You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Markers1 Apr 20112326 ENGRAILED-2 (EN2): A URINARY BIOMARKER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER WITHOUT DRE Hardev Pandha, Mohammed Ismail, Angie Boxall, Aagna Bhatt, Stephen Langley, Richard Hindley, and Richard Morgan Hardev PandhaHardev Pandha Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Mohammed IsmailMohammed Ismail Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Angie BoxallAngie Boxall Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Aagna BhattAagna Bhatt Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Stephen LangleyStephen Langley Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Richard HindleyRichard Hindley Basingstoke, United Kingdom More articles by this author , and Richard MorganRichard Morgan Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2573AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer related death in men. A number of key limitations with prostate specific antigen (PSA), currently the standard detection test, has justified evaluation of new biomarkers. Recently described biomarkers are complex, expensive, often identify ‘high risk' but are not immediately diagnostic and not easily adopted into clinical practice. We have assessed the diagnostic potential of EN2 protein, a homeodomain-containing transcription factor expressed in PC cell lines and secreted into the urine by PC in men. Detection of EN2 was simple and inexpensive. METHODS EN2 expression in PC cell lines and prostate cancer tissue was determined by semi-quantative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. First pass urine (without prior digital rectal examination (DRE)) was collected from men presenting with urinary symptoms (referred to exclude/confirm the presence of prostate cancer) and from 3 relevant control groups. EN2 protein was measured by ELISA in urine from men with PC (n=82) and controls (combined n=102). RESULTS EN2 expression was expressed and secreted by PC cell lines and PC tissue but not by normal prostate tissue or stroma. The presence of EN2 in urine was highly predictive of PC, with a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 88.2%, without requirement for DRE, with an overall AUC of 0.81. There was no correlation with PSA levels. These results we confirmed independently by a second academic centre in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS Urinary EN2 is a highly specific and sensitive candidate biomarker of prostate cancer. To date, the limitations of false positive PSA levels due to BPH have not been observed. No DRE was required unlike all other recently described markers, making it attractive as a screening tool in the future. No correlation with PSA was evident. A larger multicentre study to further evaluate the diagnostic potential of EN2 is justified. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e932-e933 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hardev Pandha Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Mohammed Ismail Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Angie Boxall Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Aagna Bhatt Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Stephen Langley Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Richard Hindley Basingstoke, United Kingdom More articles by this author Richard Morgan Guildford, United Kingdom More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract