Previous work suggested differences between patients taking patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in real-world risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and edema hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits (edema events). We further investigated these differences to assess economic importance. Retrospective study using published event rates and mean costs derived from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart (CDM) Database. We designed a model to estimate adjusted economic offsets that combined respective patiromer and SZC HF hospitalization (25.1 and 35.8; difference 10.7 [95% confidence interval [CI]2: 2.6-18.8]) and edema event (3.4 and 7.1; difference 3.6 [95% CI: 1.7-7.1]) rates/100 person-years from the original published work with costs from our parallel data extract spanning 2019-2021, adjusted to 2021 US dollars. In a base case of mean HF hospitalization, edema event, and 30-count potassium-binder prescription costs from our data extract, the estimated mean savings with patiromer was $1,428 per person per year (PPPY; 95% CI: -$1,508 to $4,652). Respective costs PPPY for patiromer vs SZC were $8,526 vs $12,622 (difference $4,096 [95% CI: $1,160-$7,320]) for HF hospitalization and edema events, and $10,649 vs $7,981 (difference -$2,668) for potassium binders, totaling $19,175 for patiromer vs $20,603 for SZC. With differing drug costs, hospitalization and ED costs offset this difference when event rates were numerically small. Model outcomes were driven by HF hospitalization cost and least influenced by edema ED visit cost. A limitation was that the CDM data extract may differ from the original work.