Esophageal Function Testing Research Articles

Esophageal Function Testing Patterns in the Evaluation and Management of Lung Transplantation: Results of a National Survey.

We surveyed esophageal motility laboratories affiliated with adult pulmonary transplant centers to determine esophageal function testing (EFT) practices. Gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal dysmotility are associated with worse lung transplant outcomes, yet no consensus guidelines for EFT exist in this population. A deidentified online survey was sent to gastrointestinal motility laboratory directors of 49 academic and community-affiliated medical centers that perform lung transplants. Practice characteristics, including annual lung transplant volume and institutional EFT practices pre-lung transplantation and post-lung transplantation were queried. Respondents were categorized by transplant volume into small and large programs based on median annual volume. Among 35 respondents (71% response rate), the median annual transplant volume was 37, and there were 18 large programs. Institutional EFT protocols were used pretransplant by 24 programs (68.6%) and post-transplant by 12 programs (34.2%). Among small and large programs, 52.9% and 72.2% always obtained high-resolution manometry before transplant, respectively. Endoscopy before transplant was performed more often in small programs (n=17, 100%) compared with large programs (n=15,83.3%). Pretransplant endoscopy ( P =0.04), barium esophagram ( P <0.01), and high-resolution manometry ( P =0.04) were more common than post-transplant. In contrast, post-transplant reflux monitoring off-therapy was more common than pretransplant ( P =0.01). In general, pulmonologists direct referrals for EFT and gastroenterology consultation (n=28, 80.0%), with symptoms primarily prompting testing. In the absence of established guidelines, substantial variability exists in pretransplant and post-transplant EFT, directed by pulmonologists. Standardized EFT protocols and gastroenterologist-directed management of esophageal dysfunction has potential to improve lung transplant outcomes.

546. ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTS BEFORE AND AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY FOR SEVERE OBESITY

Abstract Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in patients with severe obesity. However, changes in esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy have not been well-studied. In this study, we evaluated the effects of sleeve gastrectomy on esophageal function. Methods All patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution are entered into a prospectively maintained database. We queried this database to identify patients who underwent pre- and post-LSG esophageal function tests (ie, high-resolution manometry [HRM] and 24-hour pH monitoring). Post-operative was esophageal function tests done at 12 months after surgery. Results A total of 44 patients underwent LSG between Jul. 2018 and Dec. 2022, of which 11 patients underwent both pre and post-LSG esophageal function tests. The study cohort had a mean age of 65.4 years with 5 males. BMI was significantly decreased after LSG (40.0 vs. 27.4 kg/m2，p=0.004). Manometric hiatal hernia was increased post-LSG (0% vs. 45.5% [n=5/11]), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.063). Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient, and distal contractile integral (DCI) were similar between the two groups (p=0.155, p=0.154, and p=0.131, respectively). Post-LSG 24-hour pH monitoring showed higher acid exposure time (0.4% vs. 11.2%, p=0.005) and DeMeester score (3.5 vs. 33.2, p=0.003). Conclusions Gastroesophageal reflux was significantly exacerbated post-LSG, although esophageal motility and EGJ pressures were preserved after LSG. This may indicate that the change in EGJ morphology and disruption of the angle of His have an important role in mechanism of LSG-related GERD.

Enhancing the diagnostic yield of esophageal manometry using distension-contraction plots of peristalsis and artificial intelligence.

Our prior study reveals that the distension-contraction profiles using high-resolution manometry impedance recordings can distinguish patients with dysphagia symptom but normal esophageal function testing ("functional dysphagia") from control subjects. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the recording protocol used in our prior studies (10-mL swallows with subjects in the Trendelenburg position) against the standard clinical protocol (5-mL swallows with subjects in the supine position). We used advanced machine learning techniques and robust metrics for classification purposes. Studies were performed on 30 healthy subjects and 30 patients with functional dysphagia. A custom-built software was used to extract the relevant distension-contraction features of esophageal peristalsis. Ensemble methods, i.e., gradient boost, support vector machines (SVMs), and logit boost, were used as the primary machine learning algorithms. Although the individual contraction features were marginally different between the two groups, the distension features of peristalsis were significantly different. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values for the standard recording protocol and the distension features ranged from 0.74 to 0.82; they were significantly better for the protocol used in our prior studies, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91. The ROC curve values using three machine learning algorithms were far superior for the distension than the contraction features of esophageal peristalsis, revealing a value of 0.95 for the SVM algorithm. Current patient classification for esophageal motility disorders, based on the contraction phase of peristalsis, ignores a large number of patients who have an abnormality in the distension phase of peristalsis. Distension-contraction plots should be the standard for assessing esophageal peristalsis in clinical practice.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our findings underscore the superiority of distension features over contraction metrics in diagnosing esophageal dysfunctions. By leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning techniques, our study highlights the diagnostic potential of distension-contraction plots of peristalsis. Implementation of these plots could significantly enhance the accuracy of identifying patients with esophageal motor disorders, advocating for their adoption as the standard in clinical practice.

Higher obesity class is associated with more severe esophageal symptoms and reflux burden but not altered motor function or contractile reserve.

Patients with obesity often report esophageal symptoms, with abnormal reflux and esophageal motility suggested as potential mechanisms. However, prior studies showed varying results, often limited by study design/size and esophageal function/symptom measures utilized. We aimed to examine the relationship between obesity and objective esophageal function testing and patient-reported outcomes, utilizing prospective symptom, manometric and reflux monitoring data with impedance. Adults referred for high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRiM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) to evaluate esophageal symptoms were enrolled. Validated symptom and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) instruments were prospectively collected: GERDQ, reflux symptoms index (RSI), dominant symptom intensity (DSI, multiplied 5-point Likert scales for symptom frequency/severity), global symptom severity (GSS, 100-point visual analog scale), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) for HR-QOL. Esophageal function testing measures were compared across body mass index (BMI) categories and correlated with patient-reported outcomes. Seven hundred and fifty four patients were included (Normal:281/Overweight:253/Class I obesity:137/Class II/III obesity:83). Reflux burden measures on MII-pH (acid exposure time, total reflux episodes, bolus exposure time), conclusive pathologic reflux (Lyon), and hiatal hernia were increased in higher obesity classes compared to normal BMI. Class II/III obesity was associated with more normal/hypercontractile swallows, less ineffective swallows, and better bolus transit on HRiM. BMI correlated positively with GERDQ/RSI/DSI/GSS, and negatively with physical component score (SF-12). Esophageal symptom severity and HR-QOL correlated strongly with MII-pH findings, but not HRiM measures. Obesity is associated with increased esophageal symptom burden and worse physical HR-QOL, which correlate with higher acid/bolus reflux burden but not altered esophageal motility/transit/contractile reserve.

Esophageal Function and Reflux Evaluations in Lung Transplantation: A Nationwide Survey of UNOS-Accredited Transplant Centers in the United States.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has been associated with worse lung transplant outcomes. We aimed to assess local practices for esophageal function testing (EFT) across transplant centers. This was a survey study of all United Network for Organ Sharing-accredited adult lung transplant centers regarding local EFT practice. Among 39/63 (60%) responded centers, 38.5% required any EFT (35.9% esophageal manometry, 15.4% pH monitoring, and 28.2% pH impedance), while another 28.2% may consider EFT based on symptoms. Five-year transplant volume was higher among centers requiring EFT (253 vs 159, P = 0.04). Only a minority of lung transplant centers routinely obtained EFT, supporting the need for guidelines for standardized reflux/esophageal assessment.

12. NEUROKININ A AND SUBSTANCE P SERUM CONCENTRATIONS CORRELATE WITH MOTILITY METRICS PREDISPOSING TO REFLUX, BUT NOT WITH ESOPHAGITIS PRESENCE IN GERD

Abstract Background Neurokinin A (NKA) and substance P (SP) may be responsible for airway hyper-reactivity and hypersensitization. Animal studies showed an increase of their blood concentration in response to acid installation into the esophagus, suggesting the presence of neurogenic inflammation in pathogenesis of asthma and chronic cough. Association between serum concentration of these cytokines and esophageal function testing parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is poorly studied. Aim of the study was to assess serum concentration of neurokinin A and substance P in patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive form of GERD and perform correlation analysis between concentrations of these substances and data of multichannel esophageal pH-impedance (MII-pH) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Methods The data of examination of 88 subjects (31 with erosive esophagitis (EE); 57 with non-erosive form of GERD (NERD)) served as a source for the study. Diagnosis of GERD was established per Lyon criteria. Subjects with autoimmune disorders, receiving some medications able to affect esophageal motility were not eligible. Patients underwent HREM with the use of 36-channel solid-state catheters and MII-pH with 2-pH, 6-impedandce sensors. Serum concentrations of NKA and SP were measured with ELISA kits and biochemistry analyzer. Results Acid exposure time (AET), and number of high gastroesophageal refluxes were higher in EE compared to NERD, while number of refluxes and concentrations of NKA and SP were similar. Mean, minimal and residual lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures were lower in EE compared to NERD. There was direct correlation between serum concentration of SP and number of gastroesophageal refluxes (Spearman rank R = 0.26), AET (R = 0.25), and number of refluxes lasting &amp;gt;5 min (R = 0.35). NKA concentration correlated directly with number of refluxes &amp;gt;5 min long (R = 0.28), and inversely with levels of integrated relaxation pressure (R = –0.32), and contractile front velocity (R = –0.38). Conclusions In patients with GERD, serum concentrations of Neurokinin A and Substance P do not depend on the presence of esophagitis and probably are not caused by the influence of reflux content to sensory neurons of esophageal mucosa. Established correlations may support the involvement of Neurokinin A and Substance P in pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Esophageal Inlet Patch: Association with Barrett's Esophagus.

Esophageal inlet patch (IP) with heterotopic gastric mucosa is an incidental finding on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Although IP is thought to be embryologic in nature, IP has been associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to compare prevalence, symptoms, demographic factors, and esophageal testing in patients with IP and BE. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic findings of EGDs, high-resolution esophageal manometry and esophageal pH impedance studies from January 2010 to January 2021 at a single academic medical center. Patients were grouped by presence or absence of IP and BE. Of 27,498 patients evaluated, 1.3% had endoscopic evidence of IP and 4.9% had BE. Of 362 patients with IP, 17.1% had BE; of 1356 patients with BE, 4.6% had IP. Both IP and BE patients presented primarily with heartburn and/or regurgitation. Patients with BE and/or IP were older and had higher BMI than those without (p < 0.001). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower and mean acid exposure time (AET) was higher in patients with IP and/or BE than those without (p < 0.05). Our study reports an IP prevalence of 1.3%, with 17.1% patients having concomitant BE; and a BE prevalence of 4.9%, with 4.6% also having IP. Patients with IP alone presented with similar symptoms to patients with concomitant BE. Esophageal function testing showed that patients with either IP or BE had decreased LES pressures and increased esophageal AET. During endoscopy, patients found to have one of these findings should be carefully examined for the other.

Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with acute rejection after lung transplantation independent of gastroesophageal reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux is associated with poorer outcomes after lung transplant, likely through recurrent aspiration and allograft injury. Although prior studies have demonstrated a relationship between impedance-pH results and transplant outcomes, the role of esophageal manometry in the assessment of lung transplant patients remains debated, and the impact of esophageal dysmotility on transplant outcomes is unclear. Of particular interest is ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and its associated impact on esophageal clearance. To assess the relationship between pre-transplant IEM diagnosis and acute rejection after lung transplantation. This was a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients at a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2018. Patients with pre-transplant anti-reflux surgery were excluded. Manometric and reflux diagnoses were recorded from pre-transplant esophageal function testing. Time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate outcome of first episode of acute cellular rejection, defined histologically per International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. Subjects not meeting this endpoint were censored at time of post-transplant anti-reflux surgery, last clinic visit, or death. Fisher's exact test for binary variables and student's t-test for continuous variables were performed to assess for differences between groups. Of 184 subjects (54% men, mean age: 58, follow-up: 443 person-years) met criteria for inclusion. Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis represented the predominant pulmonary diagnosis (41%). During the follow-up period, 60 subjects (33.5%) developed acute rejection. The all-cause mortality was 16.3%. Time-to-event univariate analyses demonstrated significant association between IEM and acute rejection [hazard ratio (HR): 1.984, 95%CI: 1.03-3.30, P = 0.04], confirmed on Kaplan-Meier curve. On multivariable analysis, IEM remained independently associated with acute rejection, even after controlling for potential confounders such as the presence of acid and nonacid reflux (HR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.18-4.11, P = 0.01). Nonacid reflux was also independently associated with acute rejection on both univariate (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.26-3.72, P = 0.005) and multivariable analyses (HR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.21-3.64, P = 0.009), adjusting for the presence of IEM. Pre-transplant IEM was associated with acute rejection after transplantation, even after controlling for acid and nonacid reflux. Esophageal motility testing may be considered in lung transplant to predict outcomes.

Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Scopes Beyond PPI

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common GI disorder where the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus causes symptom generation. PPI is the principal weapon to fight against GERD. An empiric course of PPI therapy is a cost-effective strategy for managing GERD. But sometimes, PPI can only do so much if taken correctly. As PPI does not reduce the number of reflux, other measures, including lifestyle modification, are required to get relief of GERD symptoms. Most patients respond to 8 weeks of PPI therapy, but 20-40% do not respond or respond partially. While these patients are labeled as having refractory heartburn, many do not have GERD or have not been treated adequately. So, alternative etiology must be considered when patients are refractory to PPI. Endoscopy of upper GIT should be done initially in case of the presence of alarm symptoms and when considered refractory to exclude other conditions. If endoscopy reveals no abnormality, then esophageal function tests like esophageal manometry, 24 hrs ambulatory pH monitoring, and mucosal impedance test can be considered to exclude other related conditions. Endoscopic and surgical treatment options can also be considered in particular cases. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2022; 31(1) : 148-157

Esophageal high-resolution manometry demands visual interpretation in addition to mathematical software-based analysis

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) revolutionized esophageal function testing due to the intuitive colorful and agreeable-to-the-eyes plots (Clouse plots). HRM execution and interpretation is guided by the Chicago Classification. The well-established metrics for interpretation allows a reliable automatic software analysis. Analysis based on these mathematical parameters, however, ignores the valuable visual interpretation unique to human eyes and based on expertise. We compiled some situations where visual interpretation added useful information for HRM interpretation. Visual interpretation may be useful in cases of hypomotility, premature waves, artifacts, segmental abnormalities of peristalsis, and extra-luminal non-contractile findings. These extra findings can be reported apart from the conventional parameters.

The Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Gradient and the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in the Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: an Analysis of 500 Esophageal Function Tests

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathophysiology is multifactorial. Greater importance has been attributed to a defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in comparison to an altered transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient (TPG). This study aims to evaluate the role of the TPG and LES disfunction in GERD pathogenesis. MethodsFive hundred consecutive esophageal function tests from patients with clinically suspected GERD were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the pH monitoring in GERD positive or GERD negative. Abdominal pressure, thoracic pressure, TPG (abdominal-thoracic pressures), LES resting pressure (mid-respiratory, expiratory, and EGJ-CI), and LES retention pressure (LES resting pressure-TPG) were determined. ResultsGERD was present in 296 (59%) individuals. GERD-positive patients were mostly males. LES resting pressure (by all parameters) and thoracic pressure were not different between groups. Abdominal pressure and TPG were higher in GERD-positive patients. LES retention pressure (by all parameters) was lower in GERD-positive patients. DeMeester score had a positive correlation with LES resting pressure, TPG, and LES retention pressure (by all parameters) but not with abdominal pressure and thoracic pressure. ConclusionsLES valvular competency as measured by absolute resting pressure was not reliable to predict GERD; however, it was associated with GERD severity. Relative LES pressure (LES retention pressure) predicted GERD presence and severity, but no parameter showed superiority. TPG plays an important role in the pathophysiology of GERD since it is related to GERD presence and severity; still TPG is altered mostly based on a higher abdominal pressure.

Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance and Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic Wave Index Could Identify Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease but pH-Impedance Metrics Alone Might Not Correlate With Proton Pump Inhibitor Response in Chinese Patients With Typical Reflux Symptoms.

Background/AimsLyon consensus differentiates acid exposure time (AET) as physiological, borderline, and pathological. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWi) are believed to increase diagnostic yield of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and correlate with symptom outcome of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. We aim to explore the clinical characteristics and the correlation of pH-impedance parameters with PPI response in Chinese patients with different AET levels.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 177 patients with typical reflux symptoms who received esophageal function tests. The demographics, GERD questionnaire scores, the proportion of esophagitis and PPI responders, and manometric and pH-impedance parameters were compared among patients with AET < 4%, 4-6%, and > 6%. In patients with AET ≥ 4%, manometric and pH-impedance parameters were compared between PPI responders and non-responders.ResultsAmong 177 patients, 69 (39.0%) had AET 4-6%, and 53 (29.9%) had AET > 6%. The demographics, esophagogastric junction type, and occurrence of ineffective esophageal motility were similar between patients with AET 4-6% and > 6%, but different from AET < 4%. MNBI and PSPWi were different among different AET levels, but similar between PPI responders and non-responders in patients with AET ≥ 4%.ConclusionsIt is reasonable to set 4% as a threshold to define pathological AET in Chinese patients. MNBI and PSPWi could identify GERD patients, but may not correlate with PPI response of Chinese GERD patients.

Organizing and Developing a GI Motility Lab in Community Practice: Challenges and Rewards.

Neurogastroenterology and motility is a rapidly evolving subspecialty that encompasses over 33% of gastroenterological disorders, and up to 50% of referrals to gastroenterology practice. It includes common problems such as dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, gas/bloating, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, food intolerance and fecal incontinence Standard diagnostic tests such as endoscopy or imaging are normal in these conditions. To define the underlying mechanism(s)/etiology of these disorders, diagnostic motility tests are often required. These are best performed by well-trained personnel in a dedicated motility laboratory. Our purpose is to provide an up-to-date overview on how to organize and develop a motility laboratory based on our collective experiences in setting up such facilities in academia and community practice. A lack of knowledge, training and facilities for providing diagnostic motility tests has led to suboptimal patient care. A motility laboratory is the hub for diagnostic and therapeutic motility procedures. Common procedures include esophageal function tests such as esophageal manometry and pH monitoring, anorectal function tests suchlike anorectal manometry, neurophysiology and balloon expulsion, dysbiosis and food intolerance tests such as hydrogen/methane breath tests, and gastrointestinal transit assessment. These tests provide an accurate diagnosis and guide clinical management including use of medications, biofeedback therapy, neuromodulation, behavioral therapies, evidence-based dietary interventions and endoscopic or surgical procedures. Further, there have been recent developments in billing and coding of motility procedures and training requirements that are not well known. This review provides a stepwise approach on how to set-up a motility laboratory in the community or academic practice and includes the rationale, infrastructure, staffing needs, commonly performed motility tests and their clinical utility, billing and coding strategies, training needs and economic considerations for setting up this service.

Role of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Pediatric Patients.

PurposeDysphagia, vomiting and feeding difficulties are common symptoms, with which children present. Esophageal function testing with high resolution manometry can help in diagnosing and treating these patients. We aim to access the clinical utility of high-resolution manometry of esophagus in symptomatic pediatric patients.MethodsA retrospective chart review was done on all symptomatic patients who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry between 2010 and 2019 at Sydney Children’s Hospital, Australia. Manometry results were categorized based on Chicago classification. Demographic data, indication of procedure, manometric findings, and details of treatment changes were obtained and analyzed.ResultsThere were 62 patients with median age of 10 years (9 months–18 years). The main indication for the procedure was dysphagia (56%). Thirty-two percent of patients had a co-morbid condition, with esophageal atresia accounting for 16%. The majority (77%) of patients had abnormal manometry which included, ineffective esophageal motility in 45.2%. In esophageal atresia cohort, esophageal pressurization was seen in 50%, aperistalsis in 40% and 10% with prior fundoplication had esophago-gastric junction obstruction. Patients with esophago-gastric junction obstruction or achalasia were treated by either pneumatic dilation or Heller’s myotomy. Patients with ineffective esophageal motility and rumination were treated with a trial of prokinetics/dietary texture modification and diaphragmatic breathing.ConclusionEsophageal high-resolution manometry has a role in the evaluation of symptomatic pediatric patients. The majority of our patients had abnormal results which led to change in treatments, with either medication, surgery and/or feeding modification with resultant improvement in symptoms.

Devices for esophageal function testing.

Background and AimsEsophageal function testing is an integral component of the evaluation of refractory GERD and esophageal motility disorders. This review summarizes the current technologies available for esophageal function testing, including the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP), high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) and pH monitoring.MethodsWe performed a MEDLINE, PubMed, and MAUDE database literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies through March 2021 using the following key words: esophageal manometry, HRM, esophageal impedance, FLIP, MII, and esophageal pH testing. Technical data were gathered from traditional and web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. The report was drafted, reviewed, and edited by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Committee and approved by the Governing Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.ResultsFLIP is a high-resolution impedance planimetry system used for pressure and dimension measurement in the esophagus, pylorus, and anal sphincter. FLIP provides complementary information to HRM for esophageal motility disorders, especially achalasia. The Chicago classification, based on HRM data, is a widely adopted algorithmic scheme used to diagnose esophageal motility disorders. MII detects intraluminal bolus movement and, combined with pH measurement or manometry, provides information on acid and non-acid gastroesophageal reflux and bolus transit in patients with refractory GERD and for preoperative evaluation for anti-reflux procedures.ConclusionsEsophageal function testing techniques (FLIP, HRM, and MII-pH) have diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of esophageal motility disorders and refractory GERD. Newer technologies and classification systems have enabled an increased understanding of these diseases.

The Value of Esophageal Function Testing in Antireflux Surgery

The Value of Esophageal Function Testing in Antireflux Surgery

The level of impaired esophageal bolus transit measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance: Cross-sectional study

BackgroundEsophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are often diagnosed manometrically, yet the underlying pathology is not always clear. Esophageal function testing (EFT), which incorporates manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII), is considered a useful tool in the assessment of EMDs. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the most likely level of impaired bolus transit within the esophagus which may help further localize and characterize EMDs. MethodsIn a retrospective study design, we reviewed consecutive EFTs over a period of 12 months. Data included diagnosis, presenting symptoms, and EFT results of liquid and viscous swallows. Each patient underwent 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows, and bolus transit is measured at 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). We recorded the initial level of impaired bolus transit for each swallow. ResultsA total of 2358 swallows in 118 patients was included for analysis. Of these, 837 swallows (35.5%) were incompletely transmitted. The proportions of impaired bolus transit were 39%, 41%, 15.6%, 4.4% at 20 cm, 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm above the GEJ, respectively. The common symptoms at presentation were dysphagia (47%), heartburn (44%), chest pain (24.6%) and regurgitation (18%). The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was 24 ± 13.9 mmHg whereas the mean contraction amplitude was 84 ± 46.6 mmHg. ConclusionIn patients with abnormal esophageal clearance, the most likely levels of impaired bolus transit are 15 and 20 cm above the GEJ. These levels of the esophagus should be a focus of attention in future studies evaluating the pathophysiology of esophageal dysmotility.

Does Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Really Cure Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease? Analysis of Objective Data.

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is considered the treatment of choice for obesity with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). There are few reports showing objective data based on esophageal function tests (EFTs). The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of LRYGB on GERD. Methods: Candidates for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) underwent preoperative esophageal manometry (EM) and 24-hour pH monitoring. Based on the negative influence of LSG on GERD, patients with abnormal pH were offered LRYGB. Those patients repeated EFTs, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and symptom questionnaire 1 year after surgery. Results: Two hundred fifty LSG candidates underwent preoperative EFTs; 38% were redirected to LRYGB due to abnormal pH and 13 (18%) completed EFTs postoperatively. In ten women, age: 40 ± 7 years, body mass index: 41 ± 1 kg/m2. EM: lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length increased from 2.6 to 2.9 cm (P = not statistically significant [NS]), and LES pressure decreased from 15 to 14.2 mmHg (P = NS). Preoperatively, LES was normotensive in 12 (92%) patients and postoperatively in 11 (85%) (P = NS). DeMeester score decreased from 35.7 to 11 (P < .001). Postoperatively, 9 (69%) patients resolved their GERD, 3 (23%) improved, and 1 (8%) remained the same (P < .001). Symptoms decreased significantly after surgery. Two patients (15%) had Grade A esophagitis. One of them was able to resolve it, while the other 1 remained the same. Conclusions: Our preliminary data showed that after LRYGB, LES pressure remained the same and DeMeester score decreased, while 69% of patients resolved their GERD. Therefore, LRYGB seems to be an excellent option for obesity and GERD.

An Impetus for Change: How COVID-19 Will Transform the Delivery of GI Health Care

An Impetus for Change: How COVID-19 Will Transform the Delivery of GI Health Care

Pharmacological Treatments of Esophageal Dysphagia

Patients with esophageal dysphagia need a step-by-step approach for diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopic with biopsy and barium esophagogram are the essential tests evaluating anatomical abnormality and esophageal bolus stasis. Further imaging or esophageal function tests such as high-resolution esophageal manometry, functional endoluminal imaging probe, CT or endoscopic ultrasound are required. In the case of dysphagia due to esophageal motility disorder, whether it is the major motility disorder or minor motility disorder should be identified in high resolution manometry. Major motility disorders show esophagogastric junction obstruction or major peristaltic defects. In this case, the severity of the symptoms should be assessed and patients who need endoscopic or surgical treatment targeting lower esophageal sphincter should be screened. Impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, esophageal spasm or abnormal hypercontraction (jackhammer esophagus), hypotensive contraction (ineffective esophageal motility, failed peristalsis), esophageal hypersensitivity (noncardiac chest pain), gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal bolus stasis are the possible mechanisms causing dysphagia symptoms. The proper medical treatment depends on underlying mechanisms.