European Stroke Organisation Guidelines Research Articles

A direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) for acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy: Indications, technique, and emerging devices.

To date, the use of the most suitable first-pass technique for Mechanical Thrombectomy is still debated. In last years, several observational studies have suggested noninferiority or superiority of A Direct Aspiration first-Pass Technique (ADAPT) technique to achieve better reperfusion in comparison to stent retriever. While ASA/AHA 2018 guidelines recommend that patients with AIS should receive Mechanical Thrombectomy with a stent retriever, last European Stroke Organization guidelines report no evidence that stent retriever compared with contact aspiration could improve reperfusion rate. ADAPT is based on aspiration alone as the primary mechanism of thrombectomy and, if initially unsuccessful, then incorporating adjunctive alternatives. ADAPT improvement is also related to last generation of aspiration catheters. The purpose of this review is to report ADAPT principles, technique, efficacy, and safety as first-line treatment for acute ischemic stroke with the latest generation of reperfusion devices.

An Audit of Best Medical Therapy Adherence Among Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis Attending a Tertiary Stroke Centre

Abstract Background Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is estimated to cause 11-28% of ischaemic strokes annually. The primary objective of this audit was to assess current adherence to best medical therapy (BMT) to patients with CAS in a tertiary stroke centre. Our secondary aim was to assess stability, regression or progression of CAS whilst on BMT. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted in a tertiary stroke centre over a six-week period. Patients were included if they were aged over 18 years, presenting to an outpatient stroke clinic, and had a known diagnosis of either symptomatic or asymptomatic CAS. The European Stroke Organisation Guidelines were used to define BMT. Results A total of 56 charts were reviewed at three weekly outpatient clinics. Of the 27 patients meeting our inclusion criteria 66% (n=18) were male, median degree of CAS was 50-70% and 78% (n=20) had symptomatic CAS. 89% were on BMT but only 56% achieved a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <1.8 (median 1.6 (range: 0.7-4.2) and only 66% (n=18) had a documented smoking status. 81% of patients with symptomatic CAS on BMT had stable stenosis, 5% had regression and 14% had progression of stenosis. 50% of asymptomatic patients had progression of the degree of their stenosis. Conclusion Overall adherence to BMT was good at 89% but there is room for improvement particularly in terms of lipid target level and documentation of risk factor status. BMT resulted in stable stenosis and low progression rates particularly in patients with symptomatic CAS. BMT and early detection are essential for management to control progression of CAS, but we have highlighted the opportunity to improve LDL-C targets. Further research is needed to evaluate if the results of this study are translatable to the stroke population in general.

Impact of European Stroke Organisation secondary prevention guideline for ischaemic stroke / transient ischaemic attack

ObjectivesWe aimed to assess secondary prevention strategies after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Materials and MethodsWe investigated the impact of European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guideline recommendations for secondary prevention on recurrent events among people with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA. We assessed the following interventions by survival analysis or modelling impacts from clinical trial data: two blood pressure (BP) drugs compared to one drug; LDL-cholesterol target <1.8 mmol/L; and pioglitazone therapy. Outcomes were mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). ResultsWe included 4,037 people admitted between 01/12/2015 to 31/12/2018: mean (SD) age 68.6 (12.9) years; 1984 (49.1 %) female and median (IQR) follow-up 2.2 (1.5-3.1) years.Prescription of two BP drugs was associated with reduced mortality in our sample of 2238 people with hypertension (HR 0.64, 95 %CI 0.51-0.81; P<0.001).We estimate an LDL-cholesterol target <1.8 mmol/L could reduce MACE incidence from 128 to 114 events (95 %CI 103-127) in our sample of 1024 people with LDL-cholesterol 1.8 mmol/L who were not already prescribed intensive lipid-lowering therapy over median (IQR) 2.2 (1.5-2.9) years follow-up (ARR 1.38 %, NNT 73).We estimate pioglitazone therapy could reduce incidence of recurrent stroke or MI from 192 to 169 events (95 %CI 156-185) in our sample of 1587 people with diabetes or insulin resistance over median (IQR) 2.4 (1.7-3.2) years follow-up (ARR 1.45 %, NNT 69). ConclusionsWe estimate that implementing ESO guidelines in a Scottish population after ischaemic stroke or TIA would reduce mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events.

Comparison of American and European Guideline Recommendations for Diagnostic Workup and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack.

Guidelines help to facilitate treatment decisions based on available evidence, and also to provide recommendations in areas of uncertainty. In this paper, we compare the recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack of the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association (ASA) with the European Stroke Organization (ESO) guidelines. The primary aim of this paper is to offer clinicians guidance by identifying areas where there is consensus and where consensus is lacking, in the absence or presence of high-level evidence. We compared AHA/ASA with the ESO guideline recommendations for 7 different topics related to diagnostic stroke workup and secondary prevention. We categorized the recommendations based on class and level of evidence to determine whether there were relevant differences in the ratings of evidence that the guidelines used for its recommendations. Finally, we summarized major topics of agreement and disagreement, while also prominent knowledge gaps were identified. In total, we found 63 ESO and 82 AHA/ASA recommendations, of which 38 were on the same subject. Most recommendations are largely similar, but not all are based on high-level evidence. For many recommendations, AHA/ASA and ESO assigned different levels of evidence. For the 10 recommendations with Level A evidence (high quality) in AHA/ASA, ESO only labeled 4 of these as high quality. There are many remaining issues with either no or insufficient evidence, and some topics that are not covered by both guidelines. Most ESO and AHA/ASA Guideline recommendations for stroke workup and secondary prevention were similar. However not all were based on high-level evidence and the appointed level of evidence often differed. Clinicians should not blindly follow all guideline recommendations; the accompanying level of evidence informs which recommendations are based on robust evidence. Topics with lower levels of evidence, or those with recommendations that disagree or are missing, may be an incentive for further clinical research.

Recommendations for Upper Limb Motor Recovery: An Overview of the UK and European Rehabilitation after Stroke Guidelines (2023).

Upper limb impairment is common after stroke, with a significant impact on the stroke survivor's function, social participation and quality of life. Clinical guidelines are needed to inform clinical practise, tailor interventions to improve outcomes and address unresolved research questions. This review contributes to the evidence guiding clinical practise for upper limb motor recovery after stroke by summarising the recommendations from the UK rehabilitation guidelines (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (ISWP)) and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines, all published in 2023. All three guidelines target researchers, clinical practitioners, stroke survivors and their social networks. An important feature in all three guidelines was therapeutic intensity, with all guidelines recommending increased therapeutic intensity. Unlike the ESO, the NICE and ISWP additionally include specific research recommendations. While the NICE guidelines seem more holistic and target a wider audience, the three guidelines are complimentary. We recommend that a future consensus statement should be developed in partnership between all three organisations, agreeing on scope and using the same terminology, on recommendations to improve stroke rehabilitation in the UK and Europe.

Survey-Based Assessment of the Quality of Reporting Guidelines of Carotid Artery Stenosis

No evaluation of the quality of different carotid guidelines using validated scales has been performed to date. The present study aims to analyze 3 carotid stenosis guidelines, apprizing their quality and reporting using validated tools. A survey-based assessment of the quality of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023, European Stroke Organisation (ESO) 2021, and the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) 2021 carotid stenosis guidelines, was performed by 43 vascular surgeons, cardiologists, neurologist or interventional radiologists using 2 validated appraisal tools for quality and reporting guidelines, the AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT statement. Using the AGREE II tool, the ESVS, SVS, and ESO guidelines had overall quality scores of 87.3%, 79.4%, and 82.9%, respectively (P=0.001) The ESVS and ESO had better scores in the scope and purpose domain, and the SVS in the clarity of presentation domain. In the RIGHT statement, the ESVS, SVS, and ESO guidelines had overall quality scores of 84.0.7%, 74.3%, and 79.0%, respectively (P=0.001). All 3 guidelines stood out for their methodology for search of evidence and formulating evidence-based recommendations. On the contrary, were negatively evaluated mostly in the cost and resource implications in formulating the recommendations. The 2023 ESVS carotid stenosis guideline was the best evaluated among the 3 guidelines, with scores over 5% higher than the other 2 guidelines. Efforts should be made by guideline writing committees to take the AGREE II and RIGHT statements into account in the development of future guidelines to produce high-quality recommendations.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after stroke.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Potential stroke mechanisms include paradoxical embolism from a venous clot which traverses the PFO, in situ clot formation within the PFO, and atrial arrhythmias due to electrical signalling disruption. The purpose of this guideline is to provide recommendations for diagnosing, treating, and long-term managing patients with ischaemic stroke and PFO. Conversely, Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) was not considered an index event in this context because only one RCT involved TIA patients. However, this subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between TIA and stroke outcomes. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guideline development. This document underwent peer-review by independent experts and members of the ESO Guideline Board and Executive Committee. The working group acknowledges the current evidentiary gap in delineating an unequivocal diagnostic algorithm for the detection of PFO. Although transoesophageal echocardiography is conventionally held as the most accurate diagnostic tool for PFO identification, its status as the 'gold standard' remains unsubstantiated by rigorously validated evidence. We found high-quality evidence to recommend PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy in selected patients aged 18-60 years in whom no other evident cause of stroke is found but a PFO (i.e. PFO-associated stroke). The PASCAL classification system can be used to select such candidates for PFO closure. Patients with both a large right-to-left shunt and an atrial septal aneurysm benefit most from PFO closure. There is insufficient evidence to make an evidence-based recommendation on PFO closure in patients older than 60 and younger than 18 years. We found low quality evidence to suggest against PFO closure in patients with unlikely PFO-related stroke according to the PASCAL classification, except in specific scenarios (Expert Consensus). We suggest against long-term anticoagulation in patients with PFO-associated stroke unless anticoagulation is indicated for other medical reasons. Regarding the long-term AF monitoring after PFO closure, the working group concluded that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the risks and benefits associated with the use of long-term cardiac monitoring, such as implantable loop recorders. This document provides additional guidance, in the form of evidence-based recommendations or expert consensus statements, on diagnostic methods for PFO detection, and medical management after PFO closure.

Short-lasting tentorial herniation may cause cortical blindness. A case report and systematic literature review

Cortical blindness occurs with bilateral damage to the visual cortex. It can be caused by various reasons, including the posterior cerebral arteries stroke due to the tentorial herniation. A case of a 40-year-old patient with a large right-sided sphenoidal meningioma. A systematic review on the problem of cortical blindness after tentorial herniation according to the PRISMA guideline. Subtotal removal of dense meningioma. At night after the operation, there was an acute headache, then a coma. Immediately dehydration therapy, tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation. CT scan showed a small hemorrhage in the tumor bed and subarachnoid space, brain edema and dislocation. After 53 minutes, ventricular drainage was installed, intracranial pressure was normal and ranged from 6 to 14 mmHg. After sedation withdrawal, cortical blindness was detected, which did not regress for 1.5 years. There are no other neurological symptoms, the patient walks, serves herself. Radiation therapy in a total of 54 Gy for the remainder of the grade 1 meningioma ensured tumor control. The time window for restoration of the cerebral blood flow, according to the European Stroke Organization guidelines, is 4.5 hours. In this case, compression of the posterior cerebral arteries lasted less than 53 minutes, however, irreversible ischemia developed in their territory; the outcome on the modified Rankine scale was 4 points. Similar cases are not described in the literature. Patients should be warned about even the non-obvious risks of neurosurgical intervention, since even timely measures taken do not always avoid complications.

Acute ischemic stroke and measurement of apixaban and rivaroxaban: an observational cohort implementation study

BackgroundTreatment with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is contraindicated with intake of apixaban/rivaroxaban in the last 48 hours. Recent European Stroke Organization guidelines suggest that thrombolysis can be considered if anti-factor Xa activity (AFXa) is <0.5 × 103 IU/L with low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) calibrated assays. Some centers also use apixaban/rivaroxaban-calibrated AFXa assays to identify patients with low drug concentrations. ObjectivesTo prospectively evaluate the first year of implementation of drug-calibrated AFXa assays at our center with 2500 yearly admittances with suspected stroke. MethodsSamples were analyzed on Sysmex CS-5100 instruments with Innovance anti-Xa reagents. Thrombolysis could be considered with drug concentrations <25 μg/L. Patients were registered in an institutionally approved quality register. Outcomes included (1) the number of patients receiving thrombolysis after drug measurement, (2) turn-around time for drug concentration measurements, and (3) sensitivity of LMWH/UFH AFXa to apixaban and rivaroxaban. ResultsApixaban or rivaroxaban was measured in 148 samples, and 4 patients who previously would have been ineligible for thrombolysis were treated with thrombolysis. In total, thrombolysis was administered in 123 patient episodes in the study period. The median turn-around time for the drug measurements was 38 minutes. Apixaban concentrations of 25 μg/L and 50 μg/L corresponded to LMWH/UFH AFXa of 0.13 and 0.27 × 103 IU/L, respectively. There were too few rivaroxaban results for regression analysis. ConclusionImplementation of apixaban and rivaroxaban measurements led to a small increase in the number of patients receiving thrombolysis. Excluding significant concentrations of apixaban or rivaroxaban using LMWH/UFH AFXa may be feasible.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on Moyamoya angiopathy Endorsed by Vascular European Reference Network (VASCERN).

The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on Moyamoya Angiopathy (MMA), developed according to ESO standard operating procedure and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, were compiled to assist clinicians in managing patients with MMA in their decision making. A working group involving neurologists, neurosurgeons, a geneticist and methodologists identified nine relevant clinical questions, performed systematic literature reviews and, whenever possible, meta-analyses. Quality assessment of the available evidence was made with specific recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence to provide recommendations, Expert Consensus Statements were formulated. Based on low quality evidence from one RCT, we recommend direct bypass surgery in adult patients with haemorrhagic presentation. For ischaemic adult patients and children, we suggest revascularization surgery using direct or combined technique rather than indirect, in the presence of haemodynamic impairment and with an interval of 6-12 weeks between the last cerebrovascular event and surgery. In the absence of robust trial, an Expert Consensus was reached recommending long-term antiplatelet therapy in non-haemorrhagic MMA, as it may reduce risk of embolic stroke. We also agreed on the utility of performing pre- and post- operative haemodynamic and posterior cerebral artery assessment. There were insufficient data to recommend systematic variant screening of RNF213 p.R4810K. Additionally, we suggest that long-term MMA neuroimaging follow up may guide therapeutic decision making by assessing the disease progression. We believe that this guideline, which is the first comprehensive European guideline on MMA management using GRADE methods will assist clinicians to choose the most effective management strategy for MMA.

14-day Holter monitoring for atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: The yield of guideline-recommended monitoring duration.

Current European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines recommend >48 h of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation (AF) in all patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) with undetermined origin. We assessed the yield of the guideline-recommended monitoring for AF, as well as of extending monitoring up to 14 days. We included consecutive patients with stroke/TIA without AF in an academic hospital in The Netherlands. We reported AF incidence and number needed to screen (NNS) in the overall sample after 48 h and 14 days of Holter monitoring. Among 379 patients with median age 63 years (IQR 55-73), 58% male, Holter monitoring detected 10 cases of incident AF during a median of 13 (IQR 12-14) days of monitoring. Seven AF cases were detected within the first 48 hours (incidence 1.85%, 95% CI 0.74-3.81; NNS 54), and three additional AF cases were recorded among the 362 patients with >48 h of monitoring and without AF ⩽ 48 h (incidence 0.83%, 95% CI: 0.17-2.42; NNS 121). All AF cases were detected within the first 7 days of monitoring. Our sample was subject to sampling bias favoring inclusion of participants with low AF risk. Strengths of this work were the broad inclusion criteria as recommended by ESO guidelines, and high Holter adherence among participants. The analysis was limited by inclusion of lower-risk cases and a relatively small sample size. In low-risk patients with recent stroke or TIA, ESO guideline-recommended screening for AF resulted in a low AF yield, with limited additional value of monitoring up to 14 days. Our results underline the need for a personalized approach in determining a patient's optimum duration for post-stroke non-invasive ambulatory monitoring.

European Stroke Organisation guidelines on treatment of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation guideline is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendations on the management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the European Stroke Organisation guidelines and according to GRADE methodology. ICAD represents a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, and patients affected by this condition are exposed to a high risk for future strokes and other major cardiovascular events, despite best medical therapy available. We identified 11 relevant clinical problems affecting ICAD patients and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions. The first two questions refer to the asymptomatic stage of the disease, which is being increasingly detected thanks to the routine use of noninvasive vascular imaging. We were not able to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal detection strategy and management of asymptomatic ICAD, and further research in the field is encouraged as subclinical ICAD may represent a big opportunity to improve primary stroke prevention. The second block of PICOs (3-5) is dedicated to the management of acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke caused by ICAD, a clinical presentation of this disease that is becoming increasingly relevant and problematic, since it is associated with more refractory endovascular reperfusion procedures. An operational definition of probable ICAD-related LVO is proposed in the guideline. Despite the challenging context, no dedicated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified, and therefore the guideline can only provide with suggestions derived from observational studies and our expert consensus, such as the escalated use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors and angioplasty/stenting in cases of refractory thrombectomies due to underlying ICAD. The last block of PICOs is devoted to the secondary prevention of patients with symptomatic ICAD. Moderate-level evidence was found to recommend against the use of oral anticoagulation as preferred antithrombotic drug, in favor of antiplatelets. Low-level evidence based our recommendation in favor of double antiplatelet as the antithrombotic treatment of choice in symptomatic ICAD patients, which we suggest to maintain during 90 days as per our expert consensus. Endovascular therapy with intracranial angioplasty and or stenting is not recommended as a treatment of first choice in high-grade symptomatic ICAD (moderate-level evidence). Regarding neurosurgical interventions, the available evidence does not support their use as front line therapies in patients with high-grade ICAD. There is not enough evidence as to provide any specific recommendation regarding the use of remote ischemic conditioning in ICAD patients, and further RCTs are needed to shed light on the utility of this promising therapy. Finally, we dedicate the last PICO to the importance of aggressive vascular risk factor management in ICAD, although the evidence derived from RCTs specifically addressing this question is still scarce.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) occur in around 3% of the population. Important management questions concern if and how to perform preventive UIA occlusion; if, how and when to perform follow up imaging and non-interventional means to reduce the risk of rupture. Using the Standard Operational Procedure of ESO we prepared guidelines according to GRADE methodology. Since no completed randomised trials exist, we used interim analyses of trials, and meta-analyses of observational and case-control studies to provide recommendations to guide UIA management. All recommendations were based on very low evidence. We suggest preventive occlusion if the estimated 5-year rupture risk exceeds the risk of preventive treatment. In general, we cannot recommend endovascular over microsurgical treatment, but suggest flow diverting stents as option only when there are no other low-risk options for UIA repair. To detect UIA recurrence we suggest radiological follow up after occlusion. In patients who are initially observed, we suggest radiological monitoring to detect future UIA growth, smoking cessation, treatment of hypertension, but not treatment with statins or acetylsalicylic acid with the indication to reduce the risk of aneurysm rupture. Additionally, we formulated 15 expert-consensus statements. All experts suggest to assess UIA patients within a multidisciplinary setting (neurosurgery, neuroradiology and neurology) at centres consulting >100 UIA patients per year, to use a shared decision-making process based on the team recommendation and patient preferences, and to repair UIA only in centres performing the proposed treatment in >30 patients with (ruptured or unruptured) aneurysms per year per neurosurgeon or neurointerventionalist. These UIA guidelines provide contemporary recommendations and consensus statement on important aspects of UIA management until more robust data come available.

European Stroke Organisation guidelines on stroke in women: Management of menopause, pregnancy and postpartum.

Pregnancy, postpartum and menopause are regarded as periods women are more vulnerable to ischaemic events. There are conflicting results regarding stroke risk and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) during menopause. Stroke in pregnancy is generally increasing with serious consequences for mother and child; therefore, recommendations for acute treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are needed. The aim of this guideline is to support and guide clinicians in treatment decisions in stroke in women. Following the “Grading of Recommendations and Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)” approach, the guidelines were developed according to the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Standard Operating Procedure. Systematic reviews and metanalyses were performed. Based on available evidence, recommendations were provided. Where there was a lack of evidence, an expert consensus statement was given. Low quality of evidence was found to suggest against the use of HRT to reduce the risk of stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic) in postmenopausal women. No data was available on the outcome of women with stroke when treated with HRT. No sufficient evidence was found to provide recommendations for treatment with IVT or MT during pregnancy, postpartum and menstruation. The majority of members suggested that pregnant women can be treated with IVT after assessing the benefit/risk profile on an individual basis, all members suggested treatment with IVT during postpartum and menstruation. All members suggested treatment with MT during pregnancy. The guidelines highlight the need to identify evidence for stroke prevention and acute treatment in women in more vulnerable periods of their lifetime to generate reliable data for future guidelines.

Methodological assessment of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cerebral vasospasm using the AGREE-II tool.

Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm is the most common cause of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Despite the recent advances in its early detection, diagnosis, and proper treatment, the outcome of patients experiencing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains poor. It is well known that cerebral vasospasm is the most troublesome complication of aSAH, while delayed cerebral ischemia related to cerebral vasospasm constitutes the major cause of unfavorable outcomes in patients with aSAH. The need for evidence-based guidelines is of great importance for the prevention, early detection, and efficient management of aSAH-induced vasospasm. Moreover, guidelines provide young physicians with a valuable tool for practicing defensible medicine. However, the methodology, clinical applicability, reporting clarity, and biases of guidelines must be periodically assessed. In this study, the authors sought to assess the reporting clarity and methodological quality of published guidelines and recommendations. A search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The search terms used were "clinical practice guidelines," "recommendations," "stroke," "subarachnoid hemorrhage," and "vasospasm" in all possible combinations. The search period extended from 1964 to September 2021 and was limited to literature published in the English language. All published guidelines and recommendations reporting on the diagnosis and management of vasospasm were included. Studies other than those reporting guidelines and recommendations were excluded. The eligible studies were evaluated by three blinded raters, employing the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE-II) analysis tool. A total of 10 sets of guidelines were evaluated in this study. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association issued guidelines found to have the highest methodological quality and reporting clarity, followed by the European Stroke Organization guidelines and the English edition of the Japanese guidelines issued by the Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke. The interrater agreement was moderate in the current analysis. These findings support the idea that improvement of currently existing guidelines is feasible in the following domains: the rigor of guidelines and recommendations development, clinical applicability, editorial independence, and stakeholder involvement. Furthermore, periodic updating of published guidelines requires improvement in the future.

The effects of ultra-early clipping on survival and neurological outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

European Stroke Organisation guidelines advise treating aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) as early as possible. However, the optimum timing along with its beneficial effects is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of ultra-early clipping on neurological outcomes and survival in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhages. This retrospective study included all poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients treated by ultra-early surgical clipping at Trakya University Hospital between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020. We analysed the outcome and mortality data of these patients. Specifically, we evaluated the effects of ultra-early clipping on outcomes, defined as within six hours of the onset of symptoms. From 813 records, 212 met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 117 (55.2%) were female and 95 (44.8%) male. The mean age was 58.3 ± 13.7 years. Glasgow Outcome Scale scores differed significantly between age groups, subarachnoid haemorrhage grades, those who did and did not rebleed, and those who did or did not suffer from vasospasms. A beneficiary relationship was found between ultra-early clipping and mortality among patients. Furthermore, favourable outcomes were significantly more frequent in the ultra-early clipping group. The aSAH patients treated at our hospital who received ultra-early clipping had significantly lower mortality rates and more favourable outcomes. The difference was significant among those treated during the last decade and among patients younger than 50.

Insights into a personalized management of blood pressure in acute stroke.

Blood pressure management in acute stroke has long been a matter of debate. Epidemiological data show that high blood pressure is associated with death, disability and early stroke recurrence, whereas the pathophysiological rationale for ensuring elevated blood pressure in order maintain adequate cerebral perfusion remains a pertinent argument, especially in ischaemic stroke. The European Stroke Organisation Guidelines on blood pressure management in acute ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage provide recommendations for the appropriate management of blood pressure in various clinical acute stroke settings. In this narrative review, we provide specific updates on blood pressure management in ICH, blood pressure management in the setting of reperfusion therapies for ischaemic stroke, and the evidence for the use of induced hypertension in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in the light of the recent guidelines.

ESO guideline for the management of extracranial and intracranial artery dissection.

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation guideline is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendations on the management of extracranial artery dissection (EAD) and intracranial artery dissection (IAD). EAD and IAD represent leading causes of stroke in the young, but are uncommon in the general population, thus making it challenging to conduct clinical trials and large observational studies. The guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure for European Stroke Organisation guidelines and according to GRADE methodology. Our four recommendations result from a thorough analysis of the literature comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticoagulants to antiplatelets in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and twenty-six comparative observational studies. In EAD patients with acute ischemic stroke, we recommend using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase within 4.5 hours of onset if standard inclusion/exclusion criteria are met, and mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation. We further recommend early endovascular or surgical intervention for IAD patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Based on evidence from two phase 2 RCTs that have shown no difference between the benefits and risks of anticoagulants versus antiplatelets in the acute phase of symptomatic EAD, we strongly recommend that clinicians can prescribe either option. In post-acute EAD patients with residual stenosis or dissecting aneurysms and in symptomatic IAD patients with an intracranial dissecting aneurysm and isolated headache, there is insufficient data to provide a recommendation on the benefits and risks of endovascular/surgical treatment. Finally, nine expert consensus statements, adopted by 8 to 11 of the 11 experts involved, propose guidance for clinicians when the quality of evidence was too low to provide recommendations. Some of these pertain to the management of IAD (use of IVT, endovascular treatment, and antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in IAD with ischemic stroke and use of endovascular or surgical interventions for IAD with headache only). Other expert consensus statements address the use of direct anticoagulants and dual antiplatelet therapy in EAD-related cerebral ischemia, endovascular treatment of the EAD/IAD lesion, and multidisciplinary assessment of the best therapeutic approaches in specific situations.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for the preparation and publishing of guidelines.

The first European Stroke Organization (ESO) standard operating procedure (SOP) published in 2015 aimed at the implementation the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to provide evidence-based guidelines for stroke management. This second ESO-SOP is aiming at further increase of the practicability of ESO guidelines and its technical implications. Authors comprised of the members of the ESO guideline Board and ESO Executive Committee. The final document was agreed on by several internal reviews. The second SOP comprises of the following aspects: rational for the SOP, the introduction of expert consensus statements, types of guideline documents, structures involved and detailed description of the guideline preparation process, handling of financial and intellectual conflicts of interest (CoI), involvement of ESO members in the guideline process, review process, authorship and publication policy, updating of guidelines, cooperation with other societies, and dealing with falsified data. This second SOP supersedes the first SOP published in 2015.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on blood pressure management in acute ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage.

The optimal blood pressure (BP) management in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) remains controversial. These European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist physicians in their clinical decisions regarding BP management in acute stroke.The guidelines were developed according to the ESO standard operating procedure and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided where insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. Despite several large randomised-controlled clinical trials, quality of evidence is generally low due to inconsistent results of the effect of blood pressure lowering in AIS. We recommend early and modest blood pressure control (avoiding blood pressure levels >180/105 mm Hg) in AIS patients undergoing reperfusion therapies. There is more high-quality randomised evidence for BP lowering in acute ICH, where intensive blood pressure lowering is recommended rapidly after hospital presentation with the intent to improve recovery by reducing haematoma expansion. These guidelines provide further recommendations on blood pressure thresholds and for specific patient subgroups.There is ongoing uncertainty regarding the most appropriate blood pressure management in AIS and ICH. Future randomised-controlled clinical trials are needed to inform decision making on thresholds, timing and strategy of blood pressure lowering in different acute stroke patient subgroups.