ERalpha DNA-binding Domain Research Articles

Isolation of Novel Isoforms of Estrogen Receptor Genes from Xenopus Gonad and Brain

We isolated four variants of ER alpha mRNA, two each from the brain and gonad of the Xenopus embryo (brain, bER alpha 1 and bER alpha 2; gonad, gER alpha 1 and gER alpha 2). The N-terminal-domain of ER alpha differed between the brain and gonad. While the C-terminal region downstream of the DNA-binding domain of ER alpha differed between ER alpha 1 and ER alpha 2 in both the brain and gonad, each of ER alpha 1 and ER alpha 2 contained the same sequence sets (bER alpha 1 and gER alpha 1; bER alpha 2 and gER alpha 2) between the brain and gonad. Both bER alpha 1 and gER alpha 1 contained the same full-length, C-terminal estrogen receptor, whereas the C terminus of bER alpha 2 and gER alpha 2 lacked half of the DNA-binding, ligand-binding, and transcriptional activation domain. Although gER alpha was mainly expressed in the gonad, both bER alpha and gER alpha were expressed in the brain of the Xenopus embryo at stage 50. These isoforms might be transcribed by alterative splicing of a single gene. Two gonad ER beta s differing in the length of the N-terminal sequence were isolated from the Xenopus gonad. While ER beta was expressed in the gonad, it was not expressed in the brain of the Xenopus embryo at stage 50.

Regulation of Estrogen Rapid Signaling through Arginine Methylation by PRMT1

Evidence is emerging that estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) is central to the rapid transduction of estrogen signaling to the downstream kinase cascades; however, the mechanisms underlying this nongenomic function are not fully understood. Here we report a paradigm of ERalpha regulation through arginine methylation by PRMT1, which transiently methylates arginine 260 within the ERalpha DNA-binding domain. This methylation event is required for mediating the extranuclear function of the receptor by triggering its interaction with the p85 subunit of PI3K and Src. Furthermore, we find that the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a Src substrate involved in the migration process, is also recruited in this complex. Our data indicate that the methylation of ERalpha is a physiological process occurring in the cytoplasm of normal and malignant epithelial breast cells and that ERalpha is hypermethylated in a subset of breast cancers.

MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α

The MUC1 protein is aberrantly overexpressed by most human breast carcinomas. We report that the MUC1 C-terminal subunit associates with estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and that this interaction is stimulated by 17beta-estradiol (E2). MUC1 binds directly to the ERalpha DNA binding domain and stabilizes ERalpha by blocking its ubiquitination and degradation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays further demonstrate that MUC1 (1) associates with ERalpha complexes on estrogen-responsive promoters, (2) enhances ERalpha promoter occupancy, and (3) increases recruitment of the p160 coactivators SRC-1 and GRIP1. In concert with these results, we show that MUC1 stimulates ERalpha-mediated transcription and contributes to E2-mediated growth and survival of breast cancer cells. These findings provide evidence that MUC1 stabilizes ERalpha and that this oncoprotein is of importance to the activation of ERalpha function.

Rapid estrogen-induced phosphorylation of the SRC-3 coactivator occurs in an extranuclear complex containing estrogen receptor.

SRC-3/AIB1/ACTR/pCIP/RAC3/TRAM1 is a primary transcriptional coregulator for estrogen receptor (ER). Six SRC-3 phosphorylation sites have been identified, and these can be induced by steroids, cytokines, and growth factors, involving multiple kinase signaling pathways. Using phosphospecific antibodies for six phosphorylation sites, we investigated the mechanisms involved in estradiol (E2)-induced SRC-3 phosphorylation and found that this occurs only when either activated estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) or activated ERbeta is present. Both the activation function 1 and the ligand binding domains of ERalpha are required for maximal induction. Mutations in the coactivator binding groove of the ERalpha ligand binding domain inhibit E2-stimulated SRC-3 phosphorylation, as do mutations in the nuclear receptor-interacting domain of SRC-3, suggesting that ERalpha must directly contact SRC-3 for this posttranslational modification to take place. A transcriptionally inactive ERalpha mutant which localizes to the cytoplasm supports E2-induced SRC-3 phosphorylation. Mutations of the ERalpha DNA binding domain did not block this rapid E2-dependent SRC-3 phosphorylation. Together these data demonstrate that E2-induced SRC-3 phosphorylation is dependent on a direct interaction between SRC-3 and ERalpha and can occur outside of the nucleus. Our results provide evidence for an early nongenomic action of ER on SRC-3 that supports the well-established downstream genomic roles of estrogen and coactivators.

Cross-talk between ERs and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 is E2 dependent and involves two functionally separate mechanisms.

Steroid hormone receptors and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) factors constitute two distinct families of transcription factors activated by different signaling pathways. In previous reports, cross-talk between STAT5 and several steroid receptors has been demonstrated. We investigated putative cross-talk between ERalpha and ERbeta and STAT5. ERalpha and ERbeta were found to potently repress PRL-induced STAT5 transcriptional activity on a beta-casein promoter construct in a ligand-dependent manner. This down-regulation was found to rely on direct physical interaction between the ERs and STAT5, mediated via the ER DNA-binding domain (DBD). The contact between the ER DBD and STAT5 is highly specific; the interaction is abolished if the ERalpha DBD is replaced with the DBD of a closely related steroid receptor. The physical interaction, however, is insufficient to confer the repression of STAT5 activity, which in addition requires the ligand-activated C-terminal part of the ERs, although these domains are not in direct contact with STAT5. Negative cross-talk between ERs and STAT5 is thus mediated via several functionally separated domains of the ERs. Our findings may enhance the understanding of mechanisms of regulation of the different hormonal signaling pathways occurring during different functional events in tissues coexpressing ERs and STAT5.

Reporter cell lines are useful tools for monitoring biological activity of nuclear receptor ligands.

To characterize the specificity of synthetic compounds for nuclear receptors, we established stable cell lines expressing the luciferase gene and different wild-type or chimaeric receptors. MCF-7 cells, which express the oestrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha), and HeLa cells, which do not express the oestrogen receptor, were transfected with a plasmid containing the luciferase gene downstream from a minimum promoter (beta-globin) and an oestrogen-responsive element, generating the MELN and the HELN cell lines, respectively. MELN cells enabled the detection of compounds that bind to the ER alpha or interfere with its pathway. HELN cells were used to establish stable transfectants expressing different nuclear receptors containing the DNA-binding domain of the oestrogen receptors. We thus established ER alpha or ER beta reporter cell lines by transfecting ER alpha or ER beta expression plasmids, and also retinoic acid receptor alpha, beta or gamma reporter cell lines by transfecting the chimaeric RAR gene, in which the DNA-binding domain was replaced by the ER alpha DNA-binding domain.

FRA-1 expression level modulates regulation of activator protein-1 activity by estradiol in breast cancer cells.

We compared the effect of estradiol on activator protein-1 (AP-1) activity in estrogen receptor positive (ER alpha+) and estrogen receptor negative (ER alpha-) human breast cancer cell lines transiently transfected with the AP-1-responsive reporter plasmid AP-1-TK-CAT and an ER alpha expression vector. While estradiol increased AP-1 activity in the ER alpha+ cell lines MCF7, ZR75.1, and T47D, it decreased (MDA-MB231 and BT20 cells) or had no significant effect (MDA-MB435 cells) on AP-1-mediated transcription in ER alpha- cells. Estradiol also inhibited AP-1 activity in ER alpha-MDA-MB231 cells stably transfected with ER alpha and in which ER alpha levels are close to those found in MCF7. Use of ER alpha mutant expression vectors demonstrated that the DNA-binding domain of ER alpha was needed for stimulation or inhibition of AP-1 activity by estradiol but suggested that ER alpha binding to estrogen-responsive elements was not required for these effects. Changes in regulation paralleled quantitative and qualitative changes in protein binding to AP-1 sites, as demonstrated by gel shift assay: protein binding was greater and DNA/protein complexes migrated faster for ER alpha--than for ER alpha+ cells. In fact, by Northern blot, a high level of Fra-1 mRNA was found in BT20 and MDA-MB231 cells as compared with ER alpha+ cells, and MDA-MB435 cells showed an intermediary level of expression. The differential expression of Fra-1 in MCF7 and MDA-MB231 cells was confirmed at the protein level by supershift experiments. In addition, overexpression of Fra-1 in MCF7 cells decreased the positive effect of estradiol while inhibition of Fra-1 expression in MDA-MB231 cells, by transient transfection of the Fra-1 antisense expression vector, abolished the negative effect of the hormone. In conclusion, we demonstrated that ER alpha- breast cancer cell lines differ from ER+ cells by a high level of AP-1 DNA-binding activity due, at least in part, to high Fra-1 constitutive expression. High Fra-1 concentration is crucial for the negative regulation of AP-1 activity by estradiol and thus may take part in estradiol-induced inhibition of cell proliferation in ER alpha- breast cancer cells transfected with ER alpha expression construct.

Estrogen Regulation of the Apolipoprotein AI Gene Promoter through Transcription Cofactor Sharing

Estrogen replacement therapy increases plasma concentrations of high density lipoprotein and its major protein constituent, apolipoprotein AI (apoAI). Studies with animal model systems, however, suggest opposite effects. In HepG2 cells stably expressing estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha), 17beta-estradiol (E2) potently inhibited apoAI mRNA steady state levels. ApoAI promoter deletion mapping experiments indicated that ERalpha plus E2 inhibited apoAI activity through the liver-specific enhancer. Although the ERalpha DNA binding domain was essential but not sufficient for apoAI enhancer inhibition, ERalpha binding to the apoAI enhancer could not be detected by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Western blotting and cotransfection assays showed that ERalpha plus E2 did not influence the abundance or the activity of the hepatocyte-enriched factors HNF-3beta and HNF-4, two transcription factors essential for apoAI enhancer function. Expression of the ERalpha coactivator RIP140 dramatically repressed apoAI enhancer function in cotransfection experiments, suggesting that RIP140 may also function as a coactivator on the apoAI enhancer. Moreover, estrogen regulation of apoAI enhancer activity was dependent upon the balance between ERalpha and RIP140 levels. At low ratios of RIP140 to ERalpha, E2 repressed apoAI enhancer activity, whereas at high ratios this repression was reversed. Regulation of the apoAI gene by estrogen may thus vary in direction and magnitude depending not only on the presence of ERalpha and E2 but also upon the intracellular balance of ERalpha and coactivators utilized by ERalpha and the apoAI enhancer.