Evidence-based Medicine Curriculum Research Articles

Implementation of an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum for Postgraduate Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Fellows.

Within physician assistant (PA) education, the inclusion of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is mandatory. Despite existing literature on EBM training methodologies for PA students and emergency medicine (EM) physician residents, there exists a dearth of published data concerning EBM instruction within postgraduate PA EM programs. A pilot study is described providing an overview of implementation of an EBM curriculum in a single-institution postgraduate physician assistant and nurse practitioner emergency medicine fellowship. Quantitative data using pre-curriculum and post-curriculum surveys were collected. The curriculum included statistical concept screencasts, required attendance at a journal club with assigned topics for discussion, and used a critical appraisal tool designed to help fellows better analyze and understand the articles being reviewed. Upon graduation, fellows participated in structured interviews to collect qualitative data about the curriculum and application of learned concepts to the clinical setting. There was a statistically significant improvement in fellows' reported confidence in discussing the medical literature with practicing providers ( P = .02). However, there was no difference in prescores and postscores on EBM knowledge questions or on fellows' feelings of importance of EBM to clinical practice. Qualitative data revealed several themes, including helpfulness of tools provided in the curriculum, appreciation of curricular changes made secondary to fellow suggestions, and reports of improvement in reviewing medical literature and comfort in participation in local journal clubs upon graduation from the fellowship program. Limitations, including small sample size and validity concerns, are discussed. Positive changes were made to the curriculum based on qualitative data collected. The authors advocate for subsequent investigations into this subject within a multi-institutional and multispecialty context, thereby enhancing the breadth of the findings. Nevertheless, this study furnishes the initial accessible substantiation of the viability of introducing an EBM curriculum within this specific demographic.

Longitudinal Integrated Ambulatory, Didactic, and Evidenced-Based Medicine Curriculum in Internal Medicine.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) endorses evolving scholarly education regarding evidence-based medicine (EBM) and its clinical application in Internal Medicine (IM). The IM residents at Navy Medical Readiness and Training Center San Diego (NMRTC-SD) communicated the need for both increased ambulatory didactic sessions as well as a formal EBM curriculum. Prior to the academic year of 2021-2022, no formal ambulatory or EBM curriculum existed. In July 2021, an integrated EBM-ambulatory curriculum was implemented. A pre-curriculum needs assessment was performed and thereafter an eight-session integrated ambulatory-EBM curriculum was implemented in the 2021-2022 academic year. Faculty members facilitated small group discussions focused on a particular didactic topic and EBM principle and integrated the learning of both into one session. After each session, residents completed a feedback form. At the end of the year, a post-curriculum needs assessment was collected. Thirty-four residents of all post-graduate years (PGY) levels participated from July 2021 to June 2022. Primary outcomes were satisfaction with the didactic portion of the curriculum, perception of receipt of adequate training in EBM principles, and perception of level of competency in practicing EBM principles. Overall, participants reported a substantial increase in satisfaction with didactic teaching and a large increase in the perceived competency in practicing EBM principles. This integrated didactic-EBM curriculum represents an effective method of incorporating didactic topics in IM with the teaching and application of EBM principles, which improved resident satisfaction with the curricula and self-perception of competency in critically appraising medical literature.

Efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval of community family physicians at the point of care: exploring the associations with information and computer literacy

Objective: This study aimed to measure the association between the efficacy/efficiency of digital information retrieval among community family physicians at the point of care and information and computer literacy. Methods: This study is a part of a cross-sectional anonymous online survey-based study among community family physicians who reported no affiliation with an academic institution in eight Arab countries. Results: A total of 72 physicians were included. The mean total score for the information literacy scale was 59.8 out of 91 (SD = 11.4). The mean score was 29.3 (SD = 5.6) out of 55 on the computer literacy scale. A one-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant association between information literacy and information retrieval efficacy (F (2,69) = 4.466, p = 0.015) and efficiency of information retrieval (F (2.69) = 4.563, p = 0.014). Computer literacy was not associated with information retrieval efficacy or efficiency. Conclusion: The information and computer literacy scores of community family physicians in eight Arab countries are average. Information literacy, rather than computer literacy, is positively associated with the efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval at the point of care. There is room for improvement in evidence-based medicine curricula and continuous professional development to improve information literacy for better information retrieval and patient care.

Student and educator perceptions of an evidence-based medicine research curriculum: recommendations for research curriculum development

Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) allows physicians to integrate evidence, clinical experience, and patient values into clinical decision making and thus has been readily incorporated into medical education; however, there is limited research capturing the perceptions of both student and educator in their experiences in engaging with an EBM-based research curriculum. Assessing the perceptions of both these key stakeholders represents an important area of research as it can help to inform EBM curriculum integration and evaluation efforts.
 Methods: This qualitative study utilizes a constructivist framework to assess the thoughts, beliefs, and feelings of students and tutors interacting with a 2-year EBM-based research curriculum. Students completed semi-structured interviews and tutors completed online surveys to explore their perceptions and experiences. Interview transcripts and survey responses were analysed using conventional descriptive content analysis to create a set of recommendations for EBM curriculum development.
 Results: 13 students and 20 tutors participated, and four major themes were identified. Students noted EBM education was most effective when opportunities existed to apply research skills, complete practical research experience, engage actively in learning, and integrate clinical and research concepts. Tutors found the curriculum to be effective but noted it was challenging to accommodate for the diversity of student knowledge and interest in research.
 Conclusion: This study provides a general set of recommendations for the design, implementation, and refinement of EBM-based research curricula to facilitate student learning through focusing on 1) research consumption, 2) emphasizing application, 3) emphasizing interactivity, 4) curriculum integration, and 5) catering towards student heterogeneity.

Comparison of two validated evidence‐based medicine assessments: Do they correlate?

It was hypothesized that these instruments do not correlate between one another, based on inherent differences between them, including assessment format, grading method, and scoring range. The authors sought to examine whether a correlation between the results of these two instruments exists in a population of U.S. medical students. A retrospective cohort study of 158 fourth-year U.S. medical students in academic year 2018-2019 was conducted. All students were exposed to a focused EBM curriculum, consisting of three guided discussions of separate journal articles clinically relevant to the practice of emergency medicine. Outcomes measured included scores on both the ACE tool and Fresno test using descriptive statistics. Spearman's rho was used to determine the correlation between the ACE and Fresno scores for each student among the entire group. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess for correlations at more extreme data points. The median scores on the ACE tool and Fresno test were 66.7% and 62.7%. There was no statistically significant correlation between the results of these two assessments (Spearman's rho 0.023, p=0.774) in our population. The scores from the subgroup of advanced performers on the Fresno test showed a weak statistically significant positive correlation (p=0.045) to advanced scores on the ACE tool. No other subgroups showed statistically significant correlation. In our population of U.S. medical students, the results of two known EBM assessment instruments do not correlate with one another. The assessments may differ in what categories of learning they measure or in generalizability or perhaps in what depth of understanding they test overall. Further study is needed to determine what each instrument is measuring and whether there is demonstrable variation across populations.

Evidence-based medicine needs patient and public involvement to remain relevant: A proposal for a new curriculum

IntroductionPublic partnerships, a route to sharing expertise, networks and resources anchored in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, has been championed by multiple stakeholders. ObjectiveTo propose a new evidence-based medicine (EBM) curriculum for harnessing patient and public expertise to ensure that EBM teaching and learning can become more relevant and impactful. MethodsA curriculum development group comprising of EBM teachers, patient and public involvement representatives, clinicians, clinical epidemiologists, public health experts and educationalists, with experience of delivering and evaluating face-to-face and online EBM courses across many countries and continents, prepared a new EBM course. ResultsA student-centred, problem-based and clinically integrated course for teaching and learning EBM was developed. In the spirit of shared decision-making, practitioners can learn to support patients, articulate their perspectives, recognise the need for their contribution and ensure community involvement when generating and applying evidence. With end users in mind, the application of research findings, delivery of care and EBM effectiveness in the workplace would carry increased priority. ConclusionsEmbracing patients as EBM collaborators can help deliver cognitive diversity and inspire different ways of thinking and working. Adopting the proposed approach in EBM education lays the foundations for a joint practitioner–patient partnership to ask, acquire, appraise and apply EBM in a more holistic context which will strengthen the EBM proposition.

Developing Palliative Medicine as an Accredited Medical Specialty in Kenya

PURPOSEMost people living with life-limiting illnesses in Kenya lack access to palliative care. Globally, palliative medicine is a growing specialty that equips clinicians with the training required to improve the quality of life for people living with a wide variety of serious illnesses. Optimal delivery relies on a skilled workforce with specialty-level training, and we identified the absence of board-accredited training programs for clinical officers (COs) and physicians as a barrier to providing high-quality palliative care in Kenya.METHODSWe held a series of stakeholder meetings with expert palliative care clinicians, leaders, and educators from Kenya and other countries to develop and implement a comprehensive, evidence-based palliative medicine curriculum for COs.RESULTSWe developed a higher diploma program that is being administered by the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital College in Eldoret, Kenya, with faculty from Moi University School of Medicine and affiliated institutions. We have collaborated to create the first diploma awarding program in palliative medicine in Kenya. Our efforts have led the Kenyan CO Council adding palliative medicine to their list of recognized and licensed specialties. COs are now enrolled in an 18-month program that will lead to a higher diploma and national recognition as palliative care specialists.CONCLUSIONEarly building of consensus and educating policymakers, regulatory bodies, and government personnel was an important step to overcome the challenge of palliative care misconceptions. The unique capacity of global partnerships and early and frequent stakeholder involvement is critical in novel program development. Local ownership of such in-country programs is key, and the stakeholders should be included in strategies for sustainability.

Description and Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Residency Curriculum Using the Evidence-Based Medicine Environment Survey.

Teaching medical trainees evidence-based medicine (EBM) is required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Most published graduate EBM curricula focus on critical appraisal over point-of-care information mastery. Faculty at the University of Rochester Family Medicine Residency implemented a clinically integrated, cyclical EBM curriculum juxtaposing information mastery with expert-level skills such as critical appraisal. We administered the Evidence-Based Medicine Environment Survey (EBMES) to learners before and after the yearlong curriculum. Two cohorts of participating third-year residents completed the EBMES before and after an EBM curriculum. Over 2 years, 21 residents completed pre- and postevaluations. Resident perception of the EBM educational and practice environment was high at baseline and improved for 15 of 36 survey items (P<.05). Resident perception of the EBM learning environment improved after participation in a yearlong curriculum. Nearly all of the content covered in the "Science of Family Medicine" curriculum and measured by EBMES improved in a statistically significant manner. We propose that EBM curricula should combine traditional literature search and critical appraisal skills with information mastery to maximize effectiveness. Our curriculum can be modified to fit other graduate family medicine contexts.

Implementing a flipped classroom model in an evidence-based medicine curriculum for pre-clinical medical students: evaluating learning effectiveness through prospective propensity score-matched cohorts

BackgroundIn a flipped classroom (FC) model, blended learning is used to increase student engagement and learning by having students finish their readings at home and work on problem-solving with tutors during class time. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) integrates clinical experience and patient values with the best evidence-based research to inform clinical decisions. To implement a FC and EBM, students require sufficient information acquisition and problem-solving skills. Therefore, a FC is regarded as an excellent teaching model for tutoring EBM skills. However, the effectiveness of a FC for teaching EBM competency has not been rigorously investigated in pre-clinical educational programs. In this study, we used an innovative FC model in a pre-clinical EBM teaching program.MethodsFC’s teaching was compared with a traditional teaching model by using an assessment framework of prospective propensity score matching, which reduced the potential difference in basic characteristics between the two groups of students on 1:1 ratio. For the outcome assessments of EBM competency, we used an analysis of covariance and multivariate linear regression analysis to investigate comparative effectiveness between the two teaching models. A total of 90 students were prospectively enrolled and assigned to the experimental or control group using 1:1 propensity matching.ResultsCompared with traditional teaching methods, the FC model was associated with better learning outcomes for the EBM competency categories of Ask, Acquire, Appraise, and Apply for both written and oral tests at the end of the course (all p-values< 0.001). In particular, the “appraise” skill for the written test (6.87 ± 2.20) vs. (1.47 ± 1.74), p < 0.001), and the “apply” skill for the oral test (7.34 ± 0.80 vs. 3.97 ± 1.24, p < 0.001) had the biggest difference between the two groups.ConclusionsAfter adjusting for a number of potential confunding factors, our study findings support the effectiveness of applying an FC teaching model to cultivate medical students’ EBM literacy.

Using Self-Determination Theory to Drive an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum for Pediatric Residents: A Mixed Methods Study.

The ability to incorporate evidence-based medicine (EBM) into clinical practice is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency, yet many pediatric residents have limited knowledge in this area. The objective of this study is to describe the effect of an EBM curriculum on resident attitudes and clinical use of EBM. We implemented a longitudinal EBM curriculum to review key literature and guidelines and teach EBM principles. In this Institutional Review Board-exempt mixed methods study, we surveyed residents, fellows, and faculty about resident use of EBM at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention. We conducted point prevalence surveys of faculty about residents' EBM use on rounds. Residents participated in focus groups, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using conventional content analysis to develop themes. Residents (N=61 pre- and 70 post-curriculum) reported an increased appreciation for the importance of EBM and comfort generating a search question. Faculty reported that residents cited EBM on rounds, with an average of 2.4 citations/week. Cited evidence reinforced faculty's plans 79% of the time, taught faculty something new 57% of the time, and changed management 21% of the time. Focus groups with 22 trainees yielded 4 themes: 1) increased competence in understanding methodology and evidence quality; 2) greater autonomy in application of EBM; 3) a call for relatedness from faculty role models and a culture that promotes EBM; and 4) several barriers to successful use of EBM. After implementation of a longitudinal EBM curriculum, trainees described increased use of EBM in clinical practice.

Simulated Randomized Controlled Trial to Learn Critical Appraisal (SiRCA): A Randomized Controlled Study of Effectiveness Among Undergraduate Medical Students.

Introduction: The ideal method to teach evidence-based medicine (EBM) to medical students is unclear. We determined the effectiveness of a simulated randomized controlled trial (RCT) in improving critical appraisal and EBM skills among medical students compared to traditional training.Methods: One hundred and eighteen medical students were randomized into two groups. Sixty-one students (immersion arm) were trained in critical appraisal using a simulated RCT aimed at determining efficacy of a “brainy pill” on ability to crack puzzles. Fifty-seven students (traditional group) were trained using a journal club with a checklist. Primary outcome of change in knowledge and skills of critical appraisal and EBM was determined by comparing scores on pre- and post-intervention Fresno tests.Results: Mean age of students was 21.76 (SD - 0.78) years. Seventy (59.3%) were females and 48 (40.7%) males. Mean pre-test scores of traditional and immersion groups were 8.0 (SD - 4.88) and 9.31 (SD - 5.49) respectively and post-test scores were 50.2 (SD - 16.2) and 68.12 (SD - 14.72) respectively (post-intervention mean difference - 17.92; 95% CI 12.26 - 23.57; p<0.0000001). Odds of achieving 65% or more in post-intervention Fresno test score was significantly higher in immersion group (29.8% vs 8.2%; OR 4.76; 95% CI 1.62-13.97; p = 0.001). Perceived competence regarding EBM skills improved significantly in immersion group.Conclusions: Simulated RCT is effective in imparting critical appraisal and EBM practice skills to medical students. Trainers should consider integrating and reinforcing this approach in EBM curriculum to make learning contextual and immersive.

Evidence-based medicine curricula and barriers for physicians in training: a scoping review.

ObjectivesTo describe the published literature on EBM curricula for physicians in training and barriers during curriculum implementation. MethodsWe performed a systematic search and review of the medical literature on PubMed, Embase, ERIC, Scopus and Web of Science from the earliest available date until September 4, 2019. ResultsWe screened 9,042 references and included 29 full-text studies and 14 meeting abstracts. Eighteen studies had moderate validity, and 6 had high validity. The EBM curricular structure proved highly variable in between studies. The majority of the EBM curricula was longitudinal with different lengths. Only five studies reported using Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development. Twenty-one articles reported on EBM skills and knowledge, and only 5/29 full-text articles used a validated assessment tool. Time was the main barrier to EBM curriculum implementation. All the included studies and abstracts, independent of the EBM curriculum structure or evaluation method used, found an improvement in the residents' attitudes and/or EBM skills and knowledge. ConclusionsThe current body of literature available to guide educators in EBM curriculum development is enough to constitute a strong scaffold for developing any EBM curriculum. Given the amount of time and resources needed to develop and implement an EBM curriculum, it is very important to follow the curriculum development steps and use validated assessment tools.

Consensus on evidence-based medicine curriculum contents for healthcare schools in Brazil

ObjectivesHealthcare professionals need to take into account their knowledge, skills and attitudes to develop a focused clinical question, perform an effective search of the literature, critically appraise the evidence, and...

Integrating an evidence-based medicine curriculum into physician assistant education: Teaching skills for lifelong decision-making!

Background: Medical knowledge continuously evolves and to help health care providers to stay up to date, the evidence-based medicine (EBM) model has emerged. The practice of EBM requires new skills of the health care provider, including directed literature searches, the critical evaluation of research studies and the direct application of the findings to patient care. Methods: This paper describes the integration and evaluation of an evidence-based medicine course sequence into a Physician Assistant curriculum utilizing the expertise from faculty trained in basic science, nursing and primary care practice. Results: Collaboration of faculty with different educational backgrounds resulted in a course series that was equally strong in all aspects of EBM. This new course sequence teaches students to manage and use the best clinical research evidence to competently practice medicine. To assess the effectiveness of the EBM sequence a survey was developed and administered at the beginning and end of the sequence. Conclusion: EBM knowledge gained is essential to effective clinical decision making and this newly developed tool specifically helps to identify student competencies within the defined course objectives. Contributing to the uniqueness of the tool are case-based questions requiring integration of EBM knowledge by the student.

Teaching Medical Epistemology within an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum

Issue: Epistemology, the branch of philosophy that deals with the nature, value, and use of knowledge, receives little or no formal attention in medical education. Yet the understanding of medical epistemology - focused on what kinds of medical knowledge are relevant to clinical decisions, the strengths and limitations of those different kinds of knowledge, and how they relate to one another and to clinical expertise - represents a critical aspect of medical practice. Evidence: Understanding the meaning of the term “evidence” is one of the fundamental tasks of medical epistemology. Other foundations of the evidence-based medicine movement, such as the “hierarchy of evidence” and the concept of “best” evidence, rest upon epistemological assertions, claims regarding the appropriate kinds and relative value of knowledge in medicine. Here we rely upon the work of philosophers of medicine who have been engaged in debates regarding the epistemic tenets of the evidence-based medicine movement. We argue that medical students and physicians-in-training should learn basic terminology and methods of epistemology as they are being introduced to the concepts and techniques of evidence-based medicine. Implications: The skepticism and critical analysis encouraged by EBM can and should be applied to the underlying assumptions and primary tenets of EBM itself. It is not enough for philosophers to partake in this endeavor; students, trainees, and clinicians need to carefully and constantly examine the reasons and reasoning that coalesce into clinical acumen. Our role as medical educators is to give them the tools, including a basic understanding of epistemology, to do that over a lifetime.

Integrating evidence-based medicine skills into a medical school curriculum: a quantitative outcomes assessment

ObjectivesThis research project aims to determine the potential differential impact of two curricular approaches to teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM) on student performance on an EBM assignment administered during the first...

25. WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE? EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF A RESIDENT EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE CURRICULUM

Background The ability to incorporate evidence-based medicine (EBM) into clinical practice is an ACGME competency, yet many pediatric residents have limited knowledge, comfort, and skill in this area. In addition, there is a lack of data regarding how residents apply EBM curricula to clinical practice. Objective: Describe the effect of an EBM curriculum on resident attitudes and clinical use of EBM. Methods We implemented a twice-weekly EBM curriculum to review key literature and guidelines. In this IRB-exempt mixed methods study, we surveyed residents, fellows, and faculty about use of EBM at baseline and 6 months later. Results were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. We surveyed faculty twice weekly about residents’ EBM use on rounds. Residents participated in focus groups, which were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded using conventional content analysis to develop themes. Results Residents (N=61 pre- and 41 post-curriculum) reported increased: satisfaction with conferences (p=0.0037), importance of EBM (p = 0.0041), comfort generating a search question (p= 0.0001), and citation of evidence on rounds (p Conclusion As a result of this EBM curriculum, trainees described increased use of EBM in clinical practice and better understanding of research methodology. Additionally, resident use of EBM reinforced plans, taught faculty, and at times, changed management. Ongoing work is needed to create a culture that promotes EBM.

A prospective study evaluating the integration of a multifaceted evidence-based medicine curriculum into early years in an undergraduate medical school

BackgroundThe importance of ensuring medical students are equipped with the skills to be able to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been increasingly recognized in recent years. However, there is limited information on an effective EBM curriculum for undergraduate medical schools. This study aims to test the feasibility of integrating a multifaceted EBM curriculum in the early years of an undergraduate medical school. This was subsequently evaluated using the validated Fresno test and students’ self-reported knowledge and attitudes as they progressed through the curriculum.MethodsEBM was integrated horizontally and vertically into the curriculum into the first 2 years of undergraduate medical school. First year medical students were recruited to participate in the study. The 212-point Fresno test was administered along with a locally developed questionnaire at baseline before EBM teaching in year one and at the end of EBM teaching in year two.ResultsThirty-one students participated at baseline and 55 students participated at the end of second year EBM teaching. For the 18 students who completed the Fresno at both time points, the average score increased by 38.7 marks (p < 0.001) after EBM teaching. Students felt confident in formulating clinical questions and in critically appraising journal articles after EBM teaching. EBM was perceived to be important to their future practice as a doctor and for improving patient outcomes at both time points.ConclusionsIt has been feasible to integrate a multifaceted, EBM curriculum from the first year of an undergraduate medical program. Early evaluation of the curriculum using the Fresno test has shown a significant increase in students’ EBM knowledge. The curriculum also demonstrated an increase in students’ perceptions of the clinical relevance of EBM in their developing practice.

Implementation of an evidence-based medicine curriculum in a fellowship program: Can it influence clinical practice?

ABSTRACT While evidence-based medicine (EBM) curricula improves knowledge scores, correlation with physician behavior, and patient outcomes are not clear. We established an EBM curriculum for Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine fellows that included didactic teaching, opportunity for deliberate practice and presentation, and coaching and feedback from faculty experts, to determine the impact on self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI) competency rating and patient care decisions. Seventeen fellows at a New York City academic medical center participated during 2014–2015 academic year. We analyzed pre-/posttest surveys for self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM concepts, EBM worksheets for content of clinical questions and impact on patient care, and PBLI competency ratings for overall impact. Posttest survey indicated that fellows’ self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM increased significantly. While most found Journal Club discussions and EBM case conferences valuable, only 36% of fellows found EBM worksheets completion to be good use of time (average completion time 89 minutes). EBM worksheets helped reinforce or change plan of care in 32 out of 50 cases. There was no impact on end-of-the-year PBLI ratings. This curriculum, integrating didactic, self-directed and peer learning with objective feedback, increased self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM, and influenced patient care plans.

A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education

BackgroundThe importance of teaching the skills and practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) for medical professionals has steadily grown in recent years. Alongside this growth is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of EBM curriculum as assessed by competency in the five ‘A’s’: asking, acquiring, appraising, applying and assessing (impact and performance). EBM educators in medical education will benefit from a compendium of existing assessment tools for assessing EBM competencies in their settings. The purpose of this review is to provide a systematic review and taxonomy of validated tools that evaluate EBM teaching in medical education.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Educational Resources Information Centre (ERIC), Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) databases and references of retrieved articles published between January 2005 and March 2019. We have presented the identified tools along with their psychometric properties including validity, reliability and relevance to the five domains of EBM practice and dimensions of EBM learning. We also assessed the quality of the tools to identify high quality tools as those supported by established interrater reliability (if applicable), objective (non-self-reported) outcome measures and achieved ≥ 3 types of established validity evidence. We have reported our study in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsWe identified 1719 potentially relevant articles of which 63 full text articles were assessed for eligibility against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve articles each with a unique and newly identified tool were included in the final analysis. Of the twelve tools, all of them assessed the third step of EBM practice (appraise) and four assessed just that one step. None of the twelve tools assessed the last step of EBM practice (assess). Of the seven domains of EBM learning, ten tools assessed knowledge gain, nine assessed skills and-one assessed attitude. None addressed reaction to EBM teaching, self-efficacy, behaviours or patient benefit. Of the twelve tools identified, six were high quality. We have also provided a taxonomy of tools using the CREATE framework, for EBM teachers in medical education.ConclusionsSix tools of reasonable validity are available for evaluating most steps of EBM and some domains of EBM learning. Further development and validation of tools that evaluate all the steps in EBM and all educational outcome domains are needed.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42018116203.