European Association Of Nuclear Medicine Research Articles

Diagnostic imaging of the diabetic foot: an EANM evidence-based guidance.

Consensus on the choice of the most accurate imaging strategy in diabetic foot infective and non-infective complications is still lacking. This document provides evidence-based recommendations, aiming at defining which imaging modality should be preferred in different clinical settings. This working group includes 8 nuclear medicine physicians appointed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), 3 radiologists and 3 clinicians (one diabetologist, one podiatrist and one infectious diseases specialist) selected for their expertise in diabetic foot. The latter members formulated some clinical questions that are not completely covered by current guidelines. These questions were converted into statements and addressed through a systematic analysis of available literature by using the PICO (Population/Problem-Intervention/Indicator-Comparator-Outcome) strategy. Each consensus statement was scored for level of evidence and for recommendation grade, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) criteria. Nine clinical questions were formulated by clinicians and used to provide 7 evidence-based recommendations: (1) A patient with a positive probe-to-bone test, positive plain X-rays and elevated ESR should be treated for presumptive osteomyelitis (OM). (2) Advanced imaging with MRI and WBC scintigraphy, or [18F]FDG PET/CT, should be considered when it is needed to better evaluate the location, extent or severity of the infection, in order to plan more tailored treatment. (3) In a patient with suspected OM, positive PTB test but negative plain X-rays, advanced imaging with MRI or WBC scintigraphy + SPECT/CT, or with [18F]FDG PET/CT, is needed to accurately assess the extent of the infection. (4) There are no evidence-based data to definitively prefer one imaging modality over the others for detecting OM or STI in fore- mid- and hind-foot. MRI is generally the first advanced imaging modality to be performed. In case of equivocal results, radiolabelled WBC imaging or [18F]FDG PET/CT should be used to detect OM or STI. (5) MRI is the method of choice for diagnosing or excluding Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy; [18F]FDG PET/CT can be used as an alternative. (6) If assessing whether a patient with a Charcot foot has a superimposed infection, however, WBC scintigraphy may be more accurate than [18F]FDG PET/CT in differentiating OM from Charcot arthropathy. (7) Whenever possible, microbiological or histological assessment should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. (8) Consider appealing to an additional imaging modality in a patient with persisting clinical suspicion of infection, but negative imaging. These practical recommendations highlight, and should assist clinicians in understanding, the role of imaging in the diagnostic workup of diabetic foot complications.

EANM practice guidelines for an appropriate use of PET and SPECT for patients with epilepsy.

Epilepsy is one of the most frequent neurological conditions with an estimated prevalence of more than 50 million people worldwide and an annual incidence of two million. Although pharmacotherapy with anti-seizure medication (ASM) is the treatment of choice, ~30% of patients with epilepsy do not respond to ASM and become drug resistant. Focal epilepsy is the most frequent form of epilepsy. In patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, epilepsy surgery is a treatment option depending on the localisation of the seizure focus for seizure relief or seizure freedom with consecutive improvement in quality of life. Beside examinations such as scalp video/electroencephalography (EEG) telemetry, structural, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which are primary standard tools for the diagnostic work-up and therapy management of epilepsy patients, molecular neuroimaging using different radiopharmaceuticals with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) influences and impacts on therapy decisions. To date, there are no literature-based praxis recommendations for the use of Nuclear Medicine (NM) imaging procedures in epilepsy. The aims of these guidelines are to assist in understanding the role and challenges of radiotracer imaging for epilepsy; to provide practical information for performing different molecular imaging procedures for epilepsy; and to provide an algorithm for selecting the most appropriate imaging procedures in specific clinical situations based on current literature. These guidelines are written and authorized by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) to promote optimal epilepsy imaging, especially in the presurgical setting in children, adolescents, and adults with focal epilepsy. They will assist NM healthcare professionals and also specialists such as Neurologists, Neurophysiologists, Neurosurgeons, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, and others involved in epilepsy management in the detection and interpretation of epileptic seizure onset zone (SOZ) for further treatment decision. The information provided should be applied according to local laws and regulations as well as the availability of various radiopharmaceuticals and imaging modalities.

Formulating a national position statement and guide on modern theranostics in the Philippines.

Barriers to the establishment of advanced technologies in developing countries were overcome when modern theranostics pertaining to the use of Ga-68 and Lu-177 PSMA and DOTATATE were first offered to patients in the Philippines in early 2018. However, significant growth was not experienced at St. Luke's Medical Center for five years and lutetium was not yet distributed to other institutions by a radiopharmaceutical supplier. Due to the relative novelty and rapid expansion of theranostics worldwide, position statements were released by the Australasian Association of Nuclear Medicine Specialists, European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and International Atomic Energy Agency primarily to uphold patient safety and ensure a level of standard among its practitioners. Subsequently in the latter half of 2022, these were adopted and modified according to what is feasible and applicable locally within the Philippine Society of Nuclear Medicine, considering the current status and future possibilities. Different representatives were involved, and several groups were mobilized for successful implementation. A liability clause was incorporated to discourage unprofessional acts.

Preparation for radioiodine therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: a modern perspective (a review)

Thyroid cancer is the most prevalent tumor of the endocrine system, accounting for 1%–3% of all malignant neoplasms as of 2021. Differentiated forms, papillary and follicular, with a relatively favorable prognosis, are detected in 90% of cases. The combination of surgical treatment, subsequent suppressive hormonal therapy, and radioiodine therapy provides a favorable prognosis in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. However, an insufficient response to radioiodine therapy may be possible, which may be associated with multiple factors, including the preparation step for radioiodine therapy. To date, the question of choosing the optimal method of patient preparation remains relevant. This paper presents a review of the scientific literature on the preparation of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer for radioiodine therapy. The principles of preparation are based on the recommendations of leading expert societies, and publications related to this topic are highlighted and summarized, including the adverse events associated with radioiodine therapy, quality of life, efficacy, and long-term results of treatment. The main purpose of this review was to provide a comprehensive insight into the methods of preparing a patient with differentiated thyroid cancer for radioiodine therapy, highlight existing problems and promising areas of research, and modernize treatment toward personalized therapy. Scientific articles and reviews from the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases, published up to the end of January 2023, were searched by the keywords listed below in their various combinations. Recommendations from the following scientific communities were used: Russian Clinical Guidelines for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, American Thyroid Association, European Thyroid Association, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Nuclear Medicine, British Thyroid Association, and European Society for Medical Oncology. Articles not available in full, not in English or Russian, or systematic reviews of a similar topic, were excluded. In total, 124 sources were selected and analyzed, general tendencies of modern approaches to preparation for radioiodine therapy and actual problems were highlighted, concepts of optimization of preparation for radioiodine therapy within the framework of personalized therapy were covered, and results and conclusions were presented.

A CONGRESS DIGEST ON RADIOLABELED THERANOSTICS FOR SOLID TUMORS. Report from the 36th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), September 9th – 13th, 2023, Vienna

A CONGRESS DIGEST ON RADIOLABELED THERANOSTICS FOR SOLID TUMORS. Report from the 36th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), September 9th – 13th, 2023, Vienna

Association between body mass index (BMI) and [123I]Ioflupane (DaTSCAN) availabilities in patients with parkinsonism using single-photon emission computed tomography–computed tomography (SPECT-CT)

Aim[123I]Ioflupane (DaTSCAN) has a high binding affinity to the dopamine (DA) transporter (DaT) and tenfold less affinity to serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT). Both neurotransmitters are considered to contribute to body weight regulation. This study assesses the association between body mass index (BMI) and DaTSCAN availability in brain.MethodScans from 74 consecutive patients who had undergone DaTSCAN single-photon emission computed tomography–computed tomography (SPECT-CT) were used to obtain semi- and absolute quantitative data in several volumes of interest (VOIs). Relative semi-quantitative specific binding ratios (SBRs) from Chang attenuated SPECT were obtained from GE DaTQUANT. Absolute normalised concentration (NC) was calculated from attenuation/scatter corrected SPECT-CT images, using an adapted version of the EARL Ltd (European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Research 4 Life) template. Scans were subdivided into either degenerative parkinsonism (abnormal = 49), borderline (n = 14) or scan without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD = 11) using visual assessment and SBR values by two nuclear medicine consultants.ResultsSBRs did not correlate with BMI. However, NC values correlated negatively in the entire cohort, with the strongest correlation in the frontal (r = − 0.649. p = 0.000), occipital (r = − 0.555, p = 0.000) regions and pons (r = − 0.555, p = 0.000). In the abnormal (n = 49) and SWEDD group (n = 11), NC of the frontal region was the most correlated with BMI (r = − 0.570, p = 0.000; r = − 0.813, p = 0.002, respectively). In the borderline group (n = 14), the left posterior putamen displayed the strongest correlation (r = − 0.765, p = 0.001).ConclusionAbsolute NC values demonstrate a strong inverse correlation with BMI, strongest in the extrastriatal regions. Due to the predominately non-overlapping distribution of DaT and SERT, this study suggests greater involvement of SERT in obesity with possible interplay with DA transmission.

[Guideline for Radioiodine Therapy for Benign Thyroid Diseases(6/2022 - AWMF No. 031-003)].

This version of the guideline for radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid disorders is an update of the version, which was published by the German Society of Nuclear Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nuklearmedizin, DGN) in co-ordination with the German Society of Endocrinology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endokrinologie, DGE, Sektion Schilddrüse) and the German Society of General- and Visceral-Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, DGAV) in 2015. This guideline was harmonized with the recommendations of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). According to the German "Directive on Radiation Protection in Medicine" the physician specialised in nuclear medicine ("Fachkunde in der Therapie mit offenen radioaktiven Stoffen") is responsible for the justification to treat with radioiodine. Therefore, relevant medical indications for radioiodine therapy and alternative therapeutic options are discussed within the guideline. This procedure guideline is developed in the consensus of an expert group. This fulfils the level S1 (first step) within the German classification of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Use of Oral Empagliflozin to Obtain Optimal Blood Sugar Levels for Conducting 18 F-FDG PET-CT in Patients with Hyperglycemia-A Pilot Study.

Background  Flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET-CT) is a well-established imaging modality for the evaluation of patients with oncological and nononcological conditions. The underlying principle of imaging is the preferentially increased glucose consumption by cancer cells, due to overexpression of glucose type 1 receptors that are insulin independent. Thus, one of the factors that leads to decreased sensitivity of an 18 F-FDG PET-CT is elevated blood sugar levels, leading to decreased glucose uptake by cancer cells due to competitive inhibition. A significant percentage of patients scheduled for PET-CT scan has diabetes mellitus type II as a comorbid condition and often has elevated random blood sugar (RBS) precluding an upfront PET-CT evaluation. Such cases must be rescheduled. This causes delay in the evaluation and management of such patients. Empagliflozin is a novel sodium glucose type 2 inhibitor that prevents tubular reabsorption of glucose and increases renal glycosuria resulting in decreased blood sugar. This drug does not cause significant hypoglycemia or increase endogenous insulin secretion. This study was undertaken to evaluate a potential role for empagliflozin in facilitating optimal blood sugar control in patients with hyperglycemia on the day of the scheduled PET scan. Methods  This is an interventional prospective study and patients detected to have RBS more than 200 mg/dL on the day of the scheduled scan were included in the study. The patients were administered two tablets of 10 mg empagliflozin and kept under observation. Samples for RBS were taken at approximately 2nd and 4th hour post administration by bedside method. These patients underwent scan on the same day after adequate sugar control and when an RBS of less than 200 mg/dL was achieved. The primary outcome studied was change in RBS values in the patient cohort and evaluation of PET SUV (standardized uptake value) compared with the rest of the patients scheduled on the same day. Secondary outcome was assessment of any side effects in the patients. Results  Total of 10 patients were found to have elevated blood sugar (RBS > 200 mg/dL; irrespective of being on medication) and did not meet the evaluation criteria for a PET-CT scan on the scheduled day. Following administration of the drug, all 10 patients were able to attain blood sugar levels and fulfill the criteria for undergoing a PET-CT scan. No obvious side effect was noted in any of the patient. The SUV values of the patient cohort were comparable with the rest of the patient scanned on the day. Conclusion  In this pilot study, 20 mg of empagliflozin (2 tablets of 10 mg) appears to be a safe and effective method for achieving optimal decrease in the RBS without causing hypoglycemia or hyperinsulinemia. It can be safely employed in the subset of population with RBS between 201 and 300 mg/dL to adequately bring the sugar levels at acceptable levels RBS less than 200 mg/dl and fulfill the FDG PET-CT criteria as per European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) norms.

International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology

PreambleThe Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The merged International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) is an international, nonprofit, scientific association whose purpose is to promote communication, research, development, and applications in the field of magnetic resonance in medicine and biology and other related topics and to develop and provide channels and facilities for continuing education in the field.The ISMRM was founded in 1994 through the merger of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging.The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM/ISMRM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized.These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNMMI, the ISMRM, and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines.The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment.Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Palliative Nuclear Medicine Therapies of Bone Metastases.

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional

Clinical audit in European radiology: current status and recommendations for improvement endorsed by the European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Clinical audit is an important quality improvement activity and has significant benefits for patients in terms of enhanced care, safety, experience and outcomes. Clinical audit in support of radiation protection is mandated within the European Council Basic Safety Standards Directive (BSSD), 2013/59/Euratom. The European Society of Radiology (ESR) has recognised clinical audit as an area of particular importance in the delivery of safe and effective health care. The ESR, alongside other European organisations and professional bodies, has developed a range of clinical audit-related initiatives to support European radiology departments in developing a clinical audit infrastructure and fulfilling their legal obligations. However, work by the European Commission, the ESR and other agencies has demonstrated a persisting variability in clinical audit uptake and implementation across Europe and a lack of awareness of the BSSD clinical audit requirements. In recognition of these findings, the European Commission supported the QuADRANT project, led by the ESR and in partnership with ESTRO (European Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology) and EANM (European Association of Nuclear Medicine). QuADRANT was a 30-month project which completed in Summer 2022, aiming to provide an overview of the status of European clinical audit and identifying barriers and challenges to clinical audit uptake and implementation. This paper summarises the current position of European radiological clinical audit and considers the barriers and challenges that exist. Reference is made to the QuADRANT project, and a range of potential solutions are suggested to enhance radiological clinical audit across Europe.

A CONGRESS DIGEST ON RADIOLABELED THERANOSTICS FOR SOLID TUMORS. Report from the 35th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), October 15th – 19th, 2022, Barcelona

A CONGRESS DIGEST ON RADIOLABELED THERANOSTICS FOR SOLID TUMORS. Report from the 35th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), October 15th – 19th, 2022, Barcelona

Radioisotope Safety: 12 Real-life Scenarios

HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 43, No. 4 PreviousNext Nuclear MedicineRadioGraphics FundamentalsRadioisotope Safety: 12 Real-life ScenariosHarit Kapoor1 , Vaibhav Gulati2, M. Elizabeth OatesHarit Kapoor1 , Vaibhav Gulati2, M. Elizabeth OatesAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (H.K.); Imaging Associates, National Heart Institute, New Delhi, India (V.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, UK HealthCare/Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Ky (M.E.O.).Address correspondence to H.K. (email: [email protected]).Harit Kapoor1 Vaibhav Gulati2M. Elizabeth OatesPublished Online:Mar 23 2023https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220077MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In AbstractThis slide presentation provides high-yield fundamental concepts, facts, and figures related to radioisotope safety through the use of illustrated real-life scenarios to improve situational recall in daily clinical practice.Suggested Readings1. ACR-AAPM radiation safety officer resources. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Radiology-Safety/Radiation-Safety/ACRAAPM-RSO-Resources.pdf. Revised 2021. Accessed May 24, 2022. Google Scholar2. Baldwin JA, Bag AK, White SL, Palot-Manzil FF, O’Malley JP. All you need to know as an authorized user. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205(2):251–258. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Chen MY. Radiation protection and regulations for the nuclear medicine physician. Semin Nucl Med 2014;44(3):215–228. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Cho SG, Kim J, Song HC. Radiation safety in nuclear medicine procedures. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;51(1):11–16. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guide on best practices in nuclear medicine. https://www.eanm.org/publications/technologists-guide/. Accessed May 24, 2022. Google Scholar6. Marengo M, Martin CJ, Rubow S, Sera T, Amador Z, Torres L. Radiation safety and accidental radiation exposures in nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 2022;52(2):94–113. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7. Mettler FA, Guiberteau MJ. Essentials of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier, 2018. Google Scholar8. O’Malley J, Zeissman H, Thrall JH. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: The requisites. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier, 2019. Google Scholar9. Saha GB. Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine: A practical, concise guide. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019. Crossref, Google Scholar10. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Guidance document on radiopharmaceutical administration during lactation. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1923/ML19232A081.pdf. Updated 2020. Accessed May 24, 2022. Google Scholar11. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Nuclear Medicine Licensee Toolkit. https://www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/med-use-toolkit/faqs-part35.html#3. Accessed May 24, 2022. Google Scholar12. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulations, guidance and communications page. https://www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/regs-guides-comm.html. Accessed May 24, 2022. Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Apr 5 2022Revision requested: May 12 2022Revision received: June 8 2022Accepted: June 17 2022Published online: Mar 23 2023 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsAccompanying This ArticleRadioisotope Safety: 12 Real-Life ScenariosMar 23 2023Default Digital Object SeriesRecommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 43, No. 4 Slide PresentationMetrics Altmetric Score PDF download

Hot spot imaging in cardiovascular diseases: an information statement from SNMMI, ASNC, and EANM

This information statement from the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and European Association of Nuclear Medicine describes the performance, interpretation, and reporting of hot spot imaging in nuclear cardiology. The field of nuclear cardiology has historically focused on cold spot imaging for the interpretation of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Hot spot imaging has been an important part of nuclear medicine, particularly for oncology or infection indications, and the use of hot spot imaging in nuclear cardiology continues to expand. This document focuses on image acquisition and processing, methods of quantification, indications, protocols, and reporting of hot spot imaging. Indications discussed include myocardial viability, myocardial inflammation, device or valve infection, large vessel vasculitis, valve calcification and vulnerable plaques, and cardiac amyloidosis. This document contextualizes the foundations of image quantification and highlights reporting in each indication for the cardiac nuclear imager.

Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction impact on quantitative metrics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Evaluate the quantitative, subjective (Deauville score [DS]) and reader agreement differences between standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction methods. A retrospective review of 104 F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) exams among 52 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. An unblinded radiologist moderator reviewed both BPL and OSEM PET/CT exams. Four blinded radiologists then reviewed the annotated cases to provide a visual DS for each annotated lesion. Significant (P < .001) differences in BPL and OSEM PET methods were identified with greater standard uptake value (SUV) maximum and SUV mean for BPL. The DS was altered in 25% of cases when BPL and OSEM were reviewed by the same radiologist. Interobserver DS agreement was higher for OSEM (>1 cm lesion = 0.89 and ≤1 cm lesion = 0.84) compared to BPL (>1 cm lesion = 0.85 and ≤1 cm lesion = 0.81). Among the 4 readers, average intraobserver visual DS agreement between OSEM and BPL was 0.67 for lesions >1cm and 0.4 for lesions ≤1 cm. F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma reconstructed with BPL has higher SUV values, altered DSs and reader agreement when compared to OSEM. This report finds volumetric PET measurements such as metabolic tumor volume to be similar between BPL and OSEM PET reconstructions. Efforts such as adoption of European Association Research Ltd accreditation should be made to harmonize PET data with an aim at balancing the need for harmonization and sensitivity for lesion detection.

Novelties from the Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM Guidelines on Immunotherapy.

In the past decade, the implementation of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has determined a major change in the management of oncological patients. The challenges associated to the new therapeutic regimen have promoted adapted criteria for response assessment to interpret imaging findings and atypical patterns of response. Parallel to the new morphological criteria, also 18fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography imaging has required novel approaches and specific guidelines on how to perform, interpret, and report the scan in patients with solid tumors under immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. A summary of the novelties related to the new joint international European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)/Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI)/Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM) guidelines on immunotherapy is provided herein to elucidate most critical aspects in image interpretation.

European Association of Nuclear Medicine – 35th Annual Congress. Barcelona – October 15-19, 2022

European Association of Nuclear Medicine – 35th Annual Congress. Barcelona – October 15-19, 2022

Head-to-head comparisons of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and prostate-specific antigen for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer patients: a prospective study.

The optimal tool to evaluate the tumour therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains uncertain. We compared the role of [68Ga]-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT), multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and assessed the practical value of the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EAU/EANM) recommended criteria of PSMA PET/CT to evaluate the therapeutic responses to NCHT in patients with high-risk non-metastatic PCa. This prospective study included 72 high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients receiving NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy from June 2021 to March 2022. PSA testing, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and mpMRI scanning were conducted in all patients before and after NCHT. Therapeutic responses to NCHT were evaluated with PSA, RECIST 1.1, PERCIST 1.0, and EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Postoperative pathological results were considered the reference standard. A favourable pathological response was defined as pathologic complete remission (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's kappa index. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictive value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived parameters. All cases experienced a marked decrease in PSA levels after NCHT. Twenty-four (33.33%) cases experienced a favourable pathological response, including five (6.94%) cases of pCR and 19 (26.39%) cases of MRD. According to the results of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, EAU/EANM recommended criteria indicated that 20 (27.78%) cases had a CR, whereas PERCIST 1.0 criteria indicated that 23 (31.94%) cases had a CR. There was a strong association between EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria (Pearson's R=0.857). The sensitivity (75.00%, 79.17% vs. 58.33%, 58.33%), specificity (95.83%, 91.67% vs. 83.33%, 68.75%), PLR (18.00, 9.50 vs. 3.50, 1.87), NLR (0.26, 0.23 vs. 0.50, 0.61), PPV (90.0%, 82.6% vs. 63.6%, 48.3%), and NPV (88.5%, 89.8% vs. 80.0%, 76.7%) of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (including EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria) to predict favourable pathological responses were all superior to those of mpMRI and nadir PSA. The kappa index to predict a favourable pathological response was 0.257 for PSA, 0.426 for RECIST 1.1, 0.716 for PERCIST 1.0, and 0.739 for EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the post-NCHT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) before radical prostatectomy was an independent predictor of a favourable pathological response to NCHT. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a better concordance with a favourable pathological response to NCHT compared with nadir PSA and mpMRI. EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria performed equally to identify pathological responders when [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was used as a therapeutic response assessment tool.

One institutions' experience with a true standard 15 mCi dose of I-131 for the treatment of Graves' disease.

Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the fixed dosage of RAI to be administered for this purpose between the main guideline frameworks set forth by the American Thyroid Association (ATA), Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Thyroid Association (ETA). In this retrospective study, we will investigate the effectiveness of using a standard dose of 15 mCi ±10% of RAI in the treatment of Graves'. A retrospective chart review was conducted for the period between 1 May 2014 and 2 September 2020, to identify patients diagnosed with hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease. The patients were grouped based on outcome and assessed for the efficacy of the dosage of 15 mCi ±10% of RAI in a successful treatment. Sixty-seven patients were identified that met the inclusion criteria between 1 May 2014 and 2 September 2020. Of the 67 RAI ablations; 60 patients became hypothyroid [60/67, (89.55%)], 2 euthyroid [2/67, (2.99%)] and 5 remained hyperthyroid [5/67, (7.46%)]. For the treatment of Graves' disease, the use of a standard low dose of 15 mCi ±10% has a high success rate without additional measurements or calculations beyond a standard planar image and 24-h uptake %. The adoption of a standard low dose of 15 mCi of I-131 across institutional guidelines would streamline dosage questions and eliminate the need to determine the weight of the thyroid for calculations in all RAI treatments for hyperthyroidism caused by Graves' disease.

Nuclear medicine in the assessment and prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity: prospects and proposal of use by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)

Cardiotoxicity may present as (pulmonary) hypertension, acute and chronic coronary syndromes, venous thromboembolism, cardiomyopathies/heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and myocarditis. Many of these disease entities can be diagnosed by established cardiovascular diagnostic pathways. Nuclear medicine, however, has proven promising in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies/heart failure, and peri- and myocarditis as well as arterial inflammation. This article first outlines the spectrum of cardiotoxic cancer therapies and the potential side effects. This will be complemented by the definition of cardiotoxicity using non-nuclear cardiovascular imaging (echocardiography, CMR) and biomarkers. Available nuclear imaging techniques are then presented and specific suggestions are made for their application and potential role in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity.