Agenda Evaluation Research Articles

기후변화 시대 광역시 지방의제21 추진체계의 지속가능성 평가

In 1992, the United Nations reached a consensus about sustainable development to avert ecological crises such as climate change. Thereafter, the UN has strongly recommended ‘Local Agenda 21’ at the level of municipalities to solve global environmental problems. In this situation, Korea is regarded as a pioneer because it established the local agenda in advance of other countries. However, there have been few qualitative evaluations of a sustainable system for local agenda 21, while the sustainability of municipalities has been assessed quantitatively many times. In this context, this study attempted to qualitatively evaluate the sustainable scheme of local agenda 21 targeting the metropolitan cities in Korea. To accomplish the purpose, this study adopted an analytic framework consisting of three sectors: contents, procedure, and evaluation of agenda. The analysis result showed that Gwangju ranked first in sustainability, followed by Incheon, Ulsan, Daegu, Busan, and Daejeon. In conclusion, this study suggested policy implications to strengthen Korean sustainability nationally and locally.

DECONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF AGENDA 2030 AND LOCAL AGENDA 21 IN THE CONTEXT OF APPLIED ETHICS

DECONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF AGENDA 2030 AND LOCAL AGENDA 21 IN THE CONTEXT OF APPLIED ETHICS

Voting Decisions at US Mutual Funds: How Investors Really Use Proxy Advisers

Voting Decisions at US Mutual Funds: How Investors Really Use Proxy Advisers

Looking at Ourselves

During 1994, an external evaluation of Agenda was carried out by Debbie Budlender, on behalf of Agenda's primary funder, HIVOS. This summary of her extremely useful and insightful document highlights some crucial factors relating to the journal's future

View Point: Response to the Research Agenda Evaluation Model

View Point: Response to the Research Agenda Evaluation Model