Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection with gel immersion technique for superficial esophageal neoplasms.

Gel immersion (GI) endoscopy provides a good visual field in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, its clinical outcomes are poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between esophageal gel immersion endoscopic submucosal dissection (GI-ESD) and conventional ESD (C-ESD) to determine the safety and efficacy of GI-ESD. The data of 71 consecutive patients who underwent esophageal ESD between April 2021 and March 2023 at a Japanese tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. GI was achieved using an additional irrigation tube. The treatment outcomes between the GI-ESD and C-ESD groups were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to control for confounding factors. A total of 75 superficial esophageal epithelial neoplasms (41 in the C-ESD and 34 in the GI-ESD groups) were treated using ESD. The mean procedure time in the GI-ESD group was significantly shorter than that in the C-ESD group (59.2±36.2 vs 85.3±45.7min, P=0.008). After IPTW adjustment, the mean procedural times were 62.6±36.6 and 82.9±41.7min in the GI-ESD and C-ESD groups, respectively (P=0.037), and the incidence rate of muscle layer damage was 4.2% in the GI-ESD group and 30.6% in the C-ESD group (P=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, specimen size ≥30mm (odds ratio [OR]: 9.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-36.30, P=0.001) was positively correlated with longer procedural time (≥90min), whereas GI-ESD (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.05-0.68, P=0.011) showed a negative association. Esophageal GI-ESD may be useful in terms of safety and time efficiency. The GI technique could be an option for esophageal ESD.

Effect of sprayable, highly adhesive hydrophobized gelatin microparticles on esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection: an experimental study in a swine model.

Esophageal mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer can lead to postoperative esophageal stricture, with current preventive measures being insufficient. Sprayable wound dressings containing hydrophobized microparticles exhibit strong adhesion. This study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of hydrophobized microparticles on esophageal stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Circumferential esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed on miniature swine (n = 6). Swine were categorized into two groups: those sprayed with hydrophobized microparticles (sprayed group) and those not sprayed (non-sprayed group). Hydrophobized microparticles were sprayed onto the sprayed group on Days 0, 3, and 7 of endoscopic submucosal dissection. The non-sprayed group underwent endoscopy on the same days. Esophageal stricture rate, submucosal inflammatory cell infiltration, submucosal fibrosis, and thickening of the muscular layer were compared between the groups on Day 14 of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Spraying of hydrophobized microparticles was easily performed using an existing endoscopic spraying device. The esophageal stricture rate was significantly lower in the sprayed group than in the non-sprayed group (76.1% versus 90.6%, p < 0.05). The sprayed group showed suppression of inflammatory cell infiltration in the submucosal layer (p < 0.01) and thickening of the muscular layer (p < 0.01). Sprayable tissue-adhesive hydrophobized microparticles reduce the stricture rate after esophageal ESD by inhibiting inflammatory cell infiltration, submucosal fibrosis, and thickening of the muscular layer. The use of hydrophobized microparticles for preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal stenosis offers a promising avenue for clinical applications in endoscopic procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Nasogastric tube combined with thin therapeutic endoscope to facilitate esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Nasogastric tube combined with thin therapeutic endoscope to facilitate esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Characteristics of cases for which esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia is recommended.

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed under general anesthesia can potentially provide more stable treatment in difficult cases than that under sedation. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ESD performed under general anesthesia compared with those under propofol sedation and discussed the cases in which general anesthesia is recommended. In total, 292 lesions in 265 consecutive patients undergoing esophageal ESD at Yamaguchi University Hospital from 2013 to 2023 were included in this retrospective study. ESD was performed under general anesthesia for 92 lesions in 81 patients and under propofol sedation for 200 lesions in 184 patients. Tumor long-axis diameter was larger (39.8 ± 14.4mm vs. 32.4 ± 9.9mm, p < 0.01) and dissection speed was faster (10.5 ± 5.9 mm2/min vs. 7.5 ± 4.2 mm2/min, p < 0.01) in the general anesthesia group versus the sedation group. In the sedation group, a treatment history of pharyngeal cancer was significantly associated with a slower dissection speed (p = 0.037). The sedation group showed higher frequencies of hypoxemia (0% vs 9.8%, p < 0.01), interruption due to body movement (0% vs 13%, p < 0.01), and acute adverse events (21.7% vs 33.5%, p = 0.05). A treatment history of pharyngeal cancer was shown to be the significant factor contributing to acute adverse events (p = 0.018). Esophageal ESD under general anesthesia can be a treatment option in patients with difficulty in performing stable procedures with propofol sedation. Especially in patients with a treatment history of pharyngeal cancer in whom ESD is more difficult to be performed and who are at higher risk for acute adverse events, general anesthesia can be considered.

Predictors of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus and steroids application.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method to resect early esophageal cancer. Esophageal stricture is one of the major complications after ESD of the esophagus. Steroid prophylaxis for esophageal strictures, particularly local injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), is a relatively effective method to prevent esophageal strictures. However, even with steroid prophylaxis, stenosis still occurs in up to 45% of patients. Predicting the risk of stenosis formation after local TA injection would enable additional interventions in risky patients. To identify the predictors of esophageal strictures after steroids application. Patients who underwent esophageal ESD and steroid prophylaxis and who were comprehensively assessed for lesion- and ESD-related factors at Southeast University Affiliated Zhongda Hospital between February 2018 and March 2023 were included in the study. The univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of stricture among patients undergoing steroid prophylaxis. A total of 120 patients were included in the analysis. In the oral prednisone and oral prednisone combined with local tretinoin injection groups, the stenosis rates were 44/53 (83.0%) and 56/67 (83.6%), respectively. Among them, univariate analysis showed that the lesion circumference (P = 0.01) and submucosal injection solution (P = 0.04) showed significant correlation with the risk of stenosis formation. Logistic regression analyses were then performed using predictors that were significant in the univariate analyses and combined with known predictors from previous reports, such as additional chemoradiotherapy and tumor location. We identified a lesion circumference < 5/6 (OR = 0.19; P = 0.02) and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate (OR = 0.15; P = 0.03) as independent predictors of on esophageal stricture formation. Steroid prophylaxis effectively prevents stenosis. Moreover, the lesion circumference and submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate were independent predictors of esophageal strictures. Additional interventions should be considered in high-risk patients.

Usefulness of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is sometimes challenging because of stenosis and scarring. We examined the use of an ultrathin endoscope for esophageal ESD, which is difficult using conventional endoscopes. Patients and methods A designated transparent hood and ESD knife for ultrathin endoscopes have been developed and clinically introduced. Esophageal ESD was performed on 303 lesions in 220 patients in our hospital from February 2021 to February 2023. Of them, an ultrathin endoscope was used on 26 lesions in 23 cases. The safety and utility of an ultrathin endoscope in esophageal ESD were retrospectively verified. Results All 26 lesions were resected en bloc, and serious complications such as perforation, massive bleeding, or pneumonia, were not observed. Lesions were found on the anal side of the stenosis and over the scarring in 38.6% (10/26) and 50% (13/26) of participants, respectively. Moreover, 46.2% of participants (12/26) had lesions on the cervical esophagus. The total procedure time was 64.1 ± 37.7 minutes, but the average time from oral incision to pocket creation was 121.2 ± 109.9 seconds. Conclusions Ultrathin endoscopes may be useful for difficult esophageal ESD.

318. EFFICACY OF PROPHYLACTIC STEROID THERAPY OF INJECTION AND ADMINISTRATION AGAINST STRICTURE FOR SUBENTIRE CIRCUMFERENTIAL DEFECT AFTER ESOPHAGEAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION

Abstract Background Esophageal stricture is a major problem after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SESCC). Local triamcinolone injection (LTI) has been reported as the standard prophylactic treatment against stricture, however, it showed that its efficacy was insufficient for subentire circumferential mucosal defect after ESD in the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trial (JCOG1217). On the other hand, the usefulness of oral prednisolone administration (OPA) has also been reported. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy of LTI with combination of LTI and OPA in patients with subentire circumferential mucosal defect after esophageal ESD. Methods This retrospective study enrolled the patients with mucosal defect after ESD larger than 7/8th circumference and not spreading entire who treated with LTI or combination of LTI and OPA between July 2010 to January 2020. Triamcinolone acetonide (50-100 mg) was injected into ulcer bed immediately after ESD, and oral prednisolone (30 mg daily, tapered gradually for 8 weeks) was administrated. We defined as an esophageal stricture in case the endoscope could not pass through the stricture, and then endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) was required. We evaluated stricture-free survival (SFS), and the number and duration of EBD. Results A total of 42 patients in the LTI group and 26 in the combination group were enrolled. The median longitudinal extension of the lesions was 4.5 cm (range; 2-7) in the LTI group and 4 cm (2-7) in the combination group. Finally, 18 patients (42.9%) in the LTI group and 7 (26.9%) in the combination group developed esophageal stricture, and 12-week SFS was 64.3% and 76.9%. The median number and duration of required ESD were 6 (2-10) in the LTI group and 4 (2-9) in the combination group, and 88 days (15-288) and 66 days (22-176). Conclusion The steroid combination therapy of local triamcinolone injection and oral prednisolone administration showed the effective outcomes comparing with local triamcinolone injection alone for subentire circumferential mucosal defect after esophageal ESD. Thus, this combination therapy can be the most promising treatment and should be compared in the randomized controlled trail with large sample size.

More efficient endoscopic submucosal dissection with deep endotracheal intubation for superficial cervical esophageal carcinoma: a dual-center, prospective, randomized controlled study

Deep endotracheal intubation (DET) has been proposed to improve cervical esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) because of the limited space and visibility. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DET. In the current dual-center trial, patients were randomized into DET or conventional endotracheal intubation (CET) groups. Complete resection rate, operation time, and adverse events were measured and compared. Fifty-nine patients (60 lesions) were assigned to the groups, showing comparable baseline characteristics. The complete resection rates were similarly high in both groups. However, DET significantly reduced ESD operation time (52.2 minutes vs 71.1 minutes, P< .001) and postoperative pain scores (3.1 vs 4.7, P< .01). Severe stenosis occurred more frequently in the CET patients (20% vs 0%, P= .035). No significant differences were observed in other adverse events. DET can overcome technical challenges to improve therapeutic efficiency and safety. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT06420258.).

Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection close to the initial endoscopic submucosal dissection scar for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for metachronous recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma close to previous endoscopic submucosal dissection scars is challenging. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The study included 1680 patients. After propensity score matching, esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection-related outcomes were compared between the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar group (n = 91) and first endoscopic submucosal dissection group (n = 910). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare both groups' survival and local recurrence curves. After propensity score matching, the two groups showed no significant difference in en bloc resection rate (97.80% vs. 99.56%, p = 0.096), treatment time (64.75min vs 61.33min, p = 0.448), recurrence rate (3.30% vs. 2.20%, p = 0.458), and stricture rate (7.69% vs. 4.07%, p = 0.110). However, the perforation rate was higher in the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar group than in the first endoscopic submucosal dissection group (4.40% vs. 1.10%, p = 0.031). The 5-year overall survival rates in the post-endoscopic submucosal dissection scar and first endoscopic submucosal dissection groups were 88.6% and 89.0%, respectively. Repeated esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes and survival rates. Therefore, repeat endoscopic submucosal dissection may effectively treat esophageal squamous cell carcinoma recurrence close to the initial endoscopic submucosal dissection scars.

Continuous cuff pressure control on middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus effect of airway injury.

Assessment of the effect of continuous cuff pressure control on airway injury in middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A total of 104 eligible middle-aged and elderly patients requiring esophageal ESD from July 2022-September 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the group undergoing general anesthesia tracheal intubation with continuous control of cuff pressure after intubation (Group A, n = 51) and the group undergoing general anesthesia tracheal intubation with continuous monitoring without control of cuff pressure (Group B, n = 53). After endotracheal intubation in Group A, under the guidance of an automatic cuff pressure controller, the air was used to inflate the tracheal cuff until the cuff pressure was 25-30cmH2O. The cuff pressure after intubation was recorded, and then the cuff pressure parameters were directly adjusted in the range of 25-30cmH2O until tracheal extubation after the operation. After endotracheal intubation, patients in Group B inflated the tracheal cuff with clinical experience, then monitored and recorded the cuff pressure with a handheld cuff manometer and instructed the cuff not to be loosened after being connected to the handheld cuff manometer-continuous monitoring until the tracheal extubation, but without any cuff pressure regulation. The patients of the two groups performed esophageal ESD. The left recumbent position was taken before the operation, and the cuff's pressure was recorded. Then, insert the gastrointestinal endoscope to find the lesion site and perform appropriate CO2 inflation to display the diseased esophageal wall for surgical operation fully. After determining the location, the cuff pressure of the two groups was recorded when the cuff pressure was stable. After the operation, the upper gastrointestinal endoscope was removed and the cuff pressure of the two groups was recorded. Postoperative airway injury assessment was performed in both groups, and the incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, cough, and blood in sputum was recorded. The incidence of postoperative airway mucosal injury was also observed and recorded in both groups: typical, episodic congestion spots and patchy local congestion. The incidence of normal airway mucosa in Group A was higher than that in Group B (P < 0.05). In comparison, the incidence of occasional hyperemia and local plaque congestion in Group A was lower than in Group B (P < 0.05). Continuous cuff pressure control during operation can reduce airway injury in patients with esophageal ESD and accelerate their early recovery after the operation.

Intensive triamcinolone acetonide injection regimen can highly prevent stricture after extensive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background This study aimed to investigate the utility of intensive triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections after extensive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This retrospective study included 27 lesions in 27 consecutive patients who underwent ESD (ulcers encompassing ≥3/4 of the esophageal circumference) and received TA injections without oral steroid administration. Groups A and B included patients undergoing ESD with and without complete circumferential resection, respectively. All patients received TA injections (100 mg/session) immediately after ESD. In Group A, weekly based TA injections were performed until near-complete ulcer epithelialization. In Group B, patients did not receive additional injections or received weekly or biweekly TA injections. The primary outcome was stricture rate, and the secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients requiring endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and the number of TA injections. Results Group A included 7 lesions, and Group B included 20 lesions. The median (range) tumor lengths were 40 (30–90) and 45 (30–110) mm in Groups A and B, respectively. In Group A, the median circumferential resection diameter was 40 (20–80) mm. The stricture rate and the proportion of patients requiring EBD were 0 (0%) in Group A and 1 (5.0%) in Group B. The number of TA injection sessions was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (8 [5–25] vs 1.5 [1–3]; p < 0.001). Conclusions Intensive weekly or biweekly based TA injections might aid in preventing post-ESD stricture and the need for EBD in patients undergoing extensive resection involving the entire esophageal circumference.

Association of local steroid injection as a risk factor for electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Postendoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is commonly observed after performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasia. However, data on the incidence and risk factors for PEECS in the esophagus are lacking due to an unclear definition of PEECS and varied clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to determine the risk factors for PEECS in patients undergoing ESD for esophageal neoplasia. We retrospectively reviewed data of relevant clinical and endoscopy-specific parameters from 202 consecutive patients with esophageal neoplasias (139 carcinomas and 63 dysplasias) who underwent ESD under general anesthesia. Esophageal PEECS was defined by satisfying at least two of the following criteria: fever ≥ 37.8°C, leukocytosis ≥ 10,800/mm3, and localized chest pain ≥ 5/10 points as assessed on a numeric rating scale within 24h after ESD. Significant factors associated with PEECS were determined by regression analysis. PEECS was recorded in 98 of 202 (48.5%) patients. Patients with PEECS exhibited a larger tumor size (25.0 vs. 17.0mm, P = 0.002), longer procedure (40.0 vs. 29.5min, P = 0.021) and hemostasis times (5.0 vs. 3.5min, P = 0.004), required greater submucosal injection volume (60.0mL vs. 50.0mL, P = 0.030), and had a lower rate of local steroid injection (4.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.029) than those without PEECS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed tumor size ≥ 17mm (P = 0.047), procedure time ≥ 33min (P = 0.027), and hemostasis time ≥ 5min (P = 0.007) as risk factors for PEECS. In addition, local steroid injection was a significant negatively associated factor (P = 0.001). Patients with a large tumor, prolonged procedure and hemostasis times are at a high risk of PEECS occurrence. Further, local steroid injection is a negatively associated factor.

Dexmedetomidine-pethidine combination for sedation during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Dexmedetomidine-pethidine combination for sedation during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Long-term prognosis and DNA damage status after oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet transplantation following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for squamous cell carcinoma: A case series

Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet (AOMECS) transplantation has recently been applied in human patients to prevent postprocedural stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the long-term safety of AOMECS transplantation remains unclear. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of 10 patients who participated in a clinical trial of AOMECS transplantation after esophageal ESD. Additionally, we assessed the local DNA damage response in the esophageal epithelium using p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) immunofluorescence in post-AOMECS biopsy specimens. The median follow-up period was 118.5 months (range: 46–130 months). Two patients developed primary esophageal cancer near the AOMECS site and successfully underwent additional ESD. One patient developed lymph node metastasis and underwent chemotherapy. None of the patients died from the original disease, although one patient died from unrelated causes. The rate of abnormal 53BP1 nuclear foci, indicative of increased genome instability, increased with the progression of neoplasia in patients post AOMECS. Our case series suggests that AOMECS transplantation provides an acceptable long-term prognosis and 53BP1 foci may serve as a useful marker for assessing DNA instability in the post-AOMECS esophageal epithelium.

Safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation.

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett's neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Data from patients at 16 centers were collected for a multicenter retrospective study. Patients who underwent at least one RFA treatment for Barrett's esophagus and thereafter underwent further esophageal ESD for neoplasia recurrence were included. Data from 56 patients who underwent salvage ESD between April 2014 and November 2022 were collected. Immediate complications included one muscular tear (1.8%) treated with stent (Agree classification: grade IIIa). Two transmural perforations (3.6%; treated with clips) and five muscular tears (8.9%; two treated with clips) had no clinical impact and were not considered as adverse events. Seven patients (12.5%) developed strictures (grade IIIa), which were treated with balloon dilation. Histological analysis showed 36 adenocarcinoma, 17 high grade dysplasia, and 3 low grade dysplasia. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 89.3% and 66.1%, respectively. Resections were curative in 33 patients (58.9%), and noncurative in 22 patients (39.3%), including 11 "local risk" (19.6%) and 11 "high risk" (19.6%) resections. At the end of follow-up with a median time of 14 (0-75) months after salvage ESD, and with further endoscopic treatment if necessary (RFA, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD), neoplasia remission ratio was 37/53 (69.8%) and the median remission time was 13 (1-75) months. In expert hands, salvage ESD was a safe and effective treatment for recurrence of Barrett's neoplasia after RFA treatment.

Injury to the Muscle Layer and Risk of Non-cardiac Chest Pain after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Cancer.

Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a frequent complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early-stage esophageal cancer. However, little is known about relationships between ESD findings and NCCP. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for NCCP, including ESD findings related to injury to the muscle layer. We enrolled a total of 296 lesions from 270 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), who underwent ESD in our center. The grade of injury to the muscle layer caused by ESD was categorized as follows: grade 0: no exposure of muscularis propria; grade 1: muscularis propria exposure and/or whitish color change by the electrocoagulation; grade 2: torn muscularis propria with whitish color change by the electrocoagulation; and grade 3, esophageal perforation. The risk factors for NCCP, including ESD findings, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. NCCP occurred in 89 patients (33.0%) after esophageal ESD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.92-0.98, p=0.003), postoperative fever (>= 38°C) (OR=25.9, 95%CI: 2.89-232.10, p=0.004), ESD findings (grade 1: OR=3.99, 95%CI: 1.63-9.75, p=0.003 and grade 2: OR=3.18, 95%CI: 1.54-6.57, p=0.002) were independently associated with the incidence of post ESD NCCP. ESD findings relate to slight Injury to the muscle layer, such as muscularis propria exposure and whitish color change by the electrocoagulation were identified as risk factor for post ESD NCCP. We should therefore perform esophageal ESD carefully to avoid injuring the muscle layers.

Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult. We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates. Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively. Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

Self-expandable metallic stents may be more efficient than balloon dilatation alone for esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective cohort study in China.

Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) can be used to treat esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but its efficacy and placement timing remain to be determined. In this study, the treatment time and number of dilatations were compared between the SEMS placement group and the balloon dilatation (BD) group to clarify the efficacy and placement time of SEMSs in the treatment of esophageal stricture after circumferential esophageal ESD. This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. Data on the patients' demographic characteristics, esophageal lesion-related factors, esophageal stricture occurrence, and measures taken to treat the stricture were collected. The primary outcome was the treatment time, and the secondary outcome was the number of dilatations. The total number of dilatations was 30 in the SEMS group and 106 in the BD group. The average number of dilatations in the SEMS group (1.76 ± 1.64) was significantly lower than that in the BD group (4.42 ± 5.32) (P = 0.016). Among the patients who underwent SEMS placement first had a shorter treatment time (average 119days) than those who underwent BD first (average 245days) (P = 0.041), and the average number of dilatations inpatients who underwent SEMS placement first (0.71 ± 1.07) was significantly lower than that in the patients who underwent BD first (2.5 ± 1.54). SEMSs were more efficient in the treatment of esophageal stricture in a cohort of patients after circumferential esophageal ESD.

Nomogram for predicting electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was widely used for the removal of esophageal tumors, and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) was one of the postoperative adverse events. The aim of this research was to develop and validate a model to predict electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal tumors. Patients who underwent esophageal ESD in our hospital were retrospectively included. A predictive nomogram was established based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, and bootstrapping resampling was used for internal validation. Besides, the clinical usefulness of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve. A total of 552 patients who underwent esophageal ESD were included in the study, and the incidence of PPECS was 12.5% (69/552). Risk factors associated with PEECS (p < 0.1) were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the final model included four variables, namely gender, diabetes, tumor size and operation time. The predictive nomogram was constructed based on the above four variables, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.811 (95% CI 0.767-0.855). The calibration curve of the nomogram presented good agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities. DCA showed that the model improved patient outcomes by helping to assess the risk of PEECS in patients compared to an all-or-no treatment strategy. In addition, the clinical impact curve of the model also indicates that the nomogram has a high clinical net benefit. In conclusion, we have developed a predictive nomogram for PEECS after ESD for esophageal tumors with good predictive accuracy and discrimination. This predictive nomogram can be effectively used to identify high-risk patients with PEECS, which will help clinicians in clinical decision-making and early intervention.

Feasibility of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection after radiofrequency ablation treatment in patients with Barrett’s esophagus

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a well-established treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) in the United States. Similarly, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely performed for early esophageal carcinoma. However, conducting ESD after RFA can be technically challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of ESD in patients with prior RFA. This study was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent esophageal ESD after undergoing prior RFA treatment for BE. Of 44 esophageal ESD cases, 7 underwent prior RFA. In those 7 cases, the en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 86%. No acute or delayed adverse events or rehospitalizations occurred in any patient. ESD may be a feasible and safe option for patients with a history of RFA. It could be considered for esophageal neoplasms in patients previously treated with RFA for BE.