Ethanol's Discriminative Stimulus Research Articles

Cross-Species Translational Findings in the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Ethanol.

The progress on understanding the pharmacological basis of ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects has been substantial, but appears to have plateaued in the past decade. Further, the cross-species translational efforts are clear in laboratory animals, but have been minimal in human subject studies. Research findings clearly demonstrate that ethanol produces a compound stimulus with primary activity through GABA and glutamate receptor systems, particularly ionotropic receptors, with additional contribution from serotonergic mechanisms. Further progress should capitalize on chemogenetic and optogenetic techniques in laboratory animals to identify the neural circuitry involved in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. These infrahuman studies can be guided by in vivo imaging of human brain circuitry mediating ethanol's subjective effects. Ultimately, identifying receptors systems, as well as where they are located within brain circuitry, will transform the use of drug discrimination procedures to help identify possible treatment or prevention strategies for alcohol use disorder.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, pregnanolone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in rats administered ethanol or saline as adolescents

Adolescent alcohol use may produce long-term changes in the receptors and neurosteroids that putatively mediate alcohol's effects and consequently contribute to alcohol abuse and dependence as an adult. To test this possibility, ethanol (0.18–1.8 g/kg) and two neurosteroids, pregnanolone (1–10 mg/kg) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 1–100 mg/kg), were administered alone and in combination to adult, male Long–Evans rats discriminating 1 g/kg ethanol (15% v/v) under a fixed ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation after adolescent treatment with 15 injections of ethanol ( n = 9, 2 g/kg, 20% v/v) or saline ( n = 7). When compared as adults, ethanol-treated adolescents (as opposed to saline-treated adolescents) had higher percentages of ethanol-lever responding at doses smaller than the training dose, and higher response rates after both control and ethanol injections. Neither pregnanolone nor DHEA substituted for ethanol in either adolescent-treated group up to doses that substantially decreased response rates. When administered with ethanol, 1 and 3.2 mg/kg of pregnanolone enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses more in saline-treated adolescents than in ethanol-treated adolescents. Unlike pregnanolone, 32 and 100 mg/kg of DHEA attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol modestly in both adolescent-treated groups. These results in adult rats suggest that adolescent ethanol administration can enhance the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses and affect the capacity of pregnanolone, but not DHEA, to interact with ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects.

Ethanol-induced alterations of c-Fos immunoreactivity in specific limbic brain regions following ethanol discrimination training

The discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol are functionally regulated by ionotropic GABA A and NMDA receptors in specific limbic brain regions including the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and hippocampus, as determined by microinjection studies. The purpose of the present work was to further investigate potential neural substrates of ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects by examining if ethanol discrimination learning produces changes in brain regional response to ethanol. To accomplish this goal, immunohistochemistry was used to assess the effects of ethanol (2 g/kg) on c-Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR). Comparisons in ethanol-induced Fos-IR were made between a group of rats that was trained to discriminate the stimulus properties of ethanol (2 g/kg, IG) from water (IG) and a drug/behavior-matched control group that did not receive differential reinforcement for lever selection, which precluded acquisition of discriminative stimulus control by ethanol. In some brain regions discrimination training had no effect on ethanol-induced Fos-IR changes (caudate putamen, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and CA1 region of the hippocampus). In contrast, discrimination training altered the pattern of ethanol-induced Fos-IR in the nucleus accumbens (core), medial septum, and the hippocampus (dentate and CA3). These results indicate that having behavior under the stimulus control of ethanol can change ethanol-induced Fos-IR in some brain regions. This suggests that learning about the subjective properties of ethanol produces adaptive changes in how the brain responds to acute ethanol exposure.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: lack of interaction with taurine.

Recent microdialysis studies showed that ethanol administration increases the release of taurine in various rat brain regions, and it was suggested that this increase in extracellular concentrations of taurine might mediate some of the neurochemical effects of ethanol. Previous drug discrimination studies showed that positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor consistently substituted for ethanol discriminative stimulus effects. Since taurine is also believed to modulate GABA(A) receptor activity, this study addressed the hypothesis that taurine mediates the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol due to GABA(A) activation. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate water from either 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol. In a first experiment, various taurine doses (0-500 mg/kg) were tested to investigate whether taurine substitutes for ethanol. In a second experiment, rats were pretreated with either 500 mg/kg taurine or an equivalent volume of saline before testing for ethanol discrimination with various ethanol doses (0-2.0 g/kg). The results showed that taurine does not substitute for ethanol at any tested doses. In addition, taurine pretreatments failed to modify the dose-response curve for ethanol discrimination. These results demonstrate that taurine is not directly involved in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. It is therefore very unlikely that the brain release of taurine observed after ethanol administration is implicated in the major pharmacological effects of ethanol, i.e. positive modulation of GABA(A) receptor, that mediate its discriminative stimulus effects.

Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Inbred Mice

Background: Two of the most widely used mouse strains for studying the behavioral effects of ethanol are C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice. These strains exhibit marked differences in behavioral and physiological responses to ethanol. The subjective discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol may play a role in ethanol abuse, but the discriminative stimulus profile of ethanol has not been compared in B6 and D2 mice. Examination of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in B6 and D2 mouse strains may enhance our understanding of the relationship between the subjective effects of ethanol and other ethanol-induced behavioral effects. Methods: Twelve adult male C57BL/6J mice and 12 male DBA/2J mice were trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from saline in daily 15 min, milk-reinforced operant sessions. After training, ethanol substitution and response-rate suppression dose response curves were determined for ethanol, midazolam, diazepam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), dizocilpine, and morphine. Results: D2 mice learned the ethanol discrimination significantly more quickly than did B6 mice. Ethanol, midazolam, pregnanolone, and dizocilpine fully substituted for ethanol in both strains. Pentobarbital was more potent in producing ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in D2 than B6 mice. Midazolam and diazepam were significantly more potent in suppressing response rates in D2 than B6 mice. Morphine failed to substitute for ethanol in either strain, but the ED50 for morphine suppression of responding was significantly lower in B6 than D2 mice. Conclusions: The initial stimulus effects of 1.5 g/kg ethanol may be more salient in D2 than B6 mice. This does not appear to result from differences in the neurotransmitter systems that mediate ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. In both strains, γ-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist substituted for ethanol. However, strain differences did exist in the potency of γ-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and morphine for suppressing operant responding.

Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Ethanol in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Inbred Mice

Two of the most widely used mouse strains for studying the behavioral effects of ethanol are C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice. These strains exhibit marked differences in behavioral and physiological responses to ethanol. The subjective discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol may play a role in ethanol abuse, but the discriminative stimulus profile of ethanol has not been compared in B6 and D2 mice. Examination of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in B6 and D2 mouse strains may enhance our understanding of the relationship between the subjective effects of ethanol and other ethanol-induced behavioral effects. Twelve adult male C57BL/6J mice and 12 male DBA/2J mice were trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from saline in daily 15 min, milk-reinforced operant sessions. After training, ethanol substitution and response-rate suppression dose response curves were determined for ethanol, midazolam, diazepam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), dizocilpine, and morphine. D2 mice learned the ethanol discrimination significantly more quickly than did B6 mice. Ethanol, midazolam, pregnanolone, and dizocilpine fully substituted for ethanol in both strains. Pentobarbital was more potent in producing ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in D2 than B6 mice. Midazolam and diazepam were significantly more potent in suppressing response rates in D2 than B6 mice. Morphine failed to substitute for ethanol in either strain, but the ED50 for morphine suppression of responding was significantly lower in B6 than D2 mice. The initial stimulus effects of 1.5 g/kg ethanol may be more salient in D2 than B6 mice. This does not appear to result from differences in the neurotransmitter systems that mediate ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. In both strains, gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist substituted for ethanol. However, strain differences did exist in the potency of gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and morphine for suppressing operant responding.

Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl- D-aspartate ligands under different ethanol training conditions in the cynomolgus monkey ( Macaca fascicularis).

The current study was designed to extend our knowledge of the N-methyl- D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor system in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in non-human primates. To characterize the discriminative stimulus effects of the NMDA uncompetitive antagonists dizocilpine, phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine in male and female monkeys under different ethanol training conditions. Adult male ( n=8) and female ( n=9) cynomolgus monkeys ( Macaca fascicularis) were divided into four groups and trained to discriminate 1.0 g/kg ethanol ( n=8) versus water or 2.0 g/kg ethanol ( n=9) versus water in a 2 x 2 design with training dose and sex as main group factors. Ethanol (20% w/v) solutions were administered intragastrically (IG) and responding was maintained under a fixed ratio schedule of food reinforcement. Dose-response determinations for dizocilpine [IG and intramuscular (IM)], PCP (IM) and ketamine (IM) were made under two training intervals (30 and 60 min). Dizocilpine, PCP and ketamine dose-dependently substituted for ethanol in three of four training conditions, the notable exception being in males trained with 2.0 g/kg ethanol. Ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects were greater with IM dizocilpine than with IG dizocilpine. At the lower ethanol training dose (1.0 g/kg), there were no sex differences in the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of dizocilpine, PCP or ketamine, nor were there sex differences in the potencies to produce ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects. Sex differences were readily apparent with the higher ethanol training dose (2.0 g/kg), with the NMDA ligands failing to substitute for ethanol in male monkeys, probably due to the rate-suppressive effects of these compounds. These data suggest that NMDA receptor-mediated activity is a component to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in male and female nonhuman primates. However, NMDA uncompetitive antagonists were less likely to produce discriminative stimulus effects similar to a high ethanol training dose in male monkeys. In comparison to consistent substitution by GABA(A) positive modulators for ethanol, substitution patterns produced by NMDA uncompetitive antagonists suggest a less robust mediation of the ethanol discriminative stimulus through NMDA receptor systems in nonhuman primates.

5-HT 3 receptor antagonist ICS 205-930 alters the discriminative effects of ethanol

The ability of a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT 3) receptor antagonist, ICS 205-930 (3-tropanyl-indole-1-carboxylate, tropisetron), to block the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol was investigated in rats that were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.25 g/kg ip) from saline with food as the reinforcement. Prior administration of ICS 205-930, at the dose of 0.01 mg/kg, significantly decreased ethanol's discriminative stimulus effect at ED 75 dose of ethanol, while higher doses of ICS 205-930 (10 and 17 mg/kg) showed enhancement of ethanol's discriminative effects at ED 0, ED 25, and ED 50 doses of ethanol. Under conditions where ICS 205-930 (10, 17 mg/kg) was tested alone, rats responded exclusively on the saline-appropriate lever. These effects occurred without significantly altering response rates or blood ethanol concentrations. The results suggest that the 5-HT 3 antagonist ICS 205-930 at lower concentration decreases, and at higher concentration enhances the discriminative stimulus effects associated with a lower to moderate dose of ethanol.

Opiate Delta-2-Receptor Antagonist Naltriben Does Not Alter Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Ethanol

The ability of a selective 2-opiate receptor antagonist, naltriben, to modulate ethanol discrimination was investigated in a rat model using a drug discrimination procedure. Rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.25 g/kg, IP) from saline on a fixed-ratio schedule, FR10. Once rats had acquired the ethanol-saline discrimination, ethanol dose–response tests were conducted with 15-min pretest injections. Following the characterization of the ethanol dose-response curve, the effect of naltriben on ethanol's discriminative stimulus was assessed by administering naltriben (0.032–5.6 mg/kg, IP) 15 min before the ethanol administration. In the present study, naltriben did not have any modulatory effect on ethanol discrimination, suggesting that either Δ 2-opiate receptors are not involved in the formation of ethanol's discriminative stimulus or the antagonism of Δ 2-opiate receptors is not sufficient to alter ethanol's compound discriminative stimulus.

Lack of difference between HAD and LAD rats in the stimulus generalization of ethanol to nicotine.

High alcohol drinking (HAD) and low alcohol drinking (LAD) rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 g/kg ethanol from saline. HAD and LAD rats learned the discrimination at the same rate and to the same level of asymptotic performance. In substitution tests, increasing doses of ethanol produced increased responding on the ethanol lever with dose-effect curves that were very similar in HAD and LAD rats. There was no generalization from ethanol to nicotine, or d-amphetamine, in either HAD or LAD rats. These data may be contrasted with data obtained with alcohol preferring rats (P rats) and alcohol non-preferring rats (NP rats), where the ethanol discrimination was learned more rapidly, asymptotic performance was better in P than in NP rats, and ethanol discriminative stimulus generalized to nicotine and partially to d-amphetamine in P, but not in NP rats. These data suggest that the differences in ethanol consumption reported previously by P and HAD rats relative to NP and LAD rats is not necessarily related to strain differences in ethanol discrimination as the differences in ethanol discrimination previously observed between P and NP rats do not occur in HAD and LAD rats.

Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Ethanol: Neuropharmacological Characterization

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to l.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA–mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA A–benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA–benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT 1B/2C agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA–benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT 3 receptor agonists ( m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA A receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

The discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are mediated by NMDA and GABA(A) receptors in specific limbic brain regions.

This study was conducted to assess the involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor systems, located in specific limbic brain regions. in the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate between intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of ethanol (1 g/kg) and saline on a two-lever drug discrimination task. The rats were then implanted with bilateral injector guides aimed at the nucleus accumbens core (AcbC), prelimbic cortex (PrLC), hippocampus area CA1 (CA1), or extended amygdala (i.e., at the border of the central and basolateral nuclei). Infusions of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK 801 in the AcbC or CA1 resulted in dose-dependent full substitution for i.p. ethanol. MK 801 infusion in the PrLC or amygdala failed to substitute for ethanol. Injection of the competitive NMDA antagonist CPP in the AcbC also failed to substitute for ethanol. Co-infusion of MK 801 in the hippocampus potentiated the effects of MK 801 in the AcbC, whereas NMDA infusion in the hippocampus attenuated the ability of MK 801 in the AcbC to substitute for ethanol. The direct GABA(A) agonist muscimol resulted in dose-dependent full substitution for i.p. ethanol when it was injected into the AcbC or amygdala, but failed to substitute when administered in the PrLC. Co-infusion of MK 801, but not CPP, potentiated the effects of muscimol in the AcbC. These results demonstrate that ethanol's discriminative stimulus function is mediated centrally by NMDA and GABA(A) receptors located in specific limbic brain regions. The data also suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are mediated by interactions between ionotropic GABA(A) and NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens, and by interactions among brain regions.

Discriminative stimulus function of ethanol: role of GABAA receptors in the nucleus accumbens.

Because the subjective effects of drugs may be related to abuse potential, this study was conducted to assess the involvement of GABAA receptor systems in the nucleus accumbens (N Acc) in the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate between intraperitoneal (IP) injections of ethanol (1 g/kg) and saline under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of sucrose (10% w/v) reinforcement. When performance during training sessions met the accuracy criteria (> 80% correct responding for five consecutive days), an ethanol generalization curve was determined. The rats were then surgically implanted with bilateral stainless-steel guide cannulae aimed at the N Acc. Intra-accumbens (IA) substitution test sessions were conducted during which the direct GABAA agonist muscimol (0.01, 0.04, 0.10, and 0.40 micrograms/microliter; IA) was administered in combination with saline (IP). The direct GABAA antagonist bicuculline (0.03, 0.10, and 0.30 micrograms/microliter; IA) was administered in combination with the training dose of ethanol (1 g/kg, ip). At 10-min postinjection, IA muscimol partially substituted for IP ethanol. However, at 15-min postinjection, muscimol (0.10 microgram/microliter; IA) fully substituted for IP ethanol. Bicuculline attenuated the discriminative stimulus properties of IP ethanol, but only at doses that significantly decreased response rate. At 10-min postinjection, muscimol (0.01 and 0.04 micrograms/microliter) potentiated (> 80% ethanol lever responding) the discriminative stimulus properties of a dose of ethanol (0.5 g/kg) that alone produced only partial generalization. These data suggest that ethanol discrimination is mediated centrally and demonstrate that infusions of the GABAA agonist muscimol in the N Acc are sufficient to produce the stimulus effects corresponding to a 1.0 g/kg training dose of ethanol. When taken together with data showing that GABAA receptor activation in the N Acc potentiates the termination of ethanol self-administration, these data suggest that ethanol's discriminative stimulus function may influence its reinforcement function.

The influence of opioid antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of different endogenous opioid systems in the expression of ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects in a two-lever operant drug discrimination paradigm. Wistar rats were trained to make differential responses following the administration of ethanol (1 g/kg, IP) or saline. The correct response (fixed-ratio schedule; FR10) resulted in the presentation of food. Once rats had acquired the discrimination an ethanol dose-response test was conducted. The effects of opioid antagonists on the discrimination were assessed by administering the μ-opioid receptor antagonists naloxone (0.5–20 mg/kg SC) and cyprodime (5–100 mg/kg SC) and the δ-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (0.1–25 mg/kg SC) 15–30 min before the discrimination test. Furthermore, the selective κ-opioid antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg SC) given 24 h before the test session was examined. Results of generalization testing demonstrate that ethanol discrimination was dose dependent. Pretreatment with naloxone produced only at the highest dose a partial, but significant, antagonism, whereas cyprodime failed to alter the ethanol cue. This suggested the involvement of other opioid receptor subtypes. However, neither naltrindole nor nor-binaltorphimine had any effect on the ethanol-saline discrimination. These results demonstrate that the expression of the ethanol cue is only partly dependent on the function of endogenous opioid systems.

Blockade of ethanol discrimination by isradipine

The effect of the dihydropyridine Ca 2+ channel antagonist, isradipine, on ethanol discrimination was assessed in rats trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from water in a T-maze, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. Pretreatment with isradipine (0, 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg i.p.) resulted in a dose-dependent blockade of ethanol discrimination. The results of the present study suggest that L-type Ca 2+ channels are involved in the mediation of ethanol discriminative stimulus effects.

Comparison of the discriminative stimulus function of ethanol following intracranial and systematic administration: Evidence of a central mechanism

Rats were trained using a two-lever drug discrimination procedure to press one lever following systemic administration of ethanol (1.0 mg/kg, IP) and another lever following IP injections of saline. After determination of an ethanol generalization curve (0.25–1.25 g/ kg, IP), rats were surgically implanted with bilateral stainless steel guide cannulae that terminated in the lateral ventricles. Following surgery, the generalization curve was redetermined and did not differ from presurgery values. Then, generalization to bilateral intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of ethanol (600.0 and 900.0 mM, 1.0 μl/side) were administered alone and in combination with IP injections of ethanol. The ICV ethanol injections produced partial generalization, but the combination of ICV ethanol (600.0 and 900.0 mM) with IP ethanol (0.25 and 0.50 g/kg) injections were two- to threefold more potent then IP injections alone. Response rates were unaffected by any dose of ethanol tested. These data suggest central mediation of ethanol's discriminative stimulus function due to: 1) increased potency of systemically administered ethanol by centrally administered ethanol, and 2) partial generalization between centrally and peripherally administered ethanol.

Blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists

The ability of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to block the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol was investigated in pigeons trained with food reinforcement to discriminate ethanol (1.5 g/kg; IG) from water. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists that are substituted tropines, ICS 205-930 (0.1-0.56 mg/kg) and MDL 72222 (3.0-17.0 mg/kg), blocked ethanol-appropriate responding, in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that some of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are mediated via the 5-HT3 receptor. The blockade the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol occurred in the presence of approximately 25-40 mM blood ethanol levels. Furthermore, the ethanol dose-effect function was shifted to the right by increasing doses of MDL 72222, suggesting a surmountable antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. However, the benzamide zacopride (0.56-1.7 mg/kg), which is also a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, did not block the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. In addition, the dopaminergic antagonist haloperidol and the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin also failed to block the ethanol discrimination. The results suggest that 5-HT3 mediated neurotransmission is an important component of ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects, but that the structural characteristics of the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists influence their ability to block this action of ethanol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)