Essential Public Health Services Research Articles

Ways to Think About Money

Healthy People 2010, the nation's objectives for achieving a higher level of health, includes Goal 23-16: Increase the proportion of federal, tribal, state, and local public health agencies that gather accurate data on public health expenditures, categorized by essential public health service. Taking time to understand the complexities of accounting for public health expenditures, as well as the reasons for doing so, is an essential precursor to taking the needed steps to include economic information in public health policy making and public health systems research.

Tracking Our Investments in Public Health

A voluntary public health expenditures reporting system existed in the United States for over 25 years, tracking and reporting trends in health department expenditures, revenue streams, functions, and programs. Today, no such system exists and no data are available to help us understand how and where public health dollars are being spent and the trends during good and bad economic times. This article discusses the history of and lessons learned from the former public health expenditures reporting system and more recent demonstration projects that experimented with reporting by essential public health services. The article also explores how what we have learned can be used for developing and implementing a system today to meet public health and public policy needs.

Getting What You Pay For

Governmental spending in public health varies widely across communities, raising questions about how these differences may affect the availability of essential services and infrastructure. This study used data from local public health systems that participated in the National Public Health Performance Standards Program pilot tests between 1999 and 2001 to examine the association between public health spending and the performance of essential public health services. Results indicated that performance varies significantly with both local and federal spending levels, even after controlling for other system and community characteristics. Some public health services appear more sensitive to these expenditures than others, and all services appear more sensitive to local spending than to state or federal spending. These findings can assist public health decision makers in identifying public health financing priorities during periods of change in the resources available to support local public health infrastructure.

Practices in Public Health Finance

A field of study for public health finance has never been adequately developed. Consequently, very little is known about the relationships, types, and amount of finances that fund the public health system in America. This research was undertaken to build on the sparse knowledge of public health finance by examining the value of performance measurement systems to financial analysis. A correlational study was conducted to examine the associations between public health system performance of the 10 essential public health services and funding patterns of 50 local health departments in a large state. The specific objectives were to investigate if different levels and types of revenues, expenditures, and other demographic variables in a jurisdiction are correlated to performance. Pearson correlation analysis did not conclusively show strong associations; however, statistically significant positive associations primarily between higher levels of performance and jurisdiction taxes per capita were found.

Using the Essential Public Health Services as strategic leverage to strengthen the public health response to diabetes.

If current trends continue, health systems will soon be overwhelmed by type 2 diabetes mellitus. Successful population-based diabetes prevention and control efforts require a sound and continually improving infrastructure. In states and U.S. territories, the Diabetes Prevention and Control Programs supported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Diabetes Translation serve as a fulcrum for building and refining the infrastructure that links diverse and dynamic partners dedicated to increasing the years and quality of life and achieving health equity among people with and at risk for diabetes. The National Public Health Performance Standards offer a conceptual framework that articulates the requisite infrastructure and services provided by an interconnected network of intersectoral partners to strengthen the public health response to diabetes. These standards associated with the Essential Public Health Services are valuable tools to assess the status of the performance of the health system's infrastructure to guide improvement. The process of engaging system partners in a system-wide assessment informs and leverages cross-sectoral assets to improve health outcomes for citizens in communities shouldering the growing burden of diabetes.

Identifying dimensions of performance in local public health systems: results from the National Public Health Performance Standards Program.

This article uses data from the National Public Health Performance Standards Program to explore how the performance of essential public health services varies across communities and to identify underlying domains of activity that appear to drive variation in performance. Cross-sectional data were used from 315 local public health jurisdictions located within seven states that participated in the Performance Standards Program pilot tests between 1999 and 2001. Results demonstrate that local public health systems vary considerably in the extent to which they perform essential services and meet established performance standards. Factor analysis results indicate that four underlying domains of activity explain much of the variation observed in the individual performance measures, and that achieving performance standards for a single essential public health service often involves more than one underlying domain of activity. The findings suggest that composite measures constructed from the Performance Standards Program can assist public health decision makers in monitoring the performance of public health systems and identifying promising pathways for improving performance.

Local public health agency capacity and its relationship to public health system performance.

he study described in this article identifies local public health agency capacity characteristics that are related to their local public health systems' performance scores on the CDC's National Public Health Performance Standards Program assessment instrument. Public health system performance scores from a test version of the National Public Health Performance Standards instrument (5b) from county and city/county jurisdictions in three states were matched to organizational capacity data from the 1997 National Association of County and City Health Officials profile of health departments, resulting in a sample of 152 jurisdictions. Twenty-eight capacity variables from the profile and all 10 scores on the Essential Public Health Services plus the total performance score were analyzed in 11 separate multivariate regression models. Public health agency capacities in the areas of funding, organizational leadership, and certain nonprovider partnerships were found to be significantly related to public health system performance. Further study is needed to determine if these relationships between agency capacities and system performance are found, with data from other states now using the nationally released performance assessment instruments and with capacity measures that are more specific for evaluating public health system performance.

Local variation in public health preparedness: lessons from California.

Since September 2001 Congress has allocated approximately dollars 3 billion to strengthen the public health infrastructure. To achieve this goal, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) allocates funding to states, which distribute funds to local jurisdictions. Evidence-based measures to assess public health preparedness are lacking. We used an expert-panel process to develop performance measures, based on the ten essential public health services. We developed and conducted tabletop exercises in California to evaluate preparedness to detect and respond to a hypothetical smallpox outbreak based on those measures. There was wide variation of readiness in California. While the sources of variation are often different, common infrastructure gaps need to be addressed.

Households: passive users or active managers?: The case of solid waste management in Accra, Ghana

Solid waste management is an essential public health service, but in manydeveloping countries it is not provided to the full satisfaction of residents.Generally, solid waste systems tend to be provided on the basis of technical andfinancial considerations, and little or no consultation is carried out with therecipients of the service. Systems are often designed to satisfy the short-termviews of politicians and professionals, rather than the needs of the users of theservice. This has led to the development of solid waste systems that are inappropriate,and so receive little cooperation from residents. Consultation with theusers at all stages of planning and implementation could improve the quality ofservices and reduce the costs. There is a need to develop new approaches that arebased on integrating the existing practices and perceptions of the users withproposed developments. This paper presents the findings of a study thatexplored households' approaches to solid waste management in three suburbs inAccra, Ghana. The study showed that household activities are greatly influencedby social factors, service type and income levels. The study concludes that boththe cooperation of households and cost recovery would be enhanced if residentswere more involved in the planning of schemes.

Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Public Health Performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) has developed instruments to measure the performance of local and state public health departments on the 10 "Essential Services of Public Health," which have been tested in several states. This article is a report of the evaluation of the content and criterion validity of the local public health performance assessment instrument, and the content validity of the state public health performance assessment instrument. Health department performance is measured using a set of indicators developed for the 10 Essential Services of Public Health and a model standard for each indicator. Content validity of each model standard in the local instrument was addressed by community partners along the following dimensions: the importance of each standard as a measure of the associated Essential Service, its completeness as a measure, and its reasonableness for achievement. All standards for each Essential Service were then judged in terms of their completeness in measuring performance in that service. Content validity of the state instrument was evaluated in a group interview of health department staff members from three states. Criterion validity of the local instrument was assessed for a sample of eight public health departments in Florida and six in New York by examining documentary evidence for selected responses. Criterion validity was also evaluated for a sample of Florida local public health departments and one Hawaii public health department by comparing state health department staffs' judgments of performance against the instrument score. Criterion validity was upheld for a summary performance score on the local instrument, but was not upheld for performance judgments on individual Essential Services. The NPHPSP standards based on the Essential Services have validity for measuring local public health system performance, according to community partners. The model standards are valid measures of state performance, according to state public health departments in three states. Within the scope of the validity evaluations completed, the NPHPSP state and local performance assessment instruments were found to be valid measures of public health performance.

Public health workforce development: progress, challenges, and opportunities.

The public health workforce is key to strengthening public health infrastructure. National partners have articulated a vision of a sustainable and competent workforce prepared to deliver essential public health services. Six strategic elements provide a framework for action: monitoring workforce composition; identifying competencies and developing related curriculum; designing an integrated life-long learning delivery system; providing individual and organizational incentives to ensure competency development; conducting evaluation and research and assuring financial support. Partners convened in January 2003 to review progress and to re-evaluate strategies in light of the recently released Institute of Medicine reports on infrastructure and workforce issues. Although significant challenges remain, there is convergence on priorities for competency development, research questions to be addressed and next steps in the national dialogue on certification and credentialing in public health.

Bioterrorism Preparedness and Essential Public Health Services

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice: September 2003 - Volume 9 - Issue 5 - p 338-339

Lumping and splitting: the health policy agenda in India.

India's health system was designed in a different era, when expectations of the public and private sectors were quite different. India's population is also undergoing transitions in the demographic, epidemiologic and social aspects of health. Disparities in life expectancy, disease, access to health care and protection from financial risks have increased. These factors are challenging the health system to respond in new ways. The old approach to national health policies and programmes is increasingly inappropriate. By analyzing inter- and intra-state differences in contexts and processes, we argue that the content of national health policy needs to be more diverse and accommodating to specific states and districts. More 'splitting' of India's health policy at the state level would better address their health problems, and would open the way to innovation and local accountability. States further along the health transition would be able to develop policies to deal with the emerging epidemic of non-communicable diseases and more appropriate health financing systems. States early in the transition would need to focus on improving the quality and access of essential public health services, and empowering communities to take more ownership. Better 'lumping' of policy issues at the central level is also needed, but not in ways that have been done in the past. The central government needs to focus on overcoming the large inequalities in health outcomes across India, tackle growing challenges to health such as the HIV epidemic, and provide the much needed leadership on systemic issues such as the development of systems for quality assurance and regulation of the private sector. It also needs to support and facilitate states and districts to develop critical capacities rather than directly manage programmes. As India develops a more diverse set of state health policies, there will be more opportunities to learn what works in different policy environments.

Mentorship and competencies for applied chronic disease epidemiology.

To understand the potential and establish a framework for mentoring as a method to develop professional competencies of state-level applied chronic disease epidemiologists, model mentorship programs were reviewed, specific competencies were identified, and competencies were then matched to essential public health services. Although few existing mentorship programs in public health were identified, common themes in other professional mentorship programs support the potential of mentoring as an effective means to develop capacity for applied chronic disease epidemiology. Proposed competencies for chronic disease epidemiologists in a mentorship program include planning, analysis, communication, basic public health, informatics and computer knowledge, and cultural diversity. Mentoring may constitute a viable strategy to build chronic disease epidemiology capacity, especially in public health agencies where resource and personnel system constraints limit opportunities to recruit and hire new staff.

Public health infrastructure system change: outcomes from the turning point initiative.

The Robert Wood Johnson and W.K. Kellogg Foundations created the Turning Point initiative to transform and strengthen the public health infrastructure. This study examined 135 public health system changes for their links to multiple sector collaborative engagement, essential public health services, health outcomes, and infrastructure building strategies. An on-line documentation system developed by the University of Kansas was used to record and analyze these linkages. The results showed that each state accomplished notable system changes; the majority involved more than one sector and primarily related to increasing local public health system capacity and organizational change.

Recommendations from testing of the National Public Health Performance Standards instruments.

The National Public Health performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) has developed assessment instruments based on the ten essential public health services (EPHS) for state and local health departments. The article reviews validity testing of the state and local instruments. The study employed multiple approaches to validity testing with state and local health departments in Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, Mississippi, and New York. The New York State validity checks included the judgments of community partners. The study found that the EPHS have content and face validity as a basis for measuring public health system performance. The article includes recommendations for continued development of the NPHPS.

A public health nursing practice model: melding public health principles with the nursing process.

There has been a shift in emphasis in public health from the provision of personal health services for individuals to efforts targeted at improving the health of the whole community. Many in public health nursing (PHN) have welcomed this shift, recognizing the important role PHN can play in promoting health and preventing disease for all. There continues to be a need to redefine PHN roles and practice so that public health nurses can participate more effectively. Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Public Health Nursing (LAC PHN) has developed a practice model grounded in nationally recognized components: the public health team, PHN standards of practice, the 10 Essential Public Health Services, Healthy People 2010's 10 Leading Health Indicators and additional local indicators, and the Minnesota Public Health Nursing Interventions Model. The LAC PHN Practice Model provides a conceptual framework that assists in clarifying the role of the public health nurse and presents a guide for public health practice applicable to all public health disciplines.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Public Health and Civil Liberties in a Time of Terrorism

The balance between individual interests and common goods needs to be recalibrated in an age of terrorism. Public health agencies should have a robust infrastructure to conduct essential public health services at a level of performance that matches evolving threats to the health. This includes a well-trained workforce, electronic information, surveillance, and laboratory capacity. Public health preparedness also requires a sound legal infrastructure. This article presents and defends the provisions of the Model Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA). The Center for Law and the Public's Health at the request of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and in collaboration with governors, legislators, attorneys general, and public health officials wrote the MSEHPA. First, this article explains the provisions of MSEHPA. The MSEHPA has been adopted in whole or part in 20 states and the District of Columbia. Second, this article shows why extant public health laws provide a weak foundation for public health practice. They are obsolete, inconsistent, and inadequate from a public health and civil liberties perspective. State legislation does not facilitate, and may even impede, all of the critical variables for public health preparedness. Finally, the article offers a systematic defense of MSEHPA. The Model Act has galvanized the public debate around the appropriate balance between public goods and individual rights. This defense shows how the Model Act creates strong public health powers, while safeguarding individual freedoms (adopting clearer standards and more rigorous procedures than existing statutes). In a country too tied to rights rhetoric, any law reform initiative that has the appearance of strengthening governmental authority is bound to travel in tumultuous political waters.

Public health law in an age of terrorism: rethinking individual rights and common goods.

The balance between individual interests and common goods needs to be recalibrated in an age of terrorism. Public health agencies should have a robust infrastructure to conduct essential public health services at a level of performance that matches evolving threats to the health of the public. This includes a well-trained workforce, electronic information, surveillance, and laboratory capacity. This paper explains modern efforts at public health law reform: a Model Public Health Statute and the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA), which has been enacted wholly or in part by nineteen states and the District of Columbia. Next, the paper shows why existing public health laws provide a weak foundation for public health practice. Finally, the paper offers a systematic defense of MSEHPA, which has galvanized the public debate around the appropriate balance between public goods and individual rights.

The process to develop a meaningful community health assessment in New York State.

Conducting and producing a meaningful Community Health Assessment (CHA) is an important and essential public health service and a mandatory biennial activity for New York State's (NYS) Local Health Departments. The Assessment Initiative project has allowed the NYS Department of Health to better understand and identify strategies to strengthen CHAs and to develop training, education, and technical assistance programs. The Assessment Initiative project has benefited from participation, coordination, and sharing of resources and expertise with other community health improvement initiatives in NYS, including those that emphasize collaborative approaches to health improvement, workforce development, and expanding access to data.