Equitable Access To Health Care Research Articles

Revolutionizing Care: Unleashing the Potential of Digital Health Technology in Physiotherapy Management for People With Cystic Fibrosis.

This viewpoint paper explores the dynamic intersection of physiotherapy and digital health technologies (DHTs) in enhancing the care of people with cystic fibrosis (CF), in the context of advancements such as highly effective modulator therapies that are enhancing life expectancy and altering physiotherapy needs. The role of DHTs, including telehealth, surveillance, home monitoring, and activity promotion, has expanded, becoming crucial in overcoming geographical barriers and accelerated by the recent pandemic. Physiotherapy, integral to CF care since 1946, has shifted toward patient-centered approaches, emphasizing exercise training and a physically active lifestyle. The reduction in inpatient admissions due to highly effective modulator therapies has led to increased home care and online or electronic consultations, and DHTs have revolutionized service delivery, offering flexibility, self-management, and personalized care options; however, there is a need to comprehensively understand user experiences from both people with CF and physiotherapists. This paper highlights the essential exploration of user experiences to facilitate clinician adaptation to the digital requirements of modern clinical management, ensuring equitable care in the "future hospitals" arena. Identifying research gaps, this paper emphasizes the need for a thorough evaluation of DHT use in CF physiotherapy education, training, and self-monitoring, as well as the experiences of people with CF with online or electronic consultations, self-monitoring, and remote interventions. Online group exercise platforms address historical challenges relating to infection control but necessitate comprehensive evaluations of user experiences and preferences. Future-proofing DHTs within the physiotherapy management of CF demands a shift toward full integration, considering stakeholder opinions and addressing barriers. While DHTs have the potential to extend physiotherapy beyond the hospital, this paper stresses the importance of understanding user experiences, addressing digital poverty, and working toward more equitable health care access. A flexible approach in the "future hospital" is advocated, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of user preferences and experiences to optimize the integration of DHTs in CF care.

Moms in motion: Predicting healthcare utilization patterns among mothers in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Mothers have a significant influence on family dynamics, child development, and access to family services. There is a lack of literature on the typical Canadian maternal experience and its influence on access to services for mothers despite recognizing the importance of mothers. A cross-sectional study was conducted to address this research gap that employed Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Use in conjunction with a feminist lens. A total of 1,082 mothers who resided in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) participated in a province-wide survey in 2017 and reported on their wellbeing, family life, and healthcare utilization. Stepwise binomial logistic regressions and linear regressions were used to predict initiation and continued service utilization within the preceding 12 months, respectively. Mothers who participated in this survey were older, and were more likely to be in a relationship than those in the Canadian census, while no difference was observed in annual income. Approximately half of mothers accessed services for themselves over the previous 12-months, with the overwhelming majority accessing services for their children. Medical services were the most likely to be utilized, and mental health and behavioural services were the most likely services to be needed, but not available. Sociodemographic (e.g., age, education attainment), familial relationships and role satisfaction, health need, and health practices predicted maternal initiation and continued use of services, with a larger number of variables influencing maternal service initiation as compared to continuous use of services. Sociodemographic (e.g., maternal age, community population), maternal social support, health need, and maternal health practices predicted maternal access of at least one child service while family relationships, health need, and maternal health practices predicted maternal use of a range of child services conditional on initial access. These results can support the provincial health system to better support access to care by acknowledging the interdependent nature of maternal and child health care utilization. They also highlight the importance of equitable healthcare access in rural locations. Results are discussed in terms of their clinical relevance to health policy.

POLICY ADVICE ON EQUAL ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE: WHAT'S NEW?

We have less than ten years to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the health sector, it is crucial to focus on Goal 3, which aims for the health and well-being of everyone. Despite progress, disparities in healthcare access continue to affect vulnerable populations. Some countries have implemented Universal Health Coverage (UHC) to ensure equal healthcare access. This editorial emphasized the need for targeted interventions, policy reforms, and increased public awareness to achieve equitable healthcare access and better health outcomes for diverse populations. Keywords: disparities, policy reforms, SDGs, UHC

POLICY ADVICE ON EQUAL ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE: WHAT'S NEW?

We have less than ten years to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the health sector, it is crucial to focus on Goal 3, which aims for the health and well-being of everyone. Despite progress, disparities in healthcare access continue to affect vulnerable populations. Some countries have implemented Universal Health Coverage (UHC) to ensure equal healthcare access. This editorial emphasized the need for targeted interventions, policy reforms, and increased public awareness to achieve equitable healthcare access and better health outcomes for diverse populations. Keywords: disparities, policy reforms, SDGs, UHC

Impact of race and ethnicity on financial toxicity in patients with genitourinary cancers.

11077 Background: Genitourinary (GU) cancers contribute substantially to the cost of healthcare in the United States (US). While advancements in cancer treatment have improved patient outcomes, disparities in healthcare costs persist, exacerbating the financial burden on vulnerable populations. We sought to investigate the disparities in costs of inpatient hospitalizations among patients with GU cancers in the US. Methods: Eligible adult GU cases from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2019–2021) were included in this study. ICD-10 CM codes were utilized to identify renal cell, prostate, urothelial, testicular, and penile cancers. In addition to the total hospital inpatient (IP) facility expenditure, questions about ability to pay for healthcare were included in the analysis after accounting for the complex survey design and sampling weights. Results: The study included a weighted sample size of 9,061,181 (wt SE = 538,502) GU cases in the US between 2019 and 2021. The mean (95% CI) age of the sample was 71.6 (70.7, 72.5) years. The sample consisted of 7.9% Hispanics, 74.8% non-Hispanic White (NHW), 13.8% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 3.5% Asian or other races (NHA). In 2021, NHB participants reported the lowest annual family income of $51742 (18932, 106185), followed by Hispanics with $65233 (24314, 95859), and NHW with 82035 (36298, 158863). A greater proportion of the elderly NHW population was insured compared to NHB and Hispanics (44.9% vs. 32.5% vs. 19.5%), respectively. Of note, NHB patients had worse self-perceived physical and mental health compared to NHW and Hispanics, with 18.1% reporting fair or poor physical and mental health (vs. 8.1% and 14.3%, respectively). NHB participants reported higher rates of familial financial hardship (2019: 10.2% vs. 3.6%; 2020: 6.2% vs. 3.5%; 2021: 7.1% vs. 3.3%) or not being able to afford medical care (2019: 7.2% vs. 2.1%; 2020: 2.5% vs. 0.6%; 2021: 1.9% vs. 1.7%) when compared to NHW. Overall, mean total hospital IP facility expenses were: Hispanics = $2873.30 (1434.49, 4312.12); NHW = $4213.81 (3241.05, 5186.56); and NHB = $5199.99 (2842.93, 7557.05). After accounting for sample weights, gender, family income, age, insurance status, and survey year, Poisson regression analysis showed significant differences between different racial groups. Hispanics were less likely (𝛽=-0.48; p<0.0001), while NHB (𝛽=0.152; p<0.0001) and NHA (𝛽=0.48; p<0.0001) were more likely to spend for an IP hospitalization when compared to NHW (ref.). Conclusions: Our data revealed racial disparities in the costs of inpatient hospitalizations, highlighting potential financial toxicity among patients with GU cancers. Additional investigation is warranted to elucidate factors contributing to these inequities, aiming to optimize cancer management and alleviate financial burdens. Addressing these disparities is crucial to prioritize equitable healthcare access and promote systemic change.

Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Selected Surgeries in the Cardiology Department for Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), Private Health Insurance, and Uninsured Patients in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Karnataka, India.

Cardiovascular diseases are a major public health issue and the leading cause of mortality globally. The global economic burden of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) for cardiovascular surgeries and procedures is substantial, with average costs being significantly higher than other treatments. This imposes a heavy economic burden. Government insurance schemes like Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) aim to enhance affordability and access to cardiac care. This retrospective study analyzed OOPE incurred for top cardiac surgeries under AB-PMJAY, private insurance, and uninsured patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karnataka. Data of 1021 patients undergoing common cardiac procedures from January to July 2023 were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, median) and the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. The study aims to evaluate financial risk protection offered by AB-PMJAY compared to private plans and inform effective policy-making in reducing the OOPE burden for surgeries in India. The study analyzed OOPE across 1021 patients undergoing any of four surgeries at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Karnataka. AB-PMJAY patients incurred zero OOPE across all surgeries. Uninsured patients faced the highest median OOPE, ranging from ₹1,15,292 (1390.57 USD) to ₹1,72,490 (2080.45 USD) depending on surgery type. Despite the presence of private insurance, the median out-of-pocket expenditure ranged from ₹1,689 (20.38 USD) to ₹68,788 (829.67 USD). Significant variations in OOPE were observed within different payment groups. Private insurance in comparison with AB-PMJAY had limitations like co-payments, deductibles, and limited coverage resulting in higher OOPE for patients. The results illustrate the efficacy of AB-PMJAY in reducing the financial burden and improving the affordability of cardiac procedures compared to private insurance. This emphasizes the significance of programmmes funded by the government in reducing the OOPE burden and ensuring equitable healthcare access. The comprehensive and particular estimates of OOPE for different surgical procedures, categorized by payment methods provide valuable information to guide the development of policies that aim to reduce OOPE and progress towarduniversal health coverage in India.

Improving access to primary health care through financial innovation in rural China: a quasi-experimental synthetic difference-in-differences approach

BackgroundInadequate financing constrains primary healthcare (PHC) capacity in many low- and middle-income countries, particularly in rural areas. This study evaluates an innovative PHC financing reform in rural China that aimed to improve access to healthcare services through supply-side integration and the establishment of a designated PHC fund.MethodsWe employed a quasi-experimental synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) approach to analyze county-level panel data from Chongqing Province, China, spanning from 2009 to 2018. The study compared the impact of the reform on PHC access and per capita health expenditures in Pengshui County with 37 other control counties (districts). We assessed the reform’s impact on two key outcomes: the share of outpatient visits at PHC facilities and per capita total PHC expenditure.ResultsThe reform led to a significant increase in the share of outpatient visits at PHC facilities (14.92% points; 95% CI: 6.59–23.24) and an increase in per capita total PHC expenditure (87.30 CNY; 95% CI: 3.71-170.88) in Pengshui County compared to the synthetic control. These effects were robust across alternative model specifications and increased in magnitude over time, highlighting the effectiveness of the integrated financing model in enhancing PHC capacity and access in rural China.ConclusionsThis research presents compelling evidence demonstrating that horizontal integration in PHC financing significantly improved utilization and resource allocation in rural primary care settings in China. This reform serves as a pivotal model for resource-limited environments, demonstrating how supply-side financing integration can bolster PHC and facilitate progress toward universal health coverage. The findings underscore the importance of sustainable financing mechanisms and the need for policy commitment to achieve equitable healthcare access.

Can financial incentives improve access to care? Evidence from a French experiment on specialist physicians

In France, addressing balance billing is essential for equitable healthcare access and reducing physician income disparities. The National Health Insurance (NHI) introduced financial incentive programs, namely the “Contract for Access to Care” (CAS) in 2014 and the “Option for Controlled Pricing” (OPTAM) in 2017, to encourage physicians to reduce extra fees and adhere to regulated prices. This study analyzed the impact of these programs on self-employed physicians using a comprehensive administrative dataset covering specialist physicians from 2005 to 2017. The dataset comprised 9891 surgical specialists (30,972 observations) and 6926 medical specialists (21,650 observations) between 2005 and 2017.Applying a difference-in-differences design with a two-way fixed effect model and matching through the "Coarsened Exact Matching" method, the study examined CAS and/or OPTAM membership effects on physicians' activity and fees. The results indicate that both the CAS and OPTAM successfully enhance access to care. Physicians treat more patients, particularly those with lower incomes who might have previously avoided care because of the extra fees. However, an increased patient load translates to a higher workload for physicians. Despite a fee increase, it was observed to be smaller than the surge in activity.Furthermore, if all physicians are appropriately rewarded for their efforts, this improvement in access comes at a cost to NHI. This study's findings provide crucial insights into the nuanced effects of these financial incentive programs on physicians' behavior, highlighting the tradeoff between improved access and increased NHI costs. Ultimately, these findings underscore the complexity of balancing financial incentives, physician workload, and healthcare accessibility in pursuit of a more equitable healthcare system.

Telemedicine and Disparities in Mental Health Service Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias

ObjectiveTo examine disparities in mental health (MH) service utilization, via in-person and telemedicine (ie, tele-MH), by individuals' race, ethnicity, and community socioeconomic status, among community-dwelling older adults with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) before and after the expansion of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) telemedicine policy. DesignObservational study. Setting and ParticipantsA total of 3,003,571 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD between 2019 and 2021 were included in the study. MethodsMultiple national data were linked. The unit of analysis was individual-quarter. Three outcomes were defined: any MH visits (in-person or tele-MH), in-person MH visits, and tele-MH visits per quarter. Key independent variables included individual race and ethnicity, the socioeconomic status of the community, and an indicator for the implementation of the telemedicine policy. Regression analyses with individual random effects were used. ResultsIn general, Black and Hispanic older adults with ADRD and those in socioeconomically deprived communities were less likely to have MH visits than white adults and those from less-deprived communities. In-person and tele-MH visits varied throughout the pandemic and across subpopulations. For instance, at the beginning of the pandemic, white, Black, and Hispanic older adults experienced 5.05, 3.03, and 2.87 percentage point reductions in in-person MH visits, and 3.53, 1.26, and 0.32 percentage point increases in tele-MH visits (with P < .01 for racial/ethnic differences), respectively. During the pandemic, the increasing trend in in-person MH visits and the decreasing trend in tele-MH visits varied across different subgroups. Overall, racial and ethnic differences in any MH visits were reduced, but the gap in any MH visits between deprived and less-deprived communities doubled during the pandemic (P < .01). Conclusions and ImplicationsTelemedicine may have provided an opportunity to improve access to MH services among underserved populations. However, although some disparities in MH care were reduced, others widened, underscoring the importance of equitable health care access strategies to address the unique needs of different populations.

Barriers to access and utilization of health services among marginalized communities in sub-Saharan African countries: Scoping review

Purpose: This scoping review aimed to investigate the barriers encountered by marginalized communities in sub-Saharan African countries when accessing and utilizing healthcare services. Methodology: The scoping review was evaluated through online databases like the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline and SCOPUS review according to the barriers to accessing and utilizing health services among marginalized communities in sub-Saharan African countries. The scoping review identifies the articles from the topic through the online databases using the including and excluding criteria. Findings: The findings identified the barriers to healthcare access, lack of communication and language, and not sharing the proper health details with the healthcare professional. The findings also demonstrated the implications and consequences such as health disparities, economic burden, social and human rights implications, loss of productivity and development, public health implications, and reinforcing social exclusion. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This scoping review illuminates the intricate nexus of socio-economic factors, cultural dynamics, and human rights awareness as barriers to healthcare access in sub-Saharan Africa. The findings offer actionable insights for healthcare practitioners to customize services for marginalized communities, addressing communication gaps and information-sharing reluctance. Moreover, policymakers can utilize these insights to advocate evidence-based policies aimed at promoting equitable healthcare access and enhancing health literacy. Thus, this research serves as a vital conduit between theoretical understanding, practical application, and policy formulation, facilitating the advancement of inclusive and equitable healthcare delivery in the region.

Strategic threat health response in Australia capital cities: Predicting the optimum locations for field hospitals through geospatial analysis

AbstractObjectiveThe advent of the COVID‐19 pandemic has accentuated the critical importance of epidemic preparedness within national healthcare systems. This study presents a geospatial analysis aimed at optimising the placement of field hospitals in Australia to ensure adequate healthcare access during pandemics.MethodsThe latest census data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics were integrated with the spatial locations of current emergency departments within Australian capitals. Buffer zones with a 7.5 km radius were created around the public emergency departments (EDs). Buffer zones outside the 7.5 km radius that exhibited high population densities were categorised into high‐density (red), moderate‐density (yellow) and low‐density (green) zones to prioritise and tailor healthcare responses during a pandemic. The identification of high‐density population areas outside the ED radius enabled the stratification of potential sites for ED facilities.ResultsNinety‐one potential field hospital sites were identified across Australia's capital cities. The findings indicate that the addition of these sites would place over 95% of the population within a 7.5 km radius of an ED facility. This network of proposed sites is designed to serve a spectrum of population densities, ensuring equitable healthcare access for both densely populated urban centres and less populated areas.ConclusionsThis study underscores the potential of field hospitals to strengthen Australia's public health system against emergencies. By advocating for the creation of 91 field hospitals within a 7.5 km reach for over 95% of urban dwellers across major cities, it demonstrates a strategic approach to ensure comprehensive ED coverage. Drawing on international examples, including China's Fangcang hospitals, the USA's post‐acute care (PAC) facilities and the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) Nightingale Hospitals, it highlights the need for healthcare agility and scalability, especially during pandemic outbreaks. The research presents a blueprint for field hospital deployment, marking a significant advancement in public health logistics and protection across Australia's varied demographic and geographical landscapes.

Listening to Black Women's Perspectives of Birth Centers and Midwifery Care: Advocacy, Protection, and Empowerment.

Black women in Texas experience high rates of adverse maternal outcomes that have been linked to health inequities and structural racism in the maternal care system. Birth centers and midwifery care are highlighted in the literature as contributing to improved perinatal care experiences and decreased adverse outcomes for Black women. However, compared with White women, Black women underuse birth centers and midwifery care. Black women's perceptions in Texas of birth center and midwifery care are underrepresented in research. Thus, this study aimed to highlight the views of Black women residing in Texas on birth centers and midwifery care to identify their needs and explore ways to increasing access to perinatal care. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 pregnant and postpartum Black women residing in Texas. Questions focused on the women's access, knowledge, and use of birth centers and midwifery care in the context of their lived maternal care experiences. Interview transcripts were reviewed and analyzed using inductive, qualitative content analysis. The Black women interviewed all shared experiences of discrimination and bias while receiving obstetric care that affected their interest in and overall perceptions of birth center and midwifery care. Participants also discussed financial and institutional barriers that impacted their ease of access to birth center and midwifery care services. Additionally, participants highlighted the need for culturally sensitive and respectful perinatalhealth care. The Black women interviewed in this study emphasized the prevalence of racism and discrimination in perinatal health care encounters, a reflection consistent with current literature. Black women also expressed a desire to use birth centers and midwifery care but identified the barriers in Texas that impede access. Study findings highlight the need to address barriers to promote equitable perinatal health care access for Black women.

Experiences and impacts of out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure on remote Aboriginal families.

Aboriginal Australians face significant health disparities, with hospitalisation rates 2.3 times greater, and longer hospital length of stay, than non-Indigenous Australians. This additional burden impacts families further through out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure (OOPHE), which includes additional healthcare expenses not covered by universal taxpayer insurance. Aboriginal patients traveling from remote locations are likely to be impacted further by OOPHE. The objective of this study was to examine the impacts and burden of OOPHE for rurally based Aboriginal individuals. Participants were recruited through South Australian community networks to participate in this study. Decolonising methods of yarning and deep listening were used to centralise local narratives and language of OOPHE. Qualitative analysis software was used to thematically code transcripts and organise data. A total of seven yarning sessions were conducted with 10 participants. Seven themes were identified: travel, barriers to health care, personal and social loss, restricted autonomy, financial strain, support initiatives and protective factors. Sleeping rough, selling assets and not attending appointments were used to mitigate or avoid OOPHE. Government initiatives, such as the patient assistance transport scheme, did little to decrease OOPHE burden on participants. Family connections, Indigenous knowledges and engagement with cultural practices were protective against OOPHE burden. Aboriginal families are significantly burdened by OOPHE when needing to travel for health care. Radical change of government initiative and policies through to health professional awareness is needed to ensure equitable healthcare access that does not create additional financial hardship in communities already experiencing economic disadvantage.

Working as a Healthcare Professional at Island Primary Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Study on the Cyclades Islands, Greece.

Improving the quality of and access to healthcare services in rural areas is fundamental to developing sustainable healthcare systems. This research aims to explore the motivations of healthcare professionals to work and settle in rural island areas of Greece with limited access to secondary and tertiary care. The study suggests practical ways to encourage self-motivation and attract more health workers in rural areas. An exploratory qualitative research approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews with 16 healthcare professionals working in primary-care units that lack direct hospital or hospital-health centre access. The research was conducted specifically in the rural islands of the Cyclades. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify common themes and unique insights from the participants. The analysis revealed three thematic categories. Τhe «attraction» thematic was influenced by personal factors, random selection, origin, accommodation factors, professional factors, and obligatoriness. The «recruitment» thematic was associated with understaffing, special care issues, an unstable working environment, educational and organisational aspects, and an insular lifestyle. The thematic of «retention» highlighted personal issues, accommodation difficulties, economic and work-related issues, and unique challenges posed by an insular lifestyle. This research provides valuable insights into the motivations that drive healthcare professionals to settle, work, and remain in remote island units, as well as the challenges they encounter in making this decision. The study proposes strategies to motivate and attract more healthcare professionals to rural areas. These findings should be considered when formulating or reviewing primary healthcare empowerment policies to ensure equitable healthcare access for all individuals.

From Alzheimer's Disease to Anxiety, Epilepsy to Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Dive Into Neuro-Psychiatric Disorders.

This comprehensive narrative review endeavors to dissect the intricate web of neuropsychiatric disorders that significantly impact cognition, emotion regulation, behavior, and mental health. With a keen focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD), anxiety disorders, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), this article delves into their underlying mechanisms, clinical presentations, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic interventions. Highlighting the considerable disability and societal costs that these conditions impose, it reflects on the over six million individuals grappling with Alzheimer's, the 19 million American adults living with anxiety disorders, the three million with epilepsy, and the global reach of schizophrenia affecting approximately 20 million people. Furthermore, it examines the emerging landscape of ASD, noting the escalating diagnosis rates and the pressing need for innovative treatments and equitable healthcare access. Through a detailed exploration of current research, technological innovations, and the promise of personalized medicine, this review aims to illuminate the complexities of these conditions, advocate for early intervention strategies, and call for a unified approach to tackling the multifaceted challenges they present. The ultimate goal is to inform and inspire healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers to foster advancements that improve outcomes and quality of life for individuals affected by these profound neuropsychiatric disorders, steering towards a future where these conditions are no longer insurmountable.

Unveiling Health Inequalities: Exploring Metabolic Dysfunction in Rural Roma Communities.

Europe's largest ethnic minority, the Roma, are often confronted with substantial obstacles that result in health disparities. Research indicates that there are elevated rates of both communicable and non-communicable diseases, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS), among Roma communities, often linked to living conditions, limited education, or poverty. This study centers on remote rural Roma settlements in Romania, evaluating the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction, obesity, and liver steatosis while considering socio-economic and lifestyle factors. Over a period of 36 months, local visits to a total of 25 rural Roma communities were conducted, where a medical team gathered information through a standardized questionnaire and conducted a physical exam on every participant. Liver steatosis was also recorded with the help of a portable wireless ultrasound device. Our study included 343 participants, with a predominance of female subjects, representing 72.5% (n = 249) of the patients. The prevalence of obesity, defined by a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2, was 32.2% (n = 111). Arterial hypertension was found to have a prevalence of 54.1% (n = 185), with de novo hypertension being observed in 19.2% patients (n = 66). Type 2 diabetes mellitus was found in 28.9% patients (n = 99), with 19.5% being de novo cases. The prevalence of hepatic steatosis was 57.2% (n = 111/194). A positive association between metabolic features and at-risk behaviors was found. This study underscores the transition from infectious to metabolic diseases in vulnerable communities and highlights the urgency of targeted public health strategies tailored to the unique needs of rural Roma populations, aiming to mitigate health disparities and promote equitable healthcare access.

Social and demographic determinants of health insurance status in India: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

Out-of-pocket medical expenses are a crucial metric for assessing how well the healthcare system is working toward obtaining universal health coverage in any country. In India, out-of-pocket expenses for health are relatively high compared to other developed countries due to a lack of alternative finance arrangements. The disparity in out-of-pocket medical expenses largely depends upon the public health expenditure, government policies, and level of health insurance coverage. The study used a logit regression model to examine the association of the status of health insurance with socio and demographic variables using National Sample Survey 2018 data. The objective of the study is to analyze the impact of demographic variables on the status of health insurance in India. This research found that education and occupation have a significant impact on the status of health insurance, among other demographic factors. These findings underscore the importance of targeted policies and interventions aimed at improving access to health insurance among specific demographic groups. Addressing disparities in health insurance coverage based on educational and occupational factors is essential for achieving equitable healthcare access and improved health outcomes in the country. Increasing awareness of health insurance reduces out-of-pocket medical expenses and subsequently brings down economic poverty.

Abstract 1313: Racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence across US ethnic groups: A comprehensive analysis

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent global cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Racial disparities in CRC within the United States pose a significant public health concern, affecting incidence, mortality rates, and screening rates. This study investigates the impact of racial disparities on CRC incidence across various US states, utilizing CRC data from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Analysis with GraphPad Prism 5 software and Student's t-test reveals a consistent trend of higher CRC incidence in males compared to females, irrespective of ethnicity. Notably, the Black and American Indian ethnic groups demonstrate the highest CRC incidences among all races, especially in individuals aged 65 and above. Certain states, including Iowa and Mississippi for Black populations, and Alaska, Minnesota, Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota for American Indian populations, exhibit significantly elevated CRC incidences compared to the national average. County-specific analysis in Alabama reveals varying CRC incidence rates across ethnic groups, with higher rates in specific counties, such as Clarke County for Black males. Limited reports for American Indian, Asian Pacific, and Hispanic ethnic groups indicate potential disparities in access to testing, awareness, and funding for CRC detection and prevention. This study concludes that Black and American Indian males and females experience a higher incidence of colorectal cancer, possibly influenced by genetic factors or other variables contributing to CRC development. The observed disparities are multifaceted, arising from a combination of social, economic, and healthcare system factors. Addressing these complexities is crucial for mitigating CRC disparities and promoting equitable healthcare access and outcomes. Additional research, including molecular screening studies, is essential to substantiate disparities in cancer-related health and enhance public health and cancer awareness within the community. Key Words: Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Health Care, Racial Disparities Citation Format: Anathbandhu Chaudhuri, Rosianna Gray. Racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence across US ethnic groups: A comprehensive analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1313.

Physician Workforce Diversity Is Still Necessary and Achievable if It Is Intentionally Prioritized.

The 2023 Supreme Court Decision from Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina threatens the current progress in achieving diversity within undergraduate and graduate medical education. This is necessary to achieve a diverse healthcare workforce, which is a key to healing historical healthcare trauma, eliminating health disparities, and providing equitable healthcare access for all communities. Although the Supreme Court decision seems obstructionist, viable opportunities exist to enhance recruitment further and solidify diversity efforts in undergraduate and graduate medical education to achieve these goals.

Analysis of the Availability of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy in Ukraine: A Survey of Doctors

In Ukraine, about 100,000 children suffer from nervous system disorders, with cerebral palsy (CP) being the leading cause of childhood disability. The European Registry of Children with Cerebral Palsy emphasizes the urgency of this problem. The objective: to analyze the supply, availability, and use of Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy in children in Ukraine. Materials and methods. The study was conducted from October 2019 to December 2020, and it included monitoring the supply and availability of medicines, collecting quantitative and qualitative data from various sources, and interviewing 64 doctors. Results. This research highlights disparities in medicine supply satisfaction across Ukraine, with surveys of doctors indicating varying degrees of effectiveness in regions like Kyiv and Kharkiv compared to challenges in Zhytomyr and the Kyiv region. Key issues include surplus medicines, unethical distribution practices, and systemic inefficiencies such as lack of patient registries and insufficient funding. The findings suggest an urgent need for regulatory reforms, enhanced healthcare logistics, and infrastructure improvements to achieve equitable healthcare access nationwide. Conclusions. This study highlights significant challenges in delivering Botulinum toxin type A for spastic cerebral palsy in Ukraine, including systemic inefficiencies, funding shortages, and procurement delays. It emphasizes the need for policy reforms, improved communication, and digital information access to ensure equitable and efficient healthcare. Urgent improvements are advocated to address these issues and enhance patient care nationwide.