Ethnic Disparities In Health Care Research Articles

Anti-racist interventions to reduce ethnic disparities in healthcare in the UK: an umbrella review and findings from healthcare, education and criminal justice

ObjectivesTo assess the evidence for anti-racist interventions which aim to reduce ethnic disparities in healthcare, with a focus on implementation in the UK healthcare system.DesignUmbrella review.Data sourcesEmbase, Medline, Social Policy...

Mapping racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for persons living with dementia: A scoping review.

We set out to map evidence of disparities in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias healthcare, including issues of access, quality, and outcomes for racial/ethnic minoritized persons living with dementia (PLWD) and family caregivers. We conducted a scoping review of the literature published from 2000 to 2022 in PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. The inclusion criteria were: (1) focused on PLWD and/or family caregivers, (2) examined disparities or differences in healthcare, (3) were conducted in the United States, (4) compared two or more racial/ethnic groups, and (5) reported quantitative or qualitative findings. Key findings include accumulating evidence that minoritized populations are less likely to receive an accurate and timely diagnosis, be prescribed anti-dementia medications, and use hospice care, and more likely to have ahigher risk of hospitalization and receive more aggressive life-sustaining treatment at the end-of-life. Future studies need to examine underlying processes and develop interventions to reduce disparities while also being more broadly inclusive of diverse populations.

Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in the United States: An Overview and Update.

There were 36,136 new HIV diagnoses in the United States and dependent areas in 2021, despite a 12% reduction in estimated HIV incidence from 2017 to 2021. The burden of HIV remains disproportionately high among certain populations, including gay and bisexual men, Black/African American individuals, and Hispanic/Latino individuals, and racial and ethnic health care disparities persist. The Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative aims to significantly reduce new infections, with a focus on HIV prevention, particularly the use of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). However, challenges remain in achieving equitable PrEP distribution. As frontline health care providers, nurses play a pivotal role in this battle against HIV. This article provides an update on PrEP screening recommendations, the types of PrEP available, dosing, adverse effects, and the role of nurses in patient support and monitoring.

Improving health equity through health care systems research.

To describe health equity research priorities for health care delivery systems and delineate a research and action agenda that generates evidence-based solutions to persistent racial and ethnic inequities in health outcomes. This project was conducted as a component of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) stakeholder engaged process to develop an Equity Agenda and Action Plan to guide priority setting to advance health equity. Recommendations were developed and refined based on expert input, evidence review, and stakeholder engagement. Participating stakeholders included experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government. Expert group consensus, informed by stakeholder engagement and targeted evidence review. Priority themes were derived iteratively through (1) brainstorming and idea reduction, (2) targeted evidence review of candidate themes, (3) determination of preliminary themes; (4) input on preliminary themes from stakeholders attending AHRQ's 2022 Health Equity Summit; and (5) and refinement of themes based on that input. The final set of research and action recommendations was determined by authors' consensus. Health care delivery systems have contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in health care. High quality research is needed to inform health care delivery systems approaches to undo systemic barriers and inequities. We identified six priority themes for research; (1) institutional leadership, culture, and workforce; (2) data-driven, culturally tailored care; (3) health equity targeted performance incentives; (4) health equity-informed approaches to health system consolidation and access; (5) whole person care; (6) and whole community investment. We also suggest cross-cutting themes regarding research workforce and research timelines. As the nation's primary health services research agency, AHRQ can advance equitable delivery of health care by funding research and disseminating evidence to help transform the organization and delivery of health care.

Effects of Maternal SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Neonatal Discharge Planning and Care: Exacerbation of Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities.

To determine if SARS-CoV-2 disproportionately impacted infants born to racial and ethnic minorities and if virus exposure led to decreased access to care. This study was an observational case-control study, between March 2020 and March 2022 in Portland, Maine. Forty-seven cases and 47 controls were enrolled. Cases were infants born to mothers diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 at delivery, and controls were infants matched by date of birth, born to SARS-CoV-2 negative women. Demographic data, maternal clinical data, infant outcomes, and infant discharge plans were compared using Chi squared or Fisher Exact tests. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of race on neonatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were more likely Black or Hispanic than White and Non-Hispanic early in the pandemic, with reversal during the second year. SARS-CoV-2-exposed infants experienced delays in routine newborn outpatient care, although delay improved over the pandemic. Infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were initially more likely to be infants of color. During this time, infants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were also experiencing significant delays in newborn care.

Ethical and Policy Implications of Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities in Sleep Health.

Despite efforts in recent years, including in policy and research, to address health disparities in the United States, many of those disparities continue to fester in marginalized racial/ethnic populations. Understanding sleep health disparities is critical in understanding the health and wellness of these groups. Using obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Black populations as a focus, this paper presents the role of race and ethnicity in the clinical understanding of sleep health-related issues by medical practitioners and the implications of the lack of clear policies or best practices to guide medical practitioners' attempts to meet sleep-related needs of marginalized racial/ethnic populations. Furthermore, the knowledge gap may be further complicated by the poor understanding and integration of existing evidence with the many, complex, sleep-associated co-morbidities. Policymaking in this area ought to be based on the ethical implications of disparate sleep-related health outcomes by race and ethnicity. So, we conclude by offering recommendations for developing ethically sound policies for addressing sleep problems in marginalized racial and ethnic populations.

Obstetrical health care inequities in a universally insured health care system

Racial and ethnic disparities in health care exist and are rooted in long-standing systemic inequities. These disparities result in significant excess health care expenditures and are due to complex interactions between patients, health care providers and systems, and social and environmental factors. In perinatal care, these inequities also exist, with Black patients being 3 to 4 times more likely to die of childbirth compared with White patients. Similar health care inequities may also exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, stable employment, and social programs that benefit military families. This study aimed to evaluate racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes in the Military Health System. This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries from 2019 to 2021 in the Military Health System, which provides obstetrical care for approximately 35,000 annual deliveries. The study was conducted using National Perinatal Information Center data on cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity from direct-care military hospitals representing tertiary care medical centers and community hospitals in the United States and abroad. Chi-square analyses and binary logistic regression were used to compare groups. The cohort included 68,918 deliveries. Of these, 32,358 (47%) were White, 9594 (13.9%) Black, 3120 (4.5%) Asian Pacific Islander, 456 (0.7%) American Indian/Alaska Native, 19,543 (28.4%) other, 3976 (5.8%) unknown, 7096 (10.3%) Hispanic, 58,009 (84.2%) non-Hispanic, and 4399 (6.4%) other ethnicity. Rates of cesarean delivery were significantly higher for Black (30%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.52), Asian Pacific Islander (27%; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.35), and other (26%; odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.25) compared with White race (23%) (P<.001). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were higher for Black (5.9%; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.24) and Asian Pacific Islander (7.7%; odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.72) compared with White race (5.3%) (P<.001). Severe maternal morbidity was higher for Black (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.67), Asian Pacific Islander (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.82), and other (2.8%; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.54) compared with White race (2.1%) (P<.001). For severe maternal morbidity excluding blood transfusions, rates were also significantly higher for Black (1%; odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.17) than for White race (0.6%) (P<.002). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower rate of severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusions (0.5%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.98) compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity (0.7%) (P=.04). Racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, with significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery and severe maternal morbidity in Black, Asian Pacific Islander, and other races compared with White race. These findings suggest that these disparities are likely related to other factors or social determinants of health rather than availability of health care and insurance coverage. Further work should include investigation into such social determinants of health to address their causes, including systemic and structural barriers.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Physical and Mental Health Care and Clinical Trials.

Historically, in the United States, scientific racism has been used to justify differential treatment of Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) populations compared with the White population. Discrimination toward BIPOC populations by the medical community has contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in health care that persist to this day. At the 2022 American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology Annual Meeting, a panel of 5 experts from the areas of academia, advocacy, and clinical research discussed racial and ethnic disparities in mental health care. This Academic Highlights summarizes and expands on that discussion by tracing the history of scientific racism from the colonization of the US to present-day health inequities, illustrating the ongoing problem of low diversity in clinical trials, and outlining solutions through community engagement.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Use and Access Associated With Loss of Medicaid Supplemental Insurance Eligibility Above the Federal Poverty Level

Medicaid supplemental insurance covers most cost sharing in Medicare. Among low-income Medicare beneficiaries, the loss of Medicaid eligibility above this program's income eligibility threshold (100% of federal poverty level [FPL]) may exacerbate racial and ethnic disparities in Medicare beneficiaries' ability to afford care. To examine whether exceeding the income threshold for Medicaid, which results in an abrupt loss of Medicaid eligibility, is associated with greater racial and ethnic disparities in access to and use of care. This cross-sectional study used a regression discontinuity design to assess differences in access to and use of care associated with exceeding the income threshold for Medicaid eligibility. We analyzed Medicare beneficiaries with incomes 0% to 200% of FPL from the 2008 to 2018 biennial waves of the Health and Retirement Study linked to Medicare administrative data. To identify racial and ethnic disparities associated with the loss of Medicaid eligibility, we compared discontinuities in outcomes among Black and Hispanic beneficiaries (n = 2885) and White beneficiaries (n = 5259). Analyses were conducted between January 1, 2022, and October 1, 2022. Patient-reported difficulty accessing care due to cost and outpatient service use, medication fills, and hospitalizations measured from Medicare administrative data. This cross-sectional study included 8144 participants (38 805 person-years), who when weighted represented 151 282 957 person-years in the community-dwelling population of Medicare beneficiaries aged 50 years and older and incomes less than 200% FPL. In the weighted sample, the mean (SD) age was 75.4 (9.4) years, 66.1% of beneficiaries were women, 14.8% were non-Hispanic Black, 13.6% were Hispanic, and 71.6% were White. Findings suggest that exceeding the Medicaid eligibility threshold was associated with a 43.8 percentage point (pp) (95% CI, 37.8-49.8) lower probability of Medicaid enrollment among Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries and a 31.0 pp (95% CI, 25.4-36.6) lower probability of Medicaid enrollment among White beneficiaries. Among Black and Hispanic beneficiaries, exceeding the threshold was associated with increased cost-related barriers to care (discontinuity: 5.7 pp; 95% CI, 2.0-9.4), lower outpatient use (-6.3 services per person-year; 95% CI, -10.4 to -2.2), and fewer medication fills (-6.9 fills per person-year; 95% CI, -11.4 to -2.5), but it was not associated with a statistically significant discontinuity in hospitalizations. Discontinuities in these outcomes were smaller or nonsignificant among White beneficiaries. Consequently, exceeding the threshold was associated with widened disparities, including greater reductions in outpatient service use (disparity: -6.2 services per person-year; 95% CI, -11.7 to -0.6; P = .03) and medication fills (disparity: -7.2 fills per person-year; 95% CI, -13.4 to -1.0; P = .02) among Black and Hispanic vs White beneficiaries. This cross-sectional study found that loss of eligibility for Medicaid supplemental insurance above the federal poverty level, which increases cost sharing in Medicare, was associated with increased racial and ethnic health care disparities among low-income Medicare beneficiaries. Expanding eligibility for Medicaid supplemental insurance may narrow these disparities.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardiac Procedural Care

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether the COVID-19 pandemic altered the racial and ethnic composition of patients receiving cardiac procedural care. This was a retrospective observational study. This study was conducted at a single tertiary-care university hospital. A total of 1,704 adult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=413), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=506), or atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation (n=785) from March 2019 through March 2022 were included in this study. No interventions were performed as this was a retrospective observational study. Patients were grouped based on the date of their procedure: pre-COVID (March 2019 to February 2020), COVID Year 1 (March 2020 to February 2021), and COVID Year 2 (March 2021 to March 2022). Population-adjusted procedural incidence rates during each period were examined and stratified based on race and ethnicity. The procedural incidence rate was higher for White patients versus Black, and non-Hispanic patients versus Hispanic patients for every procedure and every period. For TAVR, the difference in procedural rates between White patients versus Black patients decreased between the pre-COVID and COVID Year 1 (12.05-6.34 per 1,000,000 persons). For CABG, the difference in procedural rates between White patients versus Black, and non-Hispanic patients versus Hispanic patients did not change significantly. For AF ablations, the difference in procedural rates between White patients versus Black patients increased over time (13.06 to 21.55 to 29.64 per 1,000,000 persons in the pre-COVID, COVID Year 1, and COVID Year 2, respectively). Racial and ethnic disparities in access to cardiac procedural care were present throughout all study time periods at the authors' institution. Their findings reinforce the continuing need for initiatives to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access and delivery.

How Should We Measure and Interpret Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care?

How Should We Measure and Interpret Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care?

Strengthening the Public Health Partnership and Telehealth Infrastructure to Reduce Health Care Disparities.

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the urgency to focus on the essential value of public health systems (PHSs) in fostering health equity across the US health care delivery system. PHS integration and care coordination can be successfully achieved through health information technology systems. The objective of the study was to examine the association between PHS partnerships (PHSPs), telehealth postdischarge, and racial and ethnic disparities in health care. The analysis used 2017 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare 100% inpatient claims data, the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the American Community Survey. Results showed that compared with those treated in hospitals with neither PHSP nor telehealth postdischarge services, beneficiaries treated in hospitals with PHSP encountered significantly lower Medicare payment and inpatient and readmission rates. Black patients experienced significantly lower cost, inpatient visits, and readmission rates when treated in hospitals with PHSP and telehealth postdischarge services (coefficient = -0.051, P < 0.001; incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.982, P = 0.007; IRR = 0.891, P = 0.003). The results of the study demonstrated the importance of combining PHSP and telehealth postdischarge services to improve the efficiency of the health care delivery system and health equity. It is urgent to ensure that PHSs have adequate funding and telehealth infrastructure to support population health.

Why the Individual Provider Approach to Pediatric Palliative Care Consultation Exacerbates Healthcare Disparities: A Moral Argument for Standard Referral Criteria

Pediatric palliative care is specialized medical care for children who live with serious and life-limiting illnesses, with the central goal to improve quality of life for both children and their families. Presently, a majority of pediatric palliative care referrals are based on the traditional consultative model, in which primary providers serve as the gatekeepers to palliative care access. It is well-known that racial and ethnic healthcare disparities exist across the continuum of care, fraught with healthcare providers' biases that impact the care delivered. This includes the referral practices, allocation and utilization of palliative care services, and leaving vulnerable children and families with potentially unmet palliative care needs. We make the moral argument that the establishment of standard referral criteria for pediatric palliative care services is one simple step that must be taken to begin to address and hopefully ameliorate the impact of providers' biases and disparities that exist within pediatric palliative care.

ASHP-Association of Black Health-System Pharmacists Joint Leadership Award.

Angela Massey Hill, PharmD, CPh, RPh, is the 2022 recipient of the ASHP–Association of Black Health-System Pharmacists (ABHP) Joint Leadership Award. The award was established in 2009 to recognize people whose exceptional leadership has helped reduce racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Hill is associate dean and professor of pharmacy at the University of South Florida (USF) Health Taneja College of Pharmacy in Tampa. Her clinical work focuses primarily on neuropsychiatric conditions and gerontology. She has worked throughout her career to improve the care of people with dementia and to educate patients, clinicians, and caregivers about dementia and other memory disorders. She practices as a clinician at Reliance Medical Centers, where she provides medication therapy management and works with the organization’s Brain Health Awareness Program. She is also a consultant for the USF Neuroscience Byrd Alzheimer’s Institute. Hill was the 2004 recipient of a research endowment from Delta Sigma Theta Inc. for the investigation of biomarkers associated with Alzheimer’s disease in African Americans. The award launched and continues to drive her research agenda.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the advanced treatment of medically intractable pediatric epilepsy.

Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare have gained significant importance since the Institute of Medicine published its report on disparities in healthcare. There is a lack of evidence on how race and ethnicity affect access to advanced treatment of pediatric medically intractable epilepsy. In this context, the authors analyzed the latest Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for racial/ethnic disparities in access to surgical treatment of epilepsy. The authors queried the KID for the years 2016 and 2019 for the diagnosis of medically intractable epilepsy. A total of 29,292 patients were included in the sample. Of these patients, 8.9% (n = 2610) underwent surgical treatment/invasive monitoring. The mean ages in the surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment groups were 11.73 years (SD 5.75 years) and 9.5 years (SD 6.16 years), respectively. The most common insurance in the surgical group was private/commercial (55.9%) and Medicaid in the nonsurgical group (47.7%) (p < 0.001). White patients accounted for the most common population in both groups, followed by Hispanic patients. African American patients made up 7.9% in the surgical treatment group compared with 12.9% in the nonsurgical group. African American (41.1%) and Hispanic (29.9%) patients had higher rates of emergency department (ED) utilization compared with the White population (24.6%). After adjusting for all covariates, the odds of surgical treatment increased with increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.053-1.067; p < 0.001). African American race (OR 0.513, 95% CI 0.443-0.605; p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.681, 95% CI 0.612-0.758; p < 0.001), and other races (OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.689-0.903; p = 0.006) had lower surgical treatment odds compared with the White population. Medicaid/Medicare was associated with lower surgical treatment odds than private/commercial insurance (OR 0.603, 0.554-0.657; p < 0.001). Interaction analysis revealed that African American (OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.569-0.880; p = 0.001) and Hispanic (OR 0.671, 95% CI 0.556-0.809; p < 0.001) populations with private insurance had lower surgical treatment odds than White populations with private insurance. Similarly, African American patients, Hispanic patients, and patients of other races with nonprivate insurance also had lower surgical treatment odds than their White counterparts after adjusting for all other covariates. Based on the KID, African American and Hispanic populations had lower surgical treatment rates than their White counterparts, with higher utilization of the ED for pediatric medically intractable epilepsy.

Māori experiences of hospital care: a qualitative systematic review

Indigenous experiences of hospitalisation may contribute to maintenance of Indigenous health inequities. We undertook a qualitative systematic review of Māori experiences of hospital care within New Zealand. We performed electronic database searches and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement to assist study selection. We were guided by Kaupapa Māori (Māori centred) research methodology and used the CONSolIDated critERtia statement to evaluate completeness of reporting against recommended Indigenous ethical guidelines. The Betancourt framework for addressing ethnic disparities in health care was utilised to synthesise findings. Seven studies were included. Studies enlisting Indigenous research expertise and Kaupapa Māori research methodology demonstrated clearer links between participant voices and critique of hospital experiences. Multiple barriers were identified within clinical, organisational and structural loci of practice. Proposed interventions focused on building cultural safety against these barriers. Strategies promoting access to care for Māori and cultural safety training for the workforce are needed.

Racial differences in transfusion practices: Time to address structural racism

See article on page 1519–1526, in this issue

Strategies for Cardio-Oncology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose of reviewThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare and has disproportionately affected the marginalized populations. Patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease (cardio-oncology population) are uniquely affected. In this review, we explore the current data on COVID-19 vulnerability and outcomes in these patients and discuss strategies for cardio-oncology care with a focus on healthcare innovation, health equity, and inclusion.Recent findingsThe growing evidence suggest increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with comorbid cancer and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, de novo cardiovascular complications such as myocarditis, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, heart failure, and thromboembolic events have increasingly emerged, possibly due to an accentuated host immune response and cytokine release syndrome.SummaryPatient-centric policies are helpful for cardio-oncology surveillance like remote monitoring, increased use of biomarker-based surveillance, imaging modalities like CT scan, and point-of-care ultrasound to minimize the exposure for high-risk patients. Abundant prior experience in cancer therapy scaffolded the repurposed use of corticosteroids, IL-6 inhibitors, and Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 vaccine timing and dose frequency present a challenge due to overlapping toxicities and immune cell depletion in patients receiving cancer therapies. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic laid bare social and ethnic disparities in healthcare but also steered in innovation to combat problems of patient outreach, particularly with virtual care. In the recovery phase, the backlog in cardio-oncology care, interplay of cancer therapy-related side effects, and long COVID-19 syndrome are crucial issues to address.

Abstract 225: Hispanics And Chest Pain: An Opportunity To Address Healthcare Disparities In A Residency Training Program

Background: Racial and ethnic healthcare disparities contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in cardiovascular disease. As one of the primary reasons for emergency department (ED) presentation, rapid assessment of patients with chest pain is necessary to guide further intervention and disposition. However, even with continued efforts to achieve health equity and eliminate disparities, Hispanics continue to face significant barriers to healthcare. Our goal was to assess the characteristics, and disposition, of Hispanic patients presenting to the ED with chest pain to identify potential targets for intervention to improve healthcare delivery. Methods: Data was obtained from the electronic medical record warehouse of a large, safety-net, academic hospital from January to December 2020. Patients who presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of “chest pain” were identified and medical records were reviewed. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify the relationship between Hispanic ethnicity and ED disposition. Results: Hispanic patients who presented with chest pain represented only 4.78% (530 of 11095). Hispanics were of younger age (43.4 vs 48.5) and had lower BP (128.8/77.8 vs 134.5/81.5), but were 2.93 times more likely to be uninsured (2.44-3.51, 95% CI, p&lt;0.05). Hispanic females were 1.58 more likely to present with chest pain (1.32-1.88, 95% CI, p&lt;0.05). Although Hispanics were admitted more often (17.74 vs 16.79%), overall disposition from the ED (admit to inpatient, observation, discharge) was 1.39 times longer for this ethnic group (99.0 vs 71.0 min, p&lt;0.05). Disposition for admitted Hispanics took 1.98 times longer, (86.0 vs 43.5 min, p&lt;0.05). Discussion: Our study suggests that Hispanics with chest pain may experience delays in triage and disposition from the ED. Contributing factors may be due to higher prevalence of undocumented status, lack of insurance, language barriers, and a lack of Hispanic providers who promote healthcare equity. Our next steps are to begin a focused educational program for residents to demonstrate that physician driven interventions are an effective way to promote the elimination of racial and ethnic healthcare disparities.

Sex, gender, race and ethnicity matter in limb preservation in North America

The causes of sex, gender, racial and ethnic disparities in health care are multifactorial and reflect differences in biological vulnerability to disease as well as differences in social resources, environmental conditions and health-care interventions. These factors are well known to influence the fate of people with diabetes-related foot complications such as diabetic foot ulcer, infection and amputation. In this paper, the authors discuss the important concepts of health equity, equality and disparity in relation to the impact of sex, gender, race and ethnicity on limb preservation.