Episodes In Neutropenic Patients Research Articles

Guideline on the investigation and management of acute transfusion reactions.

Guideline on the investigation and management of acute transfusion reactions.

One Hundred Consecutive Neutropenic Febrile Episodes Demonstrate That CXCR3 Ligands Have Predictive Value in Discriminating the Severity of Infection in Children with Cancer.

This study assesses the value of the CXCR3 ligands CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10 and CXCL11/I-TAC when used to supplement the standard infection markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in the diagnostic algorithm of neutropenic fever in children with cancer. The concentration of CRP, PCT and chemokines was determined during the first hour of fever and 12-24 h afterwards in pediatric oncology patients with neutropenia. Among 100 consecutive febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, 34 cases demonstrated fever of unknown origin (FUO) (group A), 47 demonstrated mild clinically or microbiologically proven infection (Group B) and 19 severe infection (Group C). Significantly higher PCT-1 levels were found in group C (0.24 ng/mL) vs. group A (0.16 ng/mL), and PCT-2 in group C (1.2 ng/mL) vs. A (0.17 ng/mL), and in C vs. B (0.2 ng/mL). Chemokine concentrations (I-TAC-1, IP-10-1, IP-10-2) were significantly lower in Group A vs. B+C; I-TAC 1: 48.64 vs. 70.99 pg/mL, p = 0.03; IP-10 1: 59.95 vs. 96.84 pg/mL, p = 0.04; and IP-10 2: 102.40 vs. 149.39 pg/mL, p = 0.05. The selected pro-inflammatory chemokines I-TAC and IP10 might help to distinguish cancer patients with febrile neutropenia with the highest risk of infection. Although procalcitonin could serve as a marker of a high risk of infection, its delayed response diminishes its usefulness.

Empiric antibiotic protocols for cancer patients with neutropenia: a single–center study of treatment efficacy and mortality in patients with bacteremia

BackgroundThere are several empiric antibiotic treatment options for febrile neutropenia, yet there is no universally-accepted initial protocol. We aimed to assess the performance of a protocol (piperacillin, gentamicin and cefazolin) introduced over 40 years ago and compare its coverage against bacteria isolated from blood of neutropenic patients with that of various commonly used antibiotic treatment protocols. MethodsAdults with neutropenia admitted between 2003 and 2012 to the hemato-oncologic departments and in whom blood cultures were taken on admission were included. Appropriateness of several common antibiotic protocols was assessed based on the susceptibility of the blood isolates. Crude mortality rates were computed by the susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients' blood to the actual treatment given. ResultsIn total, 180 admissions of neutropenic patients (95 in patients who had fever above 38 °C) with positive blood cultures were analyzed. The actual antibiotic regimen prescribed was deemed appropriate in 82% of bacteremia episodes. The recommended institutional protocol was used in 62% of bacteremia episodes in neutropenic patients. This protocol would have been appropriate in 85% of all neutropenic bacteremia episodes and 89% of episodes in febrile neutropenia patients compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (79%, P = 0.13 and 76%, P = 0.002, respectively) and imipenem (93%, P = 0.004 and 92%, P = 0.74, respectively). Isolation of bacteria resistant to the actual antibiotic treatment given was associated with higher mortality at one week and at 30 days. ConclusionCommon current antibiotic regimens provide similar coverage among febrile neutropenic patients, whereas broad spectrum antibiotic combinations maximize coverage among neutropenic patients.

Utility of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Risk Index Score as a Criterion for Nonadmission in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Solid Tumors.

Febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with solid tumors were identified electronically from 10/1/2008 to 11/15/2010. Inclusion criteria were met in 198 episodes. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the MASCC risk index score vs complications were, respectively, 94%, 29.6%, 57.7%, and 82.9%. An MASCC risk index score of 21 or greater could not be used as a criterion for "no complication/ do not admit." Inability to eat should be an admission criterion.

Pneumococcal Bacteremia in Patients With Cancer

Background One of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer is infection. Gram-positive bacteremias now represent 40% to 50% of all bacteremic episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, pneumococcal bacteremia is uncommon in patients with cancer including those who are neutropenic. Resistance to commonly used antibiotics is expected in our population because of heavy exposure to prophylactic and empiric use of fluoroquinolones and β-lactams. Materials and Methods We reviewed the records of patients with documented Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia at the Moffitt Cancer Center between June 2003 and January 2013. The study population was identified by positive blood cultures obtained from the microbiology laboratory during the same period of time. Results During the study period, 27 episodes of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia occurred and were analyzed. Of the 27 patients, 13 (48%) were males with a mean age of 55 years (range, 22–78 years). Most of the patients (78%) received empirical antibiotic treatment as soon as bacteremia was clinically suspected on the basis of fever. Ten (37%) cases were resistant to ceftriaxone, 11 (41%) were resistant to penicillin, and 13 (48%) were resistant to levofloxacin. Seven (26%) patients were neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count, <1500/uL) at the onset of the bacteremia. Thirteen (50%) had hematologic malignancies and 13 (50%) had a solid tumor. Four (15%) patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3 (11%) had asthma, and 1 (4%) had pulmonary fibrosis. One patient did not receive any empirical treatment, deteriorated, and died within 24 hours after onset of the initial symptoms. Overall, 3 (11%) patients died during their hospital stay. Conclusions Pneumococcal bacteremia is found in patients with humoral immune defects such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and those with underlying lung disease. Although pneumococcal bacteremia remains rare in patients with cancer including those with neutropenia, resistance to commonly used antibiotics is higher than expected. Our study illustrates the difficulty of choosing empiric antibiotics for patients with suspected pneumococcal bacteremia with such a high level of resistance.

Bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: which is more fatal - cancer or resistant pathogens?

BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to report the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and clinically or microbiologically proven bacterial or fungal BSIs during neutropenic episodes in patients with hematological malignancies.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, all patients in the hematology department older than 14 years who developed febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy for hematological cancers were evaluated. Patients were included if they had experienced at least one neutropenic episode between November 2010 and November 2012 due to chemotherapy in the hematology ward.ResultsDuring 282 febrile episodes in 126 patients, 66 (23%) episodes of bacteremia and 24 (8%) episodes of fungemia were recorded in 48 (38%) and 18 (14%) patients, respectively. Gram-negative bacteria caused 74% (n=49) of all bacteremic episodes. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (n=6) caused 12% and 9% of Gram-negative bacteremia episodes and all bacteremia episodes, respectively. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria included Acinetobacter baumannii (n=4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1), and Serratia marcescens (n=1). Culture-proven invasive fungal infection occurred in 24 episodes in 18 cases during the study period, with 15 episodes in ten cases occurring in the first study year and nine episodes in eight cases in the second study year. In 13 of 18 cases (72%) with bloodstream yeast infections, previous azole exposure was recorded. Candida parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and C. albicans isolates were resistant to voriconazole and fluconazole.ConclusionBSIs that occur during febrile neutropenic episodes in hematology patients due to Gram-negative bacteria should be treated initially with non-carbapenem-based antipseudomonal therapy taking into consideration antimicrobial stewardship. Non-azole antifungal drugs, including caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B, should be preferred as empirical antifungal therapy in the events of possible or probable invasive fungal infections with an absence of pulmonary findings due to increase azole resistance.

Micafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: A retrospective study.

Invasive fungal infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in neutropenia secondary to hematological malignancies. Empirical antifungal agents are used to reduce their consequences. Caspofungin is the only echinocandin approved for this indication. Micafungin was compared with caspofungin for the treatment of patients with hematological malignancies and prolonged neutropenia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who had hematological malignancies with profound neutropenia for a minimum of 10 days, and received empirical micafungin or caspofungin for a minimum of five days, between April 2005 and November 2009. Successful outcome was based on a composite end point: survival for a minimum of seven days following antifungal cessation, successful treatment of baseline fungal infection, absence of adverse events and absence of breakthrough fungal infection. Fungal infections were defined according to revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC-MSG) criteria, with modification of the diagnostic imaging criteria. Micafungin had similar overall success to caspofungin (60.4% [29 of 48] versus 57.3% [47 of 82], respectively; P=0.729). Survival was higher in the micafungin group compared with the caspofungin group (100% [48 of 48] versus 89% [73 of 82]; P=0.02). No baseline invasive fungal infections were identified in the micafungin group, compared with three proven infections treated successfully with caspofungin (3.7%; P=0.18). Three proven breakthrough infections were observed in the micafungin group (three of 48 [27.3%]) compared with none in the caspofungin group (zero of 82; P=0.02). Micafungin has similar efficacy to caspofungin as empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Verification of these results in a prospective trial is warranted.

Antibiotic Rotation for Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Heterogeneity

BackgroundOur unit adopted the single administration of cefepime as the initial treatment for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. However, recently, cefepime-resistant gram-negative bacteremia, including those with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producers, was frequently observed in these patients. Therefore, we instituted a rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients in an attempt to control antibiotic resistance.MethodsThis prospective trial was performed from August 2008 through March 2011 at our unit. After a pre-intervention period, in which cefepime was used as the initial agent for febrile neutropenia, 4 primary antibiotics, namely, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and cefepime, were rotated at 1-month intervals over 20 months. Blood and surveillance cultures were conducted for febrile episodes, in order to assess the etiology, the resistance pattern (particularly to cefepime), and the prognosis.ResultsIn this trial, 219 patients were registered. A 65.9% reduction in the use of cefepime occurred after the antibiotic rotation. In the surveillance stool cultures, the detection rate of cefepime-resistant gram-negative isolates, of which ESBL-producers were predominant, declined significantly after the intervention (8.5 vs 0.9 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Interestingly, ESBL-related bacteremia was not detected after the initiation of the trial (1.7 vs 0.0 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Infection-related mortality was comparable between the 2 periods.ConclusionsWe implemented a monthly rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients. An antibiotic heterogeneity strategy, mainly performed as a cycling regimen, would be useful for controlling antimicrobial resistance among patients treated for febrile neutropenia.

Clinical Experience of Decitabine in Elderly Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Abstract 2792 Poster Board II-768 Background: Decitabine, a potent DNA hypomethylating agent, has demonstrated efficacy in MDS patients. The incidence of MDS increases with age, with limited treatment options for these patients. With advancing age, patients are generally less tolerant of treatment and suffer from more comorbidities. Important goals of therapy are to improve transfusion dependence and to delay progression of disease, with favorable toxicity. This subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of decitabine on overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, time to response, transfusion independence, and tolerability in subgroups of older patients (65-75 and &gt;75 years of age). Methods: Data used in these analyses were from two previously published clinical trials (Steensma et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009 [DACO-020] and Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2006 [DACO-007]). In both trials, eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had MDS (de novo or secondary) of any French-American-British subtype and an International Prognostic Scoring System score ≥0.5. In DACO-020, patients were treated with decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response rate was assessed with the International Working Group (IWG 2006) criteria in DACO-020. In DACO-007, patients were treated with decitabine 15 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours every 8 hours for 3 consecutive days every 6 weeks. Response rate was assessed with the IWG 2000 criteria in DACO-007. Results: In DACO-020, baseline disease characteristics were generally similar between groups, except more patients in the 65-75 age group (n = 58) had RARS (19% vs. 4%) or RAEB (50% vs. 38%) and fewer had RA (12% vs. 38%) compared to patients in the &gt;75 age group (n = 26). Further, more patients in the &gt;75 group were transfusion dependent at baseline (77% vs. 57%). Grade 3-4 anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were less frequent (22, 5, 35, and 22%, respectively) in patients in the 65-75 age group versus patients in the &gt;75 age group (27, 8, 46, and 35%, respectively). Remarkably, however, there were no reports of febrile neutropenia in &gt;75 age group (26% in the 65-75 age group). Conclusions: In this subgroup analysis, decitabine is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment strategy, even in elderly patients with MDS. Despite the advanced age, responses were more rapid and more durable in the mature elderly than younger patients. The slightly higher hematological toxicity did not translate into increased infectious risk, with no febrile neutropenic episodes in patients over age 75 in these studies. These data suggest that the goals of therapy do not need to be stratified by age, and support future trials of decitabine in elderly and other at-risk populations with MDS. Disclosures: Geils: Eisai Inc. : Speakers Bureau.

INFECTIONS IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA: An Analysis of 222 Febrile Neutropenic Episodes

A retrospective analysis was performed on febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from 1992 to 2002. There were 222 febrile neutropenic episodes in 266 ALL patients with documented ANC < 500/mm3. Of the 222 episodes, 98 (44%) had documented focus of infection; the rest were fever without focus. There were 274 different sites of infection in the 98 episodes of documented focus of infection; pulmonary infections were the commonest site of infection (27.3%) followed by HEENT (22.9%). Of 69 bacterial isolates, gram-negative bacteria (n = 46, 67%) were twice as common as gram-positive bacteria (n = 23, 33%). Most common site of isolation for gram-negative bacteria was blood (50%) followed by urine (32.6%). Blood (78.3%) was predominant site of isolation of gram-positive bacteria followed by HEENT (8.7%). Escherichia coli (45.7%) was the commonest gram-negative isolate, while Staphylococcus aureus (39%) was the commonest gram-positive bacterial isolate. There were a total of 22 fungal isolates, the majority from urine (n = 12) and HEENT (n = 9). Of the 22 fungal isolates, 19 were detected in induction phase of chemotherapy. A total of 95/222 (42.8%) febrile neutropenic episodes improved with first-line antibiotic therapy, while modification was required in 127 episodes (57.2%). Antifungal therapy was used in 86 episodes (38.7%). There were a total of 13 deaths, 6 each during induction and intensification/consolidation phases, while 1 died during maintenance phase. Of the 13 deaths, 10 had pneumonia, 8 had bacteremia, and 7 had fungal infection. The current study stresses the importance of frequent reviewing of type, frequency, severity, and outcome of infection complications over the years to detect changing epidemiological patterns. The majority of fungal infections were detected during induction chemotherapy, which highlights the need to consider this type of infection in the evaluation of patients.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Cefepime for the Empirical Treatment of Febrile Neutropenic Episodes in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

The empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer requires antibacterial regimens active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. This study was performed to demonstrate the noninferiority of monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam, compared with cefepime. We conducted a randomized-controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial among high-risk patients from 34 university-affiliated tertiary care medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia who were undergoing treatment for leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and were hospitalized for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes. Patients received piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g every 6 h) or cefepime (2 g every 8 h) intravenously. The primary outcome was success (defined by defervescence without treatment modification) at 72 h of treatment, end of treatment, and test of cure in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, microbiological efficacy, the additional use of glycopeptide antibiotics, emergence of resistant bacteria, and safety. For 528 subjects (265 received piperacillin-tazobactam and 263 received cefepime), success rates were 57.7% and 48.3%, respectively (P = .04) at the 72-h time point, 39.6% and 31.6% (P = .06) at end of treatment, and 26.8% and 20.5% (P = .11) at the test-of-cure visit. The analyses demonstrated noninferiority for piperacillin-tazobactam at all time points (P< or = .0001). Treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam was independently associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.64; P = .035). Both regimens were well tolerated. This study demonstrates the noninferiority and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy, compared with cefepime, for the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Cholecystitis in neutropenic patients: Retrospective study and systematic review

Abdominal infections are life-threatening complications in neutropenic patients. Among these, neutropenic cholecystitis is relatively rare. Nevertheless, its actual relevance is only investigated by anecdotal reports. We present a consecutive retrospective series of nine patients over a 12-year period. We calculated a frequency of 0.4% among all neutropenic episodes in patients with acute leukemia or aggressive lymphoma undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Only three of these patients had gallstones. Four patients died during the course of cholecystitis but in none of them cholecystitis was the primary cause of death. Systematic review of the literature revealed 45 patients with neutropenic cholecystitis of whom 26.7% died.

Clinical Experience with Three Combination Regimens for the Treatment of High-risk Febrile Neutropenia

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h), piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg every 6 h), and meropenem (1 g every 8 h), when combined with amikacin (15 mg/kg once daily), in the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with haematological malignancy. A prospective, comparative study designed in the haematology unit of a university hospital in Turkey. A total of 89 febrile episodes in 60 neutropenic patients were treated; 29 febrile episodes in 23 patients with ceftazidime plus amikacin (group 1), 30 episodes in 25 patients with piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin (group 2), and 30 episodes in 25 patients with meropenem plus amikacin (group 3). The 3 groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, underlying malignancy, pretherapy neutrophil counts, duration of neutropenia and types of infections. Neutropenia, since the start of fever, persisted for > or =10 days in all of the episodes in the 3 study groups. Nearly all of the episodes were seen in patients with acute leukaemia. In 25.8% (23/89) of the febrile neutropenia episodes, an aetiologic organism was isolated, with gram-negative bacteria being the most commonly isolated. The success without modification rates were 34.5%, 30% and 36.7% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P >0.05). After modification with a different class of antimicrobial therapy, the response rates increased to 65.5%, 63.3% and 70% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P >0.05). The mean duration of treatment and the time to defervescence were also comparable in all groups. In all arms, side effects were minimal. It is concluded that the 3 regimens were equally effective and safe in the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic episodes.

Neutropenia febril en menores con Leucemia linfoblástica aguda

Introduction: Febrile neutropenia is the first manifestation of a life threatening infection in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Objectives: an analysis of the profile of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients under 15 years treated for ALL in Valdivia. Patients and methods: We reviewed 150 episodes in children enrolled in the ALL childrens protocol PINDA 96 MINSAL at the Regional Clinical Hospital Valdivia between 1996 and 1999. Results: 71.4% of episodes were during severe neutropenia (RAN <500/mm3). The source of the infection was established in 72.6% of cases, the most frequent focus was respiratory 53.4% (80/150). The causative organism was identified in 29.3%, with a predominance of gram + followed by gram- and fungi. 11.4% had positive blood cultures, 46% being gram -- bacilli, 34.6% gram + cocci, 11.8% Candida and 3.8% gram + bacilli. Treatment with iv cloxacillin 100 mg/kg/day and iv amikacin 15 mg/kg/day was successful in 66%, increasing to a 94% success rate with the addition of iv ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day. Conclusions: We obtained an appropriate identification of the infective focus in febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with ALL, and an adequate control with combined antibiotic therapy.

Abdominal infections in patients with acute leukaemia: a prospective study applying ultrasonography and microbiology.

A prospective study of 62 chemotherapy-induced neutropenic episodes in patients with acute leukaemia was conducted to determine the incidence and causes of abdominal infections, and to assess the diagnostic value of the combined use of ultrasonography (US) and microbiology. Each patient underwent US of liver, gallbladder and complete bowel before chemotherapy, on days 2-4 after the end of chemotherapy and in cases of fever, diarrhoea or abdominal pain. US was combined with a standardized clinical examination and a broad spectrum of microbiological investigations. From January to August 2001, 243 US examinations were performed. The overall incidence of abdominal infectious diseases was 17.7% (11 out of 62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 9-29%). Four patients (6.5%) developed neutropenic enterocolitis; two of them died, two survived. Bowel wall thickening (BWT) > 4 mm in these four patients ranged from 5.8 to 23.6 mm and was detected only in one patient with mucositis. In three other patients (4.8%) Clostridium difficile, and in one patient (1.6%) Campylobacter jejuni, caused enterocolitis without BWT. Cholecystitis was diagnosed in three patients (4.8%) and hepatic candidiasis was strongly suspected in one patient. Abdominal infections caused by gastroenteritis viruses, cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Cryptosporidium were not observed. We conclude that in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy: (i) BWT is not a feature of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and should therefore be considered as sign of infectious enterocolitis; (ii) viruses, classic bacterial enteric pathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, Aeromonas, Vibrio subsp., enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli) and Cryptosporidium have a very low incidence; and (iii) abdominal infections may be underestimated when US is not used in every patient with abdominal pain.

Management of fever in neutropenic patients.

Substantial progress has been made in the management of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, largely by the prompt administration of potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. During the past several decades, the spectrum of organisms has changed from a predominance of gram-negative pathogens to a predominance of gram-positive pathogens. In recent years, some hospitals have experienced an increase of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant pathogens. Hence, it is no longer possible to rely on standardized regimens, but antimicrobial therapy must be selected based on the predominant pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at each institution. It is customary to initiate antifungal therapy empirically in those patients whose fever persists despite broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. Alternatives now exist to amphotericin B, including lipid formulations of this drug, and fluconazole. It is critically important that each patient be carefully re-assessed before starting antifungal therapy, because there are many other potential causes for persistent fever, including resistant bacteria and viruses. Novel approaches to therapy include outpatient antibiotics, and use of growth factors as adjunctive therapy. There also has been a renewed interest in white blood cell transfusions. Although the prognosis for infection in neutropenic patients has improved greatly, new infectious problems have emerged that limit our successful management of these complications.

The Role of Teicoplanin in the Treatment of Febrile Neutropenia

SummaryThe clinical and microbiological efficacy, cost-per-patient and tolerability of teicoplanin were compared with those of vancomycin as empirical or secondline treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancy or solid tumors. In terms of efficacy and cost teicoplanin and vancomycin were found equivalent, while teicoplanin is better tolerated and may be used effectively for treatment of out-patients.

Prospective screening by a panfungal polymerase chain reaction assay in patients at risk for fungal infections: implications for the management of febrile neutropenia.

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of mortality in neutropenic cancer patients. To determine whether a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay enabled the identification of patients at risk for invasive fungal infections, a prospective monitoring once per week was performed during 92 neutropenic episodes in patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or high-dose therapy followed by allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation, with the investigators blinded to clinical and microbiological data. PCR positivity was documented in 34 out of 92 risk episodes. All patients developing proven invasive fungal infection were found PCR positive, and PCR was found to be the earliest indicator of invasive fungal infection preceding clinical evidence by a mean of 5.75 d (range 0-14 d). In febrile neutropenic patients without a prior history of invasive fungal infection, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73% of the PCR assay for the development of proven or probable invasive fungal infection was documented. In conclusion, panfungal PCR performed prospectively once a week enabled the identification of patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections.

A Comparative Study of Cefepime versus Ceftazidime as Empiric Therapy of Febrile Episodes in Neutropenic Patients

An open-label, randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime (2.0 g q. 8 h) and ceftazidime (2.0 g q. 8 h) in the empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients. A total of 45 eligible febrile episodes were randomized (1:1) to be treated with the study regimen. Nineteen febrile episodes treated with cefepime and 22 febrile episodes treated with ceftazidime were evaluable for efficacy. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, height, weight, underlying neoplasm, number of pretherapy neutrophil, duration of neutropenia and types of infections. The overall therapeutic success rate of the cefepime group (53%) was comparable to the ceftazidime group (50%). It did not differ significantly (95% confidence interval: –0.28 to 0.34, p = 0.85). Eighty-eight percent of pathogens in each group were bacteriologically eradicated. The safety profile was similar in both groups. No patients in either group discontinued the therapy because of adverse events. None (0%) of the cefepime patients and 2 (9%) of the ceftazidime patients died of infection. The results of this study suggest that cefepime is an effective and safe agent in the empiric therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.

Conclusion: Fourth-generation cephalosporins: new hopes and new duties.

Conclusion: Fourth-generation cephalosporins: new hopes and new duties.