Estrogen-only Therapy Research Articles

Hormone replacement therapy and the incidence and prevalence of breast cancer: an integrative review

The objective of this study was to carry out an integrative review an integrative review to analyze the incidence and prevalence of breast cancer after hormone replacement therapy. This integrative review followed several steps, including identifying the topic, structuring the research question using the PICO strategy, defining inclusion criteria, selecting articles, evaluating and analyzing selected studies, interpreting the results and presenting the review. The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is linked to a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, especially with combination therapy. The risk increases with time of use and persists after discontinuation. Although some studies have found a significant risk, estrogen-only therapy carries a lower risk, particularly for long-term use. Hormone replacement therapy, especially the combined formulation of estrogen and progestogen, is associated with a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer, persisting after discontinuation. The estrogen-only formulation has a lower risk. The duration of HRT and body mass index (BMI) also influence the risk.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of menopause hormone therapy on cognition.

Despite evidence from preclinical studies suggesting estrogen's neuroprotective effects, the use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) to support cognitive function remains controversial. We used random-effect meta-analysis and multi-level meta-regression to derive pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) from 34 randomized controlled trials, including 14,914 treated and 12,679 placebo participants. Associations between MHT and cognitive function in some domains and tests of interest varied by formulation and treatment timing. While MHT had no overall effects on cognitive domain scores, treatment for surgical menopause, mostly estrogen-only therapy, improved global cognition (SMD=1.575, 95% CI 0.228, 2.921; P=0.043) compared to placebo. When initiated specifically in midlife or close to menopause onset, estrogen therapy was associated with improved verbal memory (SMD=0.394, 95% CI 0.014, 0.774; P=0.046), while late-life initiation had no effects. Overall, estrogen-progestogen therapy for spontaneous menopause was associated with a decline in Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores as compared to placebo, with most studies administering treatment in a late-life population (SMD=-1.853, 95% CI -2.974, -0.733; P = 0.030). In analysis of timing of initiation, estrogen-progestogen therapy had no significant effects in midlife but was associated with improved verbal memory in late-life (P = 0.049). Duration of treatment >1 year was associated with worsening in visual memory as compared to shorter duration. Analysis of individual cognitive tests yielded more variable results of positive and negative effects associated with MHT. These findings suggest time-dependent effects of MHT on certain aspects of cognition, with variations based on formulation and timing of initiation, underscoring the need for further research with larger samples and more homogeneous study designs.

Dementia in Women Using Estrogen-Only Therapy

This study examines the association between use of estrogen-only therapy for perimenopausal and menopausal women and risk of dementia.

Relationship between menopausal hormone therapy and incidence of fractures in postmenopausal women

Objective Long-term protective effects of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) at fractures with different doses and components are controversial. We analyzed the effect of MHT on the incidence of spine and femur fractures according to MHT type, age at commencement, duration and dose of hormones in Korean women. Method This retrospective study evaluated propensity score-matched patients with MHT from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Among women aged ≥50 years with menopause between 2004 and 2007, spine and femur fracture incidence until 2017 was analyzed in 36,446 women who had received MHT for >1 year. Estrogen–progesterone therapy (EPT), estrogen-only therapy (ET) or tibolone therapy was conducted. Results EPT significantly lowered the incidence of spine and femur fractures with a conventional dose, but not with a low dose. Tibolone significantly decreased the incidence of spine fractures in women aged 50–59 years when used for >5 years, and the incidence of femur fractures in women older than 60 years when used for >3 years. ET significantly lowered the risk of femur fractures when estradiol was used for >5 years. Conclusion In menopausal women, all MHT including conventional-dose EPT, ET and tibolone tended to lower the incidence of fractures. The effects, however, varied with the type of fracture and type of MHT.

Lifestyle and personal factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreductive surgery

ObjectiveThe presence of macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is an important factor influencing survival for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). More research is needed to identify factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed 12 lifestyle and personal exposures known to be related to ovarian cancer risk or inflammation to identify those associated with having residual disease after surgery. MethodsThis analysis used data on 2054 patients with advanced stage HGSC from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The exposures were body mass index, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use, endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, incomplete pregnancy, menopausal hormone therapy use, menopausal status, parity, smoking, and tubal ligation. Logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between these exposures and having residual disease following PCS. ResultsMenopausal estrogen-only therapy (ET) use was associated with 33% lower odds of having macroscopic residual disease compared to never use (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.46–0.97, p = 0.033). Compared to nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had 36% lower odds of having residual disease (OR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.43–0.94, p = 0.022), while there was no association among parous women who breastfed (OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.65–1.25, p = 0.53). ConclusionsThe association between ET and having no macroscopic residual disease is plausible given a strong underlying biologic hypothesis between this exposure and diagnosis with HGSC. If this or the parity finding is replicated, these factors could be included in risk stratification models to determine whether HGSC patients should receive PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Association between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Frailty: Cross-Sectional Study Using National Survey Data in Korea.

Frailty is a multidimensional clinical syndrome that increases the risk of adverse health outcomes. Previous studies have reported a close link between menopause and frailty. Combined estrogen-progestin therapy (or estrogen-only therapy in women who have undergone a hysterectomy) is currently approved as a menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) to treat menopausal symptoms. Despite increasing evidence of the importance of sex hormones in the development of frailty, very few studies have investigated the association between MHT and frailty. A cross-sectional evaluation was conducted using population-based survey data known as the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV-V, 2008-2012). The KNHANES data provided variables that were used to construct a 51-item frailty index (FI). The number of study population, only including postmenopausal women, was 7823 women, and their mean age was 62.51 years (range 32-80 years). Approximately 40% of them had graduated from middle school or higher, 45% lived in metropolitan statistical areas, and 5% were recipients of the national Medical Aid. The mean age at menopause was 48.66 years (range 30-62 years). Overall, the mean FI value was 0.15, and the prevalence of MHT was 13.23%. Findings from multiple regression analysis using the inverse probability of treatment weighting showed that a treatment duration of more than 2 years and up to 5 years, age at first treatment between 50 and 59 years, and MHT initiation 3 to 6 years after menopause were all negatively associated with frailty (p < 0.05). Further studies are needed to confirm these findings using prospective data.

Effects of risk factors for ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis

To evaluate the associations between 10 well-established ovarian cancer risk factors and risk of ovarian cancer among women with vs. without endometriosis. Pooled analysis of 9 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Population-based. We included 8,500 women with ovarian cancer, 13,592 control women. Ten well-established ovarian cancer risk factors. Risk of ovarian cancer for women with and without endometriosis. Most risk factor-ovarian cancer associations were similar when comparing women with and without endometriosis, and no interactions were statistically significant. However, body mass index (BMI) 25-<30 kg/m2 was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk among women with endometriosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.60), but not associated with the risk among women without endometriosis (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05) when compared with BMI 18.5-<25 kg/m2; anincreased risk was observed for a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, although there was little difference comparing women with endometriosis (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.94-1.57) to women without (OR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22) (P-interaction = .51). Genital talcum powder use and long-term menopausal estrogen-only therapy use showed increased ovarian cancer risk, but risk appeared greater for those with endometriosis vs. those without (genital talcum powder: OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.84 vs. OR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25, respectively; ≥10 years of estrogen-only therapy: OR = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.09-3.24 vs. OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.76, respectively); neither of these interactions were statistically significant (P-interaction = .65 and P-interaction = .96, respectively). The associations between ovarian cancer and most risk factors were similar among women with and without endometriosis. However, there was some suggestion of differences by endometriosis status for BMI, menopausal hormone therapy use, and genital talcum powder use, highlighting the complexity of ovarian cancer etiology.

Association of hormone replacement therapy with risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used to relieve menopausal symptoms; however, it remains unclear whether the use of HRT was associated with gastric cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available evidence. This study followed the PRISMA guideline to report meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from conception through 23 February 2022. Eligible studies reporting risk of gastric cancer after HRT were screened and accessed by two independent reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled risk estimate as relative risk (RR, 95% CI). Pre-established review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281260). Among the 1095 articles identified, we included 11 studies with 1,919,089 women in this meta-analysis. The combined risk estimate (RR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.64–0.81; I2 = 2%) indicated that the use of HRT was associated with a 28% reduction in risk of gastric cancer compared with those who had no HRT exposure. The narrow prediction interval (0.62–0.84) for gastric cancer risk suggested a low between-study variance. In subgroup analysis defined by HRT formulation, there were reduction in risks of gastric cancer after the use of estrogen-only therapy (Pooled RR, 0.63; 95% CI 0.51–0.77, I2 = 0%) and estrogen-progestin therapy (Pooled RR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.57–0.87; I2 = 0%), as compared with non-users. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of HRT was associated with a reduced gastric cancer risk regardless of HRT formulation. Further investigations are warranted to confirm underlying mechanisms.

Relationship between the type of hormone replacement therapy and incidence of breast cancer in Korea

Objective This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) types and breast cancer (BC) incidence in postmenopausal women in Korea. Methods The nested case–control study used data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Among the women aged ≥50 years who menopaused between 2004 and 2007, BC incidence up to 2017 was analyzed in 36,446 women using or having used HRT for >1 year and in 36,446 women who did not use any HRT for more than 1 year. HRT types and duration were classified into three categories. Results BC risk (BCR) decreased with tibolone use for all ages. With HRT initiation in women aged ≥50 years, BCR was lower with tibolone and estrogen–progestogen therapy. HRT for <3 years showed lower BCR with tibolone, while higher BCR was observed with estrogen-only therapy. BCR was lower in women of all ages on HRT for >5 years than in the control group. Conclusions For women in their 50s, tibolone use lowers BCR; for all ages, the use of any HRT for >5 years showed lower BCR in Korea. These divergent results from western countries could be associated with the specific characteristics of BC in Korea.

Menopausal hormonal therapy in surgically menopausal women with underlying endometriosis

Objective This study aimed to investigate the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and endometriosis recurrence in women who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to treat endometriosis. Method This retrospective cohort study included 330 women who underwent definitive surgery to treat endometriosis during 1996–2012. Follow-up data until December 2018 were analyzed. Patients were grouped as MHT non-users (non-MHT, n = 43), estrogen-only therapy (ET, n = 230), estrogen–progestogen therapy (EPT, n = 39) and tibolone (n = 18). Results The mean age at surgery was 41.5 ± 5.3 years. The overall median follow-up duration was 6.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.0–10.4), and the median duration of MHT use was 66.0 months (IQR: 36.0–116.3). The overall recurrence rate was 3.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.5–5.5) and there was no significant difference in recurrence among the study groups. Disease recurrence resolved after MHT discontinuation, or change in MHT type and/or dose. Conclusions No significant association between MHT use and endometriosis recurrence was found in this study. The endometriosis recurrence rate was non-significantly different between ET and EPT. Recurrent endometriosis can be successfully treated without invasive measures. No study patients had malignant transformation after a median follow-up of 6 years. Our findings suggest that any of the three evaluated MHT regimens can be used in surgically menopausal Thai women with underlying endometriosis.

Endometriosis and menopausal hormone therapy impact the hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer, and to understand how hormone therapy (HT) use and endometriosis affect this association. MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of self-reported data from 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Women with (n = 5350) and without ovarian cancer (n = 7544) who never used HT or exclusively used either estrogen-only therapy (ET) or estrogen+progestin therapy (EPT) were included. Risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer adjusted for duration of ET and EPT use and stratified on history of endometriosis was determined using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsOverall and among women without endometriosis, there was a positive association between ovarian cancer risk and hysterectomy (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.31 and OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09–1.32, respectively), but no association upon adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94–1.16 and OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95–1.18, respectively). Among women with a history of endometriosis, there was a slight inverse association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.69–1.26), but this association became stronger and statistically significant after adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.48–0.99). ConclusionsThe hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association is complex and cannot be understood without considering duration of ET and EPT use and history of endometriosis. Failure to take these exposures into account in prior studies casts doubt on their conclusions. Overall, hysterectomy is not risk-reducing for ovarian cancer, however the inverse association among women with endometriosis warrants further investigation.

Abstract 818: Association of polygenic risk score and menopausal hormone therapy for colorectal cancer risk

Abstract Background and objective Genetic predisposition and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) are established risk and preventive factors for colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. We aimed to evaluate the joint associations of a polygenic risk score (PRS) and MHT on CRC risk for informing CRC prevention. Methods We used data from 28,486 postmenopausal women (11,519 cases and 16,967 controls) of European descent from 38 studies. MHT use was assessed as the use of any MHT, estrogen-only (E-only) or combined estrogen-progestogen (E+P) therapy at reference time. A PRS based on 141 genetic variants previously identified by genome-wide association studies of CRC was modelled as categorical variable in quartiles and also as per-standard deviation difference between PRS and minimum of PRS [(PRS-min(PRS))/SD(PRS)] (PRS.minsd). Multiplicative interaction between PRS and MHT was evaluated using standard logistic regression. Additive interaction was measured using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Results The use of any MHT as well as E+P and E-only were associated with reduced CRC risk (Odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 0.71, 0.65, respectively). PRS was associated with increased CRC risk, whether as continuous variable (PRS.minsd) (OR 1.53) or in quartiles (OR 1.49, 1.92, 2.87, respectively). We identified statistically significant negative multiplicative interaction (OR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.87, 0.98) as well as negative additive interaction (RERI: -0.13; 95%CI: -0.15, -0.10) between PRS.minsd and any MHT use. Results were limited to additive interactions with PRS.minsd for E-only use (RERI: -0.14; 95%CI: -0.18, -0.11) and E+P use (RERI: -0.12; 95%CI: -0.16, -0.08). The magnitude of negative additive interactions increased with higher quartiles of PRS for all MHT variables and was consistently significant for the highest quartile compared to the lowest quartile of PRS for any MHT use (RERI: -0.78; 95%CI: -1.03, -0.52), E-only use (RERI: -0.78; 95%CI: -1.18, -0.39), and also E+P use (RERI: -0.53; 95%CI: -0.96, -0.10). Negative multiplicative interaction was also observed for higher PRS quartiles of all MHT variables but significant only for the highest quartile with E-only use (OR: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.55, 0.97). These negative interactions on both multiplicative and additive scales indicate that MHT has a relatively more protective effect on CRC risk for those women with larger PRS scores. For example, compared to women in the lowest PRS quartile with no MHT use, the risk of CRC for women in higher quartiles of PRS was more strongly reduced with MHT use (ORPRS.Q3+noMHT: 1.93 vs ORPRS.Q3+MHT: 1.38, OR MHT/noMHT in PRS.Q3: 0.71; ORPRS.Q4+noMHT: 2.81 vs ORPRS.Q4+MHT: 1.77, OR MHT/noMHT in PRS.Q4: 0.63). Conclusions The protective effect of MHT use on the risk of CRC is stronger in women with higher genetic risk. Risk prediction models incorporating PRS may need to account for potential effect modification by non-genetic risk factors. Citation Format: Yu Tian, Yi Lin, Andre E. Kim, Stephanie A. Bien, Polly A. Newcomb, Graham Casey, Elizabeth A. Platz, Loic Le Marchand, Peter T. Campbell, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister, Feng Guo, Xuechen Chen, Marc J. Gunter, Niki Dimou, Stephen B. Gruber, Andrew T. Chan, Amit D. Joshi, Sonja I. Berndt, Emily White, Victor Moreno, Ross L. Prentice, Ulrike Peters, William Gauderman, Li Hsu, Jenny Chang-Claude. Association of polygenic risk score and menopausal hormone therapy for colorectal cancer risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 818.

Prediagnostic use of estrogen-only therapy is associated with improved colorectal cancer survival in menopausal women: a Swedish population-based cohort study

Background Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) reduces the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), yet it is largely unclear whether it could also influence survival in women with CRC. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of prediagnostic MHT use on CRC-specific and all-cause mortality in women with CRC. Methods This nationwide nested cohort study, within a large population-based matched cohort, included all women diagnosed with incident CRC between January 2006 and December 2012 (N = 7814). A total of 1529 women had received at least one dispensed prescription of systemic MHT before CRC diagnosis, and 6285 CRC women with CRC did not receive MHT during the study period, as ascertained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry. Multivariable Cox regression models provided adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Results Past use of prediagnostic estrogen-only therapy (E-MHT) was associated with lower CRC-specific (HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.44–0.99) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.59–0.93). However, all-cause mortality (HR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.02–1.48) was elevated among current prediagnostic E-MHT users who were 70+ years at diagnosis. Current estrogen combined progestin therapy (EP-MHT) was associated with higher CRC-specific mortality (HR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.06–2.44) in older women, but no association was shown for all-cause mortality. Conclusions Our findings suggest that E-MHT, but not EP-MHT use, might be associated with improved CRC survival, indicating a potential role of estrogens in sex hormone-related cancers. However, association of MHT use with grade of cancer remains unclear.

The Women's Health Initiative trials of menopausal hormone therapy: lessons learned.

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) assessed oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) taken with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for prevention of chronic disease in postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years. Women with an intact uterus (n = 16,608) were randomized to CEE+ MPA therapy or placebo for a median of 5.6 years; women with hysterectomy (n = 10,739) were randomized to CEE-alone therapy or placebo for a median of 7.2 years. Both cohorts have been followed for 18 years. In the overall study population (mean age, 63 y), neither estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) nor estrogen-only therapy prevented coronary heart disease or led to a favorable balance of chronic-disease benefits and risks. Subgroup analyses, however, suggest that timing of hormone therapy (HT) initiation influences the relation between HT and coronary risk, as well as its overall benefit-risk balance, with more favorable effects in women who are younger (age < 60 year) or recently menopausal (within 10 year) than in women who are older or further past the menopausal transition. In younger women who entered the trial of estrogen-only therapy with oophorectomy, the intervention was associated with a significant 32% reduction in all-cause mortality over long-term follow-up. WHI findings indicate important differences in HT-related clinical outcomes by age and time since menopause. Systemic HT has an acceptable safety profile for menopause management when initiated among healthy women who are younger (or recently menopausal) and not at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease or breast cancer. Initiation of treatment in older women who are distant from menopause onset, however, should be avoided. Other HT formulations and routes of delivery warrant further study.(WHI clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00000611).

Estrogen-Only Systemic HT in the Setting of Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy — Safe or Risky?

To clarify the health effects of estrogen-only systemic hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women without a uterus who did or did not undergo

Different menopausal hormone regimens and risk of breast cancer

BackgroundThere are considerable knowledge gaps concerning different estrogen and progestin formulations, regimens, and modes of administration of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and the risk of breast cancer. Our objective was to assess the different treatment options for menopausal HT and the risk of breast cancer. Patients and methodsThis Swedish prospective nationwide cohort study included all women who received ≥1 HT prescription during the study period 2005–2012 (290186 ever-users), group-level matched (1:3) to 870165 never-users; respectively, 6376 (2.2%) and 18754 (2.2%) developed breast cancer. HT, ascertained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, was subdivided by estrogen and progestogen formulation types, regimens (continuous versus sequential) and modes of administration (oral versus transdermal). The risk of invasive breast cancer was presented as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. ResultsCurrent use of estrogen-only therapy was associated with a slight excess breast cancer risk [odds ratio (OR)=1.08 (1.02–1.14)]. The risk for current estrogen plus progestogen therapy was higher [OR=1.77 (1.69–1.85)] and increased with higher age at initiation [OR=3.59 (3.30–3.91) in women 70+ years]. In contrast, past use was associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Current continuous estrogen/progestin use was associated with higher risk [OR=2.18 (1.99–2.40) for progesterone-derived; OR=2.66 (2.49–2.84) for testosterone-derived] than sequential use [OR=1.37 (0.97–1.92) for progesterone-derived; OR=1.12 (0.96–1.30) for testosterone-derived]. The OR for current use was 1.12 (1.04–1.20) for estradiol, 0.76 (0.69–0.84) for estriol, 4.47 (2.67–7.48) for conjugated estrogens, and 1.68 (1.51–1.87) for tibolone. Oral and cutaneous HT showed similar associations. ConclusionDifferent HT regimens have profoundly different effects on breast cancer risk. Because of registry limitations some confounders could not be assessed. This knowledge may guide clinical decision-making when HT is considered.

Risk of venous thromboembolism events in postmenopausal women using oral versus non-oral hormone therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionHormone therapy (HT) is an effective treatment for climacteric symptoms. Nevertheless, combined estrogen-progestin therapy and the oral route seem to entail higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than estrogen-only therapy and transdermal administration. The present study aimed to investigate the risk of thromboembolic events in postmenopausal women using non-oral estrogen compared to women using oral estrogen and control groups (women receiving placebo or non-users of HT), as well as to assess the thrombotic impact of estrogens alone vs. combined estrogen-progestin therapy. Materials and methodsSystematic review of MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov according to PRISMA guidelines. ResultsTwenty-two studies were included in the meta-analyses (9 case-control studies, 9 cohort studies, and 4 randomized controlled trials). As compared to control groups, VTE risk was not increased with non-oral HT, including users of estrogens and estrogens plus progestins (OR 0.97 [0.9–1.06]), non-oral estrogen therapy (ET)-only (OR 0.95 [0.81–1.10]), and non-oral combined estrogen-progestin therapy (OR 0.92 [0.77–1.09]). Conversely, increased risk of VTE was observed as compared with control groups in users of oral HT, including users of estrogens and estrogens plus progestins HT (OR 1.72 [1.47–2.01]), oral ET-only (OR 1.43 [1.34–1.53]), and combined oral estrogen-progestin HT (OR 2.35 [1.9–2.9]). The comparison of non-oral vs. oral HT showed increased VTE risk with oral HT (OR 1.66 [1.39–1.98]). ConclusionsVTE risk was increased in postmenopausal women with no previous thromboembolic events using oral HT. Non-oral HT did not significantly affect this risk. The quality of the evidence produced in our meta-analyses is low to moderate, and further clinical trials are needed to sort out the impact of different types of progestin and different estrogen doses and administration routes on VTE risk.

Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer by histological type and race: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

This meta-analysis investigated the association between the risk of breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Various stratified analyses were performed according to race (Asian/Westerner), HRT type [all hormone therapies, estrogen-only therapy (ET), or combined estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT)], histological breast cancer type (ductal/lobular/mixed ductal-lobular), and estrogen receptor status (ER-positive/ER-negative). A literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, and KoreaMed. Twenty-five epidemiological studies including 23 cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Using a random-effects model, HRT use was found to be positively associated with the risk of breast cancer with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 1.44]. Compared with ET, EPT was more strongly associated with breast cancer risk. EPT was associated with both ductal and lobular breast cancer risks [for ductal breast cancer, HR = 1.51 (95% CI 1.28, 1.78); for lobular breast cancer, HR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.20, 1.60)]. According to ER status, all HRTs were associated with the risk of ER-positive breast cancer, but not with that of ER-negative breast cancer. Asian HRT users had a higher risk of breast cancer than western HRT users. Both ET and EPT were significantly associated with the risk of all breast cancer histological types and ER-positive breast cancer.

Low estrogen doses normalize testosterone and estradiol levels to the female range in transgender women

OBJECTIVE:The ideal dosage of cross-sex hormones remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone, estradiol and prolactin levels after low-dose estrogen therapy with or without cyproterone acetate in transgender women.METHODS:The serum hormone and biochemical profiles of 51 transgender women were evaluated before gonadectomy. Hormone therapy consisted of conjugated equine estrogen alone or combined with cyproterone acetate. The daily dose of conjugated equine estrogen was 0.625 mg in 41 subjects and 1.25 mg in 10 subjects, and the daily dose of cyproterone acetate was 50 mg in 42 subjects and 100 mg in one subject.RESULTS:Estrogen-only therapy reduced the testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels from 731.5 to 18 ng/dL, 6.3 to 1.1 U/L and 9.6 to 1.5 U/L, respectively. Estrogen plus cyproterone acetate reduced the testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels from 750 to 21 ng/dL, 6.8 to 0.6 U/L and 10 to 1.0 U/L, respectively. The serum levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone, estradiol and prolactin in the patients treated with estrogen alone and estrogen plus cyproterone acetate were not significantly different. The group receiving estrogen plus cyproterone acetate had significantly higher levels of gamma-glutamyltransferase than the group receiving estrogen alone. No significant differences in the other biochemical parameters were evident between the patients receiving estrogen alone and estrogen plus cyproterone acetate.CONCLUSION:In our sample of transgender women, lower estrogen doses than those usually prescribed for these subjects were able to adjust the testosterone and estradiol levels to the physiological female range, thus avoiding high estrogen doses and their multiple associated side effects.

Clinical trials in menopause.

Clinical trials in menopause have undergone much scrutiny over the years. This has led to significant shifts in the treatment of symptomatic menopause and a substantial impact on women. We aim to delineate the key studies contributing to this controversy and highlight new directions specifically related to menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and vascular disease risk. We performed a search of sentinel studies delineating the risks and benefits of HT in otherwise healthy postmenopausal women. Using PubMed we input the following search terms: hormone replacement therapy, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, angina, coronary heart calcification, carotid intimal thickness, lipids, and/or lipoproteins. We included studies of menopausal women (surgical or natural) using combined estrogen/progestogen therapy or estrogen-only therapy that looked at cardiovascular disease risk factors or outcomes. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by the authors; however, this is not intended to be a systematic or an exhaustive analysis. In women close to the time of menopause, there is a decreased risk of subclinical and clinical coronary heart disease with menopausal HT. Additionally, HT confers a significant benefit to vasomotor symptoms of menopause, bone health, and colorectal cancer. There is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism with oral formulations that appears mitigated with transdermal estradiol. Mixed data regarding breast cancer risk are available, with some studies suggesting an increased risk of invasive breast cancer with estrogen/progestogen therapy and a null effect with estrogen-only therapy. Other more long-term epidemiologic studies identify a decreased risk. The available literature suggests that HT is a viable option for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Newer trials will likely verify this assessment. If this is enough to change clinical practice, however, remains to be seen given the general fear of HT by many with prescriptive authority, and also the women in our care.