Epidural Group Research Articles

Combined spinal-epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial.

The dural puncture epidural technique is a modification of the combined spinal-epidural technique. Data comparing the two techniques are limited. We performed this randomised study to compare the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of analgesia with the dural puncture epidural vs. the combined spinal-epidural technique. Term parturients requesting labour epidural analgesia were allocated randomly to receive either dural puncture epidural or combined spinal-epidural. Analgesia was initiated with 2 mg intrathecal bupivacaine and 10 μg fentanyl in parturients allocated to the combined spinal-epidural group and with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.1% with 2 μg.ml-1 fentanyl in parturients allocated to the dural puncture epidural group. Analgesia was maintained using patient-controlled epidural analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural boluses. The primary outcome of the study was the quality of labour analgesia, which was defined by a composite of five components: asymmetric block after 30 min of initiation (difference in sensory level of more than two dermatomes); epidural top-up interventions; catheter adjustment; catheter replacement; and failed conversion to neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, requiring general anaesthesia or replacement of the neuraxial block. One hundred parturients were included in the analysis (48 combined spinal-epidural, 52 dural puncture epidural). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the primary composite outcome of quality of analgesia (33% in the combined spinal-epidural group vs. 25% in the dural puncture epidural group), risk ratio (95%CI) 0.75 (0.40-1.39); p = 0.486. Median (IQR [range]) pain scores at 15 min were significantly lower in patients allocated to the combined spinal-epidural group compared with the dural puncture epidural group (0 (0-1[0-8]) vs. 1 (0-4 [0-10]); p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of a combined spinal-epidural compared with a dural puncture epidural technique.

Comparison of The Effects of Epidural Analgesia and Conventional Analgesia on Survival in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Oncological Surgery: A retrospective analysis

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether mortality due to gynecologic cancer differs in patients who received epidural analgesia versus conventional analgesia. Additionally, we aimed to investigate which analgesia approach results in a better prognosis for gynecologic cancer. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for a gynecologic malignancy were divided into two study groups based on the type of analgesia used: the Epidural Analgesia Group (n=120) and the Conventional Analgesia Group (n=88). All data were retrospectively collected from patient case charts. Variables recorded included patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), presence of comorbid diseases, duration of anesthesia, amount of blood transfusion. During surgery, duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, presence of postoperative infection, and type of postoperative treatment. Results: Survival after surgery tended to be higher in patients who received conventional analgesia (81 out of 88 patients) compared to those who received epidural analgesia (102 out of 120 patients), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.123). After controlling for all other factors, the coefficient for blood transfusion was -0.192 with a p- value of 0.007, indicating that a lower amount of blood transfusion was associated with increased survival. Similarly, the coefficient for the presence of comorbid diseases was -0.163 with a p-value of 0.022, suggesting that fewer comorbidities contributed to better survival post-surgery. Conventional analgesia showed higher survival rates (coefficient=0.163,p=0.022) compared to epidural analgesia. None of the other variables showed a significant correlation with survival. Conclusion: This study is among the pioneering research efforts to explore the impact of analgesia methods on the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic gynecologic cancer. A lower amount of blood transfusion during surgery and fewer comorbid diseases contribute to improved survival rates.

Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique on Management of Breakthrough Pain for Parous Women Receiving Labor Analgesia during Induced Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study assessed the effectiveness of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in managing breakthrough pain in parous women receiving labor analgesia during induced labor. This single-center retrospective cohort study included term pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received treatment for breakthrough pain during labor. All participants underwent induced labor, and some parous women among them underwent DPE. The DPE technique consisted of placing an epidural catheter after dural puncture with a 27-gauge spinal needle. Eligible women were allocated into a DPE group and conventional epidural (CE) anesthesia group. Pain was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS), and a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus was administered when the NRS score was ≥3. Breakthrough pain was defined as an NRS score ≥3 during PCEA management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of rescue interventions in managing breakthrough pain, as determined by a reduction in pain intensity to an NRS score <3 before birth. Among the 55 parous women who received labor analgesia, 44 required additional rescue administration for breakthrough pain. Of the remaining women, 23 received DPE and 19 received CE anesthesia. The DPE group experienced significantly more effective relief of breakthrough pain before birth than did the CE group (DPE: 100%; CE: 68.4%; p=0.005). In parous women, DPE anesthesia was more effective than CE anesthesia in providing analgesia for breakthrough pain immediately before delivery during induced labor.

A randomised comparison of transverse abdominal plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative opioid consumption for colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery programme (OPIATE study).

The transverse abdominis plane block is increasingly being used as a less-invasive alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia for effective pain management. This study aimed to compare transverse abdominis plane block with opioid-based thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of postoperative opioid consumption. Patients in the thoracic epidural analgesia group received a continuous infusion of 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2mcg/ml of fentanyl, while those in the transverse abdominis plane group received 6-hourly boluses of 0.4ml/kg of 0.25% levobupivacaine. The primary objective was to compare the average fentanyl consumption, measured as intravenous fentanyl equivalents, over 72 hours. Data of 35 patients were analysed. Fentanyl consumption at the end of 72 hours was significantly lower in the transverse abdominis plane group (median [interquartile range] 495 mcg (255, 750), and mean (95% confidence interval) 717.35mcg (403.54-1031.16)) compared to the thoracic epidural analgesia group (median [interquartile range] 760mcg (750, 760), and mean (95% confidence interval) 787mcg (746.81-827.19)) with a p value of 0.010. Pain scores at rest and during movement were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the median pain scores during movement were significantly lower in the thoracic epidural analgesia group at 60 and 72 hours (p ⩽ 0.05). Multimodal analgesia with transverse abdominis plane resulted in lower opioid consumption over 72 hours compared to thoracic epidural analgesia.

Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Adequate pain relief during childbirth is a very important issue for women and healthcare providers. This study investigates the effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes of two analgesic methods during labor: water immersion and epidural analgesia. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study at a first-level hospital, in Spain, from 2009 to 2019, 1134 women, low-risk singleton and at term pregnancy, were selected. Among them, 567 women used water immersion; 567 women used epidural analgesia for pain control. Maternal outcomes included mode of birth and perineum condition. Neonatal outcomes included 5 min Apgar score, umbilical cord arterial pH, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions. Chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney U tests, together with their effect sizes (Cramer’s V, odds ratio, and Cohen’s d) were used to test the main hypotheses. Results: Spontaneous vaginal birth was almost 17 times more likely in the water immersion group (OR = 16.866 [6.540, 43.480], p &lt; 0.001), whereas the odds of having a cesarean birth were almost 40 times higher in the epidural group (OR = 39.346 [3.610, 429.120], p &lt; 0.001). The odds of having an intact perineum were more than two times higher for the water immersion group (OR = 2.606 [1.290, 5.250], p = 0.007), whereas having an episiotomy was more than eight times more likely for the epidural group (OR = 8.307 [2.800, 24.610], p &lt; 0.001). Newborns in the water immersion group showed a better 5 min Apgar score and umbilical cord arterial pH and lower rates in admissions at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Conclusions: Women choosing water immersion as an analgesic method were no more likely to experience adverse outcomes and presented better results than women choosing epidural analgesia.

Ultrasound-guided bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A randomised controlled study

Objective: Ultrasound-guided bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament has recently been proposed as an effective analgesia for abdominal surgery. To test the hypothesis that this novel technique was a viable alternative approach of conventional thoracic epidural analgesia for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Methods: Three hundred patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were randomised 1:1 into the anterior quadratus lumborum block group: receiving the novel regional analgesia, and the thoracic epidural analgesia group: receiving thoracic epidural anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was intraoperative consumption of propofol and remifentanil. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed for all variables. Results: At five and ten minutes after block, anterior quadratus lumborum block group achieved more dermatomes coverage of the sensory block with both p &lt; 0.001. Intraoperative consumption of propofol and remifentanil was comparable between two groups (1116.21 ± 199.76 versus 1166.45 ± 125.31µg, p = 0.245 and remifentanil 1.83 ± 0.41 versus 1.81 ± 0.37ng, p = 0.988). However, anterior quadratus lumborum block group was associated with less intraoperative consumption of norepinephrine and atropine, shorter time to urinary catheter removal and out-of-bed activity than the thoracic epidural anaesthesia group. No significant difference in extubation time, pain scores at rest and exercising at all time points following surgery was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with conventional thoracic epidural anaesthesia, the novel technique was an equivalent effective component of multimodal analgesic protocol for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. There were some advantages, including shorter procedure time, more reliable dermatomal coverage, shorter duration of urinary catheterisation and earlier time of out-of-bed activity to enhance recovery after surgery. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 2 November 2022 (ChiCTR2200065325).

Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Plexus-Sciatic Nerve Blocks Versus Epidurals for Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Study to Compare the Competency of Novice Anaesthesiology Residents in a High-Volume Level 1 Trauma Centre.

The relative merits of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) over central neuraxial anaesthesia and the advantages of the above two techniques over general anaesthesia for surgical interventions of the lower limb are well established. The competency of anaesthetic trainees in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre in administering dual ultrasound and nerve stimulator-guided lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block(DUNLuPS) vs. epidural anaesthesia (EA) was compared by reporting the adequacy of anaesthesia with the two techniques, time taken for the performance of block, time of onset of sensoryblock (TOSB), and time of onset of motor block (TOMB). This prospective, randomized, study enrolled 92 patients aged 18-80 years with lower limb fractures admitted in trauma triage and scheduled for surgery. Thepatients were randomly allocated equally into the EA group and the DUNLuPS group. A total of 20 anaesthesia trainees in the third year of residencywith clinical experience of more than 15 independent lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks were included in the study.A volume of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered in the lumbar plexus (Shamrock technique) but the volume used for sciatic nerve (subgluteal approach) was varied so that the cumulative dose did not exceed 3 mg/kg. For each block, the onset of nerve blockade was assessed every five minutes, and the assessments continued for an additional 30 minutes after the nerve blocks were finished. Clinical characteristics and adequacy of anaesthesia were comparable, i.e., 95.65% and93.47% success in the EA (n = 46) and DUNLuPS (n = 46) groups, respectively. Performance time was significantly more in the DUNLuPS group but followed by significantly less TOSB and TOMB. The time for the first analgesic request was 351.63 ± 148.70 minutes in the DUNLuPS group and 147.60 ± 52.65 minutes in the EAgroup (p < 0.0001). Both EA and DUNLuPS provide effective and comparable intra-operative anaesthesia for orthopaedic lower limb surgeries (OLLS) when administered by residents with more than two years of experience (third year of residency)in ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre. Statistically significant differences in the block performance characteristicshad no clinical advantage as it was compensated by the faster onset time in the DUNLuPS group. Post-operative pain management was better in the DUNLuPS group, sothe practice and conduct of anaesthesia for trauma patients should focus on the establishment of "block rooms" and timely training of residents in the former so that the advantages can be extended to the patient population.

The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundOpen liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects.ResultsA total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsEpidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT number: NCT06301932.

759. P02.04 PARAVERTEBRAL VERSUS EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGEAL RESECTION (PEPMEN): A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED MULTICENTER TRIAL

Abstract Background Thoracic epidural analgesia has been the mainstay for pain control in esophageal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Although effective epidural analgesia potentially contributes to achieving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) goals in patients undergoing MIE, it can have counterproductive side effects such as hypotension, urinary retention and reduced mobility. Paravertebral analgesia may be a promising alternative to epidural analgesia, avoiding potential side effects and improving postoperative recovery. Methods This open randomized controlled superiority trial was conducted across four Dutch centers. A total of 192 patients with esophageal cancer, scheduled for elective transthoracic MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis, were included and randomized to receive either epidural analgesia or paravertebral analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) on the third postoperative day (POD). Secondary outcomes included the quality of life, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, need for inotropic/vasopressor medication, duration of admission, mobilization, complications, readmission, and mortality. Results From December 2019 to February 2023, 94 patients were assigned to epidural and 98 to paravertebral analgesia. QoR-40 score on POD3 did not differ between groups (mean difference 3.7; P=.268). The epidural group had higher QoR-40 scores on POD1 and 2 (mean difference 7.7; P=.018, mean difference 7.3; P=.020) and lower pain scores (1 versus 2; P=&amp;lt;.001, 1 versus 2; P=.033). More patients in the epidural group required vasopressor-medication on POD1 (38.3% versus 13.3%; P&amp;lt;.001). In the paravertebral group, the urinary catheter was removed one day earlier (P=&amp;lt;.001). No significant differences in complications or length of stay were observed. Conclusion This multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial did not show superiority of paravertebral analgesia over epidural analgesia in quality of recovery on the third day after minimally invasive esophagectomy. These results, however, support the safety of paravertebral analgesia as a viable alternative to epidural analgesia, enabling the provision of both techniques to patients in clinical practice.

The effect of longer epidural duration after open pancreaticoduodenectomy on pain and mobilisation: A retrospective single-centre analysis.

The optimal length of epidural use following open pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been defined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the length of patient-controlled epidural analgesia affected pain and ability to mobilise on epidural termination following open pancreaticoduodenectomy in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery. A retrospective single-centre cohort analysis was performed between November 2015 and December 2021 on patients who underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy. As part of a continual review process of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, patient-controlled epidural analgesia duration changed allowing stratification of patients into either three- or five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups. Of the 196 patients identified, 157 were included with 80 (50.9%) and 77 (49.1%) allocated to the three-day and five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups, respectively. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination on postoperative day 3 was associated with transiently higher pain and less mobilisation, although no greater rescue analgesia requirement. Conversely, longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage following open pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with less pain and greater mobilisation in the immediate postoperative period. Earlier patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination transiently leads to increased pain and decreased mobilisation following open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ensuring appropriate analgesia requirements or longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage should be considered to avoid patient discomfort and enhance recovery.

Study of Efficacy of Extraosseous Local Infiltration of Multimodal Drug Cocktail for Pain Management After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Lower Limb.

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic debilitating condition involving joints that ultimately leads to chronic pain, restricted mobility, and functional impairment of the joint. The gold standard treatment of end-stage OA is arthroplasty. Following arthroplasty surgery, patients might have excruciating pain in the postoperative period. Our study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects of a multimodal drug cocktail in patients who underwent arthroplasty surgery concerning postoperative pain and knee range of motion during the healing period. Materials and methods In this randomised case-control study, we enrolled 32 patients, of which 16 patients had knee arthritis and underwent total knee replacement. In contrast, the other 16 patients had hip arthritis and underwent total hip replacement. Randomisation was done using simple random sampling (envelope method), and patients were divided into groups A and Baccordingly. Group A consists of a postoperative pain management modality using epidural analgesia with a top-up at a 12-hour interval. Group B consists of a postoperative pain management modality using an extraosseous multimodaldrugcocktail consisting of clonidine, cefuroxime, tramadol, bupivacaine, adrenaline, and normal saline in specific quantities. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was assessed post-surgery for walking and resting. Joint range of movement and walking distance were assessed post-surgery and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 32 patients who had OA and underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) were selected and divided into case and control groups of eight, each by simple random sampling (envelope method).The mean preop VAS scores for the epidural and cocktail groups were 7.88 ± 0.61 and 7.44 ± 0.62, respectively, with p = 0.057, which is insignificant. However, when the groups were compared based on VAS score while standing at 24, 48, and 72 hours, the standing VAS score was found to be significantly higher among subjects, given epidural analgesia with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.001 at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively, which is significant in our study. Also, postoperatively, at 24, 48, and 72 hours, the mean degree of movement was found to be significantly higher among subjects, given cocktail analgesia with p-values of 0.013, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. Conclusion As a result of early postoperative pain alleviation, the current study concludes that multimodal pain control procedures, which combine more than two medications with distinct mechanisms of action, successfully increase patient satisfaction. A multimodal medication conjunction administered locally to patients resulted in improved functional outcomes, faster recovery, and better rehabilitation.

Continuous ropivacaine infusion via epidural catheter improving gastrointestinal dysfuncion in acute pancreatitis: A preliminary study

This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous infusion of ropivacaine via an epidural catheter in improving gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with severe or predicted severe pancreatitis. Of 27 patients, 21(77.8%) were male, and the mean age was 49 ± 10.9 years. Fourteen patients were in the epidural analgesia (EA) group and thirteen patients were in the non-epidural analgesia (NEA) group. There was a trend of improvement of GIF score in the EA group. The mean of GIF score day 1, day 2 and day 3 in the epidural group was significantly less than NEA group (2.19 ± 0.65 vs 2.77 ± 0.76, p-value = 0.043). In a population of critical care unit adults with severe acute pancreatitis or predicted severe acute pancreatitis, this preliminary study showed that continuous infusion of ropivacaine via an epidural catheter may have some benefits in gastrointestinal function. Further comparative investigations with large study populations and multicenter data are necessary.

The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia in great saphenous varicose vein surgery, based on hemodynamics and anesthesia efficacy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

This study aimed to explore the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and anesthesia efficacy in patients undergoing great saphenous varicose vein surgery. A total of 90 patients were randomly divided into three groups: 0.25 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED1 group), 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED2 group), and 0.75 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED3 group). Hemodynamics, anesthesia efficiency, and adverse reactions were recorded. Compared with the ED1 group, the ED2 group had lower systolic blood pressure at T1-3 (T1, 95%CIs, 6.52-21.93, p < 0.001; T2, 95%CIs, 2.88-18.21, p = 0.004; T3, 95%CIs, 0.49-18.17, p = 0.035), and the diastolic blood pressure at T1-2 was decreased (T1, 95%CIs, 4.55-14.36, p < 0.001; T2, 95%CIs, 0.37-12.17, p = 0.033). Compared with the ED2 group, the ED3 group had higher systolic blood pressure at T1-2 (T1, 95%CIs, 5.90-21.46, p < 0.001; T2, 95%CIs, 2.07-17.55, p = 0.008) and higher diastolic blood pressure at T1-3 (T1, 95%CIs, 2.91-12.81, p = 0.001; T2, 95%CIs, 1.32-13.23, p = 0.011; T3, 95%CIs, 0.14-11.52, p = 0.043). Compared with the ED2 group, the heart rate was significantly decreased at T1-4 in the ED3 group (T1, 95%CIs, 2.25-15.72, p = 0.005; T2, 95%CIs, 2.35-13.82, p = 0.003; T3, 95%CIs, 0.50-9.79, p = 0.025; T4, 95%CIs, 1.46-10.36, p = 0.005). The myocardial oxygen consumption in all three groups was significantly decreased at each time point compared to T0 (p < 0.05 or < 0.001), and no significant between-group differences were detected (P>0.05). Compared with the ED1 group, the anesthesia efficiency of ED2 and ED3 groups was markedly enhanced, but the risk of bradycardia in ED2 and ED3 groups was dramatically increased (6 of 28 [21.4%] vs. 14 of 30 [46.7%] and 14 of 27 [51.9%], p = 0.023), one patient in the ED3 group experienced difficulty urinating, and remaining adverse reactions were mild in all three groups. A measure of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine is the optimal dose as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing great saphenous varicose vein surgery. http://www.chictr.org.cn/, registration number: ChiCTR2200060619.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Postoperative Pain Relief in Ultrasound Guided Fascia Illiaca Compartment Block versus Epidural Block on Quality of Recovery (QOR-15) in Patients Undergoing Femoral Surgery

Background: The occurrence of femoral fractures is quite high. The quality of life gets affected to a large extent due to pain and post-operative delirium. Various regional block techniques like Fascia illiaca compartment block, lumbar epidural analgesia, femoral nerve block, etc. have been described for femoral fractures. In this study, we compared the efficacy of post-operative pain relief FICB and Epidural block on quality of recovery (QOR-15) in patients undergoing femoral surgery. Methods: This study included 40 patients wherein 20 patients were given FICB and 20 patients were given Epidural block. The patients were followed up for post-operative pain relief, Quality of Recovery, occurrence of delirium, disability and fraility. Results: Quality of recovery QOR-15 was similar for both the groups preoperatively as well as at 24 hour and 48 hours post-operatively. Additionally, there was no difference in the time taken to administer the block, postoperative VAS score on movement and rest, requirement of additional analgesia and opioid consumption. Moreover, there were no significant differences in WHO disability assessment, modified frailty score, prevalence of delirium, mortality, morbidity and side effects of techniques. However, the total duration of hospital stay (in days) was found to be significantly more in the epidural group as compared with the FICB group (5.75±1.61 vs 4.75±1.16; P=0.38). Conclusion: Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block is a tangible alternative to epidural block in patients undergoing femoral fracture repair.

Can a Sacrococcygeal Epidural of 0.25% Bupivacaine Prevent the Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System during Feline Ovariectomy?

The ovariectomy (OVE) procedure can trigger somatosensory and visceral peritoneal nociception. Sacrococcygeal epidural (ScE) anesthesia may complement or replace systemic analgesia used for feline OVE, reducing opioid consumption and their related undesirable adverse effects and consequently reducing or completely blocking the sympathetic nervous system activation during this procedure. The present study aimed to evaluate the activation of the sympathetic nervous system resulting from adding an ScE injection of bupivacaine 0.25% (0.3 mL kg-1) in feline OVE and identify whether this translates to hemodynamic variables stability. A Parasympathetic Tone Activity (PTA) monitor was applied given that it performs analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) detecting changes in sympathetic and parasympathetic tone, making it a good tool for detecting activation of the sympathetic nervous system during the study. Two groups of animals were evaluated in five perioperative times, namely, the control group (CG) (n = 18) with systemic analgesia alone and the sacrococcygeal epidural group (ScEG) (n = 20) with 0.25% bupivacaine combined with systemic analgesia. Thirty-eight female cats were selected. All animals assigned to CG and ScEG were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (20 μg kg-1 IM) and methadone (0.2 mg kg-1 IM). General anesthesia was induced with propofol IV ad effectum and maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Heart rate, non-invasive systolic and median blood pressure, respiratory rate, and instantaneous parasympathetic tone activity were recorded. Compared to systemic analgesia alone (CG), sacrococcygeal epidural (ScEG) reduced the rise of common hemodynamic variables but did not prevent sympathetic nervous system activation.

Comparison of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block and Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Adequate pain control and early mobilization are critical in the postoperative period after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Regional anesthesia can reduce postoperative pain, but certain techniques can increase the risk of postoperative motor block and delayed functional recovery. Continuous lumbar epidurals can provide excellent analgesia but also create challenges with early ambulation. Recently, suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) single-shot blocks have been shown to provide effective analgesia in PAO patients. The goal of this study was to compare opioid use, time to achieve inpatient physical therapy (PT) goals, and length of stay (LOS) between a cohort of patients receiving SIFI blocks and a cohort of patients receiving epidural analgesia (EA). This retrospective single-surgeon comparative cohort study included all patients who underwent a PAO between 2012 and 2022. Regional anesthetic technique (SIFI vs EA), length of hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, pain scores, and time to achievement of PT milestones before discharge were recorded. Patients were excluded if they had any preexisting neuromuscular syndrome or neurosensory deficit. All opioid use was converted to morphine-milligram equivalents using standard conversions. Two hundred four surgeries were done over the study period; 164 patients received EA, and 40 received a SIFI block. The average age of our cohort was 19.5 years (±6 yrs). The SIFI cohort had a significantly shorter mean LOS than the EA cohort (2.9 vs 4.1 days, P < 0.001). Patients in the SIFI cohort achieved all PT ambulation goals significantly sooner than the lumbar epidural group (P < 0.001), with lower total opioid use on each postoperative day. No notable differences were observed in sex, race, BMI, or pain scores at inpatient PT visits before discharge. After PAO surgery, the SIFI block is associated with shorter hospital LOS, reduced postoperative opioid use, and earlier mobilization when compared with those who were managed with an epidural.

Prospective observational study comparing the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with or without epidural anesthesia: the Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer Study Group (KYCC) 1806.

There have been no adequate comparisons of the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LAC), with and without epidural anesthesia (EDA). This was a multicenter prospective observational study of patients undergoing LAC. The primary end point was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) score on postoperative days (PODs) 1-7. The secondary end points were the highest VAS, complication rate, days to first ambulation and fatigue, length of hospital stay, and time to commencement of surgery. We compared an EDA group (Group E, n = 48) and a no-EDA group (Group O, n = 48) after matching. The mean VAS was not significantly different between the groups (28.7 vs. 30.1, p = 0.288). On assessing the secondary end points, the highest VAS was not significantly different between the groups. In fact, the VAS was lower in Group E only on POD 2. There was no difference in the incidence of complications, the time to first postoperative evacuation was shorter in Group E, and postoperative hospitalization was similar. The time to surgery was shorter in Group O. These results suggest that LAC without EDA is a feasible option, but with the early and regular use of adjunctive measures to provide more stable analgesia.

Intrathecal Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery

Introduction: Thoracic surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain involving parietal, visceral, and projected components. Potent analgesia at rest and during movement over an extended period is crucial. Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard, but intrathecal analgesia may represent a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of intrathecal analgesia to provide comparable pain relief to thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery. Methods: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted over 12 months. Adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were included after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (Epidural group, n=40) with a loading dose of 10 ml 0.1% bupivacaine + 10 mcg sufentanil followed by continuous infusion, or intrathecal analgesia (Intrathecal group, n=23) with a single injection of 500 mcg morphine + 10 mcg sufentanil. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative care protocols were applied. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain scores (NRS 0-10), rescue analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in the Epidural group (30% vs 8.7%, p=0.04). Postoperative pain scores were initially lower in the Intrathecal group, but the difference was not significant beyond 18 hours. Rescue morphine requirements were significantly higher in the Epidural group during the first 12 postoperative hours. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the Intrathecal group (82.6% vs 62.5%, p=0.03). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and pruritus was significantly higher in the Intrathecal group. Discussion: Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative hypotension, likely due to the extended sympathetic blockade. Intrathecal analgesia provided superior early postoperative ....

Perioperative management and neuraxial analgesia in women with factor XI deficiency (

BackgroundFactor (F)XI deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder with a poor correlation between bleeding tendency and FXI level. Management of pregnant women with FXI deficiency is not clearly established, especially regarding neuraxial analgesia (NA). ObjectivesA retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted in French hemostasis centers on pregnant women with FXI of <60 IU/dL. MethodsData to report were (i) FXI levels before pregnancy and at time of delivery, (ii) type of NA and delivery management modalities, and (iii) possible complications related to NA and bleeding complications. ResultsThree hundred fourteen pregnancies in patients with FXI deficiency of <60 IU/dL were reported (from 20 centers); among them, 199 NA procedures have been completed (137 epidurals and 61 spinals, 1 had both). The period of childbirth was mostly from 2014 to 2020 (281/314; 89.5%). Congenital FXI deficiency was established with certainty by investigators in 32.8% patients (n = 103). Previous bleedings were described in 20.4% of the patients (64/314; 45.3% cutaneous, 31.3% gynecologic, and 15.6% postsurgical). Thirteen deliveries had an NA procedure with FXI of <30 IU/dL, 42 with FXI of 30-40 IU/dL, and 118 with FXI of 40-60 IU/dL. Median FXI levels at delivery in the epidural and spinal groups were not significantly different but were significantly lower in the group without NA by medical staff contraindications. There were no complications related to NA. A 17.5% postpartum hemorrhage or excessive postpartum bleeding incidence was reported, which is consistent with previous data. ConclusionOur data support the use of a 30 IU/dL FXI threshold for NA, as suggested by the French proposals published in August 2023.

Comparative analysis of combined spinal–epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of combined spinalepidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous stone surgery prospectively.Materials and methodsThe study prospectively included patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy with general anesthesia (Group.1) or combined spinal–epidural anesthesia (Group.2) at the Department of Urology, Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk University. between December 2018 and December 2019. The effect of the anesthesia technique on the comfort and satisfaction of the operating room personnel, surgeon and anesthesia team were prospectively evaluated and recorded.ResultsDuring the postoperative period, the spinal anesthesia group had a significantly lower visual analog score than the general anesthesia group. No patient in either group required narcotic analgesics during the postoperative period. In terms of overall satisfaction scores, the surgeon performing the surgical procedure had a significantly higher satisfaction score in the general anesthesia group than in the CSEA group. The score was considered good in the general anesthesia group and moderate in the CSEA group. Personnel satisfaction was higher in the patient group that underwent CSEA. In the general anesthesia group, the score was considered to be average. In the CSEA group, the satisfaction score was considered good, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The anesthesia team’s satisfaction score was moderate, with no significant difference between the CSEA and general anesthesia groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionPCNL under CSEA can be performed safely in certain individuals. Different anesthetic techniques may have varied levels of satisfaction among the surgical team.