European Society For Vascular Surgery Research Articles

Exercise Therapy for Chronic Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: AClinical Consensus Document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in Collaboration With the European Society of Vascular Medicine and the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

All guidelines worldwide strongly recommend exercise as a pillar in the management of patients affected by lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD). Exercise therapy in this setting presents different modalities, and a structured programme provides optimal results. This clinical consensus paper is intended to promote and assist the set up of comprehensive exercise programmes and best advice for patients with symptomatic chronic PAD. Different exercise training protocols specific for patients with PAD are presented. Data on patient assessment and outcome measures are described based on the current best evidence. The document ends by highlighting supervised exercise programme access disparities across Europe and the evidence gaps requiring further research.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

ObjectiveThe European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. MethodsThe guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. ResultsA total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. ConclusionThe ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Asymptomatic Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Asymptomatic Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication

The troubled course of the CHIVA Cure through clinical studies: a critical review

The treatment of Superficial Venous Insufficiency (SVI) encompasses a wide and disparate array of techniques, ranging from destructive procedures (endovascular ablation, stripping and sclerotherapy) to the conservative hemodynamic procedure (CHIVA). This variety of options betrays a wide degree of uncertainty on the recommended treatment, mainly due to technical biases in performing the CHIVA Cure that heavily affect the results from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). In fact, the authors of the last Cochrane Review (CR) on the CHIVA Cure disowned its superiority based on the results from five RCTs in which more than 200 of the overall 419 participants allocated to the CHIVA arm had actually received treatments other than the CHIVA Cure. Further, the Guidelines (GLs) from both the American and the European Society for Vascular Surgery recommend the CHIVA Cure only to vascular surgeons experienced with this technique, contradicting what is expected of a specialist, i.e. mastery of the treatment of diseases in his or her specialty. Finally, CRs and GLs do not take into any account the ethically relevant issue that destructive procedures, recommended for vascular surgeons not experienced in the CHIVA Cure, will fatally deprive the patient of the Great Saphenous Vein (GSV), which is the first-choice infra-inguinal graft for the treatment of severe peripheral artery disease and to ward off the severely disabling condition resulting from limb loss, when angioplasty/stenting is not feasible. In this paper we review and discuss the RCTs, CRs, and GLs concerning the CHIVA Cure available at June 2023 on Medline and Cochrane Central databases.

Editor's Choice – The Intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS Guidelines on Peripheral Artery Disease in People With Diabetes Mellitus and a Foot Ulcer

AbstractDiabetes related foot complications have become a major cause of morbidity and are implicated in most major and minor amputations globally. Approximately 50% of people with diabetes and a foot ulcer have peripheral artery disease (PAD) and the presence of PAD significantly increases the risk of adverse limb and cardiovascular events.The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence based guidelines on the management and prevention of diabetes related foot complications since 1999. This guideline is an update of the 2019 IWGDF guideline on the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer. For this updated guideline, the IWGDF, the European Society for Vascular Surgery, and the Society for Vascular Surgery decided to collaborate to develop a consistent suite of recommendations relevant to clinicians in all countries.This guideline is based on three new systematic reviews. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework clinically relevant questions were formulated, and the literature was systematically reviewed. After assessing the certainty of the evidence, recommendations were formulated which were weighed against the balance of benefits and harms, patient values, feasibility, acceptability, equity, resources required, and when available, costs.Through this process five recommendations were developed for diagnosing PAD in a person with diabetes, with and without a foot ulcer or gangrene. Five recommendations were developed for prognosis relating to estimating likelihood of healing and amputation outcomes in a person with diabetes and a foot ulcer or gangrene. Fifteen recommendations were developed related to PAD treatment encompassing prioritisation of people for revascularisation, the choice of a procedure and post-surgical care. In addition, the Writing Committee has highlighted key research questions where current evidence is lacking.The Writing Committee believes that following these recommendations will help healthcare professionals to provide better care and will reduce the burden of diabetes related foot complications.

The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer.

Diabetes related foot complications have become a major cause of morbidity and are implicated in most major and minor amputations globally. Approximately 50% of people with diabetes and a foot ulcer have peripheral artery disease (PAD) and the presence of PAD significantly increases the risk of adverse limb and cardiovascular events. The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence based guidelines on the management and prevention of diabetes related foot complications since 1999. This guideline is an update of the 2019 IWGDF guideline on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes mellitus and a foot ulcer. For this guideline the IWGDF, the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society for Vascular Surgery decided to collaborate to develop a consistent suite of recommendations relevant to clinicians in all countries. This guideline is based on three new systematic reviews. Using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework clinically relevant questions were formulated, and the literature was systematically reviewed. After assessing the certainty of the evidence, recommendations were formulated which were weighed against the balance of benefits and harms, patient values, feasibility, acceptability, equity, resources required, and when available, costs. Through this process five recommendations were developed for diagnosing PAD in a person with diabetes, with and without a foot ulcer or gangrene. Five recommendations were developed for prognosis relating to estimating likelihood of healing and amputation outcomes in a person with diabetes and a foot ulcer or gangrene. Fifteen recommendations were developed related to PAD treatment encompassing prioritisation of people for revascularisation, the choice of a procedure and post-surgical care. In addition, the Writing Committee has highlighted key research questions where current evidence is lacking. The Writing Committee believes that following these recommendations will help healthcare professionals to provide better care and will reduce the burden of diabetes related foot complications.

Principles of pharmacological therapy of comorbid diseases in patients with orthopedic pathology

Comorbidity is one of the leading problems in clinical practice. Interaction of diseases, involutive processes of natural aging and pathomorphosis of drugs significantly change clinical picture and course of the disease, the nature and severity of complications, limit or complicate the treatment and diagnostic process. Objective. To analyze current information on available recommendations for the treatment of comorbid diseases in patients with orthopedic pathology. Materials. An overview of the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, European Society of Hypertension, European Society for Vascular Surgery, Ukrainian Gastroenterological Association and American Diabetes Association for the period 2017–2019 is presented. Results. The first stage in the treatment of arterial hypertension is the lifestyle optimization, and the initial therapy of most patients with hypertension should be a combination of two drugs. Management of patients with lower extremity artery disease is associated with an increased risk of any cardiovascular events. Therefore, preventive measures are of particular importance. Gastropathies induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widespread in orthopedic practice. In the prevention of their occurrence, a well-chosen gastroprotective therapy is important. Once the diagnosis of diabetes is made, lifestyle modification should be started immediately along with the start of pharmacotherapy. Metformin remains the first-line drug for treatment, drugs of other groups can be prescribed when there are contraindications to metformin. In the treatment of neuropathic pain in diabetes or pre-diabetes, only pharmacological treatment strategies are effective. Conclusions. In most cases, a number of comorbidities with timely diagnosis and compliance with the algorithms of medical care can be corrected and treated. Properly selected conservative therapy can reduce the risk of peri- and postoperative complications.

Conflicting European and North American Society Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Volume Guidelines Differentially Discriminate Peri-operative Mortality After Elective Open AAA Repair

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines endorse a minimum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair volume of 20 open (OAR) and or endovascular (EVAR) AAA repair procedures per year as a proxy for high quality care. In contrast, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) espouses 10 exclusively OARs per year. Given the differences in these volume standards and definitions, debate persists regarding surgeon credentialing and healthcare resource allocation. This analysis aimed to determine which society endorsed volume benchmark better discriminates OAR mortality. A retrospective national registry based cohort analysis. Patients undergoing elective OAR were compared between centres meeting either ESVS (≥ 20 AAA procedures/year) or SVS (≥ 10 OARs/year) volume thresholds within the Vascular Quality Initiative (2010 - 2020). The primary outcome was in hospital death. Logistic regression was used for risk adjusted comparisons. A total of 8 761 OARs were performed at 193 US centres, and the median (IQR) volume was 6.6 (3.3, 9.9) OARs/year. When applying the SVS centre volume definition, the proportion of centres meeting ESVS and SVS minimum case thresholds was 12% (n= 22) and 25% (n= 48), respectively. The absolute mortality difference was 0.3% between centres performing ≥ 20 vs. ≥ 10 OARs/year (2.6% vs. 2.9%; p= .51). There was an incremental association between OAR volume and crude mortality rate; however, this absolute difference between lower and higher thresholds was only 0.2%/procedure (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 - 0.99; p < .001). Moreover, no difference in risk adjusted mortality was detected between volume standards (≥ 10 vs. ≥ 20; p= .78). In sub-analysis, the ESVS ≥ 20 total composite AAA repair volume threshold was not associated with mortality (p= .17); however, increasing the proportion of OAR cases making up the total annual AAA centre volume inversely correlated with mortality (p= .008). It appears that the SVS endorsed AAA centre volume threshold using exclusively OAR had a modest ability to discriminate peri-operative mortality outcomes and was superior to the current composite ESVS volume guideline in differentiating centre performance. These findings raise questions regarding the clinical validity of using EVAR as a volume proxy for OAR.

A Summary of European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs: Japanese Translation by Japanese Society of Phlebology and Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery

A Summary of European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs: Japanese Translation by Japanese Society of Phlebology and Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery in Europe

This study explored the status and availability of simulation based education (SBE) for learning vascular surgical procedures identified in the 2019 General Needs Assessment in vascular surgery in Europe (GNA-2019) and identified facilitators and barriers to SBE implementation in vascular surgery. A three round iterative survey was distributed via the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes. Members from leading committees and organisations within the European vascular surgical community were invited to participate as key opinion leaders (KOLs). Three online survey rounds explored demographics, SBE availability, and facilitators and barriers to SBE implementation. Overall, 147 KOLs (target population 338) accepted invitation to round 1, representing 30 European countries. The dropout rates for rounds 2 and 3 were 29% and 40%, respectively. Most respondents (88%) were senior, consultant level or higher. No mandatory SBE training was required in their department before training on patients, according to 84% of the KOLs. There was high consensus on the need for structured SBE (87%) and mandatory SBE (81%). SBE is available for the top three prioritised procedures in GNA-2019 (basic open skills, basic endovascular skills, and vascular imaging interpretation) in 24, 23, and 20 of the 30 represented European countries, respectively. The highest ranking facilitators were structured SBE programmes, availability of simulation equipment locally and regionally, good quality simulators, and having a dedicated person running the SBE. The highest ranked barriers were lack of structured SBE curriculum, equipment costs, lack of SBE culture, no or limited dedicated time for faculty to teach in SBE, and clinical work overload. Based largely on the opinions of KOLs in vascular surgery in Europe, this study revealed that SBE is needed in vascular surgery training and that systematic and structured programmes are required to ensure successful implementation.

Editor's Choice – Quality Assessment of European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines

An increasing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have emerged over recent years. To have clinical utility, they need to be rigorously developed and scientifically robust. Instruments have been developed to assess the quality of clinical guideline development and reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate CPGs from the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. CPGs published by the ESVS during the period January 2011 to January 2023 were included. Two independent reviewers assessed the guidelines after receiving training in the use and application of the AGREE II instrument. Inter-reviewer reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Maximum scaled scores were 100. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics v.26. Sixteen guidelines were included in the study. Good inter-reviewer score reliability was found on statistical analysis (> 0.9). The mean ± standard deviation domain scores were 68.1 ± 20.3% for scope and purpose, 57.1 ± 21.1% for stakeholder involvement, 67.8 ± 19.5% for rigour of development, 78.1 ± 20.6% for clarity of presentation, 50.3 ± 15.4% for applicability, 77.6 ± 17.6% for editorial independence, and 69.8 ± 20.1% for overall quality. Stakeholder involvement and applicability have improved in quality over time but are still the lowest scoring domains. Most ESVS clinical guidelines are of high quality and reporting. There is scope for improvement, specifically by addressing the domains of stakeholder involvement and clinical applicability.

Your New Year’s “resolution”—check your “screen!”

Your New Year’s “resolution”—check your “screen!”

Optimising Secondary Prevention: a One Year Review of Lipid Lowering Therapy (LLT) and Cholesterol Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Carotid Surgery

Objective: Stroke is common (100 000 new cases annually in the UK), with carotid atherosclerotic disease a recognised cause.1 In such cases patients may require either surgical or endovascular carotid intervention but they should also receive optimal medical therapy including lipid lowering therapy (LLT).2 Statins have been shown to reduce the 10 year risk of stroke/death (17.9% vs. 7.6%) after carotid endarterectomy.3 Current European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Guidelines advise high intensity statin (HIS) treatment with a target LDL C level of < 1.8 mmol/L.2 This study aims to explores trends in titration of lipid lowering therapy and LDL C levels in patients undergoing carotid intervention prior to, at the time of, and one year following carotid intervention.

Focused Update on Patients Treated with the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System from the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Practice Guidelines

Focused Update on Patients Treated with the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System from the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Practice Guidelines

RETRACTED: Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines on venous outflow Obstruction of the femoral-iliocaval veins

BackgroundThe overall goal of this report is to provide a high-level, practical approach to managing venous outflow obstruction (VOO) in Australia and New Zealand. MethodsA group of vascular surgeons from the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery with specific interest, training, and experience in the management of VOO were surveyed to assess current local practice. The results were analyzed and areas of disagreement identified. Following this, the group performed a literature review of consensus guidelines published by leading international organizations focused on the management of chronic venous disease, namely the Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, European Society for Vascular Surgery, American Vein and Lymphatic Society, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, and American Heart Association. These guidelines were compared against the consensus statements obtained through the surveys to determine how they relate to Australian and New Zealand practice. In addition, selected key studies, reviews, and meta-analyses on venous stenting were discussed and added to the document. Finally, a selection of statements with >75% agreement was voted on, and barriers to the guideline's applicability were identified. ResultsThe document addresses two key areas: patient selection and technical aspects of venous stenting. Regarding patient selection, patients with a CEAP (Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Physiologic) score of ≥3 or a venous clinical severity score for pain of ≥2, or both, and evidence of >50% stenosis on venography, computed tomography venography, magnetic resonance venography, and/or intravascular ultrasound should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ib) Patients undergoing thrombus removal for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, in whom a culprit stenotic lesion has been uncovered, should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ib). Patients with chronic pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, postcoital pain affecting their quality of life, when other causes have been ruled out, should be considered for venous stenting (level of recommendation Ic). Asymptomatic patients should not be offered venous stenting (level of recommendation IIIc). ConclusionsPatients with deep VOO have been underdiagnosed and undertreated for decades; however, in recent years, interest from physicians and industry has grown substantially. The advent of simpler and safer treatment options has revolutionized its management, but, unfortunately, formal training for venous disease has not grown at the same rate. Simplifying the technology and training required can result in inconsistent outcomes. These guidelines are aimed at developing standards of care and will serve as an educational platform for future developments.

MISLEADING POST PRANDIAL PAIN: MEDIAN ARCUATE LIGAMENT SYNDROME REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND CASE REPORT

Introduction:Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare disease with different names. Patients are usually young females, presenting with abdominal pain and weight loss. The symptoms are caused by compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. Case report: A 35-year-old male patientwas admitted as a case of COVID, with a chronic history of postprandial abdominal pain. The patient was treated before for a helicobacterpylori infection after presentation with the same complaint. When he resolved his COVID condition, an abdominal computed tomography incidentally showed celiac artery stenosis with a hooking appearance. He underwent a laparoscopic release. Interestingly, he was readmitted after 25 days and diagnosed to have Addisons disease. Discussion: Due to the syndromes rarity, it is usually diagnosed after the exclusion of more common differentials. Although that the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) is considering MALS as the most common cause of single-vessel arterial stenosis. The diagnosis is made through the presentation of radiological evidence of celiac trunk compression. The release is the mainstay of treatment for the best outcome and is trending nowadays to be by the laparoscopic procedure. Conclusion: There is not enough MALS awareness, and there are needs to be established. This can happenthrough more proper case reviews, trials of new approaches, and management.

Russian consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with carotid stenosis

Carotid stenosis is a multidisciplinary problem that requires the involvement of a specialists’ team, including cardiovascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, endovascular surgeons, cardiologists, neurologists, and internists. In this consensus statement, a group of experts considered the main stages of diagnosing carotid stenosis, as well as discussed, the necessary prevention methods and features of choosing the optimal treatment approach. The aim was to provide concise and structured information on the management of patients with carotid stenosis. This document was developed based on the updated clinical guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Association for Vascular Surgery, taking into account the consensus opinion of Russian experts.

Long-term age-stratified survival following endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Presented at the 2021 Vascular Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery, San Diego, California, August 18-21, 2021; and at the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, September 27-29, 2021.

Long-term age-stratified survival following endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Presented at the 2021 Vascular Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery, San Diego, California, August 18-21, 2021; and at the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, September 27-29, 2021.

Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Radiation Safety

Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Radiation Safety

Is Revascularization of V1 Segment of Vertebral Artery Combined with Ipsilateral Carotid Endarterectomy Safe?

The recommendation of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) is that vertebral revascularization combined with ipsilateral CEA (carotid endarterectomy) should not be performed in the same operation. ESVS believes that vertebral revascularization combined with ipsilateral CEA increases perioperative death/stroke rates. In our opinion, revascularization of the first segment of vertebral artery (V1) combined with ipsilateral CEA is safe compared to vertebral V1 revascularization in the perioperative period. The purpose of this study is to prove that revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA is secure in the perioperative period. We describe our experience with homochronous revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery with ipsilateral CEA (group B) and simple revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery (group A) in 48 consecutive patients during a 5-year period. O.Y. (Ouyang) incisions were used in both groups. We compare the results of the 2 procedures with aspects of mortality, stroke, morbidity, incident rates of complications, and so on. There was no significant difference between patients in group A and group B in terms of red blood cell reduction, postoperative ventilator using time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative drainage days, postoperative hospitalize duration, and incident rates of postoperative complications. The postoperative complications include death, stroke, Horner syndrome, vocal paralysis, hypoglossal nerve paralysis, wound hematomas, and lymphatic leakage. Revascularization of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA should be divided into revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA and revascularization of V3 segment of vertebral artery with ipsilateral CEA. Revascularization of V1 segment of vertebral artery combined with ipsilateral CEA is safe; it can be performed for suitable patients who are fit for indications. O.Y. incisions can fully expose the target blood vessels and simplify the procedures without transecting the sternocleidomastoid muscles in operations.