plane (flexion/extension). HHD is an appropriate and reliable method to assess hip muscle strength in circus artists with DDH.

Relative Cortical Atrophy Index as a Strong Predictor of Recurrence After Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) presents significant management challenges in neurosurgical practice, with recurrence being a notable postoperative consideration. This study aimed to evaluate the Relative Cortical Atrophy (RCA) Index as a predictor of recurrence after CSDH surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 98 patients who underwent surgical evacuation for unilateral CSDH. The RCA Index was calculated using pre- and postoperative cranial imaging, correlating it with patient demographics, hematoma characteristics, and recurrence. Inter-rater reliability among measurements by 4 independent physicians was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlation and regression analyses were performed to identify the correlation of the RCA Index with other factors and their potential predicting power of CSDH recurrence, respectively. The study population had a mean age of 74.1 (11.9) years, with a 23.5% (23 patients) recurrence rate of CSDH. The ICC analysis showed excellent inter-rater reliability for RCA Index measurements (ICC: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.998, P < .001). A higher preoperative RCA Index was significantly associated with recurrence (0.215 [0.031] in the recurrent group vs 0.125 [0.034] in the nonrecurrent group, P < .001). The preoperative RCA Index highly correlated with the postoperative RCA Index (Pearson's correlation: 0.918, P < .001), and there was only a small (average: 0.005) but significant increase in the RCA Index of the unaffected hemisphere after surgery (P = .01).The preoperative RCA Index positively correlated with age, preoperative SDH thickness and volume, and recurrence. A RCA Index cutoff value of 0.165 predicted CSDH recurrence with high sensitivity (95.6%) and specificity (93.3%) (area under the curve = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-1). The RCA Index is a simple yet robust predictor of CSDH recurrence. Incorporating this measure into the preoperative assessment may enhance surgical planning and postoperative management, potentially reducing recurrence rates.

Imaging findings and MRI patterns in a cohort of 18q chromosomal abnormalities.

The abnormalities of long arm of chromosome 18 (18q) constitute a complex spectrum. We aimed to systematically analyze their MRI features. We hypothesized that there would be variable but recognizable white matter and structural patterns in this cohort. In this retrospective cohort study, we included pediatric patients with a proven abnormality of 18q between 2000-2022. An age and sex matched control cohort was also constructed. Thirty-six cases, median MRI age 19.6 months (4.3 - 59.3), satisfied our inclusion criteria. Majority were females (25, 69%, F:M ratio 2.2:1). Fifty MR imaging studies were analyzed and 35 (70%) had delayed myelination. Two independent readers scored brain myelination with excellent interrater reliability. Three recognizable evolving MRI patterns with distinct age distributions and improving myelination scores were identified - PMD-like (9.9 months, 37), intermediate (22 months, 48) and washed-out pattern (113.6 months, 53). Etiologically, MRIs were analyzed across three subgroups - 18q- (34, 69%), trisomy 18 (10, 21%) and ring chromosome 18 (5, 10%). Ring chromosome 18 had the highest myelination lag (27, P value = 0.005) and multifocal white matter changes (P value = 0.001). Trisomy 18 had smaller pons and cerebellar dimensions (APD pons P value = 0.002, CC vermis P value <0.001 and TCD P value = 0.04). In this cohort of 18q chromosomal abnormalities, MRI revealed recognizable patterns correlating with improving brain myelination. Imaging findings appear to be on a continuum with more severe white matter abnormalities in ring chromosome 18 and greater prevalence of structural abnormalities of pons and cerebellum in trisomy 18. 18q-: 18q deletion; CC: corpus callosum; CC-APD: CC anteroposterior diameter; FOD: fronto-occipital diameter; TCD: transverse cerebellar diameter; APD: anteroposterior diameter; CCD: craniocaudal diameter; MBP: myelin basic protein; PMD: Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease; GWMD: gray-white matter differentiation.

Test of mastication and swallowing solids in healthy individuals aged 6 to 20 years: A normative study in an Indian context.

The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS) is a reliable tool for assessing chewing and swallowing in healthy adults, using commercially available crackers. TOMASS-Children (TOMASS-C) is the paediatric version of TOMASS. The present study aimed to establish normative data for TOMASS-C using a validated regional commercial cracker among healthy individuals aged between 6-20 years of India. 327 healthy individuals between 6-20 years were recruited in a cross-sectional study design following a convenient sampling procedure. Participants consumed one validated regional cracker and the procedure was video recorded. Data were stratified according to age groups (6-7, 8-9, 10-13, 14-17 and 18-20 years) and sex (boys and girls). Two Speech Language Pathologists independently analysed the video recordings to derive discrete bites, masticatory cycles, swallows and total swallow time indices. Using them, time/swallow, masticatory cycles/bite, swallows/bite and time/bite were calculated. All parameters of TOMASS-C had moderate to good (0.6-0.85) test-retest reliability and moderate to excellent (0.69-0.99) inter-rater reliability at p > .000. Younger participants took more bites, chewed more times and swallowed more frequently with longer chewing and swallowing time. Boys exhibited a lower number of swallows, shorter swallow time and reduced total masticatory time at p > .05. Additionally, girls demonstrated fewer bites and chewing cycles compared to boys at p > .05. TOMASS-C using a validated regional cracker was feasible and reliable. Normative data established for healthy boys and girls between 6-20 years offers much-needed quantitative data to objectively delineate individuals with and without chewing and swallowing solid food difficulties.

Fundamental Stability Skills: Reliability Analysis Using the Alfamov Assessment Tool.

Fundamental movement skills (FMS), considered as building blocks of movement, have received growing interest due to their significant impact on both present and future health. FMS are categorized into locomotor, object control and stability skills. While there has been extensive research on assessing the proficiency and reliability of locomotor and object control skills, stability skills have received comparatively less attention. For this reason, this study aimed to assess the test-retest, intrarater and interrater reliability of five stability skills included in the Alfamov app. The performance of eighty-four healthy primary school children (60.8% girls), aged 6 to 12 years (mean ± standard deviation of 8.7 ± 1.8 years), in five stability skills was evaluated and scored by four raters, including two experts and two novices. The Alfamov tool, integrating various process-oriented tests, was used for the assessment. Reliability analyses were conducted through the computation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Good-to-excellent intrarater reliability, excellent interrater reliability and moderate-to-good reliability in the test-retest were achieved. The results proved that Alfamov is a robust test for evaluating stability skills and can be suitable for use by different professionals with less experience in assessing children's motor competence.

A Tool for the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency in Adults: Turkish Adaptation of Boston Residue and Clearance Scale.

The objective of this study was to create a Turkish language adaptation of the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), a validated and reliable tool. The BRACS scale was first translated into Turkish and a Turkish version was subsequently developed. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) was administered to collect data from 25 dysphagic patients who were hospitalized after a stroke. The recorded films were subjected to editing procedures to ensure their appropriateness for the assessment of swallowing disorders and were then dispatched to a panel of five speech and language therapists for evaluation using the adaptation of the BRACS instrument. The scoring by the experts was evaluated using both explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity, item reliability, and construct (composite) reliability were measured by calculating the average variance extracted (AVE) values. For the 12 location items, EFA revealed 3 main latent factors: the laryngeal vestibule and the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The Turkish BRACS had excellent inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff's alpha coefficient values ranged from 0.93 to 0.95) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.88 to 0.93). Inter-rater ICCs for the first and second sessions were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. CFA showed that all fitted criteria reached acceptable or perfect fit levels. The findings indicated that the proposed factor structure was validated. The AVE values are between 0.61 and 0.73 which was taken as evidence of convergent validity. The Turkish adaptation of the BRACS tool demonstrates both reliablity and validity, rendering it a useful and credible tool for assessing residual severity, particularly in clinical settings.

Validity of the DSM-5 Mixed Features Specifier Interview.

To examine the reliability and validity of a semi-structured interview assessing the features of the DSM-5 mixed features specifier. Our goal was to develop an instrument that could be used for both diagnostic and severity measurement purposes. Four hundred fifty-nine psychiatric patients in a depressive episode were interviewed by a trained diagnostic rater who administered semi-structured interviews including the DSM-5 Mixed Features Specifier Interview (DMSI). We examined the inter-rater reliability and psychometric properties of the DMSI. The patients were rated on clinician rating scales of depression, anxiety, and irritability, and measures of psychosocial functioning, suicidality, and family history of bipolar disorder. The DMSI had excellent joint-interview interrater reliability. More than twice as many patients met the DSM-5 mixed features specifier criteria during the week before the assessment than for the majority of the episode (9.4% vs. 3.9%). DMSI total scores were more highly correlated with a clinician-rated measure of manic symptoms than with measures of depression and anxiety. More patients with bipolar depression met the mixed features specifier than patients with MDD. Amongst patients with MDD, those with mixed features more frequently had a family history of bipolar disorder, were more frequently diagnosed with anxiety disorders, attention deficit disorder, and borderline personality disorder, more frequently had attempted suicide, and were more severely depressed, anxious, and irritable. The DMSI is a reliable and valid measure of the presence of the DSM-5 mixed features specifier in depressed patients as well as the severity of the features of the specifier.

Pressure pain mapping of equine distal joints: feasibility and reliability.

Osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease initiating chronic pain and lameness in horses. While several objective gait analysis systems have been developed and validated to quantify lameness severity in horses, methods to evaluate whether peripheral sensitization contributes to the pain experienced are missing. To evaluate whether periarticular pressure pain mapping could be proposed as an auxiliary assessment tool in horses. Specific aims were to evaluate the feasibility and intra- and inter-rater reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) determination at sites overlying the distal thoracic limb joints of clinically healthy horses. Prospective, randomized validation study. For feasibility assessment, PPT were measured with a hand-held digital algometer at six periarticular landmarks (2 sites per joint, 3 joints) bilaterally on the distal thoracic limb of 40 healthy horses (20 warmblood and 20 Freiberger). The joints tested were the metacarpophalangeal, on the latero-palmar and dorsal aspects (L-MCP and D-MCP), the proximal interphalangeal, on the dorsal and palmar aspect (D-PIP and P-PIP) and the distal interphalangeal, on the dorsal and lateral aspect (D-DIP and L-DIP). A feasibility score, ranging from 0 to 5, was attributed to each testing session. For intra- and inter-rater reliability assessment, L-MCP and D-MCP were selected to be tested again at 2 weeks intervals in 20 out of the 40 horses. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear model to test differences in threshold per site and limb. Intra- and inter-rater correlation was calculated. Bland-Altman plots were performed to evaluate the variability of the measures. The procedure was considered feasible (score <2) in 95% of horses (95% CI 88%-100%). Overall, median [interquartile range (IQR)] PPT was 9.4 (7.5-11.3) N. No significant side differences were found. P-PIP and D-DIP recorded significantly lower PPT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) than L-MCP. Median (IQR) were 9.9 (7.3-12.4) N, 8.4 (6.1-10.5) N and 9.0 (7.4-10.6) N for L-MCP, P-PIP and D-DIP, respectively. The intra-rater agreement was 0.68 (95% CI 0.35-0.86) for L-MCP, and 0.50 (95% CI 0.08-0.76) for D-MCP. Inter-rater agreement was 0.85 (95% CI 0.66-0.94) for L-MCP and 0.81 (0.57, 0.92) for D-MCP. Evaluation of feasibility was performed only for distal thoracic limbs joints; no data are provided for hind limbs or proximal joints. Only warmblood and Freiberger horses were included. Intra- and inter-rater reliability assessments were performed exclusively on data collected at the MCP joint. Pressure pain mapping of distal thoracic limb joints was feasible in horses. Local sensitivity differed among sites and no side differences were noticed. Data collected from the MCP joint suggest highly variable, subject dependent intra-rater reliability, ranging from poor to good, and good to excellent inter-rater reliability. Further studies evaluating pathologic vs. healthy joints are needed before recommendations can be made about clinical usability and diagnostic validity.