Genetically-based diseases with a late onset, such as BRCA1-dependent breast cancer or Huntington's disease, can be predicted by the screening of relevant mutations in members of high-risk families. Genetic screening is characterized by a conflict between respect for autonomy--e.g., the 'right not to know'--and responsibility toward future generations (the 'duty to know' for the sake of one's descendants). Other ethical conflicts are related to uncertainty as to benefits deriving from screening for mutations, since for most conditions no clearly effective therapeutical strategy has as yet been defined. In addition to monogenic high-penetrance conditions, polygenic low-penetrance susceptibility is attracting increasing attention, in particular with respect to environmental-genetic interactions (metabolic polymorphisms). A simple approach to genetic screening would be to weigh the benefits and costs of genetic screening against those of primary prevention, and a superficial conclusion might be that genetic screening is less expensive and, overall, more practicable than restriction of toxic exposures or other known risk factors for the disease. Economic advantage notwithstanding, however, giving precedence to screening over primary prevention would be unacceptable. A serious hazard of genetic screening is the implicit limitation of research efforts aimed at primary prevention, and a serious drawback is its potential application for selection of nonsusceptible employees. The principle of equity is easily violated by genetic screening of workers in view of the fact that genetically-based metabolic polymorphisms are distributed unevenly among different ethnic groups.
Read full abstract
Jan 1, 1999
Xin-He Hu 
Open Access
