The presence of erm(T) gene conferring resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B (MLSB), was screened in 296 enterococci collected from clinical samples in a central Italy hospital and seven Enterococcus faecium isolates resulted positive to erm(T) by PCR. All isolates were resistant to erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and ampicillin but susceptible to vancomycin and chloramphenicol. Whole Genome Sequencing analysis revealed that in five E. faecium isolates, all belonging to the sequence type ST80 included in the clonal complex CC17 responsible of nosocomial infections, erm (T) gene was chromosome-located, in different genetic contexts. In E. faecium 735,236, erm (T) was on a 4,159-bp region flanked by two IS1216 and inserted at the 3' end of the mp gene. In E. faecium 711,448 and 739,437, erm (T) was found in a 4,463-bp region identical to that detected in E. faecium 735,236 except for 319bp. In E. faecium 713,729 and 757,415, erm (T) was on a 7,038-bp region flanked by IS1251 and ISEfm2 transposases and encompassed between the genes encoding a recombinase and three hypothetical proteins. erm(T)-carrying minicircles were detected in all isolates by inverse PCR assays demonstrating that erm(T) was included in mobile elements. However, in conjugation assays by filter mating, the erm(T) transferability was unsuccessful. Although macrolides are not used to treat enterococcal infections, the resistance is nonetheless widespread. These antibiotics are critically important in human medicine, but only few studies focused on erm (T)-harbouring clinical enterococci. The emergence of erm (T)-mediated erythromycin resistance among enterococci, potentially transferable to other nosocomial pathogens, should be constantly monitored.
Read full abstract