MLR, I02.2, 2007 507 Given this approach, the analysis of individual texts tends to be underdeveloped. Even when a given dialogue or set of dialogues is singled out for special attention, themethodology adopted isoften a longway from close reading: thehelpfulness of a discussion of dialogue form in theCymbalum mundi, which does not contain a single citation from thework which is thepurported object of study, is curtailed from the outset. This is a shame, because more focused discussions of Pontus de Tyrard's dialogues, and of the role ofRonsard as a character within dialogues, contain insights towhich all specialists would wish to refer. Moreover, albeit that thedefinition ofboth genre and corpus is central tomuch of Eva Kushner's work, the result isnot always convincing. There is not a strong case for devoting two chapters to dialogue in an author who neverwrote one, namelyMontaigne, especially when amajor author who does incorporate dialogues intohis fiction,namely Rabelais, isvirtually ignored.This impression is compounded by the extraordinary claim thatPanurge's consultations in the Tiers Livre are all 'in the formof indirect discourse' (p. 25I), despite several being in dialogue form.There are also surprising omissions: there is littlemention of dialogues in the banquet tradition, and none at all ofGuillaume Bouchet's Les Serees, Cholieres's Matinees and Apresdisnees, nor,more seriously still, of Beroalde de Verville's Le Moyen de parvenir. Given these reservations, the usefulness of Le Dialogue a' la Renaissance is limited. Specialists will need to refer to it,but many aspects of analysis of thephenomenon could be more fullydeveloped. UNIVERSITY OF EXETER HUGH ROBERTS Conceptions ofEurope inRenaissance France. Ed. by DAVID COWLING. (Faux Titre, 28i) Amsterdam: Rodopi. 2006. 204 pp. ?40. ISBN 978-90-420-2006-I. The ten articles in thisFestschrift forKeith Cameron predominantly constitute the kind of scrupulous scholarship with a strong historical focuswith which he is readily associated. Most of the contributors range beyond the chosen theme, presumably because, as Jean Balsamo argues in the excellent essay which opens the volume, the concept ofEurope was not yet fullyformed during theRenaissance. He maintains that theprehistory of thenotion emerges both in theRepublic ofLetters, which was itself formed during theRenaissance, and in amilitary and aristocratic ideal. IanMorri son's reading of Rabelais follows a similar line: doubtless the strongest Rabelaisian conception ofEurope is found in theprologue to the Tiers Livre, which refers to the Franco-Imperial hostilities as a tragicomedy affecting the entire continent, revealing it to be an emergent political and cultural construct, as well as a geographical one. Terence Cave's work on 'pre-histoires' (in Pre-histoires: textes troublesau seuil de la modernite (Geneva: Droz, I999) and inPre-histoires, II:Langues etrangereset troubles economiques au XVIe siecle (Geneva: Droz, 2001)) would have provided a powerful method to accompany these analyses of theprehistory of the concept ofEurope. In deed, Yvonne Bellenger's highly detailed contribution on thehistory ofDu Bartas's La Lepanthe is letdown somewhat by a conclusion which projects our conception of Europe back onto theRenaissance. Similarly, Francoise Charpentier's analysis ofhow the themes of discovery and curiosity in theQuart Livre and the Cinquiesme Livre are constantly linked to a return to the familiar could have made the tension between these two trends, and its implication for the difficultyof a conception of Europe, more explicit. Furthermore, none of the contributors countenances the possibility of a notion of Europe founded on shared popular culture, which would be aworthy object of study.The European theme is implicit in theother contributions, although Frank Lestringant's analysis of 'livres de contrarietes' reveals that a conception of Europe inopposition to the supposedly barbaric ways of the Syrians was obvious to a 5o8 Reviews mid-seventeenth-century Jesuitmissionary. The contrast between differentcultures, and thedefinition in relation to the 'other'which ensues, isalso the theme ofMichael Heath's highly entertaining reading of French representations ofTurkish views of the French. Marie-Madeleine Fragonard's contribution concerns a fascinating case study ofAgrippa d'Aubigne's diplomatic relationswith England, revealing a failed attempt at a unified Protestant Europe. David Trotter's piece engages in similarly thorough historical scholarship, in this case ofmixed-language documents in thePyrenees. In differentways, these contributions show that national identitywas not itself fully...
Read full abstract