European non-governmental organizations very often struggle with their sustainability. This sustainability is focused on two levels: financial and organizational. Financial sustainability—in times of economic crisis—is at the forefront. Next to own income, such as membership fees, most European NGOs have to find extra sources of income. Projects and grants from the European Commission are a good source of extra income, but with limited resources available and a high number of excellent quality projects, you might just miss the opportunity. The best option, which has worked really well for EUPHA, is to increase the own income and increase the number of financial sources. The reorganization of the European Journal of Public Health and the successful management of the EJPH by Peter Allebeck and his team at Karolinska Institutet have provided EUPHA with a solid second source of own income. And the collaboration with the European Public Health Conference Foundation has even provided a third source of (nearly) own income. With this financial structure, EUPHA is reasonably secure in covering the core activities, but for all extra activities, EUPHA, like most other European NGOs, is looking for other financial sources. For instance, the EJPH editorial office has been supported by the Swedish Research Foundation for numerous years. The other level for sustainability is organizational. Keeping in mind the financial situation, most of the European NGOs work with a small team of committed professionals, which does make them vulnerable. And this vulnerability can be clearly seen if one of the staff leaves the organization. At EUPHA Office, nobody has left the organization, but I have had to take a leave of absence due to illness, and this has certainly had an impact on our organizational sustainability. And even here, we see that EUPHA is up for the challenge. The small team of dedicated …