During 1980-84 I studied the fates of 821 artificial nests, 96 naturally occurring capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) nests, and 12 black grouse (T. tetrix) nests at Varaldskogen, Norway. In 4 of the 5 years artificial nests with poor cover had higher loss rates than natural capercaillie nests. In 1981 natural capercaillie nests had a higher loss rate than artificial nests with poor cover. In 1981 the loss rate of natural capercaillie and black grouse nests increased as the season progressed, while the loss rate of artificial nests was constantly low. Capercaillie nests were probably detected by scent by predators most years, while predators oriented mainly by sight probably robbed most artificial nests. Loss of artificial nests was not an index to the loss of capercaillie nests. In artificial nests the losses depended on nest cover; however, natural capercaillie nests in poor cover had higher losses than nests in good cover only during 1 year. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 52(1):123-126 Many bird species suffer high nest losses. Because artificial nests are easy to make they have been used to study the causes of nest losses and predator hunting strategies (Goransson et al. 1975, Boag et al. 1984, Angelstam 1986). In some studies (Henry 1969, Dzieciolowski and Matuszewski 1982, Miiller 1985) results from experiments with artificial nests have been extrapolated to natural nests. This has been done even though the relation between losses in natural versus artificial nests has not been properly evaluated. I compared nest losses of artificial nests with losses of naturally occurring capercaillie and black grouse nests (unprepared depressions in the ground) to determine if predation on artificial nests could be used as an index to predation on natural nests. The experiment was designed to separate predators that used scent from those that mainly relied on sight to locate the prey. This study was financed by the Norwegian Directorate of Nature Conservation and T. Gotaas Fund. The study was conducted in close collaboration with P. Wegge. His help and advice were essential. B. B. Larsen, L. Kastdalen and the rest of the staff at Varaldskogen Field Station assisted in the field. K. E. Erikstad, N. C. Stenseth and P. Angelstam gave valuable comments about the manuscript. S. BondrupNielsen and R. W. Dimmick have kindly improved the language. STUDY AREA This study was conducted at Varaldskogen (60010'N, 12030'E) in Hedmark County, Norway, situated in the Middle Boreal Zone (Abrahamsen et al. 1977). Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus silvestris) were the dominating tree species, and blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) and heather (Calluna vulgaris) dominated the ground layer. Potential egg-predators were red fox (Vulpes vulpes), pine marten (Martes martes), badger (Meles meles), stoat (Mustela erminea), weasel (Mustela nivalis), hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix), common raven (C. corax), and jay (Garrulus glandarius).
Read full abstract