Estrogen-induced Apoptosis Research Articles

Estrogen for the Treatment and Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Tale of 2 Karnofsky Lectures.

In 1971, Sir Alexander Haddow et al. delivered the inaugural David A. Karnofsky lecture at the American Society for Clinical Oncology. This award was designated American Society for Clinical Oncology's highest, as he had used translational research to identify the first clinical therapy, that is, synthetic estrogens to treat breast cancer. His lecture was entitled "Thoughts on Chemical Therapy." For 40 years, high-dose synthetic estrogens were used as palliative therapy, for some advanced breast cancer patients 5 years following menopause. Mechanisms were unknown. Tamoxifen, a failed "morning-after pill," is an antiestrogen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, which was subsequently used to treat all stages of breast cancer and to prevent breast cancer. In 2008, Jordan was selected to present the 38th Karnofsky lecture entitled: "The Paradoxical Action of Estrogen in Breast Cancer-Survival or Death?" Unexpectedly, through a study of acquired resistance to long-term tamoxifen therapy, estrogen-induced apoptosis in long-term estrogen-deprived breast cancer was deciphered in Jordan's laboratory. These data and the biological rules established under laboratory conditions provided molecular mechanisms to aid in the interpretation of the Women's Health initiative in the United States and the Million Women Study in the United Kingdom. In addition, by establishing laboratory models to understand mechanisms of estrogen-induced apoptosis, new estrogen derivatives were successfully evaluated in the laboratory and tested as candidates for women after the therapeutic failure of antiestrogenic strategies to treat breast cancer. For the future, the knowledge obtained about estrogen-induced apoptosis in cancer holds the promise of discovering new therapies to control or cure cancer in general.

XAF1 destabilizes estrogen receptor α through the assembly of a BRCA1-mediated destruction complex and promotes estrogen-induced apoptosis.

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis-associated factor 1 (XAF1) is a pro-apoptotic tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in multiple human cancers. However, its candidacy as a suppressor in the pathogenesis of breast cancer remains undefined. Here, we report that XAF1 acts as a molecular switch in estrogen (E2)-mediated cell-fate decisions favoring apoptosis over cell proliferation. XAF1 promoter hypermethylation is observed predominantly in estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive versus ERα-negative tumor cells and associated with attenuated apoptotic response to E2. XAF1 is activated by E2 through a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-mediated non-genomic pathway and induces ERα degradation and apoptosis while it is repressed by ERα for E2 stimulation of cell proliferation. The XAF1-ERα mutual antagonism dictates the outcomes of E2 signaling and its alteration is linked to the development of E2-resistant tumors. Mechanistically, XAF1 destabilizes ERα through the assembly of breast cancer-associated gene 1 (BRCA1)-mediated destruction complex. XAF1 interacts with ERα and BRCA1 via the zinc finger (ZF) domains 5/6 and 4, respectively, and the mutants lacking either of these domains fail to drive ERα ubiquitination and apoptosis. E2-induced regression of XAF1+/+ tumors is abolished by XAF1 depletion while XAF1-/- tumors recover E2 response by XAF1 restoration. XAF1 and ERα expression show an inverse correlation in primary breast tumors, and XAF1 expression is associated with the overall survival of patients with ERα-positive but not ERα-negative cancer. Together, this study uncovers an important role for the XAF1-ERα antagonism as a linchpin to govern E2-mediated cell-fate decisions, illuminating the mechanistic consequence of XAF1 alteration in breast tumorigenesis.

Estrogen Receptor Complex to Trigger or Delay Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Long-Term Estrogen Deprived Breast Cancer.

Antiestrogen therapy of breast cancer has been a “gold standard” of treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer for decades. Resistance to antiestrogen therapy may develop, however, a vulnerability in long-term estrogen deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells was discovered. LTED breast cancer cells may undergo estrogen-induced apoptosis within a week of treatment with estrogen in vitro. This phenomenon has been also validated in vivo and in the clinic. The molecular ER-mediated mechanism of action of estrogen-induced apoptosis was deciphered, however, the relationship between the structure of estrogenic ligands and the activity of the ER in LTED breast cancer cells remained a mystery until recently. In this review we provide an overview of the structure-activity relationship of various estrogens with different chemical structures and the modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells resistant to antihormone therapy. We provide analysis of evidence gathered over more than a decade of structure-activity relationship studies by our group on the role of the change in the conformation of the estrogen receptor and the biological activities of different classes of estrogens and the receptor as well in LTED breast cancer.

PERK, Beyond an Unfolded Protein Response Sensor in Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer.

The discovery of 17β-estradiol (E2)-induced apoptosis has clinical relevance. Mechanistically, E2 over activates nuclear estrogen receptor α that results in stress responses. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is initiated by E2 in the endoplasmic reticulum after hours of treatment in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells, thereby activating three UPR sensors-PRK-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) with different functions. Specifically, PERK plays a critical role in induction of apoptosis whereas IRE1α and ATF6 are involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated degradation (ERAD) of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways. In addition to attenuating protein translation, PERK increases the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB and subsequent TNFα expression. In addition, PERK communicates with the mitochondria to regulate oxidative stress at mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM). Furthermore, PERK is a component enriched in MAMs that interacts with multifunctional MAM-tethering proteins and integrally modulates the exchange of metabolites such as lipids, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and Ca2+ at contact sites. MAMs are also critical sites for the initiation of autophagy to remove defective organelles and misfolded proteins through specific regulatory proteins. Thus, PERK conveys signals from nucleus to these membrane-structured organelles that form an interconnected network to regulate E2-induced apoptosis. Herein, we address the mechanistic progress on how PERK acts as a multifunctional molecule to commit E2 to inducing apoptosis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Estrogen Estetrol and Estrogen Mimic BMI-135 for the Treatment of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer.

Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors leads to endocrine-resistance, whereby physiologic levels of estrogen kill breast cancer (BC). Estrogen therapy is effective in treating patients with advanced BC after resistance to TAM and aromatase inhibitors develops. This therapeutic effect is attributed to estrogen-induced apoptosis via the estrogen receptor (ER). Estrogen therapy can have unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse events. Here, we study estetrol (E4) and a model Selective Human ER Partial Agonist (ShERPA) BMI-135. Estetrol and ShERPA TTC-352 are being evaluated in clinical trials. These agents are proposed as safer estrogenic candidates compared with 17β-estradiol (E2) for the treatment of endocrine-resistant BC. Cell viability assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction, luciferase reporter assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation, docking and molecular dynamics simulations, human unfolded protein response (UPR) RT2 PCR profiler arrays, live cell microscopic imaging and analysis, and annexin V staining assays were conducted. Our work was done in eight biologically different human BC cell lines and one human endometrial cancer cell line, and results were compared with full agonists estrone, E2, and estriol, a benchmark partial agonist triphenylethylene bisphenol (BPTPE), and antagonists 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. Our study shows the pharmacology of E4 and BMI-135 as less-potent full-estrogen agonists as well as their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression in LTED BC through triggering a rapid UPR and apoptosis. Our work concludes that the use of a full agonist to treat BC is potentially superior to a partial agonist given BPTPE’s delayed induction of UPR and apoptosis, with a higher probability of tumor clonal evolution and resistance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTGiven the unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse effects of estrogen treatment, the development of safer estrogens for endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC) treatment and hormone replacement therapy remains a priority. The naturally occurring estrogen estetrol and Selective Human Estrogen-Receptor Partial Agonists are being evaluated in endocrine-resistant BC clinical trials. This work provides a comprehensive evaluation of their pharmacology in numerous endocrine-resistant BC models and an endometrial cancer model and their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression through the unfolded protein response and apoptosis.

The Structure-Function Relationship of Angular Estrogens and Estrogen Receptor Alpha to Initiate Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells.

High-dose synthetic estrogen therapy was the standard treatment of advanced breast cancer for three decades until the discovery of tamoxifen. A range of substituted triphenylethylene synthetic estrogens and diethylstilbestrol were used. It is now known that low doses of estrogens can cause apoptosis in long-term estrogen deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells resistant to antiestrogens. This action of estrogen can explain the reduced breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women over 60 who are taking conjugated equine estrogens and the beneficial effect of low-dose estrogen treatment of patients with acquired aromatase inhibitor resistance in clinical trials. To decipher the molecular mechanism of estrogens at the estrogen receptor (ER) complex by different types of estrogens—planar [17β-estradiol (E2)] and angular triphenylethylene (TPE) derivatives—we have synthesized a small series of compounds with either no substitutions on the TPE phenyl ring containing the antiestrogenic side chain of endoxifen or a free hydroxyl. In the first week of treatment with E2 the LTED cells undergo apoptosis completely. By contrast, the test TPE derivatives act as antiestrogens with a free para-hydroxyl on the phenyl ring that contains an antiestrogenic side chain in endoxifen. This inhibits early E2-induced apoptosis if a free hydroxyl is present. No substitution at the site occupied by the antiestrogenic side chain of endoxifen results in early apoptosis similar to planar E2. The TPE compounds recruit coregulators to the ER differentially and predictably, leading to delayed apoptosis in these cells.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIn this paper we investigate the role of the structure-function relationship of a panel of synthetic triphenylethylene (TPE) derivatives and a novel mechanism of estrogen-induced cell death in breast cancer, which is now clinically relevant. Our study indicates that these TPE derivatives, depending on the positioning of the hydroxyl groups, induce various conformations of the estrogen receptor’s ligand-binding domain, which in turn produces differential recruitment of coregulators and subsequently different apoptotic effects on the antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells.

Abstract P1-08-01: Estrogen-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer: Insights from single cells analysis of a patient-derived xenograft model

Abstract Background: Estradiol (E2) is known to promote breast cancer. However, several small-scale prospective clinical trials reported the unexpected therapeutic benefit of E2 for aromatase inhibitor (AI)- resistant cases of hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. Considering that the practicality and safety of E2 treatments are still undefined, the objective of this study is to uncover the mechanisms of E2-induced tumor regression, which will lead to a better design of E2 therapies. Methods: While most of our ER+ breast cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are positively regulated by E2, an estrogen-suppressive model (named GS3) was established from an AI resistant ER+/PR−/HER2− brain metastatic breast cancer. E2 pellets (1mg each) or placebo pellets were implanted in mice carrying GS3 for in vivo drug efficacy examination. Beside tumor growth response, immunohistochemistry (IHC), RNA sequencing, and reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analyses of PDX specimens were conducted to decipher molecular changes after E2 treatments. Importantly, since the cancer tissue has a very heterogeneous structure, the single-cell analysis was further performed to examine gene expression profiles in individual cells. In addition, in vitro cell proliferation analysis was carried out using organoids from GS3. Results: E2 inhibited the growth of GS3 both in vivo and in vitro. ERα and ERβ genes in GS3 are wild-type and not amplified. ERα is involved because E2-mediated inhibition of GS3-organoids can be reversed by the co-treatment of ERα antagonist (MPP), not by ERβ antagonist (PHTPP). IHC showed that PR expression appeared, Ki-67 and CEACAM5 (CEA) expressions decreased, and the number of apoptotic cells significantly increased after E2 treatment. RNA sequencing indicated that estrogen-regulated genes, e.g., PGR, EGR3, PDZK1, and GREB1, were up-regulated, while tumor growth was repressed by E2. Single cell RNAseq analysis demonstrated that cells from E2-treated and Placebo-treated tumors were placed in different clusters based on principle component analysis of Highly Variable Genes (HVGs). Importantly, after one-week, many cells of E2-treated PDXs were arrested within the G1 phase of the cell cycle (G1, 60%; S, 19%; G2M, 21%), whereas, cells of placebo-treated samples advanced to the S and G2M phases (G1, 47%; S, 27%; G2M, 26%). Gene Set Variation Analysis of cells from E2-treated PDXs revealed enrichment of genes associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) mechanism. E2 increased cells expressing pro-apoptotic genes, such as TP53, BOK,IL24, and PGLYRP2. Gene expressions including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, such as GADD45A, MAP3K5 (ASK1), MAPK9 (JNK2), and especially MAPKAPK2 were also increased in E2 treated PDXs. Conclusions: E2/ERα-mediated suppression of GS3 tumor growth was accompanying the inhibition of the cell cycle progression and increased expression of pro-apoptotic genes. It is known that classical MAPK pathway induces cell proliferation, meanwhile, JNK MAPK pathway induces p53 signaling pathway and apoptosis. We hypothesize that E2 induces ROS and promotes apoptosis of GS3 due to JNK MAPK pathway activation. This could be an unexpected outcome of AI resistance. Using this valuable estrogen-down-regulated ER+ breast cancer PDX and informative integrative omics analyses, critical molecular mechanisms on E2-mediated apoptosis are being revealed in our laboratory. The ongoing research using E2-sensitive PDXs will identify key markers to select AI resistant patients who are expected to respond effectively to estrogen-induced apoptosis treatments as well as to evaluate the efficacy of drug combination with estrogen, including CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: Hitomi Mori, Kohei Saeki, Gregory Chang, Xiwei Wu, Pei-Yin Hsu, Noriko Kanaya, George Somlo, Shiuan Chen. Estrogen-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer: Insights from single cells analysis of a patient-derived xenograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-01.

Abstract P5-12-01: SOLE (study of letrozole extension), a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of continuous vs intermittent letrozole in postmenopausal women who have received 4-6 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for lymph node-positive, early breast cancer (BC): Final analysis and sole estrogen substudy (SOLE-EST)

Abstract Background: In animal models of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, acquired resistance to continued letrozole was shown to be reversed by estrogen-induced apoptosis. We hypothesized that the rise in estrogen levels during short treatment interruptions would resensitize breast cancer cells to letrozole and improve treatment outcome. SOLE tested the hypothesis that 3 mos treatment-free intervals during extended adjuvant therapy will improve disease-free survival (DFS). We previously reported the primary endpoint after 60 mos median follow-up: extended intermittent letrozole did not improve DFS vs extended continuous letrozole. However, only 9% of pts had breast cancer events, justifying updating the analysis with longer follow-up. The dynamic of recovery of estrogen levels after stopping letrozole therapy has not been previously reported. Methods: SOLE enrolled 4884 postmenopausal women with HR+ lymph node-positive BC who had completed 4-6 yrs of adjuvant endocrine therapy (19% SERM, 43% AI, 38% both; stratification factor). Pts were randomized to an additional 5 yrs continuous letrozole (2.5 mg daily; n=2441) vs 5 yrs intermittent letrozole (taken for the first 9 mos of yrs 1-4, and 12 mos in yr 5; n=2443). We report the final analysis of the SOLE trial after 84 mos median follow-up. In SOLE-EST, levels of estradiol (E2), estrone (E1) and estrone sulphate (E1S) at 0, 9, 10.5 and 12 mos after randomization were determined using a highly sensitive assay in a subgroup of 90 evaluable patients (21 in the continuous and 69 in the intermittent group). Results: There were 923 DFS events. 7 yr DFS was 81.5% in both groups. More pts had distant metastases in the continuous group (8.7% vs 7.5%) while second (non-breast) malignancies were more frequent in the intermittent group (5.5% vs 4.7%). Similar outcomes were observed for breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) (88.6% vs 88.0%), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) (91.6% vs 90.4%), and overall survival (OS) (90.6% vs 89.6%) for pts assigned intermittent vs continuous letrozole. In the intermittent group, median E2, E1 and E1S levels more than doubled compared with levels at 9 mos after randomization in the first 6 weeks after stopping letrozole during the treatment free interval while levels were stable for the 21 pts tested in the continuous group. Conclusions: Among postmenopausal women with HR+ BC, extended intermittent letrozole did not improve DFS vs continuous letrozole. Similar outcome was consistently observed for BCFI, DRFI and OS. The SOLE-EST substudy indicates an important increase in estrogen levels as soon as 6 weeks after stopping letrozole therapy in the intermittent group. Further investigation of prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors in relation with outcome and with E2, E1 and E1S levels in SOLE-EST are underway. Citation Format: Guy Jerusalem, Subrina Farah, Jacquie Chirgwin, Stefan Aebi, Per Karlsson, Patrick Neven, Erika Hitre, Marie-Pascale Graas, Edda Simoncini, Claus Kamby, Alastair Thompson, Sibylle Loibl, Joaquín Gavilá, Katsumasa Kuroi, Christian Marth, Bettina Müller, Seamus O'Reilly, Andrea Gombos, Thomas Ruhstaller, Harold Burstein, Manuela Rabaglio, Barbara Ruepp, Giuseppe Viale, Richard D Gelber, Alan S Coates, Angelo Di Leo, Aron Goldhirsch, Meredith Regan, Marco Colleoni. SOLE (study of letrozole extension), a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of continuous vs intermittent letrozole in postmenopausal women who have received 4-6 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for lymph node-positive, early breast cancer (BC): Final analysis and sole estrogen substudy (SOLE-EST) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-01.

Abstract P5-11-12: Clinical value of ESR1 mutations from cell free DNA in ethynil estradiol treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: There are some cases in which estrogen addition therapy with ethinyl estradiol (EE2) is effective in cases in which aromatase inhibotor (AI) acquired resistance has been achieved after prolonged administration. In such case, ESR1 mutation was reported to be frequently seen. In this study, we examined the relation between histopathological factors, or ESR1 mutations detected by multiplex droplet digital PCR from cell free DNA (cfDNA) in patients’ and the effect of EE2 treatment. Patients and methods: From 2011 to 2016, we conducted a prospective observational study of EE2 therapy (0.5 to 3 mg / day PO) in our department (registration No. UMIN000002831). ER/PgR expression by IHC in a part cases, and serum E2 and FSH levels and blood cell counts in all cases were evaluated before/after treatment. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system by the QX200™ Droplet Digital™ PCR System (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) which makes thousands of droplets and each of them contained one or no copy of the sequence of ESR1 gene reacted with a pair of primers and two TaqMan probes. The PCR data were quantified using QuantaSoft™ software (Bio-Rad laboratories) and data are expressed as a percentage of mutant to total (mutant plus wild type) for each sample. Results: In this series, partial response (PR) was seen in 30% (12/40), long stable disease 12.5% (5/40), clinical benefit rate (CBR) 42.5% (17/40). The median EE2 dosing period in cases with CB was 8.4 months. AI was re-administered to 17 cases for which efficacy was obtained by EE2, and 8 cases had CB. After that, EE2 was re-challenge to 4 cases obtained effective cases. After EE2 treatment, serum E2 level increased and FSH decreased. In addition, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio increased, but its biological significance was unknown. Point mutations (Y537S, Y537N, D538G) of the ESR1 gene in cell free DNA in plasma were searched in 21 cases before EE2 administration, and High frequent ESR1 mutations were seen in 10 cases (47%) in any mutative site. In the patients with wild type of ESR1 before treatment, there were tended to be more effective for EE2 treatment, but they were not statistically significant. Additionally, no relationship between PIK3CA mutations (E542x, E545x, H1047x, G1049x) and EE2 effect was seen. Conclusion: The action mechanisms of EE2 treatment were reported as estrogen-induced apoptosis, which may not be related to ESR1 nor PIK3CA mutations. Further research related to EE2 treatment with biologic factors, such as gene alterations of the related factors, must be required. Citation Format: Hirotaka Iwase, Takashi Takeshita, Mutsuko Ibusuki, Aiko Sueta, Mai Tomiguchi, Yoshitaka Fujiki, Yutaka Yamamoto. Clinical value of ESR1 mutations from cell free DNA in ethynil estradiol treatment for metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-12.

Suppression of Nuclear Factor-κB by Glucocorticoid Receptor Blocks Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Estrogen-Deprived Breast Cancer Cells.

Our clinically relevant finding is that glucocorticoids block estrogen (E2)-induced apoptosis in long-term E2-deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells. However, the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that E2 widely activated adipose inflammatory factors such as fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1), IL6, and TNFα in LTED breast cancer cells. Activation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) by the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone upregulated FADS1 and IL6, but downregulated TNFα expression. Furthermore, dexamethasone was synergistic or additive with E2 in upregulating FADS1 and IL6 expression, whereas it selectively and constantly suppressed TNFα expression induced by E2 in LTED breast cancer cells. Regarding regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress, dexamethasone effectively blocked activation of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) by E2, but it had no inhibitory effects on inositol-requiring protein 1 alpha (IRE1α) expression increased by E2 Consistently, results from reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) analysis demonstrated that dexamethasone could not reverse IRE1α-mediated degradation of PI3K/Akt-associated signal pathways activated by E2 Unexpectedly, activated GR preferentially repressed nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) DNA-binding activity and expression of NF-κB-dependent gene TNFα induced by E2, leading to the blockade of E2-induced apoptosis. Together, these data suggest that trans-suppression of NF-κB by GR in the nucleus is a fundamental mechanism thereby blocking E2-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. This study provided an important rationale for restricting the clinical use of glucocorticoids, which will undermine the beneficial effects of E2-induced apoptosis in patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer.

Interaction Between MUC1 and STAT1 Drives IFITM1 Overexpression in Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells and Mediates Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis.

The human oncoprotein, mucin 1 (MUC1), drives tumorigenesis in breast carcinomas by promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), epigenetic reprogramming, and evasion of immune response. MUC1 interacts with STAT1, through JAK/STAT signaling, and stimulates transcription of IFN-stimulated genes, specifically IFN-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1). Our laboratory has previously shown that IFITM1 overexpression in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant breast cancer cells promotes aggressiveness. Here, we demonstrate that differential regulation of MUC1 in AI-sensitive (MCF-7 and T-47D) compared with AI-resistant (MCF-7:5C) cells is critical in mediating IFITM1 expression. A tumor microarray of 94 estrogen receptor-positive human breast tumors correlated coexpression of MUC1 and IFITM1 with poor recurrence-free survival, poor overall survival, and AI-resistance. In this study, we investigated the effects of MUC1/IFITM1 on cell survival and proliferation. We knocked down MUC1 levels with siRNA and pharmacologic inhibitors, which abrogated IFITM1 mRNA and protein expression and induced cell death in AI-resistant cells. In vivo, estrogen and ruxolitinib significantly reduced tumor size and decreased expression of MUC1, P-STAT1, and IFITM1. IMPLICATIONS: MUC1 and IFITM1 overexpression drives AI resistance and can be targeted with currently available therapies.Visual Overview: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/17/5/1180/F1.large.jpg.

Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancers Is Phenocopied by Blocking Dephosphorylation of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 Alpha (eIF2α) Protein.

Approximately 30% of aromatase-inhibitor-resistant, estrogen receptor-positive patients with breast cancer benefit from treatment with estrogen. This enigmatic estrogen action is not well understood and how it occurs remains elusive. Studies indicate that the unfolded protein response and apoptosis pathways play important roles in mediating estrogen-triggered apoptosis. Using MCF7:5C cells, which mimic aromatase inhibitor resistance, and are hypersensitive to estrogen as evident by induction of apoptosis, we define increased global protein translational load as the trigger for estrogen-induced apoptosis. The protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase pathway was activated followed by increased phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2 alpha (eIF2α). These actions block global protein translation but preferentially allow high expression of specific transcription factors, such as activating transcription factor 4 and C/EBP homologous protein that facilitate apoptosis. Notably, we recapitulated this phenotype of MCF7:5C in two other endocrine therapy-resistant cell lines (MCF7/LCC9 and T47D:A18/4-OHT) by increasing the levels of phospho-eIF2α using salubrinal to pharmacologically inhibit the enzymes responsible for dephosphorylation of eIF2α, GADD34, and CReP. RNAi-mediated ablation of these genes induced apoptosis that used the same signaling as salubrinal treatment. Moreover, combining 4-hydroxy tamoxifen with salubrinal enhanced apoptotic potency. IMPLICATIONS: These results not only elucidate the mechanism of estrogen-induced apoptosis but also identify a drugable target for potential therapeutic intervention that can mimic the beneficial effect of estrogen in some breast cancers.

New insights into acquired endocrine resistance of breast cancer.

The translational research strategy of targeting estrogen receptor α (ERα) positive breast cancer and then using long term anti-hormone adjuvant therapy (5-10 years) has reduced recurrences and mortality. However, resistance continues to occur and improvements are required to build on the success of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) established over the past 40 years. Further translational research has described the evolution of acquired resistance of breast cancer cell lines to long term estrogen deprivation that parallels clinical experience over years. Additionally, recent reports have identified mutations in the ERα obtained from the recurrences of AI treated patients. These mutations allow the ERα to activate without ligands and auto stimulate metastatic tumor growth. Furthermore, the new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis in acquired resistant models in vitro and in vivo has been interrogated and applied to clinical trials. Inflammation and stress are emerging concepts occurring in the process of acquired resistance and estrogen-induced apoptosis with different mechanisms. In this review, we will present progress in the understanding of acquired resistance, focus on stress and inflammatory responses in the development of acquired resistance, and consider approaches to create new treatments to improve the treatment of breast cancer with endocrine resistance.

Targeting Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ to Increase Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Estrogen-Deprived Breast Cancer Cells.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is an important transcription factor that modulates lipid metabolism and inflammation. However, it remains unclear whether PPARγ is involved in modulation of estrogen (E2)-induced inflammation, thus affecting apoptosis of E2-deprived breast cancer cells, MCF-7:5C and MCF-7:2A. Here, we demonstrated that E2 treatment suppressed the function of PPARγ in both cell lines, although the suppressive effect in MCF-7:2A cells was delayed owing to high PPARγ expression. Activation of PPARγ by a specific agonist, pioglitazone, selectively blocked the induction of TNFα expression by E2, but did not affect other adipose inflammatory genes, such as fatty acid desaturase 1 and IL6. This suppression of TNFα expression by pioglitazone was mainly mediated by transrepression of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) DNA-binding activity. A novel finding was that NF-κB functions as an oxidative stress inducer in MCF-7:5C cells but an antioxidant in MCF-7:2A cells. Therefore, the NF-κB inhibitor JSH-23 displayed effects equivalent to those of pioglitazone, with complete inhibition of apoptosis in MCF-7:5C cells, but it increased E2-induced apoptosis in MCF-7:2A cells. Depletion of PPARγ by siRNA or the PPARγ antagonist T0070907 accelerated E2-induced apoptosis, with activation of NF-κB-dependent TNFα and oxidative stress. For the first time, we demonstrated that PPARγ is a growth signal and has potential to modulate NF-κB activity and oxidative stress in E2-deprived breast cancer cell lines. All of these findings suggest that anti-PPARγ therapy is a novel strategy to improve the therapeutic effects of E2-induced apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer.

Endoxifen, 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and an Estrogenic Derivative Modulate Estrogen Receptor Complex Mediated Apoptosis in Breast Cancer.

Estrogen therapy was used to treat advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women for decades until the introduction of tamoxifen. Resistance to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors used as a treatment of breast cancer inevitably occurs, but unexpectedly low-dose estrogen can cause regression of breast cancer and increase disease-free survival in some patients. This therapeutic effect is attributed to estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer. Here, we describe modulation of the estrogen receptor (ER) liganded with antiestrogens (endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen) and an estrogenic triphenylethylene (TPE), ethoxytriphenylethylene (EtOXTPE), on estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells. Our results show that the angular TPE estrogen (EtOXTPE) is able to induce the ER-mediated apoptosis only at a later time compared with planar estradiol in these cells. Using real-time polymerase chain reaction, chromatin immunoprecipitation, western blotting, molecular modeling, and X-ray crystallography techniques, we report novel conformations of the ER complex with an angular estrogen EtOXTPE and endoxifen. We propose that alteration of the conformation of the ER complexes, with changes in coactivator binding, governs estrogen-induced apoptosis through the protein kinase regulated by RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase sensor system to trigger an unfolded protein response.

Modulation of nuclear factor-kappa B activation by the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor PERK to mediate estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells

Stress responses are critical for estrogen (E2)-induced apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer cells. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) is an important therapeutic target to prevent stress responses in chronic inflammatory diseases including cancer. However, whether E2 activates NF-κB to participate in stress-associated apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer cells is unknown. Here, we demonstrated that E2 differentially modulates NF-κB activity according to treatment time. E2 initially has significant potential to suppress NF-κB activation; it completely blocks tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-induced activation of NF-κB. We found that E2 preferentially and constantly enhances the expression of the adipogenic transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ), which is responsible for the suppression of NF-κB activation by E2 in MCF-7:5C cells. Interestingly, NF-κB p65 DNA-binding activity is increased when E2 is administered for 48 h, leading to the induction of TNFα and associated apoptosis. Blocking the nuclear translocation of NF-κB can completely prevent the induction of TNFα and apoptosis induced by E2. Further examination revealed that protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), a stress sensor of unfolded protein response (UPR), plays an essential role in the late activation of NF-κB by E2. This modulation between PERK and NF-κB is mainly mediated by a stress responsive transcription factor, transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), independently of the classic canonical IκBα signaling pathway. Thus, inhibition of PERK kinase activity completely blocks the DNA binding of both STAT3 and NF-κB, thereby preventing induction of NF-κB-dependent genes and E2-induced apoptosis. All of these findings suggest that PERK is a key regulator to convey stress signals from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus and illustrate a crucial role for the novel PERK/STAT3/NF-κB/TNFα axis in E2-induced apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer cells.

Nitric oxide is cytoprotective to breast cancer spheroids vulnerable to estrogen-induced apoptosis.

Estrogen-induced apoptosis has become a successful treatment for postmenopausal metastatic, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nitric oxide involvement in the response to this endocrine treatment and its influence upon estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer progression is still unclear.Nitric oxide impact on the MCF7 breast cancer line, before and after estrogen-induced apoptosis, was investigated in 3D culture systems using unique live-cell imaging methodologies.Spheroids were established from MCF7 cells vulnerable to estrogen-induced apoptosis, before and after exposure to estrogen.Spheroids derived from estrogen-treated cells exhibited extensive apoptosis levels with downregulation of estrogen receptor expression, low proliferation rate and reduced metabolic activity, unlike spheroids derived from non-treated cells. In addition to basic phenotypic differences, these two cell cluster types are diverse in their reactions to exogenous nitric oxide.A dual effect of nitric oxide was observed in the breast cancer phenotype sensitive to estrogen-induced apoptosis. Nitric oxide, at the nanomolar level, induced cell proliferation, high metabolic activity, downregulation of estrogen receptor and enhanced collective invasion, contributing to a more aggressive phenotype. Following hormone supplementation, breast cancer 3D clusters were rescued from estrogen-induced apoptosis by these low nitric oxide-donor concentrations, since nitric oxide attenuates cell death levels, upregulates survivin expression and increases metabolic activity.Higher nitric oxide concentrations (100nM) inhibited cell growth, metabolism and promoted apoptosis. These results suggest that nitric oxide, in nanomolar concentrations, may inhibit estrogen-induced apoptosis, playing a major role in hormonal therapy. Inhibiting nitric oxide activity may benefit breast cancer patients and ultimately reduce tumor recurrence.

Abstract 5633: Unique modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis with structural analogues of endoxifen in long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells

Abstract Endoxifen, a non-steroidal anti-estrogen is the active hydroxylated metabolite of N-desmethyltamoxifen. The structure is based on a synthetic triphenylethylene-type angular estrogen. Endoxifen is in clinical trials as a therapeutic agent to treat aromatase resistant breast cancer. Paradoxically, LTED breast cancer is known to respond to synthetic and natural estrogens through estrogen-induced apoptosis. A series of synthetic endoxifen analogs, were used to modulate estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells (MCF7:5C). X-ray crystallography was performed on endoxifen, bisphenol, and diethylstillbestrol (DES), bound to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human estrogen receptor (ER). Cellular studies established that (MCF-7:5C) of estrogen-induced apoptosis was dependent on the LBD of the ER. Similarly, endoxifen blocked estrogen-induced apoptosis in a concentration and time-dependent manner. Apoptosis triggered by DES was blocked by endoxifen and was ER-dependent. X-ray crystallography of both endoxifen and DES illustrate the two extremes of estrogen-induced apoptosis, which is dependent upon the closure of helix 12 over the LBD to generate estrogenic activity. Despite the fact that bisphenol, an analog of endoxifen without the anti-estrogenic monomethylamino ethyl side chain, is an estrogen that causes breast cancer cell replication; bisphenol initially inhibits estrogen-induced apoptosis, but triggers estrogen-induced apoptosis itself after 7 days of treatment of LTED breast cancer cells. X-ray crystallography demonstrates that bisphenol can produce a unique complex with the ER:LBD, which is similar to the DES:LBD estrogenic complex. In both cases, the ligands are sealed into the LBD by helix 12. This delay in apoptosis caused by an analog of endoxifen, that is an angular estrogen, possess unique biological features. We hypothesize that in LTED cells the complex passes through an anti-estrogenic conformation to evolve into an estrogenic complex with helix 12 sealing the LBD. We describe a unique property of a ligand:receptor complex. For the first time we demonstrate that a ligand:receptor complex is slowly activated from an antagonist to an agonist complex over a period of days. Citation Format: Balkees Abderrahman, Sean W. Fanning, Daniela Quintana Rincon, Geoffrey Greene, Philipp Y. Maximov, V. Craig Jordan. Unique modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis with structural analogues of endoxifen in long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5633. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5633

Abstract 4311: Targeting specific regulatory subunits of protein phosphatase 1 phenocopies estrogen-induced apoptosis

Abstract The growth of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers is considered to be dependent on estrogen and its actions can be blocked by selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS), like tamoxifen, or by inhibiting the synthesis of estrogen, by aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Both of these classes of drug are used to treat ER+ breast cancers in the clinic. Paradoxically, before the discovery of SERMs and AIs, high dose estrogen was the choice of endocrine therapy to treat post-menopausal breast cancers. Recent clinical trials have confirmed a 30% clinical benefit rate with high, as well as low, doses of estrogen therapy in AI- resistant breast cancers. However, the underlying mechanism by which estrogen triggers the tumor regression remains unknown. Using an in vitro cell model MCF7:5C cells, that undergo estrogen-induced apoptosis, we demonstrate that sustained phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2-alpha (eIF2-α), a downstream target of PERK activation, is crucial in estrogen-induced apoptosis. Growth arrest and DNA damage inducible-34 (GADD34) and constitutive repressor of eIF2α phosphorylation (CReP) are two regulatory subunits of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) complex, that provides substrate specificity towards eIF2α, and are responsible for its de-phosphorylation. Our results show that pharmacological inhibition of GADD34 and CReP, or their genetic depletion, can enhance the phospho-eIF2α (p-eIF2α) levels and promote apoptosis. Elevated levels of p-eIF2α attenuated global translation but preferentially allowed high expression of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) that are involved in apoptosis. Both estrogen and inhibition of GADD34 and CReP promote apoptosis by an identical mechanism. Importantly, inhibition of GADD34 and CReP induced apoptosis in another estrogen-independent breast cancer cell line, LCC9, which is resistant to both tamoxifen and fulvestrant but does not undergo estrogen mediated apoptosis. Overall, our study provides crucial evidence that inhibiting specific regulatory subunits (GADD34 and CReP) of PP1 complex, can mimic estrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells that are not susceptible to estrogen mediated apoptosis. Therefore, GADD34 and CReP can be targeted for potential therapeutic intervention in endocrine therapy resistant breast cancers. Citation Format: Catherine Sevigny, Surojeet Sengupta, Kerrie B. Bouker, Robert Clarke. Targeting specific regulatory subunits of protein phosphatase 1 phenocopies estrogen-induced apoptosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4311. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4311

Abstract 2332: Integral modulation of nuclear factor-kappa B activation by C/EBPβ and the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor PERK to mediate estrogen-induced apoptosis in estrogen-deprived breast cancer cells

Abstract Stress responses are critical for estrogen (E2) to induce apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer cells. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) is well known as a therapeutic target to prevent stress responses in chronic inflammatory diseases including cancer. However, whether E2 activates NF-κB to participate in stress-associated apoptosis in E2-deprived breast cancer cells is unclear. We demonstrated that E2 differentially modulates NF-κB activity in E2-deprived breast cancer cells according to the treatment time. Because E2 initially has significant potential to down modulate the NF-κB activation, it completely suppresses the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-induced NF-κB activation. We found that E2 preferentially and constantly enhances the expression of transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) which is responsible for suppression of NF-κB activation by E2 in MCF-7:5C cells. The mTOR signaling pathway promotes repression of NF-κB by C/EBPβ which is confirmed by the evidence that inhibition of mTOR is synergistic with E2 to upregulate NF-κB-dependent genes, such as TNFα. Interestingly, NF-κB p65 activity is upregulated when E2-treatment is administered for 48 hours, leading to induction of TNFα. Blocking the nuclear translocation of NF-κB completely prevents E2 from induction of TNFα and apoptosis. Importantly, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), a stress sensor of unfolded protein response, is activated by E2 and plays an essential role in increasing NF-κB p65 DNA binding through the activation of STAT3, independently of canonical IκBα signal pathway. Thus, inhibition of PERK kinase activity completely blocks nuclear activation of NF-κB and NF-κB-dependent induction of TNFα, thereby preventing E2-induced apoptosis. All of these findings illustrate a crucial role for the novel PERK/NF-κB/TNFα axis in E2-induced apoptosis which is integrally modulated by the stress responsive transcription factor C/EBPβ and endoplasmic reticulum stress. This study provides an important rationale for exercising caution in clinical trials when considering targeting PERK or NF-κB following the development of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors whereas mTOR may be a target to enhance the therapeutic effects of E2 in antihormone resistant breast cancer. Citation Format: Ping Fan, Amit K. Tyagi, Fadeke A. Agboke, Niranjana Pokharel, V. Craig Jordan. Integral modulation of nuclear factor-kappa B activation by C/EBPβ and the endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor PERK to mediate estrogen-induced apoptosis in estrogen-deprived breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2332. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2332