Examination Of Small Bowel Research Articles

Double balloon enteroscopy versus single balloon enteroscopy: A comparative study.

Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) like the double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are postulated to ease small bowel examination and performance of therapy. However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 modalities have yielded varying results. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of SBE and DBE. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent DBE (n = 82) or SBE (n = 45) for small bowel exam in our unit from January 2014 to January 2022. Our primary outcomes were to compare the technical success and diagnostic success rates between DBE and SBE. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the therapeutic success, and complication rates. The main indications were suspected GI bleeding (DBE 41.5% vs SBE 48.9%), iron deficiency anemia (DBE 9.8% vs SBE 4.4%) and small bowel lesions (DBE 28.0% vs SBE 44.4%) detected either from prior capsule endoscopy or radiological imaging. Majority of the enteroscopy exam was by antegrade approach (DBE 67.1% vs SBE 77.8%). We found no significant difference in the technical success (DBE 95.1% vs SBE 97.8%, P = .46), diagnostic success (DBE 69.5% vs SBE 77.8%, P = .36) and the therapeutic success rate (DBE 63.2% vs SBE 54.3%, P = .09) between the groups. Complications occurred in 1 case from each group (mucosal tear). None of the complications were major. In patients who underwent enteroscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of SBE is similar to DBE. Both procedures were safe with low complication rates.

Efficacy and safety of three-dimensional magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal and small bowel examination.

Magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) showed the feasibility for upper gastrointestinal examination. To further enhance the performance of conventional MACE, it is necessary to provide quality-improved and three-dimensional images. The aim of this clinical study was to determine the efficacy and safety of novel three-dimensional MACE (3D MACE) for upper gastrointestinal and small bowel examination at once. This was a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, and sequential examination study (KCT0007114) at Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital. Adult patients who visited for upper endoscopy were included. The study protocol was conducted in two stages. First, upper gastrointestinal examination was performed using 3D MACE, and a continuous small bowel examination was performed by conventional method of capsule endoscopy. Two hours later, an upper endoscopy was performed for comparison with 3D MACE examination. The primary outcome was confirmation of major gastric structures (esophagogastric junction, cardia/fundus, body, angle, antrum, and pylorus). Secondary outcomes were confirmation of esophagus and duodenal bulb, accuracy for gastric lesions, completion of small bowel examination, 3D image reconstruction of gastric lesion, and safety. Fifty-five patients were finally enrolled. The examination time of 3D MACE was 14.84 ± 3.02 minutes and upper endoscopy was 5.22 ± 2.39 minutes. The confirmation rate of the six major gastric structures was 98.6% in 3D MACE and 100% in upper endoscopy. Gastric lesions were identified in 43 patients during 3D MACE, and 40 patients during upper endoscopy (Sensitivity 0.97). 3D reconstructed images were acquired for all lesions inspected by 3D MACE. The continuous small bowel examination by 3D MACE was completed in 94.5%. 3D MACE showed better overall satisfaction (3D MACE 9.55 ± 0.79 and upper endoscopy 7.75 ± 2.34, p<0.0001). There were no aspiration or significant adverse event or capsule retention in the 3D MACE examination. Novel 3D MACE system is more advanced diagnostic modality than the conventional MACE. And it is possible to perform serial upper gastrointestinal and small bowel examination as a non-invasive and one-step test. It would be also served as a bridge to pan-endoscopy.

Reading of small bowel capsule endoscopy after frame reduction using an artificial intelligence algorithm

ObjectivesPoorly visualized images that appear during small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) can confuse the interpretation of small bowel lesions and increase the physician’s workload. Using a validated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that can evaluate the mucosal visualization, we aimed to assess whether SBCE reading after the removal of poorly visualized images could affect the diagnosis of SBCE.MethodsA study was conducted to analyze 90 SBCE cases in which a small bowel examination was completed. Two experienced endoscopists alternately performed two types of readings. They used the AI algorithm to remove poorly visualized images for the frame reduction reading (AI user group) and conducted whole frame reading without AI (AI non-user group) for the same patient. A poorly visualized image was defined as an image with < 50% mucosal visualization. The study outcomes were diagnostic concordance and reading time between the two groups. The SBCE diagnosis was classified as Crohn’s disease, bleeding, polyp, angiodysplasia, and nonspecific finding.ResultsThe final SBCE diagnoses between the two groups showed statistically significant diagnostic concordance (k = 0.954, p < 0.001). The mean number of lesion images was 3008.5 ± 9964.9 in the AI non-user group and 1401.7 ± 4811.3 in the AI user group. There were no cases in which lesions were completely removed. Compared with the AI non-user group (120.9 min), the reading time was reduced by 35.6% in the AI user group (77.9 min).ConclusionsSBCE reading after reducing poorly visualized frames using the AI algorithm did not have a negative effect on the final diagnosis. SBCE reading method integrated with frame reduction and mucosal visualization evaluation will help improve AI-assisted SBCE interpretation.

Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Videocapsule Endoscopy in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia. A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or malabsorption represents the most frequent aetiologies of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The cause of IDA remains undetermined in ~10% to 20% of patients undergoing upper and lower GI endoscopies. In this scenario, a small bowel examination with videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) is recommended. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic yield of VCE in patients with IDA without overt bleeding, assessing the prevalence of either any lesion or lesions at high potential of bleeding. A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published until March 2023. Twelve studies with a total of 1703 IDA patients (Males: 47%; age range: 19-92y) were included in this systematic review. The diagnostic yield of VCE for overall lesions in the small bowel was 61% (95% CI=44-77; 95 CI=97.2-98.1; I2=97.7%). When analyzing only small bowel lesions likely responsible of IDA, the diagnostic yield was 40% (95% CI=27-53; 95% CI=95.3-97; I2=96.3%). VCE plays a relevant role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with IDA without overt bleeding with a satisfactory diagnostic yield.

Effectiveness and safety of novel motorized spiral enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is a novel advance in small bowel examination that is characterized as fast with a deep insertion. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of MSE. Relevant articles that were published before November 1, 2022 were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. The technical success rate (TSR), total (pan)-enteroscopy rate (TER), depth of maximum insertion (DMI), diagnostic yield, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. Forest plots were graphed based on random effects models. A total of 876 patients from 8 studies were eligible for analysis. The pooled results of the TSR were 95.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 91.0-98.0%, I2 = 78%, p < 0.01] and the pooled outcome of the TER was 43.1% (95% CI 24.7-62.5%, I2 = 95%, p < 0.01). The pooled results of the diagnostic and therapeutic yields were 77.2% (95% CI 69.0-84.5%, I2 = 84%, p < 0.01) and 49.0% (95% CI 38.0-60.1%, I2 = 89%, p < 0.01), respectively. The pooled estimates of adverse and severe adverse events were 17.2% (95% CI 11.9-23.2%, I2 = 75%, p < 0.01) and 0.7% (95% CI 0.0-2.1%, I2 = 37%, p = 0.13), respectively. MSE is a novel alternative approach for small bowel examination that can achieve high TER and diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and relatively low rates of severe adverse events. Head-to-head studies comparing MSE and other device-assisted enteroscopies are warranted.

Contrast enema, CT, and small bowel series of the ileal pouch.

This manuscript is part of the ileal pouch symposium and will describe the water-soluble contrast enema, CT, and small bowel series. MRI and other imaging modalities are discussed elsewhere in the symposium. Water-soluble contrast enema and CT are excellent for the evaluation of the ileal pouch. Contrast enema and CT with anal contrast administration can allow for anastomotic integrity and pouch assessment. Pre-pouch ileum, extra-intestinal manifestations, and acute symptomatology are best assessed with CT. The contrast small bowel examination is of limited utility in pouch patients and should not be performed. Indications, imaging technique, and anatomic pouch assessment with water-soluble contrast enema, CT, and contrast small bowel examination will be reviewed here.

Imaging congenital anomalies of the ileum in adults:a pictorial review.

The ileal loops are anatomical location for the majority of congenital anomalies affecting the gastrointestinal tract. These include Meckel's diverticulum, ileal duplication, dysgenesis, atresia, mucosal diaphragm, and malposition of the ileum. Symptomatic lesions that often present with abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction or bleeding are usually diagnosed and treated during infancy and childhood. However, many of these congenital conditions may remain clinically silent and detected incidentally in adults undergoing radiological evaluation for unrelated medical reasons. This article presents the spectrum of the congenital ileal anomalies and their distinct features on small bowel examination and CT of the abdomen.

S1571 Device-Assisted Enteroscopy (DAE) in the Surveillance of Intestinal Polyposis in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome

Introduction: Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant, genetic disorder characterized by the formation of hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. These polyps are a source of significant morbidity and mortality in this population due to associated complications of intestinal obstruction, bleeding, and malignant transformation. Surveillance of intestinal polyposis in patients with PJS has not been extensively studied, although centers which perform a significant volume of device-assisted enteroscopies (DAEs) encounter multiple cases each year. With the progressive adoption of DAE, examination of the deep small bowel for monitoring and prophylactic polypectomy has the potential to prevent complications of PJS and minimize the need for repeated laparotomy. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, electronic health records were used to identify all DAEs performed on patients with PJS at 3 US referral centers (LSU, Duke, and UMass) between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect and analyze multiple data points. Primary endpoints included the complications associated with DAE performed for removal of intestinal hamartomas and the rate of laparotomy in PJS patients prior to and after index DAE. Secondary data points included patient characteristics, procedural details, and size/location/distribution of small bowel hamartomas. Results: Twenty-four patients met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 (75%) had previously undergone small bowel surgery for complications related to small bowel hamartomas. Between 2007 - 2020, a total of 46 DAEs were performed in these patients with an average of one surveillance exam every 2.5 years. A total of 131 polypectomies were performed during our study period with an observed complication rate of 1.5%, including one bowel perforation requiring surgery. Only one patient underwent surgery related to small bowel hamartomas following initial DAE surveillance exam over a total of 366 years of aggregated follow-up (Figure). Conclusion: Endoscopic management of small bowel polyps in patients with PJS using DAE is an effective strategy for prophylactic removal of hamartomas. DAE surveillance and endoscopic polypectomy is safe and may decrease the need for repeated laparotomy due to complications from intestinal hamartomas in patients with PJS.Figure 1.: Hamartomatous polyp in the ileum removed with saline injection-lift technique and hot snare polypectomy

S1563 ACE Inhibitor Use Is Associated With Angioectasias on Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia

Introduction: Small bowel bleeding poses a clinical challenge in patients with vascular lesions. Bleeding recurrence after endoscopic therapy is high and medical therapies have limited efficacy. In those with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) has been associated with a reduced rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. Conversely, the antiplatelet effects of ACEi have been described thought due to their effects in decreasing platelet aggregation. Our aim was to determine whether ACEi or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy had an impact on the rate of positive VCE small bowel findings in those with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Methods: Data was collected from consecutive inpatient and outpatient VCE examinations performed between January 1, 2009 to March 1, 2018 at a single U.S. tertiary medical center performed for IDA. VCE studies were excluded in those with incomplete small bowel examinations (9) or technical failure (1). Patient demographics, laboratory values, medication use and endoscopic findings were recorded. VCE findings were based on the P0-P2 grading system. The primary outcome of interest was a positive (P2) VCE. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fischer’s exact test for dichotomous variables. Bivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors predictive of positive VCE. Results: Eighty-two VCE were included in the final analysis. Median age was 67.6 (IQR: 57.1-75.5) years and 38 (46.3%) patients were male. Thirty-seven (45.1%) VCE examinations were positive with the most common finding of angiectasia in 21 (55.3%). Risk factors for positive VCE are listed in Table 1. In univariate analysis, ACEi therapy associated with both positive VCE (P=0.014) and the presence of angiectasia (P=0.021), whereas ARB therapy did not associate with positive VCE. ACEi findings remained significant in bivariate analysis after controlling for cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities. Conclusion: In this single center study the presence of ACEi use was associated with small bowel and/or stomach angiectasias on VCE in univariate analysis and when controlled for cardiac and pulmonary risk factors. Further studies are required to determine the mechanistic impact of ACEi on gastrointestinal bleeding risk such as the reduction in von Willebrand factor or factors that affect platelet aggregation. Table 1. - Univariate predictors of positive video capsule endoscopy in iron deficiency anemia Negative VCE (n = 45) Positive VCE (n =37) P-value Age, years, mean (SD) 63.6 (15.8) 68.6 (9.3) 0.303 Male sex, n (%) 21 (46.7) 17 (46) 1 White race, n (%) 22 (48.9) 20 (54.1) 0.223 Active smoking, n (%) 6 (14) 11 (29.7) 0.105 Outpatient location, n (%) 31 (68.9) 21 (56.8) 0.357 Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 10 (22.2) 13 (35.1) 0.224 Chronic liver disease, n (%) 3 (6.7) 4 (10.8) 0.696 Congestive heart failure, n (%) 10 (22.2) 13 (35.1) 0.224 Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 15 (33.3) 15 (40.5) 0.645 Cardiac valvular disease, n (%) 7 (15.6) 6 (16.2) 1 Coronary artery disease, n (%) 14 (31.1) 14 (37.8) 0.641 Cardiac arrhythmia, n (%) 10 (22.2) 18 (48.7) 0.019 Chronic lung disease, n (%) 10 (22.2) 13 (35.1) 0.224 Left ventricular assist device, n (%) 2 (4.4) 2 (5.4) 1 Blood transfusion in the preceding 4 weeks, n (%) 17 (37.8) 16 (43.2) 0.656 Aspirin, n (%) 20 (44.4) 14 (37.8) 0.654 Thienopyridine, n (%) 3 (6.7) 2 (5.4) 1 Coumadin, n (%) 1 (2.2) 5 (13.5) 0.086 SSRI/SNRI, n (%) 7 (15.6) 9 (24.3) 0.404 ACEi 7 (15.6) 15 (40.5) 0.014 ARB 9 (20) 7 (18.9) 1 Hemoglobin, g/dL1 9.9 (1.7) 9.2 (2.3) 0.216 Platelets, 109/L1 225.4 (67.5) 208.6 (84.9) 0.202 BUN, mg/dL1 21.9 (13.1) 26.7 (22) 0.869 Creatinine, mg/dL1 1.3 (0.5) 1.9 (1.5) 0.197 Ferritin, ng/mL,1 128 (259) 39.6 (28.7) 0.966 Percent saturation, %1 14.8 (15.1) 13.7 (15.4) 0.76

Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in one-time gastro-small intestinal joint examination: a two-centre experience

BackgroundThe lesions of certain diseases are widely distributed in both stomach and small intestine, while the step-by-step strategy of gastroscopy followed by enteroscopy can be burdensome and costly. We aimed to determine if magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) could be used in one-time gastro-small intestine (GSI) joint examination.MethodsIn this study, data of patients in Chinese PLA General Hospital and Changhai Hospital who underwent MCE GSI examination from January 2020 to August 2021 were retrospectively analysed. The primary outcome of this study was the success rate of one-time GSI joint examination, and secondary outcomes included visualization and cleanliness of gastrointestinal tract, gastrointestinal transit times, diagnostic yield and safety of MCE examination.ResultsA total of 768 patients were included. The success rate of one-time GSI joint examination was 92.58%. There were 94.92% MCEs observed > 90% gastric mucosa in the 6 anatomic landmarks. The rate of complete small bowel examination was 97.40%. The median gastric examination time, gastric transit time and small intestine transit time were 8.18 min, 63.89 min and 4.89 h, respectively. Magnetic steering of MCE significantly decreased gastric transit time (8.92 min vs. 79.68 min, P = 0.001) and increased duodenal lesion detection rate (13.47% vs. 6.26%, P = 0.001) when compared with non-magnetic steering group. Two capsules were retained and were removed by enteroscopy or spontaneously excreted.ConclusionsMCE is feasible to complete GSI joint examination and the detection of both gastric and small intestinal diseases can be achieved simultaneously.Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05069233.

Resurgence of intestinal ascariasis among adults: radiological diagnosis and clinical implications.

To report the radiological features of intestinal ascariasis and to review the clinical implications of this re-emerging disease for adult population of the USA. This retrospective observational study involved 12 adult patients, whose radiological examinations disclosed unsuspected presence of ascaris in their intestinal tract. They were evaluated by computed tomography of the abdomen with oral contrast, small bowel series with barium, and magnetic resonance enterography. This series included 7 men and 5 women, who ranged in age from 19 to 72years (mean age 48years). The typical configuration of ascaris within the bowel loops was demonstrated on CT of the abdomen in 5 patients, small bowel examination with barium in 3, and by MR enterography in another 4 cases. Our study highlights the radiological appearances of intestinal ascariasis and the clinical implications of this resurging disease. The practicing radiologists should be aware of these findings, particularly when examining patients who have immigrated from or traveled to the endemic regions.

Gastrointestinal Bleeds.

Gastrointestinal Bleeds.

Capsule Endoscopy: Pitfalls and Approaches to Overcome.

Capsule endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract is an innovative technology that serves to replace conventional endoscopy. Wireless capsule endoscopy, which is mainly used for small bowel examination, has recently been used to examine the entire gastrointestinal tract. This method is promising for its usefulness and development potential and enhances convenience by reducing the side effects and discomfort that may occur during conventional endoscopy. However, capsule endoscopy has fundamental limitations, including passive movement via bowel peristalsis and space restriction. This article reviews the current scientific aspects of capsule endoscopy and discusses the pitfalls and approaches to overcome its limitations. This review includes the latest research results on the role and potential of capsule endoscopy as a non-invasive diagnostic and therapeutic device.

Fully automated magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for examination of the stomach and small bowel: a prospective, feasibility, two-centre study

The use of magnetically controlled capsules for gastroscopy is in the early stages of clinical adoption. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fully automated magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (FAMCE) system in clinical practice for gastroscopy and small bowel examination. We did a prospective, comparative study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FAMCE. Patients from two hospitals in Chongqing, China were consecutively enrolled. Eligible participants were aged 18-80 years with suspected gastric pathology and no previous surgery. Participants underwent FAMCE for screening of gastric lesions, then conventional transoral gastroscopy 2 h later, and stomach examination results were compared. The primary outcome was the rate of complete detection of gastric anatomy landmarks (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) by FAMCE. Secondary outcomes were the time required for gastric completion by FAMCE, the rate of detection of gastric lesions by FAMCE compared with conventional transoral gastroscopy, and the rate of complete small bowel examination. Adverse events were also evaluated. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000040507. Between May 12 and Aug 17, 2020, 114 patients (mean age 44·0 years [IQR 34·0-55·0]; 63 [55%] female) were enrolled. The rate of complete detection of gastric anatomical structures by FAMCE was 100% (95% CI 99·3-100·0). The concordance between FAMCE and conventional transoral gastroscopy was 99·61% (99·45-99·78). The mean completion time of a gastroscopy with FAMCE was 19·17 min (SD 1·43; median 19·00, IQR 19·00-20·00), compared with 5·21 min (2·00; 5·18, 3·68-6·45) for conventional transoral gastroscopy. In 114 enrolled patients, 214 lesions were detected by FAMCE and conventional transoral gastroscopy. Of those, 193 were detected by both modalities. FAMCE missed five pathologies (four cases of gastritis and one polyp), whereas conventional transoral gastroscopy missed 16 pathologies (12 cases of gastritis, one polyp, one fundal xanthoma, and two antral erosions). FAMCE was able to provide a complete small bowel examination for all 114 patients and detected intestinal lesions in 50 (44%) patients. During the study, two (2%) patients experienced adverse events. No serious adverse events were recorded, and there was no evidence of capsule retention. The performance of FAMCE is similar to conventional transoral gastroscopy in completion of gastric examination and lesion detection. Furthermore, it can provide a complete small bowel examination. Therefore, FAMCE could be effective method for examination of the gastrointestinal tract. Chinese National Key Research and Development Program.

Two simultaneous intussusceptions in a neonate with DiGeorge syndrome: A case report

Background: Double simultaneous intussusception is a peculiar and rare variety of intussusception with only 3 previously reported neonatal cases. Case presentation: A 15-day-old male neonate with respiratory distress was found to have Tetralogy of Fallot and hypoplastic pulmonary stenosis. Small bowel intussusception was diagnosed on ultrasound abdomen following hematochezia on the next day. Emergency laparotomy revealed two intussusceptions, ileocolic and jejunojejunal, with bowel gangrenous requiring resection and anastomosis. No pathological lead point was identified. He recovered with supportive care and was discharged. Conclusion: Simultaneously occurring double intussusceptions are extremely rare in neonates, and thorough examination of the entire small bowel in cases of intussusception is key to the diagnosis.

Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding – A Multimodal Imaging Approach

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding represents one of the most frequently encountered clinical case scenarios in the emergency department. In the United States, the annual rate of hospitalization for any type of GI hemorrhage accounts for 300/100,000 population, with more than 1,000,000 hospitalizations each year and an approximately mortality rate of 5%. Upper GI bleeding (UGIB) is more common than lower GI bleeding (LGIB), yet there are many sites and multiple lesions from which bleeding could occur and the source could remain unidentified after upper endoscopy or colonoscopy evaluation. The uncertain etiology of GI hemorrhage is traditionally defined as obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) and constitutes a diagnostic challenge, so accurate investigations are crucial. Even if the mainstay of initial evaluation consists of upper endoscopy, colonoscopy or contrast X-ray studies, current guidelines suggest that video capsule endoscopy, push enteroscopy, angiography and radionuclide imaging are best suited, allowing an appropriate examination of the entire small bowel, which represents the most common source of OGIB. Hence, the aim of this review is to provide a multimodal investigation approach and to highlight the most adequate imaging technique according to the leading cause of OGIB.

Oral ingestion versus endoscopic delivery of endoscopic capsule in patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (ORENCES study): A Spanish multicentre observational study

BackgroundSmall Bowel Capsule Endoscopy is the first-choice technique for investigating the majority of small bowel diseases. Its most common complications are related to incomplete examinations and capsule retention. There is no consensus on how patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery should receive the capsule. ObjectiveThe primary endpoint was to compare the rate of complete small-bowel examinations (completion rate) between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery of the capsule. The secondary endpoint was to compare diagnostic yield and adverse events in the two groups. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted in nine hospitals in Spain. Demographic data, previous surgery, indication for capsule endoscopy, intestinal transit time, diagnosis, completion rate (percentage of capsules reaching the caecum), diagnostic yield (percentage of results compatible with indication for the exam) and adverse events were collected. ResultsFrom January 2009 to May 2019 fifty-seven patients were included (39 male, mean age 66±15 years). The most common indications for the exam were “overt” (50.9%) and “occult” (35.1%) small bowel bleeding. Previous Billroth II gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were present in 52.6% and 17.5% of patients respectively. The capsule was swallowed in 34 patients and placed endoscopically in 23 patients. No significant differences were observed between the oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery groups in terms of completion rate (82.4% vs. 78.3%; p=0.742), diagnostic yield (41.2% vs. 52.2%; p=0.432) or small bowel transit time (301 vs. 377min, p=0.118). No capsule retention occurred. Only one severe adverse event (anastomotic perforation) was observed in the endoscopic delivery group. ConclusionsIn our case series, there were no significant differences between oral ingestion and endoscopic delivery in terms of completion rate, diagnostic yield or safety. Being less invasive, oral ingestion of the capsule should be the first-choice method in patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery.

Self-propelled capsule endoscopy for small-bowel examination: Proof-of-concept and model verification

This paper reports the experimental study of a vibro-impact self-propulsion technique applying for small-bowel endoscopy by using a mesoscale capsule prototype, which is 56.9 mm in length and 19.4 mm in diameter. Based on nonsmooth multibody dynamics, a mathematical model is developed for studying the dynamical characteristics of the prototype. Numerical and experimental results are compared to validate the efficacy of the proposed model as well as the feasibility of the technique under various frictional environments. By using the model, we can reveal some hidden dynamics of the prototype and optimise its progression speed and energy efficiency. Based on our calculations, by adopting this technique, the standard-sized capsule, which is 26 mm in length and 11 mm in diameter, can achieve the maximum average speeds of 8.49 mm/s for forward progression and 4.9 mm/s for backward progression, offering the potential for a ‘live’ and controllable small-bowel examination.

2987 Significance of Small Intestine Search in Dysphagia of Elderly People

INTRODUCTION: Patients suspected of having small bowel disease tend to increase, and even in the elderly, it is often necessary to perform small bowel examination. However, elderly people often have dysphagia and may not be able to perform capsule endoscopy (CE) examination. The use of an advanced capsule endoscope insertion aid and an overtube was used to examine the usefulness of small intestine examination in elderly people with difficult swallowing. METHODS: In this study, patients aged 75 years and older who required small-bowel examination were treated as patients with dysphagia who required device as group A and patients who did not use as group B. We compared clinical data and retrospectively examined the usefulness of CE in elderly people with dysphagia. From July 2015 to April 2019, our hospital performed CE were 273 cases, 247 patients, elderly people over the age of 75 were 154 cases, 139 patients. Group A: 21 cases, 21 patients. Group B: 133 cases, 118 patients. RESULTS: Gender differences are male/female, A group 9/12, B group 62/71. The average age was 85.8 years for A group and 82.3 years for B group (P = 0.0018). Stomach transit time (min): A group average 64.9, B group average 53.9, small intestine transit time (min): A group average 350.4, B group average 349.9. In blood examination, RBC (× 104/μl): A group average 314.8, B group average 331.2, Hgb (g/dl): A group average 9.24, B group average 9.74, Alb (g/dl): A group average 3.08, B group average 3.43 (P = 0.0156), Cre (mg/dl): A group average 1.77, B group average 1.14 (P = 0.0060). Anticoagulant medications were 14 in A group (66.7%) and 74 in B group (55.6%). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): A group 11.1, B group 22.0 (P &lt; 0.0001). In OGIB for inspection purposes, 17 cases were A group (80.9%) and 100 cases were B group (75.2%). The incidence rate was 11 in A group (52.4%) and 78 in B group (58.6%) (P = 0.5890). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients who require small-bowel examination, it was possible to obtain the same finding rate as subjects who can swallow it, using a CE insertion aid together.

Feasibility and safety of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy in minors

Objective: To clarify the feasibility and safety of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy (MGCE) in minors. Methods: A descriptive cohort study was carried out to retrospectively collect the data of minors (<18 years) who underwent MGCE in Ruijin Hospital from April 2015 to October 2018. Exclusion criteria: patients with dysphagia, obvious gastrointestinal bleeding, diagnosed or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, or congenital gastrointestinal malformations or intestinal fistula; patients with previous bowel surgery, or in poor general condition; patients with implants; pregnant patients; patients with incomplete data or without data. A total of 218 patients, including 122 males and 96 females, with mean age of (12.0±3.1) (5-17) years and 236 times of examination were included. The capsule size of the Ankon MGCE system was 11.8 mm×27 mm, taking two pictures per second, with a viewing angle of 140 degrees. Data of gastric visualization (0% to 100%), gastric cleanliness (satisfactory cleanliness was defined as a clear display of the gastric mucosa; the effect of bubbles or mucus on the visual field was negligible, or the gastric mucosa was slightly blurred; a small amount of air bubbles or mucus affected slightly the field of view), gastric or small bowel examination time, lesion detection rate, etc. were recorded. All the patients were followed up for 2 weeks to confirm capsule excretion and to record adverse events. Results: A total of 202 patients (217 times) completed gastric examination and 112 patients (125 times) completed small bowel examination. The median gastric visualization of cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus was 100%, 90% (75%,100%), 100% (80%,100%), 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The cleanliness of the gastric cardia, fundus, body, angle, antrum, and pylorus was assessed to be satisfactory in 100.0%, 76.5% (153/200), 92.5% (185/200), 97.5% (195/200), 99.5% (199/200), and 100.0% of patients, respectively. In 202 patients undergoing gastric examination, the median gastric exanimation time was 10.5 (7.3, 13.9) minutes. In 112 patients undergoing small bowel examination, the median gastric transit time was 51.5 (20.6, 112.0) minutes and the median small bowel transit time was 232.4 (181.8, 321.6) minutes. The small bowel transit rate was 91.1% (102/112). The lesion detection rates of stomach, duodenum and jejunoileum were 18.8% (38/202), 8.1% (10/124) and 26.8% (30/112) respectively. No complications or adverse events occurred. Conclusion: MGCE is feasible and safe to detect both gastric cavity and small bowel in minors.